SON OF A PITCH!
A street-cricket saga from a bunch of no-names comes out of nowhere and knocks your socks off.
MAY 31, 2007 – WEâVE SEEN films that caution us to stay away from liquor, weâve seen films that indicate the badness inherent in a villain by zooming in on the bottle of VAT 69 by his side, and weâve seen films where a few local guys celebrate by congregating rowdily at the booze shop by the street corner â but have you ever seen a film that touches upon the empathetic aspects of alcohol consumption? Iâve just seen one, and itâs the terrific Chennai 600028. Thereâs this song Vaazhkaya yosingada â the one in which the choreographerâs instructions surely went (a) act as if you are scratching away a bad case of the itches on your torso, (b) now, raise your hands above your head and make batwings â where a hurt-in-love youth is drinking and moaning (in verse, of course) about the faithlessness of women, and at one point, he turns his half-full glass upside down, as if even that cannot fix him up again, when one his friends nearby holds out his glass and rescues the drink. (You can almost hear the latter think: Machaan, girls will come and girls will go, but why waste perfectly good whiskey?) Itâs one of the most sacred of coming-of-age rituals, drinking with your closest friends â which is why you really feel for a character when he is shown drinking all alone â and Chennai 600028 captures it beautifully, never more so when one of these boys returns home in the morning after a night out drinking, and his worried elder brother hauls him up: âEnna thanni adichaalum night veettukku vandhu seru.â? If that isnât empathy, I donât know what is. Going by the envious sighs of the younger siblings in the audience, if someone ever decides to remake Sivaji Ganesanâs Annan Oru Kovil, hereâs a candidate for the protagonist.
With the awesome load of positive reviews for this street-cricket saga, I stepped into the movie hall expecting a goofy lark â something that would make for an amiable two-plus hours (it doesnât really pay to expect much more in Tamil cinema these days) â but first-time director Venkat Prabhu made me imagine a batsman making his ODI debut, swinging wildly at the opening delivery and scoring, if not a six, a goodish four. Nothing â and believe me, nothing â will prepare you for the sheer genius of the closing sequence, which, perhaps not coincidentally, harks back to a bet match for… booze money. (There â alcohol again! Can there be any doubt, now, that the cast and the crew went bar-hopping â or, at least, TASMAC kadai-hopping â to celebrate the filmâs success?) Chennai 600028 is about the rivalry between the Sharks, the cricket team of the titular pin code (R.A. Puram, for you non-Chennai-ites), and the Royapuram Rockers â and what makes it so winning is that this is all there is to it. The cricket here isnât the vehicle for a metaphor, as in Lagaan or in Iqbal. This isnât about overcoming the British or overcoming a disability â this is just a small story about small people and their small triumphs.
And when I say âsmall people,â? I refer merely to their not being larger than life in any sense. One of them works as a waiter in a coffee shop, another is a mechanic â they are just a bunch of regular guys, with a bunch of regular names like Karthik and Arvind and Cheenu and Pazhani and Raghu and Ezhumalai (or â7 Malai,â? as his cricket vest puts it). And they are brought to beautiful life by a cast whose chief asset is its anonymity. No single performance stands out â if we remember Shiva, Nitin Satya, Jai and Premgi âyenna kodumai saar idhuâ? Amaran, itâs because they have the bigger roles, not because they are necessarily better than the others â and yet, all the performances seem just right. There is no suspension of disbelief required, because these actors are these people. (They are so… natural that when the elder brother I talked about earlier â the one with all that empathy â makes a few standard-issue villain noises, we immediately dismiss it as âacting.â?) These boys look like theyâve been chosen from a random sampling of students from Loyola College â no, make that Pachaiyappaâs College, for thereâs a strident streak of anti-Peterism in them. (One of the few moments that rings false is when our heroes crash a high-society party.) Theirs are the dreams of Bharathiraja love scenes and Ilayaraja background scores and jasmine flowers in their belovedâs hair â which is why itâs horrible when the film cuts away to glossy song sequences with metrosexual stylings, which are as out-of-place in the milieu of this movie as Thanni thotti was in the context of Sindhu Bhairavi.
The only other sore points are the attempts to manufacture drama â as if seeing these boys trying to run with their hopes and their dreams werenât dramatic enough. Chennai 600028 has been shot in colours that make it look like a Films Division documentary thatâs being projected for the 501st time, and this newsreel quality enhances the day-in-the-life texture of the narrative. Even the cricketing stretches arenât hyper-edited for impact â thereâs a bit of split-screen gimmickry, otherwise the games just roll by in the unremarkable (yet strangely comforting) rhythms of a match taking place at the Corporation playground near your home. And with all the low-key unfussiness of these goings-on, itâs jarring when you see the high-pitched nonsense involving local dadas and their stabbings (the long-ago motivations behind which youâve almost forgotten by the time these events occur). Toss this accusation at the filmmakers and theyâll probably justify these scenes â and those song sequences â as commercial compromises, but even otherwise, this is a pretty commercial movie. (We are, after all, talking about something that has made an instant â and indelible â contribution to popular culture, in the form of the catchphrase âSaroja saamaan nikaalo!â?) Still, these occurrences arenât allowed to fester, and thereâs lots more to focus on â like the brilliantly funny dialogue. (An English-illiterate remarks, upon hearing the name of the R.A. Puram team: âSharks… shoe podarathukku munnadi poduvangale, adhuvaa?â? And you havenât lived till youâve heard the cricket commentary. Sample bit of deadpan genius: âAvar pandhai pidikkavillai. Pandhu dhaan avarai pidithathu.â?) In any case, the real drama is in the stuff thatâs tucked away in the sidelines, as when a stranger walks into the playground, casually picks up a bat and calls out to a kid: âEy thambi, konjam bowling podu.â? This wonderfully offhand bit acquires a special poignancy when we recall all those conspiracy theories regarding national representation of players from our state â because it says that as long as thereâs street cricket, everyone can play.
ludwig
May 31, 2007
âSharks⦠shoe podarathukku munnadi poduvangale, adhuvaa?â?
âAvar pandhai pidikkavillai. Pandhu dhaan avarai pidithathu.â?
brilliant. this alone makes it a must-see.
LikeLike
Vamshi
May 31, 2007
Hi
In future, for non-Tamils’ sake can you please also give translation for the Tamil lines you have quoted. I wish in India movies from other languages were released wtih sub-titles. After all how much does it cost. Missed seeing Mozhi too that way. Guess i will have to wait for the DVDs
Vamshi
LikeLiked by 1 person
Zero
May 31, 2007
This is right up there for me. A brilliant film by any standards, and astoundingly so for a maiden film!
Be it the loads of throwaway bits of sheer brilliance and comedic genius, or the sublime mix of equal amounts of offhandedness and empathy towards what the characters are going through, this has to be seen to be believed!
LikeLike
Zero
May 31, 2007
By the way, there were loads of positive reviews alright, but most of them were too moderate, in my opinion, in their praise for the film, calling it “a good, fun and time-pass film, but no great shakes” or something to that effect. 🙂
LikeLike
bart
May 31, 2007
Yet to watch this movie. Balaji too has given a huge thumbs up to this cric-film. Will rush to the nearest theater.
Enjoyed your review as ever.
LikeLike
RS
May 31, 2007
you gave the same headline for iqbal
LikeLike
munimma
May 31, 2007
Watched it over the weekend. Loved it absolutely. It was so much about the boys and girls next door. The deadpan commentator was a killer, very subtle humor, could be easily missed. Loved the underlying humor that ran throughout the movie and the underplayed dramatics (rare in tamil movies). Of course, it did seem a little unpolished at certain times, a few more movies should help Venkat Prabhu.
The worst part of the movie was that northie actress trying to talk (move her lips) and emote at the same time. That scene where she catches him looking over the wall was probably the most terrible one in the movie.
Loved the way the movie ended.
LikeLike
sakthi
June 1, 2007
I liked the movie more for the way it ended. It is about ordinary events in the life of ordinary people and not making too much fuss or emotional noise about winning a game or matter of fact about anything. May be that is reason things like clash of dada, love portion of the coffee shop guy looks out of context and leaves a sense of dissatisfaction.
LikeLike
Preet
June 2, 2007
Hi,
How many times do you watch a movie before writing a review ? I am amazed by the level of detail your reviews reveal.
May be that is why you are a reviewer and I am a gushing reader 🙂
Thanks
Preet
LikeLike
brangan
June 3, 2007
ludwig: There’s lots more where those came from, so watch out 🙂
Vamshi: I’ll keep that in mind. Thanks.
Zero: But I thought I read a few gushy reviews – or maybe that was just yours 🙂
bart, preet: thanks.
munimma: “It was so much about the boys and girls next door.” That’s exactly why it’s so appealing. Oh, but let’s not even bring up the topic of lip movement and non-Tamil heroines – the bane of our cinema.
sakthi: Yes, the ending was genius, wasn’t it?
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 4, 2007
Baradwaj: I second vamshi!!! (although I realize it might add to your workload).
Vamshi: yeah I’m in the same boat – which is why I am psyched as last week Veyil and Rendu were released on subtitled DVDs, so will finally be getting to watch these soon…
For some reason Puthupettai remains the only major Tamil film from the last 4-5 years not released with English subtitles, and it’s incredibly frustrating…
LikeLike
brangan
June 4, 2007
Q – Rendu? (makes gagging noise) I know you’re a Maddy fan, but please don’t do this to yourself 🙂
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 4, 2007
Baradwaj: Listen bud, I enjoyed Thambi, so I don’t think Rendu is going to scare me off (what am I supposed to do if the most talented actor of his generation in either Hindi or Tamil gets not that many good roles unles Mani Rathnam is casting him?) 🙂
Though things seem to be looking up slightly in that Evano Oruvan (the Dombivli Fast remake) looks to be a classier product, although I didn’t much care for the Marathi original (and I find that sort of film politically very disturbing); then there’s the long delayed and probably stinky Aarya, but after that an RGV-produced film in Tamil and also UTV’s first Tamil production (guess those 9 minutes in RDB paid off!).
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 4, 2007
btw, nowadays I don’t see you on NG anymore 😦
…which only means your brilliant reviws are posted there by someone other than yourself…this one was characteristically superb, and the Fool n’ Final review was characteristically skewering (personally I would take the Thambi sort of film over the popcorn multiplex masala stuff any day)…
PS– if you’re interested t=check out my reviews of Anbe Sivam and Hey Ram on my blog…especially on the latter I wish I could read your review (do you have a link by any chance?)
LikeLike
brangan
June 4, 2007
Q: I’m not sure I’d call him “most talented actor of his generation in either Hindi or Tamil” – but I do enjoy watching him in urban-themed films. Somehow, he just doesn’t cut it for me as a ‘masala’ hero – except in the off case of Run. About NG, I know it’s been a long time. Should check out what’s happening there. Oh, and I’ve already bookmarked those two pieces. I’ll get back once I get around to reading them.
LikeLike
Vijay
June 4, 2007
I had fun just reading the one-liners here. Glad that you quoted some in your review. Now, I really need to catch it on DVD
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 4, 2007
Re: “Somehow, he just doesn’t cut it for me as a ‘masala’ hero – except in the off case of Run.”
I think mine is a minority view, but I think he can do masala — sure it’s a stretch to put him on Cheeyan Vikram or Vijay terrain, but even there his Thambi performance was pretty creditable. And Run was fantastic, but for me the true “test” is Aayitha Ezhuthu: he’s the only one of the younger actors in Hindi/Tamil who could have done any of the three roles. He was originally slated to play Siddharth’s role, and he obviously could have done that; when Vikram was unable to do Inba’s role he stepped in there, and while I too would rather see Cheeyan do that role than Maddy, he did a damn good job I thought (aside: was interesting to see how differently Abhishek and Maddy played these roles, darkly brooding and almost morally dead on the one hand, and an overgrown, psychotic kid on the other). And surely no-one can doubt his intensity in the Michael role after Kannathil Muthamittal or Guru (Surya was of course superb here, and really embarrasses Devgan’s laconic turn in the same part).
Anyway, this is off-topic rambling but I’ll stop now. Suffice it to say there’ll be a Rendu review on my blog when I get this DVD! 🙂
LikeLike
Shankar
June 6, 2007
I saw this movie over the weekend and was simply amazed. It does knock your socks off!! I thoroughly enjoyed the film. I feel that one would really appreciate the film if you have been part of the tennis ball cricket culture in Chennai or any other part of the country. For me, it brought back tons of memories of my own Studs XI vs Juggernauts battles back in college which incredibly had the same storyline as the film!! Juggernauts had all the mega stars and were always used to winning. We,on the other hand, were the team with no names yet we upset them in the semi-finals in a very tense game!! The clincher is that we lost the finals (I feel we got a bit too cocky!!)…this film’s ending just blew my mind on that one thing!!
LikeLike
Nina
June 7, 2007
This sounds like a fun movie. I’m gonna be in Madras this weekend – will try and watch it! Thanks for the review, Baradwaj Rangan. I used to live in R.A. Puram till a few years ago, so “Chennai 600028” has a special significance for me!!
LikeLike
Smrithi
June 14, 2007
i loved your review and i completely enjooyed the movie.. i think the high light of the movie, apart from its brilliant ending is the way the director has for once nothing to say, except show things as it is..
simple, refreshing and if nothing. makes you smile through most bits of the movie.
LikeLike
brangan
June 14, 2007
Vijay: See, I *can* be nice to Tamil films at time? 🙂
Qalandar: A Rendu review? can’t wait.
Shankar : “I feel that one would really appreciate the film if you have been part of the tennis ball cricket culture…” yes, but I think the film works even if you weren’t a part of the culture. Its themes of friendship and other things are pretty universal.
Nina: A 600028 girl cheering a 600028 film sounds about right to me 🙂
Smrithi: Thanks. Yes, the non-message aspect was a huge relief.
LikeLike
Sam
July 24, 2007
Someone actually said this already, but yeah, English translations or closest meanings of Tamil dialog might actually help us non Tamil speaking Tamil movie fans.
I catch Tamil films on DVD, and though the ones I have watched are fairly less, maybe your reviews might point me to good ones?
LikeLike
DPac
October 3, 2007
Just been initiated to your blog, rangan.
earlier posts were good. the fiction great.
then i get here…
i love tamil movies.. even when it is suttamaana tamizh and i don’t freaking understand anything..
but chennai …28, after a referral from a friend whose reccos i seldom ignore, failed to enthrall me.. even a wee bit..
i was left wondering why is everyone going ga ga over this average fair?
is it that bad a situation in tamizh filmdom that even a good film is catapulted to GREATness by everyone cuz it just is a bit better than average fair?
LikeLike
Qalandar
May 22, 2009
Finally saw Chennai 600028, this was the best of all the sports films I have seen recently (all but this one were B’wood). Part of the trick was definitely making this about a neighborhood down-home tournament, as opposed to the usual “I’m better than Bradman and will make it to the national side in a flash” fare. And its vibe and charm, and Chennai-feel, make it so much more than a sports flick– thanks for the warm review.
LikeLike