Spoilers ahead…
The first few minutes of Sethupathi, directed by SU Arun Kumar, could be called Kollywood’s atonement for Visaranai. A lone cop swelters under the sun. He ducks into a tea stall for some water, a banana. But he hears a ministerial cavalcade approach and races out, the fruit hastily discarded so that the hand can be freed up for a salute. Another cop escorts a single woman home. Another cop gazes wistfully at the image in his rear-view mirror, that of a little girl bursting crackers. He, of course, is on duty. It gets worse. Soon, a cop is ambushed, set on fire. And this is when we discover how clever Sethupathi is, and how wrong we are to accept anything that’s dished out in the name of “masala,” muttering “you shouldn’t expect anything from these films” under our breath.
Every self-respecting masala movie centred on a cop has a rousing hero-introduction scene, and the ante is upped here with the admonition that Sethupathi (Vijay Sethupathi) is a “sariyaana psycho.” As if to affirm this, we cut Sethupathi in mid-snarl. We brace ourselves for the inevitable action scene, and… I’ll leave you to find out, but it was the sweetest surprise I’ve had at the movies this year. Sethupathi has genuine masala moments capable of making those of us who cannot wolf-whistle feel impotent (when you’re pent up with excitement, there’s no release quite like the wolf-whistle release) – the way Sethupathi, from a distance, dispatches the villains, or the way he wears a handkerchief mask, rides up to the man who’s making his life hell, and… I’ll leave you to find out. But in the midst of the expected hero-versus-villain showdowns, the film is as much a chronicle of a householder who can never forget that his is a very dangerous job.
Thus, the family. The wife (Remya Nambeesan) with the love handles he so loves. The little girl who scribbles on the walls with crayons. The son who hero-worships his father to a disturbing degree. Scenes involving laundry, homework, (my favourite moment) switching the stove to ‘sim’ before picking up a call, FaceTime chats (the names saved as “pondatti” and “purushan”) – we get a fully functional family, perhaps too much so. There are two indistinguishable songs strewn with awww moments, two instances of making up after a quarrel. I was mildly annoyed by the wife’s line when her mother asks her to pack her bags and leave. “Andha aalu ippa enna adichaan-na thirumbi vandhu enna konjuvaan. Adhukku naan inga irukkanum.” Sounded to me an awful lot like adikkira kai dhaan anaikkum – though we do get the scene where the man apologises by touching the woman’s feet. Anyway, it’s all a blur of cuteness, like stumbling upon a panda village. I wish these stretches had been sharper, more distinct. Maybe a scene or two where he yelled at his mother-in-law, showed her his “sariyaana psycho” face. We are told, after all, that there’s some trouble in that relationship.
But Sethupathi’s affection for his family isn’t just a relief from the action scenes. It informs him as an individual, and when he shoots a school-going kid, you can see what it means to him – that could have been his son. He hauls up a man who, in the presence of a daughter, claims his wife has run away – that little girl could be his daughter. His eyes fill with tears when he thinks of that burnt cop – that could have been him. Sethupathi brings his home to his office, his office to his home, and in scenes like these, we wish for a better actor, a more charismatic star. Vijay Sethupathi is good with the swagger and he rocks that moustache, but his default performance level still says “I am stoned.” He’s best in the comic scenes. A fight in a vegetable market is very funny, as is the exasperated chairman of an enquiry commission.
The film gets serious with the arrival of Vaathiyar (Vela Ramamurthy). He’s one of those villains we find in the Madurai movies. He runs the city, and he’s got an inexhaustible supply of henchmen whose bones the hero can break. I found Vaathiyar’s headstrong daughter more interesting. She’s Sornakka-lite, and she gets the film’s most chilling moment when she’s told her husband is dead – she casually wipes her forehead clean, as if wiping off sweat. The film’s last half-hour is enormous fun, driven by the irresistible Naan yaaru (composed by Nivas K Prasanna, sung by Anirudh). I kept wishing I was the kind of person who’d have this as his ringtone. The song appears twice, first as background to the villain’s ascendancy, and then to underline the hero’s return to the top. When the right dose of masala combines with the right kind of music, it’s something else.
KEY:
- Visaranai = see here
- sariyaana psycho = Grade-A psycho
- “pondatti” and “purushan” = wifey / hubby.
- Andha aalu ippa enna adichaan-na thirumbi vandhu enna konjuvaan. Adhukku naan inga irukkanum = My husband may beat me now, but he’ll also make up with me later. And I need to be around for that.
- adikkira kai dhaan anaikkum = the hand that strikes is the hand that embraces; a really crappy proverb
- Sornakka = see here
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Karthik
March 3, 2016
I really liked the scene towards the end involving the henchmen and the hero’s family. One of the genuinely surprising masala moments in tamizh cinema lately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chanakya
March 3, 2016
‘…like stumbling upon a panda village.’
Man! How do you come up with such phrases? It is cute and funny as hell. You’re the best. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
moi
March 3, 2016
Hi,
It kind of hurt when you said he looks stoned.
I recently discovered Vijay Sethupathi…. He is my very first Tamil hero crush. He has one of the most striking faces I have ever seen… so full of character and gravitas and mystery . Looks like a face that has seen and experienced life. I can’t take my eyes off him when he is on screen. Kind of reminds me of Ajith.. not the most conventional looking face and very careless about maintaining their body…. but what great screen presence!!
Maybe I don’t watch too many movies… and don’t know how good others are… but I thought Vijay did a decent job in whatever I have watched him in. But it could also be because I am a girl and cant get over as to how attractive he looks. And from his interviews, he comes across as someone very self aware and not over the top.
Not in a million years I would have believed if someone told me that I would crush over a middle aged dark complexioned man (not being obnoxious about color here, just stating my taste ) with a paunch and a face half covered with thick beard..
Maybe because he is such a welcome relief from all those baby faced Bollywood heroes just out of college with their gym manufactured six packs..
I came here looking to see what you thought of Vijay Sethupathi and was kind of let down that u don’t share my excitement about him!!
Sorry for all the gushing…but I am still in the initial stages of my crush…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Siva
March 3, 2016
Nice review BR. Sethupathi was the most beautifully ‘TONED DOWN’ masala entertainer I have seen in recent times. All the scenes involving VJS and his SIs in the police station and during his interogations were a riot. Well done team. Good versatality shown by VJ Sethupathi in his roles. One of the most beautiful an surpricing intro scenes I have seen for a mass movie.
LikeLike
Siva
March 3, 2016
Would like to add that I am a huge fan of BR’s writing. I happen to be his college Junior too. Was waiting for his review on Sethupathi actually. Understandably delaed due to German film fest I guess. Usually read his reviews and decide to go for a film. For the first time I saw a film, was impressed and then was interested to see what BR wrote about it. Pretty much matched with what I thought. Though I felt VJs had portrayed the Cop and family man’s role as subtly and as convincingly as possible. Perfect fit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rahini David
March 3, 2016
moi: I completely agree with everything you said here except that “not in a million years” part. What with my aversion towards baby-faced adults (especially the male kind) I kind of expect to be attracted to the Vijay Sethupathi type of men. What I like about his face is that he can be a coward in Pizza, clueless in NKPK, crazy in Soodhu Kavvum et al and pull it all off.
He is 38 and rather than ward of the age, he looks and acts his age in Sethupathi. Let me say I have huge respect for those who do.
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
abby
March 3, 2016
I had never seen a viyay sethupathy movie before. I went to this one just to check out what he is like and I was blown away by his screen presence. I thought it was the best ever cop performance in kollywood after Sivaji Ganesan..
What I liked was he could show ‘the gethu’ of an hnest cop without holding himself bolt upright and walking like he had ants in the boots. Viyay Sethupathy was totally relaxed in this role. Rajni in moonru mugam was a caricature as was Satyaraj in ‘Walter’ and kamal in cop roles was always too feminine for my taste. Less said about Viyay and Ajith as actors, the better. Vikram was the only one who comes close, but, on the evidence of this movie, Vijay Sethupathy is a better actur.
I think Rangan is having another :’Kadal’ moment here, trying to be different just for the heck of it
LikeLike
Kid
March 3, 2016
BR: I haven’t seen the film, but I have a doubt here. The (sub)title of your post reads “A ‘routine’ cop movie elevated by awesome masala moments”, but when I read your review I never got the impression that YOU thought that this film is a “routine cop movie”. Especially from parts of your 3rd and especially the 4th para, I thought you meant to say that this is a “non-routine cop movie about a cop’s ‘routine lifestyle/work’ punctuated with some awesome masala flourishes and a few routine moments of silliness which is par for course as far as contemporary commercial Tamil cinema is concerned.” Because even leaving aside the masala moments which you hint about, the way you describe the proceedings here, even the some of the other bits (the family life, the day-to-day life of the policemen) in the film seems very different (or atleast given a different cinematic treatment) than an average Indian mainstream cop film. Also I felt that you liked the film (far) more than what is apparent from the title of the post.
LikeLike
brangan
March 3, 2016
Kid: I meant that the nature or template is routine, but that ‘sameness” is negated by a lot of nice masala moments.
LikeLike
Kid
March 3, 2016
BR: Ah, thanks for clarifying, now it makes sense though I still think that the title of the review isn’t in correspondence with the rest of the post. Also is that “sameness” (in template, setting etc) negated only by the “nice masala moments” or is it being negated “also” by the treatment of the very template here (apart from the masala moments, what I mean is how the routine life of the cop is handled etc, the way the director brings about a “small’ degree of freshness in depicting the family etc etc)?! Apologies if I am nitpicking.
Which reminds me that modern Hindi and Tamil cinema haven’t had too many examples of films centred around non-masala cops (of course Malayalam cinema has had Action Hero Biju this very year where the “action hero” bit in the title is completely misleading). Khakee was a Masala film, but the Masala here was more Zanjeer and less Saamy! But other than Kurukshetra, Gangajal, Ab Tak Chappan (though the latter has its own masala flourishes which are beautifully disguised by Shimit Amin). But other than that there has hardly been anything. Even something like Mardaani became more like masala like as the film progressed (though compared to something like Singham, it seemed like Ardha Satya!). In contemporary Tamil cinema I can’t even think of something like Mardaani.
LikeLike
Kid
March 3, 2016
BR: Also said this on the other post as well (not sure if you saw this) so re-posting it here-
“Also BR, I chanced upon your fine interview of Dasgupta (actually the best interview of his I have ever come across even though I wish it was longer.. that Sohrab Modi bit was truly eye-opening. Incidentally so was Govind Nihalani mentioning Sant Tukaram as one of his influences). I don’t think there is another Indian filmmaker in India other than Dasgupta who has consistently employed “ellipses” in his narrative right from his first film (Neem Annapurna here is one notable aberration because this is in the more Benegal/Mrinal Sen). It isn’t as if Dasgupta doesn’t have a proper narrative in his films, just that he doesn’t follow the rules of “narrativity” I know you had a line or two on the new Dasgupta film (Anwar ka Ajab Kissa), but I wish you could expand your thoughts as and when you get a chance especially since the film isn’t going to find a theatrical release anytime soon and so you might never get a chance to write about. Incidentally while Dasgupta and Rathnam both operate in completely different cinematic spheres, I think the last time an Indian filmmaker used this kind of an elliptical narrative other than Dasgupta was Rathnam in Raavan.”
LikeLike
moi
March 3, 2016
I know that this is a serious blog where serious stuff is discussed about films… so I thought I wouldn’t go into too much of a fan girl mode and annoy BR. But since I found a fellow netizen who shares my GOOD taste in men… lemme gush a little bit more :p
Rahini…. yes …. he has such a versatile face that helps him pull off all those characters. And how cool that he doesn’t try to cover up his age.. that comes across in his interviews too… that no nonsense..unaffected… nonchalant attitude..
I kind of ship him also for the fact that he is where he is today without any filmy family connections and that he had the guts to leave a well paying job to pursue acting (I am sure his wife didn’t share my sentiments about it at the time).
Also how nice it is to see someone give an interview in his mother tongue with so much confidence without trying to slip into English words in between… bloody hard for us non Tamil speakers..but kudos to him….
This cool factor and likability about him comes across in his movie trailers too … which is where I saw him first… in the rowdy thaan trailer. What an inspired casting that was.. cast opposite an equally attractive nayantara…. but so different from him in terms of her attractiveness.. But how nice they looked together… him all burly and brawny…and she all petite and feminine……It is so true what they say about media influencing your aesthetics!! I have a newfound appreciation for couples who look so different from each other in real life too 🙂
After rowdy, I watched some of his earlier films too(only some not all) where he has played your everyday regular guy….but he stands out even in all those ensemble cast movies he did. He has such an interesting cinematic face… that its high time someone cast him in a movie and give him some dramatic bgm’s every time he comes on screen. I guess that is enough sethupathi for today… back to real life…
And I love his voice too.. all raspy and hoarse like he is having an asthma attack or cold…. but very sexy!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
March 3, 2016
moi: I am not easily annoyed, unfortunately as others are beginning to find out to their frustration — so don’t worry about that. It’s lovely to hear about a perspective that’s not often heard. And yes, fandom is NOT to be underestimated 🙂
But that said: that no nonsense..unaffected… nonchalant attitude..
To me, this makes most of his characters look and feel the time. Most times, I wish he’d make more of an effort. There’s a thin line between laid-back and “not trying” and too often he comes across as the latter to me.
LikeLike
Amit Joki
March 3, 2016
BR: Just wait for the day when I comment about my crushes on Samantha, Madonna Sebastien, Keerthy Suresh,(insert good looking heroines who’ve romanced Dhanush) and then I’d love to hear you say, “It’s lovely to hear about a perspective” 😀 It’s all about the perspective indeed, I guess.
moi: You’ve got a great taste, I must admit! Almost all girls fall for that Surya guy or as you say, those baby faced heroes with packs where not! ugh
I’ve got a great man crush on Dhanush! Okay, crush might not be the word when LGBT rights and the related laws are being discussed at length, but I don’t get to talk about him as freely as you do 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sudhi
March 4, 2016
Sethupathi is one of the surprisingly few movies that can be watched with whole family in theatres and if missed will have to regret later. This is the first time I watched a vijay sethupathi movie in theatre and I was thrilled. There is no single boring moment in the movie. The most attractive quality of vijay sethupathi is not only his extraordinary acting skills but also his moist eyes, captivating smile and unique enchanting voice. An actor who can speak through his eyes is very rare. Looking forward to watch many more of his movies..
LikeLike
MANK
March 5, 2016
Brangan, what just 15 comments. I expected at least 100 comments by the time I got here. We had the best masala cop film in years and not many are talking about it. No wonder people complain- these days -that all the problems exist on this blog because we discuss movies less and everything else more around here 🙂
To echo your sentiments here brangan I loved it and loved the masala moments even more. I loved the characterisation of sethupathi here. How he create a familial atmosphere at the station – I loved the way he keeps referring to it as ‘my station’ – and treats his home as a battlefront- all the mock fighting with the children and wife. The best thing is that it’s not just there for a change. All this adds to the plot especially in the whistleworthy climax scenes – the scenes with vijay on the phone and the family on the other end is one of the best mass masala scenes I have seen in recent times and VS is really superb in the scene- you believe that the kid is capable of doing it
I agree with you about your problems with VS. He is a very good actor, but I have problems with him as a charismatic mass star. Apart from the above mentioned scene, there are very few scenes that he elevates with his screen presence. I was thinking Vikram all the way through. Why vikram chooses quixotic ventures like I and 10 enradharkulla. He would have perfectly suited this character and knocked it out of the park
LikeLiked by 2 people
praneshp
March 5, 2016
Damn it, I hate it when you go to film festivals. Sethupathi isn’t running in theaters here anymore.
LikeLike
Hermoine Granger
March 7, 2016
Spoiler alert: Regarding his son’s hero-worship, did anyone find it bothersome that Sethupathi trained his son, not his wife, to pick up the gun? Would it not make more sense to calm the adult in the situation and tell her the idea, instead of leaving her clueless and asking her to act as if he was home?
Maybe I missed something before about her character, but this part stuck out sorely for me…
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
March 7, 2016
Hermoine Granger: I agree. I’m usually not bothered by the chauvinism in Tamil cinema — in the sense that a few directors apart (Mani Ratnam, Gautham Menon etc.) it is only to be expected. But I felt let down by the wife character here (see the para in review about the part where she’s slapped).
The other thing that troubled me was the implication of a child picking up a gun.
None of this came in the way of the visceral thrill the moments provided, but these points did rankle after I came back home and thought about the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
S.P
March 7, 2016
Just watched the movie. The most annoying moment is when he asks his kid to use the gun instead of his wife. Implicating a 10 year old kid ( if male) is stronger than a fully functional kundati wife. That scene annoyed the heck out of me.
LikeLike
nellaimeenakshi
March 7, 2016
Hermoine Granger: I am so glad that I am not the only one that found the scenes involving the child and the gun and the wife slapping dreadful. In fact it marred my enjoyment of the movie.
Like Moi, I too have a major crush on Sethupathi but did not expect him to endorse this kind of male chauvinism. Expected this from all other mass heroes but definitely not by VS.
Kind of a let down that spoilt the otherwise nice movie for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
S.P
March 8, 2016
BR why do you think most directors (other than Mani Ratnam , Gautham Menon etc) still have sexiest and chauvinistic scenes? does it have mass appeal or is it because tamil audience has not evolved?
LikeLike
moi
March 8, 2016
OMG.. The B Rangan has taken out time to read my gibberish… call it perspective and actually replied in not 1 but 7 lines with a smiley..
This has to b the highlight of my virtual life. I am gonna bookmark this page and show it to my future kids…grand kids…et al.
This is my first ever interaction with a celebrity ever.
THankyou so much 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sai
March 11, 2016
I think that a movie should reflect the society we live in and the wife slapping scene or the kid lifting the gun scene did not disturb me one bit. Look around you folks. That’s the India we live in.
LikeLike
Raj
March 18, 2016
The character of Sethupathi was consistent throughout the movie except in one scene which happens to be the most critical scene (for the plot). An office who sees himself, his daughter (when a husband complaining about his wife in front of his daughter) in others uses a Gun to bring about the truth from a school kid. To me it was a complete contrast of the his character that was established till then.. Though he repents his action, the way the scene was played gives you an impression that the Gun technique is his regular way of interrogation. Though am a big fan of VS i thought in this this movie he did not bring out the psycho nature very well and the macho nature of the cop looked very forced!!!
LikeLike
sachita
March 27, 2016
Just caught this movie, glad few comments here have pointed the chauvinism in that scene and also of making a kid handle a gun than a adult woman. And the adikara kai thaan anaikum scene to a lesser extent. Even through out the way he handled her.
So many tamil movies easily put me off due to scenes like this. Impossible to take/relate too as well.
Someone mentioned about how movies reflect the society. I am sure there are very less uncorrupt ones like sethupathi compared to the number of women who can handle a gun. For godsakes, there are quite a few women cops in India.
The movie cannot redeem itself.
LikeLike
brangan
March 28, 2016
This review reminded me of the chauvinism debate here, especially these lines:
“Rendu pombalainga dhaan vandhu kaapaathitte irukkaanga. Idhellaam enna kevalam.” 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rm
March 28, 2016
BR,
1) On the chauvinism, even I do not understand why we see it as a problem. He is not a misogynist, that’s very clear from the initial scene when a man comes to lodge a complaint about his missing wife. But he entrusts his son, with the gun. Even as he leaves the town on work, when his son comes asking him if he could join, he says he needs to stay back because the house needs a ‘ambala thuna ‘. He is ready to fall at his wife feet, but even if it is a private moment he twirls his moustache once before doing so.IMO, this chauvinism adds a tinge of realism to a character who also considers it’s a man’s duty to uphold order both inside and outside of the home.
2) I do not know if I missed it somewhere, but is there an answer somewhere as to how the gun was fired? The constable says he attempted to replace the dummy but was not successful. Towards the end, the school boy says in the interview that Sethupathi did not shoot, but it fired itself when it fell down. Sethupathi is convinced that was not the case and he was still holding the gun when the shot was fired.
3) Offtopic: Would you be considering doing a review of Batman Vs Superman? I am seeing some hilarious reviews out there…
LikeLike
brangan
March 28, 2016
Rm: Chauvinism not on Sethupathi’s part, but the filmmaker’s… is what’s being discussed here.
LikeLike
Rm
March 28, 2016
BR,
Thanks for responding. The discussion here is about the supposed chauvinistic tendencies of the filmmaker getting reflected in his work. But I still only see a chauvinistic tendency being written into a character and not being a reflection of the filmmaker himself. I derive my frame of references here from the likes of Vijay who advises women on how to dress and Rajinikanth who advises women on how to behave, even as he goes about categorizing women the same time (‘pombalaingalla moonu vaga’). IMO, what we see here does not conform to the general chauvinistic patterns of Tamil cinema :). Infact I could only see the filmmaker wants to make it conspicuous here that he treats the women ‘carefully’ – the police officer in the very first scene (“adukunnu pombalaiya roadla pottu adipiya”), the missing wife complaint (“pombalaiya kutham sollikittu”), and the lathi charge at all the men protesting at the police station leaving out the only woman unharmed.I did find it odd that Sethupathi asks his son instead to handle the gun . I kept thinking there would perhaps be an angle to this that would be revealed in the end (with the mystery behind who cloaked the gun and all that). But none came up.
LikeLike
brangan
March 28, 2016
RM: I agree this is nowhere as bad as the Rajini or Vijay films. But the way i see it, there’s still some implicit chauvinism in the fact that a cop would entrust his little son with a gun but not his wife. It’s almost like saying “I’ll respect you and even touch your feet if you want… you know, do all these playful little lovey-dovey things… but when push comes to shove, I think you’re pretty useless and even a kid — as long as it’s a male child — is more capable than you are.”
Note that I am not questioning the portrayal on screen. There are all kind of characters, and they do all kinds of things. So this particular cop behaved this way (teaching his son to shoot, not his wife). Sure. This particular wife did only housewifely things like cooking, cleaning, giving husband sex. Sure. The film isn’t making some message out of this. Sure.
Still, it bothered me a bit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raj
March 28, 2016
The way you discounted the work of Stay at home Mom as “This particular wife did only housewifely things like cooking, cleaning, giving husband sex. ” leaves me confused as to who is the chauvinist? I agree that this society is male chauvinist but to keep looking for the smallest of clues in movies to push the point and criticize it looks like the new norm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
moniker
March 29, 2016
I can totally see him asking his son to shoot. He knows his wife long and well enough to know that she doesn’t have it in her to pull the trigger. I didn’t think that the decision was based on her being a woman or just a wife… Just that he is a good policeman and a good judge of character.
And he knows that his son is clueless enough ,precocious enough, fearless and presumptuous enough to be easily manipulated to shoot a bunch of men without thinking of the consequences, unlike his wife who knows what these men can really do to her and to her kids especially if she does something to tick them off.
I was more surprised that they got scared and ran off after the kid fires one time. They looked like they could easily overpower the kid who I am sure can’t even aim the gun properly to shoot and hurt someone.
LikeLike
brangan
March 29, 2016
moniker: Yes, I agree that in this particular case — in this particular film — it does seem like something this particular character would do. As I said in some comment far above, while I watched the film this chauvinist issue did not strike me at all, because I was caught up in the thrill of the moment.
It’s only after returning home that this began to rankle — I guess not so much because of the lack of agency given to the wife as what was asked of the kid, which really troubled me when I began to think about it. Hence the discussion.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rahini David
March 29, 2016
I personally was able to buy this son character being more capable than the mother because the father is more likely to train him that way. Almost all parents do train their same sex child to be a little like them and thereby a police officer may train his 10 year old to hold a gun and pull the trigger. Even people who are very close to their spouses do not often do this. He would if he thinks it is likely that these dangerous situations are likely to happen. But here I see that he was only training his son to use to very later in life and it got more useful than he might have thought.
I do not rate modern humans by their ability to hold the gun anyway. If someone is only good at being a housewife, what is the harm in saying she is only good at being a housewife(ok, homemaker)? It is more realistic than every other untrained woman being an expert at handling the gun and swords and dynamite. I cannot shoot, I can never stab a person whether in hot blood or cold. I cannot even light firecrackers. To say “Rahini is not brave enough to light firecrackers” is no insult. It is a statement of fact. This does not make me a lesser person. It may be a disadvantage in certain circumstances, that is all. It is not that women should not have traditionally feminine fragilities in today’s movies. It did not have “Only a woman” or “Now do you know who is the boss” or “Now you know your place” type of dialogue. It seems good enough for me.
I absolutely hated that cutesy falling at wife’s feet scene. That is the most misogynistic part of the movie(IMO). I will vent about it a little later.
LikeLike
blurb
April 20, 2016
I don’t recall the wife having a name.
Did the daughter have a name? Vaathyar’s daughter?
But, hey, when you are someone’s daughter, or someone’s wife — that’s name enough, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person