Spoilers ahead…
Kay Kay Menon rarely finds roles worthy of his talent, but in Ghazi, he lucks out. He plays Rann Vijay Singh, a naval captain entrusted with a submarine and a mission. It’s 1971. News has trickled down that Pakistan is preparing to strike the eastern coast. Singh and his crew are asked to keep a lookout in the Bay of Bengal. But here’s the thing. Singh wants action. He’s got a mad-cowboy glint in the eye, (and due to personal reasons, which we learn about later), he’s like Ahab chasing the whale. He wants to nuke the enemy. Imagine his annoyance when the wary top brass saddles him with the rulebook-quoting Lt.Commander Arjun Varma (the towering Rana Daggubati.)
A number of Hollywood films – or at least, Hollywood templates – come to mind. There’s the clash of ideology and working methods from Mutiny on the Bounty. The underwater manoeuvres to sink a sub bring to mind The Hunt for Red October. But most of all, we are reminded of war movies like the recent Hacksaw Ridge, which tell stories of little-remembered campaigns with little-remembered people.
But this isn’t to say that the director, Sankalp Reddy, has cobbled together a pastiche. His only major misstep is to announce, at the beginning, that his film is about the PNS Ghazi being sunk by the Indian Navy, near Visakhapatnam. When you’re making a movie about a slice of history not many are familiar with, why reveal the ending? And the one major concession to commerce is the refugee played by Taapsee Pannu, who’s rescued mid-sea and brought into the sub simply so we don’t end up with a movie filled only with men. (And how convenient that she’s a doctor!). Otherwise, Reddy does a solid job of sustaining the narrative, with one crisis after another. Batteries dying! No food! Very little oxygen! Visual effects that could have been better (but aren’t terrible either)!
Ghazi works because of the spectacular, suspenseful mind games between the Indians and the Pakistanis (their commander is played by Rahul Singh, who grimaces enough to make it fun to hate him). And we’re told theirs is some kind of super sub, far more capable, far deadlier. It’s David versus Goliath – with torpedoes instead of slingshots. Everything that would have been a cliché above ground –locating the enemy, fighting from a disadvantaged position, evading explosives – becomes strange and exciting below water. We’ve seen many movies where bombs are hurled at tanks; not so many where a submarine tackles a strategically placed mine.
Ghazi is comfortingly old-fashioned, solidly mainstream – and if it doesn’t quite become what it could have been, it’s due to the dubbing. (I watched the Tamil version). This isn’t about the lapses in lip-sync. It’s about the monotonous voices. There are no inflexions, there’s no emotion – a rousing speech by Arjun ends up sounding like news being read off a teleprompter. This reduces the effectiveness of many scenes, but the action compensates.
And it’s pure action. No romantic backstories. No widowed mothers praying for a safe return. Just bits of emotional manipulation, like a character being introduced with his young daughter, so we know a little about him. And the first time we see Devaraj (a calm, assured Atul Kulkarni), he’s bidding his heavily pregnant wife goodbye. The payoff comes unexpectedly, and quite movingly – he receives a telegram that he reads and pockets quietly, because Rann Vijay and Arjun are in the midst of a screaming match. The mission always comes first.
KEY:
- Sankalp Reddy = see here
Copyright ©2017 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
sanjana
February 19, 2017
I was waiting for this review from you.
LikeLike
MANK
February 19, 2017
this was least expected . a thumbs up from you
A comfortingly old-fashioned (and entertaining) war movie
hmm,This sounds like something that Aamir would have made 🙂
LikeLike
sanjana
February 19, 2017
The interesting thing is the director is quite young but supported by big stars. Hope to get more good movies from him in future.
LikeLike
sravishanker1401gmailcom
February 19, 2017
BR : We’ve come a looooong way it appears. I’ll doff my hat to Sankalp Reddy for doing a first in Indian cinema – war movie with submarine and all that.
And so what if Taapsee Pannu plays a love interest ?
Come on ! You’ve got to have love interest !
Probably, a convenient nod to Cameron’s Abyss where Mary Elizabeth Mastrontonio livens up the other wise gloomy, underwater proceedings with her super bitch with a heart of gold act.
LikeLike
awkshwayrd
February 19, 2017
“He wants to nuke the enemy”, “the clash of ideology and working methods”, and “because Rann Vijay and Arjun are in the midst of a screaming match” all reminded me instantly of Crimson Tide – a respectably solid submarine drama with great actors.
I’ll try and catch this in theatres as I like sub-movies in general and have an irrational love for Hunt for Red October – for my money Alec Baldwin was a more entertaining Jack Ryan than Harrison Ford and in fact, this was the only entertaining Jack Ryan movie – but that could just be attributable to John McTiernan’s direction and the solid cast.
I do wonder why they felt the need to add a token female character in a story where nobody would question the absence of one, specially since it’s a period movie. The only other sub-movie I know of with with a female character was Down Persicope – and that’s a dudebro comedy which treats her presence as a chance for more raunchy jokes. Every other movie got along just fine – albeit with major Hollywood stars (Do major action stars just love sub-movies?)
But since it’s Taapsee Pannu and she’s literally in everything nowadays I guess it’s OK (as long as she’s not also token Love Interest). I’m looking fwd now to her first movie as The Headlining Star playing a desi homegrown La Femme Nikita without the angst – I really liked the trailer
Is this the first time a female actor has gotten a movie greenlit as the lead just on the strength of 1 kickass action scene?
LikeLiked by 2 people
sridharraman
February 19, 2017
There are no inflexions, there’s no emotion – a rousing speech by Arjun ends up sounding like news being read off a teleprompter.
I haven’t seen the movie, but, based on the Telugu trailer alone, I can (probably) assure you that Rana Daggubati’s speech in his own voice would have still sounded the same. 😛
LikeLiked by 2 people
Subhash
February 19, 2017
The best mainstream moment in a not so mainstream film
“Is it a submarine? or is he a lift operator?”
Superb!
LikeLiked by 1 person
praneshp
February 20, 2017
@MANK: “hmm,This sounds like something that Aamir would have made 🙂”
Yes, and he would have done 6 months of promos and worn flags all over the body on TV shows before the release. Followed by an article in about how it sucks to live in India because of too much patriotism.
In case it wasn’t clear, I hate Aamir Khan. Sucks that his movies are mostly good, I have to seethe for a few days everytime one comes out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kaaviyathalagani
February 20, 2017
Amidst the pacing, lots of the staging seemed eerily similar to the very tight Black Sea (Jude Law, Kevin Macdonald, 2014) a little too similar to not think of Ghazi on its own terms.
The problem that you mention in the beginning was the same problem with Shahid. Even though we (may) know the true story, why show him being shot dead before everything else? Just so the rest of the story has more weight? I’d rather have it hit me harder in the end, once I root for him and what he stood for. Extend that to the ensemble here.
But then again, I was just happy Rana Daggubati was more alive and alert, than his wax model.
LikeLike
Jaga_Jaga
February 20, 2017
A solid movie! Went for a Sunday night show only because you wrote good things about it! One point I feel you could have added here was the dexterous use of soldier/war-time songs. So very rarely do we get to see genuine nationalistic feelings being used as brilliant subterfuge tactics!
Also, two torpedoes colliding almost head-on brought back memories of BR Chopra’s Mahabharat (agni astra vs varuna astra etc. etc.)!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
February 20, 2017
Jaga_Jaga: two torpedoes colliding almost head-on brought back memories of BR Chopra’s Mahabharat (agni astra vs varuna astra etc. etc.)
Okay, you’ve just killed the memory of this scene for me 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
avik... (@avikpram)
February 20, 2017
Talking about Hollywood submarine films, “Crimson Tide” is a really good one, with the maverick captain played by Gene Hackman, countered by the idealistic second-in-command Denzel Washington. Just checked now and realized it was directed by Tony Scott, which does explain a lot about how entertaining and taut thriller it was.
LikeLike
AshokS
February 21, 2017
Talking about submarine films, I recently saw Das Boot. I had heard of it in my school years but skipped it for very long having been saturated with war movies of all flavours over the years. I was completely spellbound watching the movie, all 150 minutes of it. The real life, stark portrayal of claustrophobia, desolation and helplessness just leaves you breathless and drained. On top of that, great storytelling, character building and chilling suspense that keeps you on the edge of the seat. The movie stayed with me long after I had finished watching it.
LikeLike
raghavan0418
February 21, 2017
The movie is comforting for movie buffs but is clearly a radical shift in the minds of the masses, who are waiting for item songs and Brahmanandam humor.
I personally enjoyed the film, even though I too was reminded of Hunt for Red October.
LikeLike
prudhviraj87
February 23, 2017
Sankalp Reddy is actually 32 if I’m not wrong. It’s nothing important but just wanted to correct it since you mentioned it 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
vishal yogin
March 2, 2017
What was cute was all the yes’s all around whenever there was success. It made me wonder, what would they have uttered in hindi instead 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
anurag1700
March 11, 2017
Just watched it in original Hindi and its true for it as well. The monotonous voices and dialogue delivery is probably the only major negative in this entirely otherwise well made film. The only one having some command on his vocal as well as overall performance is KK. Otherwise even Rana sounds like a really bad actor whenever he opens his mouth.
And for god sake whats with the national anthem manipulativeness bollywood has gotten into. Is it not enough that we stand up at the begining before the film that filmmakers are using it within movies full fledged. First Dangal and now this. I have no disrespect to this but all i am saying is particularly in this film they cud have used any other national song to annoy the enemy which does not require standing up. That really kills the concentration and involvement.
Another word on sound recording and sound design along with the vocal recording. I genuonely felt the sound designer had the greatest oportunity here to learn from U-571 and Crimson Tide movies that it was borrowing ideas from and really suck us into this world. But all they could care more for was the score. every opportunity to make it about more real sounds was dustracted by the background music usage.
Still U would say the overall movie has been pulled off really well by the director. Despite some bad acting, there are times when u r into the events, in the narrative flow full fledged and they are the right times at right intervals. Sure Winner.
LikeLike
Harish
September 7, 2020
baddy, director was 32 when he directed this
LikeLike