Does the success of ‘Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara’ indicate that multiplex audiences want their stories of redemption shorn of rough edges?
I did not review Zoya Akhtar’s multiplex hit Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara for this paper – and I didn’t have to. I’d already reviewed Wake Up Sid in 2009, where I wrote, “It has all the weight of a television commercial showing sad people transforming into happy people in the course of thirty seconds, which is to say that nothing ever seems to be at stake… Everything is frustratingly preordained.” And, “But these bits of growing up are tucked away into inconsequential corners of the film, in song montages and the like, so we’re mainly left with the incessantly happy-cheery story of a boy and a girl getting together after a series of extremely minor hiccups. That’s not a bad way to spend a couple of hours, sure, but how you wish a few dashes of reality had been allowed to temper this unrelentingly feel-good fantasy.” The heft of a television commercial. The minor hiccups. The feel-good fantasy. Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara has it all.

As did Rock On, in 2008, of which I wrote, “It’s really one of those white-collar wish-fulfillment fantasies like Shall We Dance, which equates happiness with putting home and career on hold while you go out and follow your heart and your passion.” It’s “a repackaging of a beloved Hollywood formula, and it needs [its] self-indulgent fictions in order to build to its patented uplifting ending.” And, “at least, if the film dealt honestly with the implications of these contrivances, we might have had something – but [the] direction takes its cues from the Farhan Akhtar School of Arty Disaffection, where being subtle appears to be the same as being scared to disrupt the clean composition of a scene with messy emotion. At times, this results in frames so lifeless, so juiceless, you’re not sure if you’re watching direction or art direction – a series of still lifes…” And, mainly, “But that’s a practical way of looking at life, and [this] is, above all, a story of dreams and dreamers.”
The point in recalling these older reviews is that with Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara we’re recalling these older films – and the film that birthed it all, Dil Chahta Hai, which, ten years later, is still the most affecting, most bracing, most honest coming-of-age film from modern-day Bollywood. Its descendants are happy to inherit its vibe, its coolness, its Indo-Western hipness, but elsewhere they are content to settle for easy epiphanies. The eponymous rich brat of Wake Up Sid resolves to leave home, but he instantly moves in with a girl-friend, the kind of friend who can afford to redecorate her house before she lands a job, and his existential crises thereon unfold at the level of his learning to fry an egg. And when it’s time to find a job, a few clicks with his digital camera are all it takes for him to discover he’s a terrific photographer, and he’s instantly employed at the same magazine his friend works at.
In Rock On, we are asked to empathise with a band that split up because their debut album represented a compromised vision. The fact that seven of the band’s songs had found their way into the album, with only the eighth number being a commercial compromise, the dark work of unsympathetically painted recording company executives, is presented as a monstrous deal-breaker, when, in reality, aspiring rock groups would be happy if they got to put out a single. And in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, the Abhay Deol character, Kabir, struggles to come to terms with his hasty engagement to Natasha, a girl he likes but does not love. Like Preity Zinta’s easily caricatured one-note boyfriend in Dil Chahta Hai, Natasha is fleshed out as an emotional manipulator, a suspicious nag, a clinger – and you have to wonder why so obvious a talent as Zoya Akhtar has to make it so easy to identify with this girl being dumped. We experience not a twinge when she is let go. She deserves it, we tell ourselves. Kabir deserves better.
The affluent characters in these films experience life-altering revelations with as much effort as sinking into a warm bubble bath. Or at least, the audience isn’t allowed to “see” too much of their discomfort; we’re simply asked to enjoy, vicariously, this angst-free acquisition of emotional truth, amidst plush production values that make us feel that we should all have these problems, these eye-catching problems, and their greeting-card solutions. (“Seize the day!” “Make the most of life, for we live but once!” “Smell the roses, and perhaps a couple of peonies too!”) Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara and Rock On and Wake Up Sid are well-crafted films, glutted with good writing and acting and startling moments of discovery, and that’s why it’s baffling that they excuse themselves from genuine emotion. What if Natasha were a really nice girl, really in love with Kabir, and has waited for him a long time, and then he — for whatever reasons (maybe he fell for someone else) — faces the unpleasant but manful task of telling her he wants out.
I suppose that would be too much real life for the multiplex audience, at least according to these directors, and it is probably to their credit that, at least occasionally, they spike their party punch with a splash of raw whiskey – the scene in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara where a son wilts under an understanding but unapologetic father, the scene in Wake Up Sid where Sid’s friend rues their estrangement, the scenes in Rock On where a practical-minded wife eggs her spaced-out husband to descend to earth. There is a superb moment in James L Brooks’ As Good As It Gets, an often rewarding and often frustrating drama, where Helen Hunt’s character is mother to an asthmatic son, and her date finds himself unable to handle the child’s spasmodic coughing. He leaves her home somewhat abashed, with the excuse that it’s too much reality for a Friday night. Could that be the thought driving these multiplex filmmakers, who want their audiences to experience, on their Friday nights, something borderline-real without rubbing their noses in reality?
These films, therefore, are enjoyable on a superficial level, at an easy level, with real-life wrinkles airbrushed away with the skill of a Playboy-centrefold designer. There’s no reason to invest in the outcome any more emotion than you’d invest in a nut-strewn candy bar. You close your eyes and chew and feel euphoric for a few minutes and toss the wrapper away and forget all about it. Who’s complaining when life lessons are so lip-smacking? And who will deny Zoya her success? She has learnt from the failure of her first feature, the commendable Luck By Chance, which laid bare the sweaty and dishonourable struggles behind professional success. It showed us what people can be like with their blinkers on and when they want something badly, and it made us squirm at the recognition of our own ethical compromises, which it reflected in an uncompromising glare – in other words, it was a little too much reality for a Friday night.
Lights, Camera, Conversation… is a weekly dose of cud-chewing over what Satyajit Ray called Our Films Their Films. An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2011 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Apu
July 30, 2011
Well…I really did feel that ‘Rock On!’ had a little more edge and touched me a lot more than WUS or ZNMD, but it might have been becuase the incidents that led to the band’s separation was at a time when the members were young, raw, immature, and wanted a lot more from life with no compromises. Even so, when a lot of people in the hall sniggered when Debbie (Sahana) mentions that nowadays her hands smell of fish when she had wanted to be a designer, I felt really sad for her. And I wanted to hit the sarcastic grins off Farhan and Hrithik’s face in ZNMD when Kalki was singing along with ‘I am a rock chick’ in the car…yeah, she is not like waht you want her to be…so be it!
But I see what you mean. It is as if the audience and subsequently the director, is scared to scrape beneath the surface of each character so as to not to confuse themselves, to keep the lines clean and discernible and give people just enough feel good balanced with dashes of reality to make them ‘feel good’ about themselves that they have watched a ‘realistic’ movie…so their good deed for that Friday/weekend/week is done. (“We have watched ZNMD, seemed like our story when we friends went out together, you know…or…watching it made me realize what I am missing out in life…or..really, I agree, you only live once.”)
But again, as you said, who should blame Zoya? I remember people going ballistically against KANK a few years back and blaming Rani’s character for cheating on a ‘perfect
husband’ like Abhishek, and that too with a grumpy loser like Shahrukh, who in turn, had a sexy and successful wife like Preity and instead chose the eternally weepy Rani. (I do agree that KANK definitely suffered also becuase it had too many tears, songs, colors, etc.). The audience probably did not want to be confused. The audience wanted the other parties to be either blacker, so that the protagonists’ actions were justified or, as in ‘Murder’, the protagonists to be portrayed as sinners who have bad things happen to them becuase of their sins.
Barring the current trend of Dabangg, Ready, Singham, Ghajini, etc, the multiplex audience would claim that formulaic movies with life size hero, virgin heroine, villains and songs mouthed by on-screen characters are dead. What they don’t realize is that the formula is still the same, it is just that there are now
a) more realistic sets with films being shot in location,
b) the “formula” is garnished with a couple of scenes of realism and
c) songs re played in the background instead of being sung by on-screen characters (and usually the music would be a bit western sounding)
and, the modern, english-movie-watching, bollywood-is-immature-and-unrealistic-commenting crowd can now suddenly ‘relate’ to these movies.
Sorry about the long comment…
Shankar
July 30, 2011
“There’s no reason to invest in the outcome any more emotion than you’d invest in a nut-strewn candy bar. You close your eyes and chew and feel euphoric for a few minutes and toss the wrapper away and forget all about it.”
To me, this resonated in a different context…modern day film music. The songs from today’s films all feel like fast food….enjoy for a short time and then erase them from memory. For example, I’d be hard pressed to recall 5 of Yuvan’s hits from the last 10 years while I could go on and on about the intricacies, BGMs, interludes etc from his father’s scores (Maybe it’s to do with age and nostalgia, perhaps!!).
bran1gan
July 30, 2011
Apu: Thank you for an excellent comment. I never thought of the Kalki moment that way, but now that you point it out, I do feel that I want to “hit the sarcastic grins off Farhan and Hrithik’s face”
And thanks also for mentioning KANK, which IMO is a terribly underrated film. It’s full of flaws (like you say, too much gloss and colour, and it goes on for too long), but there are moments that hit you in the stomach, and for its time its affair (the reason etc.) was shockingly “realistic” in a mainstream context. I wrote about it here.
I do think some filmmakers are unfairly treated like shit, while others are given a long, long rope. Another full-of-flaws film that deserved to be treated kinder in recent times is Guzaarish. Its legal scenes are laughable, but there are a lot of really good relationship moments.
Shankar: I completely agree that Raja >> Yuvan. I mean, it’s not even a consideration. But it’s also age da — the stage of life in which we heard and assimilated the great man’s songs. I wrote something long ago about the pre-teens/teens being the period things stick to you most, because we have all the time in the world and not a worry. But imagine if we were harried office-goers in the 1980s, who did not have the time to luxuriate in what you term “the intricacies, BGMs, interludes etc.” It’s a thought. We’re just very lucky that Raja happened to us in that phase, which is also why his music is “home.” There’s a nostalgia automatically built into listenings of his music — you remember everything from Vividh Bharati to school days to the “time” you heard such-and-such song first. That vividness of association is certainly not going to be there with Yuvan. Hmmm… vayasaachu!
That said, I doubt that a pre-teen/teenager of today will have that much association with Yuvan’s music either because we (and the MSV generation before us) lived in a non-fast food age. Life was quite slow then and there were no distractions. We used to listen to music for its own sake. Today the default mode of listening to music is while doing something else — cooking, driving, Facebooking, whatever. And I think a song will stick to mind less this way. Again, just a thought.
Shankar
July 30, 2011
Baddy, I agree with what you say, we listened to music with far fewer distractions…and today’s teens have enough distractions to keep them from truly appreciating it for what it’s worth. But I also have another thought. In my opinion, somehow, today’s music mostly feels plasticky…just not so real. Sure the vividness of association that you mention with what we heard in our teens is one reason why we just can’t seem to absorb today’s’ music in a similar fashion…but I’m also wondering if the electronic age and “fast food” composing techniques have somehow removed the sheen, the romanticism from music. For example, listening to a throbbing machine-generated rhythm accompanying a song just doesn’t seem to hold the same interest as much as a real drum kit, over a period of time. It just gets boring, especially when everyone can now do it…the individuality is lost.
And I agree, vayasaachu, machan!!
nimmiR
July 30, 2011
BR, [following Suchitra's comments to this post under ZNMD review] I too think you need to chill a bit about the multiplex and the star studded candy-loving peeps !! I mean like what you said a li’l while ago in ‘defense of the dark arts’ about books as hard candy vs. Henry Miller!! Let WUS and ZNMD be. They are immensely watchable and with some intricately woven moments to boot. Why cudgel? For every WUS we have a DEV D for the multiplex, no? For all I say I may be revolted by Singham [ btw the Hindi one, possibly ‘cos its was Surya in Tamil] but that’s the Spectrum out there… The more Singhams the more [or less] Gulals and rough edged cinema.
Frankly, KANK [ to the above comments] became unwatchable towards the end … the ‘affair ending in a Hotel room’ was a first time jolt for the audience who simply came in to watch the colors and KJ should have known better to nudge his audience away from marital bliss in this way!
I am saying this not because you are responding subjectively to a film but evaluating an audience from that bit of a distance, yeah? A bit of bile there about a complacent lot!!!
Lakshman
July 30, 2011
Offtopic – Since Yuvan is being discussed here and BR went gaga over the score of Aaranya Kandam, the main guitar theme which prominently features in the movie is a total rip-off from the evergreen Corrs hit ‘Toss the Feathers’FYI.
BR did you catch Deivathirumagal btw? Could understand why our emotion loving public went gaga over the kid’s and Vikram’s performance but not a word of appreciation so far for the kid who played Kodukkapuli in Aaranya Kandam. Once that happens, I guess Tamil cinema would have come of age.
jussomebody
July 30, 2011
I sort of agree with Nimmi, even as I feel you make many valid points, especially the bits about how the Natasha character turned out. You wonder why people don’t make movies about people like us you know, who live fairly comfortably in cities, with our kind of problems that may not involve necessarily feuding families and an aruvaal. In that respect, ZNMD is sort of closer to “our” lives, the kind of demographic that reads this blog (even if a lot more privileged than most of us), than any aruvaal story. So why such a big complaint?
I don’t agree especially with the WUS argument. If one of us decided to leave home or ended up being disowned, we certainly have fairly comfortable friends that we could move in with asap. And it is not impossible for us to have discovered a potential career by that time. I feel that maybe THAT is the scope for drama for those people in the story, people like you and me. Why is that not ok if that is what the film sets out to do, without inconsistencies? Just stories of normal life without too many high highs and low lows?
I get you, but maybe you are being just a little too harsh, is my overall point.
bran1gan
July 30, 2011
jussomebody: I don’t know that I;m being harsh — just voicing out my thoughts on a trend. It’s not that I didn’t enjoy these films at varying levels (some more than others), but they do make me wonder at their insistence on taking an easy way out. My point is simply that whe you’re trying to show a transformative arc, there needs to be a bit of struggle (in dramatic terms, conflict), and I don’t find it in these films. So for me they become a bit blah, despite their entertainment value in other respects. But if you’re able to treat them as just “stories of normal life without too many high highs and low lows,” then I guess good for you
nimmiR
July 30, 2011
@ BR, On these films being better more intense dramas, completely agree, but to sorta blame [slightly
] a multiplex audience for not liking too many highs and lows, don’t agree! Some films are able to push the envelope without razing down the multiplex, GM’s VTV, VA??…. coming to think of it It’s difficult to do both … I am happy there are so so many films now than ever, possibly because of the multiplex, sprinting towards irreverence…
bran1gan
July 30, 2011
nimmiR: Did you get the idea I was “blaming” this audience? Not at all. Was just trying to think out loud about the reception of these films…
Kabir
July 30, 2011
Stop the Nit picking man…enjoy the film..and have fun..!!
rameshram
July 30, 2011
so much apology for a film (genre) you didn’t create? Does such butt kissing help in bollywood journalism? is casey anthony guilty?!
nimmiR
July 30, 2011
I too am wondering about the rough edges not getting there unless candified!!! Yeah maybe blaming is not the right word but it seemed you were like fed up with the all the multiplexing and wanted some true grit to show up in mainstream cinema… btw I do agree with the stuff you say about these films but there are sunny side ups like the Delhi Bellis and Dev Ds and BBBs…
Abhirup
July 31, 2011
“Stop the Nit picking man…enjoy the film..and have fun..!!”
Sigh! Will these redundant comments ever stop?
Abhirup
July 31, 2011
Oh, and I forgot to add, Mr. Rangan, this is yet another blogpost that masterfully exposes the sheer mediocrity of this film. Thanks for this.
Nimisha
August 1, 2011
Very interesting post I must say ..I thoroughly enjoyed your views Bharadwaj..I watched the movie ZNMD and I have to admit I enjoyed it …and have decided to visit Spain next year
.. not that I am as rich as any of the characters in ZNMD .. but then again I did make plans to go to Goa after watching DCH … did not happen …Not yet at least. But it does feel good to want more from your life when you have a very routine life of Work-Home-Work. And I think there is more than enough reality for one to digest in the real world ..so then why would you want to dump more on the people who go to the movies for the entertainment ..for the few hours of escapism they are looking for to sit back relax and laugh/cry at some character on screen’s expense. And on the subject of Living your dreams ..I am married to someone like that…we left our well paying jobs in India to pursue his career in the Football industries in the UK…I agree life for people who follow their dreams is not a bed of roses the way they project in Cinema …but then again REEL life is not there to remind us how terrible it can be and to make us have second thoughts …its about giving us that glimer of hope to want that extra little bit more ..and Hope is what keeps us all going. If REEL life would constantly remind me how tough life is I probably would want to stop going to the Cinema altogether as I dont need to pay money that I work so hard for to put me down and give me the message that there is no hope at all. So as educated sensible “Mango People”(Courtesy:Love Aaj Kal), we should be able to pick and choose what we want to takeaway from these entertainers and what we want to leave behind at the Cinemahouse
.
Keep up the good work.
Abhirup
August 1, 2011
The only thing that I find more redundant than this film are the attempts to defend it.
Apu
August 1, 2011
It is interesting how, like a movie, a blogpost can be interpreted in different ways. BR, what made me reply to this post is the resonance with my opinion about movies like ZNMD, WUS, etc., which is:
- these are nothing more than feel-good movies
- there is nothing bad about enjoying feel good movies, because I agree with Nimisha above, every movie does not need to be realistic. And yes, it is good to see movies which deal with people like ‘us’ i,e. urban middle-class people. (though a 2-week long vacation in Spain can hardly be afforded with such glee by ‘middle class’ people)
- However, there is something very wrong about thinking that such movies are something better than the ‘ordinary’ masala movies, just because they show urban lives peppered with hallmark-type advice such as ‘you only live once’ or ‘follow your dream’.
This is entirely my opinion, that a feel-good or a masala movie can still be touching, sensitive and maybe life changing if it can manage to look beneath the surface and portray realistically the conflicts, the thought processes, the fears and fascination of the same ‘mango people’ that it seemingly talks about (BBB did it to some extent). However, movies like ZNMD do not anything like that.
Which is ok in itself.
Till the viewers start replacing ‘I enjoyed it’ with ‘It is an awesome movie. It makes me look at my life in a different way’ just because a character who has loads of money admits that money does not make him happy (why is it that in movies only a rich person gets asked that question?)
bran1gan
August 2, 2011
Apu: Of course interpretation (and over-analysis) is not restricted only to films but also to writings on film and to the comments on the writings about films. It’s an infinite loop. Though I wish people would get that when I say “real” i do not mean Smita-Patil-soaping-her-armpits-in-Chakra real but a more nuanced version (that Zoya is entirely capable of).
Shaitan
August 6, 2011
@Abhirup
You didn’t enjoy the film, we get it. You perhaps need not judge the comments of those who genuinely found the movie enjoyable?
Shaitan
August 6, 2011
“What if Natasha were a really nice girl, really in love with Kabir, and has waited for him a long time”
I can see if you had a problem with Laila’s shallowness, but what makes you think Natasha wasn’t a nice girl? Okay I admit, she wasn’t sweet-as-corn-syrup-nice a la Laila, but except for her bitchiness, she came across as a nice girl. She gels with his friends nicely, apologizes for her outbursts etc, for instance. Besides after marriage she wanted to be with Kabir, I can’t fault her at all there? Even after they’d split, she seemed pretty nice and friendly with Kabir too.
harikrishnan
August 7, 2011
sir i have to put some comments about rock on.i think the movie has provided explanation regarding their break up. not only the song thing but it is clear that something was soar between farhan and arjn before that.that is mentioned by purab in climax.also his request to consider his girl friend to do the costume section was rejected.she played an enthusiastic role in the activities of band and was integral part of band if not a member.also abhishek(director) doesn’t like to underscore things(my opinion only).but he has clearly shown if not emphasised what is happening,even their emotinal aspects too.if the movie has focussed more on making of music, it would be boring as a layman cannot relate to relate to it.
Abhirup
August 7, 2011
@shaitan:
I have no problem with anybody enjoying a film that I dislike. It is just that I read the two blogposts (the links to which are provided in this thread) where those bloggers have attempted to refute Mr. Rangan’s points and tell us what a grand film ZNMD is. And I find the arguments in both utterly unconvincing, their jibes at Mr. Rangan totally unjustified, and overall, I feel that neither convinced me in the slightest that ZNMD is any better than I found it in my two viewings. The smug tone and bad analysis in both prompted me to post my previous comments. Sorry if I offended you in any way. But I stand by everything that I have said.
guest
August 8, 2011
I’ve been told tamil speaking folk speak only tamil. So even when they are speaking in English, they first formulate their thoughts in tamil, then it quickly undergoes tamil->English translation in their heads, and they spit out the English equivalent of their tamil thoughts.
After reading your film reviews, I think it applies to reading as well. For instance, you are trying to read a hindi film ZNMD with your heart and head firmly stuck in Madras or Tamilnadu or wherever you guys are from. The realism or rough edge or whatever you demand is simply not necessary for regular urban hindi speaking folk. Objectively speaking, urban hindi folk including myself generally live on the surface. We don’t think so deeply nor so much, don’t feel the need for so much remorse or messy emotion or whatever you think would make znmd whole. We are quite ok with displays of affluence, we like a good song and dance and while our struggles may be blah and minor to you, we would say your struggles are too bleak and intense to us. Some of my south friends show me south hit films where in this day and age people yell and scream like brutes and ruffians, women are raped, mistreated, so much filth and disgust in the name of realism. And the people are positively ugly, unshaven and oily skin with gory costumes. No thank you baba. We are quite happy with our fluff.
Abhirup
August 8, 2011
See, this is exactly the kind of boorish, moronic comments that I am talking about.
Rahul
August 8, 2011
Guest’s comment is (unintentionally?) hilarious.
guest
August 9, 2011
Abe Abhirup, the language and cultural differences are very real. One can see examples on this very blog. Every week, this chap supposedly reviews hindi flick, but half the comments will be about some Ilyaraja and random youtube clip of south songs. What does all that have to do with the hindi film industry ? It is clear he is from the south, his thoughts, his analogies, his comparisons everything is with reference to some south films that no native Hindi speaking person would have ever seen. Nothing wrong with any of that. But you do realize that the hindi industry is not obligated to know all this. They make simple hindi fluff for native hindi crowd from dehradun and ghaziabad, not mysoor and madras. Akhtars are regular south bombay boys. Growing up they played gully cricket with the deols and the johars. Now they are writing roles around their youth experiences and casting their friends and relatives for those same roles. Zoya is not some Satyajit Ray who had mind-bending experience when he went to London to watch italian bicycle thief, came home pawned off wife’s jewelry and set about to rewrite Indian film history. Nor is she a David Dhawan with crass sensibility to make a govinda jump around with two wives in yellow shirt and red pants singing double meaning lyrics. She is a regular sensible 30 something twin sister of Farhan. She probably had 3-4 lovers, 1-2 heartbreaks, some random trips to switzerland hongkong usa. One day probably her plane has stopover in Madrid. She looks around at the art shops and tomato festival and whatnot. She weaves those memories into the standard hindi screenplay template on the macintosh. She chats up this abhay and hrithik at the juhu barista and offers all expenses paid 3 month vacation to spain. The result is this znmd. That’s how these movies come about. Nothing wrong with that also. It is quite adequate for consumption, and our hindi public has happily consumed it, in fact more than once I hear. Now you south people come along, asking why no depth why no breadth. You are saying my comment is hilarious but in the end the joke is on you only.
Abhirup
August 9, 2011
With every comment you post, you underscore the fact that you’re someone who can’t distinguish his arse from his ankle. Please continue posting your rants; they are hilarious indeed, and we love laughing at you.
nimmiR
August 9, 2011
+1. LOLing away…
Vishal
August 14, 2011
Absolutely loved reading this article.
raytracer
August 20, 2011
I was brought to this post through a link on Facebook and thought it was just another blogger ranting about a new release. Imagine my shock when I saw that you were actually a movie critic for Tamil Nadu’s biggest newspapers.
Your criticisms for the movie are pretty baseless. Are you annoyed that Natasha was made unlikable? Well, that’s how stories are. You don’t get to choose the characters. If they were any different, then the movie would have proceeded differently. That does not make the movie any less realistic. It’s made pretty clear that Abhay Deol’s character was unsure of the engagement (probably because of those flaws), and if he agreed to it all of a sudden, he can break it off just as quickly, especially when she behaves the way she does in the movie.
You talk as if this movie is based on some sort of fantasy and the characters are somehow unrealistic. On the contrary, this movie has some of the more realistic characters you can find in Indian cinema. For example, Hrithik is the typical banker who has lost his sense of humour and become more uptight because of the crazy demands of his work. The one big difference that makes people think that they’re unrealistic is that a large portion of the viewers probably cannot relate to them. This is very likely because the characters are clearly not representative of a large portion of the Indian population – they are far richer and lead completely different lifestyles. Your comment about affluent characters is actually true. Have you not read books by Wodehouse or seen movies like L’Avventura? It is human nature to get bored easily, and when one has his finances settled he is free to do what they want. Most people have to struggle for their daily bread and butter and cannot afford to be whimsical with their life choices.
What is your “real-life”? There are billions of people in this world, each different from the other. Do you want your movies to only have the hard working middle class hero, or the forever overbearing mother-in-law, or lovers trying to be split up by their famillies? India in the present day is inhabited by people living disparate lifestyles, and the movie focuses on a particular slice. It almost seems like a lot of your dislike for the movie stems from jealousy for the financially more well-off.
At some point, we have to admit that most mainstream Indian cinema is unimaginative and sappy. Films like ZNMD are such a refreshing change that remind you of what movies should be. They must not bore you and can provide food for thought. As you have yourself pointed out, it has a brilliant screenplay and production. It follows the lives of its protagonists for a few days and leaves it to us to fill the gaps, but provides us with sufficient details to do so. The inclusions of the poems is a masterstroke. It is not the movie itself that is superficial, but your analysis of it. Don’t let your limited worldview colour your opinion of a good film.
Abhirup
August 20, 2011
“Your criticisms for the movie are pretty baseless.”
Just because you don’t agree with them, doesn’t mean that Mr. Rangan’s points are baseless. That was a rude, not to mention immature, remark. Maybe you should remove your blinkers and read his take on the film once more. Trust me, it can work wonders.
“Are you annoyed that Natasha was made unlikable? Well, that’s how stories are. You don’t get to choose the characters.”
True, but if a character doesn’t work for him, I believe Mr. Rangan has every right to say so. Natasha’s character IS stereotypically bitchy,and is made too conveniently unlikeable, so that we can all clap and cheer when kabir finally dumps her. Of course, Zoya has the right to present Natasha in that manner. And Mr. Rangan, and those of us who share his views, have the same right to express our disapproval of this kind of one-dimensioal characterization.
“It’s made pretty clear that Abhay Deol’s character was unsure of the engagement (probably because of those flaws), and if he agreed to it all of a sudden, he can break it off just as quickly, especially when she behaves the way she does in the movie.”
The issue isn’t the sudden break-up, but, as I said, the fact that this break-up is made too easy to identify with and celebrate because Natasha is a flatly rendered jealous-and-possessive girlfriend stereotype.
“On the contrary, this movie has some of the more realistic characters you can find in Indian cinema.”
No.
“What is your “real-life”? There are billions of people in this world, each different from the other. Do you want your movies to only have the hard working middle class hero, or the forever overbearing mother-in-law, or lovers trying to be split up by their famillies?”
Nobody has said so. One has every right to make a film on affluent, upper-class people. Only, it must have a story worth our time and attention, characters worth caring about, situations that aren’t painfully contrived (such as, as Mr. Rangan pointed out, the sheer absurdity of kabir showing his girlfriend a ring and expecting her to understand that it is for his mom), and no easy, made-for-mass-consumption solutions to problems that CANNOT be solved that fast and neatly. Mr. Rangan doesn’t dislike ZNMD because it doesn’t have working middle-class characters, but because it is found wanting in all of the aspects I mentioned in my previous sentence.
“It almost seems like a lot of your dislike for the movie stems from jealousy for the financially more well-off.”
Stop being so nasty and mean just because Mr. Rangan doesn’t like a movie that you want to die watching.
“Films like ZNMD are such a refreshing change that remind you of what movies should be”
There’s very little that’s “refreshing” in ZNMD; its wannabe-cool nature is, in fact, the exact antithesis of refreshing. And if this becomes the manual for “what movies should be”, well, God help us.
“As you have yourself pointed out, it has a brilliant screenplay and production.”
Don’t remember Mr. Rangan using superlatives like “brilliant” to describe the screenplay of ZNMD. He did praise certain sections of it, like the interaction between Imraan and his dad, but he made it amply clear that overall, the screenplay is hardly brilliant. And I agree with him.
“The inclusions of the poems is a masterstroke.”
How, exactly? It came across as incredibly half-assed and pretentious, and the poems themselves were anything but memorable.
“It is not the movie itself that is superficial, but your analysis of it. Don’t let your limited worldview colour your opinion of a good film.”
Rude and immature once agin. Your personal disagreement doesn’t make Mr. Rangan’s analysis superficial. What IS superficial is your knee-jerk, how-dare-you-criticize-a-film-I-love-love-love attitude. And on what basis do you say that his worldview is limited? You don’t know him personally, you haven’t read enough of his writings (given that you initially mistook him for “just another blogger ranting”), and yet you arrive at a conclusion about his entire worldview? And that too just because he doesn’t like ZNMD? That ZNMD is a “good film” is your opinion, that it is not is Mr. Rangan’s. Where does his “worldview” come into the picture? I didn’t like ZNMD at all; I think it’s “good” bits can be edited and reduced to a ten-minute montage, and that the rest is tedious and shallow. But I am aware that this just my opinion, and I won’t make assumptions about your “worldview” or your nature on the basis of your love for the film. I suggest you learn to do the same. Learn a few lesson in decency, and accept the fact that there are people in this world who do ot hold the same opinions that you do. ZNMD is just not worth all the effort I put in in writing this comment, but there you have it.