DUM
JAN 30, 2003 – THERE’S A LOT ABOUT DUM THAT REMINDS YOU OF ARJUN, one of the best attempts at portraying the post-Bachchan Angry Young Man, specifically the chawl-resident father who’s middle-class weakness personified and the son who rages at the corruption around him. The difference is that Arjun had Sunny Deol fighting the System; Uday (Vivek Oberoi) here is simply trying to shake off ‘Encounter’ Shankar (Atul Kulkarni), a corrupt cop who stands in the way of his becoming a police officer.
It’s not as if Uday’s out to rid society of corrupt cops. Like Vikram in the original (the Tamil hit Dhil), he’s just a guy-next-door with friends who take puffs from the same cigarette and a family that dotes on him. He wouldn’t even have met his nemesis had Kaveri (Diya Mirza, looking very pretty in the standard ‘hero’s girlfriend’ role) not sounded off Shankar while the latter was making a public nuisance of himself.
This it-could-happen-to-anyone scenario makes you empathise with Uday’s plight, especially after witnessing the simple pleasures in his life, like his charming meet-cute with Kaveri and their expression of love, with Singin’ in the Rain style abandon, to the strains of Sandeep Chowta’s tuneful Jeena.
Atul Kulkarni plays Shankar with an interesting combination of vulnerability — “Yeh daag mit to jayega na,” he quaveringly asks the doctor who patches up a facial wound — and scenery-chewing gusto. Vivek Oberoi, in the latest of his impressive early resume of ‘hatke’ roles, is perfect as the tough-as-nails brain-brawn combination — “[Mujhe] Maar daal varna bahut pachtaayega,” he warns the cop who’s beaten him to a pulp. And the initial standoffs between these two, like an episode revolving around Uday’s sister’s wedding, are excitingly handled by director E Nivas (whose Shool explored a similar canvas).
But post-interval, after the framework for the cat-and-mouse that will form the rest of Dum has been laid out, Nivas loses his touch, and a film that was taut and muscular like its coiled-intensity protagonist turns flabby with commercial compromises and hero-glorification.
The law-abiding middle-class qualities that warmed us to Uday – he recites from the Hanuman Chaleesa — vanish as he begins to dispense vigilante justice, with hard-rock guitar riffs wailing in the background. Forget Arjun comparisons, he’s now Rambo, who continues fighting even after getting shot.
We’re now in a universe where only Uday and Shankar matter. All interesting supporting characters either vanish or show up as clichés like the corrupt politician, the selfless best friend (Sushant Singh, wasted in this role), the honest cop who’s mentor to the hero, the ruthless killer who laughably switches sides, and the pregnant sister who’s perfect target for the bad guys. Why have the chawl setting if the residents there aren’t going to be used as colourful props and are simply there for group dances? Even Kaveri disappears; instead of her mandatory duet, we have Yana Gupta shaking booty to the raunchy Babuji Zara Dheere Chalo.
What begins as an engrossing against-all-odds story ends up as a violent, overblown Clash of the Titans. Some of the action is rousingly choreographed, but you can’t help feeling that there was a lot more dum in the film when the muscle factor was a lot less.
Copyright ©2003 The Economic Times: Madras Plus
brangan
March 1, 2008
Just realised, after a beer-conversation (beerversation?) with a friend, that I just completed five years as a film critic. This one appeared on JAN 30, 2003, a time I was using words like “hatke.” Yikes 🙂
LikeLike
Vishal
March 1, 2008
Congrats, Baradwaj! The film industry is enriched by your presence. Just curious and if you don’t mind answering, what did you do before you decided to become a film critic?
LikeLike
Sagarika
March 1, 2008
brangan: “Yikes”? And here I was thinking you meant it sincerely when you said “I guess, as you grow older, you become more forgiving of the follies of youth” (Jethro Tull piece). 🙂
Btw, I guess it takes a lot of gumption (“Dum”?) to, after five years, (heard we can “officially” split infinitives now, phew) continue to put your stake in the ground doing what you do best. Way to go!
LikeLike
brangan
March 1, 2008
Vishal: Thanks, but I hardly belong to the “film industry.” 🙂 My fraternising is limited to the interviews I do. Before this, there was a bunch of things — a few years of advertising, engineering, sofware, and a particularly great year of doing nothing and being a bum. I highly recommend the latter as a cure for the career blues.
Sagarika: Yeah, but ‘hatke’ is Stardust lingo for crying out loud. And no gumption and all. Just a strong aversion to a corporate career.
LikeLiked by 1 person
s
March 1, 2008
Was this the first review you wrote? Sorry, it was not clear.
We have just been catching glimpses of your career path. One day, I hope you will find enthu to write about it. Road less traveled by…
LikeLike
s
March 1, 2008
“Sorry, it was not clear’.. – it was not clear to me whether this was your first review
LikeLike
rahul
March 2, 2008
hi
i got the link of ur site from desipundit last week and already “finised” the whole site,i really like ur reviews.
Also,good to know that you were also a software engg,giving exams of film institues this ye,hope some day u will review my movie
LikeLike
brangan
March 2, 2008
s: Yes, this was my first published review.
rahul: Thanks man. Now go forth and make some great films 🙂
LikeLike
Sagarika
March 5, 2008
brangan: “…giving exams of film institut[e] this year” — Are you? And where on earth would rahul have stumbled upon that bit of info about you?
LikeLike
brangan
March 5, 2008
Sagarika: Not me. He’s the one giving the exams.
LikeLike
Chandra
March 6, 2008
Brangan
UR site is awesome, i have become addicted to this site, that i come to this site to read the review once a new film is released!!!!.
but request you to write reveiws of tamil films and new tamil film albums in tamil. at least the prominent ones….
LikeLike
abishekspeare
January 30, 2020
Reading this now is like going back to your facebook page and wondering “Oh, was I really like this”. BR has grown from strength to strength ever since. And reading this in 2008 I thought film analysis can’t get better than this. Here’s to (more than) 17 more years of BRamayana
LikeLiked by 1 person