Spoilers ahead…
When we say “fairy tale” in the context of a certain kind of narrative, we usually refer to the deliberate unrealness, the escapist-wish-fulfilment-happiness of it all – but Vikas Bahl seems to take the term literally. His earlier film, the pleasant enough though over-praised Queen, was one. I wrote in my review that it is “a sun-dappled fairy tale, with a line of fairy godmothers cherishing and protecting [the protagonist]…” Now, we have Shaandaar, where the Brothers Grimm seem to have sat in on the screenwriting discussions. There’s a castle, a frog, a coach carrying a cute pumpkin of a girl, a Cupid-like boy with a bow and arrow. The story centres on an orphan (Alia, played by Alia Bhatt) who, in the tradition of fairytale heroines, is in constant communion with nature – she speaks to that frog, the insects on her sweaters keep springing to life. Alia has a stepmother, naturally, who, if not wicked, is utterly indifferent to her existence. But there is a wicked witch (Sushma Seth), who’s killed when her “curse” rebounds.
The last Hindi film to so explicitly evoke children’s literature was Sachin Kundalkar’s Aiyyaa – Rani Mukerji’s heroine was Alice, the film was her wonderland. Alia, on the other hand, is Sleeping Beauty – rather, given her insomnia, she’s an un-sleeping beauty. (There’s a magical scene in which a deep sleep falls over the entire kingdom, even the animals.) And of course, there’s a prince. Alia’s loving father (Pankaj Kapur, in a beautifully poised performance) tells her that one day she’ll find the prince of her dreams – or at least, a prince who will make her dream, a “sulaane wala rajkumar.” He arrives in the form of Jagjinder Joginder (Shahid Kapoor, cruising through a part that asks nothing of him). We expect him to charge in on his horse and whisk Alia away, but there’s a hitch. He cannot ride. He’s an un-prince.
Shaandaar also nods in the direction of Bollywood’s fairy tales, the cinema of Karan Johar. Because Alia cannot sleep, her father gives her sheets of paper with sketches for dreams – these are but the oneiric equivalent of the letters the dead mother wrote to her daughter in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. From Kabhi Khushi Kabie Gham, we have the overweight “ugly duckling” blossoming into a swan (not as literally, though; in that film, the boy transformed into… Hrithik Roshan) – and when a couple of ditzy girls see the castle for the first time, they squeal, “OMG! This is like K3G!” It’s a stretch, but you could also make a case that Alia’s father is in an unhappy marriage like the ones in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna. And how can we miss the refreshingly casual gay character, who’s allowed to be both a limp-wristed figure of fun (holding a very phallic gun, no less) and someone whose sexuality does not come in the way of his family’s loving him. Indeed. Shouldn’t we be able to laugh at people we also love unconditionally?
But all these ideas, all these layers, don’t come together satisfactorily. The film is rhythmless and somewhat dull, and you keep wondering why it all sounds like so much fun and yet there’s so little to enjoy. Why doesn’t the Sanjay Kapoor character, who could be called The Man with the Golden Gun, make us laugh more? Why is the Mehendi With Karan segment – such a clever concept, in a wedding-themed movie –written so blandly? Why are scenes – one about a drug-induced hallucination, another where the leads cut loose to Eena Meena Deeka – allowed to go on like this, long past the point where they’ve made their point? And what is it with that scene where Alia sits down for breakfast and discovers lingerie on her plate? Don’t worry. This isn’t a spoiler. This was in the trailer, like all the other moments that make us sit up. If they handed out awards for how to kill the movie experience by giving away the highlights, Shaandaar would sweep them all, no contest.
And why isn’t there any romance? At least for this question, I think, there is an answer. The intent was probably to stick as closely as possible to an innocent fairytale template, without a whiff of sex – hence the scene where Alia and Jagjinder, when alone, opt to pillow-fight. But another reason is that Bahl keeps wanting to transcend the traditional registers of Hindi cinema. And this works sometimes – when Alia’s stepsister Esha (Sanah Kapoor, making a confident, charming debut) tells her father that Alia has always been his favourite, or when Alia is dismissed as an “anaath” by her grandmother. Normally, these scenes would be a cue for stung expressions and smudged mascara, but this matter-of-fact mode works too. After all, these aren’t fresh insights to these girls. These are things they’ve lived with all their lives, the tears long expended.
Alia Bhatt handles this scene wonderfully. There’s a brief flash of hurt, a wince, and then it passes. She seems to have no false notes in her repertoire, and she keeps coming up with the most unexpected reactions and line readings. Just look at how she handles the scene where she finds out who her father is and calls him “real papa.” Her only disadvantage may be that face, that babyface that makes you want to cover your eyes and yell “child porn” when you see her in a bikini. I wonder what kind of roles she’ll fit in after she’s too old for these roles – but that time, thankfully, is far away. You wish the film’s Alia had been as convincing. Shaandaar keeps giving its characters these bitty traits. Like insomnia. Like Jagjinder’s fear of the night. Like Alia’s Google-like memory for fun facts. But they’re just bits. They don’t add up to anything.
And at least some scenes needed to be less matter-of-fact. Bahl deserves credit for always trying to fight his way out of the box, but rendering emotional stretches in animation – for instance – simply says “I’m so cool,” without helping the movie. Alia’s father’s flashbacks would have worked much better as live action. There’s a difference between drama and melodrama. The latter is a pitch, but the former gives audiences something to invest in, someone to care about. That thing they say about the baby and the bathwater keeps coming to mind. Oddly, Bahl stages his scenes “naturally,” with pauses and silences, without cutifying exaggerations, but he goes all blingy in his songs. It’s like standing under a shower that can’t decide whether to go hot or cold.
And yet, and yet. You don’t want to write off Shaandaar. At least one of those songs is a beauty. It’s a battle-of-the-sexes qawwali (music by Amit Trivedi), and I was as gobsmacked to see it as I was when Agent Vinod brought back the mujra. Amitabh Bhattacharya’s rhymes are dizzyingly delightful – nakli noton ka ek bundle/senti wali mental; God/fraud; sandal/accidental; hirni chaal/ 2 BHK hall; demand/James Bond; falooda/behuda. At one point, the banter acquires a mean sheen, when Esha’s weight is mocked, but her father and Jagjinder swoop in from the sidelines and save her. It’s an important scene for a couple of reasons. One, here’s a stretch of plot that could have been done straight, with dialogue, but is instead done through song, the way we hardly see anymore. (Most songs, today, are just shiny distractions.) But more importantly, we see the dynamics in this family, how they stand up for each other. I can hear a faint feminist cry that Esha isn’t being allowed to retaliate by herself, that she needs these men, but note the glorious scene at the end where she walks away – all by herself – from a marriage that has doom written all over it. She slips out of her bridal finery – she strips down, actually, and proudly presents a sight we never ever see, the non-mocking image of a plus-size woman in body-hugging innerwear, fashioning her curves into a giant middle finger for those who cannot see beyond them. The cutest touch is that her “emancipation,” if you will, is all too human. “I’m not that fat,” she says defensively. Whether she is or isn’t is not the point, which is more about the little lies we tell ourselves to make us feel more… shaandaar.
KEY:
- shaandaar = fa-a-abulous
- Queen = see here
- Aiyyaa = see here
- “sulaane wala rajkumar” = a prince who will put you to sleep (not that way, though)
- Kuch Kuch Hota Hai = see here
- Kabhi Khushi Kabie Gham = see here
- Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna = see here
- Eena Meena Deeka = see here
- anaath = orphan
- qawwali = see here; also here
- Agent Vinod = see here
- mujra= see here; also here
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Black Dynamite
October 23, 2015
I was hoping Shahid would start choosing better movies, after Haider, but after I saw the trailer, I was pretty disappointed. At least there seems to be some good stuff according to your review.
LikeLike
Abhirup
October 23, 2015
I really wish they stop showing gay people as sporting limp wrists, and as following some profession other than modelling/fashion designing. There’s nothing “refreshing” about that part of the movie (which I found rather stupid overall), sorry. Also, I don’t think we need to laugh at somebody to express our love towards that person. It’s one thing if a character has a funny trait that’s mined for comedy, but if something innate to a character that he is born with and can neither change nor needs to (such as his sexual orientation) itself becomes the source of laughter, I think I am not going to laugh.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anu Warrier
October 23, 2015
So. Tell me, BR, should I watch Shaandaar or not? 🙂
LikeLike
JPhil
October 23, 2015
Aah, Madam Warrier, if only guru BR could answer such existentialist questions …… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apu
October 23, 2015
“these are but the oneiric equivalent of the letters”
Oneiric – wow, I love it, I learnt something new today.
Loved your nuanced – this could be better, and the exceptions-to-cliche moments review. Makes me want to see “Shandaar”, if only for those scenes, and also to watch Pankaj Kapoor’s daughter.
LikeLike
Apu
October 23, 2015
Abhirup, I have not seen the scenes/movie so maybe my comment is no relevant. However, I don’t think BR said “we need to laugh at somebody to express our love towards that person”. What I took from that part was that just because something is not PC, it should not be taboo in a family, as long as there is acceptance of an underlying trait. For e.g., my mother is a thin petite person, and she has motherly “concern/issues” with our weight, mine and my sisters. She jokes about it, we get very angry, and then we laugh. That does not mean she disowns us for being… ummm… bulky. Nor do we point out that she is mean or anything – we are ok with it.
The bottomline is, she accepts us being what we are and points out the problems with that, and yes, you can do that.
LikeLike
shivkumarg
October 24, 2015
Why isn’t the Mehendi With Karan segment – such a clever concept, in a wedding-themed movie –written so blandly?
Typo ?
Great review!
LikeLike
Abhirup
October 24, 2015
Apu: The goings-on between you and your mother and sisters is not something I have any right to comment on, and if you are okay with it, it’s absolutely none of my business. Excuse me, though, if I am not okay with the idea that a gay person’s relatives have a right to laugh at him as long as they don’t resort to outright gay-bashing. Homophobia often manifests itself not in physical violence against LGBT people — though there’s plenty of that happening too–but in the snide remarks and taunts, and those aren’t fine even if it’s the parents or the siblings speaking. Call it the result of having faced homophobia all too often, and that too in what are supposed to be very polite and open-minded circles, but I really have very little patience for people who, in effing 2015, snigger at the thought of two people of the same sex being attracted to and falling in love with each other.
This is not to say gay people in the movies cannot be funny. By God, they can and should be. The fun, though, should emanate from behavioural traits rather than their sexual orientation. Surely they can do better than re-cycle the same limp-wristed abominations.
“The bottomline is, she accepts us being what we are and points out the problems with that, and yes, you can do that.”
Homosexuality isn’t a “problems”, though, is it? A parent being concerned over a child putting on too much weight is understandable, for obesity can lead to ailments. A parent concerned about a child being gay, though, is merely homophobic. The two are not comparable.
LikeLiked by 4 people
tonks
October 24, 2015
Is there even a single Indian main stream movie where people with a non-straight orientation are shown to be externally exactly like straight people, without feminine mannerisms ? Like the cowboys of Brokeback mountain for instance.
The example you quoted is not exactly the same. Weight is something you can change, Apu. Sexual orientation is not. Perhaps she wants you two to do something about it by her well intentioned teasing? If she was making fun of you for something that’s not totally in your control like being dark or short, would that have been as easily excused? But yes, admittedly there are families and close friends who do that too : poke fun of things you cannot change. When it comes along with genuine affection, acceptance and love people probably tolerate it. But it’s still a little unkind. Like laughing at a kid who stutters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
tonks
October 24, 2015
Oneiric was a new one for me too. My dictionary did not have the word so thought it was a typo till I googled it 🙂
LikeLike
tonks
October 24, 2015
Actually I should not have used stuttering as an analogy because that’s a medical defect that is amenable to some correction and homosexuality is not, it’s only a wiring of the brain that’s a little different from the majority. It’s more like teasing a person for being left handed. Except that we wouldn’t, would we?
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
October 24, 2015
Black Dynamite: I don’t think this is a bad choice of film, as such. It doesn’t come together well, but there are some nice things along the way and it certainly must have sounded fun and interesting (when narrated, or when read as a script). Ultimately, these films boil down to how they are directed. You need a certain sensibility to put across sustained zaniness on screen, and IMO this director did not have it (at least in this case).
I mean, Sanjay Kapoor as an exaggerated Sindhi type who never leaves his golden gun and who claims Queen Elizabeth is Sindhi. Sounds kinda nutty and fun, right? But it just withers and dies on screen. I was reminded of Shaad Ali’s Kill Dil — again, another film that sounds much better than it is. And again, not easily dismissible because there’s a lot of interesting conceptual-level stuff there. (I reviewed it here — and oddly, used the word “misfire” there too.)
Also, in such films, you need to be clear what you’re setting out to do. Are you skewering fairy tales? In that case, do that consistently. You can’t just have a few things here and there and allude to fairy-tale-skewering. Or are you sending up KJo films? Then do that. Or even do both. But do it consistently.
There are so many interesting bits and pieces here, but they don’t add up to a vision. So we have to settle for occasional bouts of fun — which is why “interesting” is the best word to use, rather than say “successful.”
Abhirup: My apologies if I hurt your feelings, but I do allow my friends and family to get away with teasing me about things, the kind of teasing that would offend me if it was done by strangers. That’s where I was coming from.
Anu Warrier: So. Tell me, BR, should I watch Shaandaar or not?
IMO, “interesting” is always a good thing. I think one is a true cinema lover only if they go to films that look/sound interesting rather than a guaranteed good time. I hope that clarified things 🙂
shivkumarg: Thanks, made the correction.
tonks: My Brother Nikhil comes to mind.
LikeLike
Aran
October 24, 2015
I watched this today and was sorely disappointed. I was hoping for so much more than what this turned out to be… and there’s just so much unrealized potential here.
Overall, yes, this is a Karan Johar movie without KJo actually directing it. What stops it from being a successful Karan Johar movie though is that this rom-com is heavy on the comedy and falls flat with the romance part. Why anyone thought doing this was a good thing beats me, for in every iteration of the KJo rom-com, the romance has worked better than the comedy. I mean, just think of the cringe-worthy moments in KKHH with the dadi or KHNH with the oldies’ love story or K3G’s “Poo” or KANK’s “Sexy Sam” and you know what I mean. The comedy tracks were just awful. If you’re using a template, spend some time to figure out why and how it works rather than just hashing together what doesn’t work from it!
Here’s what I mean about the Karan Johar school’s sense of comedy: Deleted comedy track with the community center for Kal Ho Na Ho – such awfulness:
And deleted comic scenes from KKHH:
BR, I can’t believe you liked the “real papa” scene. I thought it was way off. I mean, who is delighted with the fact that they’re najayaz? Delight for the fact that she’s Pankaj Kapoor’s real daughter, I get. But to say, ‘Main najayaz hoon’ multiple times in that gleeful tone was weird.
LikeLike
brangan
October 24, 2015
Aran: But that was the point, right? In a usual film, she’d have wept or some such thing. Here, her reaction is zany…
As I wrote above… Bahl keeps wanting to transcend the traditional registers of Hindi cinema.
A good thing, I think.
About, Overall, yes, this is a Karan Johar movie without KJo actually directing it.
I don’t know. The KJo “touches” were there — most pointedly in the little background ditties announcing the characters (like that “hottie” number for Shahid). But there were many scenes that had a more low-key indie sensibility, if you know what I mean.
PS: Did anyone get the point of the scene with lingerie on the plate? It came after the skinny-dipping scene, so is this a reference to that — as in Shahid saying “put some clothes on”? This is driving me nuts. Please to help 🙂
LikeLike
tonks
October 24, 2015
Ok, haven’t watched ‘My brother Nikhil’ yet.
LikeLike
Black Dynamite
October 24, 2015
Thanks for the reply Brangan, Yeah, I saw the movie and I can see what you mean, there seems to quite a few Bollywood movies that have fun elements but aren’t put together well.
LikeLike
Abhirup
October 24, 2015
You didn’t hurt my feelings, Mr. Rangan, and my apologies if that is what it seemed I was saying. You are one of the few bloggers around who understand what civility and courtesy mean. I didn’t concur with your take on the gay person in this movie, that’s all. I guess I should have been a little less acerbic, but it was directed not at you but at those who keep showing gay people in a specific, unflattering manner. Thanks for your reply.
LikeLike
Utkal
October 24, 2015
“I mean, Sanjay Kapoor as an exaggerated Sindhi type who never leaves his golden gun and who claims Queen Elizabeth is Sindhi. Sounds kinda nutty and fun, right? ”
Not really. Very unfunny, if you ask me. If I was Shahid, I would have rejected the film after listening to this attempt at humour. Of course I found the trailer distinctly unfunny and havent seen the film. But reading about the things that are supposedly funny, doesnt give me much hope either.
LikeLike
Vanya
October 24, 2015
“Is there even a single Indian main stream movie where people with a non-straight orientation are shown to be externally exactly like straight people, without feminine mannerisms ?”
Would you settle for 1 out of two gay characters in both Rules: pyaar ka superhit formula and Mumbai Police?
LikeLiked by 1 person
tonks
October 24, 2015
Vanya : I’d loved ‘Mumbai police’, huge respect towards Prithviraj for choosing that role. Had totally forgotten about that movie. One out of two is so right. The other guy’s characterisation had me cringing.
LikeLike
Rahul
October 24, 2015
I think Moonrise Kingdom could have been an inspiration. The visuals and animation were designed to have this feel like a fairy tale. And strains of the absurdist Wes Anderson humor were present all over.
I am no longer wondering what happened to the acting genes of Pankaj Kapoor. Maybe it was Supriya Pathak’s genes that made the difference. What a stunning debut by Sana Kapoor. I think she walked away with the film. I mean, I love Alia as much as the next person, but I couldn’t take my eyes off Sana when she was on screen. I think Alia needs to up her game a little. She is becoming too comfortable in front of the camera.
I will not begrudge KJo for the description of gay people in his movies. His gay characters start as caricaturish but end up as adequately realized, in my opinion. The message is that we are all Kantabens from Kal ho na ho if we are still shocked by homosexuality. And he does something new in each film, for example, in this movie, there was this “coming out is not a big deal” thing. That said, I would love to know what gay people feel about this.
LikeLike
Aran
October 24, 2015
BR: Low-key indie sensibility scenes – well, I’m willing to admit maybe I was unduly influenced in my perception right from the Dharma Productions’ distinctive production logo and insertion of Yash Johar’s miss you pic to the actual entry of Karan Johar and his Koffee-style wedding function. Not to mention other overt references. 🙂 But honestly, the overwhelming feeling as I was leaving the hall was exactly what I wrote in my first comment. That this was a Karan Johar movie without KJo as director.
So I wonder what influence production houses have on scripts / directors. How much of a say do you think Dharma Productions or Karan Johar had on the movie? Was it a matter of the movie being similar to the kind of movies made at Dharma originally and finding a fit there, or did the script evolve into something like it with the connection to the production house? Looking at Vikas Bahl’s other work, in capacities other than director as well, Shaandaar seems to be a departure from the kind of stuff he normally is associated with.
Also, someone should write ‘The Genealogy of Hindi Cinema’.
LikeLike
Abhirup
October 24, 2015
I think KJo’s portrayal of gay people are a blend of the fine and the nefarious. I like ‘Dostana’; the two-guys-acting-gay-to-rent-an-apartment scenario could become rather homophobic, but those pitfalls were mostly avoided, and the movie was still funny. The adolescent gay brother in ‘Gippi’ was also sympathetic. The short KJo made as part of ‘Bombay Talkies’ has its shortcomings, but the way it showed gays wasn’t one of them. On the other hand, the gay principal from ‘Student of the Year’ was as terrible a portrayal of a homosexual person as anyone can come up with, and the we-are-gay-except-we-aren’t bits in khnh were homophobic too. On the whole, he can do better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
October 24, 2015
tonks, do watch My Brother Nikhil; it’s a very sensitive portrayal of what it means to be gay in India. Also the Rahul Bose segment in I Am. Someone above has already mentioned Mumbai Police. Liked the portrayal of a gay person and a closeted homosexual in KJo’s part of Bombay Talkies.
LikeLike
tonks
October 25, 2015
Done, Anu. ‘My brother Nikhil’ and ‘I am’ gets into my will-see-soon list . Thanks :).
LikeLike
Abhirup
October 25, 2015
tonks: You may also give ‘Shabnam Mousi’ a try. It’s not about gays, but about the first transgender MLA in India. I have seen it very recently, and liked it. There’s a bit of the amateurishness that comes as a result of budget constraints for movies like this, and some parts of it could have been better, but overall, it is a fine movie. Ashutosh Rana is very good as Shabnam Mousi.
LikeLike
tonks
October 25, 2015
Thanks, Abhirup. Will do.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
October 25, 2015
BR, my tongue was firmly stuck in my cheek as I wrote that comment. 🙂
LikeLike
Apu
October 26, 2015
Tonks: I should have probably mentioned that as I am the shortest of my three sisters, I get teased for that too, esp when my mom sees me with my taller husband.
I am not really arguing that sexual orientation is something that needs to be made fun of or that I am fine with that. If at all, it is a very sensitive topic to bring up. In some ways, so is body shaming (for both overweight and underweight people).
My point was: family/friends, depending on the closeness that i have with them, can actually get away with laughing at me on a lot of things because I can sense whether they are being malicious or not. Now whether that would have extended to jokes about my sexual orientation or not, if I had been a lesbian, I am not sure.
LikeLiked by 2 people
tonks
October 26, 2015
Youre right, Apu. When teasing comes without malice from people we love, be they friends or family, I’m sure most of us would not have a problem with that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Abhirup
October 26, 2015
Has anyone here seen ‘Jhootha Hi Sahi’? It apparently shows a group of friends, two of whom are gay, and they are not mocked or teased for it. That seems interesting. I haven’t seen it, so would like to hear from people who have.
LikeLike
Madan Chopra (@mpmainka)
October 26, 2015
@rangan: The lingerie on the plate scene is after two of the leads spend a night at a waterfall where Alia says who wears clothes while taking a bath. Probably, Jagjinger picked it up when he arrived at the waterfall and chose to return it on the breakfast table for some laughs.
LikeLike
Arsaib (@Arsaib4)
October 30, 2015
@Aran: I think the repeated use of the word “naajayaz” by Alia Bhatt was meant to evoke the 1995 film by her father, Mahesh Bhatt. There was another instance where the characters repeatedly say “zindagi na milegi dobara,” clearly referencing Zoya Akhtar’s 2011 film. Neither works particularly well (like most of the rest of the movie, I guess), but I believe that was the intention.
LikeLike
Aran
October 30, 2015
Ahhh! That actually makes it a little bit better in my head. Thank you. 🙂
LikeLike
Pankaj
January 1, 2016
Fabulous review, Sir. I just watched it. The first thing that came to my mind after watching was another Kal Ho Naa Ho, the adopted Jia and the adopted Alia are strikingly similar, and Sushma Seth as the evil dadi in both the cases, adds a lot to the resemblance. Like Jia was their own sister, Alia also was borne of an affair and belonged to the family. Another KJo reference, perhaps.
Vikas Bahl’s last film Queen itself was sort of Alice In Wonderland as in one scene she wore the sweatshirt with that; perhaps, in Shaandaar, Bahl again explored a fairy-tale romance.
And, am I the only one who thought that the groom Robin Fundwani was also gay? His name Robin a la Batman and Robin’s gay rumors also ignited this curiosity; also, the way Robin danced in a strip club, and his obsession with eight packs.
LikeLike
Sev
March 29, 2017
I think this requires a Pareeniti Chopra type, Younger Preeti Zinta, or a young Hema Malini type spunky actress who also happens to look like a desirable female. Alia looks 12. And I think she will lookk so till she hits 34-35 after which she will appear too old as far as her screen age is concerned to work opposite younger heroes of the moment, and still look unconvincing opposite the older lot. Kjohar needs to accept defeat and stop casting her as the lead in these mainstream roles. My advice to him is to try putting his might behind Tapsee Punoo or Radhika Apte or Parineeti instead. Or invest his time and resources in finding someone who fits the mainstream bill better. We are a nation of a billion. I am sure we can come up with an age-appropriate, spunky performer who has the right spark opposite someone like Shahid, or whoevr is the chosen hero of the moment/film.
Ps:Brangan, you are far too patient towards the likes of Johar and his proteges. I can never see you turn into a grouchy scrooge even when in the throes of age and infirmity. Hats off to you, man! If you could bottle your patience and sell it for a reasonable price, I would be one of the keenest bidders 🙂
LikeLike