Spoilers ahead…
Aishwarya R. Dhanush likes men who see things. The protagonist of her first film, 3, saw holographic demons. Or something. The protagonist of her follow-up, Vai Raja Vai, sees the future. At least, he knows what’s coming. That’s his boon and the film’s curse. Early on, we get a hint that the clairvoyance comes and goes. Imagine the possibilities. Karthik (Gautham Karthik) is at the wrong end of a gun loaded with a single bullet. He laughs when the trigger is pressed, because he knows the first chamber is empty. And then… the power goes. The second chamber could be loaded. He begins to sweat. So do we. There’s a scene like this in Vai Raja Vai, but Karthik is so sure about where the bullet is that there’s no payoff. It’s the same with the gambling scenes in a floating casino. He knows where the ball is going to sit even before the roulette wheel stops spinning. Good for him. Bad for drama.
This may make it sound like I was bored by the film. I wasn’t, really. For one, it doesn’t run long enough to make you bored. It’s just a couple of hours. I was bored by the songs though. I’ve passed the age where, unless it’s an Aahaa kaadhal, I find Yuvan Shankar Raja’s music interesting. And the picturisations are utterly banal. We have a song set in fall colours, with the heroine twirling her skirts – it’s no Pachai nirame. Another one is staged in a nightclub – it’s no Fanaa. They should have exams for these things. In an ideal world, wannabe directors would face a stern committee that asks questions like “Will you go to Turkmenistan to shoot a song?” Candidates who answer “yes” will be shunted off to the sets of Maanada Mayilaada.
Vai Raja Vai is a light-hearted caper, and it opens interestingly. It’s as if the director is in a rush to establish everything – that Karthik has a superpower, that he’s in love (with Priya Anand, whose character is named… Priya… ooh, so meta… nah, this isn’t that kind of movie). A lot of this information comes via voiceover. I wondered why. Then the voiceover stops and people begin to speak. Karthik talks about plant pathology. His friend (Sathish) hears it as “plan panni brothel pannradhu.” Sathish (whose character is called Sathish) is referred to as “side dish.” When Karthik asks Panda (a hideously miscast Vivek) if he too uses a Blackberry, Panda twists his torso and tries to see his backside, if he indeed has “back-la sori.” There’s a general rule of thumb that if you laugh while thinking up a joke, then that joke is funny. I’ll bet that story discussion room was as grim as a funeral.
There’s a scene where Panda and Karthik take some drugs and slip into the sets of Pudhiya Paravai. Panda turns into Saroja Devi and mimics her exact moves for Unnai ondru ketpen. I was vaguely disturbed that I found this entertaining. I’m going to justify this by saying that Gautham Karthik is such a stiff (at this rate, his facial muscles are going to atrophy from disuse by his fifth film) that even a hamming Vivek is a relief. By this time, there’s a villain (Daniel Balaji) who’s holding Priya hostage and wants Karthik to make him rich. There’s a jolt of glamour from Taapsee, who swishes into the movie like a Bond girl. And there’s a special appearance from a star who I hear is related to the director. Don’t unscramble her name and you’ll see his.
Again, this may make it sound like I was bored by the film. But it wasn’t boredom, not quite. That’s when you wish you were anywhere else. This is the kind of film where you don’t feel guilty about checking messages on your phone, for you’re not really missing anything. I sat up exactly twice. One, when the Taapsee character declared she was a mathematician. I’m thinking of a joke that goes 36-24… but I’m afraid I’ll be smacked senseless by feminists. And two, when Karthik’s parents agreed to marry their daughter off to a groom who demanded ten lakhs as dowry. I know this sort of thing happens all the time around us. But the fact that a modern-day female filmmaker – someone with this kind of clout, someone from this kind of background, someone with the sensibility to make her heroine a plant pathologist – resorted to this Visu-era staple left me uneasy. Why not have, say, a truck hit the mother and bring on a crisis where the hospital demands ten lakhs? That might make good marketing sense too. After all, we do have Mother’s Day coming up.
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Iswarya
May 5, 2015
Just wanted to point out the “who’s character is called Sathish” but wondering if changing it to “whose” would even matter. If there’s been a recent review here that just spelt out P.O.I.N.T.L.E.S.S, this must be it.
LikeLike
Ram Murali
May 5, 2015
BR, “But the fact that a modern-day female filmmaker”
–> did you not get the memo from MPG that I sent you a couple of weeks back? You will now be issued another warning notice for saying “female filmmaker.” And you thought you were evading trouble by not finishing your “36-24” joke.
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just Another Film Buff
May 5, 2015
Oh that’s a bummer. I thought this film will be a memorable throwback to all those wonderful Gautam Karthik movies.
Are you complaining that Aishwarya Dhanush is not Mani Ratnam? Ahem… Narayana, narayana.
LikeLike
venkatesh
May 5, 2015
I feel sorry for Priya Anand – she was so good in Vanakkam Chennai.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
May 6, 2015
Tell me about it. Plant pathologist, mathematician, the whole fanaa sequence and…….badumdish – you suddenly have a dowry problem!
LikeLike
Santosh Kumar T K
May 6, 2015
@Just Another Film Buff,
looking forward to the day when BR does a “Gautam Karthik Retrospective!”
LikeLike
bart
May 6, 2015
Vai also means to scold (vaiyudhal); but its cold for that too as per your review. It is fine only if viewing this training movie of both the varisus was without vaari-surittufying our purses…
LikeLike
Dhana
May 6, 2015
“Candidates who answer yes will be shunted off to the sets of maanada mayilaada”
It’s exactly for this stuff that I keep coming back to your site 😎
On a totally unrelated note, you mentioned the voice overs. I was reminded of Ennai arinthaal where the voiceovers of both the protagonist and antagonist kept shifting, which I found very irritating and thought this is lazy writing. Any thoughts?
LikeLike
Akhilan
May 6, 2015
‘At this rate, his facial muscles are going to atrophy from disuse by his fifth film’
Exactly my thoughts too!! 😀
Gautham Karthik’s ‘acting’ (or lack of) is so one note, it’s almost cardboard-like; just like Kristen Stewart was as Bella Swan.
Also, what’s up with Yuvan…?? He has lost his mojo big time. Another utterly forgettable album…
LikeLike
MANK
May 6, 2015
Aishwarya R. Dhanush likes men who see things
Ha Ha, thats quiet a beginning for a review 😀
LikeLike
Anon
May 6, 2015
“his facial muscles are going to atrophy from disuse”
Maybe I am wrong, but for some reason, I have the same impression of Vikram Prabhu too. I haven’t watched any of his movies but from the songs I have seen briefly on TV, looks like he is compensating big time for his grandpa’s overworked muscles…
LikeLike
sachita
May 6, 2015
Gautham karthik is a dud, is it? I havent watched any of his movies after kadal, his interviews are ok.
And now we can sort of guess whose effort was involved in the first half of ‘3(If I remember right even you liked).
LikeLike
chenab35
May 6, 2015
I m surprised that you didn’t mention in detail abot Tapsee’s character which seemed a bit puzzling. Like she warms up to the hero but remains loyal to the hero.A small disappointment for me was that the gambling concept was not explored in depth. It seemed like a crowd pleasing film though I am unable to assess it properly. Seemed okayish.
LikeLike
chenab35
May 6, 2015
Sorry typo error… Tapsee’s character is shown warming up to the hero but remains loyal to the villain. It would have been interesting had she too ditched the villain and shared the gambling money with the hero.
LikeLike
chenab35
May 6, 2015
Sorry typo error…Taapsee’s character is shown warming to the hero but she remains loyal to the villain.Also it would have been interesting if she was having a share of gambling money with the hero ditching the villain.
LikeLike
Vidya
May 19, 2015
Do you really have this much time on your hands or is this ‘the paid” part of your life? You could have said 2 lines about this (thereby justifying the paid part) and a couple on movies like ‘Annaiyum Rasoolum’ (released long ago, but that shouldn’t stop you from reviewing it).
LikeLike