It appeared, at first, that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was a decidedly odd title for a book about discovering horcruxes – those magical objects containing splinters of Voldemort’s soul – and destroying the Dark Lord. Why not the more straightforward Harry Potter and the Horcruxes? What part do the Hallows – the elder wand, the resurrection stone, the invisibility cloak – play in Harry’s quest, except as tangential highlights, scribbles along the margins? But as anyone familiar with JK Rowling’s remarkable adventures now knows, the journey to the destination – the end, in this case – is incomplete without detours on winding bylanes, some of which are frustrating dead ends, many of which offer sights the undeviating traveller can never hope to experience. And only gradually do we stumble upon the revelation that Deathly Hallows is as much about Harry vanquishing Voldemort as his becoming – at least for a brief while – the owner of the Hallows, the wizarding Holy Grail, which makes him the Master of Death. In other words, The Boy Who Lived… And Lived And Lived.
David Yates’ screen adaptation strives for this sense of serendipity, most notably in the scene where Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) finally seal their long-simmering relationship with a kiss. In the book, Hermione flies into Ron’s arms upon learning of his hitherto unexpressed commitment to house elves, but here, the moment is graver, far more resonant. Filling out a scene only alluded to by Rowling, Yates shows Ron and Hermione entering the Chamber of Secrets in order to retrieve basilisk fangs that will enable them to destroy the horcrux that is Helga Hufflepuff’s cup. (Good luck trying to understand any of that if you’re a stranger to the Potter universe.) Mission accomplished – then they are besieged by an explosion of water. They run for their lives. And then, just as suddenly as it began, the tsunami ends. That’s when the kiss happens, when they are flushed with victory at having their own little moment in Harry Potter’s story, and when they’re scared and alone and aware that there is still a war raging outside and they may not live another day. This, we think, is how it must have really happened.
But elsewhere – and inevitably – it’s still Harry’s story. The first two films, overstuffed and underdone, lumbered under the leaden hand of director Chris Columbus, who felt compelled to transfer to screen every detail in the book. With Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, still the best film in the series, Alfonso Cuarón jettisoned large chunks of exposition in favour of narrative excitement, and that’s the model the subsequent films have followed. Fans of the books, therefore, have grown used to inhabiting these films in a parallel dimension in which the same characters do the same things but in slightly different ways, and we console ourselves that this is primarily Potter’s story and we have to hurry through it in two-something hours, and that the supporting characters given short shrift in the films are still in the books, where we can meet them any time we wish. Still, it’s a shock to witness the abbreviation of one of the most unexpected deaths in Deathly Hallows. We barely register the tragedy, and without this emotional freight, a famous wand-off towards the end rings horribly hollow.
The other complaint is that Deathly Hallows could have used some of the briskness of the book. While it’s admirable that Yates wants to break free of the bad habits of the modern-day summer movie – the reckless cutting; the relentless noise (this has got to be the quietest blockbuster of all time) – we’re left with the feeling that he tilts too much in the other direction, sacrificing adventure for a solemn sense of occasion. We’re asked to remember, every minute, that this is not just a movie, any movie, but something momentous, that it’s not just the close of a story but the end of a pop-culture era. That’s possibly why the director inflates the final face-off between Harry and Voldemort into a meaningless action sequence far removed from the book, where they duelled in the midst of students and teachers, and inside Hogwarts, where both were schooled and where they both learned their magic. Why have Voldemort crumble into the ether with only Harry as mute witness? Why not give us the satisfaction of a cheer ringing out from the rest of the wizarding world at Hogwarts? Even joy is muted in this last installment.
But if Deathly Hallows isn’t quite Prisoner of Azkaban or Half-Blood Prince, it’s still a worthy conclusion to the series, thanks largely to actors who’ve come to feel like family. Daniel Radcliffe has grown so fully into his alter ego that it’s going to be difficult to see him in anything else again, without the spectacles and the lightning scar, though the best performance comes from Maggie Smith (as the starchy Professor McGonagall). She packs off Snape (the always entertaining Alan Rickman, whose speech seems to get slower and slower, as if struggling to burst through a sludge of ever-thickening molasses) with a spirited brandish of her wand, alliteratively inducts a student into the defence of Hogwarts on the basis of his “particular proclivity for pyrotechnics,” and brings stone statues to life by invoking Piertotum Locomotor. Simpering like a schoolgirl after a first kiss, she confesses, “I’ve always wanted to use that spell.” Minerva McGonagall may be a far greater witch in the books, but the movies are where we get glimpses of mighty acting magic. The heart swells upon sighting, for fleeting seconds, professors Trelawney and Flitwick and Sprout, reminders all of a far more innocent age of witchcraft and wizardry, but the film’s finest surge of emotion arrives at the end, during the epilogue, when we realise we’ve come full circle, to a time where being a wizard carries no more responsibilities than crashing through a brick wall and being on time for a train.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2011 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Pradyumna M
July 16, 2011
I was very excited about this movie even though I have never taken a liking to the earlier installments but ‘Why have Voldemort crumble into the ether with only Harry as mute witness? Why not give us the satisfaction of a cheer ringing out from the rest of the wizarding world at Hogwarts? Even joy is muted in this last installment.’ and ‘Still, it’s a shock to witness the abbreviation of one of the most unexpected deaths in Deathly Hallows. We barely register the tragedy, and without this emotional freight, a famous wand-off towards the end rings horribly hollow.’ WTF! :O Now having seconds thoughts on this now.. :S
LikeLike
Mohammed Shaneem
July 16, 2011
did you go for the 3D version?
LikeLike
rameshram
July 16, 2011
Harry potter is dead.
cinema.
LikeLike
vikram
July 16, 2011
On a different topic, do we get a bulletpoint review of ‘zindagi milegi na dobara’
LikeLike
IMB
July 17, 2011
Was thoroughly disappointed with the way Yated handled the final fight-off. I wanted everyone to witness the moment. And what was even more disappointing was that there was no explanation for why Harry survived Voldermort’s attack in the dark forest – THE most important aspect of this series. Disappointing movie for me (despite the some brilliant moments) simply because the soul of the series was not captured at all in that final fight off , which the rest of the wizarding world should have witnessed as you rightly pointed out. More importantly, for omitting Harry’s last speech to Voldermort which is the heart and soul of the series, I feel.
LikeLike
Apu
July 17, 2011
Everywhere I read, they say that the 1st and second movie of the series were the worst…and today I read the reason – that it was too heavy, and transferred the book to the screen in totality, without cinematic liberty. As a BIG Potter fan, I actually loved that the 1st movie did not take out anything, and managed to keep most of Rowling’s humor and warmth.
Will surely catch this one!
LikeLike
ano
July 17, 2011
Ditto @ IMB. And yes, it was way too quiet. It didn’t feel at all like the spectacular ending it ought to have been to such a phenomenal series.
LikeLike
Abhishek
July 18, 2011
In one word, the movie was UNDERWHELMING.
LikeLike
munimma
July 18, 2011
If I had not read the books, the last movie would have been totally confusing with so many open ends, especially the climax. Azkaban is my favorite too. I said so when that movie ended and still maintain that. Some of it felt like catching glimpses of a city while speeding on a train. But still, enjoyed the experience.
LikeLike
Nice Guy
July 18, 2011
I have said this somewhere else too what the movies required were someone like Peter Jackson who had read the books in his school days and dreams about making it into movie for some donkey years. They rushed into the movies, I am sure someone will revisit for a reboot for better set of movies till then I prefer the books.
LikeLike
Indian Top Blogs
July 19, 2011
Hi
Congratulations! The Directory of Best Indian Blogs is out and your nice blog figures in that. We thought, let’s announce that to you.
Since all blogs do not have emails clearly mentioned, we have taken the liberty of telling you of this by making a comment on your latest blogpost. Hope, you don’t mind it.
Happy blogging!
ITB team
LikeLike
Shaitan
July 26, 2011
I did enjoy the movie (I always do), but however I disagree with @IMB.
(*Spoilers alert*)
The major flaw of the film, is imo, how it didn’t explain why Harry didn’t die and how he became Voldy’s final horcrux. This might be somewhat confusing for non-readers. Fred honestly deserved his death scene, and i felt somewhat uncomfortable with the fact that his death was brushed over, it was one of the most touching parts of the book. Besides Lavender doesn’t die in the book IIRC.
And the scene where Bellatrix explodes, I mean seriously?
LikeLike
Marv
November 21, 2011
I loved the first two movies because they so closely mirrored the books – after all, isn’t that why we go to see the movie? I don’t believe a movie should be the interpretation of the director, producer, or anyone other than the author; therefore the efforts of Chris Columbus were perfect. I wish he had done all 7!!!
Although I am sad that the Harry Potter series is over, I am glad that the HP7 movies are over. I am not a fan of them at all, especially part 2. It was so dark that you could not figure out who/what was on the screen; which not only made things confusing but also gave me a headache.
LikeLike