Spoilers ahead…
Cute. That’s the word that kept flashing through my mind while watching Ashwini Iyer Tiwari’s Nil Battey Sannata. The film is about a domestic help named Chanda (Swara Bhaskar) – she does a number of other odd jobs as well – who despairs that her daughter Apeksha (Ria Shukla) isn’t interested in studies, and an early scene shows Chanda attempting to rouse a sleeping Apeksha. The girl rubs her eyes and complains that had her name not begun with an A, she’d not be at the top of the attendance roster; she could go in a little late. Chanda smiles and replies that she should probably change her name to “Zandu Balm.” That’s the kind of cute I’m talking about. Much later, we get the scene where Chanda goes to the district collector’s (Sanjay Suri) house and is turned away by the security guard. We get the scene again. And again. And again. Finally, when the collector notices her and asks her in, we learn that she’s there to ask him… how one can become a collector. Couldn’t she have asked someone else? Did she need to go to the collector to get an answer to this question? But then, that wouldn’t have been as… cute. Even the central conceit is cuter than cute, with Chanda enrolling in Apeksha’s school, in the same class, in order to learn the same lessons so she can tutor the girl. If this film were a child, you’d be pinching its chubby cheeks.
The problem I kept fighting through the film wasn’t this cuteness, this deliberate distance from gritty reality. After all, Kaaka Muttai was about people from a similar social stratum, and it was button-cute as well. But there’s a difference. Kaaka Muttai was a boys’ own adventure presented as a light comedy, but we sensed the darker layers underneath – the film did not trivialise or judge any aspect of these lives. The film was just a fleeting episode, whereas Nil Battey Sannata is about Apeksha’s life, her future. Apeksha does not like studies because she feels she’s destined to become a bai like her mother, and this upsets Chanda. Chanda dreams big, and she’s dismayed that Apeksha marvels at someone getting a sarkari naukri at Rs. 8000 a month. (Another kid in Apeksha’s class wants to learn English so that he can drive an air-conditioned cab – wearing a uniform.) The film never answers the question: So if Apeksha wants to become a bai, then why shouldn’t she become a bai?
Apeksha is a Ranbir Kapoor fan, and it’s hard not to think of Wake Up Sid, where the audience – middle-class and upper-class multiplex-goers, largely – was encouraged to empathise with an upper-class boy whose parent wasn’t allowing him to do what he wanted to do, even if the boy did not know what he wanted to do. I was vaguely troubled by the fact that the same middle-class and upper-class multiplex-going audience – largely the target for this film, too – is being encouraged to empathise with the parent, this time, who wants Apeksha to become a collector. I certainly understand that Chanda wants this. And I can understand if Apeksha had a natural aptitude for whatever makes a collector a collector, something that needed coaxing out, something that Chanda saw and saw fit to encourage, like how the Madhavan character saw the innate aggression in the Ritika Singh character in Irudhi Suttru/Saala Khadoos and decided that unless he intervened, she’d continue to waste her life away.
But the film just takes the position that being a bai is a horrible thing. (The last scene, with Apeksha all grown up, drives this stance home with a sun-rises-in-the-east ring of certainty.) And we just don’t see why it’s such a bad thing. This is where the film’s cuteness works against it. The director doesn’t want to get her hands dirty, so we don’t see Chanda sweeping or mopping floors, or scrubbing a mountain of dirty dishes. Chanda has the best employer ever, a supremely compassionate Dr. Dewan (Ratna Pathak Shah, who appears to be having the time of her career). Her duties seem to consist of helping with the gardening, or manicuring nails, or administering a head massage – and it’s easy to see why Apeksha thinks this isn’t such a bad deal. Look, I’m not saying that one shouldn’t aspire to become something other than a bai. I’m just saying that one cannot automatically impose one’s wishes on a young girl either, through a series of cute contrivances, without talking things out. I’m saying that if we’re okay with an upper-class Sid being something of an aimless slacker, maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to judge a lower-class girl who just wants to be a bai in an upper-class household, make enough to get through the month, and watch a lot of TV.
The director probably knows she’s preaching to the converted – and what a tragedy that the real audience for this film, the audience that needs to watch it, isn’t going to get the chance – and her sensibilities match those of the multiplex audience that wants a bit of reality but not enough to sour the taste of popcorn. So she sands off all the rough edges and situates the empowerment message in a warm-and-fuzzy “feel-good” zone. We can feel good about applauding this girl’s escape from bai-hood. The film is beautifully staged – though perhaps too much so, with a gauzy yellow light that softens the squalor and music that’s like a warm bath. Chanda works in a mill, a shoe factory, a roadside food stall – and everyone around is super-nice to her. Even when an employer fires her, he doesn’t raise his voice, and even when she loses all her savings, you don’t feel her loss. (By then the film’s feel-goodism is so entrenched, you know the crisis will pass quickly.) And I doubt there have been kids this tolerant of a grown-up in their class. A few giggles on seeing her, a small jab about her height – and that’s it. They’re all soon best buddies.
The feel-goodism extends to the dialogues too. “Tere paas sawaal bahut hain. Tumne kabhi jawab dhoondhne ki koshish nahin ki.” It’s a great line. It feels right. And it’d look great on a greeting card. But it’s uttered to Apeksha, who isn’t really questioning her life. She just wants to get her mother off her back. Elsewhere, Apeksha looks accusingly at Chanda and says, “Apne sapne mujh pe thop rahi hai,” and we get a response much later, when a wise-beyond-his-years classmate tells Apeksha, “Uska to sapna hi tum ho.” Again, the line melts the heart – but how is this any justification for Chanda’s actions? Even the casting of Swara Bhaskar is a feel-good decision. She is a warm, easy-to-like presence, with no shades of prickliness – even her cusswords come off like cute endearments.
If there is some frustration with the facileness at its core, it’s because Nil Battey Sannata isn’t a stupid, lazily made, one-note message movie, like the recent Chalk N Duster. There’s a ton of atmosphere, flavour, nuance, gentle humour, and the film makes a strong case for what I felt was its real message: that we need more women filmmakers. They craft female characters in ways that many male filmmakers simply don’t. (Or maybe it’s just that male filmmakers choose to tell very different stories.) If Dr. Dewan’s husband is relegated to the background, the way mute wives of powerful men in feudal dramas are, there’s barely a mention of Chanda’s absent husband. And despite the film being set in Agra, with the Taj Mahal looming as a constant reminder of love, Chanda doesn’t seem to be bothered that she’s not in a relationship. Even the handsome (and single) collector isn’t roped into the movie for a love angle. In the absence of these “traditional” pairings, the film’s central relationships – between Chanda-Apeksha, Chanda-Dr. Dewan – shine brightly. Chanda calls Dr. Dewan didi, and there’s the suggestion they are some kind of soul sisters. It’s not hard to imagine that Chanda is at least as important to Dr. Dewan as her husband is, the way it is with domestic helps and mistresses in so many households. In contrast, Chanda and Apeksha have a more combative relationship, that of equals. “Maa hoon teri,” Chanda says. “To baap banne ki koshish mat kar,” warns Apeksha, who seems to have happily fallen in line with a patriarchal mode of thinking that only fathers should make the really important decisions. The film could have used more of these screaming matches, and fewer of the messagey sessions (though the latter don’t grate all that much, given the fact that a parent would say messagey things to a child).
As Apeksha, Ria Shukla is astounding. She captures both the unwitting cruelty of children and the feeling a recalcitrant horse must feel when someone is trying to break it. Watch the look she throws at Chanda after solving a problem in maths, her weak area. (Now you know where the cute title comes from.) It’s a look that hovers between “shit, this stuff is fascinating; I now know what you were going on about, wanting me to study harder” and “I can crack this; I’ll get more marks than you and put you in your place.” The kids around Apeksha – the actors who play Pintu, Sweety, Aman (who’s called in a little too often to patly resolve complicated plot points) – are all fantastic. And Pankaj Tripathi walks away with the movie as the headmaster, prone to sitting in the lotus position in exam halls. It’s a delightfully cartoony performance, and you sense a man so bored with his job, with the bratty kids, with the platitudes he has to spout, that he decided to liven things up by putting on a show. He’s another reason you cannot easily dismiss films like Nil Battey Sannata. If nothing else, they exist as showcases for severely underused talents.
KEY:
- Nil Battey Sannata = a useless person, a dunce
- Kaaka Muttai = see here
- sarkari naukri = government job
- Wake Up Sid = see here
- Irudhi Suttru/Saala Khadoos = see here
- bai = domestic help
- “Tere paas sawaal bahut hain. Tumne kabhi jawab dhoondhne ki koshish nahin ki.” = You have many questions, but you haven’t looked for answers.
- “Apne sapne mujh pe thop rahi hai” = You’re forcing your dreams on me.
- “Uska to sapna hi tum ho” = Her dream is… you.
- Chalk N Duster = see here
- didi = elder sister
- “Maa hoon teri” = I am you mother.
- “To baap banne ki koshish mat kar” = Then don’t try to become my father.
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Radhika
April 24, 2016
In Wake Up Sid – was the message that the hero was an aimless slacker and that was okay? I thought it was that he was spoilt and pampered and confused – but when he found his vocation, photography, he did find his niche in life and became a non-slacker. Something like the hero of Lakshya – a highly underrated movie in its exploration of career confusion.
I don’t think the point is that Apeksha should not be a bai, but that she is too young to know that for certain, and in her false certainty, she could well be boxing herself out of other options. If she studies, gets some marketable skills and then decides, bai-dom is great, then sure, that’s a real choice. Flunking school and becoming a bai because that’s the only thing she’s seen up close, is not really a route any society should advocate to the young ones.
LikeLiked by 5 people
brangan
April 24, 2016
Radhika: I agree with the latter half of your comment, and of course she is too young to know better. But the film doesn’t deal with these niceties. My point is this:
“I’m just saying that one cannot automatically impose one’s wishes on a young girl either, through a series of cute contrivances, without talking things out. ”
I’d have liked to not take this as a given, and reason this out… instead of automatically saying “Collector”. Also, the film’s feel-good vibe doesn’t really drive any point home.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 24, 2016
I think it is an excellent movie reading between the lines. You are grumbling too much. See the larger picture instead of nitpicking, for a change. Even a bai does not want her daughter to end up a bai. Everyone aims higher and thats why so much struggle parents undergo.
If we are not on their backs, they may become drug addicts too. Dont tell me what is wrong with being a drug addict? Even a thief wont approve if his son wants to become professional thief.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 24, 2016
It seems you want cowdung, spit stains, dirty open drains to depict the beauty of poverty.
Come on, we have too many such films. Let us have something watchable without turning our eyes away again and again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neetha
April 24, 2016
Have you seen Randeep Hooda’s Laal Rang… Looking forward to ur review of it
LikeLike
Rakesh
April 24, 2016
Dhanush is remaking.this movie. In Tamil …interesting… With illayaraja s music
LikeLike
uniquebluerose
April 24, 2016
I really really liked this movie…..
Esp the point on how Chanda goes about her routine every day without losing hope…..
and I believe that sometimes these totally feel good movies are also needed…..
Ratnaji was great her intro with her being heads down was like……so may of her lines had me smiling
The bespectacled young class mate was a surprise….I mean when he didn’t bring lunch all I assumed was a motherless child may be lower middle class family but he himself was working as mechanic…etc was nice touch I felt.
Ruchi was great she performed really well…..the cruelty that the kids sometimes express and do was shown perfectly by her….
and well I think Chanda going to Collector for info seemed ok…she does ask her doctor didi how much it costs to become doctor or engineer…..who is herself a doctor…..he seemed pretty reasonable person because of which may be she got her guts to ask him directly…..she actually studies in the same school as her daughter befriends her daughters friends …in short does everything gutsy if you ask me…..
Actually all the kids were like super good performers.
As for the kids taking lightly to Chanda joining their class I think is because she doesn’t try to act grown up except for the fact of her trying to keep studying….
She befriends both the kids in their own way…..
@ Rakesh….well this is news….hope he doesn’t make the appearance as the collector 🙂
BRji as for no love angle between opposite sex…..you are so right its so refreshing to see more and more movies which doesn’t rely on these things….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utkal
April 24, 2016
“And we just don’t see why it’s such a bad thing. ” We do. ( even from the trailer that I have seen, I have to say, ” We do.” I think Radhika has expained it well. ” she is too young to know that for certain, and in her false certainty, she could well be boxing herself out of other options.” THere is more to it actually.In the trailer there is a quastion that Apeksh asks of her mother: Even she did well and apssed the exams does her mother have the weherwithal to make her a doctor or engineer? So she wamts to be a bai not because she is passionate about bemg bai, but because she sees not not too many options. Tant si what is wrong about her wanting to be a bai…wanting to be bai because she thinks she has no optons. She is not averse to being a doctor or engineer. Basically she would like to do better in life if she could. And bein ga collector would fall in that bracket too. Her mother knows tbis much. And Apeksha does too. So there is nothing to ‘explain’. All she has to do is to help her get out of this hoplessness and show her that it can be done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amit Joki
April 24, 2016
Rakesh: Yes. It is Amma Kanakku, produced by Dhanush. Amala Paul will be playing Swara Bhaskar’s role.
It was slated to be released simultaneously, but that didn’t happen some how. Expect Amala to carry off the role with as much ease.
LikeLike
blurb
April 24, 2016
I have not watched the movie, but the point you make about the dreams of a parent imposed on the child: this reminds me of Good Will Hunting somehow. Skarsgard imposing on (manipulating?) Matt Damon. There too, the audiences (especially like yours truly) don’t get this until the scene with the spat between Robin Williams and the Professor spells it out. Until then, it’s the gesture of magnanimous professor who has the kid’s best interest at heart.
And that’s scary. That no one gets it until then.. (or was it just me?)
Lovely writing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
April 24, 2016
blurb: And I felt the film needed such scenes. Things like education and empowerment may be very obvious to us as an audience, but it’s a film’s duty to spell out (either directly or obliquely) why these things are important to the CHARACTER, to convince us about the character transformations.
There are two instances of the girl studying hard, the first due to a short-term bet, and then, because she transforms really for the good.
I could easily buy the first instance, the fact that the girl studied hard because she wanted to win the bet and get her mother off her back. From the child’s POV, there is a clear line of motivation here. (1) I had a bet with my mother. (2) She said if I get more marks than her, she will stop coming to school. (3) I don’t want her in school. (4) And so I’m going to study hard.
When you’re that young, these motivations are most important.
But for the second instance, you cannot give abstract things like “Uska sapna to tu hi hai.” I would have liked the girl to really understand what she was being asked to do and WHY.
All the film gives us is “mom is slogging hard, so I must do this for her.” Which may be valid in its own way, but that’s emotional manipulation and it rings false in a film that’s otherwise so high-minded and dignified.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
April 24, 2016
I see this story not as that of a bai and her daughter. She is not even a bai in the true bambaiya sense. She can be called companion, help or maid.
It is the story of any ordinary midleclass mother and her daughter. Sitting with an angry child making her complete the homework, prepare well for the exams etc. etc. It is almost like going to school with the child. As for aspirations, there are many options nowadays. The topmost is mostly medicine and the last one is software engineer. Who wants to be a Collector with politicians making them dance to their tunes? Only some mothers want their children to complete their own dreams. Most mothers simply want good education and a good career so that the daughters can stand on their feet. They have to be on their backs because it has become too competitive oriented. Just see those cutoff marks. And how many are gifted to pursue some freelancing and how many can afford it? No doubt there are so many suicides among students. The pressure is too much.
LikeLike
olemisstarana
April 26, 2016
Okay, this has nothing to do with the movie which I have not seen, but I need a moment to rant.
Gurmeet Ram Rahim etc. Singh won the Dada Saheb Phalke Award? What the ever loving phuck?
/rant over.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apu
April 26, 2016
That is an interesting comparison – Wake up Sid vs Nil Battey Sannata. I would not go into arguments about how both are believable, because, I am guessing your objection is stemming mainly from the fact that in this case, it was not “made to feel believable”. I am wondering if the director did not make an effort to decipher this for the audience because she was thinking “who in their right mind would support being a bai?” (especially the multiplex audience)
Sanjana: yes, it might have been as simple as “Everyone aims higher”, but what Brangan is bringing up is that – why is it that we do not support a businessman parent who wants his son to follow in his footsteps, why is it then that we talk about “following your heart” and “finding your dream” or whatever lines they put on hallmark cards? What makes us buy into the dreams of a son born to a rich father vs a daughter born to a poor mother?
Btw, isn’t maid/help = bai in Mumbai?
LikeLike
Aditya (Gradwolf)
April 26, 2016
@olemisstarana: It is some Dada Saheb Phalke foundation film awards. Even Madhur Bhandarkar won for making “women centric films”. So the whole thing is a moo point. It is NOT the award Nadigar Thilagam etc won. The latest winner of that original award is Manoj Kumar.
LikeLike
Utkal
April 26, 2016
Apu: “What makes us buy into the dreams of a son born to a rich father vs a daughter born to a poor mother?” We learly: would vwry much support the dream of a daughter born of a poor mother. Except that here it was NOT Apeksha’s dream to be a Bai. It is more than clear that she DOES NOT want to be a bai. In fcat when she says. ” An engineer’s son becomes an egineer. A doctor’s son becomes a dctor. A bai’s daughter will become a bai”, she is taunting her mother. She mentiions it quite clearly, when she says, ” If I were to pass class X, do you have the wherewithal to educate me to become an engineer or a doctor? How much more explicit one can be? When she says, ” Is mulk meing mein apna career choose karne ka freedom nahin hia kisi ko” she has her tingue firmly in her cheek. Everyine in the audince laughs. I am amazed! How can anyone be so naive to think that her dream is to be a bai!
LikeLike
sanjana
April 26, 2016
Apu: Becoming a bai cannot be a dream even if I am politically incorrect. It is a lazy option. By the way I dont support the hero of Wake up Sid. His is also a lazy choice.
These instances are all a sort of rebellion against parents.
LikeLike
brangan
April 26, 2016
Utkal: How can anyone be so naive to think that her dream is to be a bai!
But who’s saying that?
LikeLiked by 3 people
brangan
April 26, 2016
Also, I wish people would see the film before commenting. The film shows a bai’s life as something out of a glossy magazine. I’m not asking for Smita Patil in Chakra. But you should do one of two things: Either show how horrible Chanda’s life is, so we buy the fact that Apeksha needs to be shaken from her apathy. Or have that Good Will Hunting scene where Apeksha sees why she should aim higher.
I’m not just talking about generalities here. of course every bai wants her child to lead a better life. I’m talking about the specifics of a movie, where the screenwriting convinces you about a character change.
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
April 26, 2016
Also, I was disturbed by how this film seemed to automatically dismiss certain types of honest hard work. We’re asked to laugh (though not cruelly) at a boy who dreams of becoming a driver. We’re asked to laugh (again, not cruelly) at a girl who thinks a government job at 8000 a month is amazing.
My point is: Why should everyone have the same dreams? As I said in the review:
maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to judge a lower-class girl who just wants to be a bai in an upper-class household, make enough to get through the month, and watch a lot of TV.
I’m not saying I’m right. But I would like some discussion around this, as I found the film’s attitude troubling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
April 26, 2016
Think from parent’s viewpoint. That is most of the parents’ view. I am a parent and so my views are like that.
I will not laugh but I will be mildly bemused just if someone says he wants to become president of India. Its nothing about class. Many of my friends were fascinated by trains and they wanted to become drivers and that is a good paying job too. Just like pilots. Pilot is also a driver but his salary is something else.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 26, 2016
Kids like certain professions like engine driver, pilot etc. Some oversmart kids like to be president or prime minister. Some want to be doctors or engineers or teachers.
Papa kehte hai bada naam karega
Magar yeh to koi na jaane
ye meri manzil hai kahan.
LikeLike
Utkal
April 26, 2016
“How can anyone be so naive to think that her dream is to be a bai!
But who’s saying that?” Apu seems to imply that to be a bai was her dream when she says:What makes us buy into the dreams of a son born to a rich father vs a daughter born to a poor mother?
LikeLike
olemisstarana
April 26, 2016
@Aditya (Gradwolf)L Man… speak about dilution of brand. This is pissing straight into it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
April 26, 2016
One more thing. Just because I supported the poor mother against the poor child, how can it be assumed that I supported only rich kids against their super rich parents? Why should I be slotted?
LikeLike
Utkal
April 26, 2016
Nil Battey Sannata: It’s a Gem
Director Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari and her team of writers have created a simple yet heart-warming tale that goes down like a warm bowl of soup, making you feel good all over. It is also refreshing to see the kind of people whom you usually don’t get to see on screen: a domestic help or bai, her daughter studying in Class X of a government school, her school friends that includes a driver’s son and the teachers of such a school. The director is clear in her head about what she wants to serve us. She is not trying to give us a slice of life steeped in social realism. Her heroine looks young and pretty, dressed in clean clothes. There is not too much dust and grime at her home. The lady of the house she works in, a doctor, has a heart of gold. Yes, things are sanitized, so we, the multiplex audience can watch it as entertainment. After all, that’s what we go to a multiplex for, right? But the film has heart, intelligent writing, gentle humour and endearing performances. And I was charmed.
http://utkaleidoscope.com/nil-battey-sannata/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Aditya (Gradwolf)
April 27, 2016
BR, I had problems with the film’s preachy tone towards the end. Especially the Aman character’s break down of how to learn mathematics or how he is used to show Apeksha around to let her know about her mother’s daily struggles. Same as you about the abstract motivation vs an actual means to an end. Add to this some manipulative background score.
But I am not sure about the bai dreams and why that is problematic. Almost every kid in that school comes from the same part of society. And like Apeksha, Pintu too wants to follow his dad – become a taxi driver. Yes, if we are talking judgements and everything, I understand where you are coming from. One cannot think of anyone as any lesser on the basis of their aspirations. But in the film’s world, this made sense. Chanda clearly does not want her child to face the same struggles that she did. It is just very obvious that in this case, Chanda knows what she is talking about whereas Apeksha doesn’t. And just like any parent, Chanda doesn’t want Apeksha to learn those things the hard way. Maybe if it comes to it and she’s left with no choice but she has to give it a shot. I also disagree with the film showing her life as something out of a glossy magazine. I mean, the bai part of her life is just that, a part. Like you mention in the review, she does several odd jobs. And even the glossy nature comes up because she’s blessed with an employer like Dr. Dewan. I think that’s a liberty Tiwari took because without Dr. Dewan’s plodding and kindly ways, Chanda wouldn’t feel at ease at least in one job of hers. Also I liked that Tiwari made it a point to show Dr. Dewan as truly such an invested (in Chanda’s life) character. In a scene, she is literally sitting on the streets with Chanda and her friends pass by and ask her why she didn’t show up for their meet. And she says – mood nahin tha, and she says it in only a half sincere way (All credit to Ratna Pathak for bringing this out). She really doesn’t enjoy that and she seems to have somewhat prioritized helping Chanda.
The comparison with Wake Up Sid is off because in that film it sticks up as a first world problem. Sid is privileged enough to waste his time (or in other words take his own sweet time to decide on a future). Sid’s parents are privileged enough to give him all the time in the world and he can even get by as a photographer because a lot of other things are handed to him in a platter. Apeksha/Chanda do not have that kind of time, that privilege to choose whatever they want or be ok with ones choice, whatever it is. I think, like you say in the above comment, “not cruelly” is very important here. That takes away the judgemental part IMO. (I also liked that Tiwari added that part about Apeksha rebuking – is desh mein bachon ko apne career decide karne ka koi freedom hi nahin hai!)
I had problems with the film but this part did not bother me at all.
I remember reading an article last year – how “doing what you love” itself is a form of privilege. I’ll try to dig up the link. I think that is at the center of this film (or at least what we are discussing).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Apu
April 27, 2016
Sanjana: “how can it be assumed that I supported only rich kids against their super rich parents? Why should I be slotted?”
Gosh, no one was slotting you. You mentioned some lines that I responded to. Peace out!
Utkal: I have not seen the movie. I was just articulating Brangan’s question to Sanjana.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apu
April 27, 2016
BTW Utkal: That was a lovely short review, and so underlines what BR was saying.
LikeLike
brangan
April 27, 2016
Aditya: Look, I am not saying the mom is wrong at all. Of course, every parent would want their child to live a better life. But to pre-decide that one should become a collector, despite no inkling of any natural abilities… This isn’t about “freedom of choice” so much as forcing a child to do something the mom wants. It all sounds pretty lala land to me. I still feel the film needed scenes where the child learnt why it was important to do what her mother says, as opposed to “oh my poor mother is struggling.”
And about “glossy,” what I meant is that the film does not make a bai’s life seem so onerous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
April 27, 2016
Gradwolf or Aditya: you put it very well. A rich kid has his riches to fall back upon if his career or hobby or whim does not take off. It is somewhat like comparing US with Bangladesh.
LikeLike
sanjana
April 27, 2016
Becoming a Collector is somewhat easy. You can be a graduate in arts, not necessarily sciences. And it also costs less. One needs only to work hard, mug up and prepare for the interview with some coaching. If the bai belongs to reserved category, it will be much more easy.
LikeLike
Aditya (Gradwolf)
April 27, 2016
BR, do you think you would have reacted differently had they not shown that last interview scene? For me that was a sore thumb. I get the part that the film needed scenes where Apeksha understood it better than just watching her mother struggle (But I did like the part that she sees how Aman is less luckier than her. HE works like Chanda when he is not in school.). Which is why I am repeating the point that every kid here has to go the extra mile and is not in a position to choose whatever he or she wishes to become. I know she need not be forced to become a collector, but I am also saying that it is not as simple for this set of kids to recognize some natural abilities and stick to it. In fact there is a case to be made that Chanda chooses this path because it costs very little and does not need mathematics and only hard work (harking back to Dr. Dewan’s words of kismat vs mehnat). For the class of people we see it is one thing to be forced by parents to aim higher or aim at what is remotely possible and another to say, do what you love and go for it. Nine times out of ten, they’ll go, well, I wish.
LikeLike
Utkal
April 27, 2016
The reasons for Chanda wanting to make Apu a collector are very well dealt with in the film. Let us start with the fact that Apu does not have any special gift or passion (like so many of us). She does not want be a dancer, an artist, a scientist, an engineer, a doctor, or a social worker. So all Chanda wants her daughter to do is to do better in life. What does that mean? More money, more security, more respect in society, more power. Let us contrast this with a bai’s life. As a bai she might be reasonably comfortable, but just abut. But look at the negatives. She does not have paid leave that she can claim as her right. She does not have provident fund, pension or any kind of super annuity. She does not have medical expenses reimbursement. And as a bai she is not looked at with respect by anybody. In contrast, the collector has all of these. She saw with her own eyes the kind of respect he commands and power he enjoys. And he can have all this while being a perfect gentleman and a nice human being. She got a further taste of it when she tries to meet him at his bungalow. And here comes the clincher: It is possible to be a collector without attending an expensive engineering or medical college. She can attend any government college which charges virtually nothing for a degree course or even a PG course. All it takes after that, as the collector testifies, is hard work. It is okay to dream big, but one has to do a reality check. How practically realizable is that dream? And being a collector fits in perfectly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shantesh Row
April 27, 2016
The Mum is a Bai. Film based in Mumbai? 😀
LikeLike
brangan
April 29, 2016
Here’s a link to a piece from Jai Arjun Singh, who seems to feel the same way:
“There is nothing wrong with failing, it says, as long as you at least make the effort to follow a dream – so far, so good. But there is also the implication that some dreams are acceptable while others aren’t: it isn’t cool to dream of being a driver, for instance (even if the dream involves wearing a uniform and driving a posh car) – you should aim higher. Nor is it okay to be a bai, even the high-end sorts who get called “nannies”; set your sights straight on civil service (and hope that you get the right advice from an honest, helpful, self-made government officer…
Near the end, the collector takes Chanda and Apeksha for a ride in his car – they sit in the back, with him, but I kept thinking about the uniformed chauffeur in the front seat. And about other bais earning honest livelihoods. And about the watchmen outside the collector’s bungalow, who become soft targets for a story that turns out to have conditional empathy for genuinely unprivileged people.”
http://jaiarjun.blogspot.in/2016/04/parents-children-and-changing-equations.html
LikeLike
Great God Glib
June 30, 2016
late to this party… just caught this movie, but given that you wanted a discussion about this, I thought I’d add my two cents… 🙂
If I understand you correctly (more from the comments than the piece itself), you have two separate objections to the don’t-be-a-bai trope. at times, you’re saying that apeksha is turned into an object for her mother’s projected ambitions, which stem directly from her own perceived failures (matric-fail, bai, doomed to work multiple jobs and still live hand to mouth). That’s spot on, and it has worrying social dimensions that I think you’re hinting at–that it reinforces the views of middle class parents who think it’s OK to fit their children into their own stereotypes of what “success” is. I don’t know if this is what Aditya was talking about above, but I think I’d have liked the movie a great deal more if Apeksha had been successful, but not lived her mother’s sapna… if, for example, she’d become a teacher or a journalist (or a film critic!) rather than an IAS aspirant. If she’d been the one giving maths tuitions, for eg.
Your other criticism I like less, because it’s less substantial. You’re saying that being a bai ought to be OK. It ought to be, but it isn’t something anyone aspires to, in the world we live in. Because it’s a hard life, and the movie’s able to demonstrate that sufficiently, I felt. By showing that Chanda is at risk of losing her ration, fees, and everything else, in a one-day spending spree.
Here’s what I didn’t like about the movie. the collector was entirely unnecessary, except as Sanjay Suri making a (very wooden) goodwill appearance. Aman is a little know-it-all, and seemingly is the mutant spawn of Aamir Khan and Sexy-the-cancer-girl from Cheeni Kum. The boy gets too many epigrams, most of which are entirely facile (maths ko apne zindagi ke saath jod do; maths se dosti kar lo… I can imagine Sri Sri Ravi Shankar saying these lines with a straight face, but that’s about it).
PS: one side effect of your review is that I’m now imagining Wake Up Sid 2, in which Ranbir Kapoor’s character decides he wants to be a bai. If they could make that sell, it would be one hell of a movie!
LikeLiked by 1 person