If you found it difficult to believe Saif Ali Khan, in Cocktail, as a software engineer, wait till you see Salman Khan in Ek Tha Tiger. He’s a RAW agent who slings a satchel across his pumped-up torso, trying to pass for a writer. The closest he’s come to literature is probably while lifting a copy of War and Peace every morning, a hundred reps per hand, but even to maintain appearances we don’t see him bent over a laptop or lost in faraway thought. He calls himself a writer. So he’s one. Kabir Khan’s new film is that kind of movie, where nothing and no one are to be taken seriously – though the director does his darnedest to make us think there’s something really at stake: the nation’s safety, for instance, and the safety of the men and women who dedicate themselves to this noble cause. We are asked to endure chatter about RAW and ISI, about India and Pakistan and anti-missile technology, about hard-nosed duty coming in the way of an emotionally nurturing personal life – and at least for a while, we are left with the impression that this is going to be more than just a big, dumb star vehicle.
Ek Tha Tiger has a doozy of a concept. What if James Bond fell in love and no longer wanted to be James Bond? What if, for the first time in his life, he heeded not his instincts and reflexes but the stirrings of his heart? What if he lost sight of his mission (in this case, tracking a suspicious academic played by Roshan Seth), lost interest in it, and yearned for a life of utter ordinariness? Can double-o-seven scale himself back to a mere o? Can a hero, in other words, become a zero? This is the opposite of commercial action-oriented storytelling, where we usually settle down for the stories of people who strive to be something, in those “birth of” movies. This is a “death of” movie – though the thing that dies first is this concept. We realise the end is near when we get a stretch that centers on the hero’s full bladder. (It ends with his relief behind bushes.) And we know it’s business as usual.
The problem isn’t the series of silly contrivances. When Tiger (Salman Khan) and Zoya (Katrina Kaif) flee to another country and they’re caught, there, on camera, their first impulse isn’t to run away to someplace safe but to sit down in front of a piece of street entertainment in full public view. And unlike other shadowy people on the run, they keep their money in a bank. These details aren’t important – and perhaps Tiger and Zoya really meant to erase their pasts and settle down in this new country. (Mercifully, we’re spared the scene where they stand in line for a PAN card.) After all, they’re in love, madly so – and we know this because Zoya tells us, “Jis mohabbat mein deewangi na ho, woh mohabbat hai nahin.” (Of course, the way Kaif delivers this impassioned line she could be in school rattling off a multiplication table.) And if this love story had been narrated convincingly, we wouldn’t be complaining about anything else.
This is meant to be a love so monumental that Tiger, who opens the film by shooting down about a dozen men on his tail, makes a conscious effort, by the end, to not kill anyone. Love has transformed him. It has tamed this tiger. But who’d come to watch a Salman Khan movie where he ends up defanged, and getting a lot of an entirely different kind of action? To treat Ek Tha Tiger as an adult movie, we needed more scenes like the one where Tiger, having been betrayed, pours his rage into strangling an enemy. But that emotion is extinguished like one of the numerous cigarette stubs in the den of a villain – their appearance prompts the hero to impart an anti-smoking message, apparently to his young fans. The film seems to be made for the young-at-heart – there’s no heat in the romance, no sex, and there’s no bloodlust in the action. It’s cartoon love, cartoon violence. It’s safe. You can take the kids along. Even the title resembles one of those ek tha raja stories you’d tell the young ones. The film should have been called Ek Tha Tigger.
Copyright ©2012 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
rameshram
August 23, 2012
the film was just a two hour prelude to mashallah …which was the point..
LikeLike
Mohit
August 23, 2012
Considering how the movie de-superstarifies Salman – him actually getting fooled and tricked; the one-liners he throws to impress the girl being promptly used to take a playful dig at him; and the whole idea of “Kya hum jasooson ki zindagi nahin hoti?” bit etc. in short Salman being at his most anti-Salman, shouldn’t this movie have been simply called ‘Being Human’? 🙂
LikeLike
SR
August 23, 2012
Mr Khan’s target audience comprises of those who think ‘A Farewell to Arms’ is a workout manual; RAW agent, indeed -just look at the above picture of him dancing. He’s more a kitty-synonym than any other feline.
LikeLike
sachita
August 23, 2012
“(Of course, the way Kaif delivers this impassioned line she could be in school rattling off a multiplication table.)” 🙂
Yet she is the one with hit after hit…. .. we are going to see two more high profile monstrosity from her – though dhoom3 wouldnt require have to do much i am pretty sure she would disappoint there too)
LikeLike
Bunny
August 23, 2012
“He’s a RAW agent who slings a satchel across his pumped-up torso, trying to pass for a writer. The closest he’s come to literature is probably by lifting a copy of War and Peace every morning, a hundred reps with each hand…”
ROFL. Bravo.
LikeLike
pseudo-grammarnazi
August 23, 2012
Sorry to nitpick – but who knew you are human when it comes to grammatical errors 🙂 – “and we knows”? or is this intentional 😉
LikeLike
brangan
August 23, 2012
Mohit: But in the overall scheme, I felt he was pretty much doing what he does every time. The jokes. The action. The romance. The whole “I don’t take myself too seriously” bit. That, in a sense, is what a star does, no?
sachita: She’s really very bad here. But good for us as a nation if she’s the topmost actress in town 🙂
pseudo-grammarnazi: haha! Now that I don’t have all that much time to obsess over my blog-only posts, I’m sure you’ll find many such things. What’s changed is that instead of shaping the piece to the fullest (edits, rewrites, etc.) and then putting it up, I put up a decent-enough draft and then keep revising it. So don’t be surprised if some words change here and there — like “we knows” 🙂
LikeLike
KayKay
August 23, 2012
“The closest he’s come to literature is probably by lifting a copy of War and Peace every morning, a hundred reps with each hand”
Mwahahahaha….that’s my laugh out loud line of the day 🙂
Well…if we were asked to buy Denise Richards as a Nuclear Physicist…..
LikeLike
KayKay
August 23, 2012
“To treat Ek Tha Tiger as an adult movie”….we’d need Sunny Leone 🙂
Then you could tweak your post heading and we’d have a bona-fide title for a skin-flick:
“Ek Tha Tiger”: The spy who *ucked me into bed
LikeLike
pseudo-grammarnazi
August 23, 2012
KayKay – should it not be “in the” rather than “into”
LikeLike
Fatema
August 23, 2012
Totally insipid film yeah, and probably the only good thing about it was that (for a while only, I’m sure) it takes attention away from Bhai-porn.
What caught my attention though, was how the meaning of ‘hero’ has changed with our times. Of course, populism has everything to do with it. When Tiger is confronted with a choice between nation and love I was all set for the usual tug-of-war of the soul with Tiger choosing nation over everything else until the love falls into his lap for that expected happy ending because haven’t we always watched that loyalty to the nation comes first? Something we’d see in films of the Amitabh Bachchan or heck even in the Dilip Kumar era. In fact we haven’t seen anything else ever. What I wasn’t ready to watch was the irrelevance relegated to the inherent ideal of patriotism and that too simply because it is supposed to be a massy love story. The rationale that rang loud in my mind, something I’m sure the writer-producers-director would themselves have thrown at me (and it has happened in real life too) was, ‘no one wants to watch films that preach of higher ideals’. I agree, the ‘masses’ don’t want to waste their time on looking upto heroes who uphold the higher ideals anymore. What surprised me was how ok it was to sacrifice the entire notion of national loyalty and flippantly so (I think the flippancy was my main problem). Just signs of changing times. In that sense Ek Tha Tiger was as much Bhai-porn as Wanted or Bodyguard.
LikeLike
srivi84
August 23, 2012
DIGRESSION ALERT:
Have you any plans to write about Attakathi – you said “something (in the trailer) is what makes us want to watch the film, bask in its vibe.” some time ago.
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
August 23, 2012
In that case, should it not be “on the”? Unless they unzipped the mattress and had hot, sweaty, claustrophobic sex IN the bed.
Honestly though, I think KayKay meant he *ucked her INTO the bed. As in took her and mashed her against the… well… never mind.
LikeLike
vikram
August 23, 2012
“Ek tha Tigger” 🙂 🙂 that was excellent
LikeLike
KayKay
August 24, 2012
No…Then it would be The Spy Who *ucked Me On The Bed (as opposed to say, on top of the washing machine in full spin mode).
You could technically get *ucked into bed, if you started someplace else (like the couch in the living room, 40 minutes into the new Sasha Grey film called “Lawrence Of My Labia”).
Damn, these scintillating discussions where grammar and film collide is exhilarating, no?
LikeLike
rameshram
August 24, 2012
new rule:(bill maher style) people who WRITE about sex should have actually DONE it somewhat skillfully a couple of times before they get to say stuff.
LikeLike
Deepti
August 24, 2012
Agree with your assessment of the romance – it’s just not epic enough. This is after all “the” Salman Khan – the Dabangg dude. For him to give it all up, the love story had better be as heroic as the action. Instead we have a lot of twee stuff about mispronounciation of ‘tangri kebab” – more suited to a pimply teenage boy than an action star.
Films like Wanted and Dabangg acknowledged and celebrated the fact that Salman Khan the star is a bigger and more real force than Salman’s character in their films. ETT seems to ignore this.. except for the single scene with Salman and the doodhwala. Why use the guy at all?
LikeLike
KayKay
August 24, 2012
So speaketh the fat virgin living in his mom’s basement….
LikeLike
Mambazha Manidhan
August 24, 2012
My biggest WTF moment was seeing Salman Khan’s Stunt Double in all his glory especially in the opening Action sequence, as if Salman Khan didn’t even bother to show up for the shots that required even the slightest of physical exertion. Looks like Bhai gave his call sheet only for Dialogue scenes. And, it’s not like anyone cares anyway. Did this bother you?
On the other hand, I thought the stunts involving Katrina Kaif (or her double) were well-staged.
LikeLike
KayKay
August 25, 2012
“My biggest WTF moment was seeing Salman Khan’s Stunt Double in all his glory especially in the opening Action sequence, as if Salman Khan didn’t even bother to show up for the shots that required even the slightest of physical exertion”
Mango Man, I guess that makes Sallu B’Wood’s answer to Steven Seagal 🙂
LikeLike
aneek
August 25, 2012
@kaykay i thought steven seagal did his own stunts.he claimed to have learned some japanese martial art?is he fake?
LikeLike
Arif Attar
August 26, 2012
Just seen the movie and my first reaction was, with a plot like that the film could have been more raw..a bit more passion. I mean compare the song where they are shown enjoying their honeymoon period in Cuba after escaping with the sequence in Scott’s Revenge with Madeleine Stowe and Kevin Costner with Kinky’s Mas playing in the background.
LikeLike
KayKay
August 27, 2012
Steven Seagal IS an aikido exponent and a pretty good one. In the early days of his career, when his films still had theatrical runs, and the man was a 100 pounds lighter, he DID do all of his own fights. Nowadays. he resembles a beached whale, cranks out a dozen direct-to-video titles like Today You Die and Out For A Kill and only bothers to execute his aikido motions when close-ups are required. Rest of the time, it’s a double executing the more strenuous moves (running, jumping, rolling etc).
LikeLike
KayKay
August 27, 2012
Wow! Am pleased as punch somebody still remembers Revenge. An ignominous flop for Costner that required an epic like Dances With Wolves to pull his career out of a tailspin. I loved it though, and Madeleine Stowe was…mmmmmmm….fine! Although replicating any of it’s steamy love scenes onto a Sallu starrer would be the equivalent of Tyler Durden splicing a penis shot onto a kiddie cartoon. May make for an interesting night out at the movies, but tonally and contextually inappropriate 🙂
LikeLike
rameshram
August 31, 2012
I’ll have whatever kay kay is smoking.
LikeLike
vishal
September 14, 2012
well well…i am not sure if the blog was ever required. I mean, Salman Kahan movie does not need any critic or review, because when he makes films, he has only one thing in mind…….entertainment…..i mean, there was no point of this blog because non of his movies has any sense to it, but they do good……..i like a good laugh every now and then…even my 2 year old kid likes his songs……..on the other side too harsh on Katrina….she does not know acting..how do u expect a good dialoug delivery………….comon man………..
i am looking forward for you blog on Burfii……..that would make sense though 🙂
LikeLike