SARDAR RAJ
Akshay Kumar’s new film wants to crown him box office emperor. What it doesn’t want is to be any good.
AUG 10, 2008 – THE CHARACTER THAT SONU SOOD PLAYS in Anees Bazmee’s Singh is Kinng is named Lucky, but perhaps Akshay Kumar (who plays Happy Singh) should have been the beneficiary of that felicitous moniker. The numerous ways that Happy gets lucky – except, of course, that way, he being a good Indian boy and all – make it appear that he was born under a shooting star, and grew up in a nursery littered with horseshoes and four-leafed clovers, with a giant Buddha by the bedside whose belly was flattened by constant rubbing. When Happy lands up in Australia – he’s come there looking for Lucky, who’s a don who needs to be carted back to India, back to their village – he has nowhere to go, no one to turn to, and a flower lady (Kirron Kher) just happens to stumble upon him. Not only is she Indian, she’s a Punjabi too – as well as the mother of Sonia (Katrina Kaif), whom Happy had fallen in love with in Egypt, where he just happened to end up when he inadvertently swapped flight tickets with a stranger, who just happened to be Puneet (Ranvir Shorey), Sonia’s boyfriend.
Incredulous coincidences have always been a staple of the cinema, even the ones we revere as classics, and – warning: wildly inappropriate comparison ahead – I was reminded, suddenly, of Casablanca. (I know. I know.) Now there’s something that’s widely considered an all-time great, and yet, its plot is kicked into motion by the happenstance – at least, it seems that way for a while – of Ingrid Bergman finding herself, one evening, in Humphrey Bogart’s nightclub. They were lovers long ago and they lost touch, and now, after all these years, she conveniently winds up in his proximity. We’re beginning to roll our eyes, when Bogart remarks, “Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine.” The reason that line is remembered today isn’t simply that it’s been crafted just so – it practically roils in rhyme – but because, with it, Bogart essentially dissipates our misgivings about the situation. He himself finds it ridiculous, and he’s drawing our attention to it – and therefore, we’re stranded without weapons. That’s what good writing can do – disarm our scepticism, or, to use a phrase more widely prevalent today, make us suspend our disbelief.
But who cares about good writing anymore, especially in a moviegoing culture where brain-dead films are considered the same as brain-dead filmmaking? In other words, not requiring the audience to apply themselves while watching a film has become a license for not applying yourself while making the film – when the reality is what they say about dying being comparatively easy. The best brain-dead comedy requires a lot more thought and work – besides actors who know the precise second to slip on that banana peel – than, say, a straight-up drama, where a reasonably involving storyline is capable of covering up a multitude of sins both behind and in front of the camera. Then again, the point of Singh is Kinng isn’t so much comedy as the coronation of Akshay Kumar as box office kinng. Don’t take my word for it. Just watch the sequence where Amitabh Bachchan and Shah Rukh Khan and Hrithik Roshan and Aamir Khan are reduced to mere sidekicks. The scene, actually, involves a few goons carrying out a kidnapping while wearing masks of these superstars, but isn’t the subtext unmistakable? And with that kind of overarching agendum, who’s got the time to be bothered about trivialities like writing?
Akshay Kumar continues to work on – or, perhaps, hammer in – the earthy self-effacing simpleton persona that’s worked so well for him of late. I’ll give him this much – it’s an extremely clever strategy to distinguish himself from every other hero (except maybe Sunny Deol). “You guys are welcome to the multiplex audiences,” the actor appears to be announcing in film after film, “and I’ll lord over the rest of the country, through the single screens.” (He seems to have leafed through the rulebooks of the big heroes of Tamil and Telugu cinema.) But in Singh is Kinng, he’s barely got a part to play. He’s there from beginning to end, but you don’t get the sense of joy in the performance that was there in, say, Tashan (which, for all its faults, at least gave him a nicely detailed character). Happy has a scene where he serves aloo parathas for breakfast, and when Puneet winces, he vows that, henceforth, the “Angrezon-wala breakfast” will be served, which, according to him, consists of doodh and chiwda. (Get it? He’s such a wholesome son-of-the-soil, he can’t even say “cornflakes.” Take that, you Kellogg’s-slurping PVR/INOX frequenters.)
But what are we to make of this scene? Who is it serving – Happy Singh, the character, or Akshay Kumar, the actor? Because if it were about the character, wouldn’t someone this clueless about modern urban life find himself at sea in Australia? Wouldn’t his adventures mirror those of the earthy self-effacing simpleton Bihari that Madhavan played in Ramji Londonwaley? Oh, but I’m sorry – thinking isn’t allowed in films such as this one. (I keep forgetting that. Damn!) And thus the Singh is Kinng juggernaut rolls on, throwing at us a shaky love triangle, several intolerable moments of four-hanky sentiment, a gratuitous love-conquers-all message (“Nafrat ko sirf pyaar se hi mitaya jaa sakta hai”), and even a dance item by Javed Jaffrey. (Why? Who knows? Maybe the actor felt it was time to remind audiences that he still has the loose limbs from his Bol baby bol days.) It’s all one sloppy mess of comedy and action and drama – with two exquisite high points. One is Manoj Pahwa’s hilarious throwaway dig about Shah Rukh Khan, and the other is a blessedly politically incorrect sight gag involving a patient in a wheelchair. Or maybe they’re not all that great, and maybe they just appear to be high points because, unlike the rest of Singh is Kinng, they at least leave you with the illusion of being entertained.
Copyright ©2008 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without
Srinivas
August 9, 2008
There are bad movies and there are some terrible movies …but to achieve this level of dreck is seriously an achievement for the makers!! Walked out halfway..Have not done that for a long time 🙂
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
August 9, 2008
After some forced time away from watching movies in theatre, I broke my ‘fast’ with this pathetic movie. Not that I had much expectations from the film, but I at least expected a few lol moments. Sadly, there were none (I don’t even recall that SRK dig you mention….shows how bored I was). But the worst part is that the crowd seemed to be rolling in the their seats at every gag. So this film clearly worked for many people!
LikeLike
Chaitanya
August 9, 2008
/*Digression Alert!*/
I’ve just come back from ‘The Dark Knight’ and I wanted to tell you what I ‘thought’ of the movie.
The story is VERY clever. GOOD had to win over the EVIL, but a victory of good would have been mundane and expected. So, the story gives us Two-Face – an victory of the evil.
It is supposed to balance what happens on those ships and we are ‘supposed’ to come out of the theater feeling that we’ve watched an high intensity moral-ethical drama.
I felt slightly cheated and I came out not entirely empty-handed but not entirely full-handed either.
Let me try to put it in words.
The triumph of evil in Two-Face comes out to nothing. He is killed, by his own undoing.
The victory of good saves the ships and all the people on them. (The story cannot resist the cheesiness, the playing to the gallery there – the convict choosing to throw out the detonator first and the civilian still undecided and all that 🙂 )
The victory of Evil has very little effect – it is not devastating in its impact. Two-Face dies. In the end, a bad man gets what he deserved.
What if the civilian blew up the boat of the convicts, ‘after’ they had already already thrown out the detonator?
This all made me think that the story ‘wanted’ to show the triumph of good over evil, but, all along, it wanted us not to understand what it wanted to do. It threw us a bait – a bait most people would catch.
That is why I would call the movie as good, nearing great. But it did not quite achieve it.
Also, I might have liked the movie more had I not read ‘The Devil and Miss Prym’ earlier. 🙂
I know I have written totally off-topic thing here. But I badly needed to tell you this.
And I would love to hear your opinions about my thoughts – if it is not too much to ask!
LikeLike
Sujith
August 9, 2008
After No Entry I had somewhat high expectations from Aneez Basmee, that came down after Welcome, and after Singh is King remains at the same lower level.
Were side characters promised some kind of backup story that never finally ended up on screen?
LikeLike
kaush
August 10, 2008
Bravo! This was so true and a very hilarious review too. I have been a silent reader for a while but I just saw this movie and am fresh from the $9 loss that I could have used to eat a nice dinner and ice cream. I mean you just put everything so perfectly in words – awesome writing!
LikeLike
Manish
August 10, 2008
Brangan, no mention of soundtrack. I really like the album outside the film. I have not yet seen the film
LikeLike
raj
August 10, 2008
This is comeuppance for audience who appreciated Om shanti Om, even mildly 🙂
LikeLike
Bhargs
August 10, 2008
After Govinda, Akshay seems to be the one who is set to churn out mediocre comedy oriented flicks.
But, I observe a slight difference between these two. while Govinda was aiming at the masses, AK mixes it cleverly, the movie is primarily for the masses but his movies seem to have music that appeal to the classes/multiplex/young generation.
LikeLike
brangan
August 10, 2008
Srinivas: You know I’ve never ever been able to do that? If I begin watching something, I just HAVE to finish it. Yeah, I know…
Aditya Pant: I know. I mentioned this in my review of Namastey London, I think – the fact that I sat there unmoved while everyone around was bursting with laughter.
Chaitanya: “high intensity moral-ethical drama: I agree with, but I’m not sure I see Two-Face being the manifestation of EVIL. If anything, I felt he represented the greay area between Batman and Joker.
Sujith: Yeah – I would have liked to see more of Yashpal Sharma. He kept threatening to grow into a full-fledged comic character, but they kept cutting him off.
kaush: Thank you. Is that all a ticket costs? A while back, the Indian films used to be priced higher than the regular films, and taking into account inflation and all, $9 seems a good deal 🙂
Manish: I liked Teri Ore. But I’m afraid I’m not much of a fan of either boisterous bhangra-pop or Snoop…
raj: Ah, the President of the Farah Khan fan club strikes again 🙂
Bhargs: I think those Govinda films worked better because we never thought of him as a “hero” and he was far looser at the crazy stuff than AK (or any other “hero”) can ever hope to be. There’s too much baggage at stake.
LikeLike
Rags B
August 10, 2008
Consensus ad idem!
The hall was packed with audiences going crazy over the stupid comedy. I just couldnt do anything but sit there dumb…..Whose fault is it, the movie makers or the movie goers??
Also, the story is a take on the Jackie Chan movie “Mr Canton and Lady Rose”….guess i got that rite
LikeLike
Lee
August 10, 2008
I have a question. Why are BW critics (excluding you) and fans so fricking childish? King of BW? Who cares? Do you see any other cinema industry going around calling someone king? King of HW? King of French cinema? King of Chinese cinema? No wonder BW is still laughed at by outsiders. They behave as if the industry is high school and there is a constant popularity contest.
According to the media, the reigning King and Queen are Akshay and Katrina. How sad is that?
Maybe as an outsider I see things differently. I have come to appreciate indian cinema but will never understand this aspect – no offense to anyone.
LikeLike
kaos
August 11, 2008
It seems to me that there is a large urban multiplex-going audience for this kind of film? – I can’t explain the Snoop Dogg song and its ilk any other way. So, I’d actually argue that this is as much for the PVR/INOX’ers as the single-screen’ers…
LikeLike
s
August 11, 2008
I give up. I want to be part of the crowd that laughs and enjoys these movies but I just don’t know how to get there.
LikeLike
Anwar Puttarjee
August 11, 2008
Absolutely agree with you, Lee.
LikeLike
raj
August 11, 2008
Lee, you cant exclude BR from that list. He does sometimes make *fawning* references to Akshay Kumar’s ‘charisma’, ‘box office pull’, ‘anything that Saif touches turns to Gold’ etc. Which is not exactly BO-King-fying but not much different anyway. Bollywood is full of self-inflating and proxy-inflated personalities, and pretty much thats what they have. Not that they dont make *great* movies but if they make a great movie, it becomes not just *great*, it becomes *ultra-super-all-time-best-great*, if you see what I mean. And BR is not free of this habit that Bollywood inculcates in all its followers.
LikeLike
raj
August 11, 2008
Again, BR, I am not sure whats your problem with this movie or this genre at any rate. Just that it doesnt work for you? Or, did I catch the slightest looking down upon those to your left and right who seemed to be enjoying it? Maybe, they are seeing something in this movie just the way the farah-khan-types seem to find ‘classic’s in Manmohan desai type movies? I mean, if there are people whoc an find Main Hoon Na a classic, surely, there can be people who find SiK a time-pass paisa vasool, as they’d put it? I mean, is there any justification why the former should look down upon the latter?
LikeLike
karthik
August 11, 2008
Rangan…Sometimes people are just in the mood for such flcks – full no-sense, sit back and relax and enjoy pure masala fun akin to a thaal meal. Sivaji represented the same and does King…..good thing is that its unpretentious in its motive unlike say Dasvatharam that promised an Italian Salad and gave us a full fledged Nandini’s Thaali with spices on the side !
LikeLike
Anand
August 11, 2008
Karthik..to each his own.
I found Dasavatharam more entertaining, did not insult my intelligence(rather I was able to peel layers after watching it twice). Yeah..one of my friends found Raja Chinna Roja better than Nayakan. To each his own.
LikeLike
Anand
August 11, 2008
By the way, Dasavathaaram promised 10 roles of Kamal. What else did it promise?
LikeLike
brangan
August 11, 2008
Rags B: Contra mundum is more like it, no?
Lee: I guess in this instance it’s because, right from inception, this film has been touted as the one that will make AK the “super star” or whatever. It’s silly, I know, but I think it’s far more terrifying that Katrina is Queen 🙂
kaos: Yeah, like Bhargs said, there’s that attempt to differentiate this from, say a Sunnyy Deol-style mass movie.
s: “I want to be part of the crowd that laughs and enjoys these movies” – oh but why? The other set is so much cooler 😉
karthik: I’m sorry, but I feel that even a “no-sense movie” has to have something to it. But as Anand says, to each his own,
Anand: “Raja Chinna Roja better than Nayakan” – you certainly do have interesting friends 🙂
LikeLike
Anand
August 11, 2008
BRangan, he was a friend before 20 years..now have lost touch!! There were lot of gems at that time; Some felt Karagattakaran was better than Idayathai Thirudadhe(both released around the same time). I remember passionate discussions about Chatriyan and Kizakku Vasal(Ardent Mani fans felt Chatriyan was better but some of us felt KV was better)!! I have been missing all these discussions for all these years, but thanks to the net now, I am again reliving those passionate days!!
LikeLike
raj
August 11, 2008
Ah! Anand, Karagattakaran was, indeed, better than Idyathai Thirudadhae:-)
LikeLike
raj
August 11, 2008
“s: “I want to be part of the crowd that laughs and enjoys these movies” – oh but why? The other set is so much cooler”
That nails it. Explain in not less than 200 words why 🙂
LikeLike
Ramesh
August 11, 2008
Raj:
Finally, you caught BR. Congrats LOL!
LikeLike
maxdavinci
August 12, 2008
Oh how i hate it when somebody is right! I pushed out my review yesterday and came to work so see what you would have posted.
I see AK taking the BigB path of playing to the masses and carrying mediocre films on his shoulders. Remm Suhaag, parwarish etc?
Also he has identified a market that is untapped. While the rest are out to woo the teens and sway women. AK just goes after the masses.
I however felt that he had to sleepwalk through the role like an extension of namastey london. bad film? yea, impressive akshay? defn!
LikeLike
Deepauk M
August 12, 2008
Casablanca?? Referenced in this movie review ?? Brangan, why this kolai veri?? And you try to exonerate yourself by doing a Raghuvaran in Parentheses ?? Ok I’ll stop with all the question marks 🙂 .
LikeLike
brangan
August 12, 2008
maxdavinci: You had to get to work to see my review? Interesting 🙂
Deepauk M: Hey, I did say “warning: wildly inappropriate comparison ahead” – now stop quibbling. That’s *my* job 🙂
LikeLike
maxdavinci
August 12, 2008
I don’t check my feeds on the weekend. That’s reserved fro the office!
LikeLike
maxdavinci
August 12, 2008
well I don’t use my feed reader during the weekend.
I use them to kill my monday morning blues. and plus blogs are a 9-5 thing!
LikeLike
Ravi K
August 12, 2008
Is it just me or are the turbans that Akshay wears in the stills for this film nothing like an actual Sikh turban?
LikeLike
Chaitanya
August 18, 2008
Man oh man!
You are really harsh on Singh is King.
You know what I felt while watching it?
THIS IS ‘GOOD OLD BOLLYWOOD’!
The tradition is alive and kicking!
Manmohan Desai used to make such movies.
Non-sense, illogical, absurd, but really fun while you are watching it.
I enjoyed it thoroughly.
Maybe, you walked in with different set of expectations.
LikeLike
Rishi
August 18, 2008
What happened to just enjoying movies?
I’m surprised how much people are content to analyse a movie like Singh is Kinng and trash it based on how “stupid” it is.
I don’t know how someone can’t watch it and just simply enjoy it for what it is – mindless, but not stupid, entertainment.
LikeLike
raj
August 19, 2008
chaitanya, but Manmohan Desai made ‘CLASSICS’- that is the difference :-).
Ofcourse, SiK will be a classic in a couple of decades and there will be Athreya Venkatesans heaping praise on Nearah Khans in 2021 for brilliantly referencing Welcome, Singh is King and the like.
LikeLike
Rithvik
November 10, 2021
So, are they any Athreya Venkatesans heaping praise on Nearah Khans in 2021 for brilliantly referencing Welcome, Singh is King and the like?
LikeLike