THAI STORY
Bombay boy falls for Bangkok girl in an underwhelming outing from Nagesh Kukunoor.
JAN 20, 2008 – HERE’S WHAT I THINK HAPPENED WITH NAGESH KUKUNOOR as he sat down to write his latest movie. After the creative crests of Iqbal and Dor, he must have reckoned that a law-of-averages trough was just around the corner – so rather than expend time and energy on an ambitious project that was bound to misfire anyway, why not simply sit this one out with a trifle hardly worth his time or ours. He may have also decided, along the way, to pay homage to the screwball sprit of Preston Sturges, who never met a nutty character he didn’t like or an out-there situation that he couldn’t shoehorn into his screenplays. And so we have ourselves the high-concept low achievement that is Bombay to Bangkok.
This title is indicative of where the story begins and where it ends – Bombay boy Shankar (Shreyas Talpade) runs off to Bangkok with a stash of loot belonging to a gangster (played gamely by a Distinguished Actor, who walks away with the single scene he’s in) – but to fully describe the journey Kukunoor attempts to take us through, the film would have to be called Road Movie to Flat-out Farce to Rom-com. It’s certainly an ambitious mix, but one that sounds better than it plays out. The road-movie and the rom-com aspects are far too generic to be of any interest, and only the sporadic bursts of comedy – like a superb fart joke that’s actually written into a scene and not just a gratuitous add-on to gross you out – keep your eyes from glazing over from the pointless tedium of it all (though, in all honesty, the late-night screening I caught the film at may have been a factor in my eyes almost glazing over).
One of the reasons to purchase a ticket for Bombay to Bangkok – or at least pause at the TV channel it’s playing on a few months hence – is the big, burly, Bangkok-based Sardar named Rash (Manmeet Singh, in a series of shirts with Hawaiian prints, each more flamboyant than the last) who ends up translator when Shankar falls for the Thai-speaking Jasmine (Lena Christensen). In one of the film’s sweetest scenes, he gives Shankar two scraps of paper – one with the Thai equivalent of Hindi words, the other with the reverse – so that Shankar and Jasmine can get along when they take off on a trip together. This is the very definition of a crowd-pleasing character (and a crowd-pleasing moment), and Singh piles on the good-natured shtick with such charm, you wish the film had invented a story around him – instead of the one between Shankar and Jasmine, who completely fail to convince you that they have feelings for (leave alone a future with) each other.
And even if this film had to be about an opposites-attract couple, you wish it had set out to detail the against-all-odds romance between the gangster Jamal Khan (an uproarious Vijay Maurya, playing this character as a teddy bear with a fondness for rap and bling) and the psychiatrist Rati (the terrific Jeneva Talwar). Jam K (which is how Jamal prefers to be called) is the son of the don from whom Shankar stole the money – he lands up in Bangkok in pursuit of the loot, but not after getting a hilarious lesson in geography from Shankar’s mother – and whether it’s fumbling with the zipper on his jacket in order to cover up as his father approaches or declaring his love for Rati entirely in singsong verse, he’s such a scene-stealer that he leaves a big hole on the screen whenever he’s not around.
After Iqbal and Dor, it appeared that Kukunoor had become an unlikely torchbearer of the middle-of-the-road legacy of the early Hrishikesh Mukherjee – there’s an inspired homage to the latter’s Bawarchi here, when Shankar (who’s a cook, like Rajesh Khanna in the earlier movie) whips up a desi feast as the background score bursts into that film’s Bhor aayi gaya andhiyara – but after Bombay to Bangkok, I’m not sure that’s what he wants to be. But wherever Kukunoor goes with his future ventures – with big stars like Akshay Kumar and John Abraham – it’s going to be fun to watch, if only because this director never really plays it safe. Even in a project as misbegotten as this one, you can hear the strains of the different drummer that Kukunoor marches to. He takes us all the way to Bangkok, and yet he can barely bring himself to care about the pretty scenery waiting to be snapped up on film. Elsewhere, he lets The Blue Danube play on the soundtrack when a prostitute and her client are getting undressed. There’s probably an in-joke there somewhere, in two people in Bangkok taking their clothes off to a Strauss waltz – but even if I couldn’t find it, I was happy the moment existed. Of such eccentricities are interesting filmmakers made.
Copyright ©2008 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
hrishi
January 19, 2008
wow. thanks for this. had almost decided to buy the tickets and go. can think of a better way to spend 3 hours.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
January 20, 2008
Some reviewers have actually commented that this movie probably isn’t written or directed by Nagesh. I think I will wait for Aashayein….
LikeLike
Balaji
January 20, 2008
offtopic(wish u had a special place for these comments/requests!) – had a chance to check our any of the tamil pongal releases? any chance of review(s)? 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
January 20, 2008
hrishi: so may I ask what “better” thing you did during those three hours? 🙂
Aditya: Really? I haven’t heard of this, and the credits did mention Kukunoor.
Balaji: Saw Bheemaa and Pirivom. Am writing about them in my column next week. so there is a chance — no, a certainty of (between) reviews 🙂
LikeLike
Shuchi
January 20, 2008
Some parts of this movie were really funny – the humor was different from the usual style in current Hindi movies. Jam K was priceless! I think the good bits made up for the the boring “romance” between the lead pair.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
January 20, 2008
BR: Oh, I meant it as a joke. What reviewers are saying is that after Iqbal and Dor, this doesn’t seem like the “new” Nagesh Kukunoor. Hence, the comment that it’s probably someone else 🙂
LikeLike
Shankar
January 20, 2008
Aditya, maybe Nagesh couldn’t find someone else’s story to rip off and not give any credits. As much as I liked this guy, I was terribly disappointed with his conduct after Dor came out. I guess he has made the transition from Atlanta to Bollywood…fully now!!
LikeLike
Arvind
January 20, 2008
Just watched the movie- an absolute turkey. Just wondering if you would have been as kind in your review if it had been directed by Dharmesh Darshan rather than by Kukunoor, given his great track record.
LikeLike
brangan
January 21, 2008
Shuchi: Yeah, Jam K and Rash made the movie at least partly endurable. Jam K’s “analysis” (with Rati diligently taking notes) had me in splits. And I loved, at the end, when he does the love-rap again, how she can’t keep a straight face — as if she knows how ridiculous he is, and yet can’t help loving him. 🙂
Shankar: Didn’t he just say he was inspired by the same *incident* that sparked off Perumazhakalam? That’s possible, no?
Arvind: Well, the comic bits kinda worked, so I didn’t find it an “absolute” turkey. And yeah, track record does play a part in how much you want to haul up a filmmaker for disappointing you. I mean, Dharmesh Darshan?
LikeLike
sureshkumar
January 21, 2008
brangan – revu on Jodhaa Akbar soundtrack please…
LikeLike
raj
January 21, 2008
br, if you are reviewing 2 tamil films, let it not be Bhima or Pirivom…Given the promos and the songs, it is obvious that Bhima is just crap reloaded and Pirivom is another from the TF staple of ‘good intentions…but execution?’ school.
Perhaps, not even good intentions in this case. I dont think these deserve an inch of your column space. Maybe, you can wait for Dasavatharam before you breathe anotehr word on Tamil Cinema…
LikeLike
Shankar
January 21, 2008
Baddy, if that is so, I wonder why he would buy the story rights from Kamal? He freely admits (much later) that it was Perumazhakkalam that provided the inspiration. He didn’t even know about the incident until he watched the malayalam original. Besides, the original *incident* happened in Kerala and was reported solely in malayalam newspapers which is highlighted right in the beginning of Perumazhakkalam.
http://www.rediff.com/movies/2006/sep/26nagesh.htm
LikeLike
Shankar
January 21, 2008
Don’t get me wrong…I do like Nagesh and his films. I enjoyed Teen Deewarein, Iqbal and most of his other films. So, I’m not anti-Nagesh or something. I’m not anti-anybody for that matter. I was just disappointed, that’s all.
LikeLike
brangan
January 22, 2008
sureshkumar: Don’t know about a proper review. I think I’ll talk about it in the column…
raj: Again, I’m not planning reviews as such. But you may be pleasantly surprised by Pirivom if you gave it a chance. And if I had to choose a film for my “comeback” to Tamil reviews, I think I’d go with Naan Kadavul over Dasavatharam. What say?
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
January 22, 2008
“maybe Nagesh couldn’t find someone else’s story to rip off and not give any credits”
Shankar: Just a good story doesn’t make a good film. I felt Dor was an extremely well made film. Even Iqbal that didn’t have much by way of story anyway…a ususal sports flick. So the point is that the ‘new, improved” Nagesh we saw in Teen Deewarein, Iqbal and Dor is missing in B2B
LikeLike
Shankar
January 22, 2008
Aditya, I agree Dor was a well made film…no questions about that. I haven’t seen B2B yet, maybe Nagesh suffered a temporary loss of form. BTW, have you seen the malayalam original of Dor, Perumazhakalam? Just curious… That was a very very well made film too.
LikeLike
ramkumar
January 22, 2008
hi rangan,i could sense condescension to tamil films frm ur comments…u overhype pseudo Indian films frm bollywood..tamil films try to be creative without aping western values..i know dat we are manipulated by dat style..bt we should give credit to tamil cinema for being more original…which critiics like u fail to do so…no offense..just an observation..
LikeLike
Raj
January 24, 2008
br, I know what you mean. If you hide other details, and give me a choice between a KS Ravikumar movie and a Bala film, which would I choose? It’s obvious. But God is in details and this KSR movie has a trump card in the detail – namely, Kamal. Besides, Naan Kadavul may or may not arrive sooner, or even later. And I have a feeling that Bala might have lost his edge(or edginess) – now that he is a ‘safe’, ‘married’, ‘normal’ person trying to set up his household
LikeLike
arun verma
January 31, 2008
I don’t understand why everyone has been bashing this movie — this is the most heartwarming romantic comedy to come out of bollywood since um,er..OK, Jab We Met but apart from JWM and Main meri patni aur woh (and I’ll give you Metro), which movies have managed to convincigly play the rom-com genre and yet be refreshingly different — I mean all we had during last 15 years was “Moronic remedy” (pun on rhyme intended!) from Sooraj Barjatya which was staple for us in this genre (Did someone say, David Dhawan? – that would be “Dementic Parody”)
Earlier, ofcourse we had great precedents in Farooque Shaikh’s Katha, chasm-e-badoor, rang birangi & some others like Rajnigandha, pati patni aur woh among other satisfying movies from Hrishda, Basu chatterjee etc. Ofocurse going back even further Dev Anand owed his whole career to this genre but somehow a human element was missing in 50s rom-coms from bombay – I don’t think audience really related to the on-goings on the screen but ofcourse came away entertained — those SD Burman and OP Nayyar scores played a huge role. Now we are noticing a revival of sorts — Jab we met being the pinnacle so far!!
Bombay to Bangkok isn’t a bad attempt either — just like the tagline of this movie, Nagesh made the movie his own way and a little “same same but different”.
I believe the central theme that Love will overcome the ‘communication gap’ (which plagues so many couples everywhere) is played out nicely (including the subtext of ‘make happy’ and numerous other scenes). The movie is calling for an open/liberal outlook and embracing differences among fellow people. Rapping Gangster with a heart and a serious no-nonsense looking doctor falling in love further establishes this theme.
Shreyas is the Amol Palekar/Farooque Shaikh of this generation (so is Nagesh the Hrisikesh Mukherjee of this generation — stuff like Dor and B2B is a testament to that). Shreyas did an amazing job and so did Vijay Maurya with his rapping ganster role.
There are gaping holes as well — in screenplay and in editing etc but I came away very satisfied !!
LikeLike
SUnil
March 15, 2008
do you know the name of the song which plays during the entry of JAM-K ?????????????//
LikeLike
madjack
May 2, 2008
its a very fresh approach. I just love this perspective. Thankyou so much nagesh for giving us such a beautiful movie. Honestly. Its difficult to find such an nice straight forward light hearted romantic comedy nowadays. Really cute. Kudos to Kuknoor. I just finished seeing this movie and I just had to comment on it. The only sad part is that it hasnt got enough marketing support and the title isnt catchy enough to grab someones attention to go see the movie. Its way to understated.
I just loved Manmeet, Gangster and Rati the dr. Rati(jeneva) I think looked stunning…
Keep rocking Nagesh!!!!
LikeLike