As ‘Hacksaw Ridge’ demonstrates – and ‘Rogue One’ doesn’t – clichés aren’t a problem as long as the film adds up to more.
Two questions kept running through my mind as I numbly sat through Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Is it possible, anymore, to make a Star Wars movie that truly surprises us? Or is this galactic pile of clichés intentional, a deliberate attempt to make a movie experience a McDonald’s meal? (In other words: May the formula be with you. You don’t hear anyone complaining that the Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese they had today tasted the same last week, do you?) George Lucas’s films were about characters – a farm boy who becomes the unlikely saviour of a galaxy far, far away; a good man who loved his wife so much that he lost his goodness in trying to save her. The characters in these new films are so generic, with so little that’s individual and unique, that all we register are the events around them. And these events are the same: another episode about using an older imperial craft; another rebel-base planet being blown up to demonstrate the power of the Death Star.
Take another long-running series. In the James Bond adventures, the villains are different, the locations are different, the stunts are different. In the new Star Wars movies, every villain is affiliated to the Empire and they all look the same, do the same things. In outer space, every location looks the same. (At least the Lucas films gave us gorgeous geographies, from the lava streams of Mustafar to the desert wastes of Tatooine to the silvery, wave-lashed world of Kamino). And the stunts? Dogfights and light-sabre battles – each the same as the next. The Bond action scenes, in comparison, contain everything from crocodiles to invisible cars to motorcycle leaps over whirring chopper blades. The Bond films try to make the same movie differently. The post-Lucas Star Wars instalments are content being the same film. It’s only towards the end that Rogue One acquires a smidgen of personality and emotional resonance, and even this goes back to the first Star Wars movie we ever saw. If they’re going to keep releasing one of these every year, should we stop anticipating them with a new hope?
Hacksaw Ridge, directed by Mel Gibson, is another giant vat of sameness, but the film is more than the sum of its clichés. At the beginning, we see headless corpses of soldiers set on fire, and we hear a voice reciting a passage from the Bible: “They will soar on wings like eagles…” It suggests ascendance, transcendence. This contradiction between hellish image and heavenly word is the conflict that drives the film, which tells the story of a devout Christian who volunteers to serve in the army, but without picking up a rifle. He wants to be a medic. “While everybody else is taking life, I’m going to be saving it.” This kernel of idiosyncrasy is enough to revivify the surrounding war-movie clichés, or at least help us ignore them. The film is as comforting, as invigorating as a Commando comic – which is very different from a McDonald’s meal. You know the general shape of things to come, but the specifics still have it in them to surprise.
Given the bloody nature of the battle scenes (decomposing bodies being chewed up by rats, a legless torso used as a shield), it’s easy to bring about a Saving Private Ryan comparison, but while Spielberg’s film began with carnage, showing us the kind of world in which our heroes have to carry out their mission, Hacksaw Ridge doesn’t step into war zone for almost an hour. Gibson spends time letting us know his hero (Desmond Doss, played by Andrew Garfield with the reluctant heroism that was the cornerstone of his Spider-Man). So we see Doss, his alcoholic father, his long-suffering mother, his brother, his dew-fresh girlfriend, and when he joins the army, we see his comrades, his stentorian superiors. None of these characters – taken individually – is exactly new, but together, they accomplish what the opening stretch of Saving Private Ryan did: they build a world around the protagonist, a world that’s specific to this war movie, a world that makes it slightly different from other war movies.
The Star Wars films, on the other hand, don’t bother with world-building because they assume we already know this world – but that’s like saying we know what a soldier is like, what the army is like, and so a war film can plunge us straight into battle. It’s perhaps a stretch comparing a billion-dollar franchise targeted at general audiences with a standalone adult action-drama with philosophical and theological undertones (can you serve in an army unit, which is the epitome of collective action, and still do your own thing? Would you rather listen to a silent god over the soldiers screaming around you?), but I’m just talking about clichés, about how a film can have all the must-haves of a genre and still come off like a fairly unique piece of work. To apply the principles of Hacksaw Ridge to Rogue One, what if someone from the rebel side was conflicted about killing, or if someone from the Empire wrestled with decisions about deploying the Death Star? You can still have your action-packed global blockbuster. A little human heart is all I’m asking for.
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2016 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
MANK
December 24, 2016
Mel Gibson might be the crappiest human being on earth, but I love him both in front and behind the camera. Both apocalypto and Brave heart(inspite of its stereotypes) are 2 of the best directed movies I have seen and his Martin Riggs and mad Max are unbeatable as movie icons.
As for star wars, without Lucas at the helm, I wonder whether we can even call the m SW movies anymore. They were uniquely his vision and with him gone, these are SW movies in name only
LikeLiked by 1 person
venkatesh
December 25, 2016
Wait, did i just see a camel toe in an animated movie ?
And what has that got to do with the topic at hand.
LikeLike
Jyoti S Kumar
December 25, 2016
Both Batman vs Superman and rogue nation are movies for fan boys. People whoever has been following the literature on these characters (animated books or the animated movies based on these books) are very appreciative of these movies. That the director has stuck to the originals, that they have truly understood what the fanboys really want and delivered. My husband, who loves the series was thrilled after watching this installment of the series. Maybe for them, the magic is already created in their hearts and we are just watching with our minds
LikeLiked by 2 people
KayKay
December 25, 2016
“Mel Gibson might be the crappiest human being on earth, but I love him both in front and behind the camera”
Same here! Gibson has the sort of filmography most established stars would give their left nut for!
And he’s an amazing director. From The Man Without A Face to Hacksaw Ridge, every one of his directorial efforts has displayed a keen eye for action and spectacle. He’s also an auteur in the truest sense of the word, with every one of his films being an exercise to exorcise some extremely dark and personal demons, the torture motif for one that carves a bloody swath through them all. The fact that the man is bat-shit crazy is undeniable, but Hollywood would be poorer without him.
And I love Braveheart and Apocalypto!
LikeLiked by 1 person
KayKay
December 25, 2016
“The Star Wars films, on the other hand, don’t bother with world-building because they assume we already know this world”
That’s pretty true. Star Wars has seeped into the Pop Culture idiom to such a degree that it’s got a rabid fanbase of sufficient numbers to ensure it’s global success. I’d venture to say Star Wars is a Cult Film that happens to generates blockbuster numbers.
It’s like Rajini movies, right? There’s the implicit understanding that the audience will get the “Bus Conductor” and “Paal Kaaran” references.
LikeLiked by 1 person
KayKay
December 25, 2016
Sure, it’s Disney continuing to milk the SW universe to fill it’s coffers (after all, the Billion Dollar purchase from Lucas needs a ROI right?) but I liked Rogue One for at least attempting to layer some grit and grime into the traditionally pristine landscapes of the franchise. Has a SW movie ever looked this…lived in? Dirt-encrusted Storm Trooper helmets,cities like Jedha, are burnt out, battle-scarred husks of crumbling citadels and rocky cave, boots-in-the-mud grimy battle scenes etc. We’re a long way from the opulent glitter of Coruscant
I mean, it’s like introducing overdue bills, mortgage payments and unemployment to the Karan Johar universe.
And credit Rogue One for attempting to make the most overt political statement for a SW movie yet:
A desperate battle that verges on a suicide mission, an Occupying Force strip-mining a country of sand and dessert of it’s valuable natural resource, a prisoner tortured to extract information, a Rebel alliance struggling to contain an Extremist breakaway faction armed with lethal bombs, a weapon of Mass Destruction positioned as a deterrent…..wait! This is a STAR WARS movie????
And if nothing else, Rogue One scores major points for restoring the Menace and Majesty to one Lord Vader. His final “Mass” scene reaffirms why he still remains one of Cinema’s Most Iconic Villains.
LikeLiked by 2 people
KayKay
December 25, 2016
“They were uniquely his vision and with him gone, these are SW movies in name only”
MANK, I’d argue that Lucas started pissing on his own vision long before the sale to Disney.
I mean. do the prequel trilogy even look and feel like they were made by the same man who directed A New Hope?
Lucas took a couple of throwaway lines by Obi-Wan in Ep. 4 & 5 about the “Clone Wars” and “Anakin joining the Dark Side” and expanded it into 3 movies with cringeworthy dialogues, leaden pacing (Ep. 2 especially), offensive racial caricaturing and egregious miscasting ( Jake Lloyd and Hayden Christiansen becoming the terrifying Darth Vader would only ever work as a spoof. At least Mel Brooks had the decency to put Rick Moranis inside the helmet and call it Spaceballs).
3 movies yielded only ONE hour of watchable material for me, coming at the tail end of Revenge of The SIth. It could boast of only ONE scene of grand operatic grandeur, paralleling the birth of Luke and Leia to the re-birth of Anakin. Which Lucas then proceeds to ruin with Vader’s ultra-emo “Little Girl Whine” moment (albeit a little girl with an amazing baritone).
Sorry, but even Lucas couldn’t make a decent SW movie in the end. And ironically, it’s fan boys like J J Abrams and Gareth Edwards that recognize what worked with the original trilogy and are keeping the flames of those original vision alive.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Aditya (Gradwolf)
December 25, 2016
I enjoyed Rogue One during its run but when you sit back and think about it, the questions you ask do rankle. Did you watch Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them? I was wondering how you missed a piece on it as you’ve given one for almost every installment, even the books! Now that film I loved to bits. It’s a familiar world and yet lots of new things to savor – set Potter’s wizarding world in USA. A complete new story arc and characters and insert enough easter eggs for the fanboys. It’s both good news and bad news that they have 3 or 4 more films coming – JKR has done a pretty fine job with the screenplay here. Hope they have enough juice.
LikeLike
Aditya (Gradwolf)
December 25, 2016
Not to mention, the film(s) is from David Yates – who gave the great Deathly Hallows Part 1, the only film after Azkaban to experiment with form.
LikeLike
brangan
December 25, 2016
Gradwolf: I loved loved loved Fantastic Beasts. Now there’s a film that takes a familiar universe and finds fantastic new things to do in it.
PS: What do you refer to when you mean experiment with form? The Yates films are exceptionally well made and there are nice bits like the puppets and shadow theatre, but I don’t recall any formal “experimentation” as such. But then, it’s been a while since I saw them…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Aditya (Gradwolf)
December 25, 2016
It’s not experimentation in the extent of what Cuaron did with changing the whole landscape and look and feel of the series with the third film. But there are great uses of locations, silences and mood building throughout the film (everyone is fighting inner demons and feeling the pressure of finding the Horcruxes and there are lengthy portions where absolutely nothing happens). As in Part 1 is really the most atmospheric of all the films. Like how the book is detailed in the three finding themselves all alone and then Ron leaves too with many days passing in absolute drudgery. This was well realized in Part 1, where relative to Part 2, there is very little “action”. And like you mention, the history lessons packaged as shadow/animated theatre etc and also that melancholic moment of Harry and Hermione dancing alone, trying to spruce things up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anuja Chandramouli
December 25, 2016
People always wonder if I have escaped from an institution for the non – criminally insane when I say this but the thing is (deep breath) I really really love the Star Wars prequel trilogy. All I remember of the original is my cousin brothers watching the damn things endlessly while I tried to figure what it was they saw in it. As a kid, I found Chewbacca horribly annoying and was too young to appreciate the handsomeness of Han Solo. As for Jabba the hut, he was so revolting and creeped me out so badly, I refused to watch the rest of if and left in a huff much to the fanboys delight.
But the sequel was another matter altogether. I thought Phantom Menace was all kinds of awesome despite the abomination that was Jar Jar Binks. Liam Neeson (God bless you Qui Jon), Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman turned in riveting performances. Loved the ubercharged pod – racing sequence, the sheer coolth of that Darth Maul with his wicked double sided light saber, plus Samuel L J as a badass Mace Windu. And how can anyone resist Yoda? I just wanna carry him around in my pocket all day…
Attack of the Clones did have a leaden pace as KayKay pointed out with his typical rapier like wit but it did lay the groundwork for the phenomenal third installment. The tragic, doomed love between Padme and Anakin ( I wept like a baby when he uses his awful telekinetic chokehold on his beloved), deadly duel between master and apprentice, the tragic slaughter of the Jedi and the younglings at the hideous Palpatine’s instigation, Yoda’s kickassness (okay I made up that word), it had everything man!! So sue me, I can watch it again and again and again!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Kay
December 25, 2016
Fantastic beasts is a treat to the HP fans. I was clapping and jumping and trying to wolf whistle throughout the movie so much so that, few teens sitting next to me gave me this ‘this Aunty has gone crazy’ look. And toward the end, when all the destruction of the buildings happen, I expected that all the wizards and witches would get together to put them back together and I was prepared for it but even then my throat constricted and I might have shed a tear or two. It was so similar to the teachers defying Voldemort and putting up a defense in the last HP movie. Can’t wait for the rest of the movies.
And this reminds me, is there anyone from U.K. here, who has watched HP and the cursed child play?
BR, it would be really great if you could write a post a on Fantastic beasts.
LikeLike
chronophlogiston
December 26, 2016
I was trying to figure out where you were going with this, but your closing statement about what could have been added to Rogue One nailed it. I haven’t seen the film yet, but totally understand what you mean.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
December 28, 2016
It seems apt to post it here: Carrie Fisher died today. RIP Princess Leia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sravishanker1401gmailcom
December 28, 2016
Its impossible to describe the feeling of wonder when seeing Star wars – A New Hope for the first time as a eleven year old. Especially the holographic image of Princess Leia projected from R2D2.
R.I.P dear princess ! (sigh)
https://thezolazone.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/r-i-p-carrie-fisher-princess-leia/
LikeLike
karzzexped
December 29, 2016
BR, Seriously off topic, but curious to know if you are going to review the recently released “Dhuruvangal Pathinaaru” ?
LikeLike
Arun
December 31, 2016
I guess Captain America Films and to an Extent all Marvel Films Including the Superb R Rated Deadpool has human heart in it. As far as Star Wars..I simply cannot connect with any of the movies except the master piece “Empire Strikes back”..The light saber fights reminds me of Old MGR movies where MGR takes on the likes of P.S.Veerapa,M.N.Nambiar with his sword skills and even those fights are superbly choreographed than these inflated, bloated, Over budgeted Spectacles.
LikeLike
Deepak
January 2, 2017
Happy New Year everybody!
Now the first time I saw Rogue One I recall being strangely unmoved by the whole experience, just as I was with Gareth Edwards’ previous movie, Godzilla. This was a series first. The original trilogy was obviously awesome, the prequels deserved the near universal hate that they received, and Awakens was exactly the shot in the arm the franchise needed (despite being quite similar to New Hope). This though, it was..unnecessary. Sure you now know why was there such a flaw in the Death star, but was that really a detail that we “had to, had to” know? It also makes it even more egregious that said flaw was allowed to remain in the second death star as well. If the empire had a decent project manager s/he would’ve immediately done a “5-why” or a Fishbone to figure out how the Death star got destroyed and ensured the flaw wouldn’t remain. Plus, as Mon Mothma revelas in Return of the Jedi that “too many bothans died to get us this information”, it’s the same Death star! Or maybe unlike the Empire, the Rebel Alliance had too many project managers who wanted to “reconfirm” the intelligence, leading to the deaths of the Bothans?
Anyway, I digress. I warmed up a bit more to Rogue One during my second viewing and I at least had fun with some of the characters like Donnie Yen’s Chirrut Imwe, and the most sarcastic droid in the Star Wars universe, K2-SO played marvelously by Alan Tudyk. The main characters, unfortunately remained bland and not really worth the screen time they got. And the less said about Forrest Whitaker’s hamming, the better. Did he think he was in a Shakesperean drama – the way he put the emphasis on the words “you” and “me” in the dialogue “did they send you here, to kill me?” – horrendous! His whole character arc could have been easily cut out from the movie with hardly any mention of it and the movie would have been better for it. And that “pookalet or whatever it’s name was” creature? What did it exactly do? Reconfirm (there’s that word again) Bodhi’s freely volunteered information? And wasn’t Bodhi supposed to lose his mind after a session with pookalet? Yet he was fine after being shook twice? So why did they really waste so much money ona creature that accomplished nothing? I guess these are all places which got reshot and they had to make the story work with whatever they had.
—-Spoiler alert begins—-
The Tarkin cameo with a fully CGI Peter Cushing was done well at a technical level, but his skin tone was very waxy compared to the real-life actors which I felt stood out horribly
The Leia CGI was straight out of the Starwars Battlefront game so less said about that the better.
—-Spoiler alert ends—–
In final analysis, the only good things about this movie were some of the side characters like Chirrut Imwe, K2-SO, and the Vader cameo where he shows everyone why it is that a grandson who has never met him idolizes him and wants a return of the Dark side.
Hoping for part 8 to be a return to form for the series.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jim Gordon
January 29, 2017
I liked it because now I can agree with people saying Vader is a formidable villain. He looked and sounded like an idiot in the originals.
LikeLike