The following review is relatively spoiler-free. If you’ve seen the film and would like to read a more detailed (i.e. spoiler-filled) review, then please go directly to the review below.
Piku (Deepika Padukone) brings to screen a robust multidimensionality we don’t usually see in our leading ladies. She balances domestic chores (laundry, dusting) and a career as an architect. She admits to – you may want to sit down for this – being thirtyish. She’s religious, traditional – and yet, she’s modern, if that’s the word. She’s not in a relationship, but has a friend (Jishu Sengupta) who brings benefits. And because her mother is no more, she takes care of her supremely cantankerous father (Bhaskor, played by Amitabh Bachchan).
Bhaskor (the ‘o’ because he’s Bengali) is a Grade-A hypochondriac. Plus, he’s constipated, and he’s obsessed about it. (Bachchan is fantastic. It’s enormous fun watching this most iconic and dignified of actors mouth the most foul, scatological lines.) But Piku is as ornery as her father. And a kind of movie begins to build in your mind. You think this is the kind of movie that’ll have Piku thaw. You think that’s why the Delhi-based father and daughter take a road trip to Kolkata. You think they’ll both learn life lessons and embrace tearfully. But there’s none of that… to pick an appropriate word, crap.
Instead, they get a co-traveller, Rana (Irrfan Khan; an inspired choice opposite the radiant Deepika). Piku, directed by Shoojit Sircar, keeps making us expect one thing and then goes and does its own thing. The offbeat rhythms of the writer Juhi Chaturvedi remind me of James L Brooks, who worked very much within the Hollywood system (and in the mainstream tradition) and yet imbued his work with jagged edges. I recalled, especially, As Good As It Gets, which was also about dysfunctional characters on a road trip. How nice to see this sensibility in our commercial cinema, like sucking on a lemon wedge between tequila shots.
The constipation, finally, could be a metaphor for not letting go (by father and daughter). It’s at least a recurring motif. A kitchen sink is “blocked” with tea leaves – it needs to be unclogged. A pump stops functioning and all the water is “backed up.” But Piku is not the kind of film you want to dig up for symbolism. It’s the kind of film that makes you happy you’re on the ride.
The following is the longer version of the review and it contains spoilers…
We haven’t seen a heroine like Piku (Deepika Padukone). That’s an odd word to use in this case, heroine – it suggests not just the female lead of a film, but the Rani of Jhansi, or at least the Rani Mukerji of Mardaani. Piku, on the other hand, is simply an Everywoman, bringing to screen a robust multidimensionality we don’t usually see in our leading ladies. She loads the washing machine. She brushes her teeth (the act itself is unremarkable; the fact that the film takes the time to show it isn’t). She oils her hair. She grabs a broom and dusts the ceiling. She admits to – you may want to sit down for this – being thirtyish. She likes Ray movies. She’s an architect. She plays badminton. She listens to complaints from the domestic help. She buys bangles on an impulse. She unclogs the kitchen sink. She’s religious (she prays to Ramakrishna Paramahamsa). She observes tradition (she touches the feet of elders). And yet, she’s modern, if that’s the word. She’s not in a relationship, but has a friend (Jishu Sengupta) who brings benefits and is mildly jealous when she talks of dating others. And because her mother is no more, she takes care of her supremely cantankerous father (Bhaskor, played by Amitabh Bachchan). On second thoughts, that last bit alone removes all doubts. Piku is a heroine.
Bhaskor (the ‘o’ because he’s Bengali) is a Grade-A hypochondriac. He takes his temperature several times during the day, and his face falls when the medical report indicates there’s nothing wrong with him. Oh, and he’s constipated, and he’s obsessed about it. He keeps subjecting Piku to updates about the colour (part green, part yellow) and consistency (like mango pulp) of his bowel movements, and he even has a chair with a hole in it – some sort of artisanal port-a-potty – for use during travel. (Perched on top of a car, it’s literally a throne, this film’s topmost subject.) Bhaskor probably knows that, despite a faithful and long-suffering servant, no one but Piku can put up with him, take care of him. So he keeps telling prospective suitors that she’s not a virgin, as if that, and not he, would scare them off – him, with his bulldozing baritone and ill-fitting clothes from a century ago. Bachchan’s Bengali accent takes a bit of getting used to, but he’s otherwise fantastic. It’s enormous fun watching this most iconic and dignified of actors (think back to the other Bhaskar he played in Anand) mouth the most foul, scatological lines. Imagine Asha Parekh saying “motherfucker” on screen and you’re close.
There are many nice things about Piku , directed by Shoojit Sircar – one of the nicest is that Piku is as ornery as her father. This is no martyr suffering under a man with near-tyrannical eccentricities. To others – like the cabbies who ferry her around – she’s the tyrant. They’re terrified they’ll be called upon to serve her. And a kind of movie begins to build in your mind. You think this is the kind of movie that’ll have Piku thaw. You think that’s why the Delhi-based father and daughter take a road trip to Kolkata. (The ostensible reason is to consider selling an ancestral home, which will likely be demolished for new development. Put differently, this could point to the dilemma: Continue taking care of our visibly decaying parents or hand them over to an ultramodern retirement/nursing home?) You think the father will understand what his daughter is going through, that the daughter will see why her father is this way, that they’ll both learn life lessons and embrace tearfully. There’s none of that… to pick an appropriate word, crap.
Instead, they get a co-traveller, Irrfan Khan’s Rana. (The character is introduced in a scene about a hit and run. Art imitating life or life imitating art? Discuss. Twenty points.) I wasn’t terribly convinced by the way he’s shoehorned into the road trip, but his presence made me very glad. Rana comes from a dysfunctional home too and his life hasn’t quite worked out the way he wanted – but again, this is no healing journey for him. There’s a wonderfully strange scene with a knife. We don’t know why it’s there and where it’s going, especially with the intermission break in the middle. Then we see it may have something to do with Rana, that he’s every bit as wilful as the others. (Well, maybe not that much.) There’s another beauty of a scene in which Rana, unable to take Bhaskor’s whining anymore, stops the car and gives the old man a piece of his mind. Bhaskor is stunned. Piku, though, is… It’s hard to say what she’s feeling, for Deepika’s face seems to be registering many things at once. Piku is grateful that someone is doing what she cannot do. She’s perhaps uncomfortable being there, witnessing her father’s humiliation. Maybe there’s a bit of guilt too, that she’s chosen to remain silent and let the humiliation continue. It’s an inspired choice to cast Irrfan opposite the radiant Deepika. She’s already proved she can be a good performer, but working with him, her game goes up a few levels. As for him, this is the closest he’s come to being a romantic leading man. And it’s possibly the closest Bollywood has gotten to the Fred Astaire-Ginger Rogers dynamic, of which it was said: He gives her class, she gives him sex.
And yet, theirs isn’t quite a romance. Along the journey, Rana ingratiates himself with Bhaskor. He gives Bhaskor tulsi and pudina leaves to alleviate the constipation. And in an outrageously funny scene, he squats and demonstrates the difference between the “Indian way “ and the “Western way,” using a graphic illustration that to Bhaskor’s eyes must have seemed like a Renoir original. I thought this would be the point where Piku falls for Rana. Every girl looks for a bit of her daddy in her husband. Rana’s just proved he’s got the most unforgettable bit. But Piku doesn’t go there. It might go there after the film ends and we return home. We get an ending that suggests something like that. But not now. Rana knows that, despite his obvious interest in Piku, she comes with, um, a shitload of baggage. He’s a sane and rooted man, not an insane on-screen lover.
Piku keeps making us expect one thing and then goes and does its own thing. There’s a scene where Bhaskor comes home drunk and begins to do the twist to a catchy Bengali number. Piku is concerned. She thinks he should go to bed. Then she sees how much fun he’s having and smiles wearily. For a horrified instant, I thought she was going to join in and we’d have one of those “bonding” moments. But she just goes to her room – though with an added spring in her step – and closes the door. They bond enough as it is. These offbeat rhythms of the writer Juhi Chaturvedi (she also wrote Sircar’s Vicky Donor, which was also about an icky emanation, albeit from the other end) remind me of James L Brooks, who worked very much within the Hollywood system (and in the mainstream tradition) and yet imbued his work with jagged edges. I recalled, especially, As Good As It Gets, which was also about dysfunctional characters on a road trip. There’s a scene here, when Piku is on a date and talks loudly on the phone with her father about his favourite subject – it’s like the scene in As Good As It Gets where Helen Hunt is on a date and her son begins to cough up phlegm. How nice to see this sensibility in our commercial cinema, like sucking on a lemon wedge between tequila shots.
The constipation, finally, could be a metaphor for not letting go (by father and daughter). It’s at least a recurring motif. A kitchen sink is “blocked” with tea leaves – it needs to be unclogged. A pump stops functioning and all the water is “backed up” – and as Rana fixes the machine, a man keeping watch on the roof says something you might hear Bhaskor say from inside the bathroom: “Thoda thoda aa raha hai.” But Piku is not the kind of film you want to dig up for symbolism. It’s the kind of film that makes you happy you’re on the ride. Even the boring bits are a nice kind of boring, less the result of bad filmmaking than a reflection of the nothing-much-happens phases of life. Or maybe we take to the film so much that we look for reasons to explain away the things that don’t work, like the utilitarian staging, or the numerous Amul placements. We take to Piku because it is filled with the cacophonous rhythms of family – the aunt (Moushumi Chatterji) who chatters away unmindful of the occasion, or the relative filled with pent-up frustrations (another form of constipation). Most of all, the film reminds us of our parents, those sometimes frustrating people whom we feel we cannot live with until we realise we cannot live without them either. The scene in which Piku tears up after Bhaskor takes ill may remind you of the many times you dismissed someone’s complaints until the day you found them in the hospital and were hit by a sickening mix of terror and guilt. My favourite line? When Piku says, offhandedly, that we can’t judge our parents. Sometimes we go to films to forget what life’s like. Other times, we go to remember.
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
aparna
May 9, 2015
Superlative though your reviews are, you can only read them after seeing the movie. And I gather from something I read in the comments section somewhere, that you do not believe in giving ratings.
For people like me, who want to see/ catch up with the best of Tamil cinema in the past few decades, is there some place where there are ratings or lists (say, the best 50 Tamil movies of the past 20 or 30 years etc )?
To be honest, it would be nice to know your choice. I apologize if this has been discussed in this blog before.
LikeLike
olemisstarana
May 9, 2015
Seconding Aparna – I was hoping that you wouldn’t put up a post before I got to see the movie last night because I just have to read a review if it’s up.
A binary would be lovely i.e. Watch or Don’t Watch, but I realize you can’t put that kind of an endorsement up. But yes, lately it’s become impossible to read your reviews without having far too much of an idea of what the movie is about. Slate magazine has reviews that are meant to be read after the movie is seen – Slate’s Spoiler Specials and I love those. These are approaching that in tone and coverage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
karrvakarela
May 9, 2015
I watched “Piku” with my father earlier today. We both loved it. Clearly Shoojit Sircar’s metier is the family dramedy and in Juhi Chaturvedi he has found an excellent ally. Your comparison to James L Brooks is apt.
Like Brooks, Sircar also takes “conventional” actors and casts them in wily ways (like Greg Kinnear in “As Good As It Gets” or Kathryn Hahn in “How Do You Know”.) Here he has Amitabh Bachchan playing against type and hamming it to the rafters. Lately, we’ve seen so much of Bachchan trying to be an Actor (paging “Black” and “Paa”) that it’s easy to forget how excellent his comic timing is. (For my money’s worth, Bachchan never was an actor; he’s just been a mere superstar all along.) “Piku” reminds me of the Amitabh Bachchan in Chupke Chupke or Namak Halal where he could have you in fits with a well-timed look or a juicy turn of phrase.
Ditto for Deepika Padukone. She’s not an actress but she is someone’s daughter and within the confines of this movie her performance is pitch perfect. You catch the worry and the concern and also the fury at dealing with an obstinate parent, all neatly wrapped up with that remark about being unconditional about loving them back. There’s also a wonderful little touch at the end where she is playing badminton. In a movie about a father and daughter, this was a delicious gesture.
There were lots of other little flourishes that I’m probably forgetting now but that many me smile many times over during the film. I’m tempted to go back and watch it again.
LikeLiked by 2 people
anand krishnajeevan
May 9, 2015
i think bollywood is deeply indebted to shit. films like delhi belly and piku had made a great impact. Both stayed loyal to the genre and are extremely opposite. More female writers should come to the rescue of indian films. i firmly believe its because of Juhi chaturvedi’s writing that made a great difference. the detailing was terrific especially those scenes inside the house, if it was a male writer he wont be able to do justice to this story and also the humor she knew where to draw the line. Remarkable achievement it is.
btw did anybody hear the real name or full name of Piku? is it just piku?
LikeLiked by 1 person
cl
May 9, 2015
Ok, so there was a typo in the penultimate sentence of the review !
I reread it many times wondering if there’s a meaning that I was unable to get 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
May 9, 2015
Okay, put up a spoiler-free (as much as these things can be) version… Hope this system works.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Abhirup
May 9, 2015
After a really long period, a film gives Amitabh Bachchan the sort of role that somebody like him, one of the greatest star-actors ever, deserves. I really liked the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kogul Sandal
May 10, 2015
More manipulative Amit shit lapped up by unsuspecting S.Indian. Knowledgable Chennai crowd exists only in cricket I guess…
LikeLike
Maru
May 10, 2015
First, a huge big virtual hug for you brangan for caring enough to put up two versions of your review. It’s rare to find a writer who respects his readers quite that much. Thank you! 🙂
I too loved the unexpected little twists the film takes, none more so than the last conversation between Piku and the doctor about Syed. It came just as I thought I’d dissolve into a puddle of tears and bang!…. I couldn’t help but laugh out loud. The film is able to shift gears effortlessly between emotion and motion. It was also lovely to see Sircar’s Calcutta, a city he clearly loves deeply.
I hope Deepika and Irrfan do more work together, it was indeed a bit of inspired casting. Nice comparison Brangan of their vibe with the Fred Astaire-Ginger Rogers dynamic.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Utkal
May 10, 2015
Just came back from Piku.
While trying to get myself a glass of water I noticed the expensive single malt ( Oban) that my nephew-in-law had bought when he came visiting, on the shelf. I normally do not drink when alone. But I thought I must pour myself small one. This called for a celebration certainly. So many of my cinematic heroes had come good of late.
First off the block was Vishal Bhardwaj was ‘Haider’ which I have seen thrice in the theater and once on the DVD and it still haunts me. Sridhar Raghavn surprised me with ‘ Badlapur’ which again calls for multiple viewing. Then Navdeep Singh came up with gut-wrenching NH-10, which I have seen twice in the theater. Anurag Kashyap gave a good account of himself in the unsettling ‘Ugly’. Hirani said what needed to be said with ‘PK’…and I had to see it twice to be sure. And yes he had lost none of his artistic integrity in a bid to entertain. Then just last week I saw ‘ OK Kanmani’…and lo! Mani Ratnam was back. And what a relief that was! But I saw it one more time in the theatre, just to be sure. And yes, Mani was as young, playful, cinematically eloquent and full of love for humanity as he was at his peak. And now there is Shoojit Sarkar and ‘Piku’.
Just like ‘ OK Kanmani’ there is not much happening. But each moment is so lovingly written, so well staged and so perfectly performed that you do not want to take your eyes (and ears) off the screen for a moment lest you miss something. Ah…the women in Bollywood! Where do you get all that talent from? Juhi Chaturvedi, take a bow! It is your writing which makes it all come off so well on screen. And Shoojit knows how to stage ‘funny’ on screen. I loved the humour in Vicky Donor. He manages to do with shit what he did with sperm in the earlier one. It’s the nice to see that Shoojit can get a big laugh by just the installation art of the chair-commode tied on top of the Innova. Shoojit also does quirky well. And here he has two masters of the quirk, Amitabh and Irrfan, to dance out his quirkography. I loved the tableau of Amitabh and irrfan sitting on a culvert on the highway, outside the Innova, Irrfan holding the knife in his hand. ‘ Why don’t you just throw it away?’ Deepika / Piku says. Irrfan/Rana looks at the knife for a while , looks at Piku, and throws it. There are many moments like this that Irrfan nails with his impeccable timing. Amitabh, after a long time, is a character that reminds you of no other Amitabh you have seen before. He is over the top. His accent keeps slipping. And he looks much older than the 70 he is supposed to be. But he too becomes the quirky Bhaskor Banerjee with his singular views on marriage being for women with low IQs and his announcing to the world that his daughter is not a virgin and his essentially selfish manipulation of his daughter for his own well-being. He makes us buy in to his character and we share his sheer delight as he bikes through the streets of Kolkata towards the end of the film.
And what of Deepika and her radiant presence? If I write how I felt about her in the film you might think I am in love with her.Come to think about it, maybe I am in love with her. Any way let me talk about Piku instead. What a character Juhi Chaturvedi has written. She is a totally heroic modern woman, her heroism manifested in her grace under pressure. She knows the essentially selfish and manipulative nature of her father, but she says, ‘We don’t judge our parents’. She is doing the best she can , blancing her work, her household duties, and if she needs the help of her part-time lovers to get by, she will take them on her stride. As Irrfan/Rana says in his inimitable deadpan style ‘ Aap to ..jaise aapke papa kehte the..unki tarah ho gayi..annie Besant, Rani Lakshmi Bai…mahan aurat.”
The relationship between Ran and Piku is written so well. And so is the detailing of Irrfan’s family, his sister, his mother, and his Saudi background. It adds so much texture to the tale. And yes, Shoojit is so good in bringing out the natural manly charms of noth-Indian men, with all their aggression and lack of fine culture, pitted against the at-times-pretentious but always pompous cultural snobbery of the Bengalis ( Amitabh introduces Irrfan as the non-Bengali Chaudhury.) He did it with the Ayushman Khurana character in Vicky Donor,and he does it with Irrfan / Rana here.
And yes, how can I forget? The music. I was bowled over by it. The songs were exquisite. And the words, even in Hindi, managed to retain the expressionistic freshness that we know Anupam’s Bengali lyrics for. The background score too was top-notch, with a very catchy Indian strings hook that propels the story at a pleasant, comfortable pace.
Ps: I have poured myself another small one of the single malt. Maybe I will write something on Ok Kanmani now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
venkatesh
May 10, 2015
BR : Thanks for the spoiler free version for us on the road NRI’s
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utkal
May 10, 2015
BR: Just read the review. Loved it. Especially the line, ” There’s none of that… to pick an appropriate word, crap.” I am glad you picked up the knife scene and the scene where Irrfan gives it to Amitabh, and the key insights of us not judging our parents and Piku being the ‘heroine’ of the film. There were many singularities in this delightful little film and you have brought them all out.
LikeLike
olemisstarana
May 10, 2015
Thanks! Now if you could do that for a movie I haven’t seen…. j/k j/k, thanks BR.
I loved the movie. Loved AB as well. Buuuut… I haaaaated Mehmood’s turn in Padosan, being a “madrasi” myself (Telugu, same difference for those who don’t care). Would I be as charitable as a Bengali? I would really give a lot – even my upcoming Daily Show audience tickets to see Utpal Dutt in that role. Bachchan does fill up the frame though, doesn’t he? Almost always in a good way.
(Some spoilers.)
Other things –
— I do really love Padukone. She’s become quite the leading lady.
— This is from the Wiki plot summary of the story –
“Piku picks up the pieces of Rana’s romantic notions and reciprocates in subtly silent manner, and ends up as a lady’s casual pull on a man’s heartstrings. The senility finally hits Bhaskar hardly, this affects Piku and people surrounding the family. Deteriorating Bhaskar decides he needs to take a trip to Kolkata to visit his ancestral home and his brother. Piku bends her snippy behavior to ensure everything falls back to their childish-dysfunctional ways. Piku, Rana and Bhaskar finally makes Road trip to Kolkata as per as Bhaskar’s wishes. Bhaskar gets reaquainted with everyone and with his hometown. An invigorated Bhaskar travels in and around Kolkata by cycle and expires peacefully after a “divine dump”. ”
Who writes this stuff? “… a lady’s casual pull on a man’s heartstrings”? A millennial Austen?
— Piku is a single working woman who is very honest about her own reality as a young, vital female being – yes, she has needs, and no she is not coy about them, and neither is she making a statement. It is what it is, and never have I ever seen such a grown up way of treating this in Hindi cinema. Dr. Srivastava’s almost embarrassed aside to Piku at the end was such a wonderful feint at the end of the movie…
— Shit becomes so normal as the movie progresses – Piku talks about it at dinner with a prospective gentleman without even realizing the effect it might have, and so does Rana – eventually.
— The picture we see at the beginning of the movie – that of Piku’s mom – looked suspiciously like a younger Rekha…?
LikeLike
pankaj1905
May 10, 2015
Wonderfully written like always, Sir. The movie will go down as a landmark film for its feminism. When was the last time, we saw such a refreshing openness about a woman’s sexual needs in a mainstream film. The movie reminded me a bit about Finding Fanny – the dysfunctional family part. One thing was when Rana said this line that death and shit can come anytime anywhere, I was reminded of the line from Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna, when Sam says that mohabbat aur maut dono bin bulaye mehman hai 🙂 But somehow, I did not like the shit-related jokes and everyone around me was laughing like crazy, I thought maybe something is wrong me 😦 But so many layers which you have written about are terrific. Thank you.
LikeLike
aparna
May 10, 2015
Thank you so much for the double version
LikeLike
brangan
May 10, 2015
Kogul Sandal: Ah, a genuine troll sighting. Thank you for stopping by. Your kind is quite rare in these parts. Do give my best to your comrades in the rediff comments section 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
neena
May 10, 2015
To show a leading lady dusting or brushing her teeth is not that uncommon to be extraordinary, no? What’s with strong everywoman heroines being architects?
I for one didn’t like the spoiler free review. It seemed to be disconnected at parts, until I read the spoiler filled one and realised the connecting sentences were in there!
LikeLike
brangan
May 10, 2015
karrvakarela: Clearly Shoojit Sircar’s metier is the family dramedy…
Also, if you haven’t, do check out his first film, Yahaan. I haven’t seen it in a while, but remember being quite impressed by it. Can’t seem to locate the review though.
About the Brooks comparison, it’s also because of the slightly abrasive edge to the characters and the dialogue. It’s nice to find people who aren’t afraid to be… unlikeable.
There’s also a wonderful little touch at the end where she is playing badminton. In a movie about a father and daughter, this was a delicious gesture.
Ah, lovely catch. Thanks 🙂
olemisstarana: Yes, she did look like Rekha in her I’m-wearing-sindoor-and-staring-into-gauzy-lights-for-my-Cine-Blitz-cover-shoot phase.
neena:It’s all about context, no? Which leading lady of a mainstream film of late (and of Deepika’s star stature) have you seen doing these “simple” domestic things — without making a big show of it, just like we would as part of our lives? The point isn’t that these are remarkable things by themselves. The point is that along with the things that make Piku unique (architect, daughter to such a father), we also see a lot of things that make her like everyone else. That’s no mean thing in my book.
For me, it’s always about context. Take the Tamil film Thuppakki. The hero Vijay is shown with a Rubik’s cube. By itself, this is nothing. But seen from a mass-hero POV — where the attempt is always to show the hero as “one of the masses” and not very educated and not very sophisticated etc. — this is quite interesting. These heroes are usually shown as “street smart.” The Rubik’s cube shows this one as more than that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gargi Mehra
May 10, 2015
Minutes before the movie started, a notification for this post popped up in my feed. I instantly shut off my phone and watched the movie in peace. No offence Mr. Rangan! But I just didn’t want my viewing to be coloured by the review.
As a Bong I greatly enjoyed this film. I took my 78-year-old father along to see it, mainly to warn him not to be a cantankerous old bat like AB’s character. I told my sister the purpose of taking him for the movie, and she said, “But he’s already annoying like that!”
It’s been a long time since I’ve cried so much with laughter while watching a movie. I don’t know if non-Bengalis can get as much pleasure out of this movie as Bongs can, but for a family like mine (ex-CR Park Bongs) it was even more awesome! I’m look forward to a repeat viewing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
rajandr
May 10, 2015
Sir Tamil cinema has already dealt with the chapter of showing heroines brushing their teeth. Look at this scene from Tamil movie Raja Rani where Nazriya is introduced showing fulfilling her morning duties.
Also far more dashing and liberating thing this modern girl Piku is doing is pre marital sex and that too on her own terms which I find no mention in your review.
She ignores Sayed’s call initially. It’s her boss who she is sleeping with and that too only when she wants. I don’t want to be judgemental here but liberal woman should avoid sleeping with men in power of their professional life so that their feminist values aren’t called for scrutiny. The guilt next day morning she wakes up to knowing she ignored to attend her father’s condition while making love with a man whom she’s not married to under the same roof with her father was bold in my opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
May 10, 2015
rajandr: Haha, Nazriya – yes. But I can’t recall something like this in today’s Hindi films — hence the mention in the review, that we see Piku both in and out of the house, doing the most ordinary as well as un-ordinary things.
I have mentioned the sex bit in the first para.
PS: As an aside, can anyone recall Hindi-film heroines doing things like oiling their hair, etc.? The most mundane things… It may be fun to make a list.
LikeLike
brangan
May 10, 2015
Does anyone know how to make drop caps in WordPress? Thanks.
LikeLike
aparna
May 10, 2015
er do Hindi film heroines oil their hair at all ? 😛
LikeLiked by 3 people
aparna
May 10, 2015
Read somewhere that to give Aishwarya rai a south indian look in Iruvar, she was asked to oil her hair. She compromised by applying water and combing 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
neena
May 10, 2015
I don’t know if I can come up with specific examples of dusting or heroines doing any other mundane thing. Perhaps, Simran making dough in Kannathil Muthamityal as pointed out in another comments thread. But it bothers me that the humanising effect is in itself taken as some kind of realistic or interesting portrayal of the leading lady. I may be just put off because it seems like a de-glamming attempt.
I would probably love to see a heroine who binge watches sitcoms or dusts her scooty before starting for work or even has a quibble about change with the bus conductor – you know, things that don’t immediately make a likeable leading lady, but are still everyday things. In a way, like you put it, she is a heroine for doing these ordinary things and taking care of her cranky father.
I loved Anushka’ character in Yennai Arinthaal, for pigging it out in first class, for being a karaoke singer who sings off tune for the ponn paakkara ritual. Pity those things never meant anything to the film as such.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sayalee
May 10, 2015
BR: The teeth-brushing scene when Irrfan knocks on the door reminded me of Queen: Kangana brushing her teeth in her Paris hotel room when Lisa knocks warning/requesting to not tell the manager that she was with someone in the next room – and Kangana’s bewildered reaction with an obedient nod was superb! That movie had a lot of moments of her (in flash-back scenes) doing ‘regular things’ when being wooed by Vijay – also, the scene where her friend is on a treadmill at home with a crying kid around while on phone with Kangana in Amsterdam comes to mind…
LikeLiked by 2 people
aparna
May 10, 2015
That scene in Bobby where Dimple is kneading dough, and Rishi is at the door, she then smears the dough accidentally over her face, looking drop dead gorgeous with her dough smeared face and all
LikeLike
krm
May 10, 2015
kajal agarwal in song irage pola
boomika in munbe vaa en anbe vaa
LikeLike
sanjana
May 10, 2015
We want to see everyday woman in a top heroine and also want to see a heroine in everyday woman. Life imitating art and vice versa. Kajol in her heyday did not care how she looked in functions. Jaya Bhaduri portrayed those simple roles with such simplicity. Anybody remember Zarina Wahab in Chitchor? It may not be oiling but something on those lines.
LikeLike
sanjana
May 10, 2015
And also Smitha Patil, Shabana Azmi, Deepti naval, Vidya Balan and many more.
LikeLike
Rahul
May 10, 2015
“Okay, put up a spoiler-free (as much as these things can be) version… Hope this system works.”
Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
May 10, 2015
sanjana: A Zarina Wahab or Moushumi Chatterji or Vidya Sinha will never become major heroine today because they are too “ordinary.” Even Bhumi Pednekar, post Dum Lagake, was seen in a slimmed down avatar, as if she’s telling people (and more importantly, producers), “I’m not really that fat, you know?” Similarly, a Sanjeev Kumar will never become a major hero today. The big stars are so tied into the marketing of big advertising brands that they have to be like models. So in a way, I actually welcome something like Dil Dhadakne Do, because it’s set in the highest economic strata and there needs to be no suspension of disbelief, no buying this hot star or that one as Boy/Girl Next Door.
The other thing is that the Karan Joharisation of cinema led to practically no ordinary clothes, ordinary moments. Every scene had to have the best lighting, the best makeup and costumes, the best looking actors. That was okay in a film like K3G, where glamour is the whole point, but it was soon everywhere. The tastefully decorated flat where Ranbir lives in Wake Up Sid, for instance. People going to sleep and waking up with full lipstick — that sort of thing.
Hence the surprise when a Deepika does the kind of “ordinary” things a Zarina Wahab would do. I loved the way she played around with her hair clip, biting on it while doing her hair — so beautiful and so… ordinary. The film is filled with moments of such ordinariness.
In many scenes she didn’t even seem to have much makeup on. Of course, she’s still not Girl Next Door, but I guess we’ll take what we get 🙂
PS: I remember Anushka mopping the floor in Rab Ne… Ah, there’s a thesis topic right there: “The Disappearance of Domesticity From the Hindi Film Heroine of the Post Liberalisation Era and Its Tentative Reappearance.” 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
May 10, 2015
I meant Vidya Balan in Parineeta. Not Vidya Sinha. And Shoojit Sarkar is a Bengali and he must have told Deepika to do so. Ash in Raincoat. Bengali charm. If one’s wife does those ordinary things, the hubbies will never notice. In Khoon bhari Maang, an ordinary housewife had to become a glamour doll to teach a lesson.
LikeLike
Udhay Sankar
May 10, 2015
brangan: A Zarina Wahab or Moushumi Chatterji or Vidya Sinha will never become major heroine today because they are too “ordinary.”…
Yep,I think so too. But,there are exceptions. Like,Mahie Gill in Devd. I was genuinely surprised by Mahie, a good actress. Beautiful? Yes. But,not exactly model-like, spotless and perfect as these leading women are. Pity she couldn’t be an major heroine as these girls. I wish to see more of such women in hindi cinema.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vidya Murugan
May 10, 2015
I saw Piku last night and really loved it, but I can’t help thinking it would have been better if it had ended (SPOILERS AHEAD) when Baskor was finally satisfied with his motion, or gone for an “art film” ending with Baskor rising on a cycle through Kolkatta, or ended even earlier when Rana leaves for Delhi. The funeral was poignant and tasteful, but really pointless.
Also, did anyone else feel Piku was just as lost without her father (while he was alive) as he was without her? Baskor, as his character ponts out in one scene, is capable of looking after himself and is not really dependent on anybody. Piku worries and fusses over him like a mother hen all the while, practically encouraging him to be dependent on her.
Lastly, the scene where Baskor explains why he does not want to be on a ventilator could have been easily avoided. It was really quite insensitive not just to Rana ( who deals with it very well) but probably also to all of people in the audience (yours truly included). It’s one thing to go for a movie about a sensitive topic because then you are mentally prepared, but something like this can throw you off balance… for a while.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vidya Murugan
May 11, 2015
oops.. “probably also to all of people in the audience (yours truly included). ” I meant some the audience not all. It’s quite easy to get guilt tripped, even when you are sure you made the best decision you could at that moment.
LikeLike
Vidya Murugan
May 11, 2015
In the scene when Rana tells Baskor off, I got the distinct impression that it was not Baskor, it was his own family he was talking about.
“She (Piku) buys bangles on an impulse.” and then tells her father that he is never going to get her married (and doll up as a bride) so to let her enjoy these little pleasures. Piku hardly seems to be the kind to wait for her father to “get her married”. She has a need based sexual relationship under the same roof and is open about it to him. If she wanted to she would just get married. I think she emotionally blackmails him just as much as he emotionally blackmails her.
Talking of her friend-in-need, did anyone else feel that she was more than just a need for him? He seemed to genuinely care about her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apu
May 11, 2015
Brangan, have a lot of comments about this movie but difficult to type in the phone, so will just mention this: this is a classic example of a type of movie that worked for me in parts but not as a whole. What works: the characters, Amitabh, most of the actors, the dialogues, scenes and locations. What did not work: the relationships between Deepika and the main leads. I have come to the conclusion that both male leads were simply there to give Piku’s character another dimension and to have a way for Piku to voice her opinions about her father and other things, else they are dispensable to the plot and Piku.
Also, yes it is Deepika who is this high paid popular glamorous actress but it is a supposedly “realistic” movie where aunts roam about in cotton nighties – so her doing laundry or oiling her hair did not seen so laudable to me.
By the way, I am a Bengali and I loved the way bongs were shown. Till I got out of my home state, I did not realize how much we talk about our tummy and digestion 🙂 and that others (non bongs) do not.
LikeLike
olemisstarana
May 11, 2015
Pffff rediff comments section. Try Reddit. Or don’t, this is what happens to me when I lose my way for a second: http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/1160261/melting-face-o.gif
Speaking of… did I miss the final word on the comments section overhaul/migration/transformation?
LikeLike
olemisstarana
May 11, 2015
And re: Syed’s position in the movie – did I miss an explicit moment where it’s mentioned that he is her boss? Notwithstanding such a mention, the relationship between them is definitely that of equals. He complains that he cannot run the place without her. In fact, I do remember him telling her that they had started the place together – that would put them on an equal plane. Further it is unlikely that an employee would be able to just walk off the job with very little explanation for days on end. The way I see their working relationship structured is that she is the inspiration behind the work, sometimes brash, sometimes uncouth, and Syed is the sociable, practical face of the firm.
@Rajandr: It bothers me that anyone would assume the default “he is the boss, she is the employee.” And as for her sleeping with him please just don’t. She can handle it, he can handle it. The scenario you imagine happened nowhere in the movie, and your understanding of guilt and feminism the motivations of professional women is rather primitive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Krishnaraj Sambath
May 11, 2015
I don’t know if you read all the comments you get. Just wanted to thank you for your work. Your reviews: a) are a treat to read, b) are second best thing (on occasions the first) to watching the movie, c) has interesting anecdotes, d) saves us time – I don’t get to watch them all, e) provide updates from world cinema.. I honestly don’t mind paying for your reviews, if I have to. Thank you, sir!
LikeLike
Prasad
May 11, 2015
Hi BR
“The big stars are so tied into the marketing of big advertising brands that they have to be like models.The other thing is that the Karan Joharisation of cinema led to practically no ordinary clothes, ordinary moments”
Absolutely agreed. But the point is “Karan Joharisation” is evident but still there is a some sort parallel cinema which runs in Bollywood which throws like gems like BadlaPur, Piku , Dum Lagake, NH 10 and so on and so forth. Unfortunately our Kollywood has taken “Hero Centricity/Worship” to a newer level. Even Siva Karthikeyan has gone into invincible zone from the next door boy look. I don’t mean that doesn’t exist in Bollywood… exceptions being Salaman and one or two.
But don’t you think “Hero Centricity/Worship ” is bad than Karan Joharisation”. “Karan Joharisation” celebrate dumbness but “”Hero Centricity/Worship” is more harmful to Cinema and THAT Parallel Cinema didn’t exist in Kollywood except of Directors like Mani, Myskin.
Almost we’re clocking half way through the year and we just have “Rajathandhiram” and “Ok Kanmani” to count on….
LikeLike
brangan
May 11, 2015
Vidya Murugan: I think the ending fit. It’s life’s equivalent of retiring on a high. And we get the sense of Piku moving on too. Given the constipation motif of the film (see last para of review), Bhaskor has to LET GO OF and not HOLD ON TO Piku. The end made perfect sense to me.
Lastly, the scene where Baskor explains why he does not want to be on a ventilator… was really quite insensitive…
These are the jagged edges I was talking about in the review. Usually, people take care not to “hurt” others, unless they’re shown to be a villain. But in life, we are good people and yet we say insensitive things all the time, hurting people. This sort of thing adds so much texture to a film.
Apu: I have come to the conclusion that both male leads were simply there to give Piku’s character another dimension
Oh, I didn’t feel this way at all. I thought it was a very well-worked-out three-way interaction. Oh, and non-Bongs talk a lot about tummy issues too. You should come home sometime 😀
<strongolemisstarana: No, haven’t made up my mind yet. Was good to get all those opinions, but couldn’t see any of those options (reddit, etc.) replace the “intimacy” of the dynamics here, if you know what I mean. The only change I’d do is nesting the comments, but it appears there’s no clean way to do that.
Krishnaraj Sambath: Thank you so much. And yes, I do read all the comments 🙂
Strange that you mentioned paying for this, because just the other day I was talking to someone who was mentioning she was monetising her blog, and I wondered if I could do that too. But I don’t know…
Prasad: I think the scene is changing slowly. In a way I’m glad a filmmaker of the stature of Mani Ratnam made a film like OKK, because it shows younger filmmakers that there is a HUGE market out there, even within just the A centres, for a niche film. For its budget, the film is a blockbuster. (Of course, it’s another question whether this same audience would have showed up in similar droves had OKK been a different kind of film, like a Badlapur, say.)
Still, as long as the “entertainment” mandate is adhered to — and both Rajathanthiram and OKK are entertainers — I think it’s become more possible to make what you call “parallel” movies in Tamil. As long as you keep costs low.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Rm
May 11, 2015
Piku is at best, a ‘peek u’ into a chapter of the protagonist’s life (sorry, can’t resist the bad pun )…
SPOILERS AHEAD
… especially the one with the sequence of events leading to her bidding adieu to her old man. Though i liked the movie, there is no takeaway for me from this film. I, as a audience, did not have a closure.
Maybe i am used to seeing fathers as epitomes of sacrifices in Tamil cinema, that when they die, we all get a ‘moral closure’ when their progenies realise atlast how great their fathers had been. But then i end up wondering, with so much frustrations around, would it have been possible that deep inside Piku had slightly, at times, been looking forward to her father ‘leaving her’ anytime. That would have offered a ‘realistic closure’ though not a moral one. But we never get to see it anywhere.
(P.S: Humble request. Please don’t monetize your blog, although i am ready to patiently skip as many ads and popups i could to read your write-ups)
LikeLike
pankaj1905
May 11, 2015
Sir, I keep coming back to re-read your piece. It is fabulous.
SPOILERS AHEAD
I watched it again, and this time there is a metaphor of journey as well. During the journey, Bhaskor is singing the song ‘What if this journey never ends?’ Piku herself is wearing the blue sweatshirt that has ‘The Journey’ written over it. During the journey, they form new bonds. Bhaskor’s journey ended by letting go and then finally in death.
Also, interesting was how Piku is a mother to him and Bhaskor is a child. Bhaskor learns to ride a cycle with the help of two people like kids, and when he pees, he wants someone to make ‘su’ noise just like for kids. In fact, Rana makes this statement that Piku is a mother. But in this case, when her child Bhaskor grows up, he is able to ride the cycle on his own, and the next stage of growth is death. Very interesting.
I also found it very fascinating that in the end, Rana is playing badminton but he is not inside her gate, like we don’t know their relationship status.
The more I think, the more the films grows.
LikeLike
Priyangu
May 11, 2015
BR, even I was very much thinking why you had not found a way to monetize your blog site, like Krishnaraj had mentioned. In case you are serious about it, my request would be to go for some kind of donation box or something on those lines (like indiegogo) where readers can send money directly. Would be nice to stay away from advertisements as much as possible. Clean, chaste sites like these are a rare commodity on the net these days.
LikeLike
sanjana
May 11, 2015
I am a big fan of Hrishikesh mukherjee’s films and also Basu Bhattacharya’s and in genereal the bengali brigade using big stars like Dharmendra, Bachchan, Sharmila Tagore, Rajesh Khanna, Jaya Bhaduri etc. for making bollywood smell the coffee or chai. And also Rajshri’s who used big stars to tell simple stories.
Only thing they might have missed was hinting at extra marital affairs of the heroines. Indians know these things do happen and wink at them.
If we read our mythologicals deeply and can think, there are too many hints which cant be missed.
There are selfish and helpless parents who depend on their children without thinking about their happiness. There are demanding parents who make their children guilty. And there are parents who sacrifice everything to make their children happy. Piku is such a beautiful part of reality which we are missing lately. And we do not know sometimes whether our parents complaints are genuine are imaginary. And if they become victims of dementia,it will be another story altogether. We tend to forget how we were looked after when we merely sneezed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
May 11, 2015
Sanjana, i think it should be Basu chatterjee instead of Basu Bhattacharya. Basu Bhattacharya handled themes like extra marital affairs. His last film Aastha is testament of that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Prasad
May 11, 2015
HI BR
” I think it’s become more possible to make what you call “parallel” movies in Tamil. As long as you keep costs low”
Very Valid Point. But it’s not that easy right BR. One is the aspect of economics second is the aspect of Mindset of the Stars staring with Vijay, Rajni, Ajith….etc whose movies can get some budget.
Was reading somewere,, For A Kashyap’s Bombay Velvet, budget was around 30 C when he was having discussions with Ranveer Singh and when he changed the casting to Ranbir Kapoor he could get 90 C.
So Stars volunteering for off beat themes make a big Difference which. The Mindset has to change for Kollywood form a “Hero workship/Centric” films
From a STAR per se, we just have Kamal in kollywood who struggles with some off beat themes but again he has also burnt his fingers many times with out having a good Director/Support cast.
Take the example of “Rajathandhiram”…would a Vijay or Ajith do? They will not. Even if they do this then you can imagine how the final product will be…. it’ll be customized to suit their “So call” Persona.
Long way to go Actually to see “Parallel Cinema” a reality in Kollywood!
LikeLike
Just Another Film Buff
May 11, 2015
There is something about bowel movements that gets your
digestivecreative juices flowing, isn’t it?A lovely review.
(Haven’t seen the film)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vidya Murugan
May 11, 2015
When Rana talks of his father’s death, for a fleeting moment I got the impression that he just made that up to cover up something like his father abandoned his wife and children (for another woman, or a better life). That would, in a way, explain his mother’s rancor too. Did anyone else feel that way?
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
May 11, 2015
Basu Chatterjee made Kamla Kee Maut (1989) which dealt with extra marital affair and sex. Lovely music by Salil Choudhury.
LikeLiked by 1 person
mohit
May 11, 2015
BR: I hope you’re not going to continue with this two-part format for other reviews as well? There are some other critics who put up two versions as well – the MUBI Notebook critic Ignatiy Vihnevetsky, for example, puts up a “spoiler-free” version and a spoiler-filled version of the review of the same film.
But over time, I’ve come to realize that there’s really no such thing as a spoiler-free review. Even if you describe in detail the first scene of the film, I consider that to be a spoiler (of course, I speak for myself only).
LikeLike
Udhay Sankar
May 11, 2015
JAFB: Sorry for being completely off-topic. When I was fascinated by an comment that you made on an previous arcticle on an brangan review, I googled your name (JAFB) and found your blog,The Seventh Art. And stumbled upon your analysis on hey-ram. Stellar work man, really. It showed the amount of passion and love you guys have for watching movies and it was infectious. But, thereon I got all the links for other blogs about filmmaking. And now I spend 5 hours everyday reading those websites and I’m seriously addicted to it. Thanks to both brangan and JAFB… (And for the links you gave on the seventh art)… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
rajandr
May 12, 2015
@olemisstarana I drew the conclusion that Syed was in position of power on the following grounds.
Irfan Khan approaches Syed for escalating/complaining about the behaviour of Piku.
It was shown that Syed was the one who’s approving the bills and damages to the cab taken by Piku.
Both suggesting Syed occupying a authorising /approving position in the corporate structure.
Pinku was also asserting her right to present the design in front of the client herself suggesting a power struggle.
Your arguments showing they are on equal footing.
Syed and Pinku being co-founders of the company are on equal footing. Merely being co-founders doesn’t automatically make them occupy same position within the company.
Syed is dependent on her for running the show. It’s possible that Pinku is into the creative part of the company(architect consultants) and delivers the actual services to the client and Syed has a managerial role and hence her part being crucial in delivery. This further substantiates my position of Syed having more of a higher authority.
Nevertheless Vishaka guidelines ( Guidelines issued by Supreme Court of India to deal with workplace related Sexual Harassment) doesn’t discriminate between superior and subordinate and it would be a dangerous move on part of Syed to sleep around with his colleague. I refrain from commenting if this arrangement would have be advantageous or disadvantageous to Pinku whom I assumed to be a kind of feminist. (It would be an all together different topic when if I start talking about how inherently woman from matriarchal societies(like that of Kali worshipping Bengalis and Mallus) tend to have strong feminism roots).
The reason why I refrain from commenting is not because my understanding is primitive but the story doesn’t delve into those aspects and doesn’t give any clue to reach a conclusion with a concrete reasoning.
My original comment had a passing remark on such uncomfortable relationship because I set the benchmark of a Caesars wife to Pinku.
Also I am not sure about what’s the scenario which you accuse me of imagining and didn’t happen anywhere in the movie. I used the word guilt because it could be the only feeling one can have when one realises he/she was in a incapacitated condition due to ones own act of indulgence(in this case of both alcohol and sex) and failing to attend the needs of her father at the time of crisis.
I hope I have answered at the comment directed at me with reasonable clarity and logical arguments.
Thanks
Rajan
LikeLike
Kutty
May 12, 2015
Some spoilers likely.
What a lovely film! I think you are bang on when you decide not to delve too much into the symbolism. To me, what worked is that the movie does not take itself too seriously (there is something absurd talking about the movie’s emotions. But this is perhaps the only site where we can do that and get away with it). Why else would you have the reveal about Syed’s digestive issues at such a poignant moment? The way sensitive cultural issues were handled was also fantastic. There was no fuss made about women drinking – be it wine or hard liquor. When Deepika gives Syed’s call a miss and then sees him calling again when she is tipsy/happier, we know what comes next. I, for one, thought he would shy away from showing it on screen. In fact, he delays Syed’s exit from the bedroom by just the right amount of time to make us think that he chose to just hint at it. But instead, he chooses to show him come out of the bedroom. Bravo! Similarly, when the maid comes back after Bhaskor’s death, he could have played up the drama with Piku shooing her away. Instead, she just asks her to come the next day. Despite not wanting to think too much about the movie, the only take away that I sensed, ironically, is that one should not take anything too seriously!
Loved Pankaj’s review drawing metaphors. Especially the last line about Rana being outside the gate and not inside.
LikeLike
Just Another Film Buff
May 12, 2015
Thanks a lot, Udhay.
Your note reminds me that it’s high time I updated the blogroll. Yes, I get what you mean. When I discovered these blogs, I used to spend hours together going through the articles. I don’t know of any better shot of inspiration for writing than reading, say, The Academic Hack (the remarkable Mike Sicinski) or The Review Diary (by Satish, a close friend) or Landscape Suicide (the erudite Matt Flanagan).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vasisht Das
May 12, 2015
all this highfalutin apart:
considering the time honoured mix of the profound and the profane in this asylum, am surprised dr.baradwaj pungun hasn’t got to smelling the tamizh pee in the bong Piku illey, jesttu kekkaren… 😉
LikeLike
dandy
May 12, 2015
Sir utkala mahan thi you are a legend. You should start ur own columns sir, I for one will be a regular visitor. Completely agree with you on haider, badlapur and piku not so much on pk and sir please share ur Oban with me too, let me also have some scoth and celebrate
LikeLike
Ceaser
May 12, 2015
Am i seeing this right? Vasisht das likes Vasisht das’ commt. God,has life been so bad to u sir? 😀
Dandy, as long as u ppl keep asking him, mahana thi is not going to do it. when u stop, he’ll start(his colmn) 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Meet
May 12, 2015
This isn’t the only film we’ve seen Irrfan in a romantic, He plAyed Arun in Sudhir Mishra’s absolute gem ‘ Yeh saali zindagi’ which is one of the most in love characters I’ve seen in Hindi cinema
LikeLike
Vasisht Das
May 12, 2015
Ceasar saar,
thanks for pointing out my effup; did a genuine double-take and have no clue how i clicked ‘like’ on my own comment. but no sire, life hasn’t been t h a t unkind; not yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
D'Stand
May 12, 2015
Potential Spoilers for Piku and HaseeToh Phasee
BR,
I have a contrary view to yours and the general consensus on the discussion board:
In my humble opinion, I think Juhi Chaturvedi’s writing has some major problems, which are quite evident in both her films. My biggest problems with her is the use of stereotypes. I am no way against use of stereotypes(I mean here, not just punjabi, bengali etc. cultural stereotypes). I think there is value in them. But how and when to use them, I feel, is what a good writer should know. Juhi Chaturvedi’s characters, like Raj Kumar Hirani’s, seldom have a life of their own. In case of both these writers film’s characters are just props to pass on a larger message.
Such kind of writing works sometimes because it is written for comedy, or the actor is so good and inventive that he or she brings life to character which is on paper so sketchy( in Vicky Donor: Anu Kapoor and in Piku: Irrffan Khan). But in hands of lesser actors these issues are mush more apparent.
For example, take character of Piku. There are nice touches here and there which you have mentioned in your blog. But a character description could not be just a strong independent woman who can’t give up taking care of father. You have to give me something more to identify with her. For example, why she cares for her father so much? (I know everybody is suppose to love their parents, but it is never that simple in real life. Isn’t it?? ) We are never told what kind of family it was like when her mother was alive. We don’t know what things the father contributed in her personality. We don’t know what her personal philosophy in her life is. In fact we never get any reason for her affection apart from the fact that he is her father and she thinks it is her duty.
Look at the affect of these things on Deepika’s performance, when she is supposed to just sitting there and brooding(in the car , by the ghat). You look in the eyes and all you see is emptiness. A greater actor like Tabu with much better writing (Maachis, Maqbool and Haider) will reveal a whole range of emotions in just one look of her eyes. Yes, Deepika is no Tabu, but all her efforts were seem to be not working because there is no much material to hang on to.
The same problem is with Amitabh Bachchan’s character in the film. It is so sketchy that’s why Bachchan has to ham it up.
Such writing never pays off in emotional scenes. In both Vicky Donor and Piku i was just a bystander. I didn’t feel anything. And I cry very easily while watching films. Piku sometimes feel to be designed to make a point about portrayal of female characters in Hindi Cinema. And many critics like you have rightly appreciated it. I am all for appraising a film for the novelty it bring to popular culture.
But to me it has to be fulfilling emotive experience first. For me this film didn’t pass that test. A film can’t be designed just on the basis of a list of ‘what we will not do’ decisions.
And now contrast Piku with my last year’s favourite ,”Hasee Toh Phasee”. The film has its own strong minded Heroine (A female IIT graduate- Phd in Chemical Engineering, now that is a genuine first). The film was much less ambitious than Piku about being a pop culture novelty. But this film was much more enriching experience for me. The film clearly established its two characters, who are different but have one thing in common: they are outsiders in their own family. The vulnerability of the characters was clearly defined very early in the film, so when a scene like the Pee-in-Sari moment came up I had tears in my eyes.
I also don’t agree with your comparison of Chaturvedi with Brooks. I don’t think she is sharp when it comes to writing great lines.
P.S The best thing that worked for me in the film was Irrfan Khan’s presence. It was becoming so difficult for me to see these two stars, Deepika and Bachchan, trying so hard to give a ‘performance’, that it was a relief somebody was doing it all with such ease. For me he was the real star of the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
VikramS
May 13, 2015
Luved the film and your review. Amitabh, Deepika and Irfan all looked wonderful. Do not have much experience of listening Bangla so can not say if Amitabh spoke in good or bad Bengali accent but agree with this observation given in this hindi post, that at some point his voice matched with his character in Agnipath, though to realize he imitated his Paa, character also, I need to see it again, which I do not mind as I liked the film 🙂
LikeLike
Apu
May 13, 2015
Brangan, that is news to me about other communities being bowel obsessed too :), now I can breathe easy (except that this movie might give ammunition to my non-Bengali friends :))
I agree with D’Stand, and his/her comments make me understand why Piku did not work for me in totality. I loved parts of it, as I mentioned before, but overall this film could have been so much better.
I would have loved to have a flashback or any scene that made some point, any point about Piku appreciating/admiring/agreeing with her father. There are scenes that makes me understand that she cares, cares a lot for her father, but nothing tells me why someone would care for a person who publicly berates his child and tells strangers that she is not a virgin. To me (a confirmed feminist), I find it great that a father would help edge his daughter to be independent and not get into marriage if it does not allow her to remain independent and so, I rooted for Amitabh (reminded me of my own father as he has always given us silent support through his actions), but not sure if Piku appreciated that, especially with her constant efforts to find someone to get married to.
(And now that I am typing on my laptop, here are some of my other questions/observations about Piku)
(1) How realistic is it that a girl would tell her aunt that yes, she is sexually active with a guy that she partners with in business too, but that is because she “needs” sex? I am sure I sound like a prude here, but my objection is not to the relationship, but the way she talks about it to her aunt. Is that inserted there to show us that Piku is a “liberated” woman? The way she says it makes me feel as if she is saying “yeah, I have a job, but that is mostly a need and I am looking for something that will help build my career”.
While on that, how realistic is her relationship with this partner anyways? They start/run a business together, she thinks of him as a friend enough to call him when she needs a ride home, and he is around to help her during emotionally difficult times, and she sleeps with him when the need arises (when she is drunk and feeling in the mood) and yet, with all these present, she is looking for someone else to get married. (Again, this might be because I do not understand the friends-with-benefits relationship)
(2) As I mentioned in my comment before, the only reason for the driver-to-Kolkata to be Irfan Khan and not just any “driver” (as against “owner”) seems to be to get a chance for Piku to voice her thoughts which, this being a movie and not a book, it would be almost impossible for the director to show otherwise. People are talking about chemistry between them, I see none. To be it seemed like a far stretch that he was remotely interested in her before the trip, except being exasperated by her bad behavior with his drivers and avoiding any confrontation with her as she was too abrasive.
For the same reason, when Piku mildly accuses him of trying to impress her, or throws the “will you marry me” question, she seems either desperate or too full of herself.
Though, as D’stand mentioned above, it did not hurt that it was Irrfan. By that time, the father-daughter rancor, or Bhaskor’s tendency to disagree with everyone possible was starting to take a toll on me, and I loved how effortless and calm Rana seemed in the face of things.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Apu
May 13, 2015
Also, I agree with Rajendr about that “morning when her father is sick”. I mean, I was not looking at Deepika much, but I would have felt guilty in that situation. Olemistrana, I am not sure how you missed that scene.
I just now remembered one more question:
(3) What is it with the knife in the car scene? Was it just there to highlight (yet once again) Bhaskor’s stubbornness and battle-of-wills between the males? That was a solid red herring.
LikeLike
Prasad
May 13, 2015
Agreed with BR’s review. We need to give credit to the writer/Director to take up a risky theme (Consti) and never made it to felt disgusting or boring. Over and above the the Dinner scene also was hilarious and when Irfan gives his Gyan on this Subject…Kaka questions back “Are you sure you’re not a Bengali”… 🙂 Hilarious!
It’s a very decent and laudable attempt without melodrama . Just to sign off one of my favorite Dinner scene from “before Midnight”….whopping 17 mins but still how engaging and humorous… from master Richard Linklater
LikeLike
brangan
May 13, 2015
sanjana: Here’s a lovely, warm piece about Piku’s Hrishikesh Mukherjee connection. Rather, how the film is some sort of Anand homage — and not just because of Bachchan’s name.
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/columns/columnists/trisha-gupta/Slice-of-life-served-warm/articleshow/47218180.cms
mohit: I think what I’ll do is simply write a brief summary instead of the truncated review.
Apu: Haha, for my father, the question “How are you?” isn’t a meaningless social nicety, to be lobbed back with a “Fine, thank you.” It’s a red-carpet invitation to launch into all his real and imagined ailments, a lot of them having to do with the mid-section. We were at a restaurant once and scanning through the menu, and he said he didn’t want to have this dish because the last time he had it, he got the runs. He’s got a voice that carries too. I’m like “Can you at least wait till the waiter leaves before delivering these pronouncements?” 😀
I would have loved to have a flashback or any scene that made some point, any point about Piku appreciating/admiring/agreeing with her father.
I didn’t see the need for a flashback because Piku is any one of us. We’ve alll had these experiences with our parents, and we only have to flash back to our own lives to see that Piku does indeed love her father and just because we don’t see a scene showing this love, doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
How realistic is it that a girl would tell her aunt that yes, she is sexually active with a guy that she partners with in business too, but that is because she “needs” sex?
Yes, I agree this was somewhat “unrealistic,” but this is one hell of a quirky family, so it wasn’t SUCH a deal-breaker for me. Also, sometimes aunts/uncles become “pals” in the way fathers and mothers don’t. So it’s possible that Piku and her aunt share that kind of back-slapping equation — of course, we don’t see it. Again, all of this isn’t to defend the scene (which i agree isn’t the most realistic) but to say why I was able to look past it.
As I mentioned in my comment before, the only reason for the driver-to-Kolkata to be Irfan Khan and not just any ‘driver’ (as against ‘owner’) seems to be to get a chance for Piku to voice her thoughts…
Agreed… somewhat. I mentioned this in the review too, that I found it most awkward the way Irrfan was shoehorned into the road trip. Given the elegance of the rest of the writing, I wish they’d found a better way to get him to tag along.
But about him being a receptacle for her thoughts, that’s the way drama functions in movies and plays, no? Take a famous play, say, The Glass Menagerie. The purpose of Jim, the “gentleman caller”, is to bring an outsider into the situation and tell us, through his conversations with the family, about what the internal dynamics are. Here, Irrfan plays Jim. It’s a very tried-and-tested dramatic structure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
neena
May 13, 2015
BR: have you considered doing film appreciation workshops or something for amateurs? Every time I have to look up a film or theatre reference from your blog, I think this…
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 13, 2015
BR: The two review concept is great. At any rate, it seems to show how much the shorter version loses out in terms of wit.
LikeLike
olemisstarana
May 13, 2015
@Rajandr: I do not remember where in the movie “next day morning she wakes up to knowing she ignored to attend her father’s condition while making love with a man whom she’s not married to under the same roof with her father was bold in my opinion.” occurred. At least on two occasions she does the opposite – choosing to stay in when asked out.
Re: Piku and Syed being on an equal plane everything you use as an example could be evidence of what I believe their relationship to be – she is the creative inspiration who cannot be bothered with daily minutiae and he is the personable face of the firm.
Secondly when I said that your understanding of Piku’s motivations was primitive, I did not expect to enter into a reading of how the Supreme Court would have inserted itself into a hypothetical employment discrimination/sexual harassment litigation action between Piku and Syed, which is frankly entering the realm of the fantastic. Your assertion that Piku should remain above reproach – what was it, Caeser’s wife? – is pretty problematic in and of itself. Also, I want to gently disabuse you of the notion that you are refraining from commenting/making value judgements on anything – oh you are, boy howdy you are, with bells, carnival lights and a vuvuzela.
I am not sure why you are so focused on this woman’s sexual life and choices regarding alcohol when she has shown herself to be nothing less than compassionate and protective of her father in his infinitely flawed grandeur. In the entirety of this 2 hours and change movie, (where she actively sacrifices her own personal life, calls doctors and has a million medical tests done for her father, allows her father’s often inconsiderate behavior to infringe on all aspects of her personal and professional life, drops everything at the drop of a hat to go on a road trip, wooden throne in tow, decides to respect her father’s sentiments by not pushing to sell Champakunj) you choose to focus on what a 30 year old financially independent, professionally successful woman chooses to do in her romantic/sexual life. Would you have preferred the movie not touched this aspect?
LikeLiked by 1 person
olemisstarana
May 13, 2015
@Apu: She stayed out that night – she returned home early the evening before after her father embarassed her by proclaiming loudly that his daughter was not a virgin. Bhaskor on the other hand stays out, dances up a storm, gets drunk, returns home late, continues drinking and dancing. Bhaskor is 70 and ailing, and Piku is 30 – and yet here I am trying to justify her choices. Hm.
Even if she had done all this – gone out at night (gasp!) stayed out late, or maybe through the entire night (gasp!!) and had sex with someone she was not married to (swoon!) I don’t think she is doing anything wrong. Or maybe not everyone is ready for a Hindi film heroine who does such things. Of course she would have felt guilty if Bhaskor had chosen to keel over right at the moment that she was giving into her filthy carnality but what I am uncomfortable with is attaching value judgments to her behavior as third person viewers.
LikeLike
VikramS
May 13, 2015
@olemisstarana, When Piku sees her father coming back from her Mausi’s house, drunk and still enjoying drink and music, first she ignores the call of Sayeed, but once she realizes her father is enjoying the time, she also goes back to her room in a joyful spirit, she again recieves the call from Sayeed, and this time she closes the door of her room with a mischief in her eyes. Next morning their servant wakes her up saying at 4 AM also he had tried to wake her up as Bhaskar got ill. When Piku is sitting beside ailing Bhaskar, and repenting why she did not get up when her servant had called her, and Doctor (Raghuvir Yadav) says her everything is fine, Sayeed comes out of her room and Dr asks him if he is fine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
May 13, 2015
Add me to the list of people who thoroughly enjoyed this whimsical telling of real-life conundrums – how can we love our parents so much and still be so impatient and irritated with them? And how can they be so lovable and annoying at the same time?
I didn’t need any flashback explaining why Piku loved her father so, especially when he is such an irritating, annoying, self-righteous know-it-all. Some relationships just are. They don’t need explaining.
As for the Piku-aunt relationship, I can totally see my niece telling me something like that. Not because she is ‘liberated’ in quotes, but because we are close enough to have transcended the ‘aunt/niece’ relationship and it seems natural. And kudos for the ‘It is a need’ dialogue. High time that audiences accepted that women have needs too.
To me, Piku’s relationship with Syed was the best part of writing in a film that was all-around beautifully written. No explanations. They are partners, not just of the firm they started together, but otherwise. He is there. For friendship, for leaning on, and yes, for sex. It is as comfortable as an old shoe. It is rather evident that Syed has deeper feelings for her than she does for him. And I think it says much that we are actually willing to accept that a woman might, gasp, like sex for sex’s sake.
Piku doesn’t come across as that desperate to marry either. While she uses it as an example to castigate her father after he crosses one too many lines for her to hold on to her temper, she is pretty clear-eyed about only marrying someone who will accept that her father will come along with her as dowry. Someone who she can relate to on intellectual terms. Someone who won’t be turned off by long potty discussions at the dinner table. And so, she calls Syed to pick her up from the restaurant where she is meeting Ankur – whom Syed categorised as a jerk before the date. And she comes out and she agrees with Syed – yes, he is a jerk.
I liked that the writing gave the characters layers and nuances that made them more real instead of cardboard cutouts. I liked that none of them are absolute saints or complete devils. I liked that Piku gets mad and snaps at her father for being so impossible, I like that Bhaskor is so sure that he can do everything by himself, and is so insufferable that he thinks his wife’s unhappiness is her fault, not this. I like that Irfan gets exasperated by Piku’s bad behaviour, but also snaps at his mother and sister. I like that Moushumi just horns in wherever, without blinking an eye, and not only takes all of Bhaskor’s insults but gives back as good as she gets. I love the fact that she jokes about marrying a fourth time.
I like that conversations were much like in my family at the dinner table – everyone talking over everyone else. Above all, I like the total lack of judgement on anyone’s choices.
(And that scene where Bhaskor berates Rana for allowing his father to be put on a ventilator? I loved the complete self-centredness of that scene where, when pulled up by Piku, he looks completely bewildered – ‘What did I say?” Having personal experience with such insensitive behavior myself, I found myself grinning ruefully at that.)
LikeLiked by 3 people
olemisstarana
May 14, 2015
@VikramS – thanks! I can’t believe I missed that… but I do not think this makes any difference to my larger point. I suppose I’m just not that preoccupied by Piku and what (or who) she chooses to do.
LikeLike
Apu
May 14, 2015
Olemisstarana:
Umm, I think you are overreacting to my statement. Please read it again 🙂
My comment was not about judging Piku for having sex while (unknown to her) her father’s BP dropped too low. My comment was pointing out the scene to you because your reply to Rajendr was that you do not remember the scene being there. Also, it is not about how I or you or the audience feels towards Piku. Given Piku’s equation with her father (as you mentioned, she was doing those million medical tests for him), her expressions bordered on panic and guilt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apu
May 14, 2015
Anu Warrier: It might be true about the aunt-niece-but-friend relationship. Maybe because I have never been in a relationship like that, and Piku supposedly is more from my generation, I felt it was a little odd to be having her mention the “sex as a need” dialogue.
As for : ” High time that audiences accepted that women have needs too”
But really, this movie was not trying to make a statement, no? It was just being supposedly realistic. So, even if a man had mentioned, let us say,to his uncle, that yeah I sleep with this woman who is my colleague and good friend, but it is only for need, so I am looking for a bride and my mother is interfering with it, it still does not sound very realistic in this scenario.
Also, I still do not get the relationship with Syed. It might be a ‘old shoe’ relationship if they were also not attracted to each other sexually. If a relationship has caring/concern + understanding + respect (they are professional partners) +sexual attraction, to me that equates to a potential life partner. Take any of the elements out, i.e. caring, understanding, respect but no attraction or professional respect and sexual relationship but no caring and understanding, then there would be something missing and hence, the search for a different person.
Actually I am not mentioning this for arguing, I do enjoy and learn a lot from the discussions on this board. I am just trying to explain why some of the scenes struck discordant notes with me.
Otherwise, yes, it is great that all the characters had layers, like they do in real life.
LikeLike
An Jo
May 14, 2015
@ Karrvakarela: Here he has Amitabh Bachchan playing against type and hamming it to the rafters. Lately, we’ve seen so much of Bachchan trying to be an Actor (paging “Black” and “Paa”) that it’s easy to forget how excellent his comic timing is. (For my money’s worth, Bachchan never was an actor; he’s just been a mere superstar all along.) “Piku” reminds me of the Amitabh Bachchan in Chupke Chupke or Namak Halal where he could have you in fits with a well-timed look or a juicy turn of phrase.***
You make a lot of contradictory statements here. If he has been just a mere superstar all along, then I am afraid I do not follow the odes to his comic timing in Chupke Chupke or Namal Halal.
That aside, it is a glorious butchering of history and assessment if one were to say that Amitabh has been a super-star all along. I can understand if one says – and to an extent rightly so – that he harnessed his superstardom quality more than the purist superlative actor in him. But to dismiss his outstanding craftsmanship as almost non-existent in the face of super-stardom is entirely inaccurate.
The problem with most ‘critics’ of star-actors is that they always look for ‘acting’ in those kind of roles that are tangential to the exaggerated characteristics of our films. So it would be easy to dismiss and difficult to appreciate what goes on in roles like that of Coolie’s or Sharaabi’s or Aakhree Raasta. And it would obviously be easier – not taking away anything at all from these classic performances – to appreciate Naseer in Paar or Sparsh. But when an actor is so rich that he can convey the nava-rasas even in superficial characters like the above ones, why would one need to go digging for ‘realistic’ roles? Within our ‘masala’ mould itself, there are fine instances where the ONLY actor to have done it all is Amitabh – and convincingly so. So much so that even when suffering from the utmost complex, an actor like Naseer says that the ONLY actor that can pull of all the inherent idiosyncrasies our cinema has to offer is Amitabh, followed not-very-closely by Dilip Kumar. And to paraphrase him further, Amitabh can easily be mentioned of as the only actor in the world who can be better than his films!! Only in the role of a dwarf or that of a mentally-disabled person does not one find ‘talent.’
Even if one were strict as to where one ‘looks’ for talent, Amitabh has demonstrated his prowess in the ‘subtlety’ genre amply. One just needs to watch MILI and SAUDAGAR to get the range that this actor has under his command. If this doesn’t define ‘true’ artistry, I don’t know what else will.
Since I will not be able to wax eloquent about his performances better than these two gentlemen, I am providing you a link about what they have to say –
And here’s the link to SAUDAGAR. The simplicity with which he conveys a gamut of complex emotions be they rage, jealousy or inferiority – it’s got to be seen to be believed.
LikeLike
brangan
May 14, 2015
Apu: Umm, I think you are overreacting to my statement. Please read it again 🙂
What a lovely, sporting attitude at a time when any kind of dissent is considered a personal attack and a cue for a heated retort. Thank you for this.
LikeLiked by 2 people
olemisstarana
May 14, 2015
@Apu: Mea culpa – I cannot believe I had such a brain fart when it came to that scene! I think it’s a larger point I was making (the response to you was only the first paragraph, and erroneous at that…) that was why I was more heated than necessary. I guess I am protective of women like Piku.
LikeLike
MANK
May 14, 2015
well kudos to Apu
But Brangan, what will happen to your blog if everybody starts taking things sportingly.
Honestly, Dont you want 200+ comments for each post or not? 😀
LikeLiked by 3 people
chhotesaab
May 14, 2015
I loved ‘Piku’ – I loved it because of the way it was made and acted/performed, but also because it led to an awesome write-up by Badesaab, and also led to a great discussion with all the great comments and observations ( really good ones by Pankaj).
Since the previews of Piku were shown and Amitabh’s bowel movement problem highlighted, I knew Baradwaj’s creative juices (to quote JAFB) would start flowing ! 🙂 Seeing the movie just confirmed it and was not disappointed by the write-up.
I liked all the performances – Amitabh, Deepika, Moushumi Chatterjee, Raghubir Yadav and other supporting cast but I agree with the opinion that Irrfan Khan was the most natural – didn’t seem like he was acting at all.
Your explanation as to why no flashbacks were needed to show Piku’s love for her annoying father was so on point – while watching the movie, my wife and I were smiling through the movie at parts where we could identify the traits with our parents.
Yes, the bowel movement talk is not just a bengali family phenomenon, sad to say I’ve been subjected to it too.
Bade, I was really surprised by your calling out the troll but loved it. 🙂
I haven’t seen any of Shoojit Sircar’s earlier films but now I want to and will.
LikeLike
Rahul
May 14, 2015
I saw Bavarchi in this film – a mysterious stranger walks in a dysfunctional family and walks away after pointing them in the right direction – so that they can live and die together harmoniously.
Irfan khan manages the transitions between his emotions so effortlessly that the skill of his acting morphs into the quality of his character, whose equanimity feels surreal and baffling at at times – and at the risk of appropriating a metaphor that promises more than it delivers, Irfan seems like Krishna the cabbie\charioteer making peace between Deepika’s Arjun and Amitabh’s Bhishma.
LikeLike
Apu
May 15, 2015
Baradwaj, MANK: Thanks! I believe almost everyone who comment here are passionate about movies, hence the heated discussions.
Olemisstarana: I could see that “protective” spirit and the passion for sure!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anu Warrier
May 15, 2015
Also, I still do not get the relationship with Syed. It might be a ‘old shoe’ relationship if they were also not attracted to each other sexually. If a relationship has caring/concern + understanding + respect (they are professional partners) +sexual attraction, to me that equates to a potential life partner.
It can equate to a potential life partner, but it need not, no? grin I’m not arguing the point either; to me, film viewing is very subjective and what you take away from the film is as valid as my perception of it. There is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ way of watching a film, is there?
I enjoyed the film, and I accepted that she had a friend who was also there for occasional sex, but that she didn’t necessarily see him as husband ‘material’. Happens. (It used to happen more often with men; that women can have a need for a similar relationship without wanting or needing marriage with the guy is still a dicey thing to vocalise – and for a mainstream Hindi film heroine to say it with such matter-of-factness is, I think, no mean feat.)
My niece is in her early twenties. 🙂 The gap between me and her is less than that of a generation. I have a brevet aunt to whom I could conceivably say anything, and I mean anything. It’s not that uncommon.
Thanks for the discussion. It’s nice to be able to discuss and debate these points without it having to be an ‘argument’ where one has to win, and therefore, the other, lose. 🙂
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
May 15, 2015
And this one: As for : ” High time that audiences accepted that women have needs too”
But really, this movie was not trying to make a statement, no? It was just being supposedly realistic.
Yes, and that is why that scene worked for me. Because it was so matter-of-fact, and so part of a normal conversation, where the director and script weren’t trying to hit me over the head with, ‘Oh, look, she is so ‘modern’ and ‘so hep’ that she can talk about sex!’ It is there, it is natural, it is important enough to be a ‘need’ but it is not something that Piku worries about. To her, it is part of her life – comforting, like scratching an itch; it acquires an importance only when that itch needs to be scratched.
So blessedly natural, in fact, that I loved the way that it was not this big revealing confession, just part of an everyday conversation about life, her father, and marriage.
LikeLiked by 2 people
rajandr
May 15, 2015
@olemisstarana
Point 1 This scene has already been clarified.
Point 2 On whether they were in equal footing I agree this is a grey area and too ambiguous to come to a conclusion. On large scale of the movie its trivial and can be set aside.
Point 3 on SC guidelines I agree I may have stretched it too far.
Point 4. On why I am focused on the woman’s sexual life.
As I pointed out in my original comment I said this aspect of a religious Piku’s sexual relationship with Syed Afroz ( nice name isn’t it) outside the institution of marriage wasn’t talked about much in the review by brangan. I thought this was the only original “modernity” this whole script offers and that was being watered down in the review and such inconsequential things like oiling hair,dusting house were discussed and “hailed”. I have to give it to brangan as he correctly points out that after Karan Joharisation of Hindi cinema the NRIs and wannabe NRIs for whom Hindi movies are made these days don’t want to see their reflections/aspirations on screen doing such menial labour and this movie tried to do some course correction by showing Piku helping her domestic help and not indulging in spa/saloon and only indulges in an ice cream when she needs to take an off.
That aside what’s so modern about Piku which is setting her apart. She’s managing domestic chores with a career. I know woman doing this for past 25 years. She’s making sacrifices. This too woman having been doing from time immemorial. If you read into the history of how and why woman’s rights where curtailed and how woman ended up being unequal you can trace it to the fact that men wanted to control the sexual rights of a woman and deny every opportunity where she might become independent thus asserting her right. A sexually liberated woman with a freedom to choose with whom she procreates and when she wants to is every man’s nightmare. Wasn’t it to ensure that only his gene is transmitted to maintain the so called purity and sustain the systems of caste and class women were not given a choice to choose the partners of their choice.
From this context if you look at how here Piku was shown to exercise this right of hers it was relieving to see someone show this on screen when at times marital rape is not even given legal status in a country where marriage is considered “sacred” and still abortion laws outside India by religious fundamentals are hounding women.
But then again modernity in this movie was restricted within the permissible and accepted limits not totally challenging the status quo or upsetting it. Irfan had to be shown as the owner of the travel agency so the class status matches that of Piku to have her seated besides him in the car and there could be some conversation between them in the movie at all. Imagine or why couldn’t have Irfan’s character be that of a driver and he giving a piece of his mind for all tantrums Amitabh is throwing. Wouldn’t it have been bold enough. But it would have upset the multiplex audience. It will make them ask what “auqat” does he have to speak like this to Amitabh. So the class equation is not disturbed. And Syed Afroz is also finally shown to be suffering from constipation and Piku simply walks off and his chances of picking any serious relationship is also shown to have lost and as an audience I too lost the hope of at last seeing a truly modern film.
@Apu My name is rajandr not rajendr. Just like its Bhaskor and not Bhaskar.
LikeLike
brangan
May 15, 2015
rajandr: My opinion about Piku’s sex life is expressed in the first para, where I talk about the friend who brings along “benefits” even as I talk about the utterly menial things she does. In other words, here, sex is like brushing teeth, etc. Utterly unremarkable. Quotidian. The film doesn’t put this aspect in quotation marks and I followed its lead by burying it amidst all the other things we see Piku doing.
And no, pointing something out isn’t “hailing” it.
I’m only saying “we see Piku dusting the ceiling.” There’s no emotion there, just dry observation. I’m not saying, “Piku is dusting the ceiling. Give this movie an Oscar already.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utkal
May 15, 2015
Rajandr: “Irfan had to be shown as the owner of the travel agency so the class status matches that of Piku to have her seated besides him in the car and there could be some conversation between them in the movie at all. Imagine or why couldn’t have Irrfan’s character be that of a driver and he giving a piece of his mind for all tantrums “
Yes, Irfan had to be the owner for Piku to be seat beside him. Irfran had to be the owner to speak to Amitabh the way he did. These things are not .likely to happen with a driver. Art’s first loyalty is to truth and not to political correctness or Utopian ideals. THe films is not set as a platform to give any message or paint an ideal society where a driver can speak roughly to an elderly renter of the vehicle. The film clearly is fashioned as a droll story about everyday characters not purported as any kind of role models. Artistic integrity demands that the director let the characters be what they are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
May 15, 2015
How about Piku 2? How she pulls on afterwards?
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
May 15, 2015
Also wanted to add that the film doesn’t make a big deal about her marital status either. She seems happy where she is. In the sense, she’s made her peace with the fact that she may be spending her life alone — and that that’s not necessarily a sad thing. She has work. She has sex. Maybe that’s enough for her.
It’s quite remarkable to see this aspect left dangling without a “romantic closure” with Irrfan. Who knows? Irrfan may become a boyfriend. A husband. Or maybe another friend with benefits.
I thought this was quite wonderful. And again, this wasn’t in quotation marks. Piku doesn’t say any of this. We are left to guess. That’s the best kind of writing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
D'Stand
May 15, 2015
BR,
I liked that they came up with that ending but also, I have always believed that an open ending is just another cinematic trick. It reminds me of the Christopher Nolan’s Inception. People who came out of the screen were so blown over by its open ending that everybody left theatre thinking they have seen something profound. They forgot they had just spent two and half hours watching nothing more than a cinematic version of a video game.
LikeLike
brangan
May 15, 2015
D’Stand: I saw this as a chapter in Piku’s life.. till the demise of her father. It didn’t bother me that there wasn’t any “closure” on the other aspects of her life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
olemisstarana
May 16, 2015
I wouldn’t even speak of Piku in the same breath as the KJo offerings (nothing against the latter, these movies could be from different planets. Also I am not particularly protective of any of the protagonists in those movies). I also don’t see this movie as cannily and pointedly making Piku do (1) oil her hair perfect for her to look domestic or (2) dust cobwebs she doesn’t mind doing “menial” tasks or (3) brushing her teeth *take some of that glamor off, make her relatable etc. etc. She just is. She doesn’t make a big deal about any of that or the fact that she is sexually active either.
I don’t disagree with much of your mental musings there, but nothing in your previous response addresses my issues with your original statements.
(I am also not entirely certain how we – you – entered into the realm of genome purity, so I’ll just let that be.)
(I am also not at all sure about the whole “auqat” business.)
(Also all the issues you seem to have with status and social strata are sort of entering the territory of re-writing the entire story – not particularly germane, unfortunately.)
Why should she be Caeser’s wife? Why is it an issue that she chooses to have recreational and not procreative sexual intercourse with someone she works with? PLUS, addressing the one issue you bring up at the end – how on earth does not ending up with Syed Afroz make this a not modern movie? Why does she have to “pick up a serious relationship” with anyone?
FYI, it’s Piku – not Pinku.
LikeLike
sanjana
May 16, 2015
There are two ways of getting a message across. One is the obvious and the other is more powerful. If the lead smokes, drinks alcohol, treats sex casually, those who watch will think these things are cool personal choices. My Choice.
LikeLike
Madan
May 17, 2015
Lovely film. This time, Sircar got the pacing right. Vicky Donor was kind of on steroids in the first half and then waded through the second. Piku is just laidback, leisurely throughout and takes it own sweet time to make its point. I am NOT saying Sircar is the next Hrishikesh Mukherjee but the film did remind me of Hrishi-da’s films. Because, to endorse the point BR made w.r.t the titular protagonist, the film has wholesome characters who bring forth a slice of real life. I felt this time the way he tapped into Bong stereotypes was more natural and restrained actually, compared to VD where it was kind of cartoonish, Have to also agree with mostly everyone that Irfan stood out in a solid cast. He just breezed through the role without looking like he was trying hard to act. I thought Deepika Padukone would be too pretty to carry off a moody, temperamental Bong but she did so really well.
@An Jo: “So it would be easy to dismiss and difficult to appreciate what goes on in roles like that of Coolie’s or Sharaabi’s or Aakhree Raasta. And it would obviously be easier – not taking away anything at all from these classic performances – to appreciate Naseer in Paar or Sparsh.” Also Naseer gets so frustrated at having to do mainstream roles that he wears his contempt on his sleeve and mars the film for the audience. Krissh and Dirty Picture come to mind and the latter wasn’t even such an incorrigibly bad commercial film. Whereas AB is at ease in both worlds. I would only say against AB that he could do with better voice modulation. His tone is so distinct and fixed (even here he’s Amitabh very effectively acting out an old Bong hypochondriac) that he is at times unable to transcend his towering personality and become the character. Not many Bolly actors can (no, I don’t think Naseer does that either) for that matter, but certainly Hollywood actors with great baritone voices like Antony Hopkins seem to have no trouble inhabiting BOTH Hannibal Lecter and Alfred Hitchcock. Need say nothing of Gary Oldman, the ultimate chameleon. By those exalted standards, yes, AB is still more of a star than an actor.
LikeLike
Madan
May 17, 2015
Imagine or why couldn’t have Irfan’s character be that of a driver and he giving a piece of his mind for all tantrums Amitabh is throwing. – That may have been bold but would it really be modern? We derive our notions of modernity from the West and the West loves privacy. A chauffuer in the West would not have offered unsolicited advice and so bluntly at that as Rana Chaudhry is able to. That is quintessentially Indian.
LikeLike
Arun Pandari
May 19, 2015
I too felt the similarity the movie has with ‘As good as it gets’. I always wanted to see an Indian actor perform like Nicholson in that movie and Amitabh comes close in this movie. And I remembered my grandfather when I saw Amitabh. Its true when you said that this movie makes us remember our own life.
LikeLiked by 3 people
An Jo
May 20, 2015
It’s 31 years of ‘Sharaabi’ .. goodness feels like just the other day we were on the World Tour of 1983, the very first of its kind for the Industry and having performed in almost 10 cities in US and London, flying to Trinidad & Tobago from NYC, when Prakash Mehra also travelling with me, suggests we should do a film based on a father son relationship where the son is an alcoholic !! So the seed of the film was sewn over the Atlantic Ocean, about half way in the air at 35,000 feet, past the Florida ‘pan handle’ portion of the US and some distance from Cuba, Bermuda, Port Louis .. something somewhere above …
A major observation was made by me after the first day of the shoot. I told Prakash Ji, since my character is intoxicated for most of the film, and since a drunk takes a lot more time to say his dialogues, if the dialogues were going to be long and lengthy, then he should be prepared for a 5 hour film, for, it would take time for me to say those lines since they were going to be measured and in a state of intoxication. Point noted. And the scenes were shortened and made amenable for the situation.
It was also during the making of ‘Sharaabi’ that a Divali bomb blew up my left hand. The dates had been allocated and the shoot could not be cancelled, so I went ahead in order not to disturb or cause delay. The hand had been reduced to pulp. It looked like a raw cooked tandoori chicken. Every portion of the hand had melted. But I continued to work. And the ploy that I used was to hide my left hand as much as possible. Most of the film was enacted with my left hand in my pocket !! Most of the audience thought that it was a style adopted by me for the film. Many impromptu suggestions used to come up in those days. They do even now, but I think then they were more last minute and unprepared ! Like the fight sequence in the bar when I take on the guys that had stolen my watch and chain etc. That was choreographed by me … Fun times !!!
Did not dub the death scene of Om Prakash ji .. it would never have been the same. The entire film was dubbed, but not that scene. I just refused to do it. The spontaneity would have been lost. Sound was not sync sound then. The large Mitchell camera was in operation, and I remember that Prakash ji had imported a ‘blimp’, a sound cover for the camera to reduce the sound effect and noise when it would run.
http://srbachchan.tumblr.com/
LikeLike
MANK
May 20, 2015
An Jo, you fooled me for a moment there. I thought you were an inner member of Prakash mehra’s creative team. 🙂
Thanx for that link, Hearing it from Mr. Bachchan’s own words was wonderful. Sharaabi is one of my Favorite Bachchan pics and performances.
LikeLike
apala
May 20, 2015
BR,
Good to see two versions of the review! Well, I will always go for the longer version! Love your writing – spoilers don’t bother me!
It was an enjoyable ride – glad to see mainstream Indian films with such subjects (loved your line on Vicky Donor!). It’s a shitty business, literally!
Your finishing line reminded me “Some dance to remember, some dance to forget” – don’t know why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An Jo
May 21, 2015
@MANK: No luck like that!!! Thought it to be an interesting anecdote and shared it here. And he rarely gives out such things.
Having said that, I don’t know whether you or Rangan or anyone here who is invested in Amitabh has seen this – but this is a wonderful look at Amitabh in 1989 before Nasreen Kabir started messing with our heads by meddling with the so-called inner and outer worlds of Shah Rukh Khan..
LikeLike
pankaj1905
May 23, 2015
Some thoughts by me here. http://dichotomy-of-irony.blogspot.com/2015/05/piku-motion-se-hi-emotion.html
LikeLike
Gargi Mehra
May 23, 2015
Wrote this for HuffPost India, centred on Shoojit Sircar’s films including Piku:
http://www.huffingtonpost.in/gargi-mehra-/how-my-life-is-like-a-sho_b_7310706.html
LikeLike
bong
May 24, 2015
Interest and somewhat mind boggling discussions here on Piku. For me it was much hyped up movie and I am in agreement with greatbong’s (greatbong.net) review/take over everyone else’s (including baddys). I found the movie boring and unidimensional. Maybe all the hype of the movie had generated great expectations? Had same/similar experience with Finding Fanny. Found one scene funny out of whole movie and the ‘romance’ is just not there between driver/owner irrfan or Piku. If she was sexually liberated person, at least there should be some crackling physical chemistry (inspite of her bad-ass constipated/out of mood outburst for whole world,) that could have come to fore taking the movie to another level? Piku part2 should be much more interesting. Couldn’t see great histronics in acting by deepu or bachchan or even irrfan. I just didn’t see the scene where piku is sleeping with syed in same house? I saw the phone ring and his caller id but didn’t see him in the room in the morning? Did I miss something? If Irrfan is trying to impress piku by getting engaged in a subject he otherwise rolls his eyes, then why wouldn’t Syed who already has same issue, do with Piku?
LikeLike
wheatstalking
May 24, 2015
Wouldn’t it be interesting to see a movie the other way round. The daughter not ‘letting go’ and the dad having to take care of her. Now thats a load of baggage from which anyone would take ten steps backward. What would be the ending? Any why this obsession with ‘endings’? Life goes on. Only death comes as the end… and even that isn’t an end in itself. I wish I could direct a movie like the one I just described. The ‘ending’ would show her happily ‘letting go’… and falling freely into the hands of Gravity… and standing up again. Kind of preachy… but I’m sure it’ll resonate with a lot of peoples’ realities out there.
LikeLike
aparna
May 25, 2015
I’m surprised that many thought the ending was ambiguous. To me it was crystal clear that Piku gets together with Rana because :
1) They have just shifted into a new house (earlier it was C 124 now it is B 201) and
2) she is having her newly installed name plate corrected from “Bhasker” to “Bhaskor”.
3)The maid tells her in the earlier scene when she quits that she will come back to work for Piku when she sets up house with her husband. And here in the last scene, the maid says she is coming back to work
4) And after she says so, she gives a sideways meaningful look at Rana.
Elementary 8)
I totally missed though that lovely badminton symbolism and her friend with benefits’ entry from the bedroom after her dad gets sick.
Thanks to the comments section here for calling both of that to my attention.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Priya
May 25, 2015
Great film. Fantastic review. Engaging comments. Aargh..I’ve been here for almost an hour.
But yes, this is one of the most delightful films I’ve watched recently. The best part is that inspite of being woman-centric, it is neither like Queen nor like English-Vinglish (both of which I loved). Piku is a woman who doesn’t have to prove anything. Wow! I am kind of avoiding watching 36-vayadhiniley precisely for that reason (I still haven’t made up my mind though).
Some thoughts:
1. Aren’t Syed and Piku partners in the firm? They seem to have an equal relationship. I didn’t think he was her boss and that she is ‘sleeping with her boss’, like someone suggested here. No way.
2. Like someone else wondered here, doesn’t Piku have a ‘bhalo-naam’?
Yes, Brangan saab, I have also begun reading your revs only after watching the film and perhaps writing about it myself! And yes, for everything else, your blog is my go-to place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Priya
May 25, 2015
Finding Fanny was also an outspoken film about a dysfunctional family’s journey but somehow made me uncomfortable. Perhaps because I had watched the dubbed Hindi version with my entire clan around me (ages ranging 7 – 75). 😛
LikeLike
VenkateswaranGanesan (@_Drunkenmunk)
May 25, 2015
Watched only yesterday. Lovely film and fine writing.
Was it just me or was Champakunj, the house, a mirror to Bhaskor himself? Old, creaky, with water troubles of it own 😉 which needs fixing by Rana, who also ends up fixing the old man’s constipation. And just as Piku is unwilling to give up on Bhaskor, Bhaskor and Piku don’t want Champakunj sold. Even the house has a character by the end of the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Priya
May 25, 2015
Coming to think of it, yes, maybe.
LikeLike
aparna
May 25, 2015
Their ancestral house was so beautiful.
I also loved that scene where they serve dinner in Piku’s house. What mouth watering dishes were doled on to their plates. Made me quite covet that servant of their’s :).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Priya
May 25, 2015
Aparna, my observations on the food.
“Apart from music, the other technical aspect that I loved was the photography (Kamaljit Negi). I particularly loved the dining-table scenes. I can’t remember any Indian film that has captured food so beautifully ever (I haven’t watched Lunch Box and I hang my head in shame). Being a fan of Bengali food, the close-up shots of Bengali Yellow Pulao, Begun Bhaja were enough to floor me, so did the shot of the Jalebis.”
http://priyaworld.blogspot.in/2015/05/piku-fun-and-emotional-journey.html
LikeLiked by 2 people
aparna
May 25, 2015
Oh Begun Bhaja, was that the yummy looking Brinjal dish? Thanks for that 🙂
You should watch Lunch box, that was another movie that left me with a food craving 🙂
Now Ive lived both in New Delhi and Calcutta while in school and what a difference between the two cities. One so clean but heartless and soul-less, the other dirty, filthy and poverty stricken (it still is, I went there recently) but despite that, so much beauty, character and soul in it. As was mentioned in one of the comments, how poetic were the scenes in Calcutta in Piku, the tram tracks, the rickshaws and the Howrah bridge. And is it just me, but does just having a bit of West Bengal (or Bengalis) in a movie add it class.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Priya
May 26, 2015
In Piku, they even have a tiny conversation about Dilli waalas, when the Kolatta aunt is surprised that Rana offers to drive them down. Oh, loved Irrfan in that scene (any many others).
Hee…hee..We might have bricks flying towards us for this but yes, I think I have to agree with you on the Bengalis-adding-class thought. Perhaps this feeling has its roots back in the Doordarshan days or some cultural stereotyping in our heads..don’t know, but I like it. 😛
LikeLiked by 2 people
tejas
May 26, 2015
The up/downvote buttons are annoying and very distracting.
LikeLike
Sev
June 22, 2015
I liked the movie though felt cheated towards the end when PIku’s dad dies. It felt like a cop out esp after all that she was doing to keep him hale and hearty. It felt like a convenient way for Piku to get her life back even though knowing Piku, she didn’t consider her dad a deterrent to her dreams except occasionally. And I felt that more than Rana, there was a greater romantic angle with Jishnu Sengupta’s character. Wouldn’t you agree? Not that I mind that, quite the converse. It was nice to have characters without the need for a romance.
LikeLike
K.
June 26, 2015
Why do you say “The character is introduced in a scene about a hit and run. Art imitating life or life imitating art? Discuss. Twenty points.” ?
As far as I remember, Irrfan wasn’t involved in a hit and run case, was he? Or were you referring to that other Khan?
LikeLike