Same hero, same director – so what’s new, you ask? This time around, we have Anjali, outfitted with a doughy midriff and promoted to item girl. We have not one but three villains – a “bad” Muslim (but no worries, in these films, he’s always counterbalanced by a “good” Muslim), a black man who labels himself “King of the Indian Ocean,” and a tycoon with a fondness for shiny shirts. We have Hansika Motwani, doing her best, as always, to emulate a goldfish gasping for air. We have nods to Angry Birds, false eyelashes, brown sugar, pearl divers, a local don in Durban, a sniper on a rooftop, exploding gas cylinders, and quick-cut glimpses of so many stars that we seem to be inside a television awards show. Oh, and we have the Singam Dance, which, if the heavens are kind, won’t become a viral sensation like the Macarena or the Gangnam style. Then again, this movie got made.
Otherwise, the overlong Singam II is very much like its predecessor, a wholesome family entertainer filled with upright moral values and penis jokes. And like the earlier film, this sequel endorses questionable practices – corporal punishment (mischief-makers not caned in school, apparently, will grow up to be delinquents caned by the police) and vigilante justice. The latter, of course, is par for the course in these masala movies, but when meted out by a man in khaki filled with the purpose and the righteousness of an avatar of God vanquishing a demon, there’s something very disturbing. But that’s nothing compared to the hero’s (Duraisingam, played by Suriya with a roar that can be heard in the outer galaxies) invocation of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in order to teach a few local rowdies a lesson. And elsewhere, he occupies himself by dispensing lectures about the Indian police, about the sanctity of the national anthem, about the purity of love. The film could have been called To Stir, With Love.
But the director Hari isn’t bothered about any of this because Singam II isn’t a movie in the traditional sense of a story told with a compelling emotional arc and shot and put together with some semblance of craft, but a theme-park ride that, once you get on, just won’t stop moving. The reels appear to be mounted not so much on a projector as a rollercoaster, and this sense of constant movement, brought about in no small part by a constantly roving camera, is some sort of minor achievement. Hari keeps his scenes extremely short, and if this prevents us from forming any sort of lingering attachment with the characters, at least we aren’t allowed to dwell on anything long enough to get bored. In Singam, we got to know the people around the hero, and they lent him a human dimension; here, these scenes with others (including the heroine Anushka Shetty) are so perfunctory, they could have been axed and no one would have noticed.
The audiences in the theatre seemed to be loving every moment, if the noise levels were any indication, and I wondered what they could be responding to – there’s no joy in the film. The mass-hero potboiler is a superb template on which to mount an entertaining movie, but it’s only a template – there’s still work to be done, scenes to be dramatically sketched, emotional trajectories to be precisely tracked, characters to be effectively outlined, songs to be imaginatively staged, fights to be sensationally choreographed. Even the dramatic emergence of Duraisingam in uniform, after an undercover mission, is fuelled more by the blare of a thousand trumpets (that’s what most of the background score sounds like) than the heart-swelling realisation that an exiled king is being reinstated on his throne. Oh, but who cares? Certainly not the viewers. Returning home, I was trapped in a traffic jam, unexpected at that hour. The reason, of course, were the cars and bikes pouring into the theatre that lay ahead, unmindful of the Housefull sign for the next screening of Singam II.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2013 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Bala
July 6, 2013
Yaay Snarky Rangan is back and how ! 😀
LikeLike
kalpeshjain22Kalpesh Jain
July 6, 2013
“a wholesome family entertainer filled with upright moral values and penis jokes” – Oh! You just rock. By the way is there anything in the film for the audience expecting “something different”?
LikeLike
brangan
July 6, 2013
Bala: Two hours and forty-five minutes will do that to anyone, I guess 🙂
kalpeshjain22Kalpesh Jain: Something different? Here? How’s that even possible?
LikeLike
Bhavadas
July 6, 2013
I guess we have a superhit here then..
LikeLike
kalpeshjain22Kalpesh Jain
July 6, 2013
What I man is some tactics which I regularly find in Suriya’s movies.And I am surprised for you quick reply.
LikeLike
Mambazha Manidhan
July 6, 2013
I completely enjoyed this one. The upright moral values was a welcome change from all the recent movies. I found myself clapping at a few mass lines. Santhanam was a riot! So was Vivek.
I also kept thinking of an alternate “traditional sense of a story told with a compelling emotional arc” kinda movie with Suriya like Kaakha Kaakha set in the real world and pace. That would be a different movie, yes. This one works too in its own custom home-brewed relentless fast-forward action genre. What I can’t stand is the middle-ground like Maatraan.
LikeLike
KayKay
July 7, 2013
WARNING! WARNING!
Gross violation in sentence formation detected!
Nature of offence: Usage of “compelling emotional arc” and “semblance of craft” along with ” Hari” in the same sentence.
LikeLike
brangan
July 7, 2013
KayKay: ROFL! But “Saamy” was pretty good, in all those respects. Have you forgotten? 🙂
LikeLike
Udhav Naig
July 7, 2013
If I may add, our Dorai singam, the honest police officer hurls racist abuse on the black villain, Danny. He calls him ‘Africa Korangu’ once and ‘africa mirugam’ the second time while seeking help of the South African police.
I was also shocked, literally shocked, when Santhanam spilled the ‘Arabia Kudhirai maadhiri irukka….Orama kootinu poi senja….’
Such crassness in the name of humour. Wish Kamal Haasan makes next a good comedy.
LikeLike
indianmalefeminist
July 7, 2013
This is exactly why I’m unable to watch this clown’s movies (Hari or whatever the hell his name is) – I mean whatever, brainless action and punch dialogues are all fine, but the whole lectures on morality are just so repulsive and makes me throw up a little. Sexism, racism, potential child abuse, etc. all stuffed into a “holesome family entertainer”. And I bet that gets plenty of claps in the theater too.
LikeLike
venkatesh
July 7, 2013
“we have Anjali, outfitted with a doughy midriff and promoted to item girl. “
Thats it, i am in.
LikeLike
brangan
July 7, 2013
Udhav Naig: But there were plenty of dick jokes in the earlier “Singam” too. Remember the one where Vivek runs into Anushka dressed like a tiger, and he says “puli-kku vaale ivvalavu perusunnaa…” What galls me is not the vulgarity. I like off-colour humour. But have the balls to ask for an A certificate. Don’t say you’re making a family entertainer and then have these jokes.
LikeLike
indianmalefeminist
July 7, 2013
@brangan Yeah fully agree. Saamy was his least offensive film though, right? I mean with the progressive Iyer and all that 😛
LikeLike
KayKay
July 7, 2013
Saamy…..pretty good…There goes your second violation in a day 🙂
Honestly, for these sort of masala flicks, I’d take someone like Dharani over this ass-clown anyday. Dhill, Dhool and Gilli were superlative examples of what you can do with this genre.
Apart from imbuing the lead character with some shades of grey, Saamy was a dreadfully amateurish piece of film making, a master class in ineptness with regards to plotting, pacing and editing.
And someone forgot to tell Harry that undercranking the camera to speed up the film during action scenes was considered novel..sometime during the silent film era.
LikeLike
KayKay
July 7, 2013
“Don’t say you’re making a family entertainer and then make these type of jokes”
Harry is once again hewing to a template perfected by his mentors like Rama Narayanan who’d proudly crow that their films were suitable for the family…..and then treat Ma, Pa and their 2 tots to the jiggling flesh of Jayamalini and Jothi Lakshmi.
LikeLike
ram
July 7, 2013
Dear BR, the movie was entertaining. The lag point is the villains. With better / apt actors as villains, the film would have been gripping. Good to see you condemn the “honouring of encounters”. If the filmmaker wishes to have dick jokes, he should have the balls to ask for an “A” certificate. I agree Saamy was better crafted. An actor of Surya’s stature should not have used the words for the black villain. BTW, I liked that “kappal tharai thattiruchu” an “A” joke by Santhanam.
LikeLike
udhavn
July 8, 2013
I don’t mind them either. It is just that it was a direct reference to a sexual act (fantasy) imagined on Anushka and it was so direct and everyone laughed. It is a rape joke actually.
Even the most ridiculous penis jokes are rarely made on heroes. Even if that is the case, the “masculinity” (size) is never questioned , only elevated.
LikeLike
Shankar
July 8, 2013
Well, you walk in fully knowing what to expect….why complain then? I have no regard for Hari but his movies seem to make money and there seem to be folks who enjoy them. So, either stay away or go for the ride! 🙂 I never questioned when a knife revolved by itself in mid-air faced with oru mottai, oru meesai and naalu school pasanga….I’m not going to begin now! 🙂
LikeLike
Vishak Bharadwaj
July 8, 2013
a wholesome family entertainer filled with upright moral values and penis jokes
That there Is right up there with any arrested development joke ever made.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
July 8, 2013
Oh I totally love Saamy!
LikeLike
Ravi K
July 8, 2013
The first Singam is a guilty pleasure of mine. Sure, it has all the familiar tropes of these films. Family sentiment, annoyingly girlish heroine, questionable police tactics, unnecessary song intrusions. But it is entertaining because of the ridiculously OTT action scenes, Surya’s scenery-chewing in them, and the fairly brisk pace at which it moves.
My main complaints are that Anuskha is made to act like a particularly immature teenager (with an awfully girlish dubbing voice) when she has a more mature aura to her, and that the songs are not memorable.
Singam 2, however, is a mess in comparison. None of the three villains are as entertaining as Prakash Raj in the first one. In the effort to add an international scope and to the film Hari lost a lot of the straightforward, meat-and-potatoes (or should I say “kozhi-and-kizhangu”) appeal of the first film. The scenes with Hansika and Anushka feel perfunctory.
LikeLike
brangan
July 8, 2013
udhavn: With your advanced degree in cinema and all, I think you should write a thesis on “Penis Humour and the… er, Rise of the Tamil Film Hero.” Go for it, man 🙂
Shankar: What you’re talking about are the elements, like one man dispatching a dozen goons or stopping a bullet. What I’m talking about is the screenwriting *around* those elements. The fact that we enjoy the first aspect doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t expect a bit of quality in the second, as in (sorry, KayKay) “Saamy”.
Ravi K: That Hansika-Anushka scene involving false eyelashes will go down in history as one of the most legendarily awful screenwriting contrivances. Sometimes you have to wonder if there’s a new -ism in filmmaking that you’re missing out on, something like modern art, where you don’t know if something just looks terrible or it’s really terrible 🙂
Agree that the first film was quite fun — wrote about it here.
In the Raja days, these crappy films would at least come with good songs. I don’t think they care anymore. I think the logic is: “The film is going to be a hit anyway, so who cares about catchy tunes?” Or for that matter cinematography. Is there anything more depressing than a multi-crore movie where not a single shot — not one — is memorable?
LikeLike
Shankar
July 8, 2013
Baddy, I’m not suggesting that we should not expect better screen writing. But knowing that it will be abysmal, given the track record (Saamy is a minor exception), I keep my expectations really low. Another director who baffles me with his success is Prabhu Deva. He is like the hottest director in Hindi now. Go figure! 🙂
LikeLike
sanjay2706
July 8, 2013
@brangan – Oh there is one memorable shot. The helicopter shot where we look at a car zooming past piles of salt. A shot which the script demanded.
LikeLike
lowlylaureate
July 8, 2013
Loved the movie completely. Dunno what you are talking about. Hari much like Shankar is a genre by himself.
LikeLike
Praveen
July 9, 2013
http://twitchfilm.com/2013/07/review-suriyas-singam-2-stoops-to-ridiculous-lows-to-entertain-the-masses.html
This guy makes some valid points.
LikeLike
Praveen
July 9, 2013
@Udhav Naik: Looks like Kamal is indeed making a good comedy with Crazy Mohan.
http://www.sify.com/movies/kamal-haasan-to-be-directed-by-ramesh-aravind-news-tamil-nhiliCeihga.html
LikeLike
Rajeev
July 9, 2013
@lowlylaureate – ” Hari much like Shankar is a genre by himself .”
Dafuq did I just read ? -_-
LikeLike
lowlylaureate
July 10, 2013
@Rajeev any grammatical error?
LikeLike
brangan
July 10, 2013
The Quiz Foundation of India’s two-day
quizzing weekend will take place this Saturday and Sunday at IIT (there’s also a movie quiz, see below):
What: Movie Quiz
When: Saturday, July 13th. 4.00 – 9.00 PM
Where: Central Lecture Theater, IIT-Madras
Details: Open to all. Teams of 3 members. Prelims will start at 4.00,
Finals by 6.30.
LikeLike
Rajeev
July 10, 2013
@lowlylaureate – Nope . I’m just appalled by the comparison that you made .
LikeLike
Mambazha Manidhan
July 10, 2013
BR, hosting or participating?
LikeLike
venkatesh
July 11, 2013
BR : now that quiz i would have liked to attend – are you the MC ? participating , spectator ?
LikeLike
lowlylaureate
July 11, 2013
hmm not understanding why it is appalling, should write a post to explain further.
LikeLike
vijay
July 15, 2013
Talking of Saamy it must have taken Hari’s mentor(?) KS Sorikumar some major guts to cast a 50+ Sanjay Dutt in the remake of Saamy. Shows the market for these kind of films, the willing actors and the demand for inept directors like Prabhu Deva. The hero BTW, is getting a first hand account of ‘Policegiri’ himself these days in a twist of fate. Nothing quite like shooting for a movie titled Policegiri and then heading straight to jail. You only wish that they arrested KSR too for his movie crimes
LikeLike
Vidya Sundararajan
August 16, 2013
Good one… Given with the director’s track record this one which rides heavily on its predecessor….is no surprise….but the decibel levels were too high and became intolerable very soon.
LikeLike
hari prasad
April 17, 2023
Much before Scorsese termed the Marvel movies as ” theme park rides” , we had our Baddy use the same term for the Singam movies.
அன்றே கமலஹாசன் போல கணித்த பரத்வாஜ் ரங்கன்.
LikeLike
hari prasad
April 17, 2023
Even Blue Sattai Maaran termed the Singam movies as theme park rides , just saying.
LikeLike
Madan
April 18, 2023
hari prasad: Scorsese probably saw this review and thought if BR could survive the Attack of The Surya Fans after using the coinage ‘theme park’, he would too. He didn’t bargain for what a sacred cow MCU, of all the many things that have come out of Holly, has become. I could understand the outrage if he had said Citizen Kane or Vertigo are not cinema (except he wouldn’t, of course). It’s also interesting how the theme park coinage has gradually become mainstream-ized after the overwhelming negative reaction to Scorsese’s words….at the same time as the fortunes of Marvel films too have dwindled and have correctly become associated with the creative decay of Disney.
LikeLike
vsrini
April 18, 2023
@Madan: “Scorsese probably saw this review and thought if BR could survive the Attack of The Surya Fans after using the coinage ‘theme park’, he would too.” ROTFLMAO 😂😂
Hope there’s a Revenge of the Baddy sequel too
LikeLiked by 1 person
hari prasad
April 18, 2023
But Suriya’s fandom wasn’t and isn’t as rabid as the Vijay / Ajith fandom let alone the MCU fanbase.
Post 7am Arivu , Suriya lost the box office market that he held from Ghajini and the resurgence of Vijay , the sudden rise of Ajith with Mankatha made matters worse for him and with Anjaan , he’s history.
To this date , he’s yet to rise up from the marana adi that the massive hype and the evantual gargantuan failure of Anjaan gave , the success at Amazon Prime notwithstanding.
So , Singam 2 still remains Suriya’s last big hit.
LikeLike
hari prasad
April 18, 2023
Even septuagenarian stars Rajini and Kamal didn’t lose their stardom after all these years and still a new project from them creates a huge buzz among people.
LikeLike