Spoilers ahead…
So who’s the target audience for Jagadish’s Nannbenda? If you say it’s summer-holidaying families, I’d say not. An early scene has Sathya (Udhayanidhi Stalin) walk into a room filled with actors rehearsing a play, and he says he wants the villain’s role. Why? Because then he’ll get the “gilma scenes.” Try explaining that to the ten-year-old beside you – though, thinking again, that ten-year-old has probably seen more gilma scenes than you. But why does this scene exist? Sathya isn’t an actor. He doesn’t want to be one either. These friends rehearsing the play, they’re never seen again. As this scene contributes nothing to the plot, we can only conclude it’s to establish character. And there you have it. A film with a hero who wants nothing more than the chance to do gilma scenes. This explains the “U” certificate from the censor board, though in all fairness, those distinguished people probably didn’t know what gilma means. As a matter of curiosity, I looked up what the web had as the definition. Here’s samosapedia: “colloquial Chennai tamil lingo for anything and everything concerned with intercourse and sexiness.” There’s a usage note too. “macha yesterday nite oré gilma va?” “machi look at dat figure she is semma gilma da!” This was probably typed in by your ten-year-old.
Moving on, there’s a running gag about prostitutes. Sathya’s friend Sivakozhundhu (Santhanam) is the manager of a hotel in Trichy. It’s a 2.5 star hotel. It’s called Hotel 2.5 Star. It’s pure laziness, but they want us to think it’s comedy. Sathya suspects a woman is a prostitute. It turns out she’s the hotel owner’s “second channel.” Just because it’s the holidays, it doesn’t mean your ten-year-old shouldn’t learn a thing or two. There’s another woman, another suspect. This time, Sivakozhundhu decides to conduct a test. So he plays the song Raathiri nerathu poojayil. Her feet begin to twitch. She can’t control herself. She gets up and begins to dance. That confirms it. You know how spies recognize each other by saying things like “It’s cold in Berlin in December?” I guess it’s something like that.
So is this film for the female audience, those who used to come under the term thaaikulam? Again, I’d say no. Take Sivakozhundhu’s romantic track with Preeti (Sherin). After she falls for him, she coos in his ear, “Yaarukkume adangaadha figure naan – ennaye madakkittiye.” This is not the case of a man calling a woman “figure.” She’s referring to herself that way. Talk about male fantasy. She then tells him, “Enakku seekarame honeymoon poganum.” No females, clearly, were involved in the making of this film. These lines come off like they were typed by a horny adolescent with one hand on the keyboard and the other inside his shorts. There’s more. At her home, she points to Sivakozhundhu and tells her father, “Ivaru dhaan ongala thatha vaakka poraaru.” Sivakozhundhu asks his future father-in-law to book a room for them in Ooty. The father laughs indulgently. Which father, after all, doesn’t like the man who wants to bed his daughter as soon as possible? The family audience, too, is meant to laugh in recognition. This is, after all, how that ten-year-old was made.
When the jokes aren’t gilma, they’re rhymes. Sivakozhundhu runs into an elderly couple at a park. They say they have a grandson who looks like Ranbir. Sivakozhundhu replies with a line that has the words “tin beer.” There are plenty where that came from. Beedi/PT. Dabba/appa. Vilakkennai/vilakkam. Singh/malaikottai king. Ballelakka / birthday akka. Who thinks these rhymes are funny? Probably the same people who think it’s important to let us know that Sivakozhundhu wears Udumbu Mark jatti. The comedy hasn’t just scraped rock bottom. It’s burrowed through the core of the earth and come out through South America.
There’s a plot. Sathya falls for Ramya (Nayanthara). She’s got a secret. She kicked a dog and it went flying and when it landed, it died. Or something. So she went to jail. Now Sathya wants to go to jail to know what it’s like. He could have just asked the audience – these 2.5 hours are like a life sentence. Set to Harris Jayaraj’s music. That dog had it easy.
KEY:
- Raathiri nerathu poojayil = see here; oh, this link you’ll click on, right?
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Just Another Film Buff
April 3, 2015
Hahaha! A-rate.
LikeLike
brangan
April 3, 2015
JAFB: “gilma”-na onne taan-nu vandhu comment panniteengale! 🙂
LikeLike
Viswaram
April 3, 2015
In the words of Emperor Palpatine, “Good. Good. Let the hate flow through you.”. Seriously though brilliant review!!
LikeLike
Just Another Film Buff
April 3, 2015
Illaya pinna. Who do you think lands on your site with all those complex search strings?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Shankar
April 3, 2015
Baddy, superb piece! Folks will conclude that the review, I’m sure, is far more entertaining than the movie itself! 🙂 Seriously, why is this ol’ bag of money so intent on establishing himself as a young movie star? Some folks should just stay behind the camera!
Also, Santhanam is getting to be really tiresome! Or as his comedy writing team might say…Santhanam, naa poi thonganum! 🙂
LikeLike
Priyangu
April 3, 2015
Yup, Shankar. These days I’ve started peeping into BR’s site for super-entertaining reviews on really bad-movies. This effect is what is called “Tamasomaa jyotirgamaya!” 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
saritha
April 4, 2015
I wondered what the word gilma meant. I feel enlightened.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ram Murali
April 4, 2015
“The comedy hasn’t just scraped rock bottom. It’s burrowed through the core of the earth and come out through South America.”
–> Ha ha! Reminded me of one of my favorite lines that Ebert had written – “This movie doesn’t scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn’t the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn’t below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn’t deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.” 🙂 )
From your reviews, it looks like Santhanam has really lost his edge for a while now. I haven’t seen many of his recent ones except JK but it sounds like he’s very much a pale shadow of his former self…?
LikeLike
Kutty
April 4, 2015
Which 10 year old managed to get on your nerves this past week? For variety sake you could have started with 10 and gone on till 15-16. Also kind of reflecting how much you think you had aged sitting inside that cinema hall.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hareesh
April 4, 2015
“These lines come off like they were typed by a horny adolescent with one hand on the keyboard and the other inside his shorts.”
Hahahaha!! Died laughing!!!
LikeLike
brangan
April 4, 2015
saritha: Glad to be of (social) service 😀
LikeLike
Ashutosh
April 4, 2015
I know it’s all my fault but I went to this movie yesterday and literally had to leave the theatre after that silly episode with Santhanam and his teetotaling father-in-law.
LikeLike
Pranesh
April 4, 2015
@Ram Murali: Not just that. I was watching Kireedam yesterday (I love the romance track in that movie, unlike BR 🙂 ), and I was surprised by how much Santhanam and his comedy turned me off in that movie. To confirm, I re-watched Boss Engira Baskaran today. I loved the movie when it came out, and really disliked it now. Santhanam has not only managed to become a pale shadow of his former self, he also made his old self unfunny. Probably because of how much his jokes are a rehash of his older ones.
I wonder if people felt the same way about Goundamani in the older days.
LikeLike
bart
April 4, 2015
Maybe these chimneys should be fixed in bed room and probably exhausts some other forms of heat – http://www.gilmachimney.com
LikeLike
sridharraman
April 4, 2015
The audience is people who enjoyed M Rajesh’s movies, which is a huge set of people. So, I won’t be surprised if this movie does well.
The only movie I ever walked out in the middle was OKOK, and I definitely don’t plan on going for these “comedy” movies any time in the near future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anon
April 4, 2015
Seriously, dolts in Tamil cinema have ruined the word ‘figure’ for me
Maths-la use panna kooda thayakkama irukku 😦 Che, #facepalm
As an aside, super review 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
raj
April 4, 2015
https://www.facebook.com/punchparaman/photos/a.545892595456023.1073741825.446998738678743/961353773909901/?type=1&theater நண்பேன்டா திரை விமர்சனம் – கொன்னுபுட்டாங்கே…….சந்தானம் இரைச்சல் தாங்கல. மிடியலடா சாமீ . NANBENDA REVIEW – LOUD SPEAKER. A HORRIBLE KILLER.
LikeLike
sjani
April 4, 2015
“That dog had it easy” .
Made my weekend, Rangan Sir 🙂
LikeLike
Srinivas
April 5, 2015
I’ve been feeling for a while that Santhanam is pathetic and is bad news for a movie. Time to bring back Vadivelu.
LikeLike
Vidyakar
April 5, 2015
If only they went the whole way in getting inspired from this movie😄
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobcat_Goldthwait#Sleeping_Dogs_Lie
LikeLike
Ashutosh
April 5, 2015
@brangan: One small matter: was it not Satya (not Sivakozhundhu) who said the tin beer line? That thing happens when he tries to woo Nayanthara in the park after she drove out the gilmaers who were occupying it.
LikeLike
brangan
April 5, 2015
Ashutosh: Romba mukkiyam! :-p
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ashutosh
April 5, 2015
@brangan: Fair enough!
LikeLike
DongLee
April 5, 2015
I think your review should also be revied by the censor board :P. That ten year old is probably asking his dad now, what is baradwaj rangan mama trying to say when he is writing ” These lines come off like they were typed by a horny adolescent with one hand on the keyboard and the other inside his shorts.” 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
subramanian
April 5, 2015
Even After Reading your Review I am going to watch this Below Average one. Because of Two Reasons, My Fav Nayan on Big Screen. I Watched Idhu Kadhirvelan Kadhal another Not so Worthy(a Disaster). again for her. Next Reason for visuals and songs in this. Viewing this might be a dislike but would try to find solace in the above mentioned reasons.
LikeLike
KayKay
April 6, 2015
My commiserations, comrade! Know what? You’re overdue a popcorn flick. The Hollywood variety to be exact. After all, as you yourself stated several posts ago, their garbage is so much more watchable than ours. So get your ass to wherever Furious 7 is being screened. Now THIS is masala done right!
Machismo? Check! You could squeeze Udhayandihi Stalin’s thighs together and encase them in 2 layers of plaster cast and they’d still be half the size of the Rock’s biceps. And his pipsqueek little girly voice would flee the country at the first rumbles of Vin Diesel’s gravelly baritone.
Female Objectification? Check. Furious 7 features the largest collection of asses outside of Parliament. Also available in Gold-paint and thonged, they jiggle without provocation. If you’re gonna put adolescent male fantasies on celluloid, do it right dammit!
Physics and gravity defying action? Check!
Filler comedy? Check! Tyrese Gibson is only slightly less annoying than Santhanam at his worst
Sentiment? Check! Paul Walker’s tasteful and classy send-off is sure to induce a few throat lumps
LikeLiked by 2 people
brangan
April 6, 2015
KayKay: Good to have you back 🙂
About the “female objectification” point, have you wondered why it looks sexy when Hollywood does the T&A thing, whereas when we do it, it looks vulgar? I mean, it’s the same thing. But when drooling happens there (like in the “American Pie” movies, or “Fast Times at Ridgemont High”), it doesn’t make you squirm. But the same scenarios here do.
I wonder if the problem is with us or with the way they do these things in Kollywood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
April 6, 2015
Female Objectification? Check. Furious 7 features the largest collection of asses outside of Parliament
Kay Kay sir, nice to see you back and in fine form. Really been missing your high brow humor 🙂
Watched Furious 7,Damn right about the masala quotient.This is the kind of film Rajnikanth should be doing. the scene where the cars fly through buildings will put any Rajni film to shame.
LikeLike
KayKay
April 6, 2015
“have you wondered why it looks sexy when Hollywood does the T&A thing, whereas when we do it, it looks vulgar”
Yes, every single time! With regards to the T&A, I believe the same principle applies as with stunts and fights….Hollywood simply shoots, lights,edits and scores these scenes better. It does help that when a woman decides to go all skimpy (or in the altogether) in Hollywood, it’s with a body that’s seen serious gym time, as opposed to the ones in Kolly whose bodies look like it’s seen serious biriyani time. Toss in the fact that you have a sizeable male population that demands copious love handles on their heroines….and the damage is complete.
As far as the leering goes, in Hollywood, actors who do that are almost always portrayed as arrested man-children (pretty much the entire career of Will Ferrell, Seth Rogen and Adam Sandler has been built on these roles) who remain that way consistently throughout the film until the last act that engineers some form of comeuppance or event that forces them to “grow up”. Or titillation is followed by extreme humiliation of the protagonist, a hallmark of the American Pie movies. In short, there’s some “payback” for the leering in one form or the other.
In Tamil movies, this is either done by the comic relief with no consequences or worse, the hero who gets claps instead of slaps.
MANK: Thanks man!
LikeLike
venkatesh
April 6, 2015
“About the “female objectification” point, have you wondered why it looks sexy when Hollywood does the T&A thing, whereas when we do it, it looks vulgar?”
Finally a subject I know something about,.
While i hear the differences between Gym body and Biriyani body i think the main problem is in the attitude – our heroines (in the majority) are simply not comfortable or confident about their bodies on display. This shows in their body language, in the way they place themselves on screen and the way our cameramen, directors (mostly men) shoot them. This makes the whole experience cringey and leery rather than joyous.
The FF franchise is a great example of doing this right, the old Hollywood musicals are another example – the dancing girls are barely clad but if you look at them they are on display and proud of it.
A counter-example in India – Urmila Matondkar in Rangeela. She was just comfortable in those clothes and it shows.
And with that , welcome back KayKay.
LikeLike
brangan
April 6, 2015
I think I’m beginning to get a little jealous about KayKay’s popularity in these parts 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
KayKay
April 6, 2015
B, it’s been a rough couple of weeks at work. Try to be generous and let me bask in the love for awhile 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Shankar
April 7, 2015
“I wonder if the problem is with us or with the way they do these things in Kollywood.”
Adding to what others said, I would say both. Hollywood does stage and shoot it better and the actors are far more comfortable. Our directors think this is what our audiences expect and produce cringe-worthy scenes. Think of all those Anuradha or Disco Shanthi dances! 🙂
But a bigger reason is how we as an audience perceive things. It’s just like how we place our matrimonial ads…seeking fair skin etc, etc. This is in every fact of life. How many guys ogle at a dark skinned girl? I don’t want to get started on the whole fairness cream marketing in India. Again, the point is not on color alone, we are the problem. We are just built this way, for a variety of reasons. So, anything Hollywood does, it just kindles our adolescent senses! 🙂
BTW, welcome back KayKay! 🙂 Baddy, you started it! 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
April 7, 2015
But don’t you think it’s also other factors? Like how things like eve-teasing are a reality here, and these things colour the way we view these scenes. The “repression/release” element here is not there in American society, so we view those as just sex-as-it-is. Yes? No?
LikeLike
Rahini David
April 7, 2015
I should go with the main points KayKay and Venkatesh have put forth.
Real vs Barbie-ishness: The girls in any American music video or movie have a certain barbie-ish perfection that we are willing to gape at their perfection in the same way we don’t truly feel guilty about a Mannequin’s/statue’s curves. Hindi movies have started doing it too and the associated guilt of leering has been going down there too.
Percieved Vulnerability and associated guilt: We also do not truly identify with them and see whites as a non-vulnerable race in general. Whether the non-vulnerability is real or not doesn’t truly matter as this is mostly an unconcious assumption with us. But when it comes to our women, they seem more real and we feel a mild guilt about being one of the objectifiers of the poor thing. In lot of interviews I have read the girls say stuff like “It was already decided that there will be a swimsuit scene. They agreed that it will only by for 4 seconds” or some variations of this.
Comeuppance and all that: I am not sure about the comeuppance part in movies but at least in sit-coms like 2.5 men, big bang theory, friends, HIMYM etc there is no comeuppance or any guilt associated at all.
Preachiness: Have you seen the movies where the vamp seduces the hero for a 5 minute song at the end of which he slaps her in righteous indignation? Hollywood does away with such things. The actresses who do this become outcasts here, they also have a slut-shaming culture but not to the extent we have.
I am saying this from the POV of Indians who aren’t NRIs. NRI POV may naturally be different.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shankar
April 7, 2015
Yes, Baddy…there is a reason eve-teasing is a reality here. Culturally and due to our general upbringing, many things are taboo. I do agree with some of the points that Rahini makes about the change that is happening in, say Hindi cinema. But it is a fact that we are sexually starved nation and that release happens in a variety of ways…some times through unfortunate real events but mostly through behavior. You really don’t have guys ogling at girls abroad as much as it happens, say in India…again, I mean it from a lust perspective. The first thought would be “Ot@#, avala podanum” not “pazhakanum”. Again the upbringing made it such that girls in general were unattainable. I understand that things are vastly different today but I’m trying to bring some historical perspective. Many things are matter of fact in American society, for good or bad. So, there is a big cultural, upbringing element to this. Hence, our directors, poor souls, are also confused..should we go the full extent or not, will the censors pass it or not, will people accept it or not! 🙂
LikeLike
Shankar
April 7, 2015
And I know I’m generalizing hugely here, but we just don’t respect women enough. Item, figuru, katta…the list goes on. Every time the hero slaps the heroine, I cringe. So, the attitude of the heroines that venkatesh refers to is a result of all these factors. I don’t blame them at all.
In my opinion, this is a much larger conversation of us as a society…and Art does mirror life to some extent!
LikeLike
venkatesh
April 7, 2015
@ Rahini: I think this “We also do not truly identify with them and see whites as a non-vulnerable race in general. ” is a great point. I do think there is some level of truth to this.
@Shankar: Oh, i don’t blame the heroines either, its just a fact of life.
Having said the above, i do think that the newer generation of heroines – Parineeti Chopra, Aaliyah Bhatt etc. are a lot bolder and self-confident , this is a good thing.
LikeLike
Mani AJ
April 8, 2015
Whoo-hooo – I had a gilmasm reading this 🙂
LikeLike
Madhu
April 8, 2015
Keys please, BR!
LikeLike
Srinivas R
April 9, 2015
In addition to what Rahini and Shankar mentioned, one additional problem is the inherent hypocrisy in Tamil movies. They keep promoting these movies as “family entertainment”. After reading your review , I see an ad for “nanbenda” proclaiming “kuzhandaigal kondadum vetri”. For all the flaws in Hollywood movies, at least their version of family entertainment is a Home Alone , Bay’s day out or animation flicks. So something like FF7 or Expendables gets a free pass , at least they are not pretending to be clean entertainment
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aravind Ramachandran
April 9, 2015
You rock dude! Every time a movie like this released, I used to think of it as waste of good oxygen or seethe at their positioning as something for whoever – in either case for 30 seconds or less, that pretty much used to be my attention span for this kinda c..p. Now a days I look forward to your reviews for sure.
LikeLike
brangan
April 9, 2015
Aravind Ramachandran: Thanks — but I hope this is not coming across as just entertainment. I am making some serious points here.
Had I written the same review in a more serious fashion, these lines people seem to be enjoying would have been something like this:
It’s terrible that these films position themselves as family entertainers and then go on to feature jokes about prostitutes and porn films…
or
The makers of these movies don’t seem to have the slightest idea about women — it’s all a fantasy. Their dream woman comes right out of the porn mags they’ve read.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Mani AJ
April 10, 2015
On a slightly sombre tone, I’d like to think, as long as the narrative’s perspective is that of a full blooded male (dare I say, Indian male – with that my head’s on the chopping-board, mates!), his inherent chauvinism, bravado, machismo or whatever that tickles his mojo – coupled with the demands of their perceived target market & their masters (i.e. producers) – these tasteless depictions will remain the norm. We can lament but regrettably, wallow in torment … 😦
LikeLike
Anon
April 10, 2015
Brangan – have a question for you. Why do you think big female stars like Nayantara (now, why she is so sought after, I’ve never really understood. But that is the subject of another discussion altogether) who could probably have some influence on these things (portrayal of women) at least in her own movies, never do anything about it? Do they even voice their opinion – I am sure they would be listened to if/when they put their foot down. Or do they not even find it demeaning and just glad to be where they are, gender equality be damned? I don’t remember you ever mentioning anything about this either. You think they have no accountability here?
LikeLike
brangan
April 10, 2015
Anon: I don’t think heroines really have a say in these matters. They’re so replaceable. I have a feeling that if they protest, they’ll just be shoved aside and another heroine will be hired.
Mani AJ: I don’t think the problem is with the tastelessness. Heaven knows I love tasteless jokes — or maybe I should say I have a taste for the tasteless.
The problem is that this is being positioned as a “family film.” I wouldn’t be raising the point of tastelessness it was just a bunch of fart jokes. This is something else.
Speaking of which, when was the time we saw a really good fart joke in Tamil cinema? Can’t really think of any, as opposed to these classic bits 🙂
LikeLike
Vidyakar
April 10, 2015
kalai thondu….check out this VS Raghavan classic (1 minute mark)
LikeLike
uniquebluerose
April 11, 2015
This was probably typed in by your ten-year-old. OMG this is really scary… not because a ten year old typed about “intercourse and sexiness” but because all the burden we put on the ten year olds now….they have to find the meaning and appropriate usage of the words….imagine the number of Nanbendas and the likes they have to watch to be “enlightened” and “enlighten” other….but most or the mass loves it what more to say…
but then the samosapedia has failed to mention if the word is offensive….
Sadly people still want to take their ten year olds to this movie instead of “Cindrella” or “Home”…
Nonstop laughter and fun is the comment I received for the movie….if this the idea of fun I better stick your Reviews…esp of such “laughter and fun” movies
Rangan sir one doubt…Is it as bad as OKOK or worse….or if you are asked to watch either of these again which would you choose…
@ As far as the leering goes, in Hollywood……
I think the Indian movies scenario goes about it wrong way …..the other day Tevar played after the Shruti Hassan item song you have hero rescuing the heroine…..and I just commented “Here the hero’s character is that he cannot see a women being disrespected”….my little sis snapped back “oh so what was it that happened in that song”
We lot all this kind double standards…Shruti was item girl (at least in that movie) so make provocative moves with her…but Sonakshi is “good girl” heroine….Pick any Kollywoord Star movies….heroes insult a scantily or women dressed in short cloths…and the girl falls for him and next you have song with all kinds of double entrodre…
LikeLike
Kalki
April 14, 2015
Excellent review there. Glad I read it here. Will stay away.
On the cringe worthy scenes, I recently saw one and felt it was done in very bad taste. The scene where DiCaprio goes down on Margot with people watching it on camera. Or for that matter the other sex and orgy scenes in that movie made me cringe. They were made in very poor taste.
So while a lot of it can be attributed to our actresses not being comfortable in the dress or in the scene, it can also be attributed to how we see. We tend to give English films some slack – maybe because subconsciously we feel that such acts are ok in the “western culture” while in Indian culture, they are a no-no.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mani A.J.
April 15, 2015
I wonder in what ways have our item songs & duets have become subconsciously acceptable – the pelvic thrusts, wet sarees in rain songs, heaving bosoms etc – I could go on here …
🙂
LikeLike
Prasad
April 15, 2015
” On the cringe worthy scenes, I recently saw one and felt it was done in very bad taste. The scene where DiCaprio goes down on Margot with people watching it on camera ”
Hope you’re referring to ” The Wolf of Wall Street”. “The Wolf of Wall Street has been officially rated R for “sequences of strong sexual content, graphic nudity, drug use and language throughout, and for some violence”. This movie is supposed to a Black Comedy and the particular scene which you mentioned , atlest I felt it was very funny. Actually there are 2 security guards who’re watching them through spy camera’s which Caprico just discover’s before they do the act.
I completely agree the movie has excess dosage of sex and Drug abuse but that is how Jordan Belfort’s movie life was and this is a 100% honest portrayal of his Life including eccentric partying style. The movie worked perfect for me for it’s black comedy. And it is one of the highly rated movie in recent time with 8.2 in IMDB with 5 lakh votes.
There are some “Orgy ” scenes which are excessive and repetitive but I felt DiCaprico carried out that role with such ease and effective manner.
” Or for that matter the other sex and orgy scenes in that movie made me cringe “
This is the difference which we’re talking about in this blog.We don’t have any issues there. We’ve issued with Movies like “Nanbenda” which are being “Promoted” as summer entertainer for kids with ‘U Certificate” . Even that AD comes daily in Tamil channels” Kuzhandaigal Kondadum Padam”. This is were I have issues.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kasi
April 22, 2015
“And there you have it. A film with a hero who wants nothing more than the chance to do gilma scenes.”
This makes you think cinema should be not what people want but what people need coz with the present state of affairs you have Mr. U. Stalin bagging (read: buying) Filmfares et al for just appearing on screen.
“Fascism is Capitalism with bad cinema.”
LikeLike
kasthuri
June 18, 2015
I love that your reviews critical of stupid lines demeaning to women.
LikeLiked by 1 person