GHAJINI
OCT 7, 2005 – THE FIGHT SEQUENCE AT THE CLIMAX of a Tamil masala movie is truly the gladiatorial combat of our age – you know the movie has worked when the inevitable good-guy-bad-guy fistathon happens and you’re baying for the bad guy’s blood. You’ve been appalled by all the bad things that have happened to the good guy – think Kaakha Kaakha, to name a recent example – and you don’t want the bad guy to merely die, you want him to die after being ground to pulp, bloody pulp.
By that yardstick, Ghajini just didn’t do it for me. When hero Sanjay (Suriya) finally takes on villain Lakshman (a bland Pradeep Rawat) and his twin – the latter is a sorry add-on to the story; he exists solely so that the special effects guys can have fun sending two bad guys flying into the air instead of one – I just sat there deadened, partly because my ears had lost some hearing thanks to Harris Jayaraj’s deafeningly overdone soundtrack, and partly because the initially-intriguing premise had long since degenerated into an utterly generic masala. (The only difference is that there’s no separate comedy track; we have to make do with howlers as when a cop looks at a phone number and brilliantly deduces, “Indha number-la ten digits irukku. This must be a cell phone number.”)
In a gimmick borrowed from Memento, Sanjay suffers from short-term memory loss – every fifteen minutes, his memory becomes a blank slate; so if he, say, met someone fifteen minutes ago, the sixteenth minute he’s forgotten who that person is. How fascinating, then, that such a character should go about avenging a loss that he doesn’t even recall much of – can’t you imagine director Shankar salivating at this high-concept! – while being helped by a medical student (an annoying, overweight Nayantara, whose rolls of fat appear to be doing a Mexican Wave across her waist in a song sequence!
For attempting such a twisty narrative within the confines of commercial cinema – as well as for injecting some socially-relevant elements (as he did in the far superior Ramana) – director Murugadoss is surely deserving of the cinematic equivalent of the Param Vir Chakra. But why does such a well-intentioned and obviously talented filmmaker – when Sanjay’s diary is read for the first time, its contents are detailed in a flashback; when it’s read again by another character, the same events zip by as if in fast-forward mode, as if this character is getting a crash course in the truth – feel the need to include not only scenes of severely sadistic violence, but also a cringe-inducing moment wherein the villain shoots a bystander dead, and afterwards, strips her, exclaiming that she won’t feel the shame anymore?
For all the novelty in Ghajini, the part that works best is the most old-fashioned – the romance between Sanjay and Kalpana (the very pretty Asin, who grates a bit initially, but settles down quickly to become the film’s most memorable character). Harris Jayaraj’s foot-tapping numbers (Oru maalai ilaveyil neram is a beauty) could have been shot better, but they do add that extra zing to these portions that are funny, charming, and thoroughly entertaining.
More than in anything he’s done so far, Suriya shows he can do relaxed romantic comedy as well as it can be done. But the poor man is unfortunately stuck in an action movie, and he’s obviously bulked up for it, so he also has to – unbelievably for his character, that of Chairman of a company – pulverise twenty goons single-handedly. And that’s when you see that the problems in Ghajini aren’t as much due to the writing or the directing as with the perception (and the presentation) of the hero – sorry, Hero – in Tamil cinema. Whatever the story, whatever the role, he – sorry, He – has to be not just a man, but a Superman.
It wasn’t always this way. Long before Memento, there was a Tamil movie that featured an (anti)hero who was not quite there mentally, and whose tragic, violent story was teasingly pieced together through the course of the film. That, of course, was Sigappu Rojakkal, and there’s a scene here that looks like a direct homage – when a character enters the hero’s room and finds scribblings all over the walls that alert her to who he really is. For its time, Sigappu Rojakkal was a slick, successful thriller, and it didn’t have a pumped-up steroid boy at its centre. It just had a scrawny Kamalahasan in bell bottoms.
Copyright ©2005 The Economic Times – Madras Plus. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Vishal
December 20, 2008
Hopefully, the errors of old Ghajini are corrected in the new one. The central theme of this movie was very appealing and interesting but all the bells and whistles that Murugadoss tried to add didn’t work for me.
LikeLike
Arun
December 20, 2008
not that I particularly like him but what the heck is Aamir doing acting in, and probably ghost directing its remake?!!!
LikeLike
nj
December 21, 2008
“an annoying, overweight Nayantara, whose rolls of fat appear to be doing a Mexican Wave across her waist in a song sequence!”
well….a lot of “waves” have passed under the bridge since then i guess..:)*lol*
LikeLike
Hari
December 22, 2008
Watched it just a month ago…..found it terrible-as an entertainer, as a commercial potboiler and as an adaptation of memento…..I fail to understand what the gaga when the movie released was all about…..I remember many of my friends getting their head shaven to sport the Ghajini cut.
LikeLike
Elizabeth
December 22, 2008
I thought the film started out well enough and then descended into too much filmi absurdity.
Interesting that you thought Nayanthara was annoying and Asin was good. I found Asin incredibly annoying and Nayanthara not great, but tolerable (so, she was overweiight, while Asin was pretty. So what?).
I don’t know who’s to blame, the actress or the writers, but by the time Kalpana was brutally killed, I had had about enough of her and wanted to thank the villains for sparing me the trouble.
First it was Asin’s over the top perkiness that grated and then it was how they were trying to pass the character off as the second coming of Mother Teresa or something.
Helping disabled children? Walking a blind man across the street with commentary on everything she sees? Saving children on the train? Really? Does she also have magical healing powers that could bring about world peace?
It’s one thing to have characters who are good people, but the way it was done with Kalpana had all the subtlety of a sledgehammer.
I kept thinking, “Yeah, yeah. She’s just awesomely fantabulous. We GET it!”
Never really understood the hype about this movie or Asin.
LikeLike
brangan
December 22, 2008
Elizabeth: “Interesting that you thought Nayanthara was annoying and Asin was good.” Must have been the big screen effect 🙂
Because when I caught on Tv sometime back, I thought both were quite annoying, though I must Nayantara’s character was so ridiculous and brainless, she had the edge over Asin’s manufactured perkiness.
But Suriya in the flashback still worked for me. He was pretty good.
LikeLike