There are many tributes to Nirmal Shekar out there. I just want to talk about what it meant for a kid interested in words, in language, in writing, in self-expression to read someone like him.
There’s the general tendency, today, to look down on writerly writing. It’s considered masturbatory. Write simply, in a way everyone understands. That’s the mantra. And this has led to writing being considered some kind of social service. You are meant to write for others, not to express yourself, your voice.
It’s good the Internet did not exist while I was growing up, because no one told me these things. And when I read someone like Nirmal, it was a revelation. Because he was saying that you could be yourself even in a general-interest newspaper, that you did not have to write keeping in mind the reader, that those who enjoyed your writing would read you and those who did not have the patience or the inclination wouldn’t, and that was okay. When you reach for writerly effects, some columns will work, some won’t, and that’s okay. Some people will read your effusive prose like a religious experience, some will mock and laugh, and that’s okay.
I’ve never been to journalism school, but this was one of my earliest lessons. It’s not necessary that everyone reads you, likes you. As long as your writing resonates with someone, anyone, that’s enough. He hammered this message home week after week. And for that, thank you.
PS: We used to say hello whenever we met at The Hindu, but I can’t say I really knew him.
PPS: He predicted Federer’s 18th. What a way to go.
Madan
February 3, 2017
Hoped for a longer and more writerly tribute ( I know it’s not exactly a tribute but still…). What you say about writing and the internet may be true but we crave indulgence in this space. I was looking forward to Nirmal Shekar’s tribute to Fed for the 18th and was puzzled as Monday gave way to Tuesday and there was no sign of it. Little did I know the reason why. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vivek
February 3, 2017
Fantastic writer! Along with Vijay Lokapally, these were 2 people whose articles I used to wait for, on The Hindu & Sportstar. Cricket and Tennis were served in way no other papers served, through the duo. If it was joyous to watch Brian Lara waltz on the field, these men waltzed with words in their description of the innings. Joy through words is what they provided and like you said, it may not have worked for everyone but I know I used to crave their articles around every major cricket/tennis fixtures. God bless his soul!
LikeLike
sridharraman
February 3, 2017
I remember the days when The Hindu used to have a Saturday sports supplement. Nirmal Shekar and Raju Bharathan were the writers who used to leave me gobsmacked. Their knowledge on a wide range of topics and their sense of history was amazing.
It was quite shocking to hear about Nirmal Shekar’s passing. I would love to read all his older writing.
LikeLike
Venkatesh
February 3, 2017
Can’t believe nirmal sekhar is no more.I was always waiting for his column.miss him so much
LikeLike
Pavi Athisivam
February 4, 2017
” He predicted Federer’s 18th. What a way to go”
Brangan, When was this?
LikeLike
Anuja Chandramouli
February 4, 2017
Oh man!! I really really needed to read something like this. Odds are I’ll return to read this post over and over again. Thanks for this BR.
LikeLike
Kay
February 4, 2017
What?? I was thinking of Googling his article on the AO final this weekend! This is shocking.
LikeLike
Kay
February 4, 2017
@Pavi Athisivam:
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/nirmal_shekar/nirmal-shekar-column-is-no-18-a-peak-too-steep-for-federer/article8253537.ece
LikeLike
venkatesh
February 4, 2017
RIP sir.
LikeLike
Amit Joki
February 4, 2017
I quite liked Nirmal because he was generous and praiseful in his columns towards Virat Kohli and Roger Federer. If I remember right, he liked Messi and not CR7 and that was the only time I think I had frowned upon his article.
BR, for me, you’re to me what Nirmal was to you, but if I were you, I would would have maintained a far greater degree of acquaintance. In my list of thalaivars, you’d be my writing thalaivar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pavi
February 5, 2017
Thank you for sharing that link @Kay
It’s interesting in that he isn’t exactly predicting a win but merely refusing to write Federer off. Isn’t there a difference between the two?
A great writer nonetheless, always enjoyed reading his sports columns.
LikeLike
Chatur Vasi
February 5, 2017
Baradwaj, I have always enjoyed your writings. I have often shared your articles with others who love language and prose. Yes, only yesterday someone talking to me disparaged your film reviews saying “he shows off”. I just could not convince hiim. I will always enjoy your writing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sifter
February 6, 2017
Used to eagerly read Nirmal’s Shekar’s columns in ‘The Hindu’.
RIP Sir
LikeLike
sravishanker1401gmailcom
February 6, 2017
BR : Wonderful, concise tribute to Nirmal S. I was about to call my son in Delhi and tell him but he was faster on the draw and sent me the news on WhatsApp thinking I’d missed it. I DIDNT know he read Nirmal Shekar till he sent that WA message.
Normally one would expect a full blown tribute like the ones they do in Readers Digest . You know ‘Unforgettable So and So” but tributes can be concise AND THATS OK.
You’d dealt with this in a previous article (or was it in response to a comment ?) that sometimes readers may find a piece kinda highbrow (actually I’m missing the exact word you used) but and thats a risk that goes with the territory.
LikeLike
sravishanker1401gmailcom
February 6, 2017
“sometimes readers may find a piece kinda highbrow (actually I’m missing the exact word you used)”
got it now. The word you used was “pretentious”
LikeLiked by 1 person