Two strangely similar comedies have hit screens this week – and it’s not just the déjà vu brought on by the overlapping cast (Devadarshini, Bosskey, Manobala, and the seemingly unstoppable Santhanam). Both films are centered around elaborate (and somewhat mean-spirited) con jobs perpetrated on innocents. Both feature alabaster-toned heroines (Isha Talwar, Hansika Motwani) who appear as much as home in these surroundings as a Zulu tribesman in Gstaad. The pacing in both these comedies suffers severely from ill-timed (and badly shot) song breaks. Both films manufacture gags from 1960s TM Soundararajan hits. Both try to milk laughs from the (now apparently mandatory) exclamation: “It’s a medical miracle.” And both weave riffs on 1970s Amol Palekar comedies. If Sundar C’s Theeya Velai Seiyyanum Kumaru is possessed by the spirit of Chhoti Si Baat, then Badri’s Thillu Mullu is a reincarnation of Gol Maal. Oh, and both films – each about two-and-a-quarter hours long – feature about a half-hour of genuine laughs.
Thillu Mullu tells the story of a young man (‘Akila Ulaga Super Star’ Shiva) who lands a job with a lie, and is forced to act as his own twin to avoid being fired. Shiva’s USP is that he delivers his comic lines with utmost earnestness, without intonations or quotation marks – and we laugh as much at the rubbish he’s spouting as our being (almost) taken in by his mock-seriousness. (“Neenga Facebook-la irukkeengala?” “Illa, Mylapore-la irukken.”) But he’s performing in a vacuum. The film, in its earlier avatar, was aided immensely by the eye-rolling eccentricities of ‘Thengai’ Srinivasan, which is exactly what’s needed when the hero is playing it straight. Prakash Raj, here, isn’t allowed that kind of leeway – he’s given nothing to work with. And things are made worse by a screenplay that moves in fits and starts, never building up steam. Isn’t there more to comedy than one-liners?
Theeya Velai Seiyyanum Kumaru at least has better one-liners, borderline surreal non sequiturs – and all of them are entrusted with RJ Balaji. (“Cycle-la kaathu illa, Ernakulathula vaathu illa”.) Santhanam, in comparison, comes off a tad stale, with his now-patented mix of alliteration and rhyme. The story has to do with a wallflower (Siddharth) who’s forced to hire the services of a “love guru” (Santhanam) in order to get the girl of his dreams. Like Thillu Mullu (and unlike Sundar C’s earlier film and rousing return to form, Kalakalappu), Theeya Velai Seiyyanum Kumaru is hampered by a screenplay that needed to be zippier, and its most revealing aspect may be its equation of unattractive women with Gandhimathi and Vadivukkarasi, while the other end of the spectrum is brought up by invoking Kareena Kapoor. All we have in this state, apparently, are women of a certain age, which is why we have to keep importing our heroines. Mystery solved.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2013 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Anuja
June 15, 2013
The Thillu Mullu remake has reinforced my strong belief that the classics are best left alone. Rajini and Thengai Srinivasan created the sort of movie magic that is almost impossible to recreate. Heck! I doubt Rajini himself can pull it off again. I won’t say the original version was flawless since the film falters towards the end with some seriously labored attempts at OTT comedy but the entire remake was a painfully labored attempt at OTT comedy which left me groaning in pain and feeling extremely ill – disposed towards those responsible for this farce. Now if the same geniuses were to decide to do a remake of Michael Madan Kamarajan, I just may be tempted to take up a no – holds barred campaign to stop the miscreants who are out to mangle our beloved classics!
LikeLike
Shankar
June 15, 2013
Now, Manivannan! He will be missed….amidst the Senthil-Koundamani slapstick comedy period, he carved his own niche.
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 16, 2013
I for one have more love towards the original – Gol Maal – may be because i saw it first.
LikeLike
dinakaranonline
June 16, 2013
Thillu Mullu worked for me to a certain extent mainly few scenes only while Theeya was a laugh riot. Enjoyed it thoroughly except for songs! I felt screenplay and dialogues were very smart and neatly woven in narration .Did you know screenplay and dialogues were written by Soodhu Kavum fame Nalan 🙂
LikeLike
Ravi K
June 17, 2013
I like Gol Maal. Haven’t seen Thillu Mullu. Is it worth seeing? Somehow I can’t imagine Rajini pulling off the Amol Palekar role of an average guy in over his head.
LikeLike
brangan
June 17, 2013
Ravi K: Rajini’s is a more stylised portrayal, but it’s fun too. But the film really belongs to Thengai Srinivasan and Sowcar Janaki. You should try it sometime…
On another note, does anyone remember the name of the Indian Express’s Tamil film critic in the late 80s/early 90s. He was the only Indian critic of the time whose reviews I breathlessly awaited. I can recall phrases from his writing — “Anjali” (“there’s more light than heat”), “Vanna Vanna Pookkal” (where he’d used the word “prurient” in a most beautiful way) — but I can’t recall his name. If these reviews are on the web someplace, even better 🙂
LikeLike
Shankar
June 19, 2013
I know he was a columnist, not sure if he was a regular film critic, but are you referring to Randor Guy?
LikeLike
indianmalefeminist
June 19, 2013
I thought Theeya was decent fun actually. Can’t recall any decent movie that managed to make me LOL, so I’ll give them that.
Thillu Mullu, not even interested tbh. Might watch it on DVD or something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kiruba
June 19, 2013
rousing return to ”form”? That’s really too much for Sundar C 🙂
LikeLike
raj
June 19, 2013
I can give you the Hindu reviewer of late 80s and 90sm – DS Ramanujam but like his successor, Ralathi, he is best forgotten.
LikeLike
Saikumar
June 19, 2013
Is it by any chance Gautaman Bhaskaran? I remember reading some not favourable reviews for Tamil films during that period(particularly for Roja).
LikeLike
brangan
June 20, 2013
Saikumar: All those folks were with the Hindu… not Express.
LikeLike
vijay
June 21, 2013
Hansika “Moti”wani looks more like Sidhdharth’s bhabhi. Indha thamizh makkalsoda tastaye purinjukka mudiyala
BR, cant help you with the reviewer, but “more light than heat” seems like a reference to Agni natchathiram rather than Anjali. W.r.t to 80s/90s reviews nothing quite like Anandha vikatan’s with their weird marks like 39 or 41(what formula do they use?) for a movie they liked
LikeLike
brangan
June 21, 2013
vijay: No, that was for “Anjali.” He’d remarked about the light pouring through the windows and then went on to conclude the review like this. It was thrilling to see how he’d zone in on the things that struck him, rather than summarize the film for readers.
LikeLike
pr3m
June 21, 2013
Nobody asked your views on the Chennai Express trailer yet? Haha, you guys are gonna be sooo offended!
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
July 1, 2013
This movie was a test of “Santhanam endurance”. And I failed.
The one-liners are becoming repetitive and not funny anymore. I had decent hopes after Kalakalappu and came back very disappointed with this one.
LikeLike
brangan
May 7, 2014
Thank you, ram murali, for digging out the Indian Express reviewer, and for sending the links to the “Anjali” and “Agni” reviews (you’ll have to scroll though the pages).
I see now that my own style of reviewing appears to be patterned somewhat after his writing, which was more impressionistic than a holistic “evaluation” of the film. I think he was probably the first in Chennai to do this sort of reviewing.
And vijay, yes, you were right. “more light than heat” was in the “agni” review 🙂 What I remembered was the part from the “Anjali” review about the windows being on fire.
Here’s the mail that ram murali so kindly sent me. This really made my day 🙂
———————————
Hello Mr. Rangan,
9 steps to solve a “major” mystery!
1. Wanted to watch thillu mullu tonight (mirchi shiva’s version) but wanted to read your review first…
2. Looked through the comments
3. Saw that you’d asked about an Indian Express reviewer
4. Thought of the archive that I stumbled upon online:
5. http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19880422&printsec=frontpage&hl=en
6. Vividly Remembered reading reviews of my classics by looking at the release dates in Wikipedia
7. Very vividly remembered reading the “light > heat” line in the review of Agni… (page 5)
8. Lo and behold! Your mystery is solved (in case you didn’t solve it already!) – N Krishnaswamy
9. For kicks, here’s his review of Anjali: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19900713&printsec=frontpage&hl=en
Best,
A true film veriyan J
PS: I am at the end of my workday…vetti, clearly!
LikeLike
brangan
May 13, 2014
What? No one else read N Krishnaswamy? Oh come on… 🙂
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 14, 2014
Well, I did read through these 2 reviews and found the Agni Review frankly boring. The Anjali Review was better but nothing to write home about. Oh come on. You would have done better.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
May 15, 2014
Sorry sir I was 5 or 6 when that Anjali review came about so not read. :p
@Rahini David: I am going to make a lot of assumptions but for its time I think these reviews are pretty interesting. Not really about who could have done better. I doubt how many people would have written such flowing thoughts about films (tamil especially so) this way without getting into the this was good, that was bad kind of evaluation.
LikeLike
brangan
May 15, 2014
Rahini David: You’ll have to put on 1980s lenses and read the review. No one else that time was writing such *personal* reviews. And with some semblance of writerly style.
Gradwolf: I guess you were too busy reading The Fountainhead 🙂
LikeLike
Sriram Somasunderam
May 15, 2014
saar,
I could see your roots in N.Krishnaswamy’s Anjali review.
LikeLike
ram murali
May 15, 2014
i like your distinction between impressionistic writing and holistic evaluations…i would say that roger ebert fell squarely in the former camp, always personal, to the point that you could kinda get glimpses into the man writing the words…my favorite reviewer in the latter camp is balaji balasubramaniam (www.bbthots.com) who would cover everything from the quality of the key supporting players to individual songs…balaji’s reviews are thoughtful and very well-written…they’re also very comprehensive in how they help one make up one’s mind whether 2 1/2 hrs in a movie is worth investing in…
LikeLike