Spoilers ahead…
As a Tamilian, I’m going to be nursing nightmares for years about Baaghi, for the film features an act of murder using… poisoned curd rice. To those of you who don’t get it, let me attempt an explanation: this is the gastronomic equivalent of the scene in Khakee where Akshay Kumar is betrayed by Aishwarya Rai. That such perfection, an object of such heart-bursting love, could bear within it such malice – ah, the very thought. But the point is, even without the curd rice, there’s a lot of South Indianness in Baaghi. You have, for instance, the elderly gent going “Rama Rama,” which, in Bollywood-ese, means he belongs to one of the four Southern states. (The answer to his character’s “what is my motivation?” question would be, “You eat idlis.”) Then you have Kerala, showcased in all its god’s-own-country splendour. Also, the film is essentially a PSA for kalaripayattu.
Above all, Baaghi is a loose remake of the Telugu blockbuster Varsham, which isn’t all that surprising given that Heropanti, the last time director Sabbir Khan and hero Tiger Shroff came together, was a remake of the Telugu blockbuster Parugu. It’s not fashionable in these multiplex times to like this kind of movie, and I’m not saying these are great films either. But it’s refreshing to see a young Bollywood star announce, through the selection of his films, that he’s targeting the increasingly neglected single-screen audiences. Why is this important? Because the “mass movie” is our own home-grown cinema, and with films like Heropanti and Baaghi, we’re seeing hipper versions of the mass movies we grew up with.
Translation: the focus is on the USP, the action. A love duet is interrupted by a blow to the head. The comedy track (with a blind cabbie!) is perfunctorily done away with – the cabbie quickly becomes the hero’s helper in the latter’s mission to retrieve the abducted heroine (Shraddha Kapoor). In the film’s words, he becomes a Hanuman, the villain (Sudheer Babu) is Raavan, and the hero has to infiltrate a raakshas-filled Lanka, which is now a multi-storey building in Bangkok. That’s what mass movies do all the time. They draw from the bottomless wells of myth. Even the heroine’s name sounds like something from the Ramayana. It’s Sia – when spelt out, it looks like one of those nameplates from which a letter fell off. These films also draw from the bottomless wells of other people’s imagination, the people who made The Raid: Redemption and The Karate Kid and the Bruce Lee movies.
You just wish that they’d put some effort into fleshing out the emotional beats. We don’t ask for logic in these films, but when a revered teacher dies, we want to embrace the death with our hearts. We want to weep with the hero. The writing is downright lazy. The hero accepts this mission – the heroine is his ex – only because he needs money to save a mute kid. But what happened, exactly, to the kid? Why not make the heroine’s discovery of her father’s treachery more dramatic? And why describe the hero as a rebel? Just because the film’s title says so? We get a couple of laughable shots in which he sticks a cigarette into his mouth and grips a can of beer, but what is he rebelling against? These slices of dramatic steaks are drained of all blood. Though I must admit a huge muahahaha erupted from me at the prospect of Hindi audiences being saddled with a one-hundred-percent mass-movie-style loosu ponnu. Sia loves rain. She talks to raindrops. Or maybe she talks to clouds. Why have you stopped? Won’t you send a little more rain my way? I hear Hansika Motwani is negotiating hard for the Tamil rights.
But once the film gets going – and it really does, in the second half – it’s pretty single-minded. This is the star vehicle Heropanti should have been. Shroff is a strange (in an interesting way) presence. His body is all macho the way we define it today – he seems to have sprouted muscles that have yet to be discovered – but neck up, his face is shy, gentle, even feminine (in an interesting way). He looks like someone from the pages of an Italian fashion magazine, from one of those black-and-white ads for an Armani perfume, an inscrutable hunk by the seashore, staring at something in the horizon. You can’t see this man in a mass movie at all, but every time the film shifts into action gear, Shroff comes into his own. The action in Baaghi works because the technical team knows how to choreograph and shoot and cut action, but also because Shroff is a completely convincing action hero. Watching him climb and kick and vault over walls, you may be reminded of how sublimely Bruce Lee moved. Even while breaking a bad guy’s bones, he seems to be hearing Swan Lake inside his head.
KEY:
- Baaghi = rebel
- raakshas = demon
- kalaripayattu = see here
- Khakee = see here and here
- Heropanti = see here
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
sravishanker1401gmailcom
May 1, 2016
BR : “Even while breaking a bad guy’s bones, he seems to be hearing Swan Lake inside his head”.
Awesome writing !
LikeLiked by 1 person
ideallaedi
May 2, 2016
It has already been remade in Tamil 🙂 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazhai
LikeLike
Aditya Kashyap
May 2, 2016
Too bad for Hansika Motwani! As the movie was already remade into Tamil as ‘Mazhai’ with Jayam Ravi and Shriya Saran quite a few years ago, Brangan 😀
Also, there are 5 states in the south now! cringes and runs away
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amit Joki
May 2, 2016
Ennadha irunthaalum namma action hero Vishal maari vara mudiyuma?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indrani Sen
May 2, 2016
BR, Lovely review as usual. By the way, Sia is how Sita is often called in north India. For example “Siapati Ramchandra ki jai!”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
May 2, 2016
Excellent review!
His body is all macho the way we define it today – he seems to have sprouted muscles that have yet to be discovered – but neck up, his face is shy, gentle, even feminine (in an interesting way). He looks like someone from the pages of an Italian fashion magazine, from one of those black-and-white ads for an Armani perfume, an inscrutable hunk by the seashore, staring at something in the horizon.
As a Tamilian, I’m going to be nursing nightmares for years about Baaghi, for the film features an act of murder using… poisoned curd rice. To those of you who don’t get it, let me attempt an explanation: this is the gastronomic equivalent of the scene in Khakee where Akshay Kumar is betrayed by Aishwarya Rai. That such perfection, an object of such heart-bursting love, could bear within it such malice – ah, the very thought. But the point is, even without the curd rice, there’s a lot of South Indianness in Baaghi. You have, for instance, the elderly gent going “Rama Rama,” which, in Bollywood-ese, means he belongs to one of the four Southern states. (The answer to his character’s “what is my motivation?” question would be, “You eat idlis.”)
Cant stop laughing.
LikeLike
sanjana
May 2, 2016
Even the heroine’s name sounds like something from the Ramayana. It’s Sia – when spelt out, it looks like one of those nameplates from which a letter fell off.
North Indians made Sita into Sia. Hanuman into Bajrangi. Lakshman into Lakhan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Manish
May 2, 2016
“Even the heroine’s name sounds like something from the Ramayana. It’s Sia – when spelt out, it looks like one of those nameplates from which a letter fell off.”
FYI, Sita is pronounced as Sia in colloquial hindi, in the cow belt.
LikeLike
Deepak
May 2, 2016
Tiger Shroff reminds me in some ways of Saif when he started out. Making fun of his feminine looks (man, he looks like a woman, hyuk hyuk hyuk and jokes of that sort) was de rigueur during my schooldays. Saif remedied that by first growing some stubble and then taking on some good roles that helped showcase his talents. Of course, Saif also had killer comic timing, even in his early roles. I’m not sure if Shroff has any of that talent, but at least he’s started to grow a stubble so that folks can focus on his actual acting talents and treat his movies on merit.
LikeLike
Bunny
May 2, 2016
@Rangan: Is it safe to assume that the ethos of masculinity have changed? (The were steadily changing but with the staggering success of Varun Dhawan, Tiger etc., the fate of the alpha men seems to have been sealed now.) When ‘Heropanti’ released you wrote a brilliant article on how masculinity was different in the past compared to now. You opened your article with this, “Don’t read this article if you’re a little, uh, sensitive…”
Is it the hairy Alpha men who should have a reason to feel insecure after Tiger and his ilk’s effect on the changing ethos of masculinity? Is it the hairy Alpha man who’s sensitive, insecure and worried now?
LikeLike
brangan
May 2, 2016
Bunny: Thank you so much for reminding me of that article. I cannot stress this enough, how enormously touching it is when readers remember pieces you have forgotten. Getting all mushy on a Monday, but it had to be said 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
May 2, 2016
Curd Rice. It is the simplest, wholesome and very satisfying food that can be consumed with happiness. Its called perugannam in telugu, masuranna in kannada.
You just have to cook rice and mix it with the curds or butter milk.With or without seasoning. A pinch of salt will also do.
Hot rasam and then thayir saadam, the staple food of many in the southern states, escpecially in tamil nadu and karnataka.
LikeLike
SJ
May 2, 2016
Seeing the movie poster my first thought was: someone in the ‘Making of Baaghi’ is going to say, “Actually, the abs are like a character in this movie.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
venkatesh
May 2, 2016
Ok , i love the action sequences from the Trailer.
We had another hero earlier on who was doing proper high quality action movies , dont remember his name or actual what movie it was anymore. But that also had a similar plot line, girl goes missing, hero rescues her type of stuff.
We need like a proper action blockbuster., that shows the entire choreography.
LikeLike
malayalidom
May 2, 2016
Sir do watch the malayalam film Jacobinte Swargarajyam .Waiting for your response.
LikeLike
priyazzillionthoughts
May 3, 2016
Oh? So is it not the remake of the so 90s Salman Khan-Nagma starrer Bhaagi? Arrey..for a week, the songs Kaisa Lagta Hai and Chandni Raat hai have been earworms for nothing?
Chey!
Super review, as always.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deepak
May 3, 2016
@Venkatesh – I think you meant Vidyut Jamwal, who starred in Commando. He was also the villain in Thuppaakki and also in Force.
@priyazzillionthoughts – Even I’d thought so, but it appears that they only took the name Baaghi from the Salman Khan movie. The story seems to be ripped from Varsham/Mazhai as mentioned by few folks above.
LikeLike
venkatesh
May 3, 2016
@Deepak: You are absolutely right.
LikeLike
Ravi K
May 3, 2016
Wasn’t “Varsham” loosely inspired by “Tezaab?”
LikeLike
hattorihanzo4784
May 4, 2016
my 2 cents about the changing masculinity topic:
There is a huge difference b/w metrosexual heroes and androgynistic heroes. The difference between them is very important to know when we are discussing about changing trends in masculinity.
Meterosexual heroes are like most of the roles Ranveer Kapoor does. In Baahubali, Prabhas might have sported a mustache but he did look like he was using the latest Phlips trimmer for the rest of his body. Thank god he was pulling, lifting, pushing heavy objects through out the movie but absolute lack of body hair did give him a metro-sexual look. Gone are the days when Sunny deol and Anil Kapoor (tarzan) were comfortable showing of their body hair. Now many leading male actors are showing bare chests. Meterosexual heroes are more low key alphas. They are alpha but they dont rub it in your face. They are almost like the prize picks among the betas. These guys go to beauty parlors and get facials and pedicures. They wear women’s clothing to dance in women’s private parties – something which would have had an emasculating effect on Sunny Deol. These guys dont mind if other guys want to dance with their girl. These guys cry too. They bawl in fact. Feminists love these guys. Liberal media projects these guys as the epitome of masculinity – Hello Beckham!!!
Androgynistic heroes are different. Their alpha status is unquestionable. Its just that they look beautiful and there is nothing they can do about it. Manga fans would be very much aware of this. Every manga series has an androgynistic badass. They have facial features finer than even the girl characters. But their badass-ery is never in question. They can annihilate an entire army. They can take down the biggest and strongest foes. This facial beauty normally gives an extra angle to these characters – they are vain. In about half of mahesh babu’s movies, heroine falls for him and he ignores her for most of the first half. Ajith has a strong manly jaw and isnt a traditionally androgynistic hero, but he is treated as one in a few movies. Tiger Shroff belongs to this category. His macho-ness is never in question. Its just that … he has a beautiful face. Androgynistic heroes have existed from a long time… Alexander… even in myths – Achilles, Nakula – Sahadeva (mahabharatha hints about their vanity caused by their beauty, though TV producers seldom cast good looking actors and normally prefer C-grade extras)
Conclusion:
1) The definition of Masculinity is changing and the metro-sexual heroes are being more accepted by the multiplex youth these days.
2) Tiger Shroff has not positioned himself with the above bunch. Androgynistic alphas have always existed since time immemorial. Its just that he is of a rare niche in the Indian cinema.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bunny
May 6, 2016
@BR: You are welcome. So, hasTiger Shroff changed the parameters of masculinity? Will Vinod Khannas and Amitabh Bachchans of the ’70s cower in front of modern Tigers?
LikeLike
priyazzillionthoughts
May 6, 2016
@BR/@Deepak: Why would anybody want to remake Varsham, NOW..after so many years?
@Bunny: Tiger replacing Vinod Khanna? Naheeen! 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Upnworld
May 7, 2016
Enjoyed reading this review. Akin to what you say about the film, your review’s second half really kicks up (though nothing wrong with the first half!) and the finishing line is true to your delightfully analytic style. The way you bring out Shroff’s unexpected shades displays why you are a class apart. Returned to your reviews after a long time, and of course you have not and will never lose your touch. Even when I disagree with you, it’s a pleasure reading your takes. Tc
LikeLiked by 1 person
rnjbond
May 15, 2016
I actually rather enjoyed this film. It was a good masala movie and very entertaining. Beyond what you’ve stated in the review, another thing I rather liked about it was that Shraddha’s character wasn’t a damsel in distress “bachao” type. She ran away from the villain and fought baddies on her own. I very much appreciated that.
Also, totally agree with you that it was silly how the film didn’t tie up the loose end of Shraddha’s father basically selling her off and betraying her.
LikeLike
Dracarys
January 14, 2017
I don’t know how I came by this article ( I know I could see the browsing history…but still)…but this cracked me up…
This is howlarious!!! 😂
Can we expect an equally howlarious article on the requisites of a typical ( mostly south) indian loosu ponnu?!
Muchas gracius! Happy Pongal!
LikeLike