PATI, PATNI AUR WOE
Rajpal Yadav takes centrestage in a painful comedy about husbands and wives.
FEB 3, 2008 – MOST TIMES, IT’S A CHARMED LIFE, that of a critic. You get to catch up on all the latest releases, the ones that your poor friends are struggling to make time for between balancing homelife and career. You get to answer lunchtime questions such as “What are you doing later this afternoon?” with “Oh, you know, watching the new Hrithik-Aishwarya starrer,” when the person next to you is likely to confess, “Well, there’s a staff meeting for which I’ve got to make a PowerPoint presentation. Got to run now. Bye.” So I guess it was only a matter of time before the tables turned. As is the ritual, I was asked what the film to be reviewed this week was, and when I replied Rama Rama Kya Hai Dramaaa, I could sense the voice at the other end change in inflection from borderline envy to barely-concealed glee. Had my life been an animated film strip, it appeared that this would be the point where I’d be surrounded by my near and dear, standing with arms akimbo, throwing their heads back and letting loose demonic peals of laughter. And then they asked who was in it and I said Rati Agnihotri and Anupam Kher and Rajpal Yadav and Razzak Khan, and the resultant doubling over and clutching of stomachs and pounding of tables with the other palm left me in no doubt that schadenfreude was alive and kicking in the world.
It’s not just me. I don’t think anyone was happy walking into the theatre screening Chandrakant Singh’s Rama Rama Kya Hai Dramaaa. As I seated myself, there was barely a handful of people, but then the lights went down and the seats started filling up. The logical way to look at this would be that they tried their darnedest to sneak into one of the other films in the multiplex, but when that wasn’t looking likely, they decided not to waste the evening and got tickets for this at the last minute and walked in late. But watching this disaster unfold, it appeared there may be another explanation: maybe they were simply too embarrassed to be caught walking in, which is why they preferred to make an entrance in the dark, heads lowered, scarves and sunglasses in place. After all, who’d want to be seen watching Rajpal Yadav play a husband who, after a spat with wife Neha Dhupia, begins to imagine other people’s wives as his own? This is one of those films where we’re meant to be entertained while being edified about the institution of marriage, what with gems like “Patniyan ghar ko swarg banati hain… aur pati ko swargwasi,” and “Pati ghoda hota hai… us pe lagaam daalna chahiye.” In between these lines extolling husbands as horses and wives as the ones who drive their men to their deaths, Sanjay Mishra chimes in with malapropisms, substituting “bloody fool” for “beautiful” and “toilet” for “tolerate.” I guess he’d call this film “terrific” – for “terrible.”
Copyright ©2008 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Shuchi
February 2, 2008
I am so sorry you had to sit through this!
I have never heard of this movie before but isn’t that Ashish Choudhary in the pic opposite Rajpal Yadav? He gets no mention in your review, so I gather his role was even smaller than those of Rati Agnihotri and Anupam Kher and Rajpal Yadav and Razzak Khan. The guy is so good-looking, why doesn’t he get meatier roles in the movies? Sheesh.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 2, 2008
I usually watch almost every new Hindi release, but I feel sorry for you. I have at least the power to choose, which you don’t 😉
LikeLike
Mickie
February 2, 2008
Such a short review..so unlike you! That just about says it all.
LikeLike
Anusha
February 2, 2008
The write-up says it all – the agony and the anguish!
LikeLike
brangan
February 2, 2008
Shuchi: Actually he did have a bit of a role. Not much to talk about, though.
Aditya Pant: Yeah, these are the times that PowerPoint life almost seems heaven in comparison 🙂
Mickie: What? You mean my reviews are usually long? Get outta here 🙂
Anusha: alliterative assuaging… ah!
LikeLike
Krishna
February 3, 2008
just curious, rangan. do you get to say “no, thanks” when the assignment at hand is this non-tempting 🙂 i mean, can’t you do any generic piece on film instead? or is this sacred space that has to have the weekly fill-in?
LikeLike
Priti
February 3, 2008
occupational hazard eh? this one? 😀
LikeLike
Suderman
February 3, 2008
Guessing you didn’t like Rambo much! 🙂
LikeLike
SB
February 4, 2008
this review is more entertaining than the movie! not that i’ve seen it but i’m pretty confident of that. for the record, i still think tolerating a rajpal yadav flick every now and then is not as bad an occupational hazard as being chained to a cubicle all day crunching numbers…:)
LikeLike
Mickie
February 4, 2008
AWWW not at all…gimme a good long thought provoking review anyday to a couple of hrs of a BAD movie. Like so many people have said already, you are the voice to the words on my mind.(though ‘extolling’ and malapropisms’ don’t come to my mind as easily as it does, to you…but then thats why YOU are the reviewer..) the only exception so far, your Taare…review. Have to thank you for that. Started watching it totally prepared to be disappointed. Was not at all expecting to like it the way I did, so thank you 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
February 4, 2008
Krishna: If there’s a new Hindi release, it gets a review. I don’t get to pick and choose. But that’s the case everywhere, right? I mean, do people in other lines of work don’t exactly get to pick and choose what they do?
Priti: yup, hazard is right.
Suderman: Actually, I had fun. But we don’t do reviews a week late, so…
SB: yeah, number crunching puts things in perspective.
Mickie: AWWW 🙂
LikeLike
s
February 5, 2008
but have to admire you though, you do come up with different ways to write for the bad movies.(except for the monkey typing the script part)
LikeLike
Suganth
February 5, 2008
Hi Baradwaj,
Despite your lament, I think you reviewers do live a charmed life. Two hours of boredom occasionally is never a really bad. If u still feel bad about watching such films, how about swapping jobs with me? 😉
LikeLike
Priyanka
February 6, 2008
Does your frame of mind ever affect your review? Do you always watch these movies alone or do you have company?
Sometimes the right kind of crowd/ mood makes a drab movie more watchable…
Just curious….
LikeLike
brangan
February 7, 2008
s: That’s part of the job, what?
Suganth: Oh I agree. Cubicle life… brrrr!
Priyanka: “Does your frame of mind ever affect your review?” Inevitable, no? Besides, there wasn’t a soul in the theatre enjoying this film.
LikeLike
s
February 8, 2008
In my previous comment, just wanted to refer to your constant( I have noticed only 3 times) use of,”a bunck of monkeys running across a typewriter will come up with a better script…”
that didn’t come out right. Sorry about that.
LikeLike
Priyanka
February 8, 2008
What I meant was, sometimes I have enjoyed a movie solely because of the company I have been in. A movie might be terrible, but watching it with a bunch of fun friends makes the ‘bad’ movie unintentionally funny and very entertaining! The same movie when I watch again, thinking how much I enjoyed the first time, am left questioning my sanity and how I could ever even like it in the first place!!
As reviewer, does the company you are in while writing up a review ever affect the verdict? Is it easy to be rational without getting caught up in the ambient mood?
LikeLike
Mayur Panchamia
May 8, 2021
Nice..
LikeLike