Spoilers ahead…
The dilemma with reviewing David Dhawan’s Judwaa 2 is this: When so little effort has been expended on the film, how much should one expend on the review? Oh, there’s a lot of logistical effort, all right — all the work it takes to make a Bollywood film big and bright and splashy. But the writing? Let me put it this way. The whole point about redoing something is to fix what didn’t work. What do you remember about the earlier Judwaa? Salman Khan’s antics or the tiresome gangster subplot? One would think this is the chance to get rid of that angle altogether, but Dhawan adds to it. This film runs some 15 minutes longer, and isn’t much better.
I wish I could say I have fond memories of Judwaa, which had a great premise — conjoined twins, with connected reflexes — and did very little with it. Dhawan’s films have never been models of great comic screenplays — they were always about a bunch of hit-or-miss gags, but at least with Govinda at the centre, we got the sense we were having more fun than we should be rightfully having. Salman Khan is a different story — less nimble, more frantic. He really needs good writing. The scene in Maine Pyar Kiya where he pretends he wants a modern wife who wears minis and midis, makes me smile more than all of Judwaa. Plus, he’s no dancer at all.
Varun Dhawan, who plays Raja and Prem here, is closer to Govinda (except that he likes to take his shirt off a lot). He’s the acting world’s answer to a sugared-up kid on a trampoline. He really sold Main Tera Hero — but he cannot save this dud, which thinks rhyming “moongphali with “Baahubali” is funny. The film crawls. We feel every second of every gag that falls flat. Half the scenes don’t even make sense. Early on, Raja is on a plane with Alishka (Jacqueline Fernandez, who, as always, smiles a lot, poses a lot; all her lines seem to be some variation of “Dear prospective director, see how good I’ll look on your poster!”). A storm hits and… we cut to a safe landing. Why introduce this development if you’re not going to milk it for either drama or comedy?
Vivan Bhatena, as a sub-villain, plays the human equivalent of the storm. One doesn’t know why he’s around except to pad out the running time. Taapsee Pannu plays (rather, gets objectified in) the Rambha role. She first seems a Sati Savitri and then, for no reason, she turns into Slutty Savitri. That was a bad, politically incorrect stab at a joke, I know — I’m just trying to mimic the tone of the dazzling wordplay here. I’m not asking for the subtle charms of an Angoor, which also dealt with twins. I’m just wondering why Dhawan, who pulled off an unexpectedly (and rowdily) entertaining redo of Chashme Buddoor, is at such a loss here. If he can update Sai Paranjpe’s sensibilities, you’d think it’d be far easier to update… David Dhawan’s.
Copyright ©2017 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
sanjana
September 30, 2017
Father is rehashing his and others’ old films. Son is mimicking Govinda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rohit Sathish Nair
September 30, 2017
‘Dhawan’s films have never been models of great comic screenplays — they were always about a bunch of hit-or-miss gags … He really needs good writing.’
Perhaps the best insight about David Dhawan’s films (atleast for one who hasn’t watched his films) that anyone has given in their ‘Judwaa 2’ review (well, unless Sreehari Nair watches it and gets all Sigmund Freud on it). Every other reviewer was like ‘I enjoyed his antics before, but now mujhe ulti aati hai’.
PS: Do make Rahul Desai sit beside you and explain to him what true ‘masala’ movies are. Every other bad film is a ‘masala’ film for him (Yes, with those quotes he adds all the time!)
LikeLike
Akhilan
September 30, 2017
BR, and what about Upasana Singh’s character…?! My Oh My… (The less said the better I guess…)
Oh, this was equal parts unintentional comedy and in equal parts hair-pulling stuff (well at least me):
Note the comments of one of the multiplex owners towards the end (from 18.30)… Just no words…
LikeLike
sanjana
October 1, 2017
You mentioned Angoor and that made me nostalgic. I watched that film for more than 10 times on tv and not bored at all.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
October 1, 2017
(well, unless Sreehari Nair watches it and gets all Sigmund Freud on it)
Chortle You never said a truer word! I read his reviews and wonder what he’s smoking when he’s watching these films.
LikeLike
Ravi K
October 2, 2017
Anu Warrier wrote: “I read his reviews and wonder what he’s smoking when he’s watching these films.”
He’s smoking a cigar that’s not just a cigar.
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
October 2, 2017
Anu Chechi: Which ones of his did you read?
I liked his ‘Thondimuthalum…’ review though
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Ghost Who Walks
October 4, 2017
Haven’t see Judwaa, but i have fond memories of Hello Brother, the telugu movie Judwaa was a remake of. Even there, the lead actor was some one with limited comedic chops (or acting chops for that matter), but at least they didn’t try to make his character funny. Instead he was surrounded by good to great comedic actors and that worked for me big time. Of-course, the last time i saw it was more than 10 years ago, so not sure if it has aged much.
Also, i have a thing against remakes of movies that rely on humor, if not out and out comedy films. I think most of the things that work get lost in translation. On top of my head, i can’t think of even one good remake of such a movie.
LikeLike
Arjun Rajput
October 6, 2017
Agree with almost everything sir except that I kinda liked Varun’s performance. Here’s my take on it:
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
October 12, 2017
From his Angamaly Diaries review:
‘These puppy wars matter in Angamaly, more than in, say, Kollam or Trivandrum, because there is an inherent innocence about people in the northern parts of Kerala that progressively dims out as one travels southward.
In Northern Kerala, people are ready to die for their brothers, shoot up the town for their comrades, and then turn away and forget the faces.
As one goes more South however, the killings become more transactional, and are carried out to make a quick buck.
In Trivandrum, people believe in broadcasting their Wise Guy attitude, while in Angamaly they just shout out their everyday plans, small achievements and inner-most feelings –- all in that sing-songy style of theirs.’
Anyone who could vouch for the authenticity of this statement? Anu chechi, ithu sathyam aano?
LikeLike
Sreehari Nair
October 12, 2017
Rohith Satish Nair gives me more publicity than I would have generated all by myself. I just hope he keeps at it, since PR isn’t my niche.
Just one thing though, Rohith — as you seem to believe that you’ve caught me erring on the side of excess — there’s nothing more I hate in prose than the kind of writer’s vanity which is left unaccounted for (when done right: Norman Mailer talking about himself in third person is vanity but that’s vanity which is accounted for), judgements not born out of sustained observation or strong feeling, and smoothness that doesn’t try to get at the heart of something and instead offers compensation by way of petty punchline-making.
While analyse and dissect my pieces you definitely must, keeping those three things in mind may help give architecture to your concerns.
LikeLike
Vivek narain
October 15, 2017
Sreeharinair: True,i must quote Richard Bach; ‘Live never to be ashamed if anything you do or say is published around the world, even if what is published is not true’ and ‘We are game-playing fun-having creatures, we are the otters of the universe. We can not die, we can not hurt ourselves any more than the illusions on the screen can be.’
LikeLike
Vivek narain
October 15, 2017
Judwaa2 is set to become the biggest block buster of 2017, if not the all time biggest hit.
LikeLike