CREATING A CRITIC
In which our film critic says “thank you” to Doordarshan for shaping his cinematic sensibilities.
OCT 11, 2009 – WITH SO MANY RHEUMY REMEMBRANCES being directed towards Doordarshan on its completion of 50 years, I felt compelled to contribute my two-and-a-half bits of nostalgia. But this isn’t about oh-those-were-the-days – Oru Manidhanin Kadhai and Malgudi Days and Hum Log and Buniyaad and those no-nonsense Lalitaji ads between The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and the BBC Shakespeare adaptations that aired on weekends. For all their indisputable merits, I think many of us watched Hum Log and Buniyaad because there was nothing else to watch at the time. I do not have the stomach, any longer, for drawn-out dramas spanning generations. A lot of this is just nostalgia – we like to sentimentalise the past and we like to scorn the present. (Though it’s mostly our past that we’re passionate and protective about – our parents’ past, for instance, we have little hesitation in dismissing with derision.)
What I’d like to acknowledge is that Doordarshan has shaped me (in terms of my profession as a film critic) in ways I cannot begin to be grateful for, primarily through programming that was equally assimilative of the past and the present. (I do not know if any of this was intentional, this respect for the past alongside the recognition of the present – quite frankly, a lot of what Doordarshan did, and still does, appears frustratingly haphazard – but it was there all the same.) Therefore, I tried to remember all the programmes that I felt helped define me as I go about my duties today, and I came up with two overarching categories – the feature films (along with the occasional documentary), and the shows built around feature films (involving songs and personalities and film-based themes in general).
The former consisted of the weekly Hindi film on Saturday evening, the weekly Tamil film on Sunday evening, the films broadcast during the announcement of election results, the late-night art-house and foreign films, and the subtitled regional films on Sunday afternoons. Even within the span of a week, therefore, there was an interesting mix of films that simultaneously inured me to the melodramatic traditions of our cinema and indoctrinated me in the moderations of their cinema. This early exposure helps me put in context any kind of film today, which is not the case with the subsequent generation born into cable-TV households – when the slick, clickety-clack rhythms of Moonlighting and The Wonder Years began to whittle away at the more dated aspects of our storytelling. (With this generation, you can sense a general contempt for older Indian cinema, and this is the first of the generations that’s fully embraced the multiplex filmmaking today).
But when you’ve religiously absorbed Paasamalar and Ganga and Dharam-Veer and Ek Mahal Ho Sapnon Ka, you know where Pokkiri or Wanted is coming from, you’re aware of exactly which sentimental traditions are being invoked in Thavamai Thavamirundhu or Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, and you easily make the leap from Waqt to Kabhie Khushi Kabhie Gham. You take these films seriously (at least to analyse them, even if you don’t buy into them completely) – and you don’t approach them with the check-that-out cynicism of subsequent generations. Even if I laugh at these films, the rolling of the eyes is compassionate, not cruel. And how could it be otherwise – as the rhythms of these older films, these traditional Indian films, are (thanks to Doordarshan) encoded in my DNA? (That’s possibly why I keep hearing that my reviews of such films aren’t dismissive enough.)
If I’d had more options, maybe I’d have chosen channels that offered brighter blandishments – but much like we speak of single-screen audiences now, I’m the product of a single-channel environment. It was precisely this lack of options that shaped my generation. We watched what was available, not what was attractive, and in retrospect, this is why we’re so accepting of moviemaking from everywhere – from the past, from the present, from here, from over there. The entire oeuvre of Hindi parallel cinema, for instance, was telecast on Doordarshan, and I never thought of these as slow or arty – they were just films to be seen. (Of course, you need to have been a movie buff to begin with. I can name several friends who were not into Indian films, and who’d, today, rather jump off a cliff than subject themselves to Thavamai Thavamirundhu or Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi.)
The other category of programmes that influenced me comprised of song compilations like Oliyum Oliyum and Chitrahaar and Chitramala (again, a valuable exposure to old as well as new), old-timer reminiscences like Malarum Ninaivugal and Phool Khile Hain Gulshan Gulshan, and novelties like Show Theme (yes, the one brought to you by Limca and Pond’s) that concatenated thematically related film clips. There’s still the odd new channel that showcases older songs and films, but with all the alternatives available, I doubt there’ll be a new generation that tunes in. Doordarshan may be dismissed as dated, but look past the tatty signage and the other outwardly downmarket aspects and you’ll see that DD Podhigai does have some of the best cinema programming, as also DD National (which, Sunday afternoons, is home to theme-based retrospectives of older films). But forget the present for a moment – this, DD, is simply a thank-you for the past.
Copyright ©2009 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Arif Attar
October 10, 2009
I have always asked myself why I don’t blog more often. I have so much to say. But then I come to your page and I see what’s in my mind written down here in ways that I can never match up to.
Doordarshan shaped all of us. And it’s nothing to do with nostalgia when I say that the entertainment programmes were way better in those days. I can never imagine any of the TV channels we have today commissioning a series like, say. the Malgudi Days. They say competition is good for the consumer. Look what it has done to TV entertainment.
Even Aaj Tak was different fish altogether when it was a 30-minute slot on DD.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
October 10, 2009
Though I’m not a film critic, this article could well have been about me in that it was Doordarshan that “shaped my cinematic sensibilities”. And 90% of my exposure to regional cinema was thanks to DD…sunday afternoon regional movie slot was something I really looked forward to when everyone else at home thought I was a fool missing a relaxing Sunday afternoon nap.
LikeLike
chhotesaab
October 10, 2009
This is precisely why I (and lot of others) believe in your views about a movie – if you criticize a movie or an aspect of it, I know that you had not made up your mind to bash that movie before even watching it, a feeling I get from most other critics. You are a true movie buff and nothing for you is bad cinema before you watch it (well almost nothing) – sort of like that great teacher who says no questions are stupid and means it. I feel the same way for cricket and cricket fans also – most of them don’t understand the game but criticise as if they are professionals (esp. the matchfixing allegations after every loss). I feel it is the greatness of Indian cricket that it survives and thrives inspite of BCCI, just like it is the greatness of Indian films that they survive and thrive inspite of censor board. Keep it up and don’t get too dismissive of the movies you don’t like!
LikeLike
Suresh S
October 10, 2009
Yup. Lot of us have a lot to thank Doordarshan for. Atleast in the movies front, after Doordarshan vanished, I haven’t seen a decent non commercial movie. I still remember watching some great movies late in the night, ‘Andrei Rublev’, ‘Fanny and Alexander’, ‘Aparajito’ and some like ‘Mukhamukam’ on a Sunday afternoon. Not to mention movies like ‘Baiju Bawra’, ‘Tansen’ etc.
One program on movies which was terrific was a ‘History of Cinema’ type of program. I don’t remember the exact title. It had a person called Hariharan (was he the Malaylam director Hariharan?) hosting it. It was my first exposure to world cinema and this man over a few weeks took people through lot of film history from an world films perspective. I wish someone would released this on DVD. (The other short film I saw on TV and which I want on DVD is ‘Picnic’ which was directed by Aparna Sen. Shabana was very good, as usual, in this movie. But a Bengali actress who acts as her sister, just ate her up!! Anyone know the name of this actress.)
I am deliberately avoid mentioning music since I don’t want my comment to be longer than Baradwaj’s article 😀
LikeLike
Shankar
October 11, 2009
Also…not to forget made for TV movies such as “Janam” and “Ek Ruka Hua Faisla”
Baddy, as you say, I know most of us cannot watch long drawn dramas such as Humlog and Buniyaad now…but they were fun to watch then (atleast Buniyaad). I used to enjoy watching the characters of Kiran Juneja, Mazhar Khan, Kanwaljit Singh (where did he and his wife disappear?) etc. Some of the other shows I used to watch regularly were “Khaandan”,”Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi”, “Mr ya Mrs” etc. It’s possible it was because they were the only fare on TV, but those were the growing times in Indian television history and it does take time for evolution. Those were the simpler (and fun) days!! 🙂
LikeLike
Maru
October 11, 2009
I’d like to jump on the bandwagon here and agree that you’ve captured the view of the entire generation that grew up on DD. Like you, my exposure to cinema (all kinds) was shaped by DD, but also I think my love for BBC’s programming. I can still enjoy Yes Minister, Fawlty Towers and To the Manner Born. I love BBC documentaries and my love of all kinds of documentaries today was born from the early exposure to them on DD. It’s a nice tribute to DD that folks like me definitely share in 🙂
LikeLike
anon
October 11, 2009
The Bengali actress was Shrila Mazumdar- debuted with Benegal’s Aarohan.Also seen in Mandi, Damul and Yatra.
LikeLike
VJ
October 11, 2009
Do you remember when in early 90’s Doordarshan started telecasting movies on Friday night at 9:30 PM ? They had so many ads that it took almost 4hrs to finsih a movie . We had a tiny B&W Televijay tv back then and I still remember watching Salangai Oli spellbound , without getting up even to pee the whole 4 hrs 🙂
that was my introduction to Kamal Hassan and cinema in general and th eromance continues till date .
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
October 11, 2009
Suresh, If I’m not mistaken, that Bengali actress in Picnic was Sreela Majumdar…A fantastic actress who, I think, appeared in many Mrinal Sen films as well. Incidentally, Konkona Sen Sharma played the role of Shabana Azmi’s kid in Picnic.
LikeLike
brangan
October 11, 2009
Arif Attar: Reg. “They say competition is good for the consumer. Look what it has done to TV entertainment.” — absolutely. Everything has become film-based now. I was flipping through news channels yesterday and most of them were celebrating Rekha turning 55. I mean, that’s not even a milestone age (and even if it were, it’s a snippet news, the kind that deserves a spot towards the end, like the entertainment bits were sequenced on “The World This Week”)
Aditya Pant: Of course you’re a film critic. Everyone is. Just not professionally 🙂
Suresh S: Oh, please talk about anything you want to. And do not worry about comment length.
Maru: You’re talking of BBC programming as part of DD, right? I remember “Yes Minister” and “Fawlty Towers,” but not “To the Manner Born.” Oh, and if you love documentaries, consider this a plug for my “Between Reviews” installment the Sunday after next. It’s about the journey of the Indian documentary — and it’s not as boring as it sounds, I promise 🙂
VJ: You were introduced to Kamal in the early ’90s? The mind boggles 🙂
LikeLike
Suresh S
October 11, 2009
Aditya / Anon,
Thanks for the info on Sreela Mazumdar. I remembered the Mazumdar part. If I remember correctly, she acted in Prakash Jha’s ‘Damal’ as well. I remember Pritish Nandy giving a rave review of her performance. I was convinced about what he said when I watched ‘Picnic’.
I concur with Maru about the BBC Programs that came on DD. We used to wait for the Sherlock Holmes one. The guy who played Sherlock Holmes in this series was probably the best Sherlock Holmes of them all. He brought a lot of energy and manic intensity to that role. I guess nowadays it is available on DVD but anticipation to watch what episode comes on air that week is something else.
LikeLike
Suresh S
October 11, 2009
Baradwaj,
I personally feel that the amount of effort DD and AIR have put in to sustain Indian Classical music requires a big book to enumerate. A mere comment or even an article wouldn’t do.
Coming to the film music part, yes, it used to be a joy watching ‘Chitrahaar’, ‘Chitramala’ and others. Infact one of these ‘Chitra’ programs used to feature songs from all languages. So we got to see Bengali songs, Marathi songs, Malayalam songs etc. It was a great learning experience. Nowadays with satellite TV people watch programs only in their own languages!! A pity.
LikeLike
VJ
October 11, 2009
I was only 12 or 13 back then dude
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
October 11, 2009
Hi Baradwaj,
That was a wonderful piece. I too get all nostalgic when I think of all those mid-80s to early-90s Doordarshan shows. Used to love Sundays; would start with a kids serial called ‘Ek, do , teen, char’, then ‘Cosmos’, Rajani (my favourite), the regional language film, a program called sports this week, Vikram aur Betaal, Spiderman cartoon and then the weekly movie. Was also a big fan of Mr. ya Mrs., Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi, Khandaan and Subaah. Hate the present day saas-bahu serials (my wife keeps watching them, therefore forced to see these serials once in a while). Doordarshan was so much better than all these new channels.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
October 11, 2009
Baradwaj, just one more thing. Since there was a passing mention of ‘Thavamai ..’ in your piece, wanted to share my views on the movie. I thought that though the story was ‘old’, the treatment (like subdued performances, realistic dialogues, absence of melodrama) was pretty modern. This is just my opinion, I might be wrong.
LikeLike
S
October 11, 2009
Brangan,
I remember watching and liking movies like “In which Annie gives it Those Ones” – (written by Arundathi Roy who also had a key part, Shahrukh in a fleeting appearance)and Hariharan’s “Ezhavadhu Manidhan”. I agree with you that DD had a more holistic approach without division into art and commercial movies.
However, I feel that(belonging to your generation, but I think some years older) your sensibilities may have been shaped more by the zeitgeist and socio-cultural context of the 80s in Madras/ India rather than by DD alone. I remember watching many English movies-mostly in Casino, but also in some theatres in Mount Road- while in college in the late 80s that were not the usual Hollywood stuff; we also used to sit and discuss those movies over tea.
Recently I read a review of Subramaniapuram by director Hariharan who had praised the movie for its handling of the theme of discontent/nonconformism/angst of youth. He was of the opinion that such themes are completely absent in today’s Tamil cinema (BTW,I had a point of dispute with your review of Subramaniapuram wherein you felt that a person of Kamal’s calibre would have conveyed the complexity of emotions much better than Jai in the scene that leads to his killing. However, I felt that the scene worked well just because of the simplicity of a newcomer’s emoting; kamal would have emoted in a way that made his brain almost transparent with the audience reading his thinking. The difference is internalisation in the former and externalisation in the latter.Sorry for this long interlude, this has been on my mind for a long time and this is the first time I am commenting in your blog though I read it quite often 🙂 ). I totally agree with him.
So the difference, I think (which may have influenced your evolution) is the nonconformism/ multiple perspectives/ individualism of the 80s vs conformism/ single perspective from the late 90s onward. I remember watching a movie called Omar Mukhtar and liking it ( don’t remember much about it today), but without knowing its genre, whether it has stock characters, forming opinion not through political correctness, but through individual internalisation.I don’t even know whether it is supposed to be a good movie or a bad movie by whose-ever’s standards.
I also remember a DD serialisation of novelist Indumathi’s “Tharayil Irangum Vimanangal” with Raghuvaran playing the lead role, not wanting to be “a square”. This would have been true in all walks of life-including education, career, interests in the arts, etc., While the choices in today’s world in India are wider, I think thay have been institutionalised, codified and packaged. Whereas earlier, the choices one made were dictated by interests, randomness, sometimes serendipity 🙂
Ofcourse, all this could be merely a generational thing 🙂 However, I don’t think so- the rate of transformations have been so abrupt in the past two decades. The postmodern age which had its origin in the US in the 60s and 70s is maybe finding its way in India in the past two decades- simulacra,flatness vs depth, form vs content, manufacturing opinion and so on… (Though widely appreciated, I think that Maniratnam is at the head of such changes in cinema but I don’t wish to go deeper for fear of disturbing status quo and holy cows -:)
Sorry for the length of this comment, as I mentioned, I am commenting for the first time 🙂 )
LikeLike
Karthik
October 11, 2009
RanganJi, Aap twitter mein abhi tak kyon nahi hai Ji?
LikeLike
Vivek Mohan
October 12, 2009
Dude, you are Old!
LikeLike
The Normal Guy
October 12, 2009
@brangan : Hows this for a movie? The world is predicted to end because of a solar flare that would penetrate the earth’s atmosphere and burn the crust.The solar flare ‘attacks’ the earth’s atmosphere as predicted on the D-day but the world doesn’t end because of the reduced intensity of the flare.But,the intensity is just enough to melt all the tv satellites circling the earth.All except DD !
So,the whole world has no choice but to tune into DD.And its upto DD to reinvent itself and lead the world before the other channels are back on air.:D
LikeLike
Anonymous
October 12, 2009
Very nice BR. Really nice. The general theme we see in the comments above is the range of programming we were subjected to and our acceptance to most of them. I am more of a 90’s person, but still we did not have cable at home and I ended up watching DD most of the time. The current generation has everything at their footsteps, so whatever they want to watch, they watch unlike us who saw whatever was available, in effect exposing us to so many things we never knew about. It’s sad that kids these days have no idea about regional cinema or songs of yore. Their time is pretty much taken up by PS2, XBOX and Facebook. Reading habits too have changed significantly, I grew up on Chacha Chaudhary, Pinki, Champak, Tinkle, Nagaraj, Mandrake whereas it’s Harry Potter/Virgin Comics now. Maybe I am wrong, but most of what we are seeing now is due to the fact that globalisation took its roots in the 90’s and hence we were exposed greatly to the western culture which was flashier and more in your face than the staid fare (with a lot of substance I must say) on DD. So, TV in India has gone the global route with almost all of Indian Reality TV programming based out of Western influences. Let’s see how things pan out, there is always a future and I am sure the post 2000 kids will ramble on this blog with you 10 years from now :).
PS: I have no idea if this comment has any coherence 🙂 .
LikeLike
Pankaj
October 12, 2009
Baradwaj,
You are a magician! I grew up reading film reviews in The Sunday Times of India and thought they were the greatest of all but you are undoubtedly the best.
It may seem weird (and maybe pathetic) but my eyes went funny reading this tribute to DD.
Thank you so much.
Pankaj
LikeLike
brangan
October 12, 2009
S: You may be right. There was the opportuity to watch older English films like “MacKenna’s Gold” on the big screen. (Every time I pass Mount Round and see the heaps of garbage on the ghost site that formerly held Safire theatre, my heart breaks.) But I’d say there’s DVD today, and a far wider range of films available.
About “Subramaniyapuram,” I thought I mentioned Kamal in his prime, when his bag of acting tricks was not yet fully revealed to us. Anyway, that’s an entirely different discussion 🙂
Reg. “I don’t even know whether it is supposed to be a good movie or a bad movie by whose-ever’s standards” – and that’s the best way to go about watching films. Too many people, I feel, seek to achieve consensus. “If the critics rate it highly, I should like it too.” That sort of thing. That really defeats one of the main reasons for watching a film, which is to form your own individual equation with it and conduct your own dialogue with it.
And your point about Mani Ratnam is also spot on in some ways, though, as you say, let’s not open a can of worms here 🙂
Karthik: Just out of curiosity, how would Twittering help? I’d barely be able to squeeze even a single sentence of mine into a tweet 🙂
Anon: Reg. the whole westernisation aspect you bring up. that’s why I think, for instance, film reviewers of the future will not be able to relate to melodrama at all (assuming such films are still made). And they’ll have to rely on critical consenus of the past to form their bearings, without much first-hand experience of it themselves.
Even today, I have the sneaky feeling that (despite his melodramatic tendencies) Guru Dutt is held in such high esteem solely by default, because critical consensus over the years has enshrined him as God. But I wonder how many have actually seen his films, for it’s always “Pyaasa” that’s trotted out as great. There’s very little mention of something like “Aar Paar,” which is quite delightful in many ways. Just as Woody Allen keeps complaining that he’s constantly told by his fans (after he drifted into drama) that they want him to go back to making those early comedies again, I suspect there’s a case to be made for Dutt too.
LikeLike
Vamshi
October 12, 2009
Suresh – that programme was called Understanding Cinema, which used to be telecast on the UGC programme (i used to watch UGC too, take that). It was a wonderful series, something that really opened my teenage mind to the film making techniques and history. It used to have episodes dedicated to photography, editing, music etc.
LikeLike
a
October 12, 2009
Call it nostalgia(and what is wrong with wallowing in one’s perceived sense of the past I might ask!!) but your article brought back that time when Television was new and had not taken over our lives.I Thank DD for Malgudi days and my dose of films with smitha patil…And the discussions we used to have with visiting cousins after..!!
In a strange way, what disturbed me about wakeup sid is the feeling of isolation I felt…of how the frames,the music and the audience’s expectation of each scene trying to create an oomph..leaves you a little cold.The constant barrage of images in a rather frenzied state I suppose is the sign of our times..and the only discussion after a film is “oh its good\oh its bad..where do we have lunch(..ie whats the next high)
I think we need to bring back some sense of community and appreciation to watching films…until then, I will find solace in the arms of “Rashomon”!!
and happy diwali..take a BReak..bungee jump,gorge on sweets and watch a film sans notebook and critical eye
may the muse continue to shine…
LikeLike
SS
October 12, 2009
Delightful article, Mr Rangan. Evoked many memories not just about the programs but the way life was then… My dad would turn on the song program real loud to wake me up on sunday mornings… And me doing my studies around TV programs and movies e.g. Saaz – I had just finished one exam and had another one in 3 days… I watched Kamal’s Mahanadi on DD and was deeply impacted, probably a bit young to understand the nuances…
I never thought of DD in that sense – that it shaped in some way our “cinematic sensibilities”…
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
October 12, 2009
“I concur with Maru about the BBC Programs that came on DD. We used to wait for the Sherlock Holmes one. The guy who played Sherlock Holmes in this series was probably the best Sherlock Holmes of them all. He brought a lot of energy and manic intensity to that role. I guess nowadays it is available on DVD but anticipation to watch what episode comes on air that week is something else.”
Aha, another Jeremy Brett fan. I have DVD of that series (20 episodes) and it is still immensely worth watching. He brought life into the character of SH. The over all production quality of that series was excellent.
LikeLike
Priti
October 12, 2009
such a warm article – i don’t know if i can describe it anyhow else. although i was around 6 years old when satellite tv came to india, even my earliest memories are associated with dd.
and you are right about the “look past the tatty signage and the other outwardly downmarket aspects.” the programmes have so much potential, but somehow don’t get there, because the guise is so outdated.
a friend and i were seriously contemplating applying to dd, to be a part of their programming department, to sort of see if we can try to shake thigns up a bit. so upbeat and ambitious (and quixotic) we were, the prospect of infusing some young blood there was so exciting. but we were thoroughly discouraged by someone who used to work at dd before; dd hasn’t recruited anyone in YEARS, and wasn’t planning to either. and to plough through all the bureaucracy, secure a government appointment, and TRY to do something, it was all just dismissed as impossible. so yeah. but it pains me to see dd decaying like this…
sorry. rant happened. 😀
LikeLike
Ratnakar Sadasyula
October 12, 2009
BR, belong to your generation myself, apart from making me a part time movie analyst, Doordarshan bought out the Quizzing enthusiast in me with programs like Quiz Time, Alpha Plus, SAARC quiz. And it had the best movie collection for sure.
The issue however is that DD is slowly losing it’s market, people who want “infotainment” kind of stuff, look to NGC, Discovery India, History Channel which give out really good programs, and also with better production values. Also with these channels focusing on India, DD no longer has the USP there. NGC came up with Udaan, a sort of live televised show, about a group of participants selected for the Indian Air Force training, and that was really interesting. History Channel has recently come up with a great series on the rise of LTTE.
Again in sports, with Star Sports, ESPN, Neo, Ten Sports all comming up with better telecasts, DD is losing there too. It can’t even claim World Cup Football, 2002 WC Soccer was telecast by Ten Sports and 2006 WC Soccer was telecast by ESPN.
LikeLike
Ratnakar Sadasyula
October 12, 2009
Also regarding the movies part, again DD, can no longer claim an USP here. B4U Movies shows some lovely old B&W classics, as well as artsy stuff, SET Max, UTV, Filmy, Zee Cinema all show older movies and in fact with much better prints.
One way DD can recapture the market is making some really good serials, we need something better than the “SAAS- BAHU”, “BALIKA BADHU” stuff. It can’t keep wallowing in Nostalgia and living on past Glory.
LikeLike
Maru
October 12, 2009
brangan: yep i meant the BBC programming on DD. at the time DD was our window to the world outside. i look forward to your piece on the indian documentary. the domain per se rarely wearies me, if its thoughtful and well crafted -as your stuff usually is – it never fails to hook me 🙂
also, can i just say that with your views on twitter you’ve really managed to endear yourself 😉 . it’s not just the matter of sharing inane stuff like your fave brand of cereal with the world, its the idea that every thought that passes thru one’s head can and should be expressed in 140 characters. what’s with that? how about thoughtful and considered discussion and i’m sure that can’t be had in 140 characters 😉 . sorry! i’ll step off the soap box now. anyway, i wonder how long you’ll resist the lure of twitter. most of your colleagues seem to have embraced it with gusto!
sureshs, tambidude: i loved the sherlock holmes series too and really looked forward to it. brangan’s piece has unleashed a lot a great memories.
LikeLike
brangan
October 15, 2009
a: Reg. “The constant barrage of images,” in “Wake Up Sid,” I’d say that’s what makes the film watchable, at least while you’re watching it. Had there been more “lingering,” I suppose it would have exposed more of the film’s weaknesses. And yet, there are people who’ve told me they found the film too slow.
Tambi Dude: There were just 20 episodes? Thinking back, I seem to remember that the series went on for quite a while 🙂
Priti: That’s the tragedy wth most of these government-run places. It’s surprising how, even in this day and age of private enterprise, babu-dom is such a fixture.
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
October 15, 2009
The 2 DVDs I have have 20 episodes.
There are around 44 episodes of Granada Telivison Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes series. The production of it was from 1984 till 1993.
The last few years were terrible as JB was not keeping good health. He died in 1995. He looked cadaverous in the episodes shot around 1993. I saw few of them in AMC channel.
Interestingly another actor (Paul Eddington) who played another favorite character of mine, Prime Minister Jim of Yes Prime Minister died in 1995.
LikeLike
Anonymous
October 20, 2009
Thanks for bringing back memories of DD. One of the good things they did was to televise some well-known works of Indian literature. I seem to remember Premchand’s Karambhoomi & Nirmala, Saratchandra’s Srikanta & Charitraheen & many more. Cable/satellite channels are certainly not going to produce these!
LikeLike