Spoilers ahead…
Here’s what a Madhur Bhandarkar “touch” looks like. It’s the Emergency era, and Indu (Kirti Kulhari) has brought home two children whose parents are missing. (Their slum was razed down to make way for a five-star hotel.) Indu’s husband Navin (an excellent Tota Roy Chowdhury), a mid-level government official who prioritises his needs over those of the nation at large, doesn’t want the children to stay. They argue in the kitchen, and the argument is framed through a glass double door, whose centre casing becomes a vertical divider between Indu and Navin. The glass on her side is spotless. The glass on his side is speckled with grime. We know who’s right.
Here’s another Bhandarkar touch. The era is evoked through films (Sholay, Kalicharan) and music (how prescient Mehangai maar gayi from Roti Kapda Aur Makaan sounds today), and also actors. “Do you want a Helen cut or Sadhana cut?” the hairdresser asks Indu. And at a party, someone exclaims, “Rajesh Khanna jaisa dikh raha hai na? Aradhana wala?” (Doesn’t he look just like Rajesh Khanna, the chap from Aradhana?”) This is the mid-1970s. Is there anyone that needs to be told that Hindi cinema’s first superstar is the “chap from Aradhana?” But that’s Bhandarkar. Emphasis is his middle name.
It’s become something of an annual ritual to mock the Madhur Bhandarkar movie, but after watching Indu Sarkar, I wonder if his problem isn’t that he’d rather be making movies like we used to in the 1970s. Indu Sarkar – beautifully shot in browns by Keiko Nakahara (who also shot Mary Kom) – is essentially an Angry Young Woman movie, a masala version of something like Aandhi, which wasn’t so much a “political drama” as a drama that used politics as the backdrop for a personal story. It’s Indu vs the System, and instead of the textural complexities of Sudhir Mishra’s Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi, which was also set in this period, we get a simple Davida vs Goliath narrative. We get the noble Sardar. We get the qawwali with flying handkerchieves. We get Sanjay Gandhi (Neil Nitin Mukesh) as the equivalent of Teja.
Bhandarkar has made many movies with female protagonists, but Indu Sarkar may be the first one where the heroine is a metaphor. Her name, Indu, points to the Prime Minister – and she’s married to Navin Sarkar, “new government.” But eventually, she opts for a divorce – from her husband, from this new government. Indu stammers – and this may be a stand-in for a nation whose speech was curtailed. Like a classic hero, Indu is first a zero – reticent, lacking confidence. But when those two children come into her life, she transforms into Mother India, rising against the people who have her in chains. It’s another war for Independence.
The Sanjay Gandhi character is as lip-smacking a masala-movie villain as we’ve seen. He orders vasectomies. His cronies clamp down on the press. He keeps the nation in a constant state of fear. Neil Nitin Mukesh plays the character smoothly, delivering his lines with pauses where he’s presumably swallowing his anger at his staff’s incompetence. And what lines they are. At one point, he punctures a minister’s (mild) rebellion by calling him a Tarzan who swings on the Prime Minister’s pallu-s. Indu is a poet, and dialogue-writer Sanjay Chhel runs with this conceit, imbuing the entire film with a now-lost theatricality. “Haqlaate haqlaate haq maangne chali!” “Gusse mein badi taaqat hoti hai. Gussa bachake rakho.” “Jharna pahaadon se guzar ke bhi apna raasta nikaal leta hai.”
The storytelling is undeniably (and unsurprisingly) broad, but the masala treatment transforms what was simplistic and didactic in Bhandarkar’s earlier films into something touching, open-hearted, sentimental in a sweetly cornball style. I’m talking about the scene in the barbershop after we hear Kishore Kumar’s songs have been banned on the radio because the singer refused to perform at a function organised by higher-ups. An argument breaks out in the barbershop, and one man begins to sing a Kishore Kumar song, and everyone joins in. I don’t know if Bhandarkar has seen Casablanca, but the stretch is reminiscent of the La Marseillaise sequence, an impromptu marshalling of a sense of togetherness. The song is Aa chal ke tujhe, which dreams of a better place, a better tomorrow.
Kirti Kulhari is a major reason the film works to the extent it does. Her hushed performance is a tonal counterpoint to the filmmaking – even when the film is loud, she isn’t. She manages something miraculous – she almost transforms an archetype into a character. It takes a bit of extrapolation to buy into her transformation, but when an evil regime has taken away your home, the orphaned children you’ve come to look at as your own (Indu grew up an orphan too), your friend (a very moving Sheeba Chaddha), it’s not inconceivable that you rise in rebellion. It’s a shame that the score doesn’t trust her performance, nudging us constantly with cues about how to feel. The emotion on her face is all the background music we need.
Copyright ©2017 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Rohit Sathish Nair
July 30, 2017
Too many contrarian threads in a week! Sir, people are keeping count!
LikeLike
sanjana
July 30, 2017
This review is too sweet. And as such somewhat boring.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chhotesaab
July 30, 2017
“Rajesh Khanna jaisa dikh raha hai na? Aradhana wala?” (Doesn’t he look just like Rajesh Khanna, the chap from Aradhana?”) This is the mid-1970s. Is there anyone that needs to be told that Hindi cinema’s first superstar is the “chap from Aradhana?” But that’s Bhandarkar. Emphasis is his middle name.
I haven’t seen the movie so don’t know the context but maybe what the dialogue meant was that the look was like Rajesh Khanna from Aradhana as opposed to his later films till that point , as in Aradhana wala Rajesh Khanna jaisa dikh raha hain, and not Aap ki Kasam wala or Namak Haram wala.
LikeLike
Rahul Tyagi
July 30, 2017
I don’t see the problem with “Aradhana waala”. In fact, I think it is perfectly believable that someone talking about Rajesh Khanna just after the release of Aradhana would probably say it that way. He wasn’t very well known till Aradhana came around. There is no direct parallel I can think of right now, but it would be akin to someone saying “She looks like Taapsi Pannu, no? Woh “Pink” waali.” If anything, I like that bit of detail/flavor added by that phrase, rather than thinking of it as over-emphasis.
LikeLike
brangan
July 30, 2017
I think I may have slipped up here. When I wrote this review, I kept thinking Aradhana was 1969 and this film is set in 1976, so who wouldn’t know Rajesh Khanna? But the line probably came in a flashback, circa 1969. So, I guess, I misremembered. My bad.
LikeLike
Jyoti S Kumar
July 31, 2017
How do u remember the dialogues sir, with just one viewing, since I believe you’ve quoted verbatim?
LikeLike
Apu
July 31, 2017
This is probably the only positive review I have read – and I am guessing it has partly to do with reviewers judging the movie based on its political inclinations. It is strange how Bhandarkar can get away with (maybe) other bad movies, but this one gets the most criticism due to what people perceive as him “siding with the present government”.
LikeLike
brangan
July 31, 2017
Jyoti S Kumar: That’s like three or four lines out of a whole script 🙂
Apu: But that’s fair too, no? The film spoke to me as a 70s masala movie, but it’s possible to view it through other prisms too, and maybe seen that way, it doesn’t work as well.
LikeLike
Apu
July 31, 2017
“The film spoke to me as a 70s masala movie, but it’s possible to view it through other prisms too, and maybe seen that way, it doesn’t work as well.”
True, reviews are almost always subjective, but a little objectivity helps the reader. Besides, there are very few who can honestly praise the “emergency period” as a successful, happy time for Indians.
Btw, Baadshaho seems to have been set in the same time period, what’s up with the sudden interest in the Emergency?
LikeLike
Madan
August 1, 2017
” Besides, there are very few who can honestly praise the “emergency period” as a successful, happy time for Indians.” – Well, I did come across an article – I think it was by Prem Shankar Jha for Wire – both justifying the reasons for imposition of emergency back then as well as saying the climate was still more permissible than today’s undeclared emergency situation. Since I did not live through those times, I would rather not comment on the comparison but those who have experienced both (preferably from the non bhakt non congi group) can shed light on whether they agree with the above assertion.
LikeLike
Srinivas R
August 1, 2017
Madan – Though I am someone who is extremely unhappy with the current situation with respect to non-conforming opinions, I think calling it an undeclared emergency is an overstatement. I mean, I can still call out the failings of the current government in social media and can be reasonably sure that no one is going to come after me ( except may be internet trolls). Though I haven’t lived through the actual emergency, it severely restricted any opinion against the govt. by all accounts. A media entity like Wire would have been wiped out in emergency, that they still exist and provide an alternative narrative to the popular opinion is a relief we couldn’t have had during actual emergency.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Srinivas R
August 1, 2017
Apu – very wary of Baadshaho. Not a fan of the director’s previous attempt at creating movies out of real life stories, so I am dreading how badly reality is going to be mangled here.
The reason for sudden interest in emergency period is because it shows the grand old party of India in poor light, which warms the hearts of all blind believers(IMO).
LikeLike
sanjana
August 1, 2017
Emergency is history. Also other incidents are history. We dont know when what will become right and what will become wrong. It depends upon which party gets elected with absolute majority and which party tries to misuse that to gain absolute power over citizens by overt or covert means. Sometimes depends on the powerful leaders as in the case of IG, sometimes depends on the party honchos. At the end of the day, country suffers and starts moving backwards. And so are its citizens.
LikeLike
sanjana
August 1, 2017
According to some who lived in that era, what made the emergency happen was the call given to police and the army to revolt against the government and other issue was court judgments. I dont know how far this is true. IG came back as pm after losing power for a while. Did people forget so soon?
LikeLike
Honest Raj (formerly 'V'enkatesh)
August 1, 2017
Srinivas R: The reason for sudden interest in emergency period is because it shows the grand old party of India in poor light, which warms the hearts of all blind believers(IMO).
Quite possible. 🙂
LikeLike
Madan
August 1, 2017
“A media entity like Wire would have been wiped out in emergency, that they still exist and provide an alternative narrative to the popular opinion is a relief we couldn’t have had during actual emergency.” – This is why I was skeptical about that Wire article but just wanted to collect different opinions to see whether the claim had any merit.
LikeLike
Apu
August 1, 2017
Srinivas R: The reason for sudden interest in emergency period is because it shows the grand old party of India in poor light, which warms the hearts of all blind believers(IMO).
That and, it would be easier to release the movie when this present regime is in place.
Also: “very wary of Baadshaho…I am dreading how badly reality is going to be mangled here”
I believe it will be like “Once upon a time…” i.e. the backdrop paving the way for a thriller/masala entertainer – not really going deep into the political situation.
LikeLike
Madan
December 9, 2022
Watched it at last and your review was bang on and one of the few that seems to have understood it. It’s lamentable that telling the truth about the Emergency is considered propaganda merely because Modi sarkar is in power. I mean, if that’s such a big issue, Bollywood had 37 years to not choose ‘self censorship’ and make a film. For this is the film that should have been made about the Emergency and is unabashedly a 1970s Hindi movie in the best sense of the word. I am sorry, Madhurji, that I had lost faith in you by the time you made this film because this is possibly your best.
LikeLike