Spoilers ahead…
Rajathanthiram is a curiously old-fashioned title that suggests Machiavellian – or closer home, Chanakyan – deviousness in matters of statecraft, and it’s perhaps the only false note in this very twisty, modern-day thriller. Arjun (Veera) is a small-time conman and, at least initially, he’s content lording over his teensy-weensy empire of crime, with equally small-time lieutenants Austin (Darbuka Siva) and Deva (Ajai Prasath). They think in terms of tens of thousands. But something bigger lies in wait. Think about those names for an instant. Arjun. Deva. Then there’s a criminal mastermind who goes by Madhavan Iyer (Ilavarasu), a name that brings to mind Krishna, that most blithely Machiavellian of gods. And the events in the film unfold around the public shaming of a businessman named… Dharma (Naren). Not to stretch a slender thread too far, but at some level, the director AG Amid appears to be straining for an epic. Maybe the title isn’t such a mistake after all.
Despite the all-pervading lawlessness, Rajathanthiram is a very moral movie. It quotes a line from the Bible about the wages of sin. It is about the righting of grievous wrongs – and the battleground is a major jewelry store. (I’m pulling at that slender thread again, but it’s called Sathyaa Jewellers.) The warring clans are thieves. We are in a heist movie, but with a difference. Everyone knows about the heist – the ones doing the planning, naturally, but also Azhagappan (a superb Pattiyal K. Shekar), the owner of the jewelry store that’s the target of the heist. Even the cops are in on it. Imagine someone who’s planning a surprise birthday party when the person whose birthday it is knows about it, not just that it’s going to happen but where and the number of guests and who they are and what presents they’re bringing along. How do you still maintain the element of surprise? That’s the task AG Amid takes on, and he throws one hell of a bash.
One way to make these movies is to think like an engineer – oil the gears and set in motion a giant entertainment machine, whose pleasures come from the breathtaking slickness of it all. But Amid likes the messiness of life. He likes friction. Consider the marvelous stretch where Arjun and his cohorts set out to steal a bag filled with cash. Things keep going wrong. In some heist movies, we see what happens when things work out the way they’re meant to – we hear the hum of efficiency. Here, we see what happens when those plans fail, and you have to think up a Plan B, on the spot. The beauty of the Plan B here is that it’s a mess. It unwittingly ropes in a bystander. A security guard joins the fray. It’s chaos. And that’s how it should be, because if Arjun was capable of dreaming up a watertight Plan B, then he wouldn’t be here. He’d be alongside George Clooney and Brad Pitt in one of the Ocean’s Eleven movies, casing a Las Vegas casino.
Rajathanthiram references Soodhu Kavvum in a scene where a television set is playing the song Kaasu, panam… The immediate takeaway is that this, too, is a film about a bunch of crooks after, well, kaasu, panam… But the similarities don’t end there. Like Soodhu Kavvum, this is a film that assumes that there is an audience out there for smartly packaged entertainment. It is a film made for the love of cinema and not from fear of the box office. It’s evocatively shot (SR Kadhir), has a super-stylish background score (Sandeep Chowta), and the writing is unafraid to take its time. This results in some pacing issues, especially in the second half, but that’s a minor trade-off. What’s important is that the scenes breathe, and the characters register strongly.
Arjun falls for Michelle (Regina Cassandra), who works for an Amway-type outfit. She’s as defined by her job, by her need for money, as Arjun is – and she even gets a line about what it is to be a working girl in the midst of swarms of leering men. I felt she could have been given more to do, but even this much is more than what most of our heroines end up doing. Even minor characters end up doing interesting things, like the hotel manager who – thanks to the scanner at the entrance – has seen what’s inside the bag that’s been stolen from the room of a guest. And the people Arjun has conned keep reappearing around him, which, again, feels right. This isn’t that big a city, after all. Veera had a very strange role in the ill-conceived Nadunisi Naaigal and we couldn’t really make out what he could or couldn’t do, but here he comes across as a relaxed screen presence. He blends effortlessly into the ensemble.
Darbuka Siva, though, walks off with the film in his pocket. He has a great face for the movies (he may remind you of Dominique Pinon), and at a time comedy has been reduced to tired one-liners, it’s a pleasure to be reminded of wit and timing. But his success is also a function of how organic everything in the film is. There’s no comedy track as such, but the laughs are artfully woven in. And you have to laugh, also, at the shamelessness of the film’s sole duet. There’s no romantic track, really, but Amid knows you have to have a song between hero and heroine, so he gives us a number where there appears to be some intimacy when it’s all just in Arjun’s head. This sort of filmmaking is its own kind of heist, tunneling into the bowels of Kollywood, to the vault that houses all the cherished staples, and escaping with your dignity intact.
KEY:
- Rajathanthiram = diplomacy; but in this case, something bigger, more Machiavellian
- kaasu, panam = money, moolah
- Nadunisi Naaigal = see here
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2015 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Madhu
March 16, 2015
This is not played in Bangalore! “I” is still on but not this. This and the fact that Cheran’s JENV couldn’t find a distributor is totally disheartening. I know and understand that this is first and foremost a business, but BR, is there any platform – an online “members” only site may be, where these directors could release their movie? May be after a month or so after the release in theaters…a fee membership thing? Am I being naive in suggesting it? I am asking this because, after reading your review on it, I wanted to watch Burma and just couldn’t find it on any medium. Had to download, and that’s really sad because it was actually a nice movie. When encountering such situations, we end up discussing why we don’t have such legitimate online sites…is there any at all?
I am a little new to your blog, following it for about 6 months now. So, if there was any such prior discussions, er, saaary!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
March 16, 2015
madhu: There are many, many things Tamil filmmakers could do to increase reach/viewership. They could release films with subtitles. They could make the films available soon on DVD and TV, the way Hindi filmmakers do. (Here, they wait for festival days to telecast new films). They could market the films better.
They don’t do any of these things, and, worse, are bound by dictates of the producers council, which seems fairly clueless.
Too many things to mention. The proposal you suggest sounds great, but it won’t find any takers.
But I do think a big shake-up is in the offing. The losses are too huge for them to keep operating this way, like a mom-and-pop store. Some kind of professionalisation is bound to happen soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Srinivas R
March 16, 2015
@Madhu
One option I do know if is a website called herotalkies.com. I watched “Burma” on this site. I watched it while I was in US for a short ttrip . I am not sure if it is available in India.Its is a paid medium , a charge of about $7.77 per month for unlimited movies and usually has the smaller releases there, so a movie like “Rajathanthiram” should be available here is my guess.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
March 16, 2015
Such a pleasant surprise this was. And even bigger surprise was seeing Darbuka Siva steal the show. He was part of the band Yodhakka that did some great work but fell apart. Had no idea he ventured into acting. Hope this does well.
LikeLike
Govardhanen
March 16, 2015
Hello
I live here in he USA and there is a website tentkotta which offers Tamil movies legally to stream for $8 a month. They are pretty good and have most of the the new movies. Usually the movies are available a month after the release.
BR : I am not sure Hindi movies are that good in releasing movies on dvd. There’s a pattern but they still take their own sweet time. For instance Baby is still not out yet.
LikeLike
Madhu
March 16, 2015
Yes, options seem a little better when we live outside India 😀 My question was for India, though: Tamil movies as such won’t get played as much in other states. And sometimes I blather so much about a Tamil movie that my non-tamil friends want to watch it and subtitles are not available most of the time (I remember how much we hunted for subtitled copies of oonaayum aatukuttiyum, pisaasu, goli soda and recently meaghamann) that it is disappointing. Subtitles for Hindi movies aren’t that easy to get either – I am still searching for Highway! And I live in France, even if movies are available for streaming online, I don’t get them with subtitles! But yes, something needs to be done, by whom I don’t know!
LikeLike
brangan
March 19, 2015
It’s slightly depressing that your “Anegan”s and “I”s get tons and tons of comments from everyone who rushes out to see the films despite all the iffy buzz. Everyone wants to chip in with their two cents.
But when something fun and original like this comes along, there are practically no comments. Go see these small-but-good films people!
End of mild Thursday-morning rant.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
March 19, 2015
What to do if my “I”s and “NH10″s also don’t get comments? Only comment this morning was for MSG that said – MSG is best for all age and helpful for all society.
End of #ThursdayMorningMilderRant :p
LikeLiked by 3 people
Pranesh
March 19, 2015
I had a ticket to watch this on Monday, before a big release came and screwed it up. I feel bad for watching shit films on day 1 and missing this for a few days.
LikeLike
MANK
March 19, 2015
Brangan,sorry being a spoilsport!,mmm..but isnt this slightly out of character for you.Recommending movies to watch!.I do understand your angst and the endorsement of good cinema. but er….. A critic’s job is not to wave red or green flag in front of the viewers at the movies (Or something like that…)- your words 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pranesh
March 20, 2015
I got a lot of Ocean’s XX vibe in this movie, but was really angry about the romance track. Totally pointless. But I had a lot of fun making fun of the amway stuff in the movie 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
March 20, 2015
Pranesh: But I thought the romance was really a non-romance and even the single song was handled rather cleverly — a box-office compromise done with taste and a certain sensibility, without throwing us out of the narrative, like that awful song by the waterfalls in the otherwise sensible “Arima Nambi.”
What, exactly, did you object to in this “romance”?
LikeLike
Blasta
March 20, 2015
BR is right, this is a movie that needs more viewers, and should they take the risk, will carry them to the very end. A must watch! Kudos to the producers too, it takes a certain kind of courage to invest in such a script.
If film making is a craft, then the best films are those where the craft is almost invisible. RT aspires to such a state of grace, and it almost succeeds; there are very minimal blow outs, like say the beach scene, after the job is done, where the self congratulation, and the in your face dialogue seem so Tamil Cinemaic and out of place to the ones gone by.
Because the film is about a certain kind of criminal intelligence where all the stakeholders are aware of the risks and benefits, the game becomes interesting, but not Vijay-whelming, which actually pleases. There is an insouciance about the characters, and it is carried over to the script too, and this makes it wonderful to watch.
A script (that has been eight years in the polishing) takes its own time to get you interested in them, but it is time well spent. There is that bit of melodrama to explain Dharma, but none for Madhavan Iyer, there are a few scripty contrivances that distract, but necessary, to explain Regina and set the general background, but even that is done with restraint and taste.
As is inherent to such a script, there are the necessary plot holes, the time taken to hide all the jewels would have been more than the time required to pilfer them, but by the time you realize it, it doesn’t matter.
It is difficult to point out a character who has not played his part well, in retrospect, almost everyone has been wonderful, the director not only in control of his vision but also his stars.
Regina, wonderful, and just about earnest, a role that someone like Hansika would have chewed into submission. Veera, having every opportunity to cross the line, does not, and therefore stays in your mind even after the movie is over. Dharbuka Siva, Chaplinisque?
Ajai Prasath, just about right, a (by now familiar) Koothu Pattarai stamp on his acting. Pattiyal Shekar good all through, but there is one mind blowing moment when the emotions flow all over his face, the way it should, and would, in anybody in that situation. The police inspector(?), so spot on, like a laid back fox confident of his talents, and yet that intriguing suggestion of double play.
Ilavarasu, and Dharma, adequate, it is just that seeing them all over again gives you that sense of deja vu, an aspect that is completely missing over the rest of the cast. Who was that guy who takes his eye off the ball, and set the whole story in motion, the guy romancing the lady at the Taj?
Everyone is raving about the music, but all I could say is that it did not disturb, and the one song, so pleasant, was not designed to be a hit, and therefore works exceedingly well.
This one is slated for some awards, and if it is not, it surely deserves some.
LikeLike
Pranesh
March 21, 2015
If you look at it as a box office compromise, sure. It was better than other romance tracks in recent movies. I’m saying the film would’ve been better off without one at all. They didn’t really use the history between the heroine and the finance company guy either. I am just judging the movie on a standalone basis.
LikeLike
jerinasriram
March 21, 2015
Saw the movie just recently and I liked it. Actually I was all set to see it because it got your recommendation :-D, which is huge for a person like me who watches Hindi and English movies more than Tamil. And I’m glad that I watched it. It was just like Soodhu Kavvum – unashamedly grey, funny without trying hard to be so, unpredictable and oh-gratefully without a ‘usual’ romantic track.
I had recommended this article to a friend of mine who knew the makers of the movie and was egging us friends to watch it. She was impressed by how you pulled at ‘that slender thread’ and connected the principal characters of the movie to those of a great mythology. When I saw the movie, I didn’t even register the names and their possible connections. Sigh.
What I did notice was something so frivolous, but that stayed with me for many minutes after. Just like in the song ‘Pyar mein kabhi kabhi’ from Chalte Chalte (1976), where the heroine inadvertently is shown in two different sandals for the same dress in the course of the song, here too in the only proper song of the movie, I couldn’t help but notice the three different sandals she was wearing through what was supposedly a ride back home. Minor direction problem, but stayed with me all the same. Yep, that frivolous. 🙂
LikeLike
Rahini David
March 23, 2015
BR: Done as suggested. Thank you very much. Ennaku ellam “Go see these small-but-good films people” nu sonna thaan puriyum.
Folks: What is the big deal in a woman going to theare by herself? Pretty much everybody thinks it is a particularly defiant thing to do. Once you get yourself on the seat, it is just you and the screen communicating with each other on a one to one basis, right? Why is this seen as such a social activity then?
LikeLike
Madhu
March 23, 2015
Rahini: Defiant? Really? I agree that in majority, women do not go to movies alone: this is merely an observation from my movie going and side-la people watching hobby, so kindly don’t ask if I have any “proof” or “stats” for this. But if you do want to watch a movie and don’t get any company, what else is a woman supposed to do? There aren’t many people willing to watch an animation flick, you know? Until now, I have usually watched them either when they are played on TV or in theater with my brother (who also doesn’t understand this concept of “animation flicks is for kids”). But, I haven’t had a situation where I HAD to go alone, if it comes to it I definitely would (especially if it is Toy Story, though they have already ended in beautifully and epilogues are not always a good idea – that’s for you JK Rowling!). Coming back to your question, someone told you so? That it is defiant?! It might be a little unusual, though in these days of multiplexes and varied tastes in movie watching, it is to be expected. I am actually bowled over by that word – defiant – why, defiant?
LikeLike
Rahini David
March 24, 2015
Madhu: I am not much of a film buff, but my daughter REALLY wanted to go to the play area of Satyam Cinemas (they only let children in if the parents have movie tickets) so I decided it would be great if I chose a movie BR expressly “recommended”. I have been getting the same look people reserve to women who smoke/drink/get weird tattooes. Of course I don’t know why people who are fine with men smoking/drinking are not similarly fine with women, but this is positively weird. It is surely not a question of safety or some such thing that is in their mind for sure. Nobody actually said “Defiant”, for I’d ask “Why” immediately. But I know I would not have generated the same look if I had said, I am visiting a beauty parlour that day.
I have heard this in some FM radio. The question for the day was “This is something 80% of men who were surveyed have done at some point of their lives, but 99% of women haven’t. What is it?” I may not have the correct figures but that was the gist. The answer remained unanswered at the end of the show. And the answer was anounced as “Going to a Movie Theatre alone”. Even allowing for some answers like “women are not such cinephiles as men are”, this is pretty stark statistics.
LikeLike
Madhu
March 24, 2015
Oh, andha maadhiriyaa… You are talking about watching movies, I used to get that look in my office when I used to have lunch alone. I think, as a society, we are very much used to seeing women in groups – going to lunch, movies, heck even to restrooms. So, when a woman decides for reasons of her own to travel alone or to go to a movie alone, it is probably extremely surprising. Whether it should be alarming that the society looks at it that way, no: we will get used to it. As for movie going, in particular, it is only after these multiplexes have become more common that women have started to cinemas more. This is especially apparent in college going, school going girls. We find multiplexes “safer” than other theaters, IMO. So, the movie watching population in general has increased. Contrary to all that TV has pulled down the cinema crowd theory, even though there are way too many channels to count these days, after multiplexes have risen in number I see a lot of people venturing out to movies. Of course, my stats are purely based on Bangalore and Coimbatore.
It is only after I came to work that I discovered that I like movies at all. And married to someone who shares my interest, I usually don’t think of going to a movie alone. Of course, even with common interest, we end up missing some movies because – I don’t understand Hindi (oh, why don’t they subtitle?!), he doesn’t like most of English movies and animation flicks (sigh) and really, how many movies can you watch in a weekend? When we were in Bangalore, we used to watch 2 movies in a weekend, which will mostly be Tamil, sometimes Hindi and rarely English. We used to go to whichever was available, which is how we hit on beauties like Soodhu Kavvum and nonsense like Saguni. Now, that we have moved to France it is catching up a movie online when my toddler is asleep, not that easy. But, we still watch movies, somehow. I am saying this because, when you like it enough, you would watch it somehow, even if it means going to a theater alone. Also, like I said before, when you have varied tastes in movie watching, you will end up watching a movie alone at some point of time. So, more and more, women WILL start going all by themselves. In all this, I haven’t mentioned about people preferring to watch movies alone, because I haven’t met one yet, unless and until it was for work purposes (couple of blog reviewers).
As for cinephiles: my grandmother who, had she been alive today would have been 80, was a cinephile. Whatever the language, if it played in the theater near her home she used to go. My father and uncle would keep telling us (all of her grandchildren), how she used to get hold of them in the street when they would be coming back from work to get money for her tickets (it was 5 rupees, back then) and tell them that she had made their dinner ready and run for the evening show. Apparently, my grandfather (who would have been 90 by now) frowned upon it – all those cinemas with “love”, “duets” and what not, go to bhakta prahlada if you want was his opinion 😀 but didn’t forbid it (quite possible in those days) or think it was ethically/morally wrong of her to do it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anoop
March 28, 2015
Well this was a fun movie. Thank you Rangan. Went it basis your positive review and now doing my bit asking people to watch it while it still plays.
On the ending did these guys really turn a leaf and become “good”. When Austin says he has a golden opportunity to the cop I thought it was not just the multi level marketing thing but that they had hidden the gold biscuits somewhere and once back from jail would use that to continue their escapades.
LikeLike
Blasta
March 29, 2015
Was checking out box office stats for this movie, there don’t seem to be any on Google P1.
There are reviews that you write soon after you finish the movie, and some which are in a more replayed in isolation mode. Rajathantiram is one of those movies that fall into a category called movie maker’s favorites.
It is the kind of movie that movie makers fall in love with, the presentation being so simple and straightforward that it makes them wonder why they did need all that rigmarole in their last movie. In most cases, movies that fall in this category hardly find favor with the audience, I wanted to check how RT fared, so the search.
MagizhThirumeni’s films are said to be such, however when I watched the first one, I felt that it tugged the mind well, but not the heart, at least not enough. RT however does have heart, so why does it not work at the BO, why does it not become a super hit?
The audience I saw it with laughed at the right places, and were intent at other. I was in one of those couple seats, where there is said to be as much interesting off screen action as onscreen, but save for one couple, the others did seemed engrossed, I hope it was in the movie. The girl behind me was laughing at inappropriate places, so I was sure that she was watching the movie and not having hiccups. As Santhanam says, theater la last seat kedakkaruthe adirshtam.
Digression apart, I was wondering what was missing, is it that the audience did not have a off story takeaway, other than saying the movie was good, there was nothing concrete, like say good songs, charming heroines, or other talk worthy points. Commercial pot boilers, even a horrible one like Jilla or a kathi like Kaththi do provide the viewer with extra talking points, and I wonder if this is what makes the difference.
Or does it all boil down to marketing? Any ideas Or pointers?
LikeLike
brangan
April 8, 2015
LikeLike
mirth
April 10, 2015
Spoiler alert.
I watched this movie in a theatre in Singapore. The ending was the one with Arjun opening the bag with the other 2 guys instead of the one where he says “Isn’t it wrong?” as seen in the above 25 days special video. Did they have one ending for India and another for other countries? Why? What is so UA about the former ending?
LikeLike
Cinemakkaran
April 17, 2015
Thank you for the review, wouldn’t have watched this one if not for you. Same goes for films like Burma.
LikeLike
PadathaPaarungadaa
April 19, 2015
Watched this on Tentkotta.
This is one of the very best “local” heist movies and I felt “at home” in this. Great Great movie. I infact like this movie better than Soodhu Kavvum as there is not much of wish to force the proceedings. It is natural, it is like how you start liking cold water and start to appreciate it for its simplicity.
Darbuka Siva rocks. I felt this is probably the very best natural comedy this decade. Effortlessness is simply good.
Thoughtfulness that went into this movie is amazing. For instance the background music of a Motorbike (starting and leaving doppler effect 🙂 is there everytime the upliner comes across Arjun.
I couldnt find anything that I didnt like in this movie. For instance in the duet…Heroine and Hero are shown sitting on a park bench. We see a ball hitting her. That single shot is nicely composed. it is how it would be in a real park bench. I know this is streching it a bit. But being natural is effectively orchestrated. And that shows scene by scene.
Even when Misch calls, the caller id says “AutoRani”. This is similar to Kadhala Kadhala in that we can keep finding more stuff everytime we watch it.
This film lends it to rewatching it again and again effortlessly as an audience.
LikeLike
Madhu
April 19, 2015
Finally, the tentkotta took mercy and I watched this movie. Loved it! One thing that I really liked is how all the three guys flirted with her and when it became obvious that Arjun ends up with her, there is no big scenes involving first dibs kind of imagery – it happens usually, 3 friends running behind a girl and they would talk it out that whomever she falls for will get her and the others have to move away..etc… It didn’t happen here, in fact, right upto the end of the movie she hasn’t actually “fallen” for him. Just that she really, really likes him. Wow, how nice and different is that! Of course, they could have done away with the ‘you might as well sleep around and earn money’ part. After all, even when she meets them she talks to all three of them. Moreover, at that point in their relationship (for the lack of a better word) it would have been obvious that she speaks a lot, flirts a lot to get people to sign up. So, why all this?! He could have gotten angry that she selected some pervs this time, not in general that she flirts…sounded a little off. But I liked the conclusion of the scene and how the background score did NOT cry when she said that her father committed suicide after the Sukra Finance thing.
LikeLike
Shankar
May 25, 2015
Delightful little film…enjoyed it immensely.
LikeLike
Sriram
June 2, 2015
On U and U/A regarding Rajathandiram. But, could not accept the moral nonsense in the climax.
LikeLike
hari ohm
July 13, 2017
any idea when part 2 is getting released?
LikeLike