When the events of fanciful popular culture make ugly inroads into our lives, the problem lies with us, and within us.
Christopher Nolan couldn’t have dreamed up a better title for his new Batman movie. The Dark Knight Rises. With the merest of alterations, it transforms into a newspaper headline for the day after the shooting that occurred during the film’s first screenings: “A dark night rises.” These murders, of course, are a unique American problem, arising as much from the easy availability of weapons as men with the unfortunate predilection for wielding them. For some grim fun, look up the Wikipedia entry titled “List of serial killers by country.” Argentina has two, Belarus one, Germany 17. The United States, on the other hand, has a link to a page of its own: so numerous are its citizens who are driven to snuff out other lives. James Eagen Holmes, the shooter who donned a mask and opened fire in a Colorado theatre, may not be a serial killer in the Hannibal Lecter sense. He may not have savoured his killings in quite the same way. But his compulsions aren’t all that different – chief among them the desire to make a statement in a flamboyant fashion.
Whenever a student stabs his teacher after watching Agneepath or despairing lovers hurl themselves off cliffs after a screening of Ek Duuje Ke Liye, a section of society likes to point a finger at cinema. They ignore the millions who saw these films and went back home and woke up the next morning and sent children to school and packed their lunches and went to work. They focus, instead, on the few who viewed these films as a how-to manual to fix their problematic existence. The reason is easy to guess. It’s simpler to blame a movie than try to address the complex calculations that result in an individual’s descent into momentary madness. No detective will hold the trigger responsible for the corpse in the living room, and yet, we routinely write about films as a cause – if not the cause – for social rot, as if cinema were an assiduous weevil gnawing away at the roots of our modern-day lives.
But have you noticed that it’s never the other way around? Shankar’s Mudhalvan, for instance, exhorted decency in public behaviour. The film was a massive hit – there wasn’t a single news report about how we’d changed as a result. In other words, we all went and saw the movie and went back to our lives. The most damning case is possibly that of Amitabh Bachchan gunning down a corrupt cabinet at the end of Inquilaab, a scenario that doubtless many of us have imagined in our most frustrated moments. Yet, in the following days, no lone ranger was seen ducking into the Parliament with an AK-47. Films like Taare Zameen Par and Black foster topical op-ed pieces and television debates about the disabilities in question, but when was the last time you heard of someone who took five minutes off his early-morning dash to work to help a blind man across the street?
If cinema cannot be found to encourage positive behaviours, then why should we blame films for depicting (and presumably engendering) negative attitudes? The most laughable attempt at saving us from cinema, in recent times, has to be the admonitory scrolls that pop up during scenes of smoking and drinking. And why is it always cinema? In our age, it is certainly because movies are our mass medium, consumed by millions. But what about earlier eras, whose pop culture assumed different forms? Does anyone believe that, in nineteenth-century London, hordes of fans of Dickens threw themselves into rehabilitating orphans and rediscovering the spirit of Christmas? If they could separate truth from fiction, shouldn’t we be able to do the same? It’s always art that mirrors life. And if we are to worry about life imitating art, we should be discussing not just these occasional examples of deranged gunmen but also those numerous women who wrote Rajesh Khanna letters with their blood.
The latter occurrence, strangely, is seen as a charming footnote in a saga of monumental star power, but not one person questioned (or expressed concern about) the alarming inability of these women to emerge from a fevered and fanciful existence where a stranger on screen, however entrancing, was worth inflicting physical harm over. It is one thing to style yourself after a creator of popular culture – a movie star, say, or a musician – and follow their work and worship them from afar, but when things get out of hand, the problem is always with the individual who has lost touch with reality. As much as the shooting in Colorado invites reflection and analysis, it would be too easy to blame a movie about a joyless superhero with pointy ears as the reason so many families have been irretrievably broken. The Dark Knight Rises may be the summer’s grandest entertainment. It may be the year’s biggest blockbuster. It’s also just a movie.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2012 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
MumbaiRamki
July 24, 2012
The interesting aspect i see , in almost such events, the killer/person who inflicts the damage ‘says’ that he was inspired by the movies. Its not just ‘we’ who say that.
There is a reason why American society of Paediatrics suggest to avoid movies for kids below 4 years . It is based on solid research of how the kids see the movies and how unedited it goes into the brain – Some adults are no different- as far as the person is unable to differentiate movies from real life , they will be triggers. But are movies to blame ? They do inspire the level of violence but i don’t think they are the cause for it .
And Regarding positiive behaviours, Mudhalavan is a wrong example and I wonder how you missed the Dhinakaran paper in 90s with many people stating that they started having a good family life after watching some of the Rajkiran movies and also ‘Yejaman’
Other aspect is we tend to bis our opinion based on what is familiar to us – i.e incidents or point of view that is discussed often, appears in news column . So when incidents like what happened in colarado is discussed often, we tend to think as the one perspective that towers all- just iike the argument that when sachin hits a 100 INDIA loses.
LikeLike
nitin shah
July 24, 2012
could you post the dark knight rises review.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 24, 2012
It is also the fact that politics play right into it. However sickened the yanks are by the killing, and there are plenty of them who are sickened by it, any talk of gun regulation will draw the epithet ‘liberal’ – which is possibly the worse insult one can think of, in public life today. TV hosts will talk of the second amendment, the right to bear arms, and conveniently forget that the right to bear arms is only if those arms are part of a citizen militia. This must be the only country where you cannot buy a car without a background check, but you can go into a retail store and walk out with a weapon.
Yes, I’m a hated liberal – so shoot me!
LikeLike
hari
July 24, 2012
A billion plus nation surely does have serial killers but the authorities just don’t know about them.
LikeLike
srivi84
July 24, 2012
In my pov I think decency in public behaviour was advocated in Shankar’s Anniyan, while Mudhalvan had more to do with behaviour in public life (not sure if that is what you meant)
On a different note, Cocktail review, Naan Ee review, Rajesh Khanna obit…. which one is coming first?
LikeLike
Ganesh
July 24, 2012
Dear Rangan,
Im not sure if it is possible to exactly equate doing good and doing bad, the same way. Doing good is not a one time act isnt it ? There might be that one odd guy who actually turned to a much better human watching a movie. But, isnt it normal to gauge one by ‘the mistake once committed’ rather than ‘until when the mistake has been committed’ ? Didnt many Rajnikanth fans from the labor sections of the society not cheer happily every time he got the better off a baddie, who typically exploited the poor or the innocent ? And probably accept that 0.1% of all his fans that do any good for the society may hav been truly inspired by him (on/off screen) ?
As in the movie Matrix, in most cases “one has already made the choice, its only the justification that he/she is looking for” … and movies and movie stars could end up being that catalyst after all …. but that is with any successful medium isnt it ?
Its totally another issue to argue on whether or not any art form can exist, if one starts the blame game, but every art form will inspire – whether for good or for bad …
What do you feel ?
LikeLike
Niranjan
July 24, 2012
You had a version of this after the ‘Agneepath’ boy spoke of his ‘inspiration’. What/why did you pen another one on virtually the same lines (not that I’m complaining 🙂 )?
LikeLike
but naagar?
July 24, 2012
Aiyya! Rangan avargale!! This halfbaked political commentator role – not your cup of tea. For if gunfire sprees are a unique american phenomenon, then packing steel tiffin boxes with curdrice sambar is uniquely indian phenomenon no? The sheer number of infy wiprosys checkshirt oilcombed hair techies walking down wall st with the dangling lunch box dripping more kozhambu on the sidewalks is perhaps what turns the exasperated american to a life of
ammunition weaponry no?
Let us just talk movie reviews yeah? Juvenile opeds even i can do and i am no doctor rangan.
So how is the movie? Must watch notwatch? Solli tholaiyum.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
July 24, 2012
Nice write-up. US is filled with loonies. Why can’t they regulate the sale of guns there?
LikeLike
Birendra K Singh (@bksingh2009)
July 24, 2012
Said like a true movie fan.
According to me, movies dont inspire anybody and even if it did its the individual fault entirely. If I take up smoking or drinking or killing just because my favorite actor did the same on screen, I should be labelled a dumb human being.
Movies never inspire the “what you want to do”. It might refine your “How you want to do it”. But what you want to do is already been decided by the person concerned. For ex: if tomorrow I want to commit suicide, I might do it the way it was done in Thelma and Louise. But even after having watched Thelma and Louise multiple times, I have never been inspired to commit suicide.
Morons are those who believe that cinema can bring about change or inspire someone to become violent. The raison d’etre of any cinema is to entertain. And The Dark Knight Trilogy is just that. However great it might be.
LikeLike
Birendra K Singh (@bksingh2009)
July 24, 2012
I would however, disagree with you observation on number of serial killers across various countries. I think US has been able to successfully solve its murder mysteries and nail down serial killers – hence they have a large number of recorded serial killers. I dont think, India should be far behind if we manage to nail down such people
LikeLike
Anushil Gupta
July 25, 2012
one of the better written ones i read here. an increasingly becoming rare is sanity today. and you hit the bulls eye with this. Though what irks me is, howsoever cogently/artfully you (me or anybody else) write about such mass delusions, these are things that go without saying. but they don’t, not anymore in our world today(fanned, shaped and ultimately controlled by the powers that be, mass/virtual media). It is very depressing. they should, they should 😦
Well written mate 🙂
LikeLike
omfgitsrohit
July 25, 2012
In this day and age, everyone needs to visit a shrink.
LikeLike
brangan
July 25, 2012
Email feedback…
——
OPED-entry 24/7
Inbox
x
Guru Prasad
11:46 AM (19 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Hi,
First of all, i need to tell you that i really enjoyed the OPED that you have written.
Now for my introduction. My name is Guru Prasad. I am a Civil Servant who cleared the exams with Psychology as one of my optional. It is always intriguing to read and study human behavior. The recent incident @ Denver has caught me by surprise.
There are many studies done in an attempt to study human behavior in the field of psychology to name a few the famous Bobo doll experiment (which included media and its impact), the famous prison experiment by phillip zimbardo…
There were certain attributes earlier (before social media, gaming came) like attitudes, power hungry? however now it is about “Alter Ego”. Although a profile in any social media site might include the information of the same person, i am convinced today that the same person when posting entries will try to be somebody else.
Now my point. You could have mentioned about this effect of Alter Ego….just a suggestion.
—–
PERSONAL – congratulations
Inbox
x
12:20 PM (19 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
– PERSONAL –
Dear Baradwaj (if I may),
Many, many congratulations on your Op-Ed piece today, on cinema and society. Thoughtful and timely. As a Hollywood nut and a keen reader of your columns I was pleased that you said what needed to be said, so well and in time. Let’s hope for the good of “good” cinema that saner voices always prevail over the din.
Best wishes
Rudy Fernandez
Head, Press & Public Affairs
British Deputy High Commission, Chennai
—–
Regarding your article
Inbox
x
Tarun T
1:37 PM (17 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Sir, your article “The Mirror behind the screen” in The Hindu is excellent. I enjoyed reading it.
—–
Article on the Op-Ed page
Inbox
x
Priyansh R
2:02 PM (17 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Sir,
I’m a sports reporter at The Hindu in Chennai. I read your article this morning in today’s issue. Though I was largely in agreement with your views, I would like to know your views on this article recently published on The New Yorker’s website.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/07/the-massacre-in-aurora-can-you-blame-the-movies.html
Regards,
Priyansh
—–
the rising of the badman
Inbox
x
Anuradha Shyam
2:04 PM (17 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Dear Mr.Rangan,
Your article on the “mirror behind the screen” eloquently captures many cinema lovers thoughts on the recent attribution of any deadly sin on the medium of cinema.It is true that while cinema is a persuasive medium, that it acts as a trigger for copycat crimes is farfetched.There are a whole host of factors that lead to someone going over the edge with violence.
The choice to watch and then respond wisely(some become movie critics!)or otherwise is in the hands of majority of us cinemagoers.The poignant fact though is that for those who have lost loved ones in this senseless killing,this blockbuster is not just a movie.
Regards,
Anamika
—–
(no subject)
Inbox
x
Kartik Kurup
7:05 PM (12 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Respected Sir,
Today I happen to read your article titled: “The mirror behind the screen”.
All I want to say is that I really enjoyed reading it and found it highly sensible for not criticizing movies when they are not given credits in the first place!
Regards,
Kartik
—–
opinion regarding your article in The Hindu dated 24-07-12
Inbox
x
jerry gabriel
7:05 PM (12 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Sir, I want to congratulate you on your article ‘The mirror behind the screen’. I think its an excellent work and after reading it i have no option but to agree to your views.The article is also beautifully constructed.A line in it which has become my favourite is’ …..the alarming inability of women……physical harm over’. Looking forward to reading more such articles from you.
Jerry Gabriel John
Final Year MBBS,
Govt. Medical College,
Kottayam, Kerala.
—–
On of the best..
Inbox
x
Neethu
7:07 PM (12 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
‘The mirror behind the screen'(Jul 24, 2012, The Hindu) Your words reflected our thoughts on the issue.
Sent from my Nokia phone
—–
Reg-The mirror behind the screen
Inbox
x
Pradeeshkumar K V
1:36 AM (5 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Dear Mr. Baradwaj,
Thanks for the interesting and thought provoking article. I have thought on the same topic too. What I think happens is that while cinema does not drastically change a behavior, it enhances a particular disposition in at least certain people. I was wondering while discussing with my friend today that why should Sunny Leone be cast in Jism 2 when her marketing potential lies in she being a porn star? Isnt the movie appealing to the baser instincts of the viewers? While it could be said that as audience we can choose not to watch the movie, how many will be there who will exercise that option? Many will go to watch the movie to just see Sunny in whatever less dress she can have in the movie. It can be argued still that it should not have an impact on behavior of the audiences. But what if the audience stereotypes what he sees? What if he begins to think the girls who are wearing a modern outfit could have the characteristics of a person seen on screen?
I think a movie may not be an issue when it makes a person think rather than appeal to his/her more baser or deeper emotions.
Just few thoughts
Thanks again,
Pradeesh
—–
Darpan Sachdeva
8:16 AM (2 hours ago)
to baradwaj.r
Dear Mr. Baradwaj,
I wholly cherished the moments spent reading your wonderfully put together article in today’s copy of The Hindu.
We never blame ourselves for the actions we take, instead we are always on the lookout for a scapegoat for our behaviour, attitude, and actions.
Just like blaming alcohol for people driving under influence and causing mayhem on the roads.
Thank you for penning a very insightful article.
Cheers,
Darpan
—–
prateek mittal
8:25 AM (1 hour ago)
to baradwaj.r
Hello,
I read your article regarding movies and the interpretation derived by us titled “The mirror behind the screen” in The Hindu. And i would like to point to you that although your point is quite right when you consider the cases of just one person out of millions interpreting the movie in a wrong fashion and ends up being a mass murder of which Colorado incident is an evidence. But at the same time, a movie is made for the general public, well there may be people like you and me who can control their frustrating moments as you mentioned in your article. But there are a few innocent creatures who are so enthralled by a movie or are so affected by a particular scene that they find nothing wrong in actually living the fantasy of frustration world.
Consider this for a fact that adults do not get too influenced by watching a movie and don’t let themselves get carried away, but the kids have to have endless imagination. How well is the rating system in India actually being followed? If a 17 year old guy comes to the ticket counter for movie tickets to an adult movie in a multiplex, he is not asked for any kind of certificate about his age. Or those movies where kids are not allowed to watch the movie without an adult, no one asks if any adult was accompanying them to the theater to watch the movie with them. The blame is either on the movie or the government machinery at work that allows ineligible people to watch a particular movie.
A tangible solution may be to control ‘these’ special kind of people and restrict them from watching any movie as they are so influenced by it. But wait a second wasn’t the whole point of making a movie to impact and influence someone’s thinking. I agree to the point that a movie is not the only thing to blame for the people falling prey to the imagination of the director. But you cannot expect much out of movies made solely for the commercial purpose and having no responsibility.
With warm Regards,
Prateek Mittal
Final year Undergraduate
IIT Kanpur
9889527127
Hall-1, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, UP
—–
Respected sir,
Your article, in The Hindu, (dated on July 24 2012,”The mirror Behind The Screen”) on the ‘Cinema and an individuals decency’ is an eye-opening and gives break to a traditional thoughts on negativity of Cinema. It leads to an individual to think from psycho-social aspects. I am very thankful to the writers like you, who, indirectly provides wonderful information, through which, reader like us will be able to develop analytical and rational thinking with both positive-negative aspect.
I also expect in future that readers like me will get delightful treat to the rusted mind.
All the best!
Regards
Miss. Priya Pawar
Pune-411052
—–
One of the finest pieces of writing in a long time -Mirror behind Screen
Inbox
x
Saldanha, Richard
8:50 AM (1 hour ago)
to baradwaj.r, rbsaldan
Dear Mr Rangan
A terrific article defining the underlying flawed society we live in : keep shaping opinion and maybe there will be an awakening
Best wishes
Richard B Saldanha
Message abbreviated in style and format because:
Sent using BlackBerry
—–
Ramana
9:07 AM (1 hour ago)
to baradwaj.r
Dear Mr Rangan:
I have just read your piece “The mirror behind the screen” in today’s The Hindu.
Regarding your argument on why we do not hold cinema responsible for the good in society, and how only the bad can be said to influence the human mind, my humble answer is: the human mind is easily attracted to the bad, not the good. Too simple.
For example, it is almost a self-evident fact that teenagers get their first love inputs from films, books, TV, from conversations they heard, etc. Why do not all children and teenagers pick up the good and serious from the same sources or from the conversations of elders? Simple, the human mind is inherently wired to be attracted to indriya gratification, not the mind’s elevation. Why did Adam bite the forbidden apple? Why did he not listen to the injunction?
Regarding your argument that why a film like Inquilaab did not spawn real-life shootings in Parliament, the simple answer would be: not every portrayal necessarily leads to a real-life enactment. The reasons are many, such as the feasibility of undertaking such an act, the real worth of it for the individual, the cost-benefit analysis etc.
(posting the same on Comments)
Regards,
Ramana
—–
A Request
Inbox
x
Danish Pruthi
9:26 AM (53 minutes ago)
to baradwaj.r
Sir
This email concers an article in todays The Hindu’s OP-ED page namely “The mirror behind the screen”. First of all its a very well written and a thought provoking article. From the begining to the very last line,that the dark knight rises is just a movie afterall, it makes the reader introspect about his views and his reflections from the cinema. It was fun reading and thinking altogether. I would like to co-relate one thing very closely to it, that is how we interpret our meetings with our seniors or the ones whom we think have achieved more. Here as well due to aura of that particular person, our own reasoning is clouded. We simply think that what worked for him will work for us as well. And the worst aspect of it is that we tend to imatate things like dressing style,communicating style and even hobbies as it is. This is very similar in comparison to cinemas as well where we want to be like the actor, but we hardly delve into things like the dedication or the effort that the actor has put in. My concern is largely for the students as for them appropriate motivation and inspiration makes more sense. Infact in the case of students the motivation providers and their mentors are generally their seniors who are themselves not properly motivated or they themselves are superficially motivated by the people they come across.So its my humble request that you try to bring out this aspect in your coming articles.
Regards
Danish
A student from BITS PILANI
—–
LikeLike
vijay
July 25, 2012
This is evolving as another one of your pet themes – this defending cinema against accusation of provoking crimes. Maybe the second or third time I read about this here(maybe you talked about this earlier in the comments space rather than in an article, I dont remember). The pettest theme is of course about why there is no such thing as overanalysis 🙂
LikeLike
vijay
July 25, 2012
BR, I am wondering at to why you wrote this piece now. Has there been some sort of ourtage against TDKR the movie after these killings? I thought no.The overall response, if anything, has been more critical of the gun laws there than the movie itself. You seem to have written a pre-emptive defense for cinema
LikeLike
vpjaiganesh
July 25, 2012
Nice write up – but one must give some thought about a character like Joker – who according to Chris Nolan is someone who simply ‘likes to see the world burn’. Fiction he might be – but the pressures of a society that leaves young men on their own with no guidance – and extremely punishing setup push them to find some kind of identification with such characters – As creators every film maker has the responsibility to underline the ‘evil’ – while adding necessary flamboyance to the antagonist to make the movie entertaining. This is one aspect where I found the Tim Burton’s joker to be just right – quite funny and charismatic at the same time clearly marked as ‘evil’ and not to be sympathised with. Nolan’s ultimate triumph in making an enigmatic Joker – also becomes a sad foot note in history with Heath Ledger’s death and now an unimaginably tragic spinoff years later ending in more bloodshed.
LikeLike
Chhote saab
July 25, 2012
This is a discussion which is going to go on as long as movies are made. ‘Dark Knight Rises’ is just a movie and that is a fact but it is also true , as one of the emails said, that life is never going to be same for the family of the victims. I agree to an extent that this seems like an American phenomenon and gun control (or lack of ) is a very big part of it.
I am a big fan of movies in general and even though I feel that people who snap and go on a killing spree need an excuse/reason and if not a particular movie, they would find some other trigger/catalyst to do this, I also feel that movies (and especially video games) are pushing the envelope as far as violence and villainy is concerned. While adults cannot be stopped from watching (and playing) whatever they want, kids should definitely not be allowed to watch and play violent movies and games. The responsibility of that lies mainly with parents and their ability and eagerness to lay down strict guidelines for their children as to what is acceptable and not. Broken homes, single parents ( and the psychological trauma associated) and violent movies/games are a sureshot recipe for senseless violence in society. I think blaming the movie for a particular incident is stupid, it was going to happen anyways. It needs to be addressed by taking a step back and taking a more enveloping wide view of the world/society. I’m not too sure if the leaders/politicians are interested in addressing it. As everything else, it needs to start as a people’s revolution.
Two movies which I thought affected the people positively, albeit for a short while, were ‘Rang De Basanti’ with it’s candlewalk protests and ‘Lage Raho Munnabhai’ with its gandhigiri. What do you think?
LikeLike
vishal yogi
July 25, 2012
But it is a fact that smoking and drinking on screen does play its role in high school students taking up the addictions. And the same applies to casual sex.
As an example, I browse tons of american literature for children and teens – and it is a given that in the book reviews on amazon, 99% will applaud on the positives – while the lone dissenter will point out the depiction of sexuality in books meant for 11 or 12 year olds.
No wonder american teenagers are promiscuous. India is following suit.
Sex education might be embarrassing for most when it comes to young kids, so the adult certification in movies for that aspect is reasonable.
Though, education about the perils of smoking/drinking/violence could and should be the parents’ responsibility – no age barrier there.
LikeLike
Karthi
July 25, 2012
Interestingly, american media is debating about gun culture that is unque to them not about regulating films!
LikeLike
tenalimanomay
July 26, 2012
What about incidents of ‘gandhigiri’ after Lage Raho Munnabhai. That’s a reverse positive influence.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/keyword/gandhigiri
LikeLike
raj
July 26, 2012
I like how Priyansh introduced himself to you in the comment space of your column as “Sir I work as Sports Reporter in THE HINDU, Chennai”.
LikeLike
Rahul
July 27, 2012
Just wanted to share this with you – A rare find.
Kissa Kursee Kaa from 1978. I was under the impression that all its prints had been destroyed.
LikeLike
venkatesh
July 27, 2012
Rahul : brilliant.
LikeLike
brangan
July 27, 2012
An interesting link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120717162743.htm
Plus another email:
YRREDD
Jul 26 (1 day ago)
Sir,
Mr.Baradwaj Rangan’s analysis on the influence of cinema on the society in “The mirror behind the Screen” (The Hindu, dt. July 24) was indeed incisive. Cinema is only one medium of entertainment and it is for us, the viewers, to always remember that reality is different. Rangan has hit the nail on its head when he says “we routinely write about films as a cause – if not the cause – for social rot, as if cinema were an assiduous weevil gnawing away at the roots of our modern-day lives”. Even if one links the bizarre incidents such as the one in Colorado to the influence of “Dark Knight Rises”, no causal linkage can be established for the more gruesome shoot out in Virginia Tech, USA, where 34 people lost their lives, a couple of years ago. Exceptions are there in every sphere of life and a few grotesque incidents should not make us condemn movies in general.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Raghuram Reddy
LikeLike
Bala
July 27, 2012
@Rahul: thanks for the great find! Might be a good idea to download it before it gets taken down.
LikeLike