There’s the obvious kind of bad movie, one that’s written badly or performed badly or directed badly, the kind of film whose badness emanates from its very pores, like a scent meant to scare us away. Kunal Kohli’s Teri Meri Kahaani is the other kind of bad movie. There’s nothing aggressively bad about it, but there’s nothing good either – and there’s something frustrating when a film that could amount to something ends up being nothing. (From an obviously bad movie, on the other hand, we expect nothing and we get nothing.) On the surface, we have big stars (Shahid Kapoor and Priyanka Chopra) who are also capable performers, a big production budget that guarantees that the eye will have its fill, and, above everything else, a romantic high concept that a fairly competent Bollywood filmmaker should be able to execute in his sleep – the hero and heroine share a janam janam ka saath, they are destined to be together through an endless cycle of rebirths. But scratch the surface and there’s no charm, no emotion, no one to root for. There is little doubt that the leads will end up together, and we wait glumly for the slightest hint of a spanner in the works – an ex, a disgruntled parent, a poltergeist beneath the floorboards…
Teri Meri Kahaani tells three unrelated stories that begin when the hero and heroine run into each other accidentally – first in Poona in 1960, then in Stratford-upon-Avon in 2012, and finally in Lahore in 1910. For a while, it’s fun to see period-movie grandeur being lavished on something that’s not Big and Important, but a silly Shammi Kapoor movie – and for those interested in how effects are put together, the before-and-after images during the end credits are a useful show-and-tell on filmmaking in this digital age. The trouble, though, is hanging on till those end credits. Kohli’s direction, like his film, is all surface – he has the couple spouting couplets in 1910 and tweeting in 2012. The one interesting idea he has is to serve up all three romances with a side of sex. In our films, we like to pretend that people were purest in the past, but here, the Shahid Kapoor of Lahore is an unstoppable womaniser, and in 1960, a neighbour who sees him naked assures him that he has nothing to be ashamed about. This may be cause for celebration for teenage fans of the actor, but the rest of us have to endure his chemistry-free shenanigans with his leading lady, three times over. Forget rebirths, these two wouldn’t make it past a cup of coffee.
Copyright ©2012 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
venkatesh
June 26, 2012
“Forget rebirths, these two wouldn’t make it past a cup of coffee” – now thats funny.
Kunal Kohli : Overrated from the beginning , he has made the same film 5 times and it wasn’t good to start with.
LikeLike
Neera
June 26, 2012
Haha! Thanks for a refreshing serve of review, which alas, is more fun than most movies are.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
June 27, 2012
Kunak Kohli has made some shitty movies in the past. So it was expected that this too will be bad.
LikeLike
brangan
June 28, 2012
venkatesh: I don’t know that KK is “overrated.” I haven’t heard anyone talk of him as an auteur or anything — just a competent craftsman.
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 28, 2012
BR : KK and “competent” in the same sentence ….. surely not.Prabhu Deva is a competent craftsman – KK …. i beg to differ sir.
LikeLike
Bhavesh
June 29, 2012
venkatesh and BR:
My 2 cents here. In ‘coffee with karan’ episode with sanjay leela bhansali, he was asked : ‘who is the most overrated director in bollywood’? The answer came immediately: ‘kunal kohli’.
BR: loved the line – “In our films, we like to pretend that people were purest in the past”
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 29, 2012
Bhavesh: Did Mr Bhansali mention under his breath – but for him it would have been me 🙂 ?
LikeLike
Santosh Kumar T K
June 29, 2012
Kunal Kohli : Hindi cinema :: Ravi Shastri : Cricket commentary.
LikeLike
brangan
June 30, 2012
venkatesh: I think Prabhu Deva is a genius of his kind. Even his badly picturised songs like “Manjakaattu maina” have some very unusually thought-out choreography.
Santosh Kumar T K: ROFL
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 30, 2012
BR: Oh Prabhu Deva is by far one of the best choreographers in anywhere – no disputes there. As a director , he is a good competent craftsman.
LikeLike
pr3m
July 1, 2012
I knew Kohli produced this, but if he directed it, I’d stay far, far away. I gave Fanaa a chance, and realized that this guy doesn’t know his stuff.
LikeLike
raj
July 3, 2012
Prabhu “Deva” – as a director? Competent craftsman? Villu? stupid remakes of stupid telugu movies? Nuvvosthanante Nenoddantana( a mishmash of the “worst of 90s bollywood”)? Or the hindi remake of Nuvvosthanante in the offing?
Ok, perhaps you’d call Deva a competent craftsman, too. In that case, I applaud you for consistency.
LikeLike
raj
July 3, 2012
That is, ofcourse, addressed to Venkatesh
LikeLike
chhotesaab
July 4, 2012
Ravi Shastri is a much maligned commentator probably due to his BCCI connection, and he was a maligned cricketer in his playing days, because of his supposed lack of strokes. IMO, he was an underappreciated cricketer and more importantly for India, an underappreciated captain. He has one of the sharpest cricketing minds, and in the past quite a few players including Sachin Tendulkar have sought his advice to sort out there technical problems – Tendulkar most famously sought out his expertise to counter the outside the legstump attack of Warne in 1998 Chennai Test. Ironically, it was Chennai again in 1988, that he captained for the only time in a test, against WI and won, because he had the guts to instruct the curator to prepare a spin-friendly pitch and Narendra Hirwani took 16 wickets on debut. His commentary is as good or bad as others in IPL. It is fashionable to pick on Ravi Shastri, always was.
And yes, Kunal Kohli might be an overrated hindi film director.
LikeLike