A middling contender for the festival’s top prize makes you wonder if quality is the only criterion.
You can understand why some films of iffy quality find a place at a festival. Like the Coen Brothers’ Hail, Caesar!, which I missed due to a late flight into Berlin. But everyone said it was nothing special – at least, nothing special enough to open such a major international event. But not every film can be about pushing the boundaries of cinematic art, like Lav Diaz’s 8-hour-2 minute-drama, A Lullaby to the Sorrowful Mystery. A festival needs stars and glamour too, which is why big, splashy Hollywood releases with big, splashy names have to be accommodated. (Gone are the days when arthouse greats like Bergman, Godard and Fellini were enough to qualify as big, splashy names.) But what explains the inclusion – in competition, which means it’s a contender for the festival’s top prize, the Golden Bear – of the Arabic drama Inhebbek Hedi, directed by Mohamed Ben Attia?
This is the story of a young Tunisian named Hedi (Majd Mastoura), who works as a sales agent for Peugeot. The first scene shows him stuck in traffic, knotting his tie in his car (translation: he’s suffocating), as a single piano key is struck repeatedly on the soundtrack (translation: something ominous is about to happen). It isn’t a good sign when we begin with clichés – and they keep piling up. Hedi is entering into an arranged marriage with Khedija (Omnia Ben Ghali), who’s so demure she’ll only meet him in his car, and even after three years of knowing him, she shrinks back when he attempts to kiss her. Is it any surprise that he’s drawn to the free-spirited Rym (Rym Ben Messaoud), who entertains tourists with Hawaiian dances and has a tattoo and wears off-shoulder dresses accessorized with a very visible bra strap? To make things clearer, Rym, unlike Khedija, lives by the sea – she’s locked in neither by land, nor by the customs and traditions of the land.
There are hints that Inhebbek Hedi isn’t just a love triangle, that something larger is at play. The country is in a crisis. Sales are decreasing. (Hedi’s boss won’t give him time off for the wedding.) Rym wants to move to France. Hedi’s brother Ahmed (Hakim Boumsaoudi) is in France too, working as an engineer. But even there, life is tough for immigrants. The festival brochure tries to sell the film this way: “An ostensibly personal story broadens into a panorama of a society in upheaval, an allegory about breaking away from traditions. And a film about happiness and pain of freedom.” But all of this is utterly familiar to anyone who watches Hollywood films. Or even the recent Indian multiplex films, many of which are about people trapped between the opposing pulls of tradition and freedom.
At many points, I felt I was watching an Indian film. “He’ll always be my little boy,” coos Hedi’s mother. Later, when she learns he may not be marrying Khedija, she wails, “After all we have done for you…” There’s talk of dowry and the unwillingness to settle down someplace too far away from one’s parents, and Ahmed – the film’s most interesting character – is like many NRIs who cannot (or will not) return home and yet want to control what’s happening at home. He’s keen on the Hedi- Khedija wedding because he wants to get into business with her father. He finds Hedi a better job because he feels that will enable him to take better care of their mother, who expects Hedi to stay with her even after marriage. (As a concession, she has made modifications to the house, so he’ll have his own entrance.)
Hedi is a… nice film, and at times an affecting film, but is “nice” a criterion to compete for one of the world’s most prestigious film awards? With the racism row heating up, thanks to the Oscars, it’s impossible not to wonder if films like Hedi are selected simply so that the competition lineup has some diversity. Hedi, undoubtedly, is a window to another world, one where women wear head scarves and yet smoke cigarettes, where the sounds of ululating at rituals commingle with the sounds of premarital lovemaking. But can this alone be enough? Then again, without this diversity, I suppose festival organisers will throw themselves open to questions about racism, especially with the refugee crisis in Europe. Still, at the end, even if I didn’t feel my mind had expanded, I found that my heart had swelled a bit – for we’ve all been through some version of Hedi’s dilemma. As much as we want to break free, some ties are too strong. The opening image couldn’t be more appropriate.
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2016 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
bollyaddict
February 13, 2016
Welcome back to Berlin, Mr. Rangan! I’m surprised and glad, that you’re here for the second time. I also watched HEDI today and thought, it wasn’t bad. By the way: The opening film Hail, Caesar was shown out of competition, thus it’s not competing for the Golden Bear. I will mostly watch films of the Panorama Section – for me always more interesting than the competition. Today it was EL REY DEL ONCE from Argentine and the very amusing british WAR ON EVERYONE. (I don’t know which name will show up here, but I used to post here once in a while as bollyaddict and still follow your blog with enthusiasm)
LikeLike
lakshmi
February 13, 2016
Once again we get to read a post a day for the next few days. Yay! 🙂
Last year, I was hoping you’d write a travel piece upon your return and was disappointed to read this in your final write-up:
“Note to self: The next time you’re at one of these things, either come a couple of days early or plan to stay behind after the festival. Otherwise, the only sights you’ll see will be those on the screen.”
Can we expect one this time around?
LikeLike
brangan
February 13, 2016
bollyaddict: Hello to you too 🙂 And hope to run into you sometime. Do you attend the press screenings or the other shows?
lakshmi: Not likely, but given the writing addict that I am… 🙂
LikeLike
bollyaddict
February 13, 2016
I’m not a Journalist, just a Berliner, who has been following the Festival since early youth. That’s the good thing about the Berlinale, it is a so-called “Audience-Festival”. Unfortunately this year the battle to get tickets is still tougher – the online-tickets for the most populer films have gone just after 1 Minute. So, no press conferences or press screenings for me. But it would be fun to meet you, if you’re schedule would allow it …
LikeLike
chronophlogiston
February 14, 2016
This is in response to your comment – “At many points, I felt I was watching an Indian film”.
I had the same uncanny feeling when I watched A Separation recently. I suddenly realized how much of Persian “DNA” we have in North India, not just the looks but also the basic family structure and ways of interaction. Our cultures all the way across to West Asia are closer than they appear on the surface today. 🙂
LikeLike
sridharraman
February 14, 2016
Wow, @brangan, did you get to watch A Lullaby to the Sorrowful Mystery? His previous movie , Norte, the end of History, with a running time of 4 hours, was screened at last years’ BIFFES. Despite wanting to watch it very badly, a last minute office meeting ruined my schedule.
LikeLike
Vatsal Agarwal
March 29, 2016
Hello Mr. Rangan, Can you kindly suggest that how Indian viewers can watch Inhebbek Hedi? I am curious and eager to watch the movie as after 20 years any Tunisian movie has been selected at the Berlin film festival.
LikeLike
brangan
March 29, 2016
Vatsal Agarwal: The only option is probably hope that it comes to a film festival near you…
LikeLike
vatsal agarwal
March 29, 2016
Well in that case Sir, It is not going to happen anytime soon…..
Thank you for your response. 🙂
Its more or less not fair…. There should be a provision though for the general audience too for watching such movies.
LikeLike