If a film could be judged simply by what’s in it, much like judging a dish based on the ingredients, then Naveen’s Moodar Koodam is a delicious black comedy. There’s an absurdist musical number awash in neon lighting. There’s a Caucasian who sets out to buy ganja in a T-shirt that bears the face of Gandhi. There’s a character named Mandodhari. There’s an impromptu boxing match in a living room. There are pungent musical cues, off-kilter versions of bits ranging from Vivaldi and Tchaikovsky to Bharathi’s Achchamillai achchamillai to Nila nila odi vaa. There’s the Chennai branch of Dawood Ibrahim’s operations. There’s an unlettered thief who mistakes “happy life” for “apple pazham, and who keeps referring to his “job ethics.” And there are vivid backstories narrated like the silent movies (with intertitles) and like cartoons. Even the dog here – a Great Dane, and as much a dysfunctional “fool” as the rest of the cast, as the title suggests – gets its own flashback. It’s all exceedingly clever.
Cleverness in the movies is something of a tightrope walk. There are films that the audience feels are clever, and there are films where we feel that the filmmaker is being very clever. And with Moodar Koodam, we’re left with the latter feeling. This is a film that could have used an editor. Not the editor from the movies, whose contributions usually kick in after shooting is complete, but the editor from the world of books, who takes the manuscript from a first-time author and tells him what’s working and what isn’t and shapes the material with a firm hand. Throw out this subplot. Tone down the mannerisms, the eccentricities (which are great fun, but only up to a point). Tighten the narrative. Keep the momentum going. Lose the moralizing, the haves-versus-have-nots speechifying. These are a few editorial directives that might have benefited this well-intentioned film, which is a little all over the place.
But if Moodar Koodam doesn’t quite come together, it still sets itself apart due to a couple of reasons. One, it’s a genuinely scripted comedy – a noir-comedy, if you want to be more accurate, which has no problem dealing with deaths – as opposed to a screenwriter slapping together a series of one-liners and doing nothing more (which is what most of our comedies are these days). Those backstories exist not just to amuse us with wacky technique, but also to explain why these people did the things they did. Why, for instance, did the leader (Naveen) of the four men (the others are played by Sentrayan, Rajaj and Kuberan) who hold a family hostage end up in a juvenile home? Why does one of his cohorts make the members of this family stand on their heads? Why the strange sympathy for the chubby boy, who’s often called an idiot? These are things we learn in flashes, through these backstories.
Two, there are moments that are genuinely funny. My favourite bits have to do with two little girls, one who falls for Naveen after being slapped across the face (it sounds awful but the genesis of this silly one-sided romance is a hoot) and another who proves herself to be easily bribed with food. (Both these young actors are excellent.) And the little idiocies exhibited by the characters – like the decision by Sentrayan, the dumbest of the bunch, to buy monkey caps instead of masks – have been lovingly detailed. (Watching Naveen clench his teeth in frustration is a lot of fun.) There are a few too many characters, but the scenes with them are inventively staged. At one point, we see a discussion framed, on one side, by a man with a ping pong paddle, and on the other, a henchman with a revolver, waiting for the ball to drop. Naveen isn’t always able to translate what he seems to have had in mind, but at least he does have a lot on his mind. His next film will be awaited with much interest.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2013 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Praveen
September 14, 2013
Sorry to be posting off topic Sir, but did you get to watch Kannada film Lucia? It is crowd funded and the firs Kannada film to be playing across the country. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgIL2H-OdcA
LikeLike
venkatesh
September 14, 2013
i liked the poster of this movie – haven’t seen it but will definitely .
BR: Haven’t you used the tag line “Confederacy of the Dunces” in the past ?
LikeLike
pavithran
September 14, 2013
Watched the film Sir. Really liked it. Felt the same way as you that restraint would’ve helped it. I wish you’d written a little more elaborately On this film. It deserves one such piece. As much as I want to, the language ain’t there..
LikeLike
Shankar
September 15, 2013
Remember how much it was discussed/debated when Rajini was intending to name his daughter Mandodhari? 🙂
LikeLike
venkatesh
September 18, 2013
Shankar : What really ? There was a discussion on that !
LikeLike
brangan
September 19, 2013
Praveen: Yes, Sir. Watched it last Saturday and have a column on it this week.
venkatesh: So maybe I have — shoot me 🙂
pavithran: I wrote pretty much about all the points I had in mind. I mean, it wasn’t a really *deep* movie, was it?
BTW, I’m a little surprised at the (relative) lack of comments here. I thought this would be one of those films that everyone would watch and have an opinion on. Any idea if it’s doing well at the box office?
LikeLike
ram
September 19, 2013
watched it BR. different attempt. ananda vikatan gave 50 marks.
LikeLike
nellaivel
September 19, 2013
tamil hindu gives very favourable review
LikeLike
Manoj
September 20, 2013
Oh pls…couldn’t control my laughter Mr. Baradwaj Rangan.. Moodar Koodam is just a rip-off of the Korean Movie “Attack at the Bus Station”… Not sure whether you had seen the original… Even a layman could make a movie much better than Moodar Koodam once he watches the original…
Not against Naveen… he should have atleast given the credit to the original… probably he didn’t because he was scared that the people would realise that the original is infinite times funnier and sensible…
If a responsible critic like u writing for a leading newspaper praise a rip-off, it sends out a very bad signal to the aspiring filmmakers… Rip-offs are celebrated more than the original… Guess all the aspirants would rather end up at Burma Bazaar looking for more and more foreign language movies….
Ram: If Vikatan’s Review Team watches the original “Attack at the Bus Station”, they should give 200 out of 100…
LikeLike
Manoj
September 20, 2013
Apologies…it should read as “Attack at the Gas Station”….
LikeLike
Manoj
September 20, 2013
Couldn’t tolerate as it has ripped off everything and still being praised by u… which includes scenes, cuts, shots, angles, film language, background score and to the least the waist coat worn by the Villain…. where are we heading???
LikeLike
Chandra Prakash
September 24, 2013
Manoj….agree with you on
” responsible critic like u”….
well we saw how the heap and praise went for the ordinary…run of the mill SRK’s Crap Express by the responsible critic…so you are right…where are we heading??? and getting into “what’s new” sort of feeling reading this professtional/ award winning critics/reviewers reviews.
Please elevate and educate the interests of audience…for the worth of what the content of the movie. Why should one even spend time on writing reviewes mundane…same formulaic movies like Thalaiva….Billa..etc…with no much new stuff in those kind of movies.
We have to give credits as always to BR for his the reviews that are genuine..ex: Soodhu Kavvum…and other Lights, camera conversation write ups such as the recent one on “Lucia” kannada film…
LikeLike
Kasi
October 20, 2013
I have seen this Movie first day evening shoe. and feel enjoied . wht a fresh thought. These kind of director should come up. and i happed to see next week in oonayum attukuutiyom in chandran. This Naveen director also came to watch this movie. I appretiaed from bottom of my heat to Mr. naven reg Moodar koodam movie.
Today just 3 Hours back happend to see Attack of the Gas station in You tube. Shocked. seen by seen copycat movie. Upcoming young director should not grown up like this . In fact Orginal AOGS is too good. . Moodar koodam All jokes and communism thought also copied from AOGS.&Screen play and taking of the movies all are 100 % copied from AOGS.
Really bad Mr. Naveen . Try /think some new ideas. dont try short cut fame.
LikeLike
brangan
October 22, 2013
Manoj and others: If I don’t know a film has been “ripped off,” then I am going to praise things in it as if they were original, right? One cannot see every single film…
LikeLike
Aravind
October 26, 2013
It’s not about whether a movie is a rip-off or not. In that case, you shouldn’t be reading translations. The crux is to just pass on a good message or good movie. I’m sure the mango tree metaphor was not used in the Korean flick. Appreciate the good things even in remakes. The IT culture has given us a thought that remakes mean mere copy paste. Unfortunaletly its not MS Excel you are working on. All movies go in with huge efforts. We should give a deeper thought before blindly setting aside the so called REMAKES.
Please, give the makers their share of the credits too.
LikeLike
Hari
January 15, 2014
I felt the film wasted way too much time, by not creating any sort of challenging situation for the 4 men. All that they do till there is about 25 minutes left in the film is to beat people.
Also the blank cheque written by Jayaprakash citing “nambikkai” didn’t fit well with his character (that of a chit fund fraudster trying to elope the country). Naveen’s communism dialogue was delivered in a rush.
LikeLike