
CON BANEGA CROREPATI
An easy-on-the-eyes romp says there’s more to life than just get-rich-quick schemes. Plus, Gurinder Chadha returns to (relative) form.
MAY 9, 2010 – IT TAKES A BIT OF CONVINCING TO BUY the Mumbai of Badmaash Company as the Mumbai of the mid-nineties – if only because of the spiffy styling of the characters, each one looking like they’ve never heard of a bad hair day. The India of then was different. Even on screen, the stars (those arbiters of the latest and the greatest in styles) were different, very “Indian looking” and hardly the plasticky puppets of the screen today, who could fit right into any movie being made in any part of the world. But that ornery detail apart, you recognise the signposts of Old India, like the father (Anupam Kher) who’s spent a quarter-century slaving for the same employers (and looks forward to the trophy he’ll be bestowed with, for his loyalty), and who wants his son Karan (Shahid Kapoor) to pursue an MBA. In the latter, we glimpse the first stirring of the New India, the newly liberalised India. “Meri mehnat ka faayda sirf mujhe hona chahiye,” he pouts, that the fruits of his labour shall fall only into his hands. The only company he’s loyal to is his own, the one inside his head, the one he dreams of being listed on the stock exchange.
Karan is a man with big ideas and bigger balls. Along with Chandu (Vir Das), Tenzing (Meiyang Chang) and Bulbul (Anushka Sharma), he becomes, at first, a carrier for a smuggler. And as he reaps the rewards of their risk-taking, it’s an unsurprising (and inevitable) segue to a life of soft crime, involving customs auctions and insider trading. The director, Parmeet Sethi, isn’t interested in showing us a fumbling foursome at the verge of tricky transactions, mopping sweaty foreheads with nervous hands, never sure when they might wind up behind bars. He wants, simply, to entertain us with the thrill of the con. (He borrows the satiny textures of the Ocean’s Eleven films. He also borrows the feel of David Holmes’s compulsively propulsive soundtrack, which made us feel there was nothing so stylish, so fun, as swindling the sucker born this minute.) Sethi, for a while, makes us delight in rooting for these young Indians forging their futures in ways their forefathers could have scarcely imagined. He makes us vicarious amoralists.
And then, sadly, morality strikes, and the carefree “New India” story turns into a cautionary tale worthy of any number of films from Old India, films like Tere Mere Sapne, where people who were blinded by power and money were punished, apparently, for simply coveting success. Early on, we see Karan making out with Bulbul in a car. (It’s pouring outside; the radio, appropriately, bursts into the chartbuster of the moment, Tip tip barsa pani. It’s a nice touch that this romance is treated very matter-factly, folded into the larger story with little fuss.) Like a typical American teenager from the movies, his lips are on hers and his hands keep fumbling on the strap of her dress. When he reaches home, however, he finds that his father has had a heart attack and needs to be admitted to a hospital, which means that his mother has to pawn her gold bangles. Karan, in short (as in Old Indian movies), is being punished for being “Western,” for not following his father’s footsteps, and perhaps even for thinking of sex outside of marriage.
And thus the film – which, for an entertaining stretch, seemed to showcase the triumph of New India over the Old – turns into the exact opposite, an old-fashioned morality play replete with a much-deserved comeuppance and a tiresomely overextended redemption arc. Karan’s descent to darkness isn’t convincingly charted, and Shahid, with his boyish behaviour, which includes cutenesses like crossing fingers each time he hopes for a positive outcome, is barely believable as a grownup, let alone a representative of a shining India who needs to learn lessons from an India that was not so shining. But he, like his film, has style and spirit, and that makes Badmaash Company an easy watch. The cast draws us in, especially Anushka Sharma, who’s very good in a part that calls, again, for a mix of Old and New India. She has no qualms about sleeping with her boyfriend or seducing a potential customer, but when Karan begins to stray over to distinctly un-Indian territory (namely, disregarding close friends, or desiring too much money, as opposed to wanting just enough), she draws the line. By the end, she’s even pregnant, a Mother India for a new generation – more liberal than Nargis, perhaps, but every bit as unyieldingly moral.

SEEING THE TRAVESTY THAT WAS Bride& Prejudice, a lot of us took to wondering how the director of Bend It Like Beckham, that sweet all-Indian fable, could have turned so tone-deaf to the rhythms of that honorary Indian Jane Austen (whose marriage-mad characters might well be set in the subcontinent). But after the enjoyably batty It’s A Wonderful Afterlife, I suppose it’s time to wonder how Gurinder Chadha was drawn to an empowerment saga like Bend It Like Beckham in the first place. Her talents seem to be those of a natural-born farceur, evident right from the opening minutes that detail a series of grisly murders, in London, by the “Curry Killer.” Newspaper headlines are ablaze with puns like “Police Dahl-lemma,” a victim ends up suffocated by chapatti dough, and there’s a great gross-out gag on an operating table that, literally, makes for an explosive beginning. Later, too, Chadha (with the help of the wonderful Sally Hawkins, playing a Brit who wants to be a Bharatiya nari) orchestrates a terrific send-up of the prom-night sequence from Carrie, except that this version involves flying food.
These highs, unfortunately, aren’t sustained in this story of an Austenian mother (a superbly harried Shabana Azmi) who wants to see her daughter (Goldy Notay) married off to a nice Indian boy. Also, in matters of satire, there is the difference between someone like Chadha, an outsider looking in, and, say, Dibakar Banerjee, an insider looking around and about. With the latter, we feel included in the joke, a part of the proceedings, whereas with the former, we feel as if on show, as if exoticised for a world audience. And yet, a healthy sense of the ridiculous helps us hang on. Even the supposed “moral” is endearingly daffy, especially as stated by a ghost whose pallor is beginning to peel, leaving behind the most unsightly of scabs: “Even fat people can find love.” It is then that you wonder if this director, with her unapologetically zaftig zeal, felt a kinship to her full-bodied heroine, described as having a “bottom like a buffalo.” Perhaps, beneath all the gags, this is an empowerment tale too. Perhaps Bend It Like Beckham wasn’t all that much an aberration.
Copyright ©2010 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Ramesh
May 8, 2010
the first film seems like sathi leelavathi without crazy mohan’s zaniness(whatever happenned to heera rajagopal?)
you absolutely HAVE to watch this trash huh?
B.H.Harsh
May 8, 2010
I somehow knew the morality bit in BC would earn a full-fledged paragraph from you.
I, for one, was constantly reminded of Bunty aur Babli (perhaps even more so because of the YRF connection). I couldn’t help remember how well it used its background and writing to have some fun. Badmaash Company seemed to be merely interested in “how they did it” and as the film came to its climax “how will they redeem”.
Still, I am glad you liked it better than Its a wonderful afterlife. Most of the other critics prefer the latter apparently.
FuckTamilCinema
May 9, 2010
‘Still, I am glad you liked it better than Its a wonderful afterlife. Most of the other critics prefer the latter apparently’
Nope, they trashed it more some critics actually liked BC
Deepauk M
May 9, 2010
Have you seen Happy-Go-Lucky? I was quite impressed with Sally Hawkins there.
Bollyfan
May 9, 2010
@Rangan sir : We disagree majorly on Badmaash Company. I found it too juvenile throughout.
@FuckTamilCinema : Only the likes of SKJ & TA liked Badmaash Company.
Lakshman
May 9, 2010
I guess a BR is not too far away for Irumbukkottai…Have been hearing some good things about it. Would love to hear your view about Pulikesi or have you written about it already?
Sidharth
May 10, 2010
***** SPOILER ALERT *********
What I do not understand about the ending of BC was that, after they decide to go legal and “redeem” themselves they commit one more crime.
They used information from within the Uncle’s company and bought stocks to get rich one more time and for the poor “Hero” to repay his friends. Isn’t that called “Insider Trading”.
I guess these aren’t very smart thieves after all. There are many such loopholes but none as stupid as this one.
brangan
May 10, 2010
Deepauk M: Nope. Haven’t seen a Mike Leigh film in a long time. The last, I think, was the mind-bogglingly awesome Topsy Turvy.
Lakshman: Is it good? I have the feeling it will turn out to be like Quick Gun Murugan. About ten decent belly-laughs, but not much more when stretched to feature length.
anamika
May 10, 2010
Hello Br,
Agree-the tone in a lot of the “indian films” made by indians looking from the outside often reduces to stereotyped characters and cliched color schemes!-(the same when we watch home grown ones makes us laugh at ourselves a little more loudly!)-and Chadha and the gang need to fine tune their fimaking skills…even their interviews are begining to sond the same…
and if you ahev been swamped by the likes of housefull, do catch kerala cafe , it is available on dvd and yes they ahve subtitiled it…!!
ramesh
May 10, 2010
the lastfilm this chick suggested was road, movie no?
;D
anamika
May 11, 2010
yes-ramesh, the chick who clucked about road,movie-that’s me
Kashif
May 11, 2010
I bet u havent seen this!
Venkatesh
May 11, 2010
What are you people all jabbering about ? Has anyone seen the masterpiece Guru-Shisyan ?
Ramesh
May 11, 2010
wha..chicks now object to being called chicks? what did yu do o the world when i was away at the seraglio with my odalisques?
Padawan
May 12, 2010
Venkatesh: I did. Yes it is a master piece. Especially, the relationship between Guru and Sishyan is far better than anything that you have every seen. Munna – Circuit can’t even match up to them, even in their dreams.
This is movie making at its best.
PS: You do such silly things when you go and buy AV and the shopkeeper thrusts this in your hand stating that it is after all 1 GBP and at the going rate, you are not losing much!
kamil
May 13, 2010
Rangan…Your audience truly deserve hearing your epic thoughts on Guru Sishyan – Any plans to bring yourself down to that level to watch it?
brangan
May 13, 2010
kamil: Oh? And want me to add some thoughts on Kutty Pisasu as well?
badmaash
May 14, 2010
great job badmaashi
divija
May 14, 2010
I LOVE Shahid Kapoor ALL FILM AND SEE SO MANY TIME kaminey 100 ANDjab we met 150 TIMES
mohit panwar
May 17, 2010
shahid good job
movie got slowed 3times
kissing was hardcorewith anushka
but it was good
Amar
June 15, 2010
Considering all the critic reviews mirchiplex gave it 2/5
http://mirchiplex.com/movie/badmaash-company