Spoilers ahead…
The Tamil film Kaththi opens in the middle of a chase outside a prison. We see a group of policemen, apparently firing at will. We see the back of a fleeing convict – the whistles in the theatre tell us it is the film’s star, Vijay. An instant later, this is confirmed with a frontal shot. We see the actor running towards the camera, towards the screen, towards his… fans. It’s a “mass” opening, all right, but it’s nothing compared to the way Chiranjeevi is introduced in the Telugu remake, Khaidi No. 150. When it’s time to reveal his face, the star smiles, the frame freezes. Two slo-mo bullets zing past his ears on either side, leaving behind a Matrix-y wake. The words MEGA STAR appear on screen. In other words, time stands still. The story cannot go on without first acknowledging the star.
Especially when the star is making a comeback after a decade. Like all “mass” films, Khaidi No. 150 is less a piece of cinema, more a conversation between a star and his fans. The number in the title isn’t just about the number on the convict’s uniform. This is Chiranjeevi’s 150th film. He plays two roles. He’s a thief named Kaththi Seenu. (That’s who we see in the early portions.) And he’s a hydrologist named Sankar, who’s helping farmers find water. When asked his name, Sankar replies, “Konidela Siva Sankara Vara Prasad.” That’s Chiranjeevi’s real name. (I’d love to have reported what happens in the next minute, but my ears were still ringing from the screams in the theatre.) And the star reconfigures his signature dance moves. This is less about Chiranjeevi giving a performance than saying “I still got it.” And he has got it. The actor must be the youngest-looking 61-year-old in the movies. There’s not a line on his face. His frame is stockier than that of today’s heroes, but he moves beautifully. When I heard he was paired opposite Kajal Agarwal, who has acted in five films as his son’s heroine, I thought it was creepy. But it doesn’t look that way at all. Or at least, it’s only mildly creepy.
The director, VV Vinayak, has reshaped Kaththi – a star vehicle, plus a social-message movie – into a purer star vehicle. Khaidi No. 150 is less self-important, and therefore more palatable. The story is still the same. And if you’ve seen Kaththi, the emotional highs are still the same – for instance, in the flashback that details Sankar’s work. The bigger social moments are still there, like the visuals that show farmers reduced to cleaning manholes and serving liquor in faraway cities. (As in Kaththi, there is a bit of romanticising of the farmer’s way of life.) But there’s a comedy track with Brahmanandam. And when push comes to shove, Seenu zips away to a foreign location to shake a leg. There’s a song even during the most dramatic part of the film, when Seenu and the farmers step into water conduits serving the city and create a drought-like situation so others can feel their plight. Suddenly, we cut to an insanely catchy Devi Sri Prasad number (Ammadu, let’s do kummudu) that starts with “Yo guys, this is not a mass song, this is the Boss song.” The Boss’s son, Ram Charan, pops in for a few minutes. For five glitzy minutes, those farmers squatting in those pipes are a distant memory. The audience is too busy doing kummudu.
But these interruptions puncture the bloat. We’re constantly being reminded to take things less seriously. Unless we aren’t. Consider the film’s closing portions, the fight at the climax, where the washed-out North Indian-looking villain is killed. (He’s responsible for the suicide of six farmers.) In Kaththi, Vijay merely impales him on a wheel. In this version, Chiranjeevi lifts a plough and sinks its tilling end into the villain’s flanks. The man’s death in Kaththi was merely moral. He did bad things. He had to die. The man’s death in Khaidi No. 150 is mythical. He did bad things to farmers. His death has to come by means of a farming implement. And what about the famous coin fight? In Kaththi, Vijay is found sitting on a pile of goons he’s beaten to a pulp. In Khaidi No. 150, that pile of bodies looks like a small mountain. In Telugu cinema, size clearly matters.
KEY:
- Kaththi = see here
Copyright ©2017 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
praneshp
January 11, 2017
Ha, this was running in escape when I went to watch Kirik Party, and the crowd was crazy. Now I know why, looks like Mega Star has had a decent comeback.
LikeLike
sid
January 11, 2017
i heard rathnavelu is the cinematographer in this remake. how did he capture the tunnel scene? did he just redo george c williams’s genius or did he do something better.. just curious 😋
LikeLike
Praneeth Bharadwaj
January 11, 2017
BR i am really surprised that you are writing review for this film. Anyways,i feel there is nothing wrong in making a ‘fakt’ mass film but it has to make some sense. If the film is trying address the problems of farmers what’s the point if the audience are not emotionally invested even for that micro-second. That’s where i feel most of the “commercial” films go wrong-not able to absorb the audience in that high even for a second. However this film might prove to be a paisa-vasool(definitely for producers though).And yeah.. Chiru’s son charan has killed as many as 100 in his 2nd film magadheera.. so the father has to kill atleast 150.. atleast in his 150th film..:):)
LikeLike
V
January 11, 2017
Now that’s not just a palatable review, but a delectable one too.
Most non-Telegu reviewers dont get the ‘fun’da of Telegu movies right. Great to see that you have the right mindset for such movies.
(From a tamizh viewer who watches Telegu for its flamboyance and production values)
LikeLike
Bot
January 11, 2017
surprised and happy that you reviewed it.
The audience is busy doing kummudu. Lol
I think the phrase ‘ammudu, let’s do kummudu’ has a double meaning, that you’re not aware of.
LikeLike
brangan
January 11, 2017
Praneeth Bharadwaj: If the film is trying address the problems of farmers what’s the point if the audience are not emotionally…
I don’t don’t think this film (or Kaththi, for that matter) is trying to “address” any problem. These problems are merely hooks to show the hero as a do-gooder, which has been the hero-template since the MGR days.
LikeLiked by 5 people
MANK
January 11, 2017
it seems that you enjoyed the film quite a lot 🙂 I did enjoy Kaththi, even though i did feel (same as you) that it was rather needlessly self serious and self important, but it had some great masala moments and it was a pleasure to watch a plot driven masala film unlike the usual ajith vijay starrers. i know what chiranjeevi and the makers where going to do to this film keeping in mind (or even otherwise) that it is his 150th film. so i wasnt keen on watching this one. i wouldn’t say i am a fan of chiranjeevi, i am a tremendous fan of his dancing and dont think there has ever been a better dancer on indian screen. but i dont find his screen presence as charismatic or powerful as Rajnikanth and find him a very limited performer regards to drama or comedy.
Telugu cinema does make these hyperbolic star driven masala crowd pleasers much better than anybody. the original mahesh babu starrer Pokkiri is way better than any of its remakes. And then there was Bahubali. but the problem is that telugu cinema has no existence beyond that. forget multiplex movies or indie movies, they dont even make a more traditional rooted masala film like sethupathi, saamy or Dabbang. the masala is purely driven by the over exaggerated characterizations and gesticulation of the lead star.
LikeLike
Thulasiram Thota
January 11, 2017
Hi Mank, I think you have not seen Chiranjeevi’s other movies (Aapadbandavudu, Swayamkrushi, Sneham Kosam, Rudraveena and few others) where he performs and excels at it. But, unfortunately those movies did not fare well as we telugu audience wont like to see him in a de-glamorized role. He is not limited to comedy and dances. If he was he wouldn’t have become a Mega star where zillions follow him.
Coming to this movie it is his comeback film and as BR said it is made for Chiranjeevi to communicate with fans and he want to do only commercial movie and having a social message in the story is added bonus. Anyway fans are super excited and collections on 1st proves how much telugu audience missed him over these years.
LikeLike
Rajesh
January 11, 2017
“In Telugu cinema, size clearly matters.” is it double meaning
LikeLike
Arjun J
January 11, 2017
“The actor must be the youngest-looking 61-year-old in the movies.”
I disagree. There is Mammootty ryt?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bot
January 11, 2017
Mank: There was a good new age film called pelli choopulu ,that I enjoyed a lot. Try it. It isn’t great, there is some very good writing in it.
Rajamouli’s earlier masala films are very much earthy. There are a lot of masala films that I feel are very much rooted. Take Mahesh Babu’s athadu for instance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
rey1294
January 11, 2017
I know what you are trying to say, but it is self-important in its own way and that is selling the star. There are even references to his political career. This is a movie all about Chiranjeevi. I know that is usually how it is for star driven films, but this one seems to be even more the case due to it being his 150th film. In addition, while you felt the abundance of these commercial elements make the movie an easier watch, I felt that they were trying too hard to appease every type of cinemagoer. Dedicating so much time to comedy sketches (especially when they are past the point of being funny) can get quite tiresome.
LikeLike
Gowri Shankar Chalat
January 12, 2017
Nice to see you reviewing a Telugu film. BTW today balakrishna’s 100th film is releasing. Its a historical film on Legendary emperor Gautamiputra Satakarni. Do check it out.
LikeLike
Honest Raj (formerly 'V'enkatesh)
January 12, 2017
ARM should thank these guys for making his films look like ‘masterpieces’. Hope you don’t bring the ‘gravity’ references up when you review our mass hero films. 🙂
The first half of the title – Khaidi – is the namesake film that catapulted Chiranjeevi to stardom.
Agree with Arjun J that Mammootty looks way younger. Chiranjeevi developed jowls as far as back in 2010!
I’ve liked him in his earlier films; he would mostly play negative characters (the playboy ones for instance). KB utilised him well in his Telugu films. Even at this age, there are shades of villainy in his face. My favourite film of his has to be Punnami Naagu where he played a human-snake.
LikeLike
Yuvaraj Jeyasankar
January 12, 2017
In Kaththi, Vijay is found sitting on a pile of goons he’s beaten to a pulp. In Khaidi No. 150, that pile of bodies looks like a small mountain
Just reminded me of the dialogue from the film Payanam.. ‘puthusa vara pasangalaan 30 paera adikuraanga..Naan oru 300 paerayavadhu adikka venaam’
LikeLike
venkatesh
January 12, 2017
Boy does this guy dance and a proper Masala film.
Welcome back Chiru.
LikeLike
guru narayan
January 12, 2017
great review…
The placement of songs has always been weird with telugu “mass” movies (Actually, all “mass” movies), but this kummudu song placement was the weirdest ever!
loved your line – “The audience is too busy doing kummudu.” ROFL
One kannada movie and telegu movie reviewed this week… Please review a malayalam movie also to complete the cycle.
P.S – have been following your blog for years, but commenting for the first time. hopeully will become a regular “commenter” soon.
Cheers
LikeLike
Siddharth Subha Venkat
January 12, 2017
“Khaidi No. 150 is less self-important, and therefore more palatable.”
How, if I may ask! I can’t see a single sentence in this review justifying this line!
LikeLike
MANK
January 12, 2017
Bot, i liked Athadu and there was the brilliant Okkadu before that.i liked Khaleja also quite a lot. Mahesh is the only top star who try to do different things and i like him a lot as a performer. but even he has succumbed to hyperbole of late like Dookhudu and Aagadu. his latest Brahmotsavam was a hyperbolic film of a different kind 🙂 such a boring mess of a film.well keeping fingers crossed for his next with Murugadoss
LikeLike
MANK
January 12, 2017
Honest Raj, yes he was pretty good in KB’s 47 natkal opposite jayapradha. Also he made a great villain opposite rajni in Ranuva veeran. the climax fight between them is great. you can see how agile and athletic he is and that spark is there which would later take him to mega stardom
LikeLike
Honest Raj (formerly 'V'enkatesh)
January 12, 2017
MANK: True that! He mastered the ‘how-to-win-a-fight-with-one-leg-kick’ technique much before our captain did. However, it was popularised by the latter. But that’s a different story. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nirmal
January 13, 2017
There is song when they are in he water tunnel in the Tamil version as well but it was removed after first few shows
LikeLike
arvindkrish
January 13, 2017
The Tamil film Kaththi opens in the middle of a chase outside a prison. We see a group of policemen, apparently firing at will. We see the back of a fleeing convict – the whistles in the theatre tell us it is the film’s star, Vijay. An instant later, this is confirmed with a frontal shot <<<
You have forgotten the fact that the police were not chasing Vijay but Vijay was helping them in catch a convict who had escaped. In that case why will police shoot Vijay. Such is the level of journalism and reviews when it comes to Vijay movies. This is what happens when brain and ass exchange their spots, u get all shitty reviews 😊
LikeLike
brangan
January 13, 2017
arvindkrish: Er, where am I saying police are shooting Vijay?
So you took:
“a group of policemen, apparently firing at will” + “We see the back of a fleeing convict” and made it = police are shooting at Vijay?
Such is the level of comprehension when it comes to fans. This is what happens when brain and ass exchange their spots, u get all shitty comments 🙂
LikeLiked by 9 people
Vikas Raj
January 13, 2017
I have not seen you reviewing a Telugu film before, Was it because it was Chiranjeevi’s comeback film or was it because it was a remake of Kaththi?
LikeLike
shaviswa
January 13, 2017
<<>>>
Oh my God!!! That was given back with some vengeance BR !!!! 😀
LikeLike
Madan
January 14, 2017
Bwahaha, that was badass from Baddy, and well deserved too, if I may.
LikeLike
Meghnath
January 14, 2017
Don’t you think having needlessly choreographed songs spoil the flow of the film ? How does it make it better than Kaththi ?For all it’s problems I thought Kaththi managed to have a focus on the issue at hand apart from the “selfie pulla” song which came in quite early in the 2nd half. Post that, the mood was maintained throughout till the climax.
Wanted to know your thoughts on this one..
LikeLike
Srinivasa Yoganada Rao Netrakanti
January 15, 2017
First time to read a review of aTelugu film from Bhardwaj Rangan. The analysis is unbiased and reflective for those who have seen the film and the original in Tamil. The words ‘ammadu’ means a young girl and ‘kummudu’ means attack violently with fists Let us not be tempted to read to reach into the meaning as if these words ‘double meaning’ Both actors did justice to their roles none of heroes-Vijay and Chiranjeevi- did justice to the roles. each has their distinctive style of action, diction and dance. One need not look at the both movies as a comparison or even contrast. Both movies have been successful in the respective states.
LikeLike
praneshp
January 16, 2017
Terror @brangan! especially the smiley at the end 🙂
LikeLike