Spoilers ahead…
Sometimes I wonder if we react badly to films because of the way they are promoted, the way we are programmed to think they’re going to be. Take Nikhil Advani’s Katti Batti. The trailer promised us a teddy bear; the film is a porcupine. We thought this was another rom-com – perhaps with a few more frayed edges than usual. The girl, Payal, after all, is played by Kangana Ranaut. But Katti Batti is three movies rolled into one. One part of it is that cutesy rom-com. The film opens with a pretend-wedding in which boy (Maddy, played by Imran Khan) and girl do their pheras after tossing a match into a trash can filled with papers – later, he squeezes out some ketchup and smears it on the parting in her hair. The awwws can be heard all the way to the moon. Another part of the film is an inward-gazing (500) Days of Summer-style anti-romance, with a mopey Maddy looking back on his relationship after being dumped. There’s also a melodramatic soap opera in here, with kkkkismet waiting in the wings with the world’s largest spanner.
Katti Batti is essentially Tanu Weds Manu plucked from Anycity, North India, and transplanted into Zoya Akhtar’s apartment complex – and as with that film (and its sequel), the biggest challenge is to accept that these opposites would attract. Maddy meets Payal in college and a day later, he wants to marry her. I kept thinking: Why? This is the kind of film where the characters are defined more by what they wear than how they are written. Maddy wears a pair of spectacles, which is basically movie-ese for “I prefer books,” or “I’m not comfortable with crowds,” or “I wouldn’t be played by Kangana Ranaut.” As for Payal, the costume designer was basically given the brief: “Loco Chanel.” When Maddy talks of marrying her, she’s wearing denim shorts, a fedora, and her red shirt is pulled down over a shoulder to expose a bra strap. Their romance is like one of those ‘soft news’ stories about a hamster and a grizzly found cuddling in a zoo.
A film faced with such a couple should spend time making us believe that they could be a couple. We need to see how he smoothes her edges, how she juices him up. We need more scenes of them in love. We get a nicely done song sequence styled like a live-action comic strip made with stop-motion animation – but while it’s fun to watch, it’s less an answer than a statement. It just tells us they are in love, instead of telling us why. Or maybe the problem is Imran Khan, whose gamut of emotions can be counted on one finger. We spend a lot of time looking at him, and he just doesn’t have what it takes to hold a movie together. He’s a timid presence. At one point, Payal accuses Maddy of eating junk food and farting. I thought: Imran Khan can fart? He’s so pretty and airbrushed, he seems constitutionally incapable of something as robustly earthy as farting. A tiny burp concealed by a fist, followed by an “Excuse me?” Maybe. He works well in generic rom-coms (Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na) and low-key coming-of-age dramas (Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu) – but he’s not who you call to do drama, and certainly not melodrama. Towards the end, we are treated to Imran Khan’s version of a Shah Rukh moment – Maddy screws up his eyes and expresses great distress. It gets worse. It’s a close-up.
The other misfit is the director. Nikhil Advani has very Indian sensibilities – if you thought last week’s Hero was bad, just imagine how much worse it would have been under another filmmaker. He looks lost in this story about a live-in relationship gone wrong. He has Maddy inform us, some three seconds into the movie, that this is a live-in relationship. (Does anyone in a live-in relationship actually use the words “live-in relationship?”) When a girlfriend talks about Payal, she doesn’t say, “she’s moved on” – she says “Woh aage badh chuki hai.” In the ‘70s, this line would have referred to someone who’d found success in a business enterprise. How things change. The worst example of over-explaining is with regard to a pet tortoise. It’s named Milkha. That’s it. We smile. The joke is over. But a character then says: Flying Sikh. He adds: That’s really funny. He’s not just hammering the joke home. He’s driving it six feet under.
This character is part of a band that calls itself FOSLA – for Frustrated One-sided Lovers’ Association. That’s clever, but neither this character nor the band amount to anything. They’re just there so we don’t have to keep looking at Maddy all the time. Other such characters include a pneumatically endowed knockout of a colleague who sets out to prove her feelings for Maddy by placing his hand on her chest (doesn’t anyone normal ever fall for him?), and a ‘South Indian’ boss named Ramalingam who keeps screeching and bouncing around like he just sat on a frying pan. I would be offended if this were a better movie. Advani proves he just cannot stage physical comedy. There’s a bit about Maddy urinating in a water closet that costs five lakhs. At least it sounds funny. Even worse are the efforts by Maddy’s friends to clean him up after a night of booze before his parents arrive. Rarely has so much frantic activity resulted in a stretch so dull.
Late into the second half, the story turns into a weepie – there’s a twist that made me gasp, then laugh. But small mercies, Advani finally finds his groove. There’s an airport scene featuring a twenty-rupee note that has a phone number scrawled on it – I blubbered a bit. And this twist results in the film’s only interesting bit of writing. Early on, we see Payal sobering up in Maddy’s house when his father offers her the bangle Maddy made for his mother. We think back to older melodramas and their shagun ke kangan. We think things are getting way too serious for Payal, who just wanted a “time-pass” relationship. But now, we see why she reacted the way she did. Kangana plays this scene well. Whatever little pleasure there is in Katti Batti comes from watching her. She has great instincts – she’s always a second or two off with whatever she’s doing, she catches you unawares. She affects the most unusual inflections in her line readings. And she’s completely comfortable with her body. It all adds up to a singular screen presence. The way she lights up after coming home and setting eyes on Milkha – you could rub your hands over that look on a cold night. I first kept thinking she deserved better. But without the likes of her, how would we ever make it through these bad movies?
KEY:
- Katti Batti = the kiddie-world equivalent of fighting and making up
- pheras = see here
- (500) Days of Summer = see here
- (Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na = see here
- Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu = see here
- Hero = see here
- shagun ke kangan = wedding bangle
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Akhilan
September 19, 2015
Now I know why Aamir Khan weeped after watching this movie… 😀
LikeLike
Iswarya
September 19, 2015
That “Maddy/Imran Khan” reference was confusing. Especially with TWM mentioned right after it, I read half the review thinking the movie had both Madhavan and Imran Khan in it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
September 19, 2015
Iswarya: You’re right. Didn’t think of that ‘Maddy’ as I wrote 🙂
Though I thought you were going to pick on the “gamut of emotions” line and say ‘gamut’ is collective, and therefore it can be expressed on one finger 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Iswarya
September 19, 2015
Er.. Embarrassing to admit, but knowing halfway through the review that the movie was not a Madhavan-starrer sort of left me glazed-eyed through the rest of the review feeling all cheated! Hmmm.. Such is nostalgia. 🙂
LikeLike
Iswarya
September 19, 2015
But I did squint and wring my hands helplessly at the “kkkkismet” part before the glazing over happened! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sami
September 19, 2015
FOSLA was first used in a song called CHASKA PAR TAALA from the movie Dil Dosti Etc. years ago. there should have been some credit given to it.
LikeLike
Rahul
September 19, 2015
Sami, FOSLA has been around much longer than that. It was likely invented by students of Mechanical Engineering in some north indian college.
LikeLike
venkatesh
September 19, 2015
Gaah – . i have given up on Imran Khan. What a shame, he was just perfect in “Delhi Belly”.
I instead started thinking of Ayusshman Khurana of “Vicky Donor” and “Dum Laga ke Haisha” in this. That would have been brilliant.
LikeLike
abhilashache
September 19, 2015
i did not understand the bit about anand rai-zoya akhtar but everything else about the review is just spot on.
and baradwaj sir, why didnt you write a screenplay after kadhal 2 kalyanam. i remember you mentioning in a piece that you would be a competent screenwriter at best, but sir seriously i think you will be able to write a kickass screenplay. just think about it.
LikeLike
diwakartvb
September 20, 2015
“The way she lights up after coming home and setting eyes on Milkha – you could rub your hands over that look on a cold night.”
LikeLike
S.P
September 20, 2015
The trailer promised us a teddy bear; the film is a porcupine.
I booked tickets for this movie and after reading your review decided not to go 🙂 saved 12 bucks !
LikeLike
MANK
September 20, 2015
Kangana Ranaut is the best actress on the scene.But I am afraid shes going the vidya Balan way- choosing all the wrong projects and talking way over her head
LikeLike
sanjana
September 21, 2015
I agree with MANK.
It is not about selection. It is about getting good roles where she can be the hero and heroine.
As for Imran, I have given up. He should take multi starrers instead of solo ones.
LikeLike
Rahini David
September 21, 2015
Enakku intha Review anniyaayathukku pudichurukku.
BTW, “Woh aage badh chuki hai” na enna?
LikeLike
Deepak
September 21, 2015
What a brilliant review – many people have said it before, but it is the terrible movies that gives you the most to talk about and seem to trigger your creative juices the most, so thank god for terrible movies! 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
September 21, 2015
Rahini David: It means “she’s moved on”, as I say in the earlier part of the sentence. In such cases, I feel there’s no need to repeat it in the KEY section.
LikeLike
Apu
September 24, 2015
Actually “Woh aage badh chuki hai” in Hindi context might also mean that she has proceeded to… ahem.. next level. But I am sure that was not what it was intended to mean here.
LikeLike
asmamasood
November 21, 2015
I know it’s a bit late, but your feedback on this review? https://asmamasood.wordpress.com/2015/11/21/katti-batti-can-light-ever-batti-darkness/
LikeLike