Spoilers ahead…
While discussing filmmakers who begin with a bang, we usually talk about a “sophomore slump”. But is there a term for the opposite, when a Krishna bounces back with Nedunchaalai after debuting with the soggy Sillunu Oru Kaadhal, or when Lakshman follows up the awful Romeo Juliet with Bogan?
The beginning isn’t promising: a romance between Mahalakshmi Azhagamperumal (Hansika Motwani) and Vikram (Jayam Ravi). Bogan does away with a comedy track, but who needs one when Hansika is on screen? Note the name of the character. It’s practically a neon sign that, contrary to evidence, this is a Tamil girl. But when we first see her, she’s doing something good Tamil girls don’t do, at least not on screen. She gets drunk. Now, given the “bubbly” roles this actress usually plays, there’s always the suspicion that someone slipped a teaspoon of a psychotropic substance into her morning coffee, but things are slightly different here. She affects a slur, a childish drawl. She sways a little. Naturally, Vikram falls for her instantly.
Luckily, half an hour later, Aditya (Arvind Swamy) re-enters the picture and saves it. We first saw him in a sort of prologue, where his evilness was established by his participation in an orgy. He wakes up, and he’s surrounded by sleeping blondes and brunettes – one of them is using his unmentionables as a pillow. (The title song describes him as “mutham thuppum dragon” – a dragon that spits out kisses.”) And he returns when the eminently fast-forwardable romance is shoved aside for the plot about Aditya’s unconventional heists.
Turning bad may be the best career decision Arvind Swamy made. In his heydays as hero, he was blandly handsome, a not-bad performer – but something was always missing, and now, after Thani Oruvan and Bogan, we are able to put a finger on what it was. Edge, charisma – he’s got that now. He owns the screen. He hams gloriously as the villain, especially in a pre-interval interrogation scene where he calls a female cop machan and keeps tossing kinky asides in her direction, even as he threatens a male cop with a gruesome death. Jayam Ravi – who’s got one note in his repertoire, earnestness – pales in comparison.
Especially when he attempts to emulate Arvind Swamy’s swagger. This plot twist looks towards the fantastically trashy Face/Off, where cop and criminal switch places. But Bogan isn’t nearly as fantastic, or trashy. It’s perfectly watchable, but I wish the villain had been more than just someone who steals cash from local banks and jewellery showrooms. He needed to be mythic, especially given the manner in which he goes about his villainy. Nasser, who plays an archaeologist, says as much: had he had this power, he’d have switched places with the American President and ruled the world. They should release this film with subtitles in the US, whose citizens, right now, are sorely in need of wish-fulfilment.
There’s no character development (precious little is done with Aditya’s background as a prince), and pace is generated more through flashy editing (Anthony) and Imman’s background score rather than the writing – Vikram’s apprehension of Aditya is laughably simplistic. But the film looks grand, and it gets better as it goes along. As popcorn thrillers go, you could do worse.
KEY:
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2017 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
First_Timer
February 2, 2017
Believe the key given is wrong.
Haven’t watched face/off simply coz I wanted to see what Aravind Swamy could do. Seems like I made the right decision.
LikeLike
Dracarys
February 2, 2017
@First_Timer seriously? You waited 20 years to wait face/off just to see what Arvind Swamy can do….In 2017???? Wow!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Honest Raj (formerly 'V'enkatesh)
February 2, 2017
machan = bro!
Huh?
LikeLiked by 4 people
MANK
February 2, 2017
Bogan does away with a comedy track, but who needs one when Hansika is on screen
🙂 Righto.
From the trailers , i had a feeling that this was going to be a shameless rehash of Thani Oruvan. glad to hear you found some merits in the picture.
Btw , how about the ‘Filmmaking’ ?, is it solid, craftwise? that was one of the problems i had with Thani Oruvan. the making was rather poor, it could have been so much better. it was the novelty of the subject matter and AS’s super performance that made it a cut above the rest.
LikeLike
MANK
February 2, 2017
OT:, Brangan, i remember you writing a piece on metrosexualisation of the muscle where you contrasted Hrithik’s abs with Ajith’s paunch. well it seems that you will have to retract that 🙂
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/vivegam-first-look-ajith-kumar-dhanush-rana-daggubati/1/872795.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
February 2, 2017
They should release this film with subtitles in the US, whose citizens, right now, are sorely in need of wish-fulfilment.
Oh, boy! Are we! 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
sravishanker1401gmailcom
February 2, 2017
What a comeback for Arvind Swamy.
I guess everyone has their own time zone.
His cycle appears to have gone Bang-Whimper-Back to Bang
LikeLike
Srinivas R
February 3, 2017
MANK, that Ajith poster looks totally fake to me. The movie will surely be as bad as veeram or vedalam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ravi K
February 3, 2017
Hansika playing a character named Mahalakshmi Azhagamperumal is funnier than any comedy track could ever be.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anisha
February 3, 2017
Hansika Motwani playing a Mahalakshmi Azhagamperumal? Lemme guess, lip sync must’ve still been Thakita Thadimi…
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
February 3, 2017
MANK: The film looks rich and glossy, which is itself some kind of relief. But no. There’s nothing interesting otherwise. There was one Hitchcockian shot that intrigued me, a tracking movement on the first floor of a house, around a staircase — pretty much like the one in Psycho. But it was one of those flatter-to-deceive thingees 😊
LikeLike
Anuja Chandramouli
February 3, 2017
Damn! Bogan was a thoroughly disappointing film for me. The only thing it had going for it was Aravind Swamy who is looking dishy as ever and has charisma enough for himself and every leading man in Tinseltown. Let’s not forget da man has some serious swag and if that were not enough he can act his pants off!!
The film itself though is every kind of awful. Starting with Hansika. The woman sent my gag reflex into a tizzy every time she showed up onscreen with her baby doll talk and maddeningly insipid ways. I long for the day when her species becomes blessedly extinct.
Jayam Ravi tries hard to match up to Aravind Swamy, in his new avatar as a powerhouse performer/badass but his game effort notwithstanding he just can’t cut it. And that is bad news in a film where he literally is in Swamy’s shoes for the better part of the second half and things go steadily downhill from there.
All in all Bogan has given me a fresh sense of appreciation for Jayam Raja and Thani Oruvan (I liked the film though it was hard not to nitpick). At least the leading lady was not a loosu ponnu.
Now if only the powers that be would cast Rajinikanth and Aravind Swamy together… And hire someone who knows something about putting together a brilliant script…Sighs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Srinivas R
February 3, 2017
+1 to Anuja, mainly for Rajinikanth and Arvind Swamy idea, that sounds tasty.
LikeLike
Subhash
February 3, 2017
Rajinikanth and Arvind again…. a film can be made by tying up the loose ends in Thalapathi. Or, how about bringing Thyagu back after all these years?
LikeLike
lowlylaureate
February 3, 2017
BR and Buddies!
The FRS of Bogan is here:
Thanks
LikeLike
brangan
February 3, 2017
Thanks for the link, circusthuppakki.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nilosh Moorthi (@NilFBosh)
February 4, 2017
Also it’s worth noting that the director initially wanted Vijay Sethupathy to play Arvind Swamy’s role but Jayam Ravi recommended that the role go to Arvind Swamy. If VJS was in the movie that it would be a whole different ball game,
LikeLike
Ramchander Krishna (@ramctheatheist)
February 7, 2017
It’s funny how in Tamil cinema special powers are almost always used by the hero or the villain to “correct pannify” the heroine. Take the power of invisibility in Jithan. Or the time machine in Netru Indru Naalai. Or the time freeze in 24. Or whenever there’s double action and the villain’s in the hero’s place, as demonstrated in Vaali. While it’s understandable that the villain is tempted, the script writer is tempted even more to write such scenes. Maybe we should blame Indra for this. Stupid guy couldn’t control himself over Ahalya.
It’s funnier to see how the script writer sweats it out to ensure the heroine isn’t “mudichufied” in such scenarios. The villain will try to take advantage of her but somehow she should escape. There was a Nagma and Napolean film “Maya” that had similar transmigration of souls. Once the villain was in Napolean’s body he’ll try to “mudichufy” Nagma but of course she’ll push him aside saying she’s on Sai Baba viradham or something. In Bogan, the moment Arvind Swamy and Hansika are in bed and a song began to play, the guy in the next seat almost jumped up in shock “Mudishtaanaa?” I asked him to wait until the song was over and as expected it was a dream. Also, the script writer works in a “funny” kick to the balls to ensure that the villain’s subsequent attempts to “mudichify” the heroine are foiled. Because you see if she’s mudichified then she’ll become like Ahalya. And that’s not good.
Even the intro scene with a drunk Hansika are given so many disclaimers. It was her first time. And that too she drank only because she doesn’t want to marry the guy. Otherwise she won’t drink. It just keeps getting funny. Mainstream films are far-fetched from reality in terms of logic but they mirror the prevalent deep-rooted social perceptions. It’s very nice to sit in theatre and ogle at Tamil culture that will present to you close-ups of Hansika’s curves and yet claim that they’re meant only for Jayam Ravi to see.
LikeLiked by 5 people
brangan
February 7, 2017
Ramchander Krishna (@ramctheatheist) It’s very nice to sit in theatre and ogle at Tamil culture that will present to you close-ups of Hansika’s curves and yet claim that they’re meant only for Jayam Ravi to see.
Haha.
Wrote about this in a piece on Singam:
“If he tears apart a villain who besmirches womanhood, stripping off a girl’s dupatta, it’s because it’s his girlfriend who’s at the receiving end. (Of course, after this act of gallantry, she repays him by jiggling about in a bikini top, rendering utterly meaningless her apparent shame upon being deprived of that dupatta. Then again, this display is solely for the hero, on screen, and all of Tamil Nadu off of it.) ”
LikeLiked by 4 people
Rahini David
February 7, 2017
Ramchander Krishna: Loved the comment on mudichufying and saibaba virathams and dreams. ALL of them are my favorite topics.
LikeLike
Nishanth Krishnan
February 7, 2017
Ramchander Krishna – BANG ON! The entire set piece was disgusting to watch. Trust a better writer to make arvind swamy (in jayam ravi’s body) mudichify hansika and make hansika fall for both jayam ravi in arvind swamy body and arvind swamy in jayam ravi body… around 30 mins before the movie ends, this better writer would have made arvind swamy and jayam ravi reswap the souls only to find that hansika also likes jayam ravi in jayam ravi body and arvind swamy in arvind swamy body.
Bardarji Sadi
Sardarji Body
LikeLiked by 2 people
Amit Joki
February 7, 2017
Had I been the director, I would have let Aravind in Jayam’s body to seduce and mudichify Hansika and at a later point of time, when the real Jayam mudichifies her, for the first time, I would have Hansika say,
“Pona performance nalla irunchu, ippa bland a iruku”
Then it would dawn on the real Jayam Ravi.
Smiles sinisterly
LikeLike
sachita
February 14, 2017
” the guy in the next seat almost jumped up in shock “Mudishtaanaa?”” oh god that got me lol
Thanks.
Also I wonder if this was his first tamil/indian movie. One gets attuned to what will happen and what wont happen on screen.
I remember watching titanic with classmates and they wondered if rose was going to tell her grand daughter that she was dicaprio’s grand daughter. Now that would happen in tamil movie.
LikeLike
brangan
June 30, 2023
I got an interview request for Hansika…
Should I? Should I? Should I?
LikeLiked by 2 people
lakshmi
June 30, 2023
😀
Sidebar: Whats wrong with covering Hansika Madams Birthday , idhe ellam oru kelvi aa ? udane pant shirt mattindu poga venamo ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
hari prasad
June 30, 2023
You should definitely bring that “almost interviewing her in the birthday party” incident up.
It would be the 2023 version of the wholesome story that you told Amala on how you sighted her.
And look at you man after a decade , you’ve become so popular than Hansika was ever at her peak doing those Sundar C movies and getting branded as the Khushboo of this generation.
LikeLike
Voldemort
June 30, 2023
Is Hansika even acting nowadays? Don’t remember seeing her in anything lately. Maybe your interview will give her the much needed coverage. You could also apologize for not making it to her birthday party 🙂
LikeLike
Jeeva Pitchaimani
June 30, 2023
@rangan
I think it might be an interview of Rangan done by Hansika. She is the most trolled actor by Rangan ever. She might have a field day drilling Rangan like how ED drilled Senthil Balaji for calling her a “fish gasping for air” while she tries to speak tamil. ‘Alabaster automatons’, you have tons of references like these that must make Rangan reach for his glass of water.
LikeLike
mvky
June 30, 2023
Should I repeated 3 times may become as famous as To be or not To be. Accept it as a challenge. Or recuse yourself like some judges do in some cases.
By the way, Bogan review made my day. The sentence, “Bogan does away with a comedy track, but who needs one when Hansika is on screen?” and other such gems.
LikeLike