Spoilers ahead…
Forget, for a moment, the fan on screen. Maneesh Sharma’s fourth film is, first and foremost, a tribute to fans of Shah Rukh Khan, the actor, the star, the middle-class-boy-to-millionaire myth. When I first heard about the film, I thought of Misery, The King of Comedy, The Fan, those other thrillers about the rich and the famous besieged by monomaniacal fans, but Fan is a uniquely Bollywood creation, a uniquely Shah Rukh Khan creation. It’s possibly easier to write a thesis around the movie and what it says about one of our biggest self-made stars than write a review about it. Watch Shah Rukh split his two sides – the overt crowd-pleaser with that high-pitched whinny of a voice, the grave actor who can vanish into a disgraced hockey coach – into the two roles of Gaurav Chandna (the fan) and Aryan Khanna (the star). Did you catch the star’s name, which is that of the real-life Shah Rukh’s son? There’s also a character named after his daughter. And doesn’t ‘Gaurav’ roll off the tongue the way ‘Gauri’ does? Thus, watch the conflation of on-screen and off-screen Shah Rukh. A scene that pits Gaurav against Aryan plays out in front of a splotchy mirror, which yields reflection after reflection of these boys from modest homes in Delhi – you could reflect on this single visual for days.
Watch Shah Rukh sportingly allude to the moolah he made (and probably still makes) from dancing at the weddings of the well-heeled. Watch a scene riff on Shah Rukh being detained by US authorities, who had little regard for his Shah Rukh-dom back home. Watch Shah Rukh playing his own… Duplicate. Watch Shah Rukh play Sunny Deol’s part in Darr, while the Shah Rukh part is played by… Shah Rukh. Watch Gaurav pretend to be Aryan and molest a woman, thus destroying Aryan/Shah Rukh’s reputation as someone who values women enough to put his heroines’ names before his own in his movies. Watch Shah Rukh play a mega-star threatened by the rise of younger stars in a Bollywood more conversant with English than Hindi. Watch Shah Rukh face his biggest fear – not Gaurav, but an empty auditorium. Watch Shah Rukh in a Yash Raj production that unfolds in foreign locations – but without a song in it, and without a heroine for him to romance. But wait. Consider Gaurav’s ring tone, which is one of Aryan/Shah Rukh’s most famous songs, Tujhe dekha to yeh jaana sanam. It’s a testament to a fan’s love for his star (in a sense, Shah Rukh is playing his own heroine here), and given that both roles are being enacted by the same actor, perhaps even a testament to self-love, the narcissism that’s such a part of being a big star. A star’s biggest fan is… the star himself.
The first half of Fan, however, belongs to the fan, and it goes to great lengths to show how utterly un-star-like he is. Two key scenes underscore the discrepancy between who Gaurav is inside his head (a special somebody) and who he really is (a nobody). When he impersonates his hero at a local competition, we keep cutting between close-ups and long shots – the former tell us who he thinks he is, while the latter tell us (by dwarfing him amidst his surroundings) otherwise. And later, when he stands outside Aryan’s home in Mumbai, waiting with thousands of equally frenzied fans for a glimpse of the star, we hear his voice in the close-ups, as though he’s the only one calling out to Aryan. But the long shots tell another story. Gaurav’s voice is lost in the din.
Elsewhere, in a small scuffle in the Internet centre Gaurav runs (yes, this isn’t the part of Delhi with laptops; it’s Maneesh Sharma’s Delhi, which is as ordinary as Gaurav is), he manages to overpower three bigger men. A girl he’s soft on – though not as soft as he is on Aryan – asks, “Akele hero banne ki kya zaroorat thi?” Translation: This isn’t a movie. Why endanger yourself? But in his head, his life is a movie, an Aryan Khanna movie. Again, the difference between who he thinks he is, who he is. After he sets out to meet Aryan Khanna, we get a bigger action sequence, one that’s almost movie-like, involving a lot of leaping around a dilapidated building. (The action stretches are fantastically shot, edited and choreographed.) But at the end, he is overpowered. Gaurav may have been a star in his corner of Delhi, but Mumbai puts him in his place. Not every Delhi boy with dreams is going to get a warm welcome from the city that manufactures them.
But these are all externalities. Apart from his Aryan-worship, who is Gaurav as a person? He’s neither a figure of sympathy nor empathy. He comes across like a mild creep, an impression that’s furthered by his uncanny-valley resemblance to Aryan. (I was reminded of the two Kangana Ranaut characters in Tanu Weds Manu Returns, who looked the same… yet different.) Gaurav is scrawnier. His nose is straighter. His teeth stick out. There’s a scene set in Madame Tussauds in London – Gaurav could be a waxwork in progress. He even gets a line to this effect, that God made him from the leftover clay after He made Aryan. He regards, as many fans undoubtedly do, Aryan as someone who owes him something. “Main hoon to tu hai.” But I found myself nodding more at Aryan’s retort: “Tum apni jagah, main apni jagah.” Put differently, we end up caring more about Aryan. We understand that he’s royalty, that he doesn’t have time for every besotted fan. And we feel for him when he understands finally, what his tossed-off platitudes can come to mean to fans like Gaurav. Early on, he keeps saying he is where he is because of his fans. But after being stalked by Gaurav, he pauses when the line comes to his mind unthinkingly, automatically. I’m guessing it’s another meta moment, a star forced to face the things he says to remain a star.
It’s a great idea, in theory, to imbue Aryan with such unheroic (and therefore, human) qualities and to make Gaurav more than just a simplistic, psychotic villain (we feel terrible for his parents) – and it sits well with the film’s constant juggling of identities. First, Gaurav is desperate to find Aryan; later, Aryan is desperate to find Gaurav. First, Gaurav plays Aryan on stage; later, Aryan plays Gaurav on stage. First, Gaurav falls at Aryan’s feet, like a devotee before God; later, in a metaphorical scene… Aryan remains in the heavens, like a God, as Gaurav falls to earth. But these complexities might have played out better had the film taken the understated route of Anurag Kashyap’s Murabba segment from Bombay Talkies, which was about another deluded fan setting out for Mumbai to meet another self-made star.
Fan, instead, turns into a preposterous thriller. And it doesn’t have the pace to make us swallow the ludicrous contrivances. Like the fact that a superstar feels the police in India are not going to protect him. Like the fact that Gaurav can transform, overnight, into a globe-trotting, Ethan Hunt-like master of disguises. Like the fact that no one seems to be able to tell that Gaurav looks like Aryan. Perhaps the point is that the film is itself as much of a double-role player as its protagonist – one half meek and mild-mannered character-driven drama, the other a comic-booky superhero saga, one half an ode to the Shah Rukh of Chak De! India, the other a nod to his Chennai Express-es and Dilwale-s. But it remains a conceit, and the director cannot pull it off. The two halves never cohere, though the two Shah Rukhs certainly do. This is one of the actor’s finest hours. He’s terrific as Gaurav, and he’s even better as Aryan, a man who has everything, and whose ego will not allow him to apologise to a man who wants nothing more than a “sorry.” Who’s to say how much of Aryan is Shah Rukh not acting but being? After all, who better to play a super-entitled one-percent-er than a super-entitled one-percent-er?
KEY:
- “Akele hero banne ki kya zaroorat thi?”= Why try to be a hero?
- Tanu Weds Manu Returns = see here
- “Main hoon to tu hai” = You exist because of me.
- “Tum apni jagah, main apni jagah.” = We live in different worlds.
- Bombay Talkies= see here
- Chak De! India = see here
- Chennai Express = see here
- Dilwales = see here
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Dracarys
April 16, 2016
As usual excellent review!
Feels like you were playing his earlier movies in your mind than watching this! That tells a lot about this movie!!!
From the trailer the movie looks like a rehashed DARR although a narcissistic one!!! Would have thought of watching it had it featured a real life lookalike/duplicate (thereby providing a real opportunity to that guy) rather than this ‘cross conjured between SRK and Shobaa De on an intolerant day’!
LikeLiked by 1 person
anurag1700
April 16, 2016
“The two halves never cohere, though the two Shah Rukhs certainly do” very well summed up in that one statement. Your review makes me feel this is like Tamasha. Like u titled it as ‘imperfect and messy’ it certainly was but well worth analysing so much that should be written and discussed about. Same way I felt about fan from your writeup. It is worth giving a watch just to undrstand n break down so much more than it appears it has.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 16, 2016
Wish the fan role was played by some other person, one of his real life lookalikes.
That would have given much more authenticity. And not going overboard with the antics of the fan. Just keeping it at realistic levels. And it should have been done when SRK was quite young and at his peak.
Aamir Khan’s Dhoom where he had done double role was much more appreciable but that film was criticised for the wrong reasons too harshly.
No doubt SRK is more media savvy and this helps him to get good reviews with few exceptions.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 16, 2016
I am reading that SRK has returned to form as if he is a cricketer. A true actor cannot go astray even in a bad movie.
LikeLike
वरुण (@varungrover)
April 16, 2016
Fantastic review yet again. There are some more references to SRK’s earlier films i caught.
The mandolin from DDLJ being smashed by his biggest fan. Subtext hi subtext.
The fall of Gaurav in the end reminded me of Shilpa Shetty’s character falling in BAAZIGAR. Both thrown off the parapet by a man (SRK) they thought they loved.
The blood soaked faces, with shirts half-torn, in the final encounter on the roof was a clear ode to the poster-image of DARR.
And absolutely agree, easier to write a thesis than write a review. And definitely more fun too.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Phani
April 16, 2016
Fantastic Review.
I always feel that SRK is one of the best actors. He is an actor who is kind of value-addition to movies, who takes movies to all together higher level with his performance in those films.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 16, 2016
If you can review Sunny Leone’s films, why not Jungle Book?
LikeLiked by 1 person
An Jo
April 16, 2016
One gold-standard take-away from this film is that SRK has just bared himself as a super-star in this movie. He lets you into what it means be SRK-the superstar: Not Amitabh the super-star; not Rajnikanth the super-star; not Salman, not Aamir, not Dilip Kumar. SRK the super-star doesn’t hesitate to dance at business-men’s daughter’s weddings. The business-man is rude and admonishes him that superstars like him take everything for granted. They come late; they think the world of themselves, blah, blah. “I am paying you a bomb. You better make it worth”, says the business-tycoon. Aryan simply takes in the insult and replies, ‘Of course you are the one who can pay the bomb! You won’t regret it.” He then goes about mechanically dancing and pleasing the wedding guests. This is what I meant by SRK – the superstar. He is just announcing: This is me; I dance at weddings for money. I am ‘sankhi.’ I use foul language. Deal with it.
LikeLike
Rishikesh
April 16, 2016
I felt that it was a special film despite its flaws. I think its the meta factor coupled with the accurate depiction obsessive fan boys that gives it the edge and elevates the material even when logical loopholes threaten to pull it down. the fall out between Sid Kapoor and Aryan Khanna…has Salman and Shahrukh written all over it… I ended up enjoying second half more ..they managed to conjure interesting scenarios where you resort to a lot of thinking between the lines..Gaurav all of a sudden showing up at Madam tussauds may be a weak point but that scene itself so interestingly (the people feel its Aryan mocking his own statue but its actually Gaurav taking revenge) that you tend to forgive the creative liberties…Felt the same about scene where Gaurav sneaks into Aryan’s house.where he also says that his house looks similar to Aryan’s. I wish to put forth the same question to you..Isnt it okay to overlook the logical flaws if the scenes itself are unique and interesting..?
LikeLike
Asmozonic
April 16, 2016
Minor corrections: it’s the UK Police and Gaurav sells his shop “at a good price”. He lands up in London “after a year” thus giving him some time to prepare/ plan his moves.
LikeLike
Pankaj Sachdeva
April 17, 2016
Splendid review, the film has so many layers. One of my favorite moments was when Gaurav is running from parapet to parapet, at one point, the wire that he holds on to is the one that comes out of a table fan in the room. What symbolism! And, of course, the shop he owns has photocopy written outside it, because he thinks he is a copy of Aryan.
LikeLike
brangan
April 17, 2016
Rishikesh: Isnt it okay to overlook the logical flaws if the scenes itself are unique and interesting..?
An interesting point. I too felt that the thriller mechanics kicked in pretty well at some points. But not enough to overcome the overall feel of preposterousness.
When a film is as low-key as this one is in the first half, it needs a certain something to make the audience believe that, yes, this can be the second half. It’s not enough to show how Gaurav got his money, or whether he had a year to “prepare,” as Asmozoic says. You can’t shove these things in the background and say, “Okay, this is the finished product.” You have to show us the transformation.
Even if the film had taken place in Delhi, we could have said, “Okay, local boy, home-town advantage. But to show Gaurav like a globe-trotting super-spy, who’s just everywhere at once, so easily — just too much to swallow.
And yes, I do get it that this may not be “logical,” that this may be a conceit we’re asked to buy, given the meta layers in the movie. But in that case, the film needs to do something to slip us into that conceit-y zone, like the Charlie Kaufman movies do. (They look “real,” and yet they exist in a bizarre la-la land.) I couldn’t buy it here.
Asmozonic: Yes, it’s the UK police, but I’m saying the scene might have been put in there as a nod to SRK’s detention in the US… Watch a scene riff on Shah Rukh being detained by US authorities…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apan
April 17, 2016
‘Watch Shah Rukh face his biggest fear – not Gaurav, but an empty auditorium.’
What a film it could have been, had they ensured that the pages from Dhoom 4’s script did not get mixed up with the script of this film.
LikeLike
Apan
April 17, 2016
Reblogged this on apansinghal and commented:
such brilliant observations, like always.
LikeLike
Rishikesh
April 17, 2016
Perhaps it is the underwhelming nature of the first half that got me all pumped up when the film took the thriller mode, But the first hour too had its share of bizzare happenings, like the scene in which Gaurav attacks Sid Kapoor. Sid Kapoor taking to twitter and openly lambasting a senior star like Aryan is also questionable. Anyway excited to see how it fares at B.O. And when was the last time you saw such earthiness in an SRK film…Paheli?.
LikeLike
An Jo
April 17, 2016
As mentioned in my review too, here’s another observation. Notice that in both KI & KA and FAN, you have a super-superstar & a superstar playing themselves: Amitabh & SRK.
It’s interesting how they have bared their stardom on the screen. They talk of that slice of their lives which have been under public scrutiny and judgments for quite a long time – and it is pretty bold of them to convey through ‘films’ what actually happened or happens. SRK has been judged as a ‘seller’ since he won’t hesitate to dance for money at some high-profile weddings. He smartly uses it in FAN to slyly tell the public to go fish themselves. He WILL continue to dance for money..whether the stage be a wedding mandap or the Wembley.
Amitabh’s exploration in KI & KA is even more unexpected and admirable. Primarily because he is a very reticent person when it comes to his personal and family life and guards it zealously. [SRK, time and again, has used the press to his advantage and is very media-savvy & his exploration of the pain-points in his stardom in this movie OR previously in bits and pieces in the media is at least tenable. Amitabh’s stardom is even more illustrious owing to the fact that he faced years of print-media absence but STILL came out on top in ALL those 10 years.] Through Balki, he has put forth his and Jaya’s position with regard to the accusation that he forced Jaya to be a stay-at-home-mom: which obviously is not the case but mainly a result of ‘societal’ construct of a home-maker: Amitabh would have obviously sucked at being a home-maker– [could he have ‘learnt’? That’s another matter for discussion]– as is made clear in the movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Asmozonic
April 18, 2016
@BR: Thanks for responding. I misunderstood the meaning of “riff”.
LikeLike
Arun Annamalai
April 18, 2016
Superb review, @brangan have seen so many business/tourist visas lower middle class travelers from the north that it is not difficult to buy Gaurav making these trips, heck i have heard confirmed stories of gas station attendants sneaking in through borders, it is no big deal. Well, the transformation yes, could have dwelved into it, maybe even a plastic surgery but then again i have seen people who met SRK live and swear that he looks a lot different from film, so it is easy to deceive people especially abroad than back home but with video cam recordings it is hard to believe the cops could not distinguish him, given that earlier the indian cops and even sid kapoor did not feel he was Aryan and no one mis-identified him as Aryan which is where i felt a plastic surgery with a minor glitch could have been even more convincing as part of his one year prep time before the Madame Taussad act.
But still it is a fresh plot from an indian bollywood movie perspective and could have been greater.
LikeLike
Utkal
April 19, 2016
“It’s possibly easier to write a thesis around the movie and what it says about one of our biggest self-made stars than write a review about it. ”
This has kind of kept me from watching the film so far.
LikeLike
Maxy
April 19, 2016
Rishikesh “Sid Kapoor taking to twitter and openly lambasting a senior star like Aryan is also questionable.”
Did you forget Vivek Oberoi’s press conference against a ‘senior’ Salman Khan within 2 years of his Bollywood entry? This scene is a nod to that one!
LikeLike
MANK
April 20, 2016
i didnt like the film Brangan, . it isnt very good. too much meta and too little of everything else. which is a shame really bcoz the basic idea is pretty good. it has some good concepts as you noted in your review – fan chasing star, then star chases fan, fan plays star on stage, then star plays the fan on stage. the character of gaurav didnt work for me . SRK is superb as Aaryan Khanna. it must be one of his best performance in the swades, chak de india mode. but i have mixed feelings about his Gaurav performance. basically it is an unevenly written character. it remained a caricature of all his obsessed loverboy persona from dewana ,darr, baazighar, Anjaam , it never felt like a living breathing character. all those heavy prosthetics makeup and photo shopped face didnt help either.may be another actor playing the role might have helped Maneesh sharma is way out of his league here with the thriller elements of the story. he does the part which he is good at. Establishing characters and melieu of the smal town life. the first hour or so is very good, but once Gaurav decides to take revenge on his idol, the film goes downhill from thereon.
You are right about the logical loopholes. if it is an exaggerated romantic fantasy like tamasha or an extravagant historical romantic fantasy like bajirao mastani, then we are ready to suspend disbelief and go along with the narrative, but when it is a thriller with much more real life characters , then its hard to swallow these logical loopholes. even if some of the incidents is not supposed to be taken literally, the filmmaking is so poor that you are taken out of the film narrative.
the basic concept of the film – a fan taking revenge on his idol after he is ungrateful to him for a good deed he has done – is borrowed from Tony scott’s The fan, where de niro keeps repeating ‘A simple thank you would have been enough’
The character of Gaurav – who does poor standup routines of his idol in funny clothes- must be based on de niro’s rupert pupkin in Scorsese’s King of comedy.but in that film you pretty much live inside the crackpot fan’s head. also the film is made in an exaggerated style keeping with character of the protagonist.
I believe that the film hasnt been doing very well. but i sincerely hope that SRK does not get disappointed with the BO result and go back to doing dilwales and chennai expresses. bcoz as Aryan khanna , he is top class and comes across so real, may be much too real for comfort. the guy who slaps a drunk upstart star for flirting with his wife, who is unapologetic about dancing at weddings of haughty abusive industrialists, whose primary concern is his children and their studies, SRK seems to be playing pretty much himself here. i loved his performance in the final confrontation with gaurav as he says – meri bhi bahut si zimmedariyan hai bhai, he brings out the human being inside the much revered star so beautifully. pity, that the film does not match up to his performance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utkal
April 21, 2016
FAN : A DISASTER OF EPIC PROPORTIONS
A few minutes into Gaurav Chandna and I had lost interest in the film never to be re-engaged again. Both the writer and Shahrukh as an actor have failed with Gaurav big time. We see Gaurav Chandna, the crazy fan of the superstar Aryan Khanna, mimic Aryan Khanna in the local colony function and win a trophy along with cash prize of Rs.20,000/. Fair enough. The problem is Shahrukh’s portrayal of Guarav is more like a mimicry rather than acting. He walks, talks and behaves like a cross between a psychopath and a mental retard. Unfortunately, the writers too invest the character with equal amount of superficiality and absurdity forgetting to create a credible human being. We get it that he is a crazy fan of Aryan Khanna and he wants to go and meet him in Mumbai. But going ticketless just because Aryan had gone ticketless on his first trip to Mumbai to become an actor? Is I worth taking the risk? He could have easily bough an unreserved ticket. His father could have asked, “Beta, how will you go all the way to Mumbai without a reserved berth? “ He could have replied, “But papa, do you know when Aryan Khanna went to Mumbai from Delhi he went WT. At least I have an unreserved ticket!” Then he could have some sort of adventure in the general compartment. The drama we see now with TTE in the film takes the film to an Over-The-Top territory from the word go. The result. We never buy in to the character of Gaurav. It only becomes worse as he starts interacting with his idol. Aryan Khanna’s action in getting Gaurav beaten up by the police this far? Just so that Gaurav can have a reason for seeking revenge and the film can have some kind of a plot line?
Things get even more preposterous after the interval when Guarav lands up at Madame Tussauds pretending to be Aryan Khanna. All logic or credibility of behaviour gets thrown to the winds. All tis while , either when he is at the gates of the star’s bungalow, or when the rival star meets Gaurav, or when Aryan Khanna meets his fan for the first time; no one remarks, ‘ Hey you look so much like Aryan himself! And he must be 25 while the star in his 40’s. Yet he has no problem in passing off as Aryan Khanna even for people looking at him from close quarters. He even talks sharp English like Aryan Khanna. And what about Aryan Khanna? What is he doing running across terraces, swinging from ropes, and vrooming on motorbikes, chasing Gaurav?
Read the rest at : http://utkaleidoscope.com/fan/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anonymous because I'm shy
April 22, 2016
Does this movie pass the Bechdel test?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anuj
April 23, 2016
Fan despite being a nostalgic trip for the SRK whom I admired during the Baazigar & Darr days is a thriller which is pulled down due to a lackluster second half and too many loopholes. Read my review on http://thesimplemoviereviewer.blogspot.in/2016/04/fan-movie-review-thriller-full-of.html
LikeLike
Anuj
April 23, 2016
“But going ticketless just because Aryan had gone ticketless on his first trip to Mumbai to become an actor? Is I worth taking the risk? ” ~ well, its a movie for god’s sake! A mediocre movie no doubt, but unfortunately like always, Mr. Utkal’s review is much worse than the movie’s mediocrity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utkal
April 23, 2016
Anuj: “well, its a movie for god’s sake! ” You mean, it’s a dumb movie for god’s sake, dont you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alaap
April 23, 2016
The ‘WT’ was an superb scene. Loved Very well acted. Even better” Here, keep the fare, but I will travel only WT.
Kudos to SRK for putting himself into the shoes of his fans and playing Gaurav realistically and not going full psycho.
Another moment I liked when Bhutiani thinks chides SRK just because he has paid him a bomb and how SRK although a little slighted deftly diffuses the situation , instead of maybe throwing the self respect word around and cancelling the show.
I suspect SRK’s hand in the script in these points. Whicj is why I strongly suspect SRK’s hand in that preposterous bike chase too. And , given the lukewarm reception it would appear many liked that ridiculous chase cos barring that and the Tussaud’s scene which jumped the gun , I loved the movie.
I find myself humming the mukhda portions of Tu mere saamne
LikeLiked by 3 people
Utkal
April 23, 2016
If Shahrukh had any sense, or at least any script sense, he should have opted to adapt Srijit Mukherjee’s ‘Autograph’ reprising Prasenjit’s role, instead of this confused mishmash called ‘ Fan’.
LikeLike
Anuj
April 25, 2016
Fan is indeed dumb in parts but still not as dumb as Dhoom 3 and The-Laash, excuse me-Talaash which our great intellectual reviewer here seems to have given the status of “classics”. But again, it must be considered that however trashy and ridiculous Dhoom 3 (not a patch on the Roshan starrer Dhoom 2) and Talaash were, after all they starred the poster boy of intelligentsia whom our fanboys such as Utkal and Satyam are always ready to idolize despite him having a filmography which is as mediocre as most of his counterparts.
LikeLike
Utkal
April 25, 2016
This is the reason, the film was looking like an extended PR exercise of Shah Rukh Khan after a point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
donna
April 25, 2016
My favorite part of the movie was when Gaurav slowly became unhinged in jail, it was poetic yet a bit scary at the same time. Saw a nice video about the makeup, it was very interesting, hope it will be included on the DVD.
LikeLike
An Jo
April 25, 2016
More than a year later, Raju was called to another ad shoot, again to be a stand-in for Khan. He arrived, and was in a vanity van preparing for the first shot when he was summoned by one of Khan’s assistants—a woman whom he remembered as “really sharp, beautiful and intimidating.” When she saw Raju, she asked the underling who had escorted him, “This guy is Raju Rahikwar? The same guy who’s been spreading bad publicity about SRK in newspapers?”
http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reporting-and-essays/the-fan-shah-rukh-khan-copied-lookalike
LikeLike
Abhirup
April 25, 2016
‘Dhoom 2’ makes ‘Dhoom 3’ look like ‘Sholay’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
anujsharma587uj
April 26, 2016
Just like you make Rahul Mahajan seem like Einstein.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 26, 2016
Or make Einstein look like Rahul Mahajan.
LikeLike
Abhirup
April 27, 2016
“like you make Rahul Mahajan seem like Einstein.”
You are too generous, my sweet imbecile, but no need to describe me the way you have heard yourself being described by everybody around you, owing, among other things, to your devotion to a non-actor with ugly, rectangular pustules that imbeciles like yourself call abs. I am, and shall not be, among said non-actor’s acolytes, so comparisons to Rahul Mahajan, I am afraid, shall continue to be bestowed on yourself rather than me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
anujsharma587Anuj
April 28, 2016
Neither did the comments section & nor did any of my comment refer to any particular actor in general and yet this clown goes on his usual ranting spree, getting his usual kicks upon even reading the mere mention of his name. Enough to go into deep description of abs and what not!
LikeLike
Abhirup
April 28, 2016
Your comment did refer to a particular actor, the terrible one with rectangular pustules, when you spoke of the “Roshan starrer Dhoom 2′. I know you are as terrible when it comes to reading (among other things) as rectangular pustules is when it comes to acting, but being unable to decipher your own comment means you are stupider than I thought. If you decide to slobber over rectangular pustules at every unavailable opportunity, while simultaneously making disparaging comments about other actors whose boots rectangular pustules isn’t fit to lick, you and rectangular pustules are, deservingly, going to get a lot of grief.
LikeLike
Anuj
April 28, 2016
A mere casual reference to his movie that too as an example is good enough for you to get orgasmic enough and go on a wild and pointless ranting spree! Wow…
LikeLike
Abhirup
April 28, 2016
Your reference was irrelevant and unnecessary, and was accompanied by needless nastiness about other actors, so I decided to give you a gulp of your own medicine. It’s both necessary and admirable on my part.
LikeLike
KayKay
July 10, 2016
Wow! Wow! And double Wow! Perhaps it was the lingering bad taste of his last 6 vapid shitfests that makes Fan such a welcome breath of fresh air from SRK. Enjoyed both his performances, his best in years. One could be uncharitable and call this an exercise in narcissism if not for the fact that SRK chooses to play Aryan like an arrogant, entitled jerk( a throwback to his selfish jerk in KANK), A brave decision, for how easy would it have been for Aryan to be written as a paragon of virtue (which I strongly suspect how the character would have been written if this movie was South Indian), at the mercy of a demented fan.
SPOILER! SPOILER! SPOILER!
But Khan shades his superstar with a stubborn, resilient arrogance that humanizes the character .I liked the fact that even when he’s staring at the lifeless body of Gaurav in the end, he refrains from apologizing for his actions which, let’s face it, was the tipping point for the young man morphing from obsessed fan boy to deranged stalker. Instead of meeting Gaurav face to face and admonishing him for his actions, Aryan arrogantly gets the cops to catch, imprison and beat him, setting former on the path of vengeance.
If Gaurav and millions like him made Aryan the star, then Aryan’s actions create Gaurav the deranged, vengeful loon.
Devoted Fan makes Star, Star makes Psychotic Fan.
Who would have thought an SRK movie would interest itself in exploring this vicious duality?
Beats watching him mangle the Tamil Language and slurp fried noodles with curd.
LikeLike
theartofexpressions
January 29, 2017
“But in his head, his life is a movie, an Aryan Khanna movie. Again, the difference between who he thinks he is, who he is.”
@BR I always read that line and nodding and understood what u were saying (to say, i got informed or knowledge) But I never could apply this knowledge while I used to think about this movie..
Today while reading this review again [have read 4-5 times since its a complex lovely movie] and thinking about the scene where Gaurav manages to fight with 3-4 boys [since I was on that para in ur review], It kind of clicked properly.
And now I want to see the movie again while keeping this mind that there are two Gaurav, one in his head and one as a normal person in life.
I remember watching Nolan telling interesting things about Memento and he was telling something similar about the character. Below is the view.
LikeLike
Snehal
January 30, 2017
Finally saw it and what a great SRK movie! I wish all the action was clipped short though, felt like a detour to get to the point. To use Karan Johar’s terms – Pet bhar ke shahrukh ko dekha 🙂
SRK talking about the Fan, Suri from Rab Ne Bana De Jodi and the wedding dance scene here at about the 2 min mark.
LikeLike