Spoilers ahead…
The most curious aspect of Sadhuram 2 is the numeral in the title, which makes you wonder about Sadhuram 1. But that film is yet to be made. We are, thus, in the realm of Limca Records. Along with astonishing Indian feats like longest ear hair and fastest sentence typed by the nose, we now have the sequel to a film that does not exist. Or maybe it does. For director Sumanth Radhakrishnan has been unequivocal about the debt his film owes to James Wan’s Saw. You may remember that charming film, which featured, among other highlights, a man hacking off his foot. Or what a young David Fincher would have called Biology class.
Sadhuram 2 is a fairly faithful remake. Two men – a doctor (Yog Japee), a photographer (Riaz) – find themselves chained to the floor of a little room painted and lit in colours that, on a shade card, would be called Algae Green and Post-Antibiotics-Urine Yellow. That rumble you hear isn’t the soundtrack. It’s your stomach getting ready to hurl. But the film isn’t pukey enough. It’s been made palatable for Indian audiences – though, thankfully, not with dream duets and a falling-in-love track. (And the running time is a brisk 94 minutes.) But in order to procure a UA rating, the gore has been vitiated. If Saw was torture porn, Sadhuram 2 is an item number. What fun is it, pray, when you get a hacking-off-a-foot scene without the blade sinking into flesh and bone and unloosing torrents of blood? It’s like a Disney movie where the cute animal sidekick has been blurred.
The back-and-forth story slowly pieces together clues and reveals why – and by whom – these men are being held captive. Cinematographer Sathish Babu does good work. There’s a tonal consistency that you rarely find in these micro-budgeted films. But despite Girishh Gopalakrishnan’s throbbing score, which allows you to experience the sensation of being trapped in the bass drum at a Megadeth performance, there is little forward momentum. Scenes exist on their own – they don’t build into a sustained queasy-making experience. The dialogues are terribly expository, and the performers appear to have trained in the Smoke Signals School of Acting. They seem to be trying to catch the attention of people on a distant hill. Also, is there no genre the Tamil filmmaker can free from moralising? We walk in for severed limbs. We walk out with sermons.
KEY:
- sadhuram = square
- Saw = see here
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2016 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
thulasidasan17
September 16, 2016
I don’t remember Saw moral sprouting. Tamil films, I guess. :p
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
September 17, 2016
👏👏👏for this review, laughed throughout the whole thing
Off topic doubt:
Sir, what exactly is the ‘vignette’ style of filmmaking, which you referred to while talking about Iruvar and Gangs of Wasseypur? How is it similar or different from the usual flashback or backstory?
LikeLike
venkatesh
September 17, 2016
Is nothing sacred any more?
LikeLike
tejas
September 17, 2016
There was Waisa bhi Hota Hai Part 2 that came before Sadhuram 2. So even that’s not original.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kid
September 17, 2016
BR:
“We are, thus, in the realm of Limca Records”
You might recall there was a film called “Waisa Bhi Hota Hai- Part 2” (the one with the “Allah Ke Bande” song) where there was no part 1- pretty good neo-noir that film was. The director of course later went onto make Quickgun Murugan and the Khoobsurat remake, all good films in their films in their note, but none of them as good as his debut
LikeLike
brangan
September 17, 2016
Er… it’s the first time in Tamil cinema? 🙂
[mutters to self: damn pedants skulking around this blog]
LikeLiked by 2 people
Govardhan Giridass
September 17, 2016
Dottore, pardon my pointless pedantry, but Kendasampige: Part 2 Ginimari Case released last year. There is no part one yet.
LikeLike
MANK
September 17, 2016
There was also krishh3 without krishh2 😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
sridharraman
September 18, 2016
But wasn’t Saw(s) also about morals? About how one doesn’t value their LIFE enough and one can truly appreciate LIFE iff you are prepared to mutilate yourself to hold on to that LIFE. I still remember the first time I saw the first Saw. Amazing experience!
LikeLike
praneshp
September 18, 2016
No Pink review?
LikeLike
KayKay
September 18, 2016
“But wasn’t Saw(s) also about morals? About how one doesn’t value their LIFE enough and one can truly appreciate LIFE iff you are prepared to mutilate yourself to hold on to that LIFE.”
Spot on, sridharraman, how did everybody miss this out?
Maybe because, unlike me, they don’t have the full 7 film Saw Collection as a box-set?
In the torture porn genre, Saw was ahead of the pack in featuring an ailing Boogeyman who croaks eventually, leaving faithful acolytes to continue his legacy. Not to mention a twisty narrative that spanned and connected across 7 movies, meaning, unlike the Freddy or Jason movies, you couldn’t just pick one installment out of sequence and watch it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
KayKay
September 18, 2016
There was also krishh3 without krishh2
Haw haw….there was also Rambo 3 without a Rambo 2 (the “2” was reserved for First Blood)
There was an Alien 3 without Alien 2 because technically, Alien 2 was called Aliens.
Christ, when did we all become such a bunch of fucking pedants?
LikeLike
KayKay
September 18, 2016
And B, does the Tamil version have a theme as cool as Charlie Clouser’s “Hello Zep”, played over every climactic reveal in every film when Jigsaw’s Grand Scheme is revealed?
LikeLike
venkatesh
September 18, 2016
@KayKay: I am with you,, The SAW films are to Torture Porn what the GodFather is to crime film.
BTW, did you know the first SAW film is actually a derivative/inspiration/stolen from a more obscure Australian slasher film that was shown at a film festival where James Wan was also present. I forget the name now , however the Australian film had the same opening sequence, the washed out colours, the concept of puzzles to be solved and an overarching mystery figure managing the whole thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Garvit Virendera Sharma
September 18, 2016
Sirjee pink review pleeease.
Dying for your take on the movie.
And I think empirically,the feminist centric opinion that there is a symbiotic relationship between movies and misogyny is being recognised more and more.Pink is nothing but a sex education movie with superb direction and performances.
Will be interesting to see how this realistic judicial melodrama registers to you.
LikeLike
brangan
September 18, 2016
sridharraman: Even Se7en, in a way, is about morals. But when you watch the film, you don’t get the feeling of being lectured at. Tamil filmmakers totally lack the ability to integrate their ‘lectures’ into the narrative. They end up sticking out. Even a movie as well-made as Joker had a laughably bad ‘morals’ scene at the end.
It’s not about WHAT the film says or does. It’s always about HOW these things are said and done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sameoldnewbie
September 18, 2016
“Also, is there no genre the Tamil filmmaker can free from moralising?”
Is that why this film is being called a ‘philanthropical thriller’ as shown at the end of the trailer there? I was (am) utterly bemused seeing the words. Google tells me this flick is crowd-funded but even so, why o why is this ‘philanthropical’? It is a word never in a million years I would have associated with ‘thriller’. Whatever next? Sympathetic slasher? Charitable crime? (Would love it if the literarily-gifted people in this forum can come up with unimaginable new genres for our indian film makers 🙂 ). Anyway, I only watched the trailer to see if they had included the foot-hacking scene (they hadn’t), and see how it compares with the ‘arm-amputation’ scene in 127 hours (which remains one of the most memorable queasy nausea-inducing scenes for me).
LikeLike
sridharraman
September 18, 2016
But when you watch the film, you don’t get the feeling of being lectured at.
brangan, I agree. But just that Saw is indeed a similar film. That’s the first thing that jumps out in neon letters when you see the movie – the whole moralising. (okay, it’s probably the first thing if one is probably used to the torture)
Not to mention a twisty narrative that spanned and connected across 7 movies
@KayKay, it is indeed a milestone set of movies! On similar lines, I thought the first Final Destination was a (kind of) pioneer, but it just petered out (even though the final part <em>spoiler alert</em> did loop back to the first movie!)
Speaking of torture porn, any Human Centipede fans in the house? [ 😛 ] While going down the wormhole that is THC and similar movies, I had to draw the line finally at a movie that even I felt queasy to attempt to watch – A Serbian Film (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film). Even reading the Wikipedia page was … !!!
LikeLike
Deepak Jeswal
September 19, 2016
MANK/KayKay : As per the logic I read somewhere, maybe on Twitter:
Koi Mil Gaya = Krishh1
Krissh = Krissh 2
Hence Krissh 3 title
I think it was Priyanka Chopra who was trying to explain this like this
😛😜😂
LikeLike
Ravi K
September 19, 2016
Sridharraman, I never saw the Human Centipede films, but I did see A Serbian Film. It’s the rare film that wasn’t released uncut in the US. I did find an uncut torrent with English subtitles, though. I know it has political/cultural allegory, but I suspect that even I fully understood it I wouldn’t have liked it any more.
I would never have imagined that it would be mentioned in the same breath as a Tamil film though!
“A Serbian Film thus became the most censored cinema release in Britain since the 1994 Indian film Nammavar that had five minutes and eight seconds of its violent content removed.”
LikeLike
Raj Balakrishnan
September 19, 2016
@Ravi K, I did see A Serbian Film. Probably one of the most disturbing films that I have seen in my life. It was gruesome, don’t know how it ever got made. There was a spanish film, Kidnapped (or some such stuff), that was pretty disturbing too.
LikeLike
hari ohm
September 19, 2016
Just saying – the first 8 minutes of waisa bhi hota hai part 2 was part 1
LikeLike