Silly comedies are common. These are the ones with PJs and slapstick, the kind of films before sitting down for which a certain kind of reviewer might advise us to “leave our brains at the door.” Nonsense comedies, however, are rarer – these are films where the audience has to be reasonably alert, tuning their antennae to a certain frequency, a certain vibe, and at least for a while, it seemed to me that Shirish Kunder was on to a solid nonsense comedy with Joker. The opening scene sets the tone. A British cartographer, circa 1946, is approaching the village of Paglapur, home to a famed mental asylum. He’s almost there when the car stops. He sees terrified men and women fleeing and, further ahead, burning buildings. Fearing for his life, he turns back, and thus, we learn, Paglapur was never acknowledged in the map of India – the village, cut off from the rest of the country, turns into a nutcase Shangri-La. The locals are stuck in a time warp, where an aircraft flying above sends them scurrying for cover, fearing bombardment by Hitler’s forces.
This is a most daft beginning, and the story gets weirder (in a good way) when we cut to Agastya (Akshay Kumar, who went by the same name in Kunder’s first feature, Jaan-e-Mann) sprawled out in front of the hi-tech contraptions in his home in the USA, awaiting signs of alien life. In these early portions, Kunder displays a genuine joy for making movies that are out to entertain a large audience. And he doesn’t go about it in a lazy and cynical fashion, like how a Sajid Khan does, tossing together a heap of actors and lighting a fire under their behinds. Kunder follows his heart, and what appears to be a real vision. He is an original. When Agastya lands in Paglapur – he was born in the village, and he returns with his girlfriend (Sonakshi Sinha) to see his dying father (a wonderfully loony Darshan Jariwala) – he meets a kid who hangs upside down, thinking he’s a lantern, and later, the villagers want to know why Agastya did not respond to their letters, never mind that the local post office has been closed for decades and the letters, therefore, never reached him in the first place.
As long as Joker is confined to Paglapur, it is so inspired and one-of-a-kind that I began to hope that we were in for that rarest of treats – a completely visionary mainstream comedy. But once Agastya steps outside and decides to bring progress to Paglapur – by drawing the media’s attention to crop circles and aliens in the village – the film goes kaput. From a nonsense comedy, we’re back in a routinely silly comedy, and worse, some sort of occasional satire about the government and the media. Late in the story, Agastya releases a magical-looking balloon into the air, in an attempt to convince hordes of photographers and heavily armed FBI agents (don’t ask!) that a UFO is ascending to the skies. And when a sceptic hurls a knife, the punctured balloon flops back to earth. This may well be a metaphor for the movie – some fifteen minutes of oddness and wonder, followed by a crash landing. Kunder is a daring dreamer of big concepts, but he needs to be a better director to flesh them out with sustained energy. Otherwise a nonsense comedy becomes just… nonsense.
Copyright ©2012 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Shankar
September 2, 2012
Baddy, how was the event? Can’t wait to hear your opinion…
LikeLike
Virginia Kelley
September 2, 2012
Glad to see someone else appreciating the high-level nonsense humor of this movie in its best moments – I found a lot in it to be delighted by, including, in the early scene, the British official in his Revolutionary War-era red coat and fifty-cent yellow wig – a nod to Mard, possibly.
Also the “Indian headdress” sported by a villager, and Shreyas’ made-up language.
LikeLike
rameshram
September 2, 2012
finally! someone on rangudu’s frequency 😀
LikeLike
fattiemama
September 2, 2012
Completely agree with you. It’s this nonsense kind of comedy we aren’t really used to watching but which are actually a pleasure. Andaz Apna Apna, Chashme-Badoor, even Jaaneman for that matter. Also, a few sequences were pretty imaginative, going by general Bollywood standards, quite liked the way the fake aliens were created. Funny, the same kinda thought (in humour and prodtn) gets applauses when Hollywood does it but gets boo-ed if we do it. Also, the subtle magical touch in the forest lighting and DI, the fire-fly lanterns was pleasing to the eye. But we will reject it as fake…
And for a change we had Akshay Kumar playing a character, sobre as we haven’t seen him in ages.
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
September 2, 2012
“Funny, the same kinda thought (in humour and prodtn) gets applauses when Hollywood does it but gets boo-ed if we do it. ”
Why would anyone do it? Do you mean to say the ticket-buying public public is more indulgent towards Hollywood? I would say it is the other way round. People have appreciated the absurd humour or of Delhi Belly, Pas Gaye Re Obama, Tere Bin Laden, which had some outrageous ideas at the core.
The only reason we don’t accept it is when it is badly done. I haven’t seen this one. But Jaan-e-Man was badly done and I wasn’t impressed. I appreciate the concepts that Kunder has. But he lacks the execution skills , both at the detailed script writing level as well in direction.
After all what could be more outlandish than the concept behind Lagaan.. But Aamir and Gowarikar pulled it off, and the people accepted it. People even accepted the black comedy of Peepli LIve.
God is always in the detail.
LikeLike
Fatema
September 3, 2012
“Do you mean to say the ticket-buying public public is more indulgent towards Hollywood? ”
Yes.
LikeLike
aneek
September 3, 2012
@Fatema ““Do you mean to say the ticket-buying public public is more indulgent towards Hollywood? ”
Yes”
no. no way. “koi mil gaya” was a super hit movie.dont tell me that “e.t.” would have made the same business if released simultaneously.forget about arthouse movies when was the last time even a hollywood blockbuster had fuelled the craze among “ticket buying public ” in india as much as its bollywood or regional counterpart.i remember only two “titanic” and “jurassic park”.internet and editorial praise doesnot really mirror indulgence of “ticket buying public”.
LikeLike
brangan
September 6, 2012
Virginia Kelley: Actually that redcoat was my favourite character. I wished they’d made the movie about him 🙂
LikeLike
vishal yogin
October 13, 2012
Forgot to comment here – I did see this one, and absolutely adored the humor. I was laughing so hard in parts that tears rolled down the eyes.
Most grownups frown on such juvenile humor and their usual reaction is getting irritated or perplexed, when I see something funny like this in real life.
I would have liked to see the film lampoon modern progress and development, besides the money-fixated modern economy that doesnt think twice before destroying natural resources.
But it didnt exactly achieve this, as much as I would have liked it to.
LikeLike
burcidibollyreview
November 6, 2012
If people expect something good from Shrish Kunder— that is the problem! It’s Shrish Kunder!
LikeLike
M.
May 6, 2015
BR: I happened to catch Joker on tv the other day and I don’t quite agree with you here – I found the movie pretty terrible from the word go (I mean yeah, there was lot of scope for whimsy and inspired lunacy but it never came out that way for me) but I’d actually say the exact same thing you say here about another Akshay Kumar starrer, “Entertainment” directed by Sajid-Farhad.
The first 20 minutes or so of Entertainment are exactly “…it is so inspired and one-of-a-kind that I began to hope that we were in for that rarest of treats – a completely visionary mainstream comedy.”
A hilarious scene involving black-and-white-to-color wipes to transition between flashback and present-time, a truly inspired turn by Krushna Abhishek who slips in movie stars’s names in usual conversations…
But then it just slips into the usual Anees Bazmee-Sajid Khan variety of comedy.
Seen it by any chance?
LikeLike