Dan Brown’s ‘Inferno’ is stuffed with clues, chases, chunks of general knowledge, and possibly an insight into why this author does what he does.
Midway through Dan Brown’s latest thriller, I began to wonder about the future adventures of Robert Langdon, the Harvard University professor with a penchant for scouring the European landscape for answers to maddeningly cryptic clues. At some point, having exhausted the Easter-egg possibilities of every city, building, statue and painting in the Continent, Brown is going to have to turn elsewhere – and why not India? Surely there’s a mystery waiting to be unraveled in the bowels of the Taj Mahal, where Langdon ends up after following leads embedded in (a) the dreadlocks of a recently deceased Naga Sadhu, (b) Anarkali’s expunged contribution to the Akbarnama, (c) the peeling plaster around the largest fresco in the Ajanta caves, (d) the latitude and longitude indicated in the waistline of a copulating couple in a Khajuraho temple, and (e) the runes revealed under the soot of the oldest griddle in Chandni Chowk’s Parathe Wali Gali.
Upon the souls of the Knights Templar, this is not an attempt to mock formula, which is the oxygen on which genre fiction thrives. Why expect something different from Dan Brown? After all, no one picks up a Mills & Boon paperback in anticipation of the scene where the long-awaited union of the lady of the manor and the gamekeeper is interrupted by a chainsaw-wielding psychopath. Inferno adheres closely to the rules laid out by The Da Vinci Code, which means we have Langdon and a good-looking female companion running from one European location to another, tracking clues and evading murderous men and women who belong to cult-like organisations. And like The Da Vinci Code, this stuff is made for the movies. The chapters are short, exciting, twist-riddled, and they always end with a climax. (“A searing bolt of pain traveled directly to Langdon’s head. He felt his eyes rolling back, and then everything went black.”) The pages turn themselves, thanks to a plot where religion and science collide in a manner as mysterious as Mona Lisa’s smile.
Unfortunately, these pages also turn themselves from tedium. Is there another novelist so unmindful of narrative momentum? Brown will set up a heart-pounding chase, and then stop to gawk at the scenery: “Istanbul’s three-hundred-year-old Spice Bazaar is one of the largest covered marketplaces in the world. Built in the shape of an L, the sprawling complex…” He’s perpetually torn between the contradictory impulses of the entertainer and the edifier – imagine Robert Ludlum possessed by the spirit of Wikipedia. We learn about the Medicis’ patronage of art, about cylinder seals invented by Sumerians, that Botticelli was “one of the true giants of the Italian Renaissance,” and that Venice is “a unique Italian water-world made up of hundreds of interconnected lagoons.” Langdon cannot cross the Swiss consulate without noting that its “concave, blue-glass façade resembles a futuristic monolith along the skyline.” It’s probably a blessing that Brown doesn’t write sex scenes, otherwise we’d encounter a passage like this: “Langdon crushed her lips with his and threw her on the bed. His eyes wandered to the 1200 thread count Egyptian cotton sateen sheets. Cotton is a soft, fluffy staple fiber that grows in a boll, or protective capsule, around the seeds of cotton plants of the genus Gossypium…”
There are formidable-looking charts and graphs that present information that could easily have been worked into a conversation, and even the heroine’s background, instead of being parceled out in phases, is revealed in a rush of expository detail. She’s her own little Wikipedia entry. If you’re an armchair psychoanalyst, you could treat yourself to a sleuthing session of your own, foraging Brown’s prose for insights into his obsession with facts and figures. Here’s a passage that suggests a theory:
“Where are we,?” Langdon finally demanded.
“This is my ship – The Mendacium.
“Mendacium?” Langdon asked. “As in… the Latin word for Pseudologos – the Greek god of deception?”
The man looked impressed. “Not many people know that.”
Langdon, therefore, is really a stand-in for Brown, and we, the readers are substitutes for the impressed man, the owner of The Mendacium, marveling at the author’s accumulation of information that “not many people know.”
We may be more impressed if he wrote better prose. You don’t move 200 million copies of your books by employing anything but the most utilitarian language, but surely all those readers deserve more diligent editing. Early on, describing Dante’s The Divine Comedy – the key to the happenings here – Brown writes, “Of [its] three sections – Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso – Inferno was by far the most widely read and memorable.” Later, a character says, “If you ever read The Divine Comedy, you’ll see Dante’s journey is divided into three parts – Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso.” Why the repetition? If the intent is to remind the reader, couldn’t the second instance have been less of an announcement? The name of a shrine is spelt, in the same paragraph, as “Hagia Sophia” and “Hagia Sofia.” And setting a scene, Brown writes, “A replica of Michelangelo’s David… stands in all his glory at the palazzo entrance.”When David refers to a statue, not a person, shouldn’t it be “its glory”? But Brown and his fans will probably label this as nitpicking, which is the act of removing the eggs of lice, generally head lice, from the host’s hair. As the nits are cemented to individual hairs, they cannot be removed with most combs…
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2013 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
bhavna
June 1, 2013
This was funny 😀
LikeLike
njaykrishnan
June 1, 2013
Initially i was surprised that you have written a book review.. but then on second thoughts it clarified.. reviewing Brown is reviewing a film no doubt. 😛 i always wonder how the things that Langdon says would fit into a day as in most of the cases..
LikeLike
Manreet S Someshwar (@manreetss)
June 1, 2013
Mystery to be unraveled in the bowels of Taj Mahal? Sorry, Brown’s too late – I have beaten him to it with The Taj Conspiracy 🙂 And yes, Brown’s readers love predictability delivered through utilitarian prose – clearly a winning combo though!
LikeLike
Anuja
June 1, 2013
Brown’s secret is that he is great at foreplay and few writers can build anticipation the way he does. Too bad his climaxes leave you high and dry! On that note it would be great to pick up a tome by one of India’s great masters of prose – Baradwaj Rangan on the veiled secrets hidden by erotic sculptures in Kajuraho. Come on BR! Show ’em how its done and if you move 3 million copies in the process, I won’t be in the least surprised 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
KayKay
June 1, 2013
Brown needn’t set his next book in India.
India has it’s own Dan Brown: Ashwin Sanghi
LikeLike
Vivek
June 1, 2013
hahaha, you should check this out http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/10049454/Dont-make-fun-of-renowned-Dan-Brown.html
LikeLike
chronophlogiston
June 2, 2013
One of your best reviews yet. Loved it!
LikeLike
brangan
June 2, 2013
Anuja: BR writing erotic fiction. I’m sure that will give rise to nipples… er. ripples of anticipation 🙂
Vivek: OMG, I died laughing. Thanks. “:…using the feet located at the ends of his two legs to propel him forwards.” Hahahaha!
LikeLike
Amrita
June 3, 2013
“….nitpicking, which is the act of removing the eggs of lice, generally head lice, from the host’s hair. As the nits are cemented to individual hairs, they cannot be removed with most combs…” LOL. great read!
KayKay stole the words from my mouth. Exactly what I was I was thinking as I read your first para. Sanghvi’s book came to me highly recommended but struck me as a even more ho-hum & direct (not in a good way) version of Dan Brown. Have you had a chance to read any of his books BR?
LikeLike
Pavithran
June 3, 2013
brangan sir, don’t you think for once dan brown has written a book that is relevant to our times? trying to throw some light on over population (the solution offered was crap),a problem that continues to haunt us and like he points out might lead to chaos? (i found it to be a good argument and was rather disappointed not many pointed it out)
LikeLike
Praveen
June 3, 2013
Would be great if you write more book reviews along with the movie reviews… And the link shared by Vivek was insanely funny.. 🙂
LikeLike
Anuja
June 3, 2013
Lol! BR, India’s answer to EL James!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jai
June 4, 2013
Great review…the only book I ever liked of Dan Brown’s was Angels & Demons…the rest I found extremely repetitive. By the way, any chance of you reviewing ‘Oath of the Vayuputras’? That’s one review I would love to read… 😉
LikeLike
Selvan
June 4, 2013
Usually I don’t agree with all of Mr. Rangan’s reviews. But, man, that was one of the best hilarious review I’ve ever read. Especially that piece on What-if-Brown-wrote-sex scene, I had to lit my ass on fire and stuff a gag down my throat to stop laughing. I wish someone would sent it to Mr. Brown himself.
LikeLike
Shankar
June 4, 2013
“imagine Robert Ludlum possessed by the spirit of Wikipedia”…Baddy, Not sure if it is true, but I have felt for some time that modern day writers, with the resources at their disposal today including the internet, have an easier time with research. Back in the days, a Ludlum or Forsyth might have spent years painstakingly researching topics, places etc and incorporated them into their story, making it more organic. With the information overload today, as you said, some of the scenery just stands out, without being part of the writing flow. Of course, some of it is a reflection on the skill of the writer as well.
LikeLike
brangan
June 5, 2013
Amrita: No, not read any Sanghvi.
Shankar: It’s the skill of the writer. Any basic writer knows that you can’t sump info like this in the middle of plot, and even if you do, you have to weave it into dialogue or something. This guy just gets away with murder 🙂
LikeLike
Jayanth
June 6, 2013
I don’t agree with Ludlum meets Wikipedia… He has always been a scene setter with lots of background info…
LikeLike
Jerina
June 9, 2013
What a hilarious review. Its been quite a while since I have read Dan Brown’s books and for perhaps the same reason you have written above. I have never paused to consider why he doesn’t impress like Ludlum or Forsyth 🙂
And totally agree with Shankar. I think there is no comparison.
LikeLike
KayKay
June 9, 2013
Dear Amrita, would just like to clarify that my comment about Ashvin Sanghi was in no way a diss of his books.
I was just making a point that if Dan Brown looks East for his next book to mine India’s vast treasure trove of historical, mythological and religious arcana, then Sanghi’s already there, and the truth is, I’ve found the latter’s The Rozabal Line and Chanakya’s Chant every bit as entertaining as Brown’s novels.
It’s pointless to quibble about the prose in these books. The late Michael Crichton’s books featured equally pedestrian writing and two-dimensional stick figures as characters. But Crichton was about High Concept whether it was about the perils of unchecked scientific progress or controversy-baiting topics.
Likewise, Brown is about concepts as well. Symbolism and religious conspiracies bundled up into a thriller format featuring just enough thrills and spills so that readers can kid themselves they’re NOT reading an author’s exhaustive research thesis. Brown, like Crichton, is that college professor who makes a lecture so interesting you forget that if someone gave you a bibliography of all the books from which he’s spinning such a compelling yarn and told you to head to the library to read up this shit by yourself, you’d crumple up that piece of paper and Michael Jordan it into the nearest waste basket.
I’m actually reading Sanghi’s latest The Krishna Key after which I’ll start Inferno. And then probably not touch a book of this sort for the next 6 months. They’re the equivalent of potato chips. Addictive as hell, but not recommended for consistent consumption.
LikeLike
Harish
July 9, 2013
Read this Inferno review!
http://harishsankar.blogspot.in/2013/07/inferno-personal-take.html
LikeLike
shail
August 9, 2014
Hilarious. ” It’s probably a blessing that Brown doesn’t write sex scenes,” I burst out laughing at your example. 🙂
LikeLike