FOUR PLAY
A quartet of stars gets down to singing and dancing and loving in a wonderfully mad musical.
JUNE 17, 2007 – AFTER ENDURING, in successive weeks, the trashy incompetence of Fool N Final and The Train, it’s easy to forget that Bollywood is, in fact, going through a terrific phase, with a number of brave, new directors plunging headlong into a number of brave, new directions. And Shaad Ali, this week, reminds us of the fact. His first film was Saathiya, where he was so obsessed about being faithful to the original (Mani Ratnam’s Alaipaayuthey) that he forgot to make his own movie. Bunty Aur Babli, which came next, was much better. It was stylish and earthy and very much a piece with a voice — even if it didn’t quite hold up entirely. But neither of these films prepares you for Jhoom Barabar Jhoom, where Ali joins the ranks of Shirish Kunder and Farah Khan as a movie-mad crafter of meta-musicals. (Translation: if you didn’t care for Jaan-e-Mann, stay far away from this movie.)
The bold, brassy pitch that Ali maintained throughout Bunty Aur Babli is cranked up a couple of notches here, and it’s layered onto so many instances of self-referencing (and, yes, self-indulgence) that you’re no longer sure if you’re watching a film or winking at it or watching a film winking at itself. It isn’t just that Ali is unashamed of the whole song-and-dance routine; it’s that he positively revels in the glorious absurdities of the musical genre, as when a courtroom sequence with a lawyer arguing for the plaintiff suddenly morphs into the glitzy, high-octane Kiss of love number (sensationally choreographed by Vaibhavi Merchant, and brilliantly shot by Ayananka Bose). There’s no pretence about the song situation building from where the previous scene left off and tapering into where the next scene begins, nor is there an attempt to ground these song situations in a recognisable reality. What we’re seeing in these films is the Bollywood format taken to its most logical end: surrealism. It’s as if these filmmakers are taking their cues from Lolita, where Nabokov described the musical as a ‘grief-proof sphere of existence wherefrom death and truth were banned.’?
You can sense the joy that went into the making of Jhoom Barabar Jhoom right from the time the title makes its appearance, in spectrawide lettering surrounded by line drawings of sonic waves, as if the only purpose of the film lay in the space between the right speaker and the left one. This is a musical in the truest sense of the term. When I first heard Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy’s score, I wasn’t instantly hooked (though the songs stayed with me) — but the numbers fit beautifully into the overall design. The reason Ticket to Hollywood sounds so eccentric is that it’s sung by Rikki (Abhishek Bachchan) in front of the Eiffel Tower as he tries to retrieve a lottery ticket that could send him to the world’s movie capital. The situation itself is incredibly eccentric, said ticket having practically nothing to do with the rest of the film. It’s a little quirk blown up into a big production number for no apparent reason other than… well, why the hell not! Amitabh Bachchan plays some kind of pied piper of love haunting England’s train stations because… well, why the hell not! Alvira (Preity Zinta) has a flashback where she talks to the camera because… well, why the hell not! Jhoom Barabar Jhoom is so cheerfully — and so refreshingly — removed from reality that by the time we see Alvira sporting a butterfly tattoo on the left side of her chest, and a few scenes later it appears to have migrated to the right side, and in a song sequence later it’s transformed itself into a mole, we don’t file it away as a continuity glitch; we just think… well, why the hell not!
It takes some guts to fashion an entire movie about nothing in particular — what we’re more used to are movies that merely add up to nothing — and the reason Jhoom Barabar Jhoom works so spectacularly is possibly tucked away in a piece of lyric from Gulzar that’s (as is so typical of him) at once bizarre and just right: Yeh chand ka chikna sabun kuch der mein gal jayega, he writes, likening the moon (and therefore, the night) to a smooth bar of soap that’s going to dissolve very soon. The writing here has a similarly slippery quality. Just when you’ve thought you’ve gotten a grip on the kind of film this is going to be, it shape-shifts and surprises you and moves on — from French farce to a Before Sunrise-style talkathon to the Usual Suspects-type plot mechanics (unfortunately, the silliest and most redundant conceit of the screenplay) to the big, fat Bollywood musical.
The completely incidental story has something to do with the love-games between two couples — Rikki and Anaida (Lara Dutta), and Steve (Bobby Deol) and Alvira. (There are game performances from everyone, though the very sexy Lara and the very funny Bobby stand out simply because the movies we usually see them in are strictly Z-grade, where it’s hard to tell them apart from the furniture.) But the devil is in the details, which is exactly what Alvira tells Rikki when he accuses her of taking far too much time to outline her story. (The way she puts it, ‘Chhoti chhoti details mein bada lutf hota hai.’?) This film simply wouldn’t be what it is if it didn’t have the hilarious asides from Piyush Mishra, or the outlandishly detailed costumes by Aki Narula, or the annoying little sitar riff that sounds like the bit in the Seinfeld episode where Jerry and the gang visit India, or the delightful nods to a now-extinct moviemaking era (the targets include Qurbani, Sholay, Aradhana, Zamaane Ko Dikhana Hai and Coolie)… Even the offhand, off-screen action of a toilet being flushed adds a bit of colour to the mood of a moment.
And Shaad Ali stages these incidents with rhythms that are refreshingly different. With another director, the split-screen action of Alvira and Rikki branching off to receive Steve and Anaida respectively would have marked the interval point. (Alvira and Rikki are strangers who end up chatting at the train station because the train bringing in the people they are waiting for is late.) But here, we’re well into the second half when this happens, with the result that the first half feels somewhat incomplete. It’s left dangling, without that pat sense of mid-way closure — and the film is all the better for it. Jhoom Barabar Jhoom never really plays it safe. Even the mandatory love duet (the lovely Dhaage tod laao) is presented in a way that’s completely unexpected, though its one of the few instances of poignancy in a film that’s otherwise bracingly free of sentiment. Our love stories are usually’ (and perhaps rightly) emotional, glycerine-soaked affairs, but there are also times where love makes people do nutty things — and this charmingly nutty musical is an ode to that.
Copyright ‘©2007 The New Sunday Express
Badri
June 16, 2007
One word……..bizarre. Bobby was good, AB hammed. Music Rocks. Period. I thought I would settle for this one over Sivaji but Sivaji was way better!
LikeLike
brangan
June 16, 2007
Badri: Wow, an instant comment! Do you see every movie FDFS? 🙂
LikeLike
Abzee
June 16, 2007
Hey Baradwaj. Finally someone gets JBJ for what it is. I’ve never had this much fun at the cinemas since Bluffmaster, another film that was seeped in Bollywoodisms. The greatest triumph of JBJ is the fact that it doesn’t take itself seriously, knowing it for what it really is.
What did you think of the Nasir Hussain styled 25 minute dance-off? I loved that whole sequence.
LikeLike
Sujith
June 16, 2007
“The way she puts it, âChhoti chhoti details mein bada lutf hota hai.â?” me sentiments yes
Looking forward to your take on Sivaji
LikeLike
g
June 16, 2007
Hey where is your review of BOSS?
LikeLike
Anonymous
June 16, 2007
o yrr, i cannot believe rediff’s raja sen is pissed at the punjabi-ness…
this is great fun…very charming indeed.
LikeLike
Raj
June 16, 2007
Yours is the only review that gives a thumbs-up to this movie. And made me instantly change my intentions about watching the movie, especially since I loved Jaan-e-mann.
LikeLike
tansen
June 16, 2007
o, i thought it was fun, pretty pretentious reviews all round tho. i have decided i like shaad ali…his movies have this alternative, namkeen humor.
LikeLike
g
June 16, 2007
>It isn’t just that Ali is unashamed of the whole song-and-dance routine; it’s that he positively revels in the glorious absurdities of the musical genre, as when a courtroom sequence with a lawyer arguing for the plaintiff suddenly morphs into the glitzy, high-octane Kiss of love number (sensationally choreographed by Vaibhavi Merchant, and brilliantly shot by Ayananka Bose
You know you got weird tastes? I love Sajjid Khan’s wacky humor but similiar so called surrealism in his brother in law’s film that you praised so highly was just plain idiotic and no way innovative. I suspect the same is the case with all the song and dance you are doing about Jhoom Barabar. 🙂
P.S Talking about that movie, the one with Akshay as space geek and ending with that absolutely brainless blonde Priety in space)
LikeLike
brangan
June 16, 2007
Abzee: So glad you liked it too. Now there’s one more peson with “weird tastes”, according to g’s comment below 🙂 Oh, I loved that dance competition.It reminded me of the Rishi-Padmini piece in Zamane Ko… and also the Hum Kisi Se Kum Nahin medley.
Sujith: Will have the Sivaji review up soon. For some reason, the enthu ain’t happening 🙂
Raj: be warned though, I am known to have weird tastes…
tansen: Namkeen humour? That’s a great way to describe shaad’s films.
g: “You know you got weird tastes?” Oh absolutely.
LikeLike
Blogeswari
June 16, 2007
Where THE BOSS review i say?
LikeLike
brangan
June 16, 2007
Blogeswari: late-aa vandhaalum latest-aa varum… I hope 🙂
LikeLike
g
June 16, 2007
Even Farah Khan walks the fine line and sometimes becomes over-cute – eg the rickshaw chase scene in Main Hoon Na – I KNEW the audience will groan and so they did. 🙂
Otherwise apparently only she is capable of pulling off that kind of goofy fun. 🙂
LikeLike
filter kaapi
June 16, 2007
brangan u hv a fine taste of cinema..but u seem to just fall for musicals.
rumour has it that Jaaneman is nw used to treat POWs at Gautanmo Bay prison 😦
LikeLike
brangan
June 16, 2007
filter kaapi: That was very funny, I’ll give you that…
LikeLike
Vivek
June 16, 2007
So is it bearable?? (my only yardstick for bollywood movies)
watchd sivaji..twice 😀
review up on my blog
LikeLike
devashish makhija
June 16, 2007
JBJ makes audiences and filmmakers alike believe that ‘anything goes’. and that’s exactly what’s gravely wrong with the world at large today. it’s lazy, thought-free, indulgent, irresponsible, low on attention, garbled, loud, scream-till-your-fibres-burst stupidity. like the music cd itself requests on the sleeve – play this at the loudest possible volume. or you might just miss the goddamed point. if there is one at all. this coming from shaad’s erstwhile chief a.d. on ‘bunty aur babli’.
LikeLike
Peetre
June 16, 2007
Hi,
Why discuss movies in halves ? Screenplays are written with stories and characters in mind, not the endurance of the human bladder (**-makes a bow to Hitchcock -**).
I have long since given up expecting movies. I now look forward to only your reviews !
Peetre
LikeLike
brangan
June 16, 2007
devashish makhija : brangan, you certainly are a rare breed… the reviewer who accords credit for even the slightest of pluses in a cake so half baked the minuses stick between your teeth. being as i am in the thick of the film ‘manufacturing’ industry it seems to me the ‘craft’ (if it can even be called that anymore) is worming it’s way towards being firmly entrenched in the economics of supply and demand. ta ra rum pum is a prime example of a film that tosses in (self consciously and gratuitiously) every imaginable ingredient to elicit the emotion required of it by way of a money-spinning brief. it got cooked perhaps only once the ingredients were collected in the dish. and this is what, to my mind, separates most of the filmmakers of today from those of all the decades till the seventies (including yash chopra himself). they made a film because they had something to say. the new lot makes films because films make them money without them having to sit through corner office
teleconferences discussing sales graphs. unfortunate.
LikeLike
Aditya
June 16, 2007
Thanks for saving my face! When I came out of the theatre after watching this film, I realized that I was probably the only one in the entire theatre that loved the movie (the entire theatre resounded with loud claps at the interval, but that was in a sarcastic way). I told my wife after the show that every single film review would lambast JBJ, except Baddy who I would like it. I wasn’t wrong! At least there’s someone who shares my “weird” taste in films 🙂
Ever since I started following your reviews, the only time I did not agree with with you review was Salaam-e-ishq, although I agreed with most of what you said…just that on the whole the film didn’t work for me.
LikeLike
Aditya
June 17, 2007
And yes, the mysterious shifting of the tattoo is not a continuity glitch. I also thought the same till the camera moved a bit backwards and the frame of a mirror entered the frame – it was a mirror shot.
LikeLike
Pranav
June 17, 2007
Baradwaj, I must say that I differ in my views on this movie. I agree that this was a totally free-spirited movie completely unlike any other – except that during most parts, I found the movie totally cringeworthy and painful to sit through. Seriously, I would watch Gopi Kishen on endless loop over watching this a second time!!
LikeLike
Shahid
June 17, 2007
Phew, finally a guy who liked the movie as much as I did.
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie and I couldn’t for the life of me understand why it got such bad reviews. Being an Englander myself, I loved the way England was portrayed as a mini-Indian subcontinent with surprise cameos from such talented British actors like Meera Syal (as Bobby’s mom) and Sanjeev Kumar.
It was just fun fun fun all the way. It is a very sweet film. And three cheers to Lara Dutta who proves that she can shine in the right sort of movie (No Entry was the last time where I liked her so much).
The only downside was Amitabh Bachchan, he got on my nerves after a certain point. He should have stuck to the opening titles cameo but instead kept popping up again to annoy us.
LikeLike
Suderman
June 17, 2007
I couldn’t have disagreed with you more. And that happens very rarely.
Yes I was sleep-deprived all right but that didn’t stop me from guessing it was ‘Before sunrise’ meets ‘The Usual suspects’ within the first 15 minutes, as did my friend.
stealing ideas from two films (and executing it minus the energy of those films) does not make this fresh… unless you want to say stealing one idea is plagiarism, two ideas is research.
i LOVED jaaneman and main hoon na and i agree those films were wickedly, genuinely, insanely funny walking the line between tribute and spoof… this one’s a boring stageplay that tries to crossover to the musical side with hopes of making itself cinematically richer.
i did find half a dozen laughs in all and it’s a movie i wouldn’t mind watching on TV. but theatres… I wish I couldve caught up with sleep right there but that annoyingly loud song seemed to be on loop.
Having said that, yes, you do have a weird taste and im glad it was weird enough to like mine. 😀
LikeLike
Shahid
June 17, 2007
Oops that should be Sanjeev Bhaskar not Sanjeev Kumar, ha ha ha…
LikeLike
brangan
June 17, 2007
Vivek: “So is it bearable?” And more – but that’s just me.
devashish: I accidentally deleted your second comment, so I retreived it from my email and posted it again. I really don’t have a problem with anything-goes filmmaking if that’s what the film wants to be, which is quite different from a serious film backed by anything-goes execution. And I certainly wouldn’t call JBJ “thought-free”. A lot of thinking has gone into the aspects of production and writing. And I wouldn’t put Ta Ra Rum Pum and JBJ in the same basket at all. The former had an idea but didn’t have the conviction to go with it all the way. This one has.
Peetre: “Why discuss movies in halves ?” Because that’s an important consideration in our cinema: where to break the film so that the first half ends on a high note and keeps the audience intriguede about the second.
Aditya: You’re most welcome 🙂 But surely there are other mainstream critics who’ve liked it! And dammit, weird is good. At least, it makes for interesting discussions 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
June 17, 2007
Aditya: Oh, a mirror shot, eh? I missed that, but my point was that it didn’t matter in the context of this movie.
Pranav: Gopi Kishen, as in the dancer? Poor man, what did he do to earn your wrath? 🙂
Shahid: Oh good. The I-loved-JBJ crowd is slowly building 🙂 AB Sr. actually didn’t bother me so much. And I loved the touch where he pops up in the dance competition.
Suderman: Somehow methinks your lack of sleep thanks to Thalaivar affacted your perception of JBJ 🙂 But this isn’t about Usual Suspects at all; just that one bit doesn’t make this a ripoff. Also, the Before Sunrise format has been tweaked with enough to make this its own movie, with surreal flashbacks and all. So yes, they may have been inspired, but that’s certainly not plagiarism.
LikeLike
J
June 18, 2007
There is a thin fine line straddling between eccentricity based on non-chalance and plain idiocy. IMHO, Jaan-e-mann got it bang on and I loved it – JBJ got it horribly wrong. Period. It has to be the worst YashRaj movie I have seen in the last 4 yrs and U mustn’t forget that we are talkin of competition from the likes of TaRaRumPum, Salaam Namste and Mere yaar ki shaadi (I cant remember the other horrors)…It was stupid, mind numbing and was an assault on my senses.
The first half was “excruciating” and if it weren’t for some damage limitation (too little too late??) in the second half, I would have been so tempted to rip my seat to shreds in frustration…after all “well, why the hell not”
However it wasn’t all bad and the saving grace as you clearly mentioned – choreography and the thumping musical score. And that one delightful line where Rikki talks about the wax statues of Amitabh and Aishwarya in Tussaud’s and remarks that one day he will have his too 😉
ps: Dude, you have ruint me !! When my wife told me the tattoo had moved from the left to the right, I bet her good money that Shaadi Ali wasn’t that bad. Now you’ve confirmed my worst fears !!
LikeLike
Gaurav
June 18, 2007
I saw Jhoom Barabar Jhoom yesterday and its gotta be one of the worst movies made. No amount of music and repetitive music at that and overflowing bling can hide the lack of a story line and passe jokes.
Bobby Deol was so-so, Lara Dutta and Preity didnt leave much of an impression and Abhi hammed. Bits and pieces of the second half are funny, but most of the exchange between between Abhi and Priety at the train station in the first half is downright painful.
Sometimes I wonder that when these actors are making the movie, or even when the script is being written does no one stop to think how pathetic the movie is turning out to be? JBJ style movies take the audience to be dumb fools or accelerates the dumbing down of people.
Sheesh!!
LikeLike
Anonymous
June 19, 2007
Really,it is a very good film.
LikeLike
Akshay Shah
June 20, 2007
FANTASTIC review as always Baradwajbhai:-)!!! Just outstanding…..so many people are missing the point of JBJ imo……Ali rocks!
My review below:-) if you haven’t read it
http://aakshayshah.blogspot.com/2007/06/akshay-shah-watches-jhoom-barabar-jhoom.html
A.Shah
LikeLike
Lakshmi
June 20, 2007
I watched Jaan-E-Mann on your reco solely and I really liked it… 🙂 I think I’ll check out JBJ next! Thanks for the awesome writing, B.
LikeLike
Prash
June 20, 2007
I share your views & have mentioned so on my blog too.
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 21, 2007
Aditya: you and Baradwaj and Akshay Shah are not alone mere bhai!! Loved JBJ too…
http://qalandari.blogspot.com/2007/06/jhoom-barabar-jhoom-hindi-2007.html
And am reminded of the line from The Jungle Book:
“What the bandar log think now
The jungle will think later!”
🙂
LikeLike
Beth
June 22, 2007
“Why the hell not” gets me through a lot of Bollywood movies – and in all seriousness it makes dealing with life a little easier. Call it a filmified version of “don’t sweat the small stuff.” If Amitabh wants to pop up in my neighborhood and play something on his double-necked guitar, all the while looking like something George Clinton left in the closet, then I’m all for it.
LikeLike
brangan
June 22, 2007
J: Always listen to your wife, dude 🙂 But about the tattoo move, check out Aditya’s point above.
Gaurav: Reg. “lack of a story line…”, I don’t know that they were going for an incident-crammed narrative even when they started out.
Anonymous: Really, it is indeed 🙂
Akshay Shah: Thanks. Caught your review too. Good stuff.
Lakshmi: Do let me know if one worked for you as well.
Prash: Thanks.
Qalandar: Ah, another fan. Good, good…
Beth: That’s an interesting way of looking at Indian cinema. Though I’m not always a fan of “why the hell not”, here it worked because the film was going for that feel.
LikeLike
Ravi
June 23, 2007
I caught the movie a week after the release, solely cos of ur review. Hated the first half, but the second half more than made up for it. My two cents up at my blog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
June 23, 2007
Ravi – read your two cents. am glad you liked it overall. but you seem to have enjoyed certain parts of the first half, so why do you say you “hated” it? 🙂
LikeLike
Ravi
June 24, 2007
Only the songs Rangan, only the songs…it was otherwise pretty drab!
LikeLike
Vivek Gupta
June 25, 2007
Hi Rangan,
I just caught the movie on Video and loved all of it. Great stuff indeed and Lara Dutta was a revealation (in more ways than one). Too bad that the audience and critics did not get it.
LikeLike
brangan
June 25, 2007
Vivek Gupta: Nice. So is there actually a JBJ cult in the making? 🙂
LikeLike
Pawan
June 26, 2007
Loved the movie. Going to watch it again.
Am initiated into to the cult.
LikeLike
Pawan
June 26, 2007
A couple of points-
The dream song shot in Delhi by two lovers sitting in a phoren country is an inversion of bollywood cliche of two lover sitting in India singing a dream song in phoren locations.
Also, I really liked the fact that characters spoke in the language that they would. Quite impressed by the fact that there were large chunks of dialogs in french, a language that maybe five hundred people in India understand.
LikeLike
An Ideal Boy
June 26, 2007
Hey Rangan!!
I was very happy after watching this movie. Your review sums up my feeling 🙂
It is a movie which you will either love or hate.
LikeLike
Rishi
June 26, 2007
Thank God!
I thought I was the only one who enjoyed this movie for what it was. Every single reviewer out there starts shouting “bakwaas! Nothing happens in the movie!”
Thank you for not being overly pretentious in your reviews and having the ability to enjoy a film for what it is.
LikeLike
Qalandar
June 27, 2007
Pawan: that is an astute point; sadly most of the reviewers have focused on how “incongruous” that sequence is in the film — I completely disagree, and indeed along with Kajra Re the Indian sequence of JBJ might be Shaad Ali’s best piece of filmmaking.
Sadly, there have long been strong rumors that as originally envisioned the film was to be set in India as BnB was, but that pressure from YRF led to the “switch” to London…
LikeLike
Vishu
June 29, 2007
Thanks to Qalandar for pointing me out to your blog. I am so relieved to see that theer are so many people like me who actually appreciated the whole idea behind JBJ. I am gonna read your other reviews and blog. Seems pretty darn interesting.
By the way the whole of Preity talking with camera os something that is often shown in most of the french comedy movies. This is something very common there.
LikeLike
dipali
June 30, 2007
Just home after seeing the film, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Looking forward to Shaad Ali’s next film. Couldn’t understand what people found wrong with it- I guess it takes all kinds!
LikeLike
Sonu
July 2, 2007
JBJ rocks!! Its hillarious, with delightful visuals. It just teased its way through… rather unpredictable. Probably, that is the reason, it didn’t get along well with the majority of audience. Although it could have definitely done without monotonuos glimpses of Amitabh Bachchan, every now and then. Baby AB and Lara Dutta were cool.
LikeLike
Lalita
August 6, 2007
Saw JBJ !
I thougt it was funny but nothing exceptional.
What i like about Shahaad Ali is that he cares about those “petites gens ” (in french). All these people in small towns with big dreams. Thatâs what makes his movies more real actually. They reflect our aspirations for happiness, money, glory and fame in a society where u don’t dream to be a lawyer or a doctor anymore. Thatâs why the main characters of these movies never have any problem to go against the law, or to lie… Even if our heroes here are NRI who dream about meet each other in India, being married in front of the Taj Mahal and so on⦠Shahid Ali is still talking about a Bunty and a Bably.
I liked the movie but i understand why some people didn’t like it.
I read somewhere that it was a movie for geeks… perhaps. I didn’t get all the references, except Sholay (Jaan-e-mann perhaps). Does it mean that i missed all the director intentions. Nope. JBJ is a big good joke that just needed to be shorter. It lacks rhythm, the pace drops at times, too much music in the second part of the movie.
When u do a movie like this (âa laâ? Harry Meets Sally â is that the good title in English ?) u need some good twist to keep the viewers attention. And it wasnât always the case here. Perhaps people needed more fun, masala etc⦠who knows ?
But just donât say that none of them didnât get Aliâs point.
(sorry for my bad English⦠salut !)
LikeLike
Saleheen
December 11, 2007
I loved the movie – for a film with sooo many bollywood references, the feel of the film is European rom-com on Bhaang! the film was definitely not masala in the typical bollywood blockbuster sense, and yes, getting the in-jokes makes it muuuch more enjoyable. A salute to yashraj for spending so much money on a niche film – coz that’s what this actually is – not even arthouse, which everyone who goes to see would sycophantically pretend to love, but plain niche … a big budget musical for a really small audience.
ps – dontcha just love lara and the delicious way she lip-synchs to “Non non monsieur” in that Hollywood song? Also, did anyone notice that this is probably the first time Bollywood actors playing British Indians actually bothered to sound British?
LikeLike
hans
April 13, 2010
Interesting that you support such a bland movie with some of the worst hamming i’ve seen. And it wasn’t self-ironical here. Silly musicals like Om Shanti Om are good fluffy fun, but JBJ is nothing like that; it’s nothing at all.
LikeLike