Spoilers ahead…
To know the kind of filmmaker AR Murugadoss is, you only need the scene from Akira (a mostly faithful remake of the Tamil sleeper hit Mounaguru), where the victim of an acid attack sees herself in the mirror after her bandages come off. The people around her – family, friends – don’t make the slightest effort to be considerate. (I mean, they have to have an idea what she’s going to look like, no?) They scream as though they’ve set eyes on the creature from the Alien movies. The girl is distraught. She wants to die. But then, she meets other acid-attack victims. They convince her that life can (and will) go on. They smile. She smiles. The audience is invited to smile too – but I wanted to hurl. This is Murugadoss’s idea of a socially responsible, heart-warming moment. But not before impressing on us what a monster this girl now looks like, someone who, apparently, can only find acceptance amongst others like her. “Crude” doesn’t begin to describe this scene, or the decision to make a mental-asylum inmate a kinnar, a woman trapped in a man’s body. On the surface, this suggests inclusiveness. But it’s just a sensational gimmick, something to add “freshness,” because a regular female character would be soooo vanilla.
Akira comes with a socially responsible, heart-warming twist too: the protagonist is now a woman (Sonakshi Sinha). Murugadoss pads out the Tamil story to include the character’s childhood – and you can see why. No one bats an eyelid when the hero beats up a dozen opponents, but with a heroine, the director probably felt some explanation was needed. So we get Akira as a school-goer, shaped by her high-minded father (Atul Kulkarni). When she’s slapped by a rowdy, the father takes her to a martial arts class, right next to the class where other girls learn dance. Akira punches the air a few times, and she’s deemed ready to rain blows on eve-teasers and acid-attackers. The father comes off as some kind of Shaolin master, pushing his ward towards extraordinarily dangerous situations, watching her take on men twice her size, knowing full well she can handle it. And we get something that was missing in Mounaguru: a reason for the protagonist’s taciturn, almost asocial behaviour. One of the men Akira lays low has connections, and he has her sent to a correction facility for children. This sort of thing can do a number on one’s psyche.
In concept, the sex change works. For one, we get a bimbo-hero instead of a bimbette-heroine. (Amit Sadh bravely takes on what may be the most thankless role on screen this year. He doesn’t even get a duet!) And the drama is amped up too, for it’s now a woman versus four corrupt and very dangerous cops (they’ve stumbled on a big bag of cash, and there’s an incriminating video that goes missing, and they think Akira has something to do with it, and… It’s a convoluted tale, and I must say it is nice to see a non-massy Tamil movie being remade in Hindi). But Akira also battles women – a sister-in-law who doesn’t want her staying with them, and a punkette at college determined to make her life hell. But Murugadoss doesn’t do subtle psychological dimensions. He’s after in-your-face plot points, and he wants you to know you’re getting your money’s worth. The low-budget, indie vibe that contributed so much to the gritty atmosphere in the original is sacrificed for big-budget razzle-dazzle – everything looks like a set. The film is very broadly staged, like something out of the 1990s – or a TV serial of today.
The twists and turns are less interesting this time around – and I couldn’t decide if it was because I knew the story, or because things simply aren’t done as well. Take the pregnant cop (Konkona Sen Sharma). She stood out in Mounaguru because she was the sole woman in a sea of men. It was wonderful to see her plodding along, getting to the bottom of things with unglamorous detective work. But the character here isn’t as powerful, probably because Akira has already cornered the “woman-against-men” niche. Sonakshi Sinha wears a permanent scowl, and the action is too generic to make her stand out. She isn’t a character. She’s a placard that reads “Woman-centric Action Movie.” By the end, Murugadoss hilariously positions her as a Christ figure, and in case we didn’t get this from the visual of Akira and Jesus-on-the-cross in the same frame, Akira helpfully says she’s been nailed to a cross. The only juice in the film comes from Anurag Kashyap, who plays one of the cops, whose aides keep messing up. Unlike John Vijay in the Tamil version, who kept hitting the same hammy notes, Kashyap plays this villain like a father increasingly exasperated with his idiot sons. He seethes beautifully.
KEY:
- Mounaguru = see here
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
sanjana
September 3, 2016
You said similar things about hindi Ghajini also. But it went onto become superhit and a landmark film.
Afterall a review is only an opinion of an individual. Not a fact.
When you review movies remade, you start to compare and you also know the story and scenes.
Thats why I take this review with a pinch of salt.
LikeLike
Madan
September 3, 2016
“But it went onto become superhit and a landmark film.” – Never say never but the likelihood of Sonakshi Sinha delivering a superhit film on the strength of her name alone ranks about the same as Deepika Kumari living up to the hype at the Olys at least once. One’s thing for sure, she’s no Aamir Khan at the box office and her last hit at the box office was Holiday in 2014. What does work in the film’s favour is it’s contending with a Shailendra Singh-directed film (seriously!!!) and an indie film Island City.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raghunath Ramaswamy
September 4, 2016
I cannot agree with you more..
LikeLike
prasunsblog
September 4, 2016
Critic reviews are not supposed to be used to predict box office success.
You can find many examples of all combinations: movies that are liked by both critics and box office (these are rare), liked by critics and hated by audiences, or vice versa, hated by both critics and audiences
LikeLike
sanjana
September 4, 2016
No harm if I mention box-office reception and critic’s assessment of a film. Ultimately a film’s fate is decided by the audience. If a star wants to please the critic at any cost, he has to live in Mira road or Virar instead of Bandra.
A critic’s review is viewed from different angles by each reader.
LikeLike
Adithyan
September 4, 2016
You said similar things about hindi Ghajini also. But it went onto become superhit and a landmark film.
Well rangan’s reviews aren’t good these days…I still remember his review for naan rajavaga pogiren which he called as one of better masala films but the film was flop..he called dharmadurai as weak film (he conveniently overlooked the best thing in the movie which was its music and still went on saying how this could’ve been done and how that could’ve been done etc ) in his review.. But the film is now a superhit…
A review will not decide the outcome of the movie..if people decides to watch a movie and they feel movie is good for them then reviews doesn’t matter….
LikeLike
Madan
September 4, 2016
“he called dharmadurai as weak film” – Ah, poor B Rangan, being a critic is a tough job. I, like some others, did not think he was harsh enough on Vedhalam. Now that was also a hit, a pretty big one? Do people actually think only good films, good songs, good books become hits in this country? For then I’d sing to myself, “What a wonderful world!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vikram S
September 4, 2016
Hi BR, in your defence (not the you need me to defend/ respond)….also, before I say anything further…full disclosure- I don’t watch Tamil films, I read the reviews….
A film critic’s job is not to play Nostradamus about will this film be a hit or not…it’s his/ her own expression of how the film worked for him/ her…and that is also why there are no stars given to the film as part of the review.
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
September 4, 2016
I also love reviews, especially from BR whether I agree with him or not.
Reviews have become part of modern literature and there are more people who enjoy reading reviews than reading poetry or fiction.
Reviews are fun. One need not take them too seriously and try to watch a film and form one’s own view if the film stars someone like KH, Rajni, Bachchan or someone you are a fan of.
If there is a Nobel prize or Booker for film reviews, BR should get one.
If there is a film, can a review be far behind?
LikeLiked by 1 person
krishna27
September 4, 2016
I wonder if Sanjana has even seen the movie? I saw Akira on Saturday morning at a PVR IMAX theatre in Bangalore. Considering that the ticket price was an affordable 250 bucks, it was surprising to find only 6 people in the whole theatre. There is no hope in hell for this movie to become a hit. And coming from ARM, it’s a huge disappointment. Some of the scenes are outright regressive. In addition to the scenes mentioned by Rangan, Akira’s family also reacts amazingly regressively to her situation. Leave alone critics, most of the general audience would give this movie a thumbs down. And I haven’t seen Mounaguru, so my judgement isn’t clouded by any preconceived notions and expectations.
LikeLike
sanjana
September 4, 2016
I did not see the movie. I reacted to the review, not to the movie itself. Then I read hindi ghajini review. There were some similarities about the reviews not about the movies themselves. Comparison between originals and remakes.
LikeLike
KayKay
September 5, 2016
““Crude” doesn’t begin to describe this scene”
Par for the course, as ARM is a crude film maker in every sense of the word. His mysterious vault to the A-List Director Roster is a head-scratching mystery to this day. Ghajini (Tamil) was crass beyond belief and suddenly he’s helming the Hindi Remake with Amir no less? He must have his lips wrapped around some pretty influential schlongs in the biz.
Reminds me of that brief period of time when the likes of Shia Lebeouf and Orlando Bloom were headlining mega-tentpole franchises. You wonder who let these kids sit at the Big Boy’s table.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rahul
September 5, 2016
Slightly OT, but since we are talking about the commercial aspect of movies, here is an interesting article I read recently
https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/2016/08/31/bollywood-studios-economy-disney-india-utv-motion-pictures-balaji-motion-pictures-dharma-shut-down
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
September 5, 2016
Rahul: This happened in Tamil too. UTV has wound down after a series of flops. And before that, Mirchi Movies shut shop. I know a bit about the latter because I co-wrote a film they produced. It was a small rom-com with a small cast (the newly controversial Ramya is the heroine), but it became a ‘big’ movie because they overpaid everyone (except me 🙂 ) and the film became unviable. Distributors came forward to buy the film, but not at the high price Mirchi wanted. They had no clue about the production side, about the business side, about budgeting… So they closed down and the film became a tax write-off.
India is not like the US. Filmmaking (I include the attendant financial aspects) has a strong ‘local’ flavour to it, that no amount of MBA classes can prepare you for. You need instincts, a sense of what will work where…
That’s why only the homegrown companies are still standing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
venky
September 5, 2016
“I was a small rom-com with a small cast (the newly controversial Ramya is the heroine), but it became a ‘big’ movie because they overpaid everyone (except me🙂 ) ” – Use of “I” in the start – “Thotuteenga sir 🙂 . Reminds me of the scene in Iraivi where SJ Surya talks about being pregnant. Unintended delight perhaps,
Coming back to your point, this article throws a lot of insights into the points you’ve highlighted. https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/2016/08/31/bollywood-studios-economy-disney-india-utv-motion-pictures-balaji-motion-pictures-dharma-shut-down
LikeLike
Aditya (Gradwolf)
September 5, 2016
@BR: Mirchi Movies as such doesn’t exist now I gather. But is it possible to get this movie on Netflix or something?
LikeLike
Madan
September 5, 2016
Great article. Thanks for sharing, venky. Traditional production houses too make rank duds, but it is in spite of their being smart and gaming the system (including making a fool out of the corporate studios).
LikeLike
Reuben
September 6, 2016
Nolan would have cried tears of blood if he had watched Ghajini
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
September 6, 2016
Nolan’s films have set a trend. An unhealthy trend. Lapped up by some.
Hollywood and Korean films have entered Indian film industry and created desi hollywood and desi korean films. We have to purify our film industry and stick to original film making like films of 60s or films depicting stalking. Or making films from the south for bollywood.
Also we should stop wearing ties and shoes, jeans and tees. Watching us in western attire will make those westerners shed tears of blood. We should go back to hundreds of years and not make films which is also an import.
Where to draw the line?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Snehal
September 6, 2016
I don’t see the connection between the review and how well the film does. As BR has repeatedly mentioned, the review is a very personal response to the film. And the analysis or interpretation of these responses is what makes a BR review great.
LikeLike
sanjana
September 7, 2016
Critics dont respect boxoffice. They often dismiss it. And boxoffice dont respect critics. It has its own mind. Rarely they agree.
Critics view films with some expectations. They love films and so they take great pains to review films. But each critic has his or her own expectations.
Boxoffice does love films because it gives money and spin. It is the commercial meter for films. Audience also have some expectations. Some want only entertainment, Some want a good story, some want just timepass. They love cinema as a form of entertainment, not for the sake of critical points. If they get good cinema along with good entertainment, its a bonanza for them. Some films get both things in right proportions. Entertainment plus good cinema.
LikeLike
Srinivas R
September 7, 2016
Thanks Venky for sharing that link, but I think it has missed a big elephant in the room. Actor’s salary. I am quite sure Hrithik Roshan’s salary was a significant part of Mohenjadaro’s budget. The same holds true for lot of south indian movies as well. When I see a lot high budget Indian movies, I wonder where did all the money go? apparently to the star actor’s bank account
LikeLike
praneshp
September 7, 2016
@Srinivas: This might be unpopular opinion, but the way I reconcile with actors’ salary is by looking at CEO salaries. Hrithik is probably going to struggle to helm a big budget movie for the next few years, so the high salary went towards paying for that. If he was the only actor that could pull the movie off, and no one else could be hired at a lower salary, then he probably earned that.
Did you once mention that you work in the industry? Can you talk about how much of the big budget stuff is actually going into making movies, and how much is converting black money to white? When Paari Vendhar of Vendhar movies was arrested recently, I saw he was a dean or something at SRM, funded a political party, and has a movie production house. All of them reek of black money.
LikeLike
Srinivas R
September 8, 2016
@praneshp – I’m not part of the industry, though i wish I were 🙂
LikeLike
rnjbond
September 12, 2016
I tend to really enjoy your reviews… but one piece of constructive (I think) criticism — you’ve made an unfortunate habit of reviewing Hindi remakes of Tamil movies solely through the lens of a remake. In other words, the entire review of the Hindi movie is only how it compares to the original film and end up spending more time talking about the original film (in this case, Mounaguru) rather than the film you are ostensibly reviewing. In fact, you spend paragraphs on Mounaguru, with maybe ten words on Sonakshi Sinha’s performance.
You did the same with Holiday and Ghajini and it’s rather a disservice to those of us who do not regularly watch Tamil films. Because I do like your reviews a lot, I do continue to come to your website. I just wish you would review movies as movies.
Thanks and keep up the good work!
LikeLiked by 2 people