Joss Whedon’s The Avengers – not to be confused with Jeremiah Chechik’s film of the same name, where Ralph Fiennes wielded an umbrella and saved the world from evildoers in candy-coloured teddy bear suits – is a mix of everything: of superheroes, of action and emotion and comedy, of staging that careens between prestige theatre and vaudeville, and of acting styles that span the spectrum from silent cinema to the modern day. To get an idea of the overall mood, you have to imagine something starring Buster Keaton, Spencer Tracy, Sylvester Stallone and Marlon Brando, and directed by Michael Bay and Sidney Lumet on a bank of giant green screens. That gleaming cube at the centre of the screen could well be the kitchen sink – though it’s really the Tesseract, a fearsome energy source, which Loki (Tom Hiddleston) wastes no time stealing, after which he proclaims, “I am burdened with glorious purpose.” For an instant there, the film itself seems freighted with glorious purpose.

Is there a better conductor of electricity up the spine than plummy villainy played with a British accent? Hiddleston, last seen in War Horse vanishing into a puff of smoke, creates such a devilishly theatrical character that we wonder not, as we usually do in these movies, whether the superheroes will be called upon to engage with a worthwhile supervillain, but whether this supervillain will be dispatched by superheroes worthy of him. And those heroes come in all shapes and sizes. There’s Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), the master archer, and Black Widow, whose prime power appears to be that she comes in the form of Scarlett Johansson. Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), who’d retreated to Kolkata to lead a stress-free existence (this is how we know we’re in the comic-book universe), returns with graying hair and a rumpled suit. Thor (Chris Hemsworth) reappears with his hammer, and Captain America (Chris Evans) shows up with his shield and a demeanour that could only come from being raised on a diet of apple pie.
Then there’s Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.), the magnetic core of the entire enterprise. Not since Harrison Ford slipped into Indiana Jones has an actor so memorably ingratiated himself with a playful part – he is introduced alongside Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), and their banter has a screwball-comedy vibe that sets the tone for the rest of his scenes. Downey, Jr. reminds us that special effects mean nothing unless the character inside the suit is a character, a fully formed human entity distinguished not just by a formidable superpower but by, say, the Black Sabbath T-shirt on his person (and, of course, Black Sabbath recorded a song named Iron Man). Downey, Jr.’s Iron Man has the distinct attitude that most other superheroes lack, and it’s tempting to imagine a movie-long contest between him and Loki, the winner being the actor who scarfs down the most scenery. He even punctures the pompousness of other superheroes, dismissing, for instance, Thor’s grandiloquence as “Shakespeare in the Park.” Even as he soars, Iron Man keeps The Avengers grounded.
Whedon takes a leaf from Iron Man’s manual and infects his film with a sense of mischief. Where Eric Bana and Edward Norton played glumly into the bifurcated angst of Hulk, Ruffalo locates a vein of slapstick comedy. There may even be a splash of unintended humour in watching Cobie Smulders (from the sitcom How I Met Your Mother) as a secret agent on what looks like the deck of the Starship Enterprise. It’s too drastic a change of image – we expect her to trip over Thor’s cape and rush red-faced to Johansson’s side to whine about the embarrassment over a glass of Canadian red. But Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), the director of S.H.I.E.L.D, is left with little to do. We’re promised an inscrutable character (“even his secrets have secrets”), but he’s content to blend into the wallpaper as the Avengers save the world from Loki’s minions, who arrive from outer space on ships that snake through Manhattan’s airspace like sluggish alligators after a noonday meal. Captain America wonders, at one point, if his stars-and-stripes costume isn’t old-fashioned. He’s told that, sometimes, “People might just need a little old-fashioned.” That The Avengers certainly is, resisting the modern impulse to peel back tormented layers of superhero psyche. What you see is what you get.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2012 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
omfgitsrohit
April 28, 2012
Nice review. I like your thoughts on the film but I’m not sure I got what you felt about it. Anyway, I was bored to death by the first half. The second half was predictable.
“Then there’s Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.), the magnetic core of the entire enterprise.” Agree with you there.
Ranjitha
April 28, 2012
Happy you devoted an entire paragraph to RDJ. I was just thinking about what a fabulous actor he is while watching Gothika, his comeback movie where he has the most meager of supporting roles. He’s memorable even when playing a glorified goon
KayKay
April 29, 2012
For me, The Avengers was Comic Nerd Nirvana, thanks to a wasted childhood devouring Marvel comics. I know these characters intimately, and the movie finally fulfills something all fans of Marvel and DC take for granted: that superheroes can and do cross over frequently into other titles.
Kudos to Marvel for taking control of (some) their characters back, and nurturing The Avengers through a prolongued prologue of 5 movies, and hats off to Joss Whedon for not pandering to those who come into the movie blind without any knowledge of 2 Iron Man, 1 Hulk, Thor and Cap America flicks each and for exhibiting a genuine love and respect for the source and genre.
The script is sharper and wittier than a lot of people are going to give it credit for. Take for example Loki. What greater weapon would a God Of Mischief (the Norse Naradar) have than in sowing discord among an already fractious and volatile bunch? RDJ is scenery-chewingly good, but IMHO, it’s Ruffalo ( a brilliant and cosmically underrated actor) who walks away with the honours as does The Hulk, finally coming into his own after 2 uneven efforts.
Popcorn entertainment at it’s finest and the best time I’m going to have at the movies until The Dark Knight Rises.
Now do excuse me as this gushing fan boy heads off to the second viewing (and maybe a third…)
Gradwolf
April 29, 2012
Haha yes, Starship Enterprise! Exactly what I thought with Nick Fury as Vader. LOL.
Bang on about RDJ though. As far as set piece action goes, I don’t think it can get any better than what they’ve done here. They chose to play to the galleries and not in a demeaning way but in a wholly win-some way. I must say I thoroughly enjoyed it and would love a rewatch in the first week. But I think in the last 2 years, X Men: First Class still comes out on tops as the more well thought out comic book film. Ahem..lets not get into TDK territory. There is another coming up in 2 months!
Kay Kay: Mark Ruffalo is terribly underrated, yes. Loved him in Zodiac and The Kids Are All Right and Bruce Banner is the biggest surprise of this film, isn’t he? I loved how the whole thing was built up to finally….Smash!
Gradwolf
April 29, 2012
Ok I just made a huge booboo. I meant Vader’s command fleet, Imperial Navy et al. Facepalm!
Krishna
April 29, 2012
Who still plays Galaga??
Anoop
April 29, 2012
“Not since Harrison Ford slipped into Indiana Jones has an actor so memorably ingratiated himself with a playful part ….”
Perhaps you forgot about capt jack sparrow ?
KayKay
April 30, 2012
Grad, in fact The Avengers is probably the most unabashedly fan-pandering flick to come out of Hollywood in awhile, kinda like Kollywood’s “star-vehicles”. Swaggering attitudes, “punch” dialogues galore, relentless self-referencing, championing of old-fashioned and conservative values, sibling rivalry and a hero who flies into a righteous rage, transforming him into a force of mass destruction.
If Cap gave the Black Widow a lecture about how nice girls from good families don’t dress in such skin-tight leather, and Widow and Hawkeye had themselves a romance, we could dub it in Tamil and give it a wide release.
“Vandhargal…Vendrargal”
Watching it again in 3D tomorrow…hope the conversion doesn’t suck.
AJ
April 30, 2012
“Watch your words. Loki may be beyond reason but he is an Asgardian and above all, he is my brother.”
“He killed 80 people in the last 2 days!”
“Err… he is adopted.”
For once… superheroes with a super-sense of humour!
prasunbanerjee
April 30, 2012
Watched the film on 3d and the 1st half was so dark and i was straining so hard to “see” the film that i just didnt enjoy the 2nd half … anyone else had any issue with the 3d ?
brangan
April 30, 2012
Ranjitha: Take a cold shower. Sit by the window AC. Rinse. Repeat
KayKay: I must introduce you to this comic-book-geek friend of mine. As for me, the film worked on a generic level, as I didn’t even know Renner’s character was a “good guy.” Just thought he was some random dude with a bow
Like Gradwolf above, I thought X Men: First Class was far better.
Gradwolf: That’s okay. Since you were probably born in 2006, such “booboos” are permitted. If I’d made the same mistake I’d have been guillotined
Anoop: Yeah okay, but those movies don’t really work for me, and Sparrow (though a memorable creation) becomes old really fast.
prasunbanerjee: Actually this was one of those films where I didn’t have a problem with the 3-D. I usually do, but not this time.
Alpesh Patel
April 30, 2012
I may have misinterepreted what you were saying in the review, but the thing that worked for me most in The Avengers was that there was no central main character, so I disagree with you when you say that RDJ is the magnetic core.
If anything the main character is Loki.
What saves The Avengers from being boring is the lack of detailed back story, it felt like a case of “If you want to know more, go watch that other film”.
I also thought that this was the best possible film that could have been made about The Avengers and I credit Joss Whedon for that, utilising his writing abilities to great effect.
Hugely enjoyable film and am yet to find someone who has not liked it
Gradwolf
May 1, 2012
2006 born ah? Ipdi kandapadi kalaichteengale!
The Nolan fanboys cult, second only to Apple fanboys cult, rises again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8evyE9TuYk
Anurag
May 1, 2012
Yes I had the same problem and i figured the reasons- 1) First of all it is converted 3D so night scenes suffer badly 2) Some cinemas have darker 3D glasses than some rare ones which are cool…I happened to be in the former type, not to mention cinemas with low brightness projectors will further add to the pain 3) The biggest reason is that this film is shot in 1.85:1 aspect ratio which means that image wont fill the entire screen horizontally- this leaves major part on the LR sides of glasses dark, which further darkens the main image. Suggested solution is to sit as front as possible to watch this film. 4) O a side note, Film is pretty long and keeping glasses on for that duration will naturally give a headache- not everyone can make a film true spectacle like avatar to allow oneself to ignore that pain.
Ilamparithi
May 3, 2012
prasunbanerjee: 3D sucked for me too. I felt in addition to being darker, it also made everything smaller. In some scenes I removed the glasses and Hulk was so big without the glasses. So far I am not satisfied with any 3D movies I have watched recently. ‘Pirates…’ was the worst. I wanted to watch this in 2D. Unfortunately all the nearest screens were playing in 3D.
tejas
May 3, 2012
“After seeing the film, I discussed her (the Black Widow) with movie critics from Brazil and India, and we were unable to come up with a satisfactory explanation for her superpowers; it seems she is merely a martial artist with good aim with weapons. We decided maybe she and Hawkeye aren’t technically superheroes, but just hang out in the same crowd.”
- Ebert in his Review of The Avengers, http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120502/REVIEWS/120509997
Would that Indian critic be you?
rameshram
May 6, 2012
the film bored me. I thought the monsters in transformers dark side of the moon were scarier.
batman begins trailer was good, though.
rameshram
May 6, 2012
looks much better in imax 3d.
brangan
May 8, 2012
tejas: No, not me. How does one even get in touch with him, BTW?
tejas
May 8, 2012
Are you saying all you critics don’t have a secret society members of which get in touch with each others through ham radios tucked in cellars? Wow!! Then probably Facebook and/or emails are the only ways.
rameshram
May 8, 2012
you walk up to his wheelchair at cannes an say hello
KayKay
May 9, 2012
.not to mention supply him with pen and paper so he can communicate:-)
rameshram
May 10, 2012
kay kay,
you sound like you were actually there , and gave him a pen and paper.
KayKay
May 11, 2012
Well, after the tumor on his lower jaw that’s robbed him of verbal speech since 2006, I kinda made that elementary deduction…
http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310
rameshram
May 11, 2012
oh he tried bravely to talk even with his “condition” with that stephen hawking device…the thing that looked like he was shaving his neck…
Aditya Krishnan
May 12, 2012
BRangan, saw it three times, all in 3D, each time in a different cinema better than the previous one, and came away after the third one feeling that the 3D effect is best if the movie’s seen on a big as hell imax screen. Even the lighting isn’t too much of an issue then..
I’m actually surprised that in spite of there being so many comments above, there’s not a mention of the scene with the Hulk and Loki !! For me, RDJ is consistently brilliant, but the Hulk just nails every scene he shows up in!