THE WIZARD OF AWES
JK Rowling gives her deservedly celebrated series a rousing – and very satisfying – sendoff.
JULY 23, 2007 – IT IS OMINOUS, but perhaps not entirely unsurprising, that JK Rowling prefaces Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows with a couple of quotes about death (one of them from Aeschylus – “… the stroke that hits the vein, the haemorrhage none can staunch” – that makes you wonder if the wily old Greek actually knew a thing or two about the aftereffects of the Sectumsempra spell). Ever since Professor Trelawney glimpsed the Grim around Harry Potter in Harry Potter and the Prisoner and Azkaban, death has stalked our young hero – and those around our young hero – in increasingly unanticipated ways, and if there’s one question on everyone’s lips before opening this most awaited of adventures (other than, of course, Am I going to be able to resist the temptation of flicking to the last page?), it’s this: Does Harry Potter survive his inevitable wand-off with Lord Voldemort?
But a more pressing question would be this one: Does Harry Potter have what it takes to survive his inevitable wand-off with Lord Voldemort? After all, he’s merely seventeen a few chapters into Deathly Hallows, and he’s barely had six years of magical school education, while his nemesis is not only much older but also with far more – now, how shall we put this politely? – real-life experience. No less a wizard than Professor Dumbledore himself appears in awe of the Dark Lord, for he confides to Harry during his customary post-climactic-battle chat in the Headmaster’s office, in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, “I knew that Voldemort’s knowledge of magic is perhaps more extensive than any wizard alive. I knew that even my most complex and powerful protective spells and charms were unlikely to be invincible if he ever returned to full power.”
Professor Snape minced far fewer words in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince when he spat out, “[Harry] has fought his way out of a number of tight corners by a simple combination of sheer luck and more talented friends,” and Voldemort himself sneers, in Deathly Hallows, “That Potter lives is due more to my errors, than to his triumphs” – and our overriding concern for Harry, as we plunge feverishly into his seventh and last adventure, is our sinking feeling that Snape and Voldemort are right. Even with Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger beside him, however is he going to acquire, in such a short time, the knowledge and the skills to complete the task that Dumbledore has set for him, which is to first unearth the remaining Horcruxes – those magical objects that house splintered parts of Voldemort’s soul, and which need to be destroyed if Voldemort is to be destroyed – and finally go mano-a-mano (rather, boyo-a-mano) with the greatest Bad Wizard of all time?
It’s to Rowling’s credit that, for a significant part of Deathly Hallows, she does absolutely nothing to alleviate our apprehensions. (It’s surely no coincidence that the very first time we meet Harry, we find him at his most vulnerable: “Harry was bleeding.”) Harry, Ron and Hermione appear, more than ever, three silly kids in over their heads – bumbling across the countryside, stumbling into the right people, lucking into crucial magical objects, chancing upon important information at just the right moment. But the magic – and yes, this is sheer magic – of Rowling’s narrative design is that her story could exist, could function no other way. It’s just right – and by the end of it all, by the time we absorb the inevitability of the final revelations, even sceptics may find themselves staving off a fighting urge to slap their foreheads hard and cry out, “But of course!”
While the verdict is still out on Rowling’s literary gifts – rather, the apparent lack of them – no one who’s followed the series can fault her facility for spinning one heck of an involving yarn, and Deathly Hallows proves, yet again, that this author is nothing if not an expert puppeteer of audience emotions. Slowly, surely, she manipulates us – interspersing fond remembrances of what we already know with teasing snatches of what we are dying to know. Saying farewell to his home on Privet Drive, early on, Harry pulls open a door under the stairs. “And under here, Hedwig,” he exclaims to his snow-white owl, “is where I used to sleep! You never knew me then – blimey, it’s small, I’d forgotten…” We haven’t – but that’s hardly the point. We know what our loved ones looked like ten years ago, but that doesn’t prevent us from pulling out albums of old photographs from time to time, and that’s the effect that Rowling creates here. Harry’s nostalgia – along with the reappearances of everyone and everything, from Sirius Black’s motorcycle to the snitch that Harry apprehended in his very first Quidditch match – is a sentimental reminder of a magical world that we’ve known for a decade, that we’re now saying goodbye to forever.
What’s new in Deathly Hallows, however, is that this is the first time it’s all-out war – and while the rousing arc about a small group of rebels fighting to bring down an unstoppably evil regime isn’t exactly new to pop-culture storytelling (think Star Wars or Terminator 2), Rowling hints at real-world underpinnings. It’s impossible not to think of Anne Frank when Harry and his friends are holed up in a desolate house to escape the stalking Death Eaters, just as Voldemort’s pure-blood obsession harks back to Hitler – and these parallels bring about some inevitable dissonances in a book written with children in mind. When Hermione runs over her checklist before launching into a particularly dangerous offensive, we note, with some alarm, that her ammunition consists of the Invisibility Cloak, Polyjuice Potion, Decoy Detonators, Puking Pastilles, Nosebleed Nougats and Extendable Ears (although, later, Rowling does acknowledge these preparations as “laughably childish”). Another factor that eats considerably into the element of danger is that practically every move of Voldemort’s is sensed comfortably ahead-of-time by Harry, thanks to his psychically-connected scar.
That’s not to say Deathly Hallows is anything less than a nail-biting read. A rescue operation inside the Ministry of Magic is thrillingly written, and the climactic battle is a real rouser, what with the magical creatures of the world uniting against a common enemy the way they did in another fictional universe, many decades ago, when another fantasist wrote about a quest to destroy a near-indestructible magical object. (Harry’s mission to eliminate the Horcruxes parallels Frodo’s journey in other respects too, particularly in the revelation that a Horcrux has the power to cloud the possessor’s mind.) Along the way, there are nods to the Arthurian legends (a sword is retrieved from a lake), Gothic romances like Jane Eyre (an embarrassment to the family is locked up inside her own home), and perhaps even our own Ramayana (a magical deer that may be trap for three people living in a forest, go figure!) – but then, Rowling has always been an equal-opportunity appropriator.
And these appropriations, in Deathly Hallows, come together as well as you could wish for. Rowling may leave you dissatisfied with the surprisingly slapdash way her villain goes about his nefarious business, and she may leave you quibbling over her seemingly inexhaustible stock of narrative coincidences, but you brush aside these concerns because you care about the characters. You care for Harry when he gets hold of a letter written by his mother, and you care that she made her g’s the same way he does. (“He searched through the letter for every one of them, and each felt like a friendly little wave glimpsed from behind a veil.”) These relationships – between friends (Harry and Ron and Hermione), between whether-or-not boyfriends and girlfriends (Harry and Ginny, Ron and Hermione), between parent and child (Lily Potter and Harry, Molly Weasley and her brood, Narcissa Malfoy and Draco, Xenophilius Lovegood and Luna, the Grangers and Hermione) – are the reason we buy, yet again, one last time, into Rowling’s writing. Spells, enchantments, jinxes and curses all have their place, but as the wise Dumbledore once put it, the greatest and most powerful magic is love.
Copyright ©2007 The New Indian Express
Pedro Morgado
July 22, 2007
Please, don’t let J. K. Rowling kill Harry Potter. 🙂
LikeLike
Deepa
July 22, 2007
Loved the long meandering road towards the end. Don’t you think “en thangatchi madhirida” sounds less ridiculous in Tamil compared to English:)
LikeLike
Ravi
July 23, 2007
Detail is what Rowling thrives upon and u have captured the same in ur review! A very very satisfying read indeed. I have quoted u in my piece about the book. Loved ur ‘Deconstructing Harry’ too!!!
LikeLike
sid
July 23, 2007
I thought it was pretty great. Azkaban and Goblet remain my favorites but this was probably third best.
The epilogue was kinda lame though.
LikeLike
Aparna
July 23, 2007
Even I got reminded of Ramayana when I read that magical deer part! 🙂
I felt the epilogue was unnecessarily too long. And I was not able to imagine Harry living a peaceful life for 19 long years when his childhood had been such an action-packed one!
LikeLike
monisha
July 23, 2007
says a lot about the book by the number of people who have managed to finish the book within the weekend…. though the end is very bollywoodish, including the old format of gathering all stat cast in the end for a happy version of title song.
LikeLike
selva
July 23, 2007
Not a potter fan. don’t like the series and don’t know why.
[dig] Anyway, Baradwaj – Have u seen Kireedom? Good film. Loved Rajkiran and he was awesome. Expecting your review on that. [/dig]
LikeLike
brangan
July 23, 2007
Pedro: What, you haven’t found out yet?
Deepa: Can I tell you I’ll never be able to think of Harry and Hermione again without your dialogue flashing across my head? 🙂
Ravi: Thanks man. Where have you quote me BTW?
sid: I too wasn’t a fan of the epilogue. But quibbles and all, it was a pretty good read.
Aparna: “Even I got reminded of Ramayana when I read that magical deer part!” Ah, great minds and all that… 🙂
monisha: is there anyone who’s actually liked the epilogue? I’m curious now…
selva: Kireedom on my to-do list. Will hopefully manage it soon.
LikeLike
brangan
July 23, 2007
Ravi: Read it on your blog post… Thanks.
LikeLike
munimma
July 23, 2007
Great review! The book filled a lot of gaps. It was a good story. Loved the action scenes. Liked how Neville had evolved. I thought we would learn more about the Potters. Kreacher’s redemption was well etched. Epilogue was of course not satisfactory. I am looking forward to her clarifications, which I am sure, will follow.
LikeLike
Ravi
July 23, 2007
I did like the epilogue, almost seemed like an after thought, but it was good nevertheless…fancy hearing a name like Albus Severus!!!
LikeLike
galadriel
July 23, 2007
i didn’t care much for the epilogue either.. jkr could have atleast told us what careers they finally ended up with (barring longbottom, of course).. and i found it very hard to imagine harry/ron all grown up and with teenaged kids to boot.. 🙂
LikeLike
Abrum
July 23, 2007
Random thoughts:
*SPOILERS AHEAD*
1. Thought the Snape-Lily bit was too cute. Ended up feeling sorry for the chap.
2. So all Kreacher needed was a few kind words and a locket for him to take half-bloods and mudbloods to his bosom, eh? :))
3. Why does Percy come back so much later? I mean, even after Order of the Phoenix, he (and the Ministry) knew that V was back. Didn’t he feel any remorse then? Seems like he came back only ‘cos Fred was about to pop off and she wanted the rest of the family to re-unite. Percy could’ve popped off instead; such a moron he has been all along.
4. They pretty much bungled through it all. Extraordinary amount of luck came their way…just when they needed it. Ron finds he can hear them through the put-outer (deluminator ?)…just when he needs to get back. Harry is able to read V’s thoughts …just when he needs some clue to the Horcrux. I know…I know….we need to give allowances for a fantasy tale….but too much 🙂 I wonder if Harry would’ve been able to defeat V (just with the love that runs through his veins and the bravery in his heart) if he didn’t have so many things going his way. He doesn’t seem to know many spells (Hermy does whatever needs to be done; reads up whatever they need to know; thank Heavens they have her around) and somehow V always arrives “seconds” after Harry leaves the spot. Mighty convenient, methinks!
5. V, being the almighty wizard that he is, could not figure out that Harry was alive just a few feet away from him? He couldn’t feel…couldn’t hear Narcissa whisper to him and him whispering back…I mean, is he a superb Legilimens or not?
6. And what’s with 8 Horcruxes instead of 7? Earlier, Dumbledore said that there would be 7 in all (with one residing within V) and so they had to hunt for 6, of which they knew the locket, ring, diary and Nagini were 4 and they had to find 2 more that probably belonged to the founders. So they find the diadem and cup. That makes it 6 which was supposed to be everything. Then, we find Harry has a piece in him too that he was supposed to destroy and thus…u-know-what. So that makes it 8 horcruxes in all, while 7 is the magical number. Vat man!!
7. And…”Accio Hagrid”????? :)) Too funny! Can just imagine Hagrid hurtling up throught the air crashing into Harry and throwing him off the bike 😀
8. Thought it was sweet how, in the end, no one sat at their house tables and were all jumbled together; finally united against a common cause.
9. She left the epilogue kind of open ended….”The scar has not pained Harry for nineteen years”….why would it? Isn’t Voldermort u-know-what? Seems kind of unnecessary to have said that.
10. Also, what about Harry’s Auror aspirations? What happens to all of them and what do they become? If she did want to brief us on what happened 19 yrs later, I’d rather she spoke about whether they realized their dreams than what they named their kids. That bit was totally confusing…Albus, James, Lily….I had to read and re-read to figure out which kid was which. Same names were really very confusing, even though, yeah they were named for senti reasons.
11. And poor poor Fred, he really deserved more than a passing mention of how his body was hidden before they went to fight again. He and George were such lively, darling fellows, that I can’t even imagine George running Weasley’s Wizarding Wheezes without him. What happens to George then? Does he do a solo act or is he heartbroken and goes into seclusion?
12. After faithfully following Harry and co’s exploits over the years, I wish she had expanded on their life after Voldermort’s u-know-what than their kid’s names and their upcoming animosity towards Scorpius….poor chap…what a name 🙂 Guess, Draco’s no better!
For all this, am kinda really sad this was the last book. Even despite a lot of unanswered questions, the book was brilliant (her imagination is totally mind-boggling) and I had to really exert a lot of willpower to not turn to the end. So, only the last two movies left now, which are nice in itself, but I have yet to see a HP movie that satisfied me as much as the books did. The Goblet of Fire movie was too much..they simply chopped off the entire World Cup and that was the cutest part of the book! Now that they are inaugurating a Harry Potter Theme park in Florida in 2009 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6706939.stm), that is something to look forward to. 😀
LikeLike
Abrum
July 23, 2007
Another thing is that…to me…V seemed more of a menace, and more frightening (so much so that they are afraid to mention his name) in the past (before he vanished into oblivion thanks to Harry) than he ever does in the present. The V that appears in various forms and finally with red slits and a very pale, almost inhuman face, seems to be some one that, despite the death eater support system, can be easily thwarted by a bunch of kids. And he does seem to commit error after error giving Harry the upper hand, despite being the most feared one. One would think he would learn that he had to employ Occulmency so that Harry doesn’t gain access to his thoughts, but he neither realizes that Harry has seen, nor does he seem to do much about it once he does know.
Dwelling on the nicer aspects of the book, I thought, Harry digging a grave for Dobby, without using magic, was really sweet. I guess this is the kind of thing that is endearing about Harry Potter…
Another really likeable thing abut the HP series is that she intersperses serious stuff with humor like Fred calling George his holeyness”. It’s a testament to how involved we were in the books that we almost felt we lost someone close to us when Fred died. I can’t think of any other book that has made me feel this way in recent times. Nor have i stayed up all night finishing a book just ‘cos I need to know what’s going to happen. With us feeling so strongly about HP, what must she feel now that it’s ended (?).
LikeLike
rs
July 24, 2007
it is to your credit that you have managed a good review without any spoilers. i want to get a glimpse but want to read everything that is of consequence in the book itself.
thanks
LikeLike
brangan
July 26, 2007
munimma: Thanks – and yes, a book of clarifications would be most welcome 🙂
galadriel: yes, did harry become an auror or now, dammit!
Abrum: Exhaustive list of contentions. Phew!
rs: Thanks. And what did YOU think?
LikeLike
rs
July 27, 2007
Am yet to start reading 🙂
LikeLike
Ramu
July 27, 2007
I have visited Your site Which is about the Harry Potter its very nice to read that information about the Harry potter books. Its very nice site about Harry Potter . Newly I have visited one website which is related to your website which says about the Harry Potter Book reviews . For Complete Details about this site by clicking this harry potter book review
LikeLike
Vidhya
August 7, 2007
My 2 cents. (I hereby notify that this longgg comment is no indication of how jobless i am right now)
SPOILER WARNING –
1. JKR said trace is on harry till 17 for magic, yet when Dobby performed magic at dursley’s harry was reprimanded.
2. Abrum – Horcruxes are still 7. The one inside V has gone to reside inside potter…Am i right?
3. Mad Eye moody’s body was not found – how did the eye end up with that silly umbridge? (I love moody…why did moody have to go? Why not dung?)
4. Accio hagrid – That was a big blooper. The Accio charm is supposed to work only on objects. Isnt it? When did it start working on half giants?
5. I personally thought JKR was overdoing the love part with Harry fantasising about Ginny at every possible free moment. Loser/mike Murali madri aakitangapa Harrya 😦
6. Deepa – Totally agree with you. I almost gagged when i read the line about the sister thingy. Here i thought only chennai girls are expert in the “naan ungalai annan madri ninaichen” dialogue – I wasnt prepared for the other way round dialogue from Harry.
7. Ramayana and the Doe thing – Interesting observation. I always thought that JKR was a master porukki(picker). She picks amazing information from mythology/folklore across the world and puts it all together for one spicy potluck.
Eg:
Horcrux/nagini – Indian mythology/folklore
Basilisk – Irish tales
Fluffy/Pixies/Grindylows and most other creatures – Greek mythology
8. Why did she have to leave Krum without a girlfriend? Thats so sad. No Hermy/No Ginny…well..I think i just might shift to Siberia 😉
9. Why did RAB choose to drink the potion himself and die when he had kreacher? Why suicidal? Kreacher’s story was a surprise turning point.
10. Hogwarts battle – Why on earth did Voldy not apparate and had to fly from whereever he was to Hogwarts? I mean – he can apparate outside the grounds of course – Why such a dramatic entry just cos he can fly?
11. Why Why Kill Fred? The humour with fred and george was so beautiful in all the books…they have never failed to make me laugh. It was not the wry brit humour..it was a full blown in your face wonderful humour. U NO POO 🙂 Dobby, Tonks, Lupin, Creevey – most of my fav characters gone.
12. Whats with the Epilogue? Anyways…theres already too much said about it.
13. The best part was Snape’s story. I always loved Snape…but this was soooo cute.
14. Loved the part where Harry uses the Cruciatus on Carrow brothers and remarks about the need to use it. (Makes me think i shd be in slytherin)
Oh well…Why nitpick? I love the world she has created for us. The last book was a fitting finale. Nalla South indian full meals sapta madri…lots of mushy love, anger, fights between friends, Sentimental reunions, deaths, tears, mother sentiment, tangachi sentiment, thali sorry molly sentiment, Hogwarts battle, Villain death.
Take a bow Ms.Rowling. You have given us ten glorious years.
LikeLike
rs
August 14, 2007
as far as the series goes, JKR has rounded it off pretty decently but as an individual book i wasn’t as impressed as i was with the previous two.
and, there is something about wanting a closure but hammering the closure down the reader’s throat is quite another. still, i’m not quite upto being harsh about HP.
LikeLike
jasmine sinsinwar
October 29, 2009
ohhhhhhhhhh my god i haven’t in my whole life read such a booooooook n such a reader like j k rowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i am the biggest fan of her n her books.
when i read them its like i am n the story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Bellaisme1234
June 10, 2010
I m a good enough fan of JK Rowling she has done a great job OMG OMG OMG LOVE THE BOOK…. but not more than Twilight and series
LikeLike
Voldemort
September 17, 2018
Stumbled across this review while going through the archives, and, it’s the best review of the series I’ve ever read. It’s more like a review of the entire series, than for the final book.
Along the way, there are nods to the Arthurian legends (a sword is retrieved from a lake), Gothic romances like Jane Eyre (an embarrassment to the family is locked up inside her own home), and perhaps even our own Ramayana (a magical deer that may be trap for three people living in a forest
What a brilliant take!
Spells, enchantments, jinxes and curses all have their place, but as the wise Dumbledore once put it, the greatest and most powerful magic is love
BR, you know this definitely, you have a really amazing style of writing. It’s such a joy to read your words. You should write fiction, I’m sure it will be one of the best books in recent times.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Purple Sky
September 17, 2018
Thank you Voldemort, for commenting here. Else, I would not have come across this gem. A “good” morning read.
LikeLike
rsylviana
September 17, 2018
@Voldemort – Thanks for commenting now and making me find this gem after all these years .
You care for Harry when he gets hold of a letter written by his mother, and you care that she made her g’s the same way he does. (“He searched through the letter for every one of them, and each felt like a friendly little wave glimpsed from behind a veil.”) *
I remember this part distinctly . I actually cried when I came to this part as it comes after Harry has been feeling a bit left out after travelling with his best friends whom, he can see very clearly now, are interested in each other. Rowling sure knew how to make her readers bawl their eyes out .
LikeLiked by 1 person
tonks
September 17, 2018
I never thought I’d meet he who must not be named in this blog.
I half thought I’d change my name from Tonks to Osha in honour of GOT but the way the seasons are progressing I’m glad I did not.
The deer in a forest similarity to Ramayana did not strike me when I read the books but what did is this :
Kamsa hearing a prophecy and wanting to kill Krishna and trying numerous ways to do so but failing
1) Kaliya = Nagini = chamber of secrets
2) Poothana = Dolores Umbridge = order of the phoenix
and so on till the finale
LikeLike
Voldemort
September 18, 2018
Thank you Voldemort, for commenting here. Else, I would not have come across this gem. A “good” morning read
I have been going through a lot of the older reviews this week, I am a new reader of this blog, so I go through the archives and see what is his take on older movies or Google the review (it’s kinda difficult digging up older posts) and I resisted commenting on them because it’s like too late. But this one was just so nice that I couldn’t not comment.
never thought I’d meet he who must not be named in this blog
Ha! Do not underestimate the power of the Dark Lord is all I say.
Kamsa hearing a prophecy and wanting to kill Krishna and trying numerous ways to do so but failing
1) Kaliya = Nagini = chamber of secrets
2) Poothana = Dolores Umbridge = order of the phoenix
and so on till the finale
But Umbrige wasn’t a death eater, whereas Poothana was sent by Kamsa. But Quirrell? He would be apt probably, acting like a good guy in the beginning and all.
Kaliya would be the basilisk as that’s what tries to kill Harry in the Chamber of secrets. But Nagini tries to kill Harry too, in the Deathly Hallows.. Like BR said, Rowling has always been an equal opportunity appropriator. There are a lot of elements from several mythologies, but the way she weaves them all together, that finesse is what makes it such an engaging read.
LikeLike