Spoilers ahead…
If the movies have taught us anything, it’s this: Whenever a blood-spattered gangster falls in love, he will get in touch with his inner twelve-year-old girl. Thus, in Mohit Suri’s Ek Villain, Guru (Siddharth Malhotra) transforms from a thug who douses a man in kerosene and shoves him into a fire to a chweetie-pie who plays blind man’s buff with Aisha (Shraddha Kapoor) and helps her catch butterflies. I’m not being metaphorical here. They’re near a waterfall, and find themselves surrounded by butterflies. It’s meant to be poetic, I guess. And now she can cross off the item on her wish-list that says: “To play with butterflies.” This wish-list is in her scrapbook, which also has this to-do item: “To unite two lovers.” And so they barge into a mental asylum, free an elderly man who’s watching Shahenshah, and get him married to an elderly woman – in a church. That’s when Guru knows he’s falling for Aisha. Twisting a knife into an enemy is all very well, but at the end of it you don’t get cake.
At the other end of the relationship spectrum, we have Rakesh (Ritesh Deshmukh) and Sulochana (Aamna Sharif). She nags him constantly, and he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them. I refer, of course, to the screwdriver he always carries with him. His best buddy (Kamaal R Khan) is even more of a charmer. When his wife brings him a drink, he slaps her because she hasn’t brought any ice. He says they’re middle-class people, sandwiched between the upper and lower classes, and you need to de-stress somehow. This is how he does it, by reducing his wife to a punching bag. She takes it silently, but there are others whose sole function is to spout something that’s supposedly emasculating, and then pay for this “sin” by winding up at the wrong end of that screwdriver. You’d have to look hard for a film that treated its women with more contempt.
It’s probably no surprise that Ek Villain is so bad. It was bound to happen. The law of averages had to catch up with Suri, who, if nothing else, is a good craftsman, a solid storyteller. So a single dud after a series of respectable dramas isn’t the end of the world. The surprise is that Suri found this material interesting in the first place. The story, I hear, is filched from the South Korean thriller I Saw the Devil, but there’s nothing startlingly original about it – at least, nothing that you have to import from South Korea. It’s the standard you-killed-someone-close-to-me-and-now-I’m-going-to-make-your-life-hell crap – imagine Ghayal with Sunny Deol as a gangster and Amrish Puri as a serial killer. Knowing Suri, there are a few nice lines (“Shaitaan se dosti karega to ek na ek din tere darwaze par dastak dega hi!”) and some deft Indianisation (a mother’s curse comes true), but not nearly enough to make us sit up and care.
The writing is so wretched that nothing, really, makes us care – certainly not the characters (or the actors playing them). Sulochana is a fashion-plate who hardly looks like she’s suffering. Aisha is annoying to the extreme, one of those perpetually sunny types who can whip out, at will, something that, say, Martin Luther King said. She keeps cracking these weird jokes, and I think I lost my patience when, while driving, she turned to the Ganesha statue strapped to the seat next to her and made a wisecrack. (Suri fills his frames with Ganesha imagery. This is not the kind of film where you want to dig deep and find out why.) Aisha is not someone you want to hang out with for two hours. I was intrigued by a couple of things. One, Aisha drives motorbikes and Jeeps – the image of the frail-looking Shraddha Kapoor in (or on) all this macho metal is something that might interest a fetishist photographer. Two, she’s ailing from some disease, and the film just won’t tell us what it is. We keep hearing she has a “beemari” – why this coyness?
In Hasee Toh Phasee, I felt that Malhotra’s character suffered from his “inability to do much more than project a charming geniality on screen. (Would you buy him as an IPS officer?).” I felt the same here. Not for a moment did I buy him as a gangster. His worst scene has him running on the platform and speaking to Aisha as she leaves on a train. He tries to tell her the kind of joke that she usually tells him. She begins to cry. It’s out of emotion and all that, but it’s nice to imagine that she’s finally learning what it’s like to be at the receiving end of those jokes. Deshmukh fares slightly better, but his unvarying hangdog expression only compounds our impatience with a character who’s already such a bore. We never feel that creepy thing we feel in our stomachs when we’re watching a good serial-killer movie. This may also be the result of all the unintentional comedy. Shaad Randhawa plays a cop who’s out to thwart Guru’s attempts at getting to Rakesh, but eventually, even he grows tired of pretending he cares about what’s going on. “Go kill him,” he tells Guru, with an eye on the cold beer waiting for him at home after pack-up. And Remo Fernandes is hilarious as a Goan don of the seas. He has a ponytail, naturally. I don’t think you can be a crime boss in Goa if you don’t have a ponytail. He vanishes for a long stretch and pops up like a genie towards the end, killing someone and hastening the arrival of the final scenes. His eye was probably on the beer too.
KEY:
* Ek Villain= A villain
* Shahenshah = see here
* Kamaal R Khan = see here
* I Saw the Devil = see here
* Ghayal = see here
* “Shaitaan se dosti karega to ek na ek din tere darwaze par dastak dega hi!” = If you make friends with the devil, he will knock on your door one day.
* beemari = illness
* Hasee Toh Phasee = see here
* unintentional comedy = see here
* Remo Fernandes = see here
Copyright ©2014 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Ceaser
June 28, 2014
and he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them
U R back with a bang. Brangan saar, the review is a riot
LikeLike
Abhirup
June 28, 2014
I wanted to thrust something long and hard, if not necessarily red, into both Siddharth Malhotra and Mohit Suri when the former was juxtaposed with Amitabh Bachchan, clearly intending us to see this chocolate boy as some kind of new age Angry Young Man. When are these people going to learn that growing a stubble and staring fixedly at another man in an apparent imitation of anger doesn’t make you the next Bachchan? The whole movie is, well, it’s everything you have said it is, but that moment was when I flipped out. Stick to playing airy-fairy lover boys, Malhotra; the rest is beyond your capacity.
LikeLike
Vanya
June 28, 2014
“and he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them”
Maybe I just lack the context to fully parse the tone of this sentence and the one following it, but it made me very, very uncomfortable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vani Mohan P
June 28, 2014
he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them…..’
thrusting a screwdriver’ would have been enough to get the picture….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jitaditya
June 28, 2014
Guess they watered down everything that was good in the original and replaced them with 1. a 90s love story and 2. Senti songs
LikeLike
KP
June 28, 2014
The last thing you will see in I Saw the Devil is butterfly, I dont think that movies violence would be allowed by our censors. Its a sick movie.
-KP
LikeLike
cl
June 28, 2014
‘and he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them’…
did not expect this from you…very disappointed.
LikeLike
Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar
June 28, 2014
I found Shraddha Kapoor VERY charming. *Note very in caps*
I still remember the gyaan she imparted in the film, especially this one: “Jab tak hum kisi ke hamdard nahin ban jaate, hum dard se aur dard hum se judaa nahin ho sakta.”
LikeLike
Infrequent Ranter
June 28, 2014
‘Whenever a blood-spattered gangster falls in love, he will get in touch with his inner twelve-year-old girl’
….Gold.
http://infrequentranter.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
MANK
June 28, 2014
This sid malhotra seems to be a one trick pony like imran khan.Good only in hasee to phasee kind of roles.he seems to be going the Imran khan way by doing kidnap, outim2 kind of roles.
As for ‘I saw the devil’, you could call it brilliant or sick depending upon your tastes.But one thing, i found it to be really taut and thrilling., very disturbing though. This adaptation proves the point you made in a recent thread about how our format of songs and romance does not allow for good action movies. You can add taut thrillers too to that.Great review as always btw.
Re: thrusting something long and red – i thought that was just a typical fun Brangan comment. I dont understand how it is unexpected from him and please lets desist from advising him how he must be framing his sentences.
LikeLike
Vanya
June 29, 2014
“Re: thrusting something long and red – i thought that was just a typical fun Brangan comment.’
Again, maybe I completely misunderstood the point, but to me, the two sentences evoked a strong image of sexual violence — not something I tend to associate with fun or humor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sam
June 29, 2014
MANK-“This adaptation proves the point you made in a recent thread about how our format of songs and romance does not allow for good action movies. You can add taut thrillers too to that.”
I disagree. The film was let down by the script and direction, not the songs and romance. Honestly I felt the vibe that the music and the doomed romance created were what the film most had going for it. I liked the flashbacks the best parts. Other than that it was a so-so revenge film.
I wasn’t bothered by what it took from I Saw The Devil but I was very bothered by the music from Dexter!
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 29, 2014
“The story, I hear, is filched from the South Korean thriller I Saw the Devil,”
— Oh god, no, that movie is an absolute classic, relentless, fat-free, taut and merciless.
LikeLike
Karthik
June 29, 2014
‘and he lashes out by dropping in on women who are alone and thrusting something long and red and hard into them’
Very unlike Rangan – the line just popped out of the review and made go, ‘Am I really reading a Rangan review?’. Don’t recall him using such obviously gimmicky lines, in a very long time (or has he used them at all?).
LikeLike
brangan
June 29, 2014
Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar: Really? I find her somewhat bland — sweet-looking and all, but no personality.
Vanya/cl: I agree. Looking back, I feel that that line wasn’t the best way to word what I wanted to do, which is to suggest the “phallic symbol” nature of the weapon. (See here)
LikeLiked by 1 person
nikhilrkutty
June 29, 2014
MANK: “I dont understand how it is unexpected from him and please lets desist from advising him how he must be framing his sentences.”
– It’s unexpected because as far as I am aware, BR hasn’t invoked images of sexual assault in such a flippant way ever before. Nobody is advising BR on how to frame his sentences. It’s just feedback. We know from the evidence of countless pieces before this that this was an uncharacteristically insensitive line from him and we also know that he is open to criticism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
cl
June 29, 2014
Thanks 🙂
LikeLike
MANK
June 29, 2014
nikhilrkutty & others
I hope i dont come across as insensitive here. But snappy , funny lines have always been hallmark of Brangan’s pieces.He hasnt shied away from using sexually risque statements before and he uses them rather tastefully. Being a compulsive reader of his articles for a long time now, i didnt find anything unusual or unexpected about them. If he crossed the line this time or not , well thats matter of subjective opinion. Being a man- the way i process that statement would be different from the way a women does and i can understand that. Well if you felt bad about it then thats how you people feel, i have no argument with that and my criticism was not against that sentiment . As far as criticism goes, well we should criticize him for his views or ideas that he expresses through the pieces (and i have done that a lot myself). Somebody was commenting about how the sentence should have been differently worded or how he should have used this word instead of that and all. My criticism was against that. The architecture of the piece belongs to the writer. Now if we start asking him to make changes in that too, then where will it end?.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
June 29, 2014
@Sam. i do believe that songs are major speed breakers in the case of taut thrillers . Whether the makers of this film intended to be a thriller or just a regular hindi masala fare is another matter and also, i was saying that in relation to the original ‘I saw the devil’. As venkatesh said, it was taut and fat free and relentless. The moment you add the extra fat of romance and songs, the whole theme becomes pointless.Usually when you have watched both versions , then you cant help but compare the two and judge what went wrong in this version or that.. I absolutely agree that script, direction and performances were below par in Ek villain.
LikeLike
Abhirup
June 29, 2014
I don’t find that sentence of Mr. Rangan’s objectionable, because I am pretty sure it wasn’t intended to make light of sexual violence: it’s one of the many jibes in the review at a movie that he finds ludicrous. He does point out that the movie treats its women characters very poorly, so it’s not as though he is insensitive to the issue.
LikeLike
TheKomentor
June 29, 2014
Vani Mohan P: ‘thrusting a screwdriver’ would have been enough to get the picture….
Completely agree. There’s an increasingly “titillatory” streak in BR’s writings of late. And that’s just an observation, not a complaint….yet.
LikeLike
Abhirup
June 30, 2014
I just hope these complaints don’t make you ultra-cautious about the way you write, Mr. Rangan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
MANK
June 30, 2014
+1 to Abhirup
LikeLike
Radhika
July 6, 2014
I am surprised at the number of people objecting to that line in your review, Brannigan. True, it was more edgy than your usual tongue-in-cheek humour, but I felt that was more a demonstration of your irritation with the film’s clearly misogynistic streak than it was you trying to indulge in salacious innuendo.
LikeLike
chhote saab
July 8, 2014
I think BR accepting that maybe it came across not the way he intended makes it a moot point. But I understand both the sides. What we love about his writing is his barbs and witty one liners, esp for bad movies but at the same time this could be objectionable to some ( I personally did not find it objectionable). Though never shy to discuss sexuality in movies, he is the last person to write flippantly about sexual violence/assault.
LikeLike
Bunny
July 28, 2014
@BR: Sorry to barge in so late. But why on the earth would you call KRK a charmer? Seriously?
LikeLike
brangan
July 28, 2014
Bunny: Uh, that was sarcastic…
LikeLiked by 1 person