‘MY STRENGTHS ARE THE VISUALS, NOT WORDS’
Shaji Karun’s first film was about a commoner. His forthcoming feature is about Raja Ravi Varma. The filmmaker talks about aspects of this interesting journey.
APR 23, 2006 – TYPE IN WWW.SHAJI.INFO AND you’ll be greeted by the photograph you see in this story. If this isn’t a worthy entry point to the web site of a renowned cinematographer, I don’t know what is. That’s Shaji Karun, corkscrewing himself towards us. But this pose is hardly as unusual as that handrail to his left, an electrocardiogram in metal winding past an eerie blue light from a window before disappearing into a gaping mouth of nothingness. “It means a lot to me, the way you look at a picture,” says Karun, when I ask if this picture means something. All he’ll say is that he was filled with a strange kind of emotion at this location, a church in Switzerland. “I felt this moment should be captured.”
Ever since he graduated from the FTII with a degree in cinematography, Shaji Karun has been capturing moments, not merely images. “I am influenced by Aravindan, with whom I’ve worked with on several projects. His films say a lot through silence instead of dialogue, so what you see on screen aren’t just pretty pictures. They are the primary means of communication.” That remained the philosophy when Karun decided to turn director in 1988 with Piravi (Malayalam). (He’d made a few shorts earlier.) “It’s about a father waiting for his son. The son is, in a sense, the main character, but he’s not shown at all. Instead, I tried to tell the story with the help of visuals – the rain, the river, the storms, the skies…”
The universality of these visuals is possibly rivalled only by the universality of the acclaim for the movie. Piravi was widely hailed as the most stunning feature film debut in the country since Satyajit Ray burst on the scene with Pather Panchali. Cannes awarded it the Camera d’Or, for best feature film by a first-time director. It won the Silver Leopard at the Locarno International Film Festival. (Trivia note: The bronze that year, for Where is the Friend’s House?, went to an Iranian filmmaker named… Abbas Kiarostami, who wasn’t quite the art house darling he is today.)
It’s perhaps inevitable that Piravi turned out the masterpiece it is. After all, 15 years of training and preparation went into it. “It took me that long to get ready, to convince myself that I could direct,” says Karun, who, even at the FTII, realised that cinema is essentially a director’s medium. It didn’t matter that by the age of 24, he had on his mantelpiece the National Award for cinematography – for Aravindan’s Thampu. What he really wanted was to make movies from his own point of view.
But Karun doesn’t dismiss the years he toiled as cinematographer (for the illustrious likes of Aravindan, George and Vasudevan Nair). “A filmmaker is like a doctor,” he says, and the analogy isn’t as strange as it first appears when you learn that he got an admission to a medical college in Trivandrum, to do his MBBS. “But who is a doctor? He is one who knows about the whole of the human body, and who then goes on to a specialisation.” Now you know where the analogy is headed. “Similarly, a filmmaker has to have knowledge about all of cinema, whether he wants to end up as cinematographer or director. Even as cinematographer, I would look at something the director did and ask myself how I would do it if I were in his position. All this training helped me.”
But once Karun decided to take the plunge, things came together quickly. He got a loan from the NFDC. He made the film. And he got the luckiest break when it was picked up by Cannes. Piravi was released across Europe and proved a big success. Since then, though, he’s made only three features – Swaham (1994), Vanaprastham (1998) and Nishad (2002). “In the earlier days,” Karun says, “I needed about Rs. 6 lakh to make a movie. That’s how much Piravi cost. Now it would cost almost Rs. 60 lakh. Almost ten times more.” It makes you think a minute, that this amount would merely cover the costs of Kareena Kapoor’s wardrobe in a Karan Johan production – but Karun doesn’t have any issues with mainstream cinema. “That’s an entertainment, and human beings need entertainment.”
Besides, it’s a mainstream producer – Bobby Mangal Pandey Bedi – who will finance Karun’s next film, “a human passion drama that looks at Raja Ravi Varma from the point of view of a model from Maharashtra who inspired him.” Varma was apparently 35 when he met this muse, and after this meeting his painting is said to have acquired a different dimension. “What does it mean for a human being to be inspired?” asks Karun. “There’s a lot of information available today about Raja Ravi Varma, but not about the model. There was a scandal involving the nudity. She ran away and he went in search of her. That’s the story.”
At the moment, Karun wants Ajay Devgan as his leading man. But he’s still writing the screenplay and he says he doesn’t approach actors till he completes the writing process. “That’s because I don’t want the person in front of me to influence the characters I am writing.” But it’s Vishal Bhardwaj who’s writing Karun’s other project, based on a T Padmanabhan short story called Kadal. “Sometimes, I ask others to write,” says Karun. “I give the ideas, but my writing skills aren’t very good. My strengths are the visuals, not words.”
Sometimes, those words are not in Malayalam. Sometimes, as in Nishad, those words are in Hindi and Pali. The film was set in the Himalayan regions, in a Buddhist settlement, and Karun says, “My idea of language is that it should reflect where the actions take place. Language is a part of the landscape.” And now, in the Raja Ravi Varma project, though the artist is from Kerala, the film is set in Mumbai. So Marathi and Hindi will be part of the landscape. In any case, Karun feels the language shouldn’t be a deterrent in today’s multiplex scenario. “The multiplexes are great, even if they are only in the metros. The audience has begun patronising different kinds of cinema, and there’s hope that we may again see a period like the 70s, when all kinds of films were being made and everyone was enthusiastic about watching them.”
Karun hopes to start shooting by the end of the monsoon and finish in time for an October 2 release. That date marks the centenary of Raja Ravi Varma’s death. If it appears that there’s very little time between June and October, Karun says, “Once my screenplay is ready, I need only 45-50 days of shooting, and my post-production takes very little time.” And it must help that he’s been working on the movie for the past two years. “My first draft was only about Raja Ravi Varma. The second draft, I wrote from the viewpoint of the model. The third had location details. Now I’m onto my fourth draft of the screenplay, which even has details of the sound design.”
Karun says he can afford to take this kind of time with his films because he’s never considered cinema as something to earn his livelihood from. “For that, I just go and photograph someone else’s movies. Or I make short films, like the one about a blind man who did embroidery. For me, cinema is a craft. So I wait until I can make the movies I want to.” So does that make him a cinematographer first, a director later? Karun doesn’t hesitate. “Just call me a filmmaker.”
Copyright ©2006 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
DPac
May 27, 2008
Nandri thalaivare…
but kind of surprised that you didnt delve more.. hmmm
LikeLike
Sagarika
May 28, 2008
brangan: Shahid Kapur, I know. But Shaji Karun? Well, I guess I do now. And what a delightfully unusual photo this is…surely, a picture that’s worth a thousand words!
But on the other hand, tomorrow, if this photo goes up in a puff of smoke (as I’ve known photos do from this space, sporadically), I’m convinced I’ll have no issues recreating in my mind’s eye this lovely shot, of “Shaji Karun corkscrewing himself towards us,” in all its sepia-tinted glory, not to mention its “minor” embellishments: “..[the] unusual handrail to his left, an electrocardiogram in metal winding past an eerie blue light from a window before disappearing into a gaping mouth of nothingness.” Just reading this oh-so-beautiful description made my heart skip a beat (not to mention the ECG metaphor). ‘My strengths are the visuals, not words.’ That may be Shaji Karun, but evoking rich images through words must surely be one of your finest strengths.
“I felt this moment should be captured.” And whether the capturing happens through a photograph or via words (way more difficult, IMO), isn’t the effect the same? — pure magic.
I really enjoyed reading this “smashing Bala quote”-inspired (or was it Heller’s Something Happened?) move from the old site.
In the world of excesses that’s cinema today, it’s certainly refereshing to happen upon those who seem to redefine rules by firmly believing that less is more.
p.s: Did Karun’s Ravi Varma movie make it? An interesting bit of trivia, that model serving as Varma’s muse. Haven’t heard of Piravi either. I must be inhabiting a parallel universe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DPac
May 28, 2008
@sagarika
piravi, swaham, vanaprastham – must watch (although i did hear rather caustic stuff about AKG, and i havent seen Nishad)
LikeLike
brangan
May 28, 2008
Sagarika: There’s been no news of that Ravi Varma movie, though Ketan Mehta is coming out with *his* version of the Ravi Varma story.
DPac: I don’t think anyone’s seen Nishad. It appears to be one of those films that wasn’t even played much in festivals and such.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
May 28, 2008
I’ve only seen Piravi during the days when Doordarshan showed naional award winning movies on sunday afternoons (what happened to that?). I don’t remember much about the film except that even though I saw the film with subtitles, I was deeply moved. The one visual I vaguely remember is Premji in a spotless white mundu sitting in the verandah (or was it the window?)with lush greenery in the background and the sound of raindrops.
In some ways (thematically perhaps) it was similar to Saaransh, but with a very different sensibility. Saarash was melodramatic, while Piravi was subtle. Before anyone gets the wrong idea that i am dismissing Saaransh, let me tell you that I liked both the heightened emotions of Saaransh as well as the understated sombreness of Piravi.
LikeLike
Deepauk M
May 28, 2008
Apparently Rita Hayworth said ” Men go to bed with Gilda, but wake up with me”. That’s the first thing I thought of while watching Vanaprastham. The only reason I got to see that was because Mohanlal was in it, i dont even know where to look for Piravi or Swaham. I believe he is working on “Kutti Shranku” next. Hopefully I’ll get to see that.
LikeLike
Govinda
May 28, 2008
Excerpt from an interview with Shaji Karun(April 26 The Hindu)
Shaji, incidentally, is currently working on an interesting project, Suryamukhi. This is his Hindi feature on the last six years of Raja Ravi Varma’s life. It stars Vidya Balan and Madhavan.
On Suryamukhi
“In his last years, Varma turned a printer — a businessman rather than an artist. It marked his failure. It is also about his association with wine and women,” he shares. Made with “extensive research”, and against the backwaters of Kerala, the film’s budget is 3.35 crores. The film will go on the floors in November, he adds.
LikeLike
Vighnesh Hampapura
July 8, 2016
I came to this from Abbas Kiarastomi’s tribute. How could I have missed it. I usually search my favourites in your blog. Excellent interview, as always. I have watched two of his films – Vanaprastham and Swapanam, both wonderful wonderful movies. The images, like he said are his strength and they do convey so much, and the refreshing bit of his films are the images and the style they are presented in are very much Indian. There is no borrowing of Western templates, unlike many of his art-cinema companions. Vanaprastham has remained, and will remain one of my favourite films – it has art, and is art. Isn’t that enough? 🙂
LikeLike