Spoilers ahead…
How does one describe atmosphere in the context of cinema? To call it the very air that the movie needs to breathe would not be an exaggeration – but that’s too unspecific. Atmosphere is in the cinematography, which adds tone and texture to the happenings. It’s in the music, which percolates from one scene to the next and glues them together, even if they occur in different locations. It’s sometimes in the staging, the way the shots are set up, the way the interiors and exteriors are brought to life, so that the film feels like an organic whole, from start to finish. Without atmosphere, a movie is just a collection of scenes that fit oddly, like misshapen jigsaw pieces. We may be able to get a sense of the whole puzzle, but only in our heads. We sense what could have been. What we see, though, is someone labouring to make the pieces fit. It isn’t pretty.
What Nee Enge En Anbe could have been is a solid reimagining of Sujoy Ghosh’s intensely atmospheric Kahaani, rejiggered for the Tamil audience (or at least, the director Sekhar Kammula’s estimation of the sensibilities of the Tamil audience). The story is more or less the same. A young NRI returns to India in search of her missing husband. The major difference is that in the Hindi original, the heroine was pregnant, a development that instantly drew us to her plight and, at the end, resulted in a memorably pulpy twist. But we cannot have a Tamil film based on a pregnant heroine (her name is Anamika), especially if she’s played by a glamorous star like Nayantara, who can’t even part with her fake eyelashes. (In some close-ups, it appears as if a lavishly plumaged bird has come to roost in the outer reaches of her eyes.) How, now, will she earn our sympathies?
So the director cooks up a series of utterly conventional damsel-in-distress scenarios. When Anamika takes her complaint to the police station, she’s told, rudely, that her husband has probably run away. Later, she is propositioned by a lecherous senior cop. The peril of being female and alone in India is a terrific subject for a movie – but Nee Enge En Anbe is not that movie. It is a police procedural wrapped in a vigilante thriller, with mysterious hard disks and a soft-spoken assassin on the loose. Kahaani wisely folded its feminist inquiries into the subtext. When these layers are made the text, we get a movie that’s stranded awkwardly between ideas and action.
The revelations are dispensed with in lumps of ugly exposition. The twist ending is not built up to – when we look back at what happened, it doesn’t really add up. The chases are badly staged. There are many unintentional laughs, particularly from the ineptness with which a beehive is written into the script. And when a great tragedy occurs, we are manipulated in the cheapest possible manner, with a little boy placed at the centre.
Still, some of this could have been salvaged had there been an iota of atmosphere, which can sometimes be manifest even in the way the characters are shaped. The assassin in Kahaani was introduced to us as a boring life insurance agent used to getting screamed at by a much younger boss. Then, this man, whom we dismissed as a baby-faced loser, surprised us by whipping out a gun and offing a series of innocents. In Nee Enge En Anbe, the man has no shading, no alternate life. He’s just a killer who comes out of nowhere. It may difficult to explain atmosphere in the context of cinema, but it’s easy to detect the lack of it. Why go about fixing something that ain’t broke?
KEY:
* Nee Enge En Anbe = Where are you, my love?
* fake eyelashes = see here
* the assassin in Kahaani = see here
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2014 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
kameshkkKamesh
May 3, 2014
Hi Baddy – just came out after watching he movie. Agree with every word of your review! Thanks!
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
May 3, 2014
Rangan, did we really need the tutorial on how to apply fake eyelashes?! *grin*
LikeLike
Raghav
May 3, 2014
Hi BR,I’ve watched Kahaani but not this remake.I heard him say at the audio launch of ‘Anamika'(the telugu version of the remake’) that he found the pregnant part of the heroine troubling since he did not want to ‘use’ pregnancy as a device to extract sentiment. Agreeing to direct this script is a complete miscalculation on his part and is totally not his strength.Shekar Kammula is the go-to guy in the Telugu Film Industry for yuppie promiscuous college boys speaking NRI telugu coming of age (say ‘Happy Days or ‘Life is Beautiful’) with superlative layers of the ‘middle-class’ element without the ‘bad elements’ of a Selvaraghavan film.His only notable work is ‘Godavari’ -which tanked badly-and ever since he’s only reworked his ‘Dollar Dreams’ (debut movie) template.hopefully he’ll introspect on what went wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raj Balakrishnan
May 4, 2014
Great review. Enjoyed every word especially the bit on the false eyelashes. I am sure they have further screwed it up with song and dance sequences too.
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
May 4, 2014
Somebody please tell me about this alleged second innings of Nayanthara, no?
Any actor who appears in “Koffee with DD” suggests Nayanthara as the best female actor around. How did this come to be? Is she really Vidya Balan of the South? What are her notable roles till date?
It reminded me of this discussion sometime back in this space about Ajith and when/how he became a mass(ive)-thala all of a sudden.
LikeLike
brangan
May 4, 2014
Raghav: Thank you for that note. This is another filmmaker whose films I’ve been waiting to see with subs. No luck so far.
Raj Balakrishnan: No song and dances 🙂
oneWithTheH: Don’t ask me. I’ve never been a fan! 🙂 I mean, she’s been a generally tolerable presence and certainly easier to take than the Hansika/Tammannaa brigade, but I don’t see anything more.
LikeLike
Rohan Nair
May 4, 2014
Raghav thanks for an interesting comment on this director for those of us who don’t follow telugu cinema.
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
May 5, 2014
I agree she definitely has better screen presence than a few others. Also, it might be because of the fancy for Kerala based heroines in tamil cinema. In the last decade and a half, maybe even before that, female roles that required any semblance of acting capability have been dutifully filled in by mallu heroines majorly. They are generally expected to do well in the acting department whereas the loosu-ponnu type in the masala genre has usually been donned by models(or alabaster automatons to borrow one of your phrases) from north.
“Royapuram” Peter aptly sums this up in Maan Karate —
“oru kaidhe naandhan peter-u, nee maida gondhu poster-u. avalo dhan namma matter-u…”
How true! 🙂
Nayanthara has probably had the longest stint among the crop of mallu actors and she continues to survive. Trisha too I guess has been there for almost the same length of time, but then she is a Chennai ponnu.
LikeLike
Vasanth
May 5, 2014
Going by the review I guess this one again is a misstep from Kammula after Life is beautiful. Loved his Anand and Godavari, the honesty and subtlety in the said movies literally suffocated me in giving me a good movie watching experience. Hope he goes back to making such simple movies with a lot of heart. And dear BR, I don’t think getting his movies with subtitles isn’t such a tough task. A visit to Burma bazaar/Landmark might help get you his movie DVDs with English subtitles. Only his very less known debut Dollar Dreams is a tough movie to get, other than that Anand, Godavari, Happy days, Leader, Life is beautiful is all easy to get!!
LikeLike
uniquebluerose
May 5, 2014
Nice review….
Always have loved your journey with movie!!!!
But no comments about the leching man…the very very bad English of the “highly intelligent” RAW officer aka Pasupathi!!!!
Why can’t they find the girl in the end…she has signed in so many places!!!
Contrary to how the “fainting” and “not signing anywhere” or being the cleanliness freak that “Vidya Bagchi” is here all that makes no sense at all!!!
Why does Nayantara even put the fainting spell!!!
What the hell did Pasupati mean asking about the sub ordinate officers love life yada yada….
and in the end acts all besotted himself!!!
LikeLike
Roopa
May 6, 2014
I completely fail to understand why Nayanthara is soo overrated.. I mean, when i saw the trailer i was completely put off. This role does not require the protagonist to look glamourised. But with Nayanthara who does not even want to part with her fake lashes or curls or layers of makeup it just does not go anywhere. Was wondering how someone like Parvathy/Sneha or Simran would have handled this role?
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 6, 2014
Just wondering. Do actresses get to choose the length of their eyelashes?
LikeLike
RC
May 8, 2014
Rangan, I am curious – which other directors’ work are you keen to check out?
And Kammula was always a ‘feeling’ director, in his 2 best movies (Anand and Godavari) the stories and characters are driven by what they feel, and rarely by set pieces of drama. Godavari is definitely one of my most favourite movies, even the voiceover during the opening credits is so beautifully done.
And Godavari bombed. May be we only deserve Balakrishna type movies after that.
LikeLike
Indian Male Feminist
May 9, 2014
Oh boy. Seems like an attempt giving up all the underlying themes that made Kahani so good. I mean not that I expected much from a guy who did “Happy Days”, but still. Thank god for your review, wasn’t planning to watch this anyway and now I have a decent inkling on how this panned out.
@Roopa
…with Nayanthara who does not even want to part with her fake lashes or curls or layers of makeup it just does not go anywhere.
Just as Ragini asked, I have no idea how you know that it was her who wanted the curls and stuff in the film? I thought it was generally the filmmakers’ decision (it’s possible that she defied and whatnot, but let’s not make outlandish claims needlessly here)?
I mean I’m not a fan of hers as an actor, but yeah.
LikeLike
Satish Selvam
May 9, 2014
The eyelashes seem to have taken center-stage here..and rightly so !! Highly distracting.
I guess people who have not seen “Kahani” (which owes its delicious twist-ending to we-know-where), “might” like the tamizh/telugu mis-translations. As a person who has seen Kahaani, I was dismayed at what Shekhar had done..I was literally crying at the assassination of Bob’s character and not to mention several other things.
LikeLike
Satish Selvam
May 9, 2014
+1 to RC’s thoughts!!
LikeLike
brangan
May 9, 2014
uniquebluerose: I thought Pasupathy overacted like crazy — but there’s really no point singling out actors when the foundation of the film is so shaky.
Roopa: I was so taken by Parvathy’s peformance in “Maryan” that I felt she’d never be offered another good role again in a film culture that requires glamour from its heroines over all else. I was sadly right.
RC: Hmmm.. Also wanted to check out “Ala Modalaindi”…
LikeLike
Roopa
May 9, 2014
@Rahini David & @Indian Male Feminist
Nayanthara is pretty but i find it very frustrating when there is absolutely no variation in her styling when portraying characters ranging from a small town girl to a NRI(IKVK,Raja rani or Greeka Veerudu).In short, she almost has the SAME look in all her movies which gives me the notion that she sticks to her comfort zone . Am not making any claims here, but then i am not able to buy the fact that she has no say in her styling. I loved Kahaani. Vidya’s rendition of Vidya Bagchi is just awesome. It was an intense performance without any exaggeration. I certainly did not see it in the south indian version.
@Brangan
I also loved Parvathy in ‘Maryan’. It was a delightful performance on par with Dhanush. I also loved her brilliant portrayal of Mari in Sasi’s ‘Poo’. She was absolutely riveting. It is sad that there are lot of other factors that tower over talent when it comes to the casting of actors. I hear that she is part of Kamal ji’s new venture ‘Uthama villain’. Hope she strikes gold this time 🙂
LikeLike
uniquebluerose
May 9, 2014
I agree with Roopa here!!!! Though i noticed the fake lashes only form Raja Rani….
and many Tamil Magazines claim her role Ne Enge….. to deglamorised!!!!!
Logic beats me!!!!
BTW what does actaully “Glamour” mean????? So lady in Saree is in “deglamorised” role????
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 9, 2014
@Roopa:
“but then i am not able to buy the fact that she has no say in her styling”
I have no inside information on it either.
“It is sad that there are lot of other factors that tower over talent when it comes to the casting of actors.”
Maybe I am reading this all wrong. But this seems to imply that Parvathy is a very talented woman who doesn’t have sufficient in the looks department to compete with tradionally pretty women and thereby hasn’t been on the top.
Her facial features are very appealing. Doe-eyed and all that. And also quite well-endowed. In fact she seems to have much arresting features than most actresses.
So what are the other factors that we are taking about?
@Rangan:
“I felt she’d never be offered another good role again in a film culture that requires glamour from its heroines over all else”
I take this to mean that availability of meaty roles for women is very low. That I agree.
LikeLike
KP
May 9, 2014
” I hear that she is part of Kamal ji’s new venture ‘Uthama villain’. Hope she strikes gold this time 🙂 ”
Have you ever heard of a heroine stuck gold after pairing with Kamal? He is the exit door.
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
May 9, 2014
Something about Nayan and her plastic ways had always bothered me for a long time. Until now I wasn’t able to point a finger at anything specific and I realize now the fake eye-lashes maybe it.
Nayantara seems to have taken the “de-glam”(strictly by kollywood standards i mean, despite the fake eyelashes) route in her second innings going by what I saw in Raja Rani, Idhu Kathirvelan…. and this Kahani remake. For the subjective comparison, Something like Simran-part 2 with Kovilpatti Veeralakshmi, Kannathil, PKS, etc. But then Simran did prove her mettle with substantial roles, wish Nayan picks up some meaty scripts to show what she’s capable of for her being touted as the best actress around and all.
Btw, Rangan what’s your opinion on Simran as an actress?
LikeLike
Sid (@Tweet2Sid)
May 10, 2014
@BR
Parvathy Menon is there in Uttama Villain. Then there’s one Parvathy Nair too.
LikeLike
vijay
May 12, 2014
“Have you ever heard of a heroine stuck gold after pairing with Kamal? ”
Yes, just look at Pooja Jumar and Andrea, they have struck gold by repeatedly getting cast alongside Kamal 🙂
LikeLike
Roopa
May 13, 2014
@ Rahini David
I was referring to factors like destiny,luck,glamour quotient (atleast for commercial movies), our directors’ obsession for fair-complexioned lasses(though none speak the language) and things like that 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
May 13, 2014
uniquebluerose: So lady in Saree is in “deglamorised” role????
Haha. Unfortunately yes. Even in Bollywood, there’s this stupid notion that the minute Kareena Kapoor, say, comes in a sari, it’s a deglamourized part 😀
oneWithTheH: About Simran… ahem, cough cough… next koschin… 🙂
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
May 13, 2014
Enna… Mr. Rangan, not even in your favorite director’s movie? I thought it was one of her finest roles, if not the best.
btw, talking of stereotyping…. if lady in saree -> deglamorised role, then lady as prostitute -> scope for performance role, anybody in mentally retarded role -> oscar worthy role
LikeLike
uniquebluerose
May 15, 2014
I agree with oneWithTheH
that seems to trend here…..I am still surprised (or rather cringe in shock) every time i watch people say Barfi deserved Oscar or rather PC deserved the awards for that one as opposed to Vidya who took them away!!!
and as for me ….Simran’s role in Kannathil was her only good performance….but even there i felt Nanditha stole the lime lite in last few moment!!!
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 15, 2014
oneWithTheH: What BR meant was that he has such a huge crush on Simran that he is not going to discuss her when discussing mere mortals. 🙂
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 15, 2014
Roopa: Well Glamour Quotient being too important for actresses is something I understand. I just don’t thnk that that particular girl is a good example to illustrate it. For she is already a glamourous person. And skin color is alterable with makeup if the need really arises.
But then again I remember that Meera Jasmine went about saying she wasn’t interested in eye-candy roles and wanted an actual part in the proceedings. “Meera Jasmine who?” some may say in Tamil Industry. 🙂
LikeLike