James Franco follows up his Oscar-nominated turn in 127 Hours – that pop-existentialist meditation on the imperativeness of courage, calmness and a mobile phone – by playing second banana to an ape. The young star may be the name on the marquee in Rise of the Planet of the Apes, but he’s outranked in the end credits by Andy Serkis, the actor who most famously portrayed (rather, motion-captured) Gollum in the Lord of the Rings movies and who motion-captures, here, a chimpanzee that’s this film’s protagonist. At first, this simian is just an adorable infant, handed over to Will Rodman (Franco) in a swaddling blanket. He grows up in the Rodman home like a human child, bounding about in his room in the attic. But gradually, his natural instincts assert themselves and he harms a hostile neighbour. His confusion – torn between the human knowledge that he has hurt someone, done wrong, and the animal impulse to attack, to defend – is a wonder to behold. Serkis reminds you that the best special effect is still the human face – at least, the humanoid face.
This scene occurs fairly early in Rupert Wyatt’s film, and that’s when I knew this was not just a routine summer blockbuster out to plunder the past. The first Planet of the Apes movie, seen today, is a curio notable primarily for its shock ending. (Although audiences of the time might have also responded to Charlton Heston’s casting: a monument – Moses! Ben-Hur! Michelangelo! – reduced to a mere man.) Instead of travestying that memory, as Tim Burton’s remake did, Rise of the Planet of the Apes grapples with an altogether different narrative, about a genetics facility (where Will Rodman is employed as a scientist) in a quest to cure Alzheimer’s. Will develops a brain-boosting formula that he tests on a chimpanzee — he inadvertently kick-starts the diminishment of his race. The chimp becomes so smart that, as the tag line promises, “evolution becomes revolution.” In the opening scene, an ape is captured in the jungles and confined in a lab cage. Eventually, the chimp portrayed by Serkis sets these captives free. He is called Caesar, a worthy name for a would-be ruler. He might have been called Spartacus.
Along with this slave uprising, Wyatt tips his hat to the prison-break movie, upends the Tarzan-Mowgli trajectory (here, an ape is distanced from its habitat and raised amidst humans), and fashions a cautionary myth about the perils of playing God. (It may be no accident that a spacecraft alluded to in the film is named Icarus.) Rise of the Planet of the Apes, then, is the shocking popcorn movie that actually traffics with ideas. Wyatt knows that his material is ridiculous, but he takes it seriously and spawns an almost-epic, which falters only when it focuses on its human characters. The relationships between Will and his father (John Lithgow) and Will and his girlfriend (Freida Pinto) are pleasant but unremarkable, while the connection between Will and Caesar carries the charge of a failed father and his disillusioned son. These dramatic beats animate the earlier portions; the mayhem is kept for the end. By present-day standards, the filmmaking is almost classical, slow development followed by thrilling crescendo. Even the action scenes are artful – a quiet image of leaves falling from trees, like rain, raises the curtain on a rousing climax.
More than anything, Rise of the Planet of the Apes makes the case that American blockbusters are best made, these days, by non-Americans. Wyatt is British – like David Yates, who helmed the last few Harry Potter installments, and Kenneth Branagh, who made Thor, the most entertaining superhero movie of the year-so-far – and like his compatriots he’s adept in situating strains of human-scale drama in the midst of computer-generated spectacle. Take the near-wordless dinner-table scene where Caesar teaches his “grandfather” to hold a fork as his “father” watches in amazement, or the later moment where, after being separated from Will and sequestered with other apes, Caesar spurns the prospect of returning to his home and opts to stay with his own kind. It’s agonising to imagine what this premise might have become in the hands of Michael Bay. Smirk all you want that this praise is being heaped on a film with talking apes, but it’s been a while since disbelief was so effectively suspended.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2011 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
nandhu
August 6, 2011
I am planning to watch the Apes movie tonight, but what irks me is the fact that I missed Thor. Have to get the DVD.
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
August 6, 2011
“…American blockbusters are best made, these days, by non-Americans.”
“…like his compatriots he’s adept in situating strains of human-scale drama in the midst of computer-generated spectacle.”
So, is Mike Newell with Prince of Persia included in that list? Kidding, kidding. I agree. Some of the best “blockbuster” films this year have been crafted by British directors. Joe Wright’s Hanna. Matthew Vaughn’s X-Men: First Class.
That reminds me, I know you don’t really appreciate comic-book films (or atleast that’s the impression I got from your reviews), but has Captain America been released there? Are you going to watch/review it?
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
August 6, 2011
And whatever happened to Draco Malfoy in this film? Or is his role relegated to that two-second scene in the trailers?
LikeLike
Arnav
August 6, 2011
It really is not an accident that the spacecraft referred to is named Icarus. The spacecraft in the 1968 original was called Icarus. The film is apparently filled with such easter eggs – I haven’t been able to see the movie in Mumbai yet because of some stupid tussle between multiplex owners and Fox
LikeLike
bran1gan
August 6, 2011
Aurora Vampiris: Damn, I should have included Vaughn’s name in the list. Nope, Captain America hasn’t made it here yet. Is that the Shazam guy? I have vague memories of a black-and-white movie with him…
LikeLike
avanthika
August 7, 2011
Don’t you think the story line is very similar to Endhiran? 🙂
LikeLike
prasun
August 7, 2011
Maybe because I saw Project Nim last week, but I did not see one original idea in this film. Except for the casting, which was a bit unusual.
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
August 7, 2011
Haha! Are you asking about Captain America? No, he’s not the Shazam guy. Captain America is a costumed super-hero in blue-red spandex. It’s the latest installment in the Marvel Movie Franchise – Hulk, Iron Man (1 and 2), Thor and now this (it’s a WW2 film with comic book over-tones, apparently). And then, next year – The Avengers. It’s got Chris Evans (The flaming Human Torch from The Fantastic Four) in the title role. Also, it’s got Tommy Lee Jones. I think.
That said, how was Tom Felton in this The Rise of the Planet of the Apes? Does he even have a role?
LikeLike
rameshram
August 7, 2011
Branigan, captain america is a marvel comics film . it’s what I call a jewish super hero film (like superman and spiderman…Ironman, fantastic four…which has a tradition in the 1950’s New york literary scene, The heroes are usually fallible good guys who come good without anybody they know suspecting that they are superheroes. The villains usually are either hitler’s general types or are local mafiosi twisted to surrealistic proportions. Marvel(tm) retains the franchising rights to its superheroes and tried to keep them as faithful to the comic books as possible,
LikeLike
Arun B
August 8, 2011
Just watched it tonight. I’m amazed at the depth and attention to detail behind the believability aspect of this reboot. This to me raises it to the level of the 1st Matrix installment. I just hope the upcoming sequels don’t squander the amazing setup provided by this movie.
LikeLike
rameshram
August 8, 2011
What a terrible movie ! What a terrible review!
LikeLike
mohan
August 8, 2011
@rangan
Off-topic sorry.
Did you watch Deiva Thirumagal? What did you feel about the film and the acting by Vikram and the little girl? And how come nothing on it? ‘Cause it was a remake?
LikeLike
bran1gan
August 8, 2011
Aurora Vampiris: He has a small role, a Draco Malfoy redux. He meets a fine end, though.
mohan: Don’t plan to see it. Suffered through Ajay Devgan channelling Sean Penn because I had to review that film. Have no desire to see Vikram do the same (though I’m fairly sure he’ll be better than Devgan). Sorry 🙂
LikeLike
mohan
August 9, 2011
@rangan
It’s ok. I already saw it. It was a decent movie. Wasn’t great by any stretch of imagination, but definitely very touching. Not much to speak of in terms of screenplay, photography or direction, but solid, must-cry performances from everyone. Did not find it worth the hype though. And for your info, it is not an EXACT remake, rather they have taken the main crux involving mental illness and legal battle for custody over the child but changed many significant details. Worth watching once. After a long time, you will see pure innocence and love on display.
LikeLike
KayKay
August 10, 2011
Planning to catch it this weekend, Mr.B.
Currently going “ape-shit” re-watching all the earlier flicks (5 movies of varying quality and one truly WTF remake by Tim Burton)
LikeLike
Avik Pramanik
August 11, 2011
Okay. So King Kong, Gollum, Captain Haddock (in upcoming Tintin) and Ceaser the Ape…
This is Andy Serkis’s recent portfolio and you won’t know him even if you see him, cause all of them are acted under heavy make-up and/or complete CGI-Motion Capture.
Isn’t it time he gets a character named after him, with a secret identity, cap and mask… 🙂
LikeLike
Rakesh
August 11, 2011
LikeLike
Mambazha Manidhan
August 22, 2011
“27 Hours – that pop-existentialist meditation on the imperativeness of courage, calmness and a mobile phone”
Hmmm..Not fair :). We didn’t get to read a piece on 127 hours. Speaking of which, what did you think of Veppam ? Bullet-point report requested.
LikeLike
Ashok
August 30, 2011
ROTPOTA was a classic sci-fi action movie. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
But was there a goof-up about Ceasar’s birth? Did the guy in the lab say that they didn’t know Ceasar’s mother was pregnant?
LikeLike