SHADES OF GAY
Bollywood comes out of the closet in a bright comedy that quickly congeals into tedious drama. Plus, “Anand” for the multiplex set.
NOV 16, 2008 – ONE WAY TO LOOK AT TARUN MANSUKHANI’S DOSTANA is as a bona fide pop-culture phenomenon. This is a bold, brave film that doesn’t just treat its heroes as the equivalent of comic sidekicks, but as the equivalent of heroines. The item girl in the song that plays over the opening credits is Shilpa Shetty, who’s got the best body in the business today, but the camera elects to feast on John Abraham’s near-naked curves instead. And in a subsequent sequence – a romantic “flashback” in Venice – Abhishek Bachchan adopts the swishiest set of mannerisms to portray the feminine half of a gay couple. Dostana has got to be the first Bollywood movie in which a macho hero (Abhishek) is inspired to pose as gay a second before wrapping his lips around a suggestively shaped hot dog, and where another equally macho hero (John) goes to sleep with an eye mask emblazoned with the come-hither advertisement, “Well Hung.” Even if, compared to something like Brokeback Mountain, the extent of edge-pushing here is merely a matter of, uh, inches (the gayness aspect is mainly comic filler), this is truly some sort of milestone, if only because the heroes aren’t saddled with compensatory scenes – with guest-starring heroines, say – calculated to demonstrate their heterosexuality. They gamely play gay, and that’s all there is to it.
The problem, unfortunately, is that all of this is fascinating fodder for a sociocultural thesis, while as a movie-watching experience, Dostana is disappointingly flat – not merely wobbly in its intentions about just how far to take its gay angle without alienating a wide audience, but boring and bland as a romantic melodrama as well. It begins as a nicely giddy farce, with Abhishek Bachchan (playing Sameer) and John Abraham (as Kunal) hatching a scheme to pose as a gay couple in order to secure a swank Miami apartment. These portions spill over with slapstick, some of which works, a lot of which doesn’t – but at least the novelty of the situation, along with the off-the-wall energy of the actors, keeps us watching. (Frankly, though, Shah Rukh Khan and Saif Ali Khan were twice as funny with their gay routine in Kal Ho Naa Ho, which is an obvious inspiration, and which lasted just half as long as it does here.) But soon, Sameer and Kunal fall for Neha (a blisteringly good-looking Priyanka Chopra), and Abhimanyu (Bobby Deol) jumps into the fray to compete for her hand, and the film quickly becomes unrecognisable from the bouncy comedy we started out with. Where there once was fun and gay frolic, there’s now tears and recriminations and a surprising amount of meanspiritedness.
Mansukhani apprenticed with Karan Johar, and the only creditable trait he appears to have imbibed from his mentor is how to put on a heck of a song-and-dance show. The staging of Vishal-Shekhar’s insanely addictive Desi girl is everything we go to Hindi movies for – a big, rousing celebration of booty-shaking choreography. Otherwise, Mansukhani has inherited every single one of Johar’s bad habits – like the endless self-referencing (to Johar’s films, including three nods to Kuch Kuch Hota Hai) and the intolerably broad humour that even a talent like Boman Irani cannot redeem to any extent. (Remember the dreadful “black beast” episode in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna? This is worse.) Johar displayed a significantly more sophisticated funny-side in Kal Ho Naa Ho, and Mansukhani attempts to mine that vein by going for a Tarantinoesque riff about why Gabbar Singh was gay, but the gag isn’t allowed to build. Like many scenes in Dostana, this riff has no rhythm, no momentum. And where Johar usually makes up for his other failings with his handling of the big-bang emotional stretches, the dramatic moments here are so synthetic and underdeveloped, you barely care about the outcome of the romantic rectangle. When Sameer and Kunal, themselves, seem more interested in playing gay than in winning over Neha, why should we care?
Is this a failing of the screenplay – that Abhishek Bachchan and John Abraham appear more of a couple with each other than either of them does with Priyanka Chopra – or is it a deliberately subversive subtext in a story that handles homosexuality to an extent unprecedented in a Hindi film? It’s hard to say – because the scenes that do address homosexuality in an explicit fashion come across as hasty afterthoughts, added on because the gay angle, so far, was simply gravy. Kirron Kher (who plays Sameer’s mother) is used mainly as a hammy comic element – she’s distraught that her son isn’t likely to bring home a daughter-in-law – and, out of nowhere, we’re asked to stifle our sniffles at her acceptance of Kunal as a son-in-law. As for Kunal, he gets a moment that’s far more bogus, when he confesses, at the end, that the family he’s built over the course of the film is because he chose to be gay. If this is a message of acceptance and tolerance being beamed across to a country that can barely bring itself to discuss heterosexual issues without sniggering, it doesn’t quite come across that way. The suddenness of the sentiment, instead, makes it seem merely like business as usual in Bollywood, where even a setup this unconventional is incomplete without a payoff that makes an unapologetic bid for easy tears.
IMAGINE ANAND WITH A STEELIER SPINE (namely, without the crinkly-eyed sunshiney optimism of Rajesh Khanna), and cross it with the scene from It’s a Wonderful Life where a despondent James Stewart is about to throw himself off a bridge (except that the guardian angel that saves him is now a hooker), and then work in the Jimmy Shergill subplot from Munnabhai MBBS, and add to this mix the man-dying-from-stomach-cancer device from Ikuru – and you’ve barely scratched the surface of the weird, whimsical, wonderful Dasvidaniya. The ironically named Amar (an excellent Vinay Pathak) discovers that he’s not immortal after all, and having just a few months to live, he makes a bucket list, a list of things to do before he kicks the bucket. (He’s always been a compulsive list-maker. It’s just that, now, his list isn’t filled with reminders to repair the bathroom geyser and buy vegetables, but to go abroad and buy a fancy car and so on.) I felt, initially, a vague shudder, an inward groan that this would turn out to be one of those insufferably life-affirming message movies, but it’s a blessed miracle how director Shashant Shah skillfully negotiates the life-affirming-message-movie part without ever letting his film become insufferable.
The success of Dasvidaniya is largely due to the exertions of its excellent cast – a casual list of highlights would include Sarita Joshi (as Amar’s mother) bursting with unbridled joy when Amar takes her out in his new car, Ranvir Shorey preening as a low-rent lothario, Saurabh Shukla making art from the act of stuffing his mouth, Neha Dhupia discovering that Amar really loves her, and Rajat Kapoor (a Mithun fan, who answers to Gunmaster G9) embracing his “chaddi buddy” Amar at the airport. (Even the minor characters are remarkable, like the girl who sells Amar his car or the cranky old man beside Amar on a flight.) What lifts Dasvidaniya to a different plane altogether is that the behind-the-scenes work is almost on par – whether it’s the amazingly colourful dialogue by Arshad Syed (which includes one of the funniest fart lines ever) or the score by Kailash Kher, Paresh and Naresh (whose theme perfectly encapsulates the past and the present of Amar’s situation, through a wistfully nostalgic five-note piano riff underscored by the propulsive drive of a snare drum). The few missteps – a melodramatic development with Suchitra Pillai, a trying-too-hard bit with a tantrik – are easily forgiven in a film that fondly looks back to old-Bollywood tropes even as it recasts them in a multiplex mould. Who could have imagined, for instance, that Pal bhar ke liye koi hamein pyaar kar le could function just as much as a wholesome love song as a winking ode to the pleasures of transitory love, courtesy a Russian prostitute?
Copyright ©2008 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Srinivas
November 15, 2008
Dunno how brave and bold all that was…even if the heroes are not saddled with compensatory heroines – they ogle at PC at every chance so that we do not forget that they are just playing gay. And every guy other than those two is a flaming queer. Even AB in the fake flashback adopts the swishiest of mannerisms. The audience was definitely not laughing with them. The way they manipulate the child in the scond half was just unbelievable. Still, I suppose, baby steps..
LikeLike
a
November 15, 2008
looks like you were far more impressed by dasvidanya than dostana. so how come it gets the shorter review?
LikeLike
Vivek
November 16, 2008
Good Review. Waiting for your review on Vaaranam Aayiram 🙂
LikeLike
rakesh
November 16, 2008
Are you in any way involved with the project “Kadhal2Kalyanam” ? Saw the promotional still in today’s newspaper!
LikeLike
James
November 16, 2008
Dostana was a blast! What’s your damage? The gay track was only used for laughs and to make the movie interesting! Both Kunal and Sameer were very sexually attracted to Neha. They both showed romantic interest in her until they both realised that she was miserable without Abhimanyu and they chose to reunite her with him because they did not want to lose her friendship. I guess the haters finally got to you for being a fan of Abhishek Bachchan and his acting, eh? So to prove them wrong you give his performance and Dostana a negative review. Its predictable. You can easily justify liking a very badly written movie like Drona, but bash the hell out of a good comedy movie like Dostana? It’s bollocks!
When was the last bloody time a good comedy came out of Bollywood? It’s been years until Dostana. Abhishek was the star of Dostana. His acting held the movie together. Dostana was busting gut hilarious. And trust me the audiences were loving the movie and laughing their arses off. It’s unfortunate that you caved into the pressure of the anti-Abhishek Bachchan brigade. And wrote this negative review to appease them and show your street cred. All it has done is made me lose all of the respect I had for the one critic in Bollywood who I thought was worthy. But you Rangan are just like all the rest of those hack ‘critics’ in Bollywood who can either be bought or bullied into submission. Good riddens to this site!
LikeLike
sm
November 16, 2008
This may be off topic, but I was particularly struck by this phrase in your Dostana review:
“Johar displayed a significantly more sophisticated funny-side in Kal Ho Naa Ho,…”
Why? Well, because Johar did not direct Kal Ho Naa Ho! And yet, it seems as if poor Nikhil Advani is completely forgotten as the director of that film by everyone. I can sigh at the inaccuracies of the usual Bollywood press, but I did not expect this from you. The question of interest to me is, why has Advani’s name and association with KHNH been so thoroughly eclipsed? Will Tarun Manusukhani also suffer the same fate in future?
LikeLike
Ravi
November 16, 2008
Hey Rangan Bhai,
I just love the way u put it – inheriting bad habits from Karan Johar – LOL. Also, waiting for ur Vaaranam Aayiram review (and ur trip to Hyderabad!)
LikeLike
Ravi
November 16, 2008
Aaarggghhh…I had to ask you come to hyd while commenting about the review of a gay movie??? My intentions are ‘straight’!!!
LikeLike
brangan
November 16, 2008
A letter to the paper…
Dear Baradwaj,
Your review in the Sunday Express today, thankfully, has reinforced my belief that I am, indeed, a normal heterosexual person! I must hasten to explain.
Hindi movies & I are poles apart. I usually get to watch a few that have received critical acclaim, much after the hysteria has died down. On Friday (14th Nov) night, I was to drop the little lady at Satyam Cinemas and was unwittingly roped in, as there was an extra ticket. Entering the premises was a nightmare, the traffic snarls and mass anxiety, which then makes a mockery of the little social graces that human kind seems to offer now, to get in on time to see the movie was something I have not seen at Chennai (at least amongst, the supposedly educated elite).
I was fortunate enough to miss the opening sequences of the movie. For the next hour or so, until the intermission, I was treated to such puerile claptrap that offended my sensibilities. Portraying gays in the manner that Abishek was made to, at least in the “ Venice ” scene, left me wondering, if this is all, that we as a society, can offer, to bring in these marginalized lot, into the mainstream. Not only are our laws on homosexuality draconian, if Hindi Cinema which is acknowledged as the medium of mass public opinion, has this ludicrous offering, we Indians have eons to go before, they we look beyond our parochial noses!
The humor, at best, can be termed as cretinous! And the way the audience was lapping it up, honestly made me believe that there was something really wrong with me. The group of youngsters sitting in the row behind me was uncontrollable in their response to every innuendo. For the life of me, I could not see the funny side of the movie.
It did not take much for me to get up at the intermission and go home for a well deserved night’s rest. I missed nothing, especially after reading your critique of the later half of the movie, which to me appears to have been a mish mash of Hindi movie melodrama and a plot that had lost its way!
Do publish this as a response or a view, if your Editor deems it worthwhile.
LikeLike
brangan
November 16, 2008
rakesh: yup, that’s me. Eagle eyes, eh? 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
November 16, 2008
sm: But KJ was the one who wrote KHNH, so I was talking about that.
LikeLike
sm
November 16, 2008
# brangan Says:
sm: But KJ was the one who wrote KHNH, so I was talking about that.
Yes, Mr. Rangan, I am aware of that. But this is a recognition that is given only to Karan Johar about KHNH. The convention of treating a film as being “by” its director derives from the auteur theory, and is pretty blindly followed in Bollywood. For what other films is the writer credited over the director for its perceived qualities? Isn’t Fanaa, for instance, referred to as Kunal Kohli’s film, even though Shibani Bhatija gained some recognition for writing it? Isn’t Saawariya considered to be Bhansali’s film, even though the original story was written by Doetoevsky and it was adapted to the screen by Prakash Kapadia and Vibhu Puri? Though there are other well known writers, when were they ever credited with a film over its director (except, of course, Salim-Javed in their heyday)? There is something I can’t fathom about this one instance.
Anyway, you can ignore this comment if you think it is too picayune. 🙂
LikeLike
Footydoc
November 16, 2008
Dostana struck me as a fun-film with the “gay” theme being the peg to hang the gags on. Yes, it might be unconventional for Bollywood and would help push the gay agenda into the limelight, albeit in a circuitous manner, simply because this is a big banner producing the film.
But ultimately this movie was just a slickly packaged product, not a real complete movie in the true sense of the term. It was formulaic, and unemotional, and thankfully BR has conveyed that quite accurately in his review. But am surprised there has been no mention of the acting in the movie.
Abhishek was in his element in a comic role, and whatever the demerits of the writing, Sushmita Mukherjee, Kiron Kher and Boman were howlarious!
LikeLike
oops
November 16, 2008
Yeah sm, imo every film produced by Dharma is so influenced by Johar that we tend to forgot that there is a real director with his own identity in the back. Actually, Dharma formula looks very tricky to transcend and none of these directors ( Advani and others) really made their own film under the Dharma flag. They were all outshined by the producer and his vision.
Can’t say much on the film and the review right now , i have to watch it first.
Last point : first compliment for SRK since years here lol. It’s true, his jodi with Saif in Kal Ho na Ho was awesome (i want a second film with both !!).
LikeLike
Jabberwock
November 16, 2008
It’s unfortunate that you caved into the pressure of the anti-Abhishek Bachchan brigade. And wrote this negative review to appease them and show your street cred.
Hahahahahahahaha! Baradwaj, you just can’t win. You’ll never win.
Also, “good riddens to this site”?! What on earth are “riddens”? And are they always good or are some of them bad as well? Star rating please!
LikeLike
Peyton
November 16, 2008
I loved Dostana. The gay aspect was not real and only used for jokes. The real aspect of the movie was friendship. I thought the movie was a funny lark and was entertained.
LikeLike
brangan
November 16, 2008
sm: I agree completely. When I wrote the Rock On review, I alluded to Farhan Akhtar’s sensibility towards the end, when it was Abhishek Kapoor who made the movie. I guess when the “scent” of the sensibility is so strong, we refer directly to the source? I’m not saying that’s right – just that maybe that’s why it is so.
Footydoc: “along with the off-the-wall energy of the actors” — not nearly enough? 🙂
LikeLike
E Pradeep
November 16, 2008
Watched “Dasvidaniya” today and felt the same emotions. Agree that the sanyasi and friends’ wife angle was a bit overdone. I liked the Russian girlfriend angle too – was a short, no strings atatched interlude. The ending was good and they managed to avoid falling into melodrama which was quite possibly for such a movie.
At the ticket counter, the guy said that there were tickets available for Dostana but when I refused saying I was not interested, he felt pretty odd; it’s the pro-Abhishek Bachan brigade at work:)
LikeLike
oops
November 16, 2008
To add to what i said about the banner. The biggest problem with indian cinema is probably “ego”. Who’s number one, who’s the biggest, who’s better. In the relation between a big production house like Dharma and a director, nothing matter except the image of the house and his reputation. To be a real author, you have to create your own production house and create a style that will be your label. Only UTV does not work like that and allow themself to be creative.
Others are still stiff in their own universe, and when it comes to do something different they fail. Yashraj have the same problem. In Dharma, all the movies look the same. In my opinion, these companies are taking a wrong path and will struggle more and more in the future.
LikeLike
Amrita
November 17, 2008
Dostana is the kind of movie that you laugh along with for a fairly long time but at the end of it, you want to go take a hot shower because you’ve had a chance to think about it.
The best part about Dostana is that it’s a pretty good look at the casual homophobia of the Indian male – esp that hilarious We Met In Venice bit. But I think that’s some subtext that’s destined to pass over the heads of most people who saw it.
And the reason it falls so flat is because the central characters are horrible people. The last third of the movie, where they’re screwing around with that poor kid just made me want to kick them repeatedly in the nuts. I can’t believe a Dharam-ka-puttar let them walk away on their own two feet after they pulled that shit. However, the kiss was probably a worse punishment for them.
And what a relief it was to see Priyanka so chilled out. My favorite thing about her character was her total willingness to pimp the boys out when she thought it would help her career. Made her a cut above the seedhi saadhi heroine there.
LikeLike
Lakshmi
November 17, 2008
Dostana is such a dreadful film – there was eight of us who’d gone for the last show at 10 pm and through out the second half of the film, someone or the other kept groaning in sheer irritation… the homosexual representation was appalling – all stereotypes unleashed to death – simply TOO much of skinshow… the list of issues is long.
Simply put, an utter waste of good looks, great locales, awesome apartment and some good actors…
LikeLike
Anand
November 17, 2008
BR: The scent in Dostana is clearly not that of KJ.Thats why it is disappointing. How I wish they brought back Boman Irani and Kirron Kher into the screenplay in the second half – Had the second half been written by Crazy Mohan, it would have been the comedy of the decade(in Hindi)!
LikeLike
Anand
November 17, 2008
And for me the first half worked big time. I don’t think this movie needs to be taken seriously..so I did not find anything offensive at all. In fact the best scene of the film was when Priyanka suspects both AB and JA to have fallen for Bobby!
LikeLike
Ramesh
November 17, 2008
BR : So going the Satyajit Ray way are we 🙂
LikeLike
karthik
November 17, 2008
Rangan….How about Vaaranam ??
LikeLike
vivek
November 17, 2008
Why so serious? It’s a comedy, not a sociopolitical documentary. The way some guys have responded seems extremely strange as the movie was never meant to be a sensitive portrayal of anything! Go watch ‘My brother Nikhil’ if you want sensitivity.
Watch dostana for priyanka chopra and some super laugh out moments (interspersed with bland flat moments of course).
Also AB’s self depreciating humor hit home fairly well. Reminded me of ajith referring to his ‘thoppai’in aegan. Not bad for heroes.
Also this is about the 10th Hindi movie I have watched that doesn’t have a ‘fight sequence’. Surely that’s a big step forward. Wish our tam heroes would learn
LikeLike
Footydoc
November 18, 2008
Looking forward to the Vaaranam Aayiram review. Managed to watch the premiere show in London (a first for any movie for me) and have been quite disappointed with the many reviews I have read. None match your erudition and insight, though I might disagree with some of your opinions often.
Hope to see your take on the film soon.
LikeLike
Aditi
November 18, 2008
Any hope of a review for Slumdog Millionaire?
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
November 18, 2008
Dostana is a bad film, but every other film is bad, so no big deal. But what is alarming is its subtle encouragement of homosexuality. In recent times, Karan Johar has been doing his best to undermine Indian culture, corrupt the society and destroy its moral fabric.’Kabhi Alvida..’ glorified infidelity and now this. What’s wrong with this guy? Wish this movie flops.
LikeLike
brangan
November 18, 2008
Footydoc: Thank you. But let me warn you to be prepared to disagree again. For I quite liked the film 🙂
LikeLike
Deepauk M
November 18, 2008
You liked VaraNam Ayiram? This island of dislike I am sitting on is getting lonely 🙂 . For some reason I couldn’t get over what I felt was poor writing. But if you are doing a take on it I’ll hold my thoughts.
LikeLike
brangan
November 18, 2008
And I thought *I* was the one sitting on an island of “like” 🙂 Almost everyone I’ve spoken to is in disagreement.
LikeLike
Deepauk M
November 18, 2008
Well then I guess someone ought to tell John Donne that there are 2 men on islands here and that he was dead wrong 🙂 . I guess my island seems lonely because of the intensity of the dislike – possibly because I expected more from Gautham.
LikeLike
Footydoc
November 18, 2008
I really liked Vaaranam Ayiram as well, particularly some of the acting and the scripting, and of course the music. Perhaps because I am not a diehard ‘fan’ of Tamil movies and their various ‘stars’, and only watch what I can since moving abroad. And I realise that I am in a minority, judging from the feedback, where expectations from the Gowtham Manon-Surya combine seem to have been belied.
But like Deepak, I shall hold my thoughts till I read yours.
Just curious – I believe that the movie was edited quite a bit for later shows as the weekend progressed, and I wonder whether that has made any impact on the product and the viewership.
LikeLike
Anand
November 18, 2008
BR: I loved it. Let me also hold my thoughts..though my hands are watering 🙂
LikeLike
Anonymous
November 18, 2008
Are you reviewing Vaaranam? It wasn’t till a coupla hours after watchin the movie, did I finally feel the movie sinkin in. I liked it! and now wouldnt mind watchin it again.
LikeLike
brangan
November 18, 2008
Aditi: The film isn’t out here.
Anonymous: Not a comprehensive review, but a few scattered thoughts — as is the case with my Between Reviews pieces.
LikeLike
Dev
November 19, 2008
Mr. Raj Balakrishnan,
It’s really sad that people like you want to hold societies in their stifling iron grip and some even brutally kill those who disagree with them.I hereby label you the gatekeeper of hell.
LikeLike
raj
November 19, 2008
deepak,
maybe varanam aayiram was *looking* and *feeling* like a indhi padam 🙂
LikeLike
SheWhoMustNotBeNamed
November 19, 2008
Raj, am guessing “Tamizh Pechu Engal Moochu” is your fav. show on tv :))
LikeLike
Deepauk M
November 20, 2008
Raj: Actually no. It was the structure that I have an issue with. Well that and the possibilities of what might have been.
Also to clarify, I am not anti-Indhi padam. In fact, if pressed, I would have to agree that the creative fires burn far brighter in Mumbai than they do in Chennai, for now.
LikeLike
Deepauk M
November 20, 2008
Also, Raj I put up the clarification because it seems like your statement presupposes that there exists a singular look/feel for indhi padams 🙂 avaLO thaan.
LikeLike
raj
November 20, 2008
SWMNBN, no. I agree you dont have evidence beyond my distaste for *certain* type of indhi movies in this space but I can speak 5 Indian languages, including Hindi and I consider myself far more Indian than the typical “hindi is natl lang so despite being tamil I learnt it see how nationalistic I am and see how chauvinistic other tamils are” types, if you see what I mean. In addition, I can understand a couple of more languages reasonably well.
Deepauk, again misunderstanding. One, my comment was in jest minus the smilies, which with my writing skills was too much of a risk to take, I agree. Two, even if Hindi movies were the benhcmark, Tamil movies looking and feeling like indhi movies is not what we want. Three, the comparisons to Lakshya made sense, though only part of the movie. Four, I think an urban upper middle classs sensibility movie in Tamil is very rare in these days of post-MR – even C00028 has a middle-class sensibility – while that is staple in Hindi. Hence my comment. Obviously, I dont mean to bucket Kya Kool Hai hum and Omkara together.
Five, it is easy to stereotype oneself if one pursued one’s pet peeve.(that’s for myself)
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
November 20, 2008
“Also to clarify, I am not anti-Indhi padam. In fact, if pressed, I would have to agree that the creative fires burn far brighter in Mumbai than they do in Chennai, for now.”
this statement was probably more true in 2001-2005 timeframe. Last few years tamil movies have improved a lot. the gap is not that big. there are certain type of hindi movies I am totally sick off – like the glossy yash raj movies.
LikeLike
oops
November 20, 2008
I finally saw Dostana. Verdict : funny, really funny sometimes but lacked a little bit of subtility. If i was John Abraham, i would’ve considered his role as an insult to my intelligence. But more you see him play, more you see understand that he was not comfortable as Abhi with the subject. With more dialogues from him, the movie could’ve been a real disaster. Abraham is the first “man eyecandy” in indian cinema in a movie about homosexuality ! And THAT was clever if it was done in purpose, ’cause no one can guess by the promo that Priyanka is not the one who’s playing this role for once ! And he’s HOT !! the guy is walking around half naked all the time… imo as a girl it was perfect 🙂 Abhi was perfect too, his comic timing was really good, as was Priyanka (charming and natural). I don’t know if i could leave the HOTness of John or the WITTYness of Abhi for a bland Deol… but he was okay.
Too many cliche about gay people, and a very crude sense of humour. But hey, indian cinema is still very shy compared to what american or european can make. It’s not 4 everybody, just for a very relaxed youth who wants a good saturday night laugh. 🙂
LikeLike
oops
November 20, 2008
My only grudge about Dostana : making a constant homage for his own film is lame. Personal message for Johar and Kanye West !!
LikeLike
nirmal
November 20, 2008
i dint catch dasvidaniya., and so i am curious about your using the word’ bucket list’ in your review.. was it actually a term used in the movie or was it a silent nod from your part to the morgan freeman,jack nicholson movie ‘ the bucket list’ with almost exactly the same story line.? i had loved that movie…
LikeLike
brangan
November 20, 2008
nirmal: It was a silent nod.
LikeLike
oops
November 21, 2008
hum hum i remark that now Rangan only talk to a limited group of people and others are left out. I don’t why, not a critic from my side, just a thought.
I’m out 😉
LikeLike
brangan
November 21, 2008
oops: It’s not that at all 🙂 He asked a question. I answered. That was all.
LikeLike
ML
November 21, 2008
oops, if it makes you feel any better. I love reading your comments here.
I’m no Rangan so it’ll have to do. 😉
LikeLike
brangan
November 21, 2008
oops, if it makes you feel any better, I love reading your comments too. And I *am* Rangan 😉
LikeLike
oops
November 21, 2008
ok i did not want to sound like a dog begging for attention lol but it’s just that the atmosphere here has changed since a few weeks so …
Back to the topic : everyone is so severe about Dostana. It’s just joke. Of course, crude humor can’t be for everyone…
LikeLike
Elizabeth
November 26, 2008
Can I join the “island of like” for Vaaranam Aayiram? I wasn’t expecting to like it since I find most films that span several decades of a person’s life to be exhausting, but shockingly, I found myself rather enjoying VA.
I thought the acting was good all around and that was probably what made it work for me. The transformation of Surya from college student to older man and then teenager to adult was surprisingly believable, though poor Simran was the victim of an awful make up job.
I kept thinking of Bachna Ae Haseeno where Ranbir Kapoor looked exactly the same through the entire film.
Also, loved the music.
Was it flawless? Of course not, but I liked it.
LikeLike