In the year of DiCaprio, some thoughts on acting and this year’s Oscar for Best Actor.
One moment during this year’s Golden Globes left me misty-eyed. It was when an actor, long overlooked, took home a prize. Clearly, others in that glitzy hall felt the way I did, for they gave the actor a standing ovation. Everyone seemed happy he’d finally won. I refer, of course, to Sylvester Stallone, who took home his first Golden Globe: Best Supporting Actor for playing Rocky Balboa in Creed. He’s the reason I’ll be watching the Oscars on February 28 – he’s nominated, again, for Best Supporting Actor. Don’t ask me to explain it. It’s a generational thing. You have to have been around when the Rocky movies meant a big deal, you have to have that Bill Conti theme ringing in your head every time you decide to start gymming again. I feel an… affection for Stallone that I don’t for the other Supporting Actor nominees, whom I merely respect: Christian Bale (The Big Short), Tom Hardy (The Revenant), Mark Ruffalo (Spotlight), Mark Rylance (Bridge of Spies). If you tell me Stallone cannot do what the superb Rylance did in Bridge of Spies, then I’m just going to say, “And vice versa.” Besides, these award ceremonies aren’t always about who deserves to win. They’re also about who you’d like to see win.
There’s another actor, this year, everyone would like to see win: Leonardo DiCaprio. I hope he does. I like watching him on screen. He isn’t a Great in my book, but he’s good and he’s consistent, as he’s proved in many films – even in ones, like J. Edgar, where he’s been hilariously miscast. My only major complaint with this actor is that he doesn’t act his age very often. For someone who’s just stepped into his forties, his resumé is remarkably light on… light roles. Watch him cut loose in Django Unchained, and you get a full measure of why he’s such a major star. He’s magnetic, he’s feral, he’s fun – he’s what people are when they’re the one per cent of the one per cent. You feel you’re seeing the side he shows those supermodels he keeps dating. DiCaprio is most inspired when indulging in some kind of caddishness. The Wolf of Wall Street. Catch Me If You Can. The Great Gatsby. Even Titanic, the movie that made Leo Le-ohhh!, had him play a grown-up version of the Artful Dodger. But in the heavy stuff (Blood Diamond, Inception, Shutter Island), his range shrinks, boxed between two settings: “earnest” and “worried.” He keeps frowning like he’s carrying the fate of mankind in that frown.
These aren’t bad performances at all, but you sense a sameness – and you sense the strain. I’m doing all this heavy lifting, dammit, give me that Oscar already! And one reason I hope DiCaprio gets this Oscar is so it liberates him to take on roles where he doesn’t have to eat bison liver on the sets. Yes, that’s one of the things he did for The Revenant, as the publicity machine around the movie has drummed into everyone who picks up a newspaper or clicks on a hyperlink. More from the machine: He waded into frozen rivers!!! He decided not to wrap the tops of his fingers in warming bandages on the first day of shooting!!! He almost got hypothermia!!! He slept in animal carcasses!!! You may be reminded of the (maybe apocryphal) anecdote from the sets of Marathon Man, when Dustin Hoffman, in order to simulate sleeplessness, stayed up for many days and nights, only to get this reaction from his incredulous co-star, Laurence Olivier: “Dear boy, why don’t you just try acting?”
But in Olivier’s time, one could still treat the cinema screen as an extension of the stage. The theatre/opera director Richard Eyre, beautifully summed up Olivier’s performing style as “marked by high energy, a bravura romanticism and more than a touch of camp.” Hoffman, on the other hand, was a product of the post-Brando era, where it wasn’t just enough to put on a sad face, you had to remember the time you were five and your stepfather snatched your ice-cream cone away and your stepmother cackled as she squelched it in the mud. Suddenly, acting had transformed from embodying to… being. And what good was it if only you knew what you were putting yourself through? Slowly, actors realised that they had to not just impress their directors while making the movie but also, after shooting wrapped, impress upon the world how much “acting” they did. Hence, from the late-sixties onwards, the widely publicised phenomenon of “suffering for one’s art.” Hoffman putting pebbles in his shoe to keep his limp consistent in Midnight Cowboy. De Niro upholstering himself with 60 pounds for Raging Bull. Nicole Kidman dowdy-ing up for The Hours. We are at a point where acting isn’t so much about vanishing into a role as making the efforts visible.
But can you really blame actors, DiCaprio included, for wanting to externalize so internal a process? If you portray a writer who’s thinking, most people are going to think you’re just sitting there. But stick a cigarette in the corner of the mouth, keep a glass of whiskey at hand, clack away furiously at a typewriter – now you have something people can point to as a performance. Matt Damon gave a superb performance in The Martian. It’s also a great “movie star” performance, one that distils and showcases the things about a star that make him a star. But it’s too… Matt Damon. It doesn’t look like he did anything. It’s as if he just showed up on the set. But DiCaprio in The Revenant… ah! It’s a performance not just with a capital P but also a capital ERFORMANCE. Plus, did you note the spin DiCaprio put on his efforts at the Golden Globes when accepting his Best Actor trophy, talking about awareness of indigenous cultures and corporate greed? The people who vote for these awards like to think they’re rewarding something… worthy. Not only did DiCaprio suffer, he’s now saving the world. Give him the Best Actor statuette already.
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2016 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Harish S
January 23, 2016
where is the Oscar for Ulaganayagan??? he did the same in Marudanayam 2 decades back!!
LikeLike
MANK
January 23, 2016
Brangan, my sentiments exactly on Stallone. It was very moving to see him get the golden globes. Even though my movie watching started after the first of the Rocky series wound down, I have a certain affection for him. He was really good in something like Copland and always felt that he never got his due as an actor because he was always pigeonholed as Rocky and Rambo
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
January 23, 2016
Reg. Leo, I think since his superstardom post Titanic, he had this feeling to assert himself as a thespian as he felt to be in danger of been treated merely as a star- which is actually a good thing- but the roles he chose for that purpose were not appropriate for him
Apart from catch me if you can and the Departed- where he was superb, the rest were not suitable for him, some embarrassingly bad like the aviator and J Edgar. He just doesn’t have the maturity and the talent to pull them off.
And it seems that the Olivier Hoffman story is more apocryphal than real, like much of these stories are
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1M6Kh5AXF0M
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
January 23, 2016
Great piece Baradwaj. I thought Leo was brilliant in Django Unchained. Pity he didn’t even get a nomination for that. He is outstanding in Revenant and the effort that he puts in can be clearly seen. Me thinks that someone like Christian Bale would have been effortless in that role but hope Leo gets it for the hard work that he has put in over the years. On a related note, isn’t it remarkable that Hollywood actors are so sincere to their profession. They put in so much effort and the physical transformation that they manage is remarkable: Bale in ‘American Hustle’, ‘Machinist’ etc., Jhonny Depp in Black Mass, Leo and Tom Hardy in Revenant etc. Most of our actors refuse to even grow a beard.
LikeLike
Iswarya
January 23, 2016
Raj Balakrishnan: “Most of our actors refuse to even grow a beard.”
That could be a demand-supply thing! The chimeric youth-audience that our movies are targeted at (according to the industry’s wisdom, at least) don’t ask for anything other than more of the same-old, except for raising the pitch further and further: so we get more of macho posturing, an alarming amount of gore, shrinking levels of skimpy clothing on the increasingly bimboish female leads, not to mention heavy doses of sexism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raj Balakrishnan
January 23, 2016
Iswarya, the general argument, that our actors dish out, is that this is what the people want. The question is how do they know without even trying. Someone like Vijay looks the bloody same and does the same thing in each and every one of his movies.
LikeLike
venkatesh
January 23, 2016
@MANK : Excellent comment, my movie watching started with Rambo II and i still remember feeling the shakes after coming out of the theatre. Revisiting it , clearly the movie is jingoistic crap but Stallone put his all to it.
I think after a certain age, actors who last somehow get transformed into loveable senior statesmen. This is a transformation that’s happening with Arnold as well, he’s gone from being a joke to a man mountain to governor to this great cool grandpa, uncle everyone wants to have.
@Iswarya: “That could be a demand-supply thing!”
Is it really though? I keep thinking this is a very myopic view of the landscape. Surely, its not just the youth of a certain strata who watch films. Agreed, they make the most noise everywhere however I don’t think that really translates to ticket sales.
I posit that a well-made “serious” film targeted and distributed correctly would have enough takers to make it a viable proposition.
LikeLike
Amit Joki
January 23, 2016
Dhanush would have got an Oscar by now, if he did work with the A-list directors of Hollywood with equally good scripts.
I mean, he got the so-called Indian Oscar, The Filmfare Award for the Best Actor in Debut for Raanjhanaa and he was nominated for “The Best Actor”.
And his Shamitabh performance was equally good, but since it tanked, I’m sure he’d win none this time around. And would be overwhelmingly happy if he did.
Now, this comment is off-topic, and none of you would be with me on this. Still, grabs popcorn
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kurinji
January 23, 2016
“He keeps frowning like he’s carrying the fate of mankind in that frown”
Who cares .. its leohhhh! after all. He can frown fidget and fumble all he wants on the screen, there will still be some serious swooning
LikeLike
sanjana
January 23, 2016
When you want something badly, it evades you. Forget Oscars and awards, you will be liberated. It is only a statue.
LikeLike
Sutheesh Kumar. P. S.
January 23, 2016
Super title Saar!
LikeLiked by 2 people
MI
January 23, 2016
Spot on about Leo’s acting. He is definitely not bad. But you don’t feel anything special in his acting. Many of his roles could have been done by others. It’s not like you couldn’t imagine other actors in Wolf of Wall Street, Django Unchained and Shutter Island etc. I did enjoy the first two, but I would mind if he was replaced by another competent actor.
Another thing based on some comments here. I don’t know why one is considered a good actor only if they change their looks for every movie. I think most people couldn’t appreciate or recognize real acting and the only way they could recognize acting is if the actor lose/gain weight or make their face unrecognizable. Matt Damon in ‘The Martian’ is a good example. He used a body double for the scenes where he is supposed to look emaciated and the acting looked effortless. So it is just another ordinary role to many people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raj Balakrishnan
January 23, 2016
MI, it is not about changing one’s appearance. It is about the actor’s dedication to his craft. Just look at the lengths that Christian Bale goes for each of his roles. Do you see any Indian actor doing that?
LikeLike
Nari
January 23, 2016
In my opinion Leo is an overrated actor. I mean he has that ‘Look ma, I am great at acting’ face whenever he does any serious roles. He is good for light weight roles where is having fun. As for this year’s oscars Eddie Redmayne might give him a close fight for The Danish Girl.
LikeLike
Prasad
January 23, 2016
Hi BR,
Excellent Article.
“But it’s too… Matt Damon. It doesn’t look like he did anything. It’s as if he just showed up on the set.”
Completely agreed. Actually this year seems to be a kind of a record for oscars itself for having so many mediocre movies and nominations IMO… Jennifer Lawrence for Joy (Very mediocre movie and performance) or Eddie Redmayne… seems like a manipulative role for oscar.
Definitely Leo should win considering all his past works( My Fav is Wolf of Wall Street)…..
For best actresses definitely seems like “Brie Larson” considering the other nominees are so weak.
“Besides, these award ceremonies aren’t always about who deserves to win. “
Absolutely agreed! How can we explain “How green was my Valley” winning against ” Citizen Kane” or even last year whole world expected “Michael Keaton” to win and he lost to Eddie.
Was looking at the best picture nominations of 1977. Just Mind boggling…. It’s Rocky winning against all odds against “All the Presidents Men, Network and the Trend Setting Urban Noir “Taxi Driver”.
What a task would have been for the academy to vote our the other movies! It will be great if Stallone wins this year.
These upsets are part and parcel of Oscar and always there have been some favorites and some exclusions. Martin Scorsese not winning for “Raging Bull” and Taxi Driver and just Managing to win for “The Departed”.
Even if we take last year Jake Gyllenhaal should have at least got nominated for “Nightcrawler” but he didn’t get. It was a terrific performance. I think next to Leo definitely he has the Talent and is a upcoming actor who attempts different roles.
“Hence, from the late-sixties onwards, the widely publicized phenomenon of “suffering for one’s art.”
Agreed. But there do you think a actor should draw a line for performance for the role Vs Desperation (to win something)? We’ve seen so many actors over period of time trying to do anything and everything right. Some of them look confused… if you reduce weight and have a deformed or face…. that is great on the actor’s part.
LikeLike
Sutheesh Kumar. P. S.
January 24, 2016
BR, i been noticing the images you have picked recently to go with your posts, absolutely fantastic, the one accompanying this piece is a bona fide work of art. Though i’m a novice i realise you have wonderful eye for photography.
LikeLike
Sutheesh Kumar. P. S.
January 24, 2016
‘Not only did DiCaprio suffer, he’s now saving the world. Give him the Best Actor statuette already.’
Ouch! Cynicism at it’s best.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saurabh
January 24, 2016
But can you really blame actors, DiCaprio included, for wanting to externalize so internal a process? If you portray a writer who’s thinking, most people are going to think you’re just sitting there. But stick a cigarette in the corner of the mouth, keep a glass of whiskey at hand, clack away furiously at a typewriter – now you have something people can point to as a performance.
I dont think its about actors “wanting” to externalize to show a “performance”. The nature of the film medium in itself is about showing actions and incidents. No? Its about showing the internal state of mind and emotions by actions, by varying the rhythm and pace during an action and by repetition-and-variation of the same action during different time periods etc.
Directors/Writers have always struggled/strived to find incidents and actions (limited by context and situation) which can showcase internal feelings and emotions of a character.
Take for example, the opening scene of Charulata (first 10 minutes), where the director establishes Charu’s boredom at home just by the means I mentioned above. Even her excitement on seeing someone from her window highlights her boredom. Now it can be argued that if she is bored, she will just sit around looking in a void but how un-cinematic that would be.
Or to cite a writing example, in the same movie (between 10:30 to 14:30), director beautifully externalizes Charu’s internal struggles to write her first story by external actions, variations in rhythm and pace, flashback-showing-her-thinking-process. Again, it would be very un-cinematic if none of this is externalized and she just sits there thinking, looking in the void.
LikeLiked by 1 person
RT
January 24, 2016
Stallone was great in First Blood as a Vietnam vet suffering from PTSD. The later movies turned him into an invincible action hero and he then stuck to doing similar kind of roles until Copland. He’s a good actor when he tries but he hasn’t really tried to do different roles.
OTOH, Leo has had a more diverse career but I’m not sure if he’s a better actor than Stallone. I think the only reason he’s won and been nominated for so many awards is that, as Alan Rickman said, roles win awards rather than actors and he’s made better choices when accepting roles.
LikeLike
Karthik
January 24, 2016
I’m all in favor of Leo winning the Oscar and acting in ‘light’ films in the future, as long as he doesn’t degenerate into acting in films like ‘Dirty Grandpa’ two decades from now. It was painful to watch one of the greatest actors of our times being reduced to a caricature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bunny
January 24, 2016
@BR: Good to see a modern-day Indian film critic getting misty-eyed in today’s times when it’s considered ‘uncool’ to express one’s emotions. It’s amazing how filmmakers change the way film critics react. In the times of ‘masala’ values it was normal to get misty-eyed or emotional but it’s considered unacceptable in the era of Anurag Kashyap & Co. Nice to see someone bend the rule, even if for Hollywood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Swati Harsha
January 24, 2016
Till i read your article, i was on praying for leo to win…. having read it i am praying even more… its so true what you said. Probably an oscar will liberate him, and allow him to relax a little. He seems to be trapped in his own expectations. I am yet to come across an actor who was so copy book about getting the oscar, he has ticked all the check boxes… with the save the world parting shot…. you are right give him the statuette already.
LikeLike
MI
January 24, 2016
Raj: Different actors have different styles. I like Christian Bale too. But my point is that going to extremes for a role shouldn’t be the sole criteria of good acting. For example, for a movie called ‘6’, actor Sham lost weight and changed his appearance drastically. Similarly Vishal struggled for his role in ‘Avan Ivan’. That doesn’t make them great actors. Vikram is the worst offender. He may be an above average performer. But he is considered a good actor by many solely by his well publicized efforts and the lengths he abused his body for various roles. Most good actors make their impact not by changing looks but by simply altering their body language and dialogue delivery to suit the role. Sometimes they make acting look easy.
LikeLike
Shankar
January 24, 2016
Baddy, I know your long term view on Leo and would agree with most of it, but it’s difficult for me to agree on your take on Blood Diamond. The film was heavy, but his role has a certain impishness, a rogue with the slightest romance thrown it. Plus he did carry out the Afrikaans slang quite beautifully. It’s one of my fav roles!
Plus on the note of externalizing the internal, Kamal would be a prime offender but we seem to celebrate it. Different strokes for different folks, I guess!
LikeLike
Varun
January 25, 2016
It all comes down to one question.. What performance is considered Oscar worthy… My point of reference is always the performance of Christopher Waltz portraying “Hans Landa”.. Everytime I think of that Character, It brings me chills.. Waltz lived the character so Naturally that you can sense what the character thinks by Just looking into the eyes.. The same goes with the portrayal of Lincoln by Daniel Day Lewis.. You never see Daniel day lewis anywhere.. Its as if a hidden camera is capturing the Life of Lincoln.. Can we say the same for Leonardo’s portrayal of Hugh Glass? Was Leonardo able to get into the skin of Hugh glass and show us Who really was Hugh Glass? Though Leonardo underwent huge ordeals for portraying the character, Unfortunately, I never really see Hugh glass anywhere on screen.. I see only Leonardo surviving not Hugh glass.. To me the real oscar deserving performance for Leonardo was his portrayal of Calvin J. Candie in Django Unchained. Never in the movie i saw the Star Lenordo.. I just saw a indulgent and horrendous racist on Screen.. To me thats an oscar worthy performance..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Siddhartha Srivastava
January 25, 2016
The thing about Leo’s performance in “The Revenant” is… it could have been played by any decent actor. I appreciate the physicality of the performance, but I don’t think he did anything special that another actor could not have done. It’s the nature of the role + overdue factor that’s pushing him towards the win. He should’ve won for “The Wolf of Wall Street”, IMO – a true “star” performance where I could not have imagined any other actor playing the same role with such brilliance.
I agree with you – can’t begrudge his inevitable win too much, given that he’s been one of the most consistent actors in recent times, although I think Michael Fassbender deserves the win because he delivers the best performance among the five nominees – and is also a better actor than Leo overall. But, his time will come and he’ll probably end up winning for a mediocre role.
On a side not, the Best Picture race this year is the closes it’s been in nearly a decade, with the precursors already splitting between “Spotlight”, “The Big Short” and “The Revenant”. Should be an interesting Oscar year – I hope “Mad Max: Fury Road” cleans up the techs, at the very least (fingers crossed for George Miller, though).
LikeLike
ds
January 25, 2016
Kamal can internalize beautifully as well. Hence why his portrayals in Moondram Pirai, Kokila, Pesum padam, Mahanadhi, and loads more, are still classics. Genius he is.
LikeLike
Amit Joki
January 25, 2016
Okay, completely off topic again and I might look like an idiot doing this again after receiving many a lot of dislikes for my previous comment.
But, it is as if, Dhanush read this blog and decided that something should be done about it, as he has apparently taken the initial step to hollywood, and a BIG one at that.
He is now the lead actor for The Extraordinary Journey Of The Fakir Who Got Trapped In An Ikea Cupboard. helmed, by the Oscar winning director of Persepolis fame, Marjane Satrape, and know who will be sharing space with him?
None other than the Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill star, Uma Thurman, along with hold your breath, Alexandra Daddario, of True Detective fame.
My job is done here. Go on tear me apart now
LikeLike
KayKay
January 25, 2016
Loved, loved, loved Creed! It’s quite amazing what director Ryan Coogler did. Contrary to the usual practice of taking intriguing or entertaining supporting characters in one film and propping them up front and center for the next, usually to lesser effect (Anakin Skywalker, Obi-Wan, Hannibal Lecter, Minions etc),Creed did the reverse, which was to take the iconic Rocky Balboa and make him a supporting character.
And this is as it should be, for Rocky’s arc was well and truly done by the 6th movie. Creed was Adonis’ story, but what I wasn’t prepared for, and was well and truly blown away by, was Stallone’s performance. Here I was, thinking the movie would role-reverse Rocky as Apollo, but instead it gave us Rocky as Mickey, not so much a mere coach but a mentor with a deep co-dependent relationship with his charge. (I tell everyone, Creed is best enjoyed when you see it after watching the previous 6 Rocky movies)
And damn, if these cynical eyes didn’t start tearing up when seeing one of the most chiseled actors of his generation play a chunky, balding, retching-over-a toilet-bowl,cancer-ravaged but still dignified ex-pugilist. I’m happy as a pig in shit that Stallone won the Best supporting Actor (dare we hope this is repeated for the Oscars?). If anything, this should be a wake-up call for Stallone that it’s well and truly time to put The Expendables and Rambo out to pasture and graduate, a la Bruce Willis, Harrison Ford or closer to home, our very own Amitabh, to Elder Statesman. He’s proven that he’s now developed other muscles, like the acting kind.
LikeLike
KayKay
January 25, 2016
Varun: I’ve seen Christophe Waltz in IB, The Green Hornet, Water For Elephants, Django, The 3 Musketeers, Horrible Bosses 2 and Spectre, and have come to the rather uncomfortable realization that he can ONLY play roles like that, in that way. He’s definitely a victim of typecasting, but barring Polanski’s underrated and under-seen Carnage where he was quite effective as a a self-centered husband (yes, still a prick, but not quite a loathsome one), he hasn’t demonstrated a lot of range. But I agree with im absolutely deserving the Best Supporting Actor for IB. Lifetime Oscars aside, Awards are given out for specific roles, not an entire body of work
Day-Lewis? No argument there. One of the greats of his generation. A truly brilliant and chameleon-like thespian.
Siddhartha Srivastava: “The thing about Leo’s performance in “The Revenant” is… it could have been played by any decent actor. I appreciate the physicality of the performance, but I don’t think he did anything special that another actor could not have done”
I agree. My point is, if awards are going to be bestowed for how much an actor suffered for his role, Christian Bale should have walked off with one for The Machinist, or Fassbender for “Hunger”, or Jim Caviezel for The Passion of The Christ.
Can’t really say that I can’t imagine any other actor playing the Wolf of Wall Street. I was thinking how many more layers a Tom Hardy could have brought to that role. Or a Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
Like Varun, the Leo performance I thoroughly enjoyed was his Calvin Candie in Django. But Leo would seem to be cursed for giving an ace performance in a movie that also happens to feature another compelling character brought to life by a talented actor. Calvin COULD have been the most interesting character in Django had it not had Stephen the Butler. Candie was a white racist in a movie filled with them, but a Black Man insinuating himself into the existing power structure to help the very people enslaving his own race? And Sam Jackson was just brilliant, equal parts fawning toady and cunning collaborator.
And this curse has extended to The Revenant as well (which, by the way, is a straightforward revenge tale minus the Gorgeous Visuals and Odysseus-like quest it sends it’s protagonist on). It’s not so much Leo’s role I remember but Tom Hardy’s brutal Antagonist
LikeLike
durai
January 25, 2016
Amit, that’s good news. Looks like you are looking for our opinion on Dhanush, undoubtedly a good actor when he is not doing formula films like Maari, Thanga magan. Jury is still out whether he could improve or just peter out.
Marjane Satrapi live action films are average but her animation film, Persepolis was good. I really hope Dhanush is not cast in roles like Dev Patel.
LikeLike
MANK
January 25, 2016
If anything, this should be a wake-up call for Stallone that it’s well and truly time to put The Expendables and Rambo out to pasture
KayKay, oh actually Stallone had periodically tried to go the dramatic way in his career, but he was hindered by the fact that those films themselves didnt work or were critical and commercial disappointments. In the early 90’s he did try to do different roles like the more dramatic Lock up or the disastrous comedies Oscar and Stop or my mom will shoot, which unfortunately only he found funny. By the time he did copland, his career was already on the skids with duds like Judge dredd and Daylight and was not enough to stem the rot. If you look at his early output, even after the first Rocky he had tried a lot Dramatic roles like FIST and Paradise alley and was thought of as an actor more in the vein of Deniro and others. Even First Blood was more an Anti hero character rather than a straightforward action hero. it is his bitter rivalry with Schwarzenneger that derailed him and finally destroyed him. He never could find the more dramatic contrast to his action stuff like the way Bruce willis did with Pulp Fiction and Sixth sense against Die hard or Armageddon. Hopefully now at 70 years old, he will finally get those roles and films that his talent deserves.
LikeLike
Amit Joki
January 25, 2016
Durai, thanks for your opinion. Actually, I know BR’s opinion on Dhanush and I quite like it. I did believe in my first comment and still do so, and I knew of the response already.
Yeah, I didn’t like him too much in Maari and in the second half of Thangamagan (not liking is too strong a word for me to use though)
I’ve not seen any of her movies, but this movie is going to be a comical-travel genre… if such a thing exists.
And the premise is actually good and the casting is amazing. I’ve heard Gemma Arteton, Seema Biswas, Barkhad Abdi, are also the part of the cast.
I’ve heard that it’s her most ambitious project and I hope it does take off really well. I hope he keeps on improving.
LikeLike
durai
January 25, 2016
Dhanush would have got an Oscar by now, if he did work with the A-list directors of Hollywood with equally good scripts. – ha ha
LikeLike
Utkal
January 25, 2016
I was also rooting for Leo after seeing TheRevenant. But after seeing the other Oscar hopefuls , my vote goes to Michael Fassbender in Steve Jobs. He was amazing1
LikeLike
Rahul
January 26, 2016
Leo is somewhat like Sachin Tendulkar. It is not like he is GOAT or even the GO his generation, but he is the most loved. There is something endearing about him . Also we have seen him growing up.
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
January 26, 2016
Kay Kay, agree with you on Carnage. Enjoyed that movie and Waltz was very effective. He had a different role in ZERO Theorem. Not sure if anyone has heard of that.
LikeLike
Pady Srini
January 26, 2016
The Oscars is no more about performance in a single movie. How much money have you generated in the BO matters !!! Sandra Bullock, Julia Roberts are prime examples. This year it seems to be about one dimensional actors and historical BO returns actors like Dicaprio and Stallone.
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
Raj Balakrishnan, have seen Zero theorem. I am a great Terry gilliam Fan and love to watch all his films. Now there is another director who never got an oscar nod simply because he is too much of an idiosyncratic and does not make the usual oscar package movies.
Has anybody seen the Richard Harris starrer ‘Man from the wilderness’ which is also a retelling of the Philip Glass story. I thought Harris was terrific in the film and added far more layers and nuances to character than Leo does in Revenant.
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
oh that would be hugh glass story , my bad!
LikeLike
brangan
January 26, 2016
MANK: Heh. And here I was, with visions of Richard Harris wolfing down bison liver as he composed minimalist music in frozen rivers 😀
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
Brangan, tears in my eyes and ROFLing man 🙂
andha Harris all saar ithu nadigan Harris
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
God, your comments must be marked NSW. All my colleagues are looking at me as if i have lost my marbles. you funny devil
LikeLike
venkatesh
January 26, 2016
hugh glass vs philip glass. it took me a while to get that.
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
Brangan, that turned out to be doubly funny for me man. you know. First i thought the joke was on Richard Harris, hence my first comment. but then it struck me about Philip Glass. Well you are the most vocal critic for getting rid of authorial intent for nothing. Its truly liberating and make things more interesting.
LikeLike
MANK
January 26, 2016
And this from your friend Sudhish Kamat. everybody has hitched themselves to the Leo Bandwagon
http://www.thehindu.com/thread/arts-culture-society/article8152202.ece
LikeLike
Utkal
January 26, 2016
MY REVIEW OF STEVE JOBS
Steve Jobs’ surprised me.
I hadn’t heard too many people talk about it. But there was no way I was going to miss it. It was written by Aoron Sarkin and directed by Danny Boyle. And Steve Jobs and Apple have been the entrepreneurial inspiration when we started our advertising agency – the ‘1984’ commercial for Macintosh being the creative benchmark one aspired to in one’s work.
So boy, was I surprised! What an energetic, inventive and engaging biopic Sorkin-Boyle combo has confected! ‘Social Network’ was refreshing in its approach. This took it a few steps further, thanks in no small measure due to two rivetting performances – Miachael Fassbender as Jobs and Kate Winslet as Joanna, his s near-constant companion, a marketing executive who describes herself at one point as Jobs’s “work wife.”
Read the rest at:http://utkaleidoscope.com/steve-jobs/
LikeLike
Prasad
January 27, 2016
@Utkal.
A big Thumps up from me for Steve Jobs. Even though the movie tanked due to various reasons, it’s commendable effort from Danny Boyle and Michael. What stood out the most was instead of showing a run of the mill biopic like “How did Steve Jobs changed the Tech World” the movie very crisply showed three important moments in his life just before the Iconic Product launches and brought out the human aspect of him effectively. Very sharp dialogues, crisp editing and a slick presentation as always from Danny Boyle. And to add to that Kate’s performance was a big bonus no wonder she got Golden Globe.
Full Credits to Aaron for a razor sharp screenplay and maybe he can expect a Oscar on top of the Golden Globe.
All,
Any thoughts on the Best Picture and Director? Lots of critics have voted for Spotlight and George Miller. Spotlight was very good movie on investigative journalism but somehow felt not in the league of “All the Presidents Men”. I was pleasantly surprised by “The Big Short” also. Excellent adaptation of ” Inside the Doomsday Machine ” and very entertaining.
The heavy (housing market) jargon in the movie like “Credit default Swap’ were explained in layman terms. The sequence of Anthony Bourdein with a example in the kitchen was very funny.
Lot of critics are predicting either it is going to be “George Miller” or “Tom McCarthy” for the Best Director …we just need to want and see.
LikeLike
Shalini
January 27, 2016
I hadn’t intended to comment on this post because I largely agreed with what BR wrote and saying “ditto” didn’t seem like a particularly value-add response, but I wonder if folks have been following the racism controversy that has engulfed this years’ Oscars? Beyond the obvious that diversity in participation enriches art, I don’t know how I feel about the questions of inequity that are being raised. Part of me thinks that our obsession with slotting everyone into winners vs. losers buckets exacerbates divisions within a society while another part feels that seeking and providing recognition for exemplary performance is a basic human need. Not sure how one fairly reconciles the two.
LikeLike
Utkal
January 27, 2016
Prasad: I found the ‘Spotight’ plodding and flat, without any intersting arc of narration. Maybe it is subject that is eliciting all this poraise. Not great as a film. ‘The Big Short’ is something else. Full of invention and creative inmagination. How the subjet of sub-prime crisis is made accessible and even hugely enjoayble is amazing. My vote for best picture. Miller is my man for best director . if not him then, Adam Mckay for The Big Short.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
January 27, 2016
Shalini, i have been religiously following the racism controversy since it started with #oscarssowhite. each day someone or the other has been speaking out. Spike Lee (but of course), michael caine, charlotte Rampling,…. .
i dont think blaming the academy is any solution, nor is the sweeping changes announces by the Academy president to bring in more diversity. The change should start from the head of the foodchain so to speak. Honestly where were the actors or movies of color this year that deserved the nods. Discounting the fact that Oscars hardly seems to recognize true merit, but still
A lot of it seems to be politically motivated- being the elections due in the US and all that. But i understand where it is coming from. Its not exactly about winning or losing. the oscars seem to be more a status symbol. so it is more of a desire to be included in that club more than anything that drives the controversy
LikeLike
MANK
January 27, 2016
Prasad, if it was up to me, i would give the best picture and director to Mad Max and George Miller. That was pure cinema at its best. Very few, full blown Cinematic action pictures have ever won the best picture. May be There was just the odd French connection or so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Prasad
January 28, 2016
@ Utkal and Mank.Thanks for your comments.
It’ll be Interesting to see the best Picture winner for this year as the race IMO is not so close like last year. (Birdman Vs Boyhood and Whiplash and The Grand Budapest.)
LikeLike
Vivek Gupta
February 1, 2016
I felt that the article was too cynical. You may not have intended it but one comes away with an impression that you are dissing the entire method school of acting as being shallow. The method artists have their own way of doing things. It works for them and it has shown spectacular results. De Niro’s performances in Raging Bull, Godfather are for the ages. Daniel Day Lewis is out of this world in everything he does. Leo may not be as talented an actor as those two in the sense that he doesn’t seem natural when doing heavy roles but one does come away with a feel of the effort he has put into it. The strain is visible even if the performance doesn’t feel great. May be he is doing it for an Oscar (cynical view which you seem to be implying) or may be he wants to challenge himself or may be that is the only way he knows. Nobody knows except Leo and really as an audience how does it really matter. I like all his performances regardless of why he does that. Does he make great films most of the time? Yes he does. Rest is irrelevant.
LikeLike
Vivek Gupta
February 1, 2016
Mad Max is a pretty good action movie but not enough beef to deserve an Oscar for Best Picture IMO. Narrative arc is thin, there is not much characterization, and the ending is a let down.
LikeLike
An Jo
February 1, 2016
Here’s what I feel about the movie generally and Leo’s performance particularly
Coming to the ‘acting’ credentials, DiCaprio has been facing quite some flak for – at least in the Indian press and amongst the Indian critics of ‘repute’ – his performance of Glass; since according to them, his performance is nothing but a classic syndrome of ‘suffering-for-art’ [remember Bale from ‘The Machinist’?]. That there is not actually any ‘felt’ performance but just the rigmarole of physical suffering. I am not saying they are entirely wrong but I do beg to differ. Leo is very good in conveying a ‘progressive’ graph as the character demands; from voice-modulation to the physicality. After being mauled by the bear, till the very end, he maintains the weakness and ‘hoarseness’ in his voice. His shouts and bellows are but whimpers in the overall aural world that he is a part of. One of the conundrums of a role that is so physically outward and demanding is that the emotional registers are pushed into the back-ground.
http://www.bollybrit.com/reviews-blog/film-review-the-revenant
LikeLike
An Jo
February 2, 2016
Talking of suffering-for-art; where does this one fit in?
http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/aamir-khans-dangal-cast-gets-a-special-cook/
Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan, who had created tremendous buzz by gaining 25kgs intially for his character in Dangal, is now in the process of shedding the same amount of weight in 25 weeks. And to achieve this, a special cook has been appointed on the sets of his upcoming film.
Aamir, who plays Mahavir Phogat, will be seen playing different ages of his character. Aamir has finished shooting as the 55-year-old and to shoot the other portions of the film, he is required to look much younger.
The physical transformation for his role of a wrestler in the film requires Aamir to maintain a particular diet. For that, Aamir and his onscreen wrestler daughters are given specially cooked food as per their individual requirements.
The actor also follows an intense one-hour workout session in the morning and is following a strict regime to lose weight.
Dangal, produced by Disney and Aamir Khan Productions is scheduled to release on December 23.
LikeLiked by 1 person
NeDhaPa
February 2, 2016
An Jo, you can now lie with legends, with that awesome-awesome review of yours. Critic world has a gem in you, a shining one (not a rough one).
On gaining and losing weight, Shabana Azmi comes to mind. I think in hindi movie industry, she is the one who has done most gaining/losing in last 30 year, imo.
On suffering for parts, what comes to mind is is Johnny Depp’s interview, I had read when PoC came. He apparently locked himself in refriegerator. When he emerged out from that frozen coldness, he could barely walk and ‘that’ walk is the walk you see in the movie. So yhea. If one is not a drinker and one need to develop pirate like character/ characteristics, one needs to “suffer” for the art. As a member of the audience, that is least I expect from my actors who are paid in millions/crores. Strap yourself to the aeroplane (Mr Cruise), lock yourself in fridge, eat some bison or other liver… do something… please come prepared and entertain me for all of my $12 I am paying ya.
:=)
P.S. I kinda understand where BR is coming from on his ‘criticism’ of streep etc. There is something in the eyes of the actor. No matter what, it reveals the soul of the actor. The deeply compassionate ones are the ones we connect. IT is the same with writers. No matter how good the writing is, if the soul of the writer is A-hole, we are not gonna admire or like or love the writing, however much we want. There is something (good) humanness that needs to come thru’ for us. Not sure if that is fair or not. But that is how it is.
LikeLike
An Jo
February 4, 2016
@NeDhaPa:
Thank you for your generosity!
‘Suffering’ depends on the role me thinks. I really don’t know how ELSE would Leo — or any other actor in his place — would have played Glass differently.
Coming to the reverse, Amitabh plays the role of a drunk as no other actor in this country [perhaps except Motilal, before him..but that was wayy back]. Would you believe he is teetotaler?
LikeLike
MANK
February 4, 2016
An Jo, i think Amitabh turned teetotaler only in the 80’s. he used to drink before that.
And speaking of Drunkards , how dare you forget Keshto mukherjee? 🙂
LikeLike
An Jo
February 4, 2016
@ MANK. Yes he did drink before. But as far as I know it was during his ‘partying’ days in Delhi and Kolkata. For ‘archivits’, this is a damn priceless article!!
[http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mR1qyfBqqCM/VJU1cPpUeEI/AAAAAAAAG0Y/zLKxQj7onFM/s1600/amitabh%2Bjaya%2Bsheila%2Bjones.jpg]
Keshto was damn good but restricted himself in playing the ‘comedic’ drunk. He wasn’t the one for pathos. Amitabh in Mili and a scene in Shakti remains the gold standard.
LikeLike
RT
February 5, 2016
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Keshto in a sober role.
About Leo and the bison liver, I don’t really understand the point of doing it that way. He could easily have used something else without affecting the scene. It’s not like Choi Min Sik in Oldboy or Nicolas Cage in Vampire’s Kiss where what they eat is the point of the scene.
LikeLike
Utkal
February 5, 2016
My review of ‘ The Big Short ‘
The year 2008. Our small, niche ad agency is barely into its first financial quarter, and our biggest and most loyal client of over two decades sent us a mail cancelling all the ads committed for the rest of the year. We said we had already made bookings. Never mind, we will pay the cancellation charges, was the reply. We didn’t know what hit us. We thought we have been through ups and downs and we will weather this one. We tightened our girdles and went about looking for new clients. Forget new clients, even our old clients in the IT sector started cutting down on their recruitment ads, which were our bread and butter those days. And so it went on for 3 years in the face of our indomitable optimism, forcing us to close the agency eventually in 2011.
We did not know it at first, but eventually we learnt that our misfortunes, and similar or worse misfortune of millions of others, were caused by the housing market crash in the USA. Now comes a brilliant film directed by Adam McKay based on the best-selling non-fiction book by Michael Lewis to help us make sense of what really happened.
http://utkaleidoscope.com/the-big-short/
LikeLike
NeDhaPa
February 6, 2016
on suffering for a role, here is how Randeep Hooda looks now (playing sarabjit). I would say hats off to R.H because how much sarabjit suffered. Poor Soul.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/First-look-Randeep-Hoodas-shocking-transformation-for-Sarabjit-Singh-biopic/articleshow/50862241.cms
LikeLike
brangan
February 6, 2016
NeDhaPa: On suffering for a role, I don’t mean this De Niro kind of thing (or enduring hours of makeup) where you want to look different physically. If that’s what you (or your director) feels you need to do, then hey… what can one say?
Though even in this case, I often feel that this EFFORT gets recognised more than the performance itself.
If you’re saying “Oh, what a performance. Plus, he lost all that weight too…” then that’s a good thing. If you’re saying “Oh he lost weight. It’s a great performance,” then no. I mean, one does not automatically translate into another.
What I’m referring to by suffering is this “Oh I ate real bison liver” kind of thing, where plain “acting” should be enough to convey that state even if what’s in your hand is bread pudding. This kind of “suffering” is, IMO, a pure hype thing, meant more for the PR machine than anything on screen.
LikeLike
NeDhaPa
February 6, 2016
BRji, thanks for responding to lowly writing of mine. Don’t disagree with anything you are saying here (agree with everything you said). Added points: how can I ever accept a pot-bellied Lord Shiva? Similarly, how can I accept a fatty/hatta-katta sarbjit. It is not justice to Lord Shiva or Sarbjit. They (the actors) then MUST lost weight and get into “character”. Losing weight in itself is not acting. That we all know naa.
On other stuff such as eating B-Liver:
Eating bison liver: Whatever works man. I mean, if actor is great enough to convey eating bison liver (while eating bread pudding) mera/audience kaa kya jata hai. But there are people out there (actors) who have never known, what it would be like to eat it and what one feels to do so to just survive and in order to get right nuances, may want to at least observe someone eat it or eat it themselves, so they can copy those expressions. Again, as audience, mera kya jata hai. Acchi acting karte raho. Bus. Just don’t go “Yummy…bison liver…yay…” i.e something inappropriate for those moments. Dude you are paid millions of dollars. Please deliver and don’t be lazy.
Now bison liver may have irked you… but ALL good/gr8 actors do that for their craft. Proper research at least. e.g. I was reading/listening to Matt Damon on NPR, and he said how he went to cop/hung out with police… learnt the exact way the gun is taken out while confronting a criminal etc etc. The interviewer then asked “would it have mattered (to the audience)”. TO which he replied something like “no…not really. But if I had done it incorrectly, they would know… they would notice… that something is off”. AND I liked his reply because I still remember it. So it is not always in getting it right, it is also about NOT getting it incorrect. Bachchan maybe a gr8 actor to pull of drunkard role without every having a sip but there are lessor mortals (like Kesto Mukherji) who became real life drunkards in trying to get it right. THAT to me is suffering for art truely (poor keshto).
Bison Liver will pass out of your system; Johnny Depp locked himself in fridge to adopt a certain gait of a drunk pirate (not having been a drunk pirate in real life and not having any references of good, entertaining pirates-precedent b4 this role either) will get thawed/out of his system in due time; but things like the hunch and all the back injuries Manoj Bajpai got for a play (mind you not a movie) where he had to be on his fours (something like that… I vaguely remember now) for hours together… and the play must have lasted for few weeks or months. One hardly gets any money in a play. He had serious back issues after that and was out of commission for acting for a year or so (had to get physio etc). So that to me is true suffering.
P.S. I personally think that you are more offended because Leo talked about it?!? Ho sakta hai. But here in USA, when actors talk about their craft or how they arrived at their character, there is certain humility. It is not a vain, disgustful display. At least not serious actors like Leo. Now Paris Hilton might be different case all together. 😦
P.S.1: please love Leo as much as we all do here and forgive him and let him have his must deserved Oscar. Fingers and toes crossed.
LikeLike
Utkal
February 6, 2016
I dont think no one who is impressed by The Revenant and by Leo’s performance is talking : Hey Leo ate bison liver. It is really very supercial and gossioy to talk about Leo’s biosn liver eating. We do not even know if it is true; and we do not care. It is not as if during the scene a super comes on scren saying” Leo actually ate biosn liver during this scene.”. So unless we are gosiip columnists, why cant we just talk about how the performance looks on screen?
LikeLike
NeDhaPa
February 6, 2016
Oppsss… I just happened to read the previous messages and saw posting on keshto/amitabh/drinking scenes by others. my bad. Hadn’t seen those while making my last comment.
A certain ‘suffering’ for art is required to arrive at the character and actors are as insecure beings as any. Even an ace actor like Amitabh, even today, go thru’ uncertainty/insecurity while doing so.
If you read up on how insecure amjad khan (who was already a theater actor of repute) was for his first movie debut role in Sholay. He had slept on floor of sets; stopped showering; stopping changing clothes; and he was still unsure if he had arrived and prepared enough for being the dacait role that he was essaying. He wrote long letters filled with insecurity to his wife in bombay. And then there was a whole ‘remove amjad’ from this pivotal role on the sets (they said his voice was weak), so much so that even the writers approached the directors with that option (and Amjad later on never forgave those two writers).
So bottom line is, even after eating bison liver, the actors are still not sure if they are in the skin of the character or not.
It is just like a writer doing research for his characters/history for his novel. The more research, the better the outcome and more interesting the novel for the readers.
P.S. Brji, how come you find it easy to praise sunil shetty’s daughter in her debut performance (and praise her razor edge cheekbones of all things) but then are so very hard on Leo and Streep? I wonder why not have same ‘compassionate’ attitude towards those two 🙂
P.S1: I do understand that as critic you have to say something and therefore you go into peeling layers (for us) etc etc.
LikeLike
KayKay
February 10, 2016
MANK: Oh yeah, massive Stallone fan here.
“Even First Blood was more an Anti hero character rather than a straightforward action hero. it is his bitter rivalry with Schwarzenneger that derailed him and finally destroyed him.”
I prefer to think of the fact that Rocky and Rambo were both boon and bane for his career. He came to be identified with those characters so closely he could never reach the same levels of success outside of those roles. And note that both Rocky and Rambo were roles Stallone wrote and shaped to suit him, thereby increasing the identification factor. Rambo may have been spawned off a David Morrell novel, but Stallone re-wrote the character and ending of First Blood significantly.
Schwarzenegger on the other hand never had this issue with The Terminator, as even today, it’s regarded more as a James Cameron creation.
But Stallone’s biggest failing was refusing to work (Kamal-like) with some of the best directors of that era. Arnie was simply the better business man who availed himself to some of the best action movie directors of that time (James Cameron, John McTiernan, Paul Verhoeven, Walter Hill).
Some of his better movies just had bad luck and timing. Rambo 3 was slammed as anti-Soviet when it arrived in the thick of the Glassnost era and the thawing of the Cold War. Arnie, ever the shrewd businessman, chose to make the Russkie-friendly Red Heat instead (and slammed Stallone in interviews for outdated Cold War propaganda). But seen today, Rambo 3 still holds up as an impeccably crafted action movie while Red Heat is clumsy, embarrassing and features the 2 least appealing characters for a buddy cop movie. I actually liked Lock Up compared to the more successful but silly Tango & Cash and even found some redeeming aspects to the universally panned Rocky 5( as Paradise Alley should have taught Stallone, if he wasn’t in the ring himself, audiences were not interested). I even enjoyed Oscar although Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot was dreadful.
Stallone also had the unfortunate habit of following up bona fide hits and acclaimed movies with thoroughly mediocre ones. The twin hits of Cliffhanger and Demolition Man led to the uninspiring quartet of The Specialist, Judge Dredd, Assassins and Daylight. The critical acclaim of the excellent Cop Land was followed with an ill-advised remake of Get Carter and the F1 misfire Driven, and from there to the career-low of direct-to-video bombs like D-Tox and Avenging Angelo. Note that once again it took a Rocky and a Rambo movie to help him claw his way out of DVD Dungeon.
Once again, it’s a Rocky role that’s given him some new credibility.
Let’s hope he doesn’t blow it.
LikeLike
An Jo
February 16, 2016
LikeLike
An Jo
February 17, 2016
ROFLOL… thumbs down for posting a DGA REVENANT Q&A with Alejandro??!!… BR..time for your to come up with a scathing/satirical piece on the ‘cultural irrelevancy of thumbs pointing down toward the human genitalia..’
LikeLiked by 1 person
An Jo
February 23, 2016
At the age of 17, following his expulsion from school due to poor grades, he took up a job as a commercial sailor and travelled across the Atlantic to gain experience.
During this time, he read a lot and the existentialist views in writers like Herman Hesse and James Joyce’s works left a deep impact on his discerning mind.
After his stint on the sea, he enrolled in Mexico’s Iberoamaricana University to do a course in Communications while pursuing his passion for music as radio DJ.
Next, he studied theatre under Polish-Mexican director Ludvik Margule while dabbling in advertising. Did you know he’s directed commercials for brands like Coca Cola and BMW?
http://www.rediff.com/movies/report/why-you-need-to-know-this-man/20160222.htm
LikeLike
An Jo
February 29, 2016
All signs point to LEO and LEO gets the award!!!!
LikeLike
An Jo
February 29, 2016
Some random, drunken observations/rants?? on the OSCARS..
1) This is a good sign as well as not a good sign – MAD MAX gobbling up almost all technical awards; which strongly indicates that the Academy doesn’t consider MAD MAX as a movie deserving BEST PICTURE or CHARLIZE THERON for Best Actress..
2) The thing about Priyanka Chopra is — as I think it was Shalini who pointed this out — she surely comes across as a poseur: And she is — outside of the films she stars in. She is such a classic example of a cultural appropriator that one is stunned there still are ‘youth’ who are willing to give her a tiara for having ‘crossed’ over! She is a fine actress and there is no doubt about that. She is marvellous in films when she sheds her irritating instinct to ‘belong’ to the crowd.
3) And as I say this, I am shocked to see idiocy-personified Joe Biden at the Oscars!! And everyone giving him a standing ovation is such a classic symptom of Hollywood — a coagulation of arse-licking ‘liberals.’ Remember, this is the same fellow that famously graduated all Indians to 7-11s!!
4) While I terribly respect Ennio, it is painful to see that Ryuichi Sakamoto and Alva Noto have not even been nominated for soundtrack for THE REVENANT!! If there’s any department that deserves the Oscar, it is this one!! What are they smoking!! THE REVENANT is one of the most haunting, soul-stirring soundtracks one has heard after a long, long, time..
5) Glad for Innaritu; but as usual, the OSCARS betray any element of surprise or evolving intelligence — MAD MAX is NOT, hence, deserving of best directing OSCAR since it belongs to ‘genre’..
6) We are left with BEST ACTRESS, BEST MOVIE, and BEST ACTOR. I hope in at least one of the first 2 categories, MAD MAX wins..but going by the predictability, it hardly appears so…
[My bad, Theron is not even nominated in BEST ACTRESS category]
7) And the best picture for SPOTLIGHT just goes on to prove how political the Oscars are. Awards have been given for ‘THEMATIC’ rather than ‘CINEMATIC’ achievements. SPOTLIGHT!!?? [Just as the Best foreign film selected NO MAN’S LAND ‘topicality’ over Gowarikar’s superb cinematic and block-buster vision in LAGAAN]. It is painful to see MADMAX being only honored for technicality and NONE for the heart in the art..
LikeLike