A book about Uttam Kumar attempts to get at the man behind the movie screen, with middling results.
Swapan Mullick, the author of Mahanayak Revisited: The World of Uttam Kumar, writes early on about his curiosity about the man behind the larger-than-life personalities the actor depicted on screen. His curiosity is ours – for who hasn’t felt the urge to know what the object of one’s worship (whether Uttam Kumar or anyone else) is really like? Mullick had begun going to school when Kumar had his first hit, Agni Pariksha, in 1954. “As I grew older,” Mullick recalls, “it was impossible to be insulated from the passions – however restrained and conservative they were in tone and treatment – that Uttam Kumar and Suchitra Sen expressed with such powerful conviction.” After school, inevitably, Mullick became an “Uttam-observer like the majority of confirmed Calcuttans who wallowed in two obsessions – films and football.” Soon after, just out of his teens, Mullick set out to the now-defunct Movietone studio to extract information about his idol’s self-imposed exile in Bombay. A note was sent to the set where Kumar was shooting, and a meeting was arranged for the following day. “It was to be my first close encounter with the superstar.”
Like these affairs usually are, the meeting was a disappointment. From the star’s side, a new journalist is an unproven commodity, just another person with a sheet of questions. You don’t know if he’s going to be respectful, intelligent, thoughtless or gossipy. From the journalist’s side, the expectations – derived from observing the actor on screen – are sky-high. You want a “performance” here to match the performances you’ve grown up admiring. The actor’s wariness ends up cancelling out the journalist’s enthusiasm. Mullick was terribly disappointed by the brief exchange, where Kumar denied that his stay in Bombay had anything to do with the tensions in Calcutta in the 1970s, as was widely reported. Kumar’s replies were “clouded with clichés and did not live up to the expectations of the sensational exposure I was pursuing… Uttam, the boy from Bhowanipore, preferred the glorified and escapist image he continued to project on screen for thirty-two years. He was the idol who considered it prudent to be admired on screen rather than on the streets.”
This presents a problem for the chronicler of a life, and the only way out is to fill the blanks with an informed mix of fact and speculative fiction. You cannot make things up entirely, but you can, based on available evidence, extrapolate just enough and weave a compelling narrative. Mullick, however, is content to leave threads dangling. “Why Uttam chose that point in time to play the journalist in so many films that were vastly similar… was anyone’s guess.” “Why he never insisted on better scripts from directors… was one of the mysteries that will never be solved.” “What prompted [Ray] to turn towards Uttam Kumar at that stage is far from clear.” “[The] association with three women [Suchitra Sen, Sabitri Chatterjee, Supriya Chowdhury (née Banerjee)] who had a crucial influence on Uttam is the stuff of high drama, but there are gaps in the narrative that have not been filled to this day.” And after Kumar’s death, “Whether the industry failed him in those last years, or he paid the price for self-inflicted despair, was a story that will never be told.”
The World of Uttam Kumar, therefore, ends up far less encompassing that the title suggests, though Mullick still takes us through a fascinating tour around the highlights of a legendary career, one that began when a young man named Arun came to try his luck in the film industry at a time the studio system had collapsed and Bengali cinema was ready for ideas. He was unremarkable, except for a gifted singing voice. “He may have become nothing more than a teacher in one of the hundreds of music schools,” says Mullick, but for his single-minded pursuit of his ultimate objective. Arun became Uttam Kumar, the beloved star who, at a point, appeared in at least seven of the thirty-five Bengali films made each year. (Shockingly, only fifty of his films have survived. He made over 200.) Upon his demise, at the age of fifty-four, Satyajit Ray remarked, “There will never be an actor like him.”
Considering Kumar’s reputation, the fanatical following he commanded, Mahanayak Revisited is a curiously slim volume, its content further attenuated by long-winded prose. (And rhetorical insights like: “How could Uttam have known that the ‘60s would leave him with an incredible cocktail of triumphs and tragedies?”) But at least for someone not all that familiar with Kumar’s films and life, this is a useful guide. We learn about his historic partnership with Suchitra Sen (“It is difficult to recall a screen pair anywhere in the world that has left behind a romantic legacy so steeped in fantasy and yet so close to the Bengali ethos…”), his extramarital relationship with Supriya Chowdhury (who went on to star in Ritwik Ghatak’s Meghe Dhaka Tara), his Hindi-film misadventures (his rejection of Bees Saal Baad turned out to be Biswajit’s big ticket to Bombay cinema), and his important Bengali works, including the two Ray collaborations, Nayak and Chiriyakhana, on whose sets he suffered his first heart attack.
Mullick is an unabashed fan, but also an honest critic. He admits that Kumar became a much better actor after working with Ray, and that Soumitra Chatterjee was quite brilliant in Saat Panke Bandha, a film that Kumar let go. “Uttam’s overwhelming romanticism would have come in the way of a performance that was required to end with the man leaving the house and the city in dismay and disgust. Could Uttam afford to suggest that he was the loser? [But] Soumitra had nothing to prove or protect.” Most poignant of all is Mullick’s lament that the Uttam Kumar phenomenon was hemmed in by the borders of Bengal. “The painstaking imagination with which he managed to adapt his looks, his mannerisms and acting styles to a stunning variety of personalities and situations ought to have been a matter of interest to audiences everywhere. But what he remained till the end was a regional hero.” The story isn’t very different today.
Lights, Camera, Conversation… is a weekly dose of cud-chewing over what Satyajit Ray called Our Films Their Films. An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2013 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
aditebanerjie
June 7, 2013
Discussing Uttam Kumar is a major passion for Bengalis. Mention his name and you will rake up enough facets, points of view and heated debates that would fill thousands of pages. It takes an intrepid writer to brave the criticism that a book on the “mahanayak”, who continues to live on in 70mm fashion in the memories of generations of Bengali fans, is undoubtedly going to evoke. It might have been more interesting to discuss some of these perceptions of the superstar’s fans in order to get a real glimpse into the phenomenon that was Uttam Kumar.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
June 7, 2013
I have a feeling that he would have been crucified if he had even suggested the hero was a man with all his flaws and frailities. 🙂 Perhaps it is better to leave things unsaid, even in a work that aims to deconstruct the actor to reveal the man underneath.
LikeLike
skb
June 8, 2013
Have followed your blog for the last one year. I believe its the first time I have seen you write a piece on a bengali artiste. But then again this is a lit review. Would love to know your own views on our matinee God.
Slightly off topic, had hoped for something on Rituparno Ghosh in the blog. It never came. Have you seen his films?
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 8, 2013
“The painstaking imagination with which he managed to adapt his looks, his mannerisms and acting styles to a stunning variety of personalities and situations ought to have been a matter of interest to audiences everywhere. But what he remained till the end was a regional hero.”
“The story isn’t very different “.
Ha. Anyone particular in mind Mr. Rangan 🙂
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 8, 2013
OK off-topic – very off-topic
Whats the original of “Neele neele ambar par ?” Its a mottai song….. i just can’;t it hit at the moment, (blame the liquor)
LikeLike
brangan
June 8, 2013
Anu Warrier: Oh, this is no hagiography. Quite a bit of “flaws and frailties” revealed here.
skb: I don’t know that I’ve seen enough of his work to have any useful opinion. The only Bengali films of his I’ve seen are the Ray ones — and he was terrific in those. And in Hindi, “Amanush,” “Anand Ashram,” “Dooriyan” – he came across as an affable personality. He wasn’t asked to do much. About his role in “Desh Premee” the less said the better 🙂
Again, with Ghosh, I haven’t seen all that many films. Just not available with subtitles (at least when I looked for them). But I really like his work. I really like the unexpected nature of relationships (and the tangential nature of conversations), like in the scene in “Raincoat”, for example, when a bedridden Ajay Devgan playfully pulls Aishwarya Rai towards him after his mother leaves the room. She doesn’t squeal, “Chhodo na, maa dekh legi,” as you’d expect, but instead explains rather practically, “Mujhe bhi bukhaar lag jaayegi.” Awesome.
venkates: Sacrilege. “Ilaya nila” from “Payanangal Mudivadhillai” 🙂
LikeLike
Sudipta Bhattacharjee
June 8, 2013
Brangan – Most, if not all, Rituparno movies are now available with superlative subtitles. I would highly recommend movies like “Unishe April”, “Dosar”, “Chitrangada” (As an actor – slightly autobiographical, this one), “Dahan” and “Chokher Bali” (which is a lot more commercial, what with Aisharya Rai et al., but still enriched with many of his typical flourishes).
On Uttam Kumar, legends abound about him – the first and only ‘Megastar’ in Bengali cinema till date. Amongst all his ‘methods’ I was most impressed about his painstaking efforts to learn formal dancing for “Chhoti Si Mulakat” (whole film at – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c2Shf3Uug8&wide=1) just so that he doesn’t look silly doing his first Hindi film dance, that too opposite Vyjayanthimala, for this song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N5Sc33I1tU (See from 25th second onwards – of course, now the dance steps do look quite silly 🙂 I cannot overemphasize how unusual this was in that time and social milieu for a Bengali, actor-star to learn formal dancing and that too after becoming an established star. As a ‘hero’ he didn’t get much scope to show his acting chops – but in his late 40s/early 50s he did quite a few character roles/’villains’ which were brilliant. Interestingly, recently, his diary (unfinished) has been discovered and has been published. When I read it, I was struck by the floral language used in his daily entries (may be that’s how educated Bengalis write in that day and age) and his increasing frustation with lack of challenging roles. He keeps writing about his need to make potloads of money to maintain a ‘starry’ lifestyle [and to pay off debts from the debacle of “Chhoti si Mulakat” (supra), which he funded] and consequent inability to get involved only in films he believed in. He writes in one place that if he did only what he liked, he may not get even one film in a year! I guess these dilemmas never get old!
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 8, 2013
BR : Danke Schon i am now going to resign my membership of the Illayaraja fan club.
(Hangs head in shame)
LikeLike