SCENES FROM A CARNAGE
An impressively understated examination of lives impacted by communal riots. Plus, a woefully undercooked romantic comedy.
MAR 22, 2009 – A LITTLE AFTER THE RIOTS in Gujarat that wiped out multitudes of Muslims, Sanjay (Paresh Rawal) is seated at the dining table, viewing his television set with unconcealed contempt. The images that flicker on screen are, by now, distressingly familiar to us – not just from that specific instance of tragedy, but also subsequent ones. The destitute and the displaced form the wailing backdrop of a proscenium as a television journalist occupies centrestage, a one-woman Greek chorus lamenting the senselessness of these horrors – but Sanjay doesn’t buy any of this. He smirks that had a similar pogrom been unleashed against the Hindu majority, no one would be speaking up about it, and because it’s a minority group that’s bearing the brunt, the liberal world is bristling with outrage.
It’s a testament to the liberal beliefs of first-time director Nandita Das that – with this scene, and with this statement – she doesn’t flinch from indicting herself. Firaaq – “a work of fiction, based on a thousand true stories” – opens with stomach-churning visuals of the Muslim dead being deposited in a mass grave, and much later, we witness a Hindu mercilessly cracking open the skull of a hapless Muslim, who’s already winded from outrunning a relentless cop on his trail. The character most blatantly proffered for our sympathies is an adorably wide-eyed Muslim child (Mohsin, played by Mohammad Samad), who doesn’t realise he’s been orphaned in the riots. We see Hindu cops callously kicking over water drums filled to the brim by Muslims in order to douse the fires they fear will be set off by torch-bearing mobs.
We sense the apprehension in an impoverished Muslim mother who’s afraid to part with her newborn even while relieving herself, and the upper classes, too, are running scared – Sameer (Sanjay Suri) often takes advantage of the fact that, with his name, he could easily pass for Hindu. A spoilt, rich Hindu bride whines that these bloody riots have put a damper on her wedding celebrations, clearly unmindful that there are people dying around her. When a Muslim husband slaps his wife, it appears to be the simple circumstance of a man cracking under the pressure of persecution, but a corresponding event, in a Hindu household, is viewed as vile as the violence on the streets. As agenda-driven films go, it couldn’t be clearer whose side – for lack of a more politically correct term – Das is on, or at least, whose stories she’s attempting to sell.
And yet, Firaaq is no bleeding-heart lefty screed. It doesn’t seek to instill shame in us, it doesn’t attempt to dispense insulting band-aid solutions for a seriously sick society – it just wants to be. It just wants to observe cross-sections of the populace directly (and sometimes indirectly) affected by the carnage. Whatever Das feels about it all is amply evident in what she chooses to show us – but never in how she shows us these things. The outrage she felt (and perhaps still feels) roils under a surface of preternaturally eerie calm that never breaks, so we are aware of being talked to but never lectured at. That’s what so refreshing about Firaaq, especially for those of us who do not take kindly at all to movies that wag their fingers at us, striving to send us home with ennobling halos behind our gravely nodding heads.
Firaaq is crafted in what’s quickly turning out to be Bollywood’s signature style of 2009 – a series of finely wrought vignettes brought to life by an astounding cast of character actors. (Naseeruddin Shah, Paresh Rawal, Raghuveer Yadav, Deepti Naval, Shahana Goswami, Tisca Chopra, Amruta Subhash – now there’s a case for instituting an ensemble award category.) These parallel story threads revolve around Hindu-Muslim girlfriends, or a Hindu-Muslim married couple, or a doormat Hindu housewife still haunted by memories of the riots – but Das, in a marvellous decision, refuses to weave these strands together into a tense, climactic knot. There’s a fleeting mention that further trouble may be brewing, and we grip our armrests in anticipation of an explosive showdown that unites the disparate people and pieces of information thus far, especially with the subplot about the acquisition of a revolver by a group of vengeful Muslims.
But Das isn’t after any sort of overarching big picture. She’s content to create a series of albums consisting of individual snapshots that vanish from view as soon as the page is turned, residing only in our memories any further. (Among my favourite snapshots are those of Naseeruddin Shah – who plays an old-world musician untouched by the cataclysms of the present-day, much like the art-patron zamindar in Ray’s Jalsaghar – gently wiping the surface of a gramophone record with the flap of his kurta, and, elsewhere, Mohsin delighting in a colourful kite, distracted for just an instant by the business of being a child once again.) Perhaps the graph of some of these incidents could have benefited from a better trajectory, a little more detailing that would have made the epiphanies more hard-won, but this realisation only reaffirms – in an election year, no less – that there are never any easy solutions.
PARVATI BALAGOPALAN’S FIRST FEATURE, Rules: Pyaar Ka Superhit Formula, was a winning little comedy that worked primarily because of the latter qualifier. It was a small film, one of modest ambitions, an old-fashioned Cinderella story gussied up with modern-day frills like a gay subplot (which wasn’t so ubiquitous back in 2003) and a fairy godmother in the form of a tart-tongued grandmother. The director, subsequently, has turned ambitious. She’s still working within the confines of romantic comedy, but this time around, the issue of sexuality is no longer in the fringes. Pinu Patel (Vinay Pathak) is worried that he might be gay. (Perhaps it has to do with the unfortunate fact that his given name sounds like a mischievous abbreviation of a certain sexual organ?)
He’s a waffly wallflower under pressure to marry a nice girl from back home. (He’s settled in London, where he runs a restaurant named… Gaylord.) Fanning his flames of confusion are employees Renu (Gul Panag) and Kamlesh (Anuj Chaudhary), whose relationships with Pinu defy convenient slotting into the categories of romance and bromance. There’s possibly a laugh riot lurking in here somewhere, but Straight plays as if a chef assembled all the right ingredients, tossed them into a pot, and forgot to turn the stove on. Somewhere through the undercooked proceedings, there’s even a feeble message of tolerance, courtesy Shakespeare. (“If you prick us, do we not bleed?” a character declaims, only partly in jest, equating anti-Semitism and homophobia.) Someday, the history books will recall Straight as the film that showcased Bollywood’s first on-screen erection, but it’s otherwise limp as a day-old noodle.
Copyright ©2009 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
brangan
March 21, 2009
Here’s a mini review of Barah Aana, which I caught at IFFI.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 21, 2009
The problem with the pseudo-secular, pseudo-intellectual, leftist, dumb, crap filmakers like Nandita Das is that while they will keep going on about Gujarat for hundreds of years, they wouldn’t, for a moment, bother to look at the 300,000 odd Kashmiri Hindus driven out of their homes and living as refugees in their own country. Nandita Das is the most overated actor in history; sure she is as bad as a filmaker. I have no ill feelings towards any community, but dumb, mediocre filmakers like Nandita Das should get their facts correct.
LikeLike
scribina
March 21, 2009
raj, have u watched the film?
LikeLike
ashwe
March 21, 2009
Yeah! One should stick to making films like ‘Drona’ 😉
Since muslims suffered more in this riot (nationally and Internationally accepted fact) I’m not surprised that it occupies Nandita’s thoughts.
If she chose to show a certain minority should that be swept away in accusations of this or that belief rather than the tragedy?
If no one has attempted in making a film on the Kashmir situation of hindus why should that take away from this film?
Sorry, but these remarks are not very intelligent.
I hope this kind of view and the one expressed by RB will be that of a very very microscopic minority.
But Modi supporters might get loud and make it look like the majority view!!
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 22, 2009
Scribina, I haven’t watched it nor do I intend to! I don’t want my money to flow into Nandita Das’s pockets.
LikeLike
Virginia
March 22, 2009
So happy to have your thoughts to think about, especially when I’ve seen the movie and few other people here have – I saw Firaaq at a film festival in New York.
Nandita Das told us she’d wanted to make a movie about the aftereffects of violence, without making a violent movie. I thought she laid a foundation in the opening grave-diggers’ scene, wgere in my memory Naseeruddin says very sadly something like, what does it matter if these bodies are Muslim or Hindu? they have been killed.
[Note I only get dialogue through subtitles.]
One place I had a different read on the movie than you did was this, I thought Nandita Das drew a pretty thick straight line (but artfully) between ALL violence toward women and all societal/brutal violence – I don’t remember noting a distinction between Muslim man hitting and Hindu man hitting/brutalizing.
But again – I am intimate with neither the language nor the Indian viewer’s experience-based context for viewing.
And probably less inured to domestic hitting in movies too.
LikeLike
Anand
March 22, 2009
Raj Balakrishnan: Disappointed with the tone of your comment.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 22, 2009
Anand, I am disappointed that people like you are being swayed by the arguments of the pseudo-secular pseudo-liberals. Are you aware that the greatest genocide in history was committed by the mughals not Nazi Germany; according to historians millions of Hindus were massacred by the mughals. If you say this out aloud, you will be branded as communal in modern India. It is this mentality which makes the media go blind on the atrocities committed on the Hindus by minority fanatics while at the same time blowing up minor incidents such as the Mangalore pub one.
LikeLike
Venkatesh
March 22, 2009
Ah, the i shall spout cause i can species.
“Scribina, I haven’t watched it nor do I intend to!”
Let me understand this Mr. Balakrishnan – you have decided to comment without actually seeing the film, your comment has nothing to do with the contents of this column, it doesn’t have anything to do with Cinema or the arts or even the traditional(for this column) ARR vs. IR fights.
So why exactly did you decide to comment here , i am sure there are numerous “i hate pseudo-secular pseudo-liberals (especially Nandita Das) forums”.
Do take your garbage elsewhere dear sir.
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
March 22, 2009
Raj – Are you the same person who generally writes against bollywood 🙂
I may disagree with you on that, but on this I am 100% with you.
LikeLike
brangan
March 22, 2009
Venkatesh: I don’t think there’s ever been a “fight” here, about ARR or IR or whoever else. Strong opinions, yes, but nowhere do I recall a fight 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
March 22, 2009
A letter to the paper…
Dear Sir
I am regularly reading your reviews and you are doing a decent job. Congrats. But as a seasoned journalist, you must have raised the following questions.
1.How come this film is released just prior to the election in the same way PARZANIA was released prior to Gujarat assembly elections?
2.Who killed 250 hindus during the Gujarat riots?
3.Why there is no mention of the burning of 55 innocent women and children by the good natured muslim brethren?
4.Why there is no mention of 20000 hindu refugees in various camps in Gujarat?
You must have wondered aloud as to why no producer has taken a film on the following themes:
1. Massacre and ethnic-cleansing of hindus in kashmir, by the peace loving kashmiri muslims.
2.Refusal of a piece of land for hindu pilgrimage in Amarnath?
3.Genocide of hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh.
4.A film titled BURNING TRAIN – showing the gruesome details of innocent women and children burnt alive in Godhra carnage.
5.Massacre of 4000 sikhs in 1984, by the secular congress goondas
As expected, the secular media, has giv en very good rating for the film and you are no exception – 4 stars. Long live Indian secularism.
with best wishes,
LikeLike
DesktopFixture
March 22, 2009
Mr. Raj Balakrishnan,
The Mughals and/or their preceding foreign conquerors may have committed more atrocities than Nazi Germany. Therefore it was appalling to see similar atrocities being committed by Hindu mobs against Muslims in 2002. You can’t object to talking about one injustice and murderous crime because others haven’t been talked about. That is unfair to the innocent victims.
LikeLike
Shalini
March 22, 2009
I hope I can make an observation here without getting blown up in the minefield of labels.:-)
Whatever the reasons, it does seem that Hindi cinema has confined itself to providing just one perspective on communal relations in India. From Dharmputra in the 60s to Mr. & Mrs. Iyer/Parzania in this decade, the instigator/engineer of religious violence is always shown to be an intolerant Hindu. Offhand, I can’t think of an instance in Hindi films where the relgious intolerance point was made by showing a non-Hindu as the intolerant party…?
This isn’t to say that movies like Firaaq shouldn’t be made or aren’t necessary – they absolutely are. It’s just that I find the lack of perspectives presented puzzling and yes – disturbing. I think we’re all better off the more angles we are provided on any given issue.
LikeLike
raj
March 22, 2009
Tambidude, sorry to disappoint you but that’s not me 🙂
( BR – Thanks, I was about to say that there haven’t bee arr-ir fights here. I vent against bollywood yes but with rahman-raja, there have just been analyses. Of course, I can understand if diehards of either think that analyses of merits of the other one is against their idol
LikeLike
raj
March 22, 2009
Well,raj b,last year, there was wednesday hich ca be construed as a right wingy.
If you want to hear about atrocities by minority community,pls watch telugu cinema, wo have been rather unabashedly anti-muslim in the last several years. Stuff passes off there which will cause riots and ralies elsewhere
Note;they don’t make nuanced critiques on kashmir pograms though. Just general invective.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 22, 2009
Completely agree with the views expressed in the letter to the paper
Tambi Dude, thanks. I am not the one who writes against Bollywood.
Venkatesh, remove your blinkers. Do not allow yourself to be brainwashed by the pseudo seculars.
LikeLike
brangan
March 22, 2009
Shalini: Roja, for one, had a Muslim “instigator of violence,” and Sarfarosh too.
LikeLike
Chaitanya
March 22, 2009
Roja and Sarfarosh had people from outside the border as the ‘instigators of violence’. It is ‘safe’ to show them as the bad guys, isn’t it?
LikeLike
brangan
March 22, 2009
In the interim, here’s something for QT fans 🙂
LikeLike
Amrita
March 23, 2009
So… any thoughts on the film?
LikeLike
Nikhila
March 23, 2009
Shalini, here’s a short off-the head list of movies with muslims as the instigators of violence.
Sarfarosh, Maa Tujhe Salam, Pukar, Gadar, Fiza, Mission Kashmir, Border, LOC, Faana…
LikeLike
brangan
March 23, 2009
Amrita: Which film are you referring to?
LikeLike
raj
March 23, 2009
This is an interesting discussion.
Now, hy don’t people immediately think of maa tujhe salaam or gadar when taking about imbalance in bollywod potrayal of communalism?
Maybe what people are looking for an equivalent of firaaq? That is, the sunny deol stuff is so obvously msala and caricature for people looking for nuanced critique of the other community which would be believale?
LikeLike
raj
March 23, 2009
Continuing…
One of the disturbing features of khadgam, by krishna vamsi, remade as insaan, was how the movie got away with subtle hinting that all communal propblems stem from muslim attitude. It had the token patriotic muslim,yes, played with gutso by prakash raj and caricatured by the limited akshay kumar in hindi but its tone was unmistakable. What made me uncomfortable, I realise was that this wasn’t a run of the mill sunny deol type movie. It had claims to be realistic portrayal of old city. It had believeable characters, supplememnted by good performances, especially by srikanth and prakash. the fact that thje characters were believable, and that the movie hqd a clear one sided viewpoint is what caused discomfort.
Now people who watched insaan may think of this as too much credit for another sunny deol type movie.that is another story really – it happened with anthapuram, too. The talented krishna vamsi made engaging telugu films well rooted in their milieu only to see the bollywood stars managing to perform poorly and destroy the movie in hindi. That is another story anyway.
Thing is believable movies if theytake only one side of the view, do tend to disturb the supporters of the other POV
LikeLike
Arijit
March 23, 2009
raj,
i would love if you criticize all forms of violence against man, woman and child committed anywhere on this planet…however, to not criticize a form of violence because of the fact that possibly greater atrocities have been committed in the past is no sane logic…it is this apathetic attitude of the India masses have we allowed communal parties in this country to misinterpret the very basic tenets of religion and exploit the common people and lead them to commit acts of violence against those whom they would have greeted on any normal occassion…wake up dude!
LikeLike
Arijit
March 23, 2009
the kill bill abridged version was amazing…where did you get it? kill bill 1 & 2 are one of my most favourite films…any thoughts on his new film?
LikeLike
Muthuvel
March 23, 2009
Brangan, does the theatrical release of ‘Firaaq’ has sub-titles in it?
LikeLike
brangan
March 23, 2009
Muthuvel: Nope. I think the subtitled prints exist only in the foreign markets.
LikeLike
Padawan
March 23, 2009
I read about the QT thing on my way to office this morning…pretty neat! They have also done a similar thing of Forrest Gump. And will you be doing a review or Between Review of Watchmen?
LikeLike
Venkatesh
March 23, 2009
BR/Raj(the other one) , let me re-phrase that line – “even the traditional(for this column) ARR vs. IR fights” = even the traditional(for this column) ARR vs. IR strong opinionated analyses. ..:-)
Be that as it may , the central point remains we come here to read/write on Cinema and the arts in general. Spouting off on the so-called psuedo-secular,pseudo-liberals etc. is hopefully not the aim here., especially when coupled with a resolute aim of not actually wanting to watch the movie in question. The comment and its tone doesn’t bring anything to the discussion.
Raj B: Leave it to me to remove or put on my “blinkers”.
LikeLike
Deepauk M
March 23, 2009
brangan: Thanks for that link. 🙂
It was like watching a (really really) low budget Fatboy Slim Video version of Kill Bill.
LikeLike
Adithya
March 23, 2009
BR: That video was just awesome. I loved that Pai Mei character’s appearance,absolutely hilarious.
And, did you manage to catch In Bruges? I thought it was a superb movie, with really good dialogs and screenplay. It deserved more Oscar nominations and showed Colin Farell could act too! I later found he did win a Golden Globe.
LikeLike
Shalini
March 23, 2009
Perhaps my question wasn’t very clear, but I wasn’t asking for portrayls of *general* violence by members of minority communities, but for examples of *communal* violence. Violence stemming from religious bigotry. And not instances of Pakistanis or non-Indians engaging in relgious violence but of Indians.
Raj seems to have understood my question – what are the non-Hindu equivalents of a “Dharmputra” or “Parzania”? I haven’t seen all the movies listed, but certainly Roja, Sarfarosh, Fiza, Border, Fanaa, don’t fit that profile.
LikeLike
Amrita
March 23, 2009
Rangan – Oh, I was just asking if anybody had actually seen Firaaq and what they thought about it. 🙂
LikeLike
Rahul
March 24, 2009
Shalini,How about Dev?
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 24, 2009
Shalini, to answer your question, there are none. According to the pseudo seculars, all members of the minority community are peace loving saints. Godhra, Marad, the various bomb blasts have never happened.
LikeLike
raj
March 24, 2009
“Raj seems to have understood my question – what are the non-Hindu equivalents of a “Dharmputra” or “Parzania”?”
Shalini, while I understood your question, I really dont see the need to answer it.
Now, Nandita Das and co. seem to strongly believe in their cause – so they made a movie espousing their cause. Who really stopped anyone from making a movie on religious-bigotry-induced terror acts by the other community? Really, why is Bollywood answerable for that? Whose fault is it that the only movies that document violence by the ‘other community’ are Sunny Deol type ones which lack credibility?
I ask these questions – and only ask since I dont have answers or opinions on this:
1. Does this mean that there is no such thing as a ‘right leaning liberal’. Since there is a term called ‘left leaning liberal’, I assume the polar opposite must exist – only we never ever get to see them.
2. More interestingly, is it that ‘right leaning liberals’ are automatically assumed to be communal and branded so? Is this the angst of Raj B or Shalini? I dont know really since the samples we get from bollywood on the other POV is all Gadar types – who, even as Shalini admits, arent really credible. So, is there a ‘right leaning liberal’ whose movie dealing with a mirror opposite of Firaaq focussing only on the faults of the minority community? Is there such a movie? Such a movie has been unfairly ignored and pushed under the carpet? If that is not the case, what is the problem of Raj B or Shalini? That such a movie or movie maker doesnt exist? If that is their problem, who can be blamed really? Not bollywood surely?
LikeLike
brangan
March 24, 2009
raj: “That such a movie or movie maker doesnt exist? If that is their problem, who can be blamed really?” This is exactly what I just wrote about for my column this week — well, not *exactly* this, but in a way, questioning our expectations from movies.
LikeLike
Upamanyu
March 24, 2009
Thanks for the awesome video. It’s one of the best creative works I’ve ever seen on YouTube.
LikeLike
raj
March 24, 2009
BR, oh thanks, great minds, eh? 😉
(yeah, shameless baseless self-glorification, I know)
LikeLike
Shalini
March 24, 2009
Rahul – Yes! “Dev” is an example. Thanks. And I haven’t seen it, but possibly “Hey Ram” also?
To BR, Raj, et. al, who’re questioning why I’m questioning:-), first my queries are curiosity, not “angst” driven. The cinematic choices that a culture/society makes are of sociological interest to me. The kind of movies and issues they are willing to explore in their movies, say something about what filmmakers consider important. One natural question is whether the priorities/thinking of filmmakers are in-sync with the society they serve. And what does it reveal about the relationship between cinema-society if films are or aren’t reflective of their audience.
These aren’t so much questions about what films *should* or shouldn’t be, but what they *are* – and what that means. Which is why I find all these “well, who’s to blame and who’s stopping XYZ from making ABC movie” reactions childishly simplistic and unthinking. And frankly BR, I’m disappointed to see you as a part of this intellectually incurious brigade.:-(
One final comment, there is a movie on Kashmir from the Kashmiri Pandit POV – a 2007 release called “Sheen”. I of course haven’t seen it.:-)
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 24, 2009
Raj, to answer your question – ‘Sheen’ – have not seen it – dealt with the problems of the Kashmiri Hindus – received absolutely no coverage in the pseudo secular media.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
March 24, 2009
In continuation of my previous comment, I don’t think that Sheen was even anti-muslim. The fact that it highlighted the problems of the Hindus was enough for it to be boycotted by the pseudo seculars
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
March 24, 2009
Long time back in RAMLI newsgroup I had a debate with Arun Simha about viewing a film with detachment from the content. Meaning if a film is made about Jinnah or Hitler I should not let the feelings about the person come in the way in enjoying the movie (assuming it is well made). Looks like I was wrong.
LikeLike
s
March 25, 2009
I have always wondered about what tambi dude says above. Even though on a text book level, I would agree to that one should see movies with the detachment and just appreciate the movie for what it is.
When it comes to reality, it is quite different. I watch movies as an experience. If something works, it works.
But I do primarily react to what is being portrayed on the screen and what I end up feeling. As a viewer I dont feel any responsibility towards understanding the maker’s intention. For example, I hate the heroes of Selvaraghavan movies so much that I have never stopped to even look what a good job he has done in portraying them. I never can. I have no interest/fascination for Bala’s heroes(pretty much non-existent in real life).
May be some one who loves movies beyond everything like Baradwaj would be able to appreciate but I dont and dont feel the need to as well.
I am not going to watch a movie like Parzania or this either because the end result might just be that I will end up feeling so under represented. Nothing is going to stop them but the fact that the way majority felt about is getting recorded these days is wonderful. That SDM wasn’t as appreciated in India was fairly well represented outside India.
Same way that Nandita das’s point of view was viewed as one-sided will also hopefully get represented.
Regarding Shalini’s question, I have a lot of hope that filmmakers with balanced view will soon end up making movies on this topic as well. it isnt very far. Not long ago, we couldnt relate to pretty much all the movies that were made. It is no longer the case.So I do think that movies might be made by people outside the walls of one Delhi university(which seems to sending out people as if they were factory-made,all sound the same) who will have a better understanding of the soceity outside the delhi university walls.
But yes, there is a problem of Nandita Das & Rahul Dholakia’s geting a noble tag.
Ps: when I look back, Kamal who normally sounds so arrogant, unconnected to a common man in his interviews did two wonderful movies like Hey Ram and virumandi which showed a great understanding of common man! Hey ram was an eye opener for me as a teenager. Gosh, I hope he stops doing Dasavatharams and starts directing movies again.
LikeLike
s
March 25, 2009
oops, read one of your comments, started wondering, there cant be anything wrong with my expectation that movies such as parzania or this have to represent balanced view of the situation? just like my expectation out of Mangal Pandey has to be historically accurate.
It isnt their responsibility but it isnt my responsibility not to have such expectations.
LikeLike
Nirmal
March 25, 2009
*** digression alert ***
this is for any ARR fans out there. A R Rahman is giving a live concert on may 3rd at kozhikode, kerala as part of an fund raising for an AIDS control program. If the media is right , it will be his only live concert in india for the next five years. Tickets are on sale from Apr 2. No i am not a promotes or anything :-)i am a regular reader of this blog , i am a fan and i happen to live in kozhikode , so came to know of it and decided to share the news. Will be happy to give more info if anyone interested.
LikeLike
Shankar
March 25, 2009
Nirmal, where in Kozhikode is the concert? I hope it’s not at the Corporation stadium…
LikeLike
Nirmal
March 26, 2009
Sorry shankar , it is at the corporation stadium. They wanted max audience i guess , and corp stadium can hold 70k.
But why exactly where you hoping so.? Sports stadiums may not be the best places for concerts i agree. but you have any concert experience there.? The only other concert since stadium was renewed that i can rem is a shaan concert and happened to miss it. And i think they will rewamp the whole place if there are glaring shortcomings..
also in view of recent discussions about rahman and SEL here i cant show any partiality:-) There is also a shankar mahadevan concert in calicut on mar 27 at national institute of technology calicut..
LikeLike
ashwe
March 26, 2009
The hindus shouldn’t have voted Modi back to power, in protest against the atrocities.
LikeLike
Vivek
March 26, 2009
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3974179.stm
Probably why the other side is Under represented. If I remember correctly the director of Sheen also faced death threats. If I were a Bollywood director, regardless of my secularism/pseudo secularism, I would be infinitely scared of messing with the other side. Look what happened when some Danish dude drew some cartoons!
LikeLike
Venkatesh
March 26, 2009
Hmm. , Vivek you have raised a good point.
Is it simply that people are too afraid to represent the other-side., i remember Salman Rushdie recanting as well during the Satanic Verses controversy.
Mind you, that doesn’t condone mud-slinging or name-calling towards the makers of this-side i.e. people making Parzania, Firaaq et all.
LikeLike
brangan
March 26, 2009
I think it may also be the simple fact that a lot of liberals think alike, and when they make movies, they end up making these *types* of films. After all, the liberal thought is always going to lean towards injustices to the “little man.”
LikeLike
chhote saab
March 26, 2009
Badesaab – “the liberal thought is always going to lean towards injustices to the “little man.” But ideally it should lean towards injustices to the little man irrespective of religion. I think it is because of the minority factor – just like movies about racism against blacks/colored people attracts more attention in USA and western world in general. Almost like because they are in minority they need to be spoken for – which may or may not be true.
LikeLike
brangan
March 26, 2009
Of course, chhote. That’s the ideal scanario. But I’m just speculating *why* it might be so.
LikeLike
The Normal Guy
March 28, 2009
brangan : Choose and Compare. Mumbai Meri Jaan and Firaaq. Both were good films. But, I felt like watching Mumbai Meri Jaan twice , not Firaaq. And, it has nothing to do with the audience unrest during Firaaq.
Even , Mumbai Meri jaan took its own sweet time to unfold and gave its characters time to breathe. There was lot of funnyness in Mumbai Meri Jaan which I enjoyed.
Whats ur take on this, if you think they are comparable that is.
LikeLike
brangan
March 28, 2009
The Normal Guy: I’d go with Firaaq. Sure, maybe the entertainment elements of MMJ make it easier to watch, but as a film, Firaaq is leagues ahead.
LikeLike
arun verma
March 31, 2009
Firaaq leagues ahead of MMJ/A wednesday/Aamir??? Looks like we watched different films.. Firaaq is just a wannabe ensemble CRASH-like piece.. with a very uncinematic core.. Parzania was better too! IMHO!
LikeLike
Sev
September 3, 2013
Why are these riots viewed in isolation? I’d love a film in which these riots and the hindu-centric violence that preceded it were strung together to indicate a destructive vicious circle of violence unleashed in a country with political turmoil and deep chasms between the rich and the poor making violence cheap and accessible.
LikeLike