Spoilers ahead…
We remember Charles Sobhraj as a serial killer, but Prawaal Raman’s biopic (though it doesn’t actually call itself one, or use the name “Sobhraj”) Main Aur Charles isn’t very interested in murders and gore. It follows the time-tested Godfather or Don strategy of hinting at a bad side but focusing on the things that will make the character an attractive protagonist. A hero, even. Charles (an excellent Randeep Hooda) gets the kind of entry the leading man gets in a Tamil or Telugu masala blockbuster. First, the feet. Finally, the face. And there’s a reason. The film makes the case that Charles is a celebrity. He’s such a superstar by the time of his arrest in Goa that the lowly cop who caught him becomes something of a star himself. He soon finds himself regaling others with his how-I-caught-Charles stories during dinner at an upscale restaurant. He doesn’t know it yet, but there’s a reason he’s telling these stories. It’s the film’s delicious twist.
The centrepiece of Main Aur Charles is Sobhraj’s escape from Tihar jail, which is first-rate material for a thriller. Only, seeing the film, you wouldn’t know it for a while. For the longest time, we seem to be watching a real-life Maxim photo shoot, with woman after undressed woman falling for Charles’s charms. He was a smooth talker, a hypnotiser, a lady-killer in more ways than one. And he filled up voids in more ways than one. “I must say tumhari life kitni exciting hai,” coos a princess, dulled by the monotony of wealth and now intrigued by Charles’s (fake) plan to help a few dissenters. As for Mira (Richa Chadda, horribly miscast as a breathless innocent), she hates her very name. It’s too ordinary, she says. Charles makes her life so extraordinary that she goes on to argue, after being arrested as Charles’s accomplice, that he is the product of a dysfunctional family and a system that failed him. These women were a big part of Charles’s life, true – but Raman keeps hitting this point so insistently that we want to say: We get it. Can we move on to the jailbreak, please?
Another problem is the way the film is structured, edited. It’s a slick, Hollywood approach, with slivers of this event segueing into slivers of that one. (You could say Main Aur Charles tries to be as cool as it imagines Charles to be.) Some parts are confusing (just who are these foreigners with Charles, and why not tell us how they came to be with him?) and there’s no grip. It’s just one escapade after another. But after Charles’s arrest, which happens around midpoint, the film settles down and becomes a very watchable story about a very warped man. (Someone claims he ate a lizard in jail.) The seventies/eighties details are great fun. The Dyanora Solid State TVs. The club dancer with the plaited string across her forehead, singing Jab chaye tera jadoo. The wacka-chaka background music, from films like Don. In fact, Salim-Javed could have based their script on Charles instead of Chinatown. As the police here routinely discover, Charles ko pakadna mushkil hi nahin, namumkin hai.
Even more fun is Adil Hussain, as Amod Kanth, the cop on Charles’s tail and the “main” of the title. His scenes with his wife (Tisca Chopra) are a quiet riot, especially when he finds her appearing a little too fascinated by Charles. You can hear him thinking, I can handle all these other women falling for him… but you too? But that’s the man Charles supposedly was, and we’re teased with hints about this enigma. After his arrest, a cop reads out names from his multiple passports and asks, “Tum ho kaun?” Charles replies, with a smile, “Sab.” Hooda’s smile never slips. It’s more of a smirk, as if he’s playing a game. He keeps clippings of newspaper stories about him, and when he finds one with an unflattering picture, he screams, “Press ko naye pictures bhej do.” Talk about star tantrums. An associate warns Charles that it’s just a matter of time before the cops catch up with them. Charles replies, smile intact, “Let’s see ow long zey take.” Ze accent comes from Charles’s French roots. Ze beret too. But he prefers German films, like Metropolis. It’s hard to fault a film for falling head over heels for such an international man of mystery.
KEY:
- Main Aur Charles = Charles and I
- Don = the film that this film was a remake of
- “I must say tumhari life kitni exciting hai” = I must say your life is so exciting.
- Jab chaye tera jadoo = see here
- The wacka-chaka background music = see here
- Chinatown = see here
- Charles ko pakadna mushkil hi nahin, namumkin hai = a riff on a famous line from Don
- “Tum ho kaun?” = Who are you?
- “Sab” = Everyone.
- “Press ko naye pictures bhej do” = Send new pictures to the press.
- Metropolis = see here
Copyright ©2015 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
S
November 4, 2015
Were SBI car loans there in the 70s ?
LikeLike
Ramji
November 4, 2015
“We remember Charles Sobhraj as a serial killer, but Prawaal Raman’s biopic (though it doesn’t actually call itself one, or use the name “Sobhraj”)”
Saar didn’t you notice the autograph of Charles Sobhraj in the title? It says Best of luck with a sign and dated 25-10-15. Not sure if he has seen the film
LikeLike
tonks
November 4, 2015
He was in the news in my teens, it was probably during the time of his jail break. I distinctly remember a cover story in Sun magazine. The write up and his persona seemed like something taken from the movies.
LikeLike
NeDhaPa
November 4, 2015
didn’t know he had french roots, charles that is. There is something intriguing about Hooda; magnetic; can’t take eyes off him when he is on screen. He has that gravitas, it factor I suppose, similar to bachchan.
LikeLike
A
November 5, 2015
Among the current crop, Randeep Hooda is the only one who is an actor, one who can act, but falls short of being that star up above, no one can touch or own. I think of Hooda and then I think of Khans or Bachchan Junior and the comparison just seems so wrong. Hooda is in a league of his own but has never had that ‘wonderment’ among the audiences like the way even much lesser deserved male [un]actors are privileged to get. In this sense, it is not about Hooda not being recognized and getting his dues from the industry and the audiences but something that the man and actor himself lacks and fortunately, Hooda seems to quite aware of it.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
November 5, 2015
I always wondered what it takes for women to fall in love with men they know are bad news. I mean, here’s a man in jail for murdering women, and then other women throw themselves at him? Why? What’s the attraction? They will be the one person for whom he will change his ways? Or the fascination of the snake for the mongoose? Sobhraj would have killed to have been in his prime today, in the age of so much social media. He orchestrated his press so well, I’m wondering how it would have been if he had Twitter and FB at his fingertips.
I’ve liked Randeep Hooda as an actor, from the time I watched him in Monsoon Wedding. He brings a certain competence to his roles, and is very unaffected doing so. Now. All I have to do is watch this movie. 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
November 5, 2015
Can anyone help? Something’s happened to my memory. It’s been a crazy few weeks and I just can’t seem to remember writing about this movie…
Dear Mr. Rangan,
I’ve been subscribed to your newsletter for few months now (since I was smitten by Imtiaz Ali’s Highway & Randeep Hooda’s performance & wanted some more insight on the movie).
I read a few days/weeks ago (can’t exactly remember when) a critique about a movie, not Hindi, maybe Tamil or Malayalam. I don’t remember the name of the movie & I cannot seem to find the related post in your blog.
It tells the story of a girl, the first female born in her family after 3 generations of males. She is respected & highly appreciated by her family, even her grandfather speaks with her with respect.
She turns out to be the reincarnation of his mother or grandmother, & she is back for revenge.
I googled it then & the story was interesting.
The problem is I cannot remember the name of the movie & I cannot find your post.
Can you help me please ?!?!
Thanks a lot,
LikeLike
bart
November 5, 2015
The movie might be “Arundhati” from Telugu. But not sure if you’ve written about it.
LikeLike
Yossarian
November 5, 2015
Saar, the movie is Arundhati, but I am pretty sure you haven’t reviewed it given your (lack of) penchant for horror movies 🙂
LikeLike
tonks
November 6, 2015
Anu : Rhett Butler over Ashley Wilkes, Joker over Batman, Reggie over Archie, Elvis Presley over Cliff Richard, Snape over Dumbledore. Any day 😉
I’ve got a friend who thinks Ravan and Duryodhan are hotter than Ram and Arjun. Because at some level, evil is cool and good is boring. Isn’t Voldemort a million times cooler than Harry Potter? 🙂
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
November 9, 2015
tonks: Rhett over Ashley, certainly; I don’t have any particular preference for either Joker or Batman, but Jughead above Reggie OR Archie! 🙂 I find Karna the best of the Mahabharata lot, and in the Ramayana, I find all of them rather painful. Every dashed one of them.
I like it when my men skirt the boundaries of danger, but personal integrity is a must. So I certainly don’t understand the magnetic attraction of a serial killer. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rahini David
November 9, 2015
Tonks: The following quote in the given link may amuse you.
JKR: It amuses me. It honestly amuses me. People have been waxing lyrical [in letters] about Draco Malfoy, and I think that’s the only time when it stopped amusing me and started almost worrying me. I’m trying to clearly distinguish between Tom Felton, who is a good looking young boy, and Draco, who, whatever he looks like, is not a nice man. It’s a romantic, but unhealthy, and unfortunately all too common delusion of — delusion, there you go — of girls, and you [nods to Melissa] will know this, that they are going to change someone. And that persists through many women’s lives, till their death bed, and it is uncomfortable and unhealthy and it actually worried me a little bit, to see young girls swearing undying devotion to this really imperfect character, because there must be an element in there, that “I’d be the one who [changes him].” I mean, I understand the psychology of it, but it is pretty unhealthy. So, a couple of times I have written back, possibly quite sharply, saying [Laughter], “You want to rethink your priorities here.”
http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2005/0705-tlc_mugglenet-anelli-2.htm
LikeLiked by 2 people
tonks
November 9, 2015
Anu: To be quite honest I agree totally about Jughead and Karna but they wouldn’t have helped my point 😉
Rahini: I think all the girls had a crush on Tom Felton and not exactly Draco. Even Emma Watson, I think, has admitted to one, during the shooting.
But there is, I think, for many people a definite attraction towards a shade of negativity. This link tries to explain this strange phenomenon :
https://googleweblight.com/?lite_url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201310/why-do-women-fall-bad-boys&ei=yZ8g5GnF&lc=en-IN&s=1&m=448&ts=1447056761&sig=APONPFmGMYUxoke7OsJlrwRej91gs1UDRw
Women found the Dark Triad personality more attractive than the control. This result is in keeping with previous studies in which Dark Triad men reported their increased level of sexual success.What might explain this result? Carter and his colleagues offer two possible explanations. First, sexual selection might be at work. This would mean that women are responding to signals of “male quality” when it comes to reproduction. And with respect to short-term mating, women may be drawn to ‘bad boys’, who demonstrate confidence, stubbornness, and risk-taking tendencies. Second, sexual conflict may be at play. The investigators state that “Women may be responding to DT men’s ability to ‘sell themselves’; a useful tactic in a co-evolutionary ‘arms race’ in which men convince women to pursue the former’s preferred sexual strategy.” They note that like a “used-car dealer,” Dark Triad men may be effective charmers and manipulators, furthering their success at short-term mating.
LikeLike
tonks
November 9, 2015
Do we all not get a little confused between the actor and his character? Like Cumberbatch’s Sherlock. Or Matthew MacFadyen’s Darcy…. 🙂
So Rahini, I suppose it dosent exactly hurt Draco’s fan following that Felton can sing a bit and strum a guitar. Check this out and tell me, would anyone vote Potter or Weasley cooler than Felton’s Malfoy 🙂
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
November 10, 2015
tonks, the one I personally liked best in the Potter series – in the book – was Sirius Black. Was very disappointed when the person on screen didn’t match my imagined version of him at all! My favourite characters in the movies were the Weasley twins.
Have never liked the grungy white male look, so Felton isn’t ‘cool’. 🙂 I doubt I would think he was cool even if I were of the age to think him so. I’m thinking about my crushes when I was younger, and there were Sean Connery/Harrison Ford/Cary Grant/Pierce Brosnan/James Stewart/Rupert Everett – I guess, amongst them all, Pierce Brosnan is the only one whom I would call conventionally good looking. I’m just realising they were all men, not boys, when I’d crushes on them. 🙂
But I do agree with what JKR said about Felton/Malfoy. I find that trend distressing, but fact is, it isn’t new. That women hope to ‘change’ the man they love with is a trope that has existed ever since time began. And that truth is declared by girls who think Malfoy is ‘cool’ or crush on Felton because of his on-screen role, or those who pen love letters to Charles Sobhraj – they’re at two ends of the spectrum.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rahini David
November 20, 2015
Anu: If Sean Connery/Harrison Ford/Cary Grant/James Stewart/Rupert Everett are not conventionally good looking, then you are using the wrong conventions for refernce. They all have what is called “Classic Good Looks”.
LikeLike